More Guns! How Kamikaze Changed Ships

Try out World of Warships with a ton of bonuses here: wo.ws/3utw5UW
During World War 2, ships often lacked proper defenses from air attack. Early losses changed that and with Kamikaze, the defensive firepower ships started to carry became truly scary.
- Check out my books -
Ju 87 Stuka - stukabook.com
STG-44 Assault Platoon - sturmzug.com
German Panzer Company 1941 - www.hdv470-7.com/
- Support -
Patreon: / milavhistory
Channel Memberships: / @militaryaviationhistory
PayPal: www.paypal.me/MilAvHis
- Museum -
Visit HMS Belfast: www.iwm.org.uk/visits/hms-bel...
- Acknowledgements -
Thank you to Drachinifel for the chats we had on HMS Belfast and video material:
/ drachinifel
Thank you to the helpful staff of IWM and HMS Belfast.
- Social Media -
Twitter: / milavhistory
Instagram: / milaviationhistory
Facebook: / militaryaviationhistory
- Sources -
Ross Watton, The Cruiser HMS Belfast, Convay Maritime Press: 2003 (Revised Edition) www.amazon.co.uk/Cruiser-HMS-...
IWM HMS Belfast
Dr. Ross Rumble, Curator of HMS Belfast
- Timecodes -
00:00 - TÖÖÖ TÖ TÖ TÖ TÖ
00:07 - On a Boat
01:06 - More Guns and How Ships Changed in World War 2
02:06 - The big guns
03:00 - 1939: No AA defenses
04:21 - 1942: AA Refit
04:45 - 1945: Pacific AA Refits
05:40 - So many new guns
06:32 - Pacific #1
07:28 - 6in Guns: Half a Foot of Firepower
10:58 - Pacific #2
12:11 - 4in Guns: A lovely puff
17:06 - 40mm: A WW2 No-fly zone
20:37 - The Hangar
22:20 - Post-Korean War
23:57 - I am the captain now
- Audio -
Music and Sfx from Epidemic Sound

[@chrisc1140]

A few years ago, I had a chance to talk to someone who served aboard an Iowa during WWII (it was long enough ago I don't remember which one). He made the comment that it was a common joke that any time they were in port, people would take note of anywhere on deck that a poker game was being played. Because if there was room for poker, there was room to put a 20mm mount!

[@JamesLaserpimpWalsh]

Heh Poker AND suntans? Who says men can't multitask. heh.

[@jamesharding3459]

To paraphrase a certain British gentleman: "[Additional AA batteries were fitted].....in keeping with tradition in the US Navy that every crewman be allowed to exercise his second amendment rights in the face of the enemy."

[@ommsterlitz1805]

Eww british ship, there is a serious lack of Exocet to sink this awful sight

[@jamesharding3459]

@@ommsterlitz1805 The Exocet, despite being close to 60 years old, is still better than any of the garbage Russia puts out like the fictional “Zircon.”

[@ommsterlitz1805]

@@jamesharding3459 Hypersonic Avangard missile coming to you in about 2 min to see if it's fictional or not.

[@jamesharding3459]

@@ommsterlitz1805 Hmm, 2 minutes and I’m still here, I win this one.

[@b.elzebub9252]

@@jamesharding3459 Hey this Avangard missile just crashed through my roof and it has your name on it in Cyrillic. What the hell man?

[@grizwoldphantasia5005]

Nerves of steel -- not even the slightest flinch when that aviation asset glide-bombed you around 14 minutes.

[@MilitaryAviationHistory]

British ship, need to maintain that stiff upper lip

[@mariusdragoe2888]

14:11

[@carrotsix]

Kamikaze pigeon Did anyone see wheres its payload hit?

[@ammoracked]

@@carrotsix must've been off camera

[@richardhart9204]

LOL! It actually made me flinch.

[@jb76489]

“How do I stop some mean Japanese pilot from tearing a structurally superfluous new behind? The answer, is a gun. If that don’t work, use more gun.” -US Navy

[@DSiren]

This fifty caliber little number built by me. Tested, by me. And you best hope.... Not pointed at you. **guitar strumming**

[@neubauerjoseph]

Some of the aircraft carrier had 20 20mm auto cannons basically a wall of bullets. You wouldn’t see that today even with a cwis.

[@ForelliBoy]

Regio Navale Aquila: *AMATEURS*

[@wallybooger1]

Need more guns

[@bkjeong4302]

The actual answer is send your own plane to shoot down the kamikaze. Seriously, as good as American late-war AA was, it was still no match for CAP.

[@parvuspeach]

oh the irony, the (arguably) second most coveted and discontinued ship in World of Warships has its own WoWS gaming room, hahaha

[@jamesharding3459]

The VT fuze, like the Tube Alloys/Manhattan Project, is one of the perfect examples of the excellent US-UK cooperation that characterized the Allied war effort. The British come up with a clever idea and lay the groundwork, the Americans implement it, and the war gets a little bit shorter.

[@TR4Ajim]

Then Julius Rosenberg gives the design to the Soviets and they build the SA-2🤨

[@shocktrooper2622]

@N Fels more modern (1956~) Soviet Proximity fuses were developed from Swedish fuses sold to Czechoslovakia in the early 1950s it seems. The Soviets did get some of the american ones, but if that came though spies or from korea remains to be unlinked from what I've found.

[@TR4Ajim]

@N Fels yeah, while the evidence was kind of sketchy for his participation in getting A-bomb info to the Soviets (my understanding is he supplied core construction diagrams that just confirmed what the Soviets already knew). However his stealing the VT was pretty open and shut, as he worked at Fort Monmouth, and had full access to it.

[@nuxes]

Penicillin is another example. British scientists discovered that mold could kill bacteria, and then US industry was able to synthesize the process to mass produce medicine.

[@TR4Ajim]

@N Fels Aleksandr Feklisov confirmed that Rosenberg deliver the VT schematics.

[@CyberBot17]

"TÖÖÖ TÖ TÖ TÖ TÖ" -boat

[@deadzone4155]

Translated: Work work work work work

[@enema6222]

@@deadzone4155 probably a German vessel

[@aldosigmann419]

I'm walkin' heah!!

[@Aaron-wq3jz]

@@deadzone4155 translated by google

[@SoloRenegade]

The US started equipping ships with lots of guns, air radar, and fused rounds, long before Kamikaze attacks became common. Thanks much in part to Admiral Lee.

[@nickmitsialis]

Yes the USN's 'suite' of flak guns really thickened up after Midway. Those 50 cals, and 1.1 inch guns were just no damned good. The 20 mm Oerlikons and 40mm Bofors (In double and quadruple mounts especially) were real 'killers'. During the carrier battles in the Solomons, particularly at Santa Cruz, even though the well trained, fearless and experienced dive and torpedo bomber crews from Shokaku and Zuikaku successfully delivered the ordinance, they usually still ended up getting blown to bits by Bofors round either before or after they dropped. I think I am not exaggerating when I say, the IJN's aircrew were 'bled dry' mostly by these battles and not Midway.

[@cornbreadfedkirkpatrick9647]

He was an amazing person period

[@DSiren]

@@nickmitsialis Nobody says midway killed Japan's airforce. Midway killed Japans Carrier Task Force, the Japanese Airforce died in the Great Marianas Turkey Shoot.

[@martijn9568]

​@@DSiren There's still the Imperial Japanese Army Air Service left though

[@DSiren]

@@martijn9568 The imperial army air service was never given the license to produce/procure zeros. It didn't matter that they existed because the Naval forces and army DID NOT COORDINATE AT ALL. They competed and acted like entirely different militaries. The cohesion between French and British forces from 1939 to 1940 (when France Fell) was leagues better than that between the Japanese Army and Japanese Navy.

[@minkymoo4794]

Gotta say it, HMS Belfast is one handsome looking ship and I hope to visit one day.

[@cannonfodder4376]

14:10 A bold bird to buzz the ship like that. Do it again and the crew will blast it out of the air. Another informative video Bis.

[@epicstyle1000]

Bird Aerial attack

[@captain0080]

That pigeon is the ship's backup message system.

[@GARDENER42]

The Vickers .50 machine guns initially mounted on Belfast used a completely different, less powerful 12.7x81 cartridge (.50 BMG at 12.7x99 has 15% greater MV) to the US .50 so no need to apologise to them.

[@jeremypnet]

Came here to say the same thing. The photo at about 4:30 showed Vickers 0.5 inch water cooled guns

[@twunt2000]

@@jeremypnet Actually the same for me.

[@jamesharding3459]

Allied standardization left something to be desired in 1939.

[@GARDENER42]

@@jamesharding3459 It must be remembered UK & US weren't allies until late 1941 so no incentive for standardisation.

[@jamesharding3459]

@@GARDENER42 Officially, no. In practice, the US and UK were already planning on cooperating. For instance, most of the variations on War Plan Orange assumed a British presence in the Pacific against the Japanese.

[@mustlovedragons8047]

0:28 "You can tell this is a British ship and not an American ship beacause -it does not have enough guns- you can still walk around on the deck." I love that my counrty is the Texas of the world.

[@angrydragonslayer]

And i love that my country now represent 70% of the current AA weapons designs

[@PanzerDave]

15:45 VT fuses. To give one an idea of how important the VT fuse was, consider these figures; the U.S. Navy said it took an average of 3,000 rounds to knock down an incoming plane before the VT fuse, however after the VT fuse was introduced it took an average of "just" 600 rounds to knock down an aircraft. Even if those figures are not one hundred percent accurate, it shows that the VT equipped rounds were roughly five times more effective!

[@LarsAgerbk]

35 years ago I sat in one of those Bofors AA guns and cycled the handles one way to raise the barrels and one way to lower them. I remember proudly shouting to my father that when the gun was pointing downwards I was shooting at U-boats, when they were levelled I was gunning for other ships and when they was pointing upwards I was shooting down planes. I was 7 years old at the time.

[@kevinmccarthy8746]

First off I love England, From their literature to their global explorations. Thank you for the Radar as well.

[@JoseJimenez-sh1yi]

The VT was the wonderweapon of the allies.

[@MaxwellAerialPhotography]

And unlike German wunderwaffles it actually made a difference in the war, and wasn’t a complete waste of resources.

[@JoseJimenez-sh1yi]

@@MaxwellAerialPhotography and they had in enough numbers

[@soultraveller5027]

VT fuesd shells were also used by allied artillery forces to great effect disrupting German ground formations. During and after DDay I believe.

[@seafodder6129]

Why is a drawing of Yogi Bear labelled "Huck?"... The world wonders...

[@kenh5317]

I think it is supposed to be Huckleberry Hound. It looks like Yogi, wearing Huck’s hat.🤷‍♂️

[@seafodder6129]

@@kenh5317 Ah, I think you may be right.

[@kenh5317]

@@seafodder6129 Nice to know that my knowledge of sea-going cartoon characters could be a thing.

[@Mystic-Midnight]

This video made me realize that the Spider-Man movie marvel made in London didn't actually have this ship at all in the background for the Tower Bridge fight

[@neurofiedyamato8763]

The way you describe how every non-aircraft is a target always makes me chuckle. Never change, I love it. Also the bit about how US slapped on guns where there are empty space is so true that it is actually pretty funny and I think Drach would agree.

[@MrHws5mp]

I have been known to describe trains as 'predictable linear ground targets' in my local railways hobby shop, which also sells aircraft kits.

[@Colonel_Overkill]

The Atlanta especially were mobile ambassadors to the world with enough guns for everyone in the local vicinity to exercise their right of dakka

[@parvuspeach]

14:10 pigeon aspires to be a timed shell

[@HandleMyBallsYouTube]

It's kinda funny how those 6 inch guns look so small if you're used to looking at battleships with their 16 inch guns, but then you realize that they're all basically the equivalent of your typical heavier field artillery.

[@hawkertyphoon4537]

Fun Video for Air and Water enthousiasts alike. Well done for bringing both Fan groups together!

[@BlaBla-pf8mf]

5:45 HMS Belfast the world's heaviest aircraft. Loved the video and how London looks from this mighty ship.

[@josephking6515]

Shame it can't lay some rounds into a certain large building that is close by. An election could replace those they were incapacitated and the country would be better off.

[@josepnebotrius872]

And the lowest flying one

[@dylanhoyal3150]

Nice! Love to see the collab with Drachinifel

[@khaccanhle1930]

As he speaks of anti-aircraft guns, he gets dive-bombed by a pigeon. Did anyone else catch that? 14:10

[@Crunch0r]

I was looking in the comments to find if someone noticed as well.. :D

[@TheXLink]

Yeah! That bird is just showing off. Or maby it was reconnaissance bird? You never know, birds are crafty bastards 🤨

[@gertvanpeet3120]

Proximity fuse ..works otherwise! Imagine a metal finder...produces a tone...in the vicinity of a metal, the tone changes. That's the moment the fuse explodes. Always: metal close to a coil of an oscillator, the frequency changes...

[@maade9642]

I'm fascinated about how GOOD the sound is for recording outside! Great work (and expensive equipment I believe ;) )

[@Adrian-qk2fn]

Just one point. When she was built, HMS Belfast was fitted with an athwartships catapult on the open deck space just behind the hangars. Thus a Walrus did not need to be lowered into the water for take off.

[@oldmangimp2468]

Excellent video! Now, while you're still in England, please do a similar video on HMS Victory. I am excited to learn about the effects of 32 pounder solid shot on a WW II torpedo bomber, and how upgrading the guns with grapeshot improves the ships defense against low flying cruise missiles in the modern age.

[@ProfessorPesca]

For anti-ship missile defence Ships of the Line actually relied more upon radar-reflective sailcloth so that incoming weapons would be seduced and pass harmlessly through the mizzen topsail.

[@stupitdog9686]

Not to mention the advanced Stelth Tech...the ships utilized a inovotive construction tech in they made them mostly of wood! .. Thereby giving them a very low radar return!

[@skoniramont]

@@stupitdog9686 hump? what hump?

[@stupitdog9686]

@@skoniramont ??? I didn't mention "hump" ?? Maybe it's you that wants to "hump" everything...?

[@skoniramont]

@@stupitdog9686 naah, I wanted to answer Old Man Gimp, pushed the wrong button. hump refers to his avatar.

[@Kozakow]

I am glad to see you expanding what type of content your channel offers. Hope that we will see the continuation of this trend.

[@battlement]

The HMS Belfast is one of my favorite light cruisers of WW2. Thanks for the video!

[@Paul-ie1xp]

Those .50 cal's, weren't US .50 BMG they were Vickers .50. It was a completely different round (much lower powered) fired from a modified vickers gun.

[@petesheppard1709]

Even the US .50 was found to be lacking and quickly converted over to 20mm.

[@jpgabobo]

Thank You for keeping the Quality Up. Wish I could visit these places. Thanks.

[@t5ruxlee210]

Anyone who can speak at length about naval/ military matters, without even one "the" HMS faux pas, has my full confidence and attention. Well done. The mentioned FAA "Walrus" apparently had more than a few non fans when it came to flying it: See "Spitfire Sisters" at 15:00 for an expert WW2 plane driver's delicately phrased low opinion of it...

[@grendelgrendelsson5493]

My Uncle Jack served aboard the Belfast as a gunner. He was at the Battle of the North Cape against the Scharnhorst and at D-Day. He also served on other ships on Mediterranean, North Atlantic and Russian convoys. He was awarded a medal by the Soviet Union. When he attended the D-Day commemoration event in Normandy in1995 a senior RN officer approached him and said that in his opinion he was incorrectly wearing a foreign decoration (I don't know how it was incorrect). My Uncle said, "I earned this bloody medal mate! I ain't in your bloody navy anymore so you can stick your opinion up your arse!"

[@markbowen3638]

Great content Chris, interesting to see what we 'brits' did to protect our ships from the kamikaze threat. Belfast is interesting when compared to some of the American ww2 vessels still around as museum ships. It's a shame that we didn't at least keep one battleship as a memorial to all those brave souls who served throughout the conflict. The other ship worth a visit is HMS Cavalier at Chatham dockyard in Kent. Best wishes from the UK 🇬🇧

[@GARDENER42]

Should've preserved _Warspite_ Breaking her up was criminal neglect of her historical significance IMO

[@PeteCourtier]

Indeed👍 HMS Warspite or HMS Vanguard should have been preserved.

[@rob5944]

@@PeteCourtier Got to be Warspite (have your changed your underpants mein guter Herr?

[@PeteCourtier]

@@rob5944 Ja, ich hatte mir in die Hose geschissen 😂😂😂

[@SkywalkerWroc]

Honestly: It's a crime that there's no British battleship left as a museum ship. The country with the greatest naval history of all pales in comparison to the museum ships of the USN.

[@TRPilot06YT]

Ah brilliant, just as i opened a nice bottle of wine i have recieved the notification of this video. Cheers🍷🥂

[@mathewcaldwell2945]

Nice work Chris. Very well done. Thank you.

[@laugenbrezel_]

Nice editing this time👍🏻 Also nice to see more Flak videos.

[@xxnightdriverxx9576]

fun fact in therms of shooting down planes: The US Anti Aircraft action report states that the US fast carrier taskforces needed on average 6000 rounds of 40mm Bofors fire to shoot down a single incoming Kamikaze aircraft. Thats 15 quad mounts fireing continuously for 1 minute, to shoot down a single plane. Also, Kamikazes are for the most part easier to shoot down than other attacking planes due to their more predictable paths. Now imagine a full scale conventional attack coming at your fleet. You will need a lot of ammunition and you still wont shoot down that many planes. The effictiveness of AA fire is often overstated (it still accounted for 1/3 of the japanese losses in the pacific though).

[@austin2407]

effectiveness of AA isn't just shootin down aircraft but to also dissade attackers, the heavier the AA barrage the more likely the attacking pilots will either pull off the attack or drop their weapeon loads earlier, which in turn increases the survivability of the ships. But of course the best air defense is still fighter interception

[@johanmetreus1268]

Effectiveness of AA isn't measured in how many enemies are shot down, but how few of them that succeed in their attacks. It's a shield, keeping you alive until you can run your sword through.

[@404Dannyboy]

@@johanmetreus1268 That is well put.

[@rob5944]

During our visit to this ship many years ago I became so engrossed with things that my other half had to arrange a message to be sent over the public address system for me: "To to return to the stern area where your wife is waiting for you." Nearly got locked in the war rooms in Whitehall for the weekend too, as I remember!

[@davonmulder8458]

Legend

[@BartJBols]

That tourist boat really got told off.

[@wilfriedklaebe]

Well... It wasn't answered by those four inch guns, so no.

[@BobSmith-dk8nw]

That was well done. When I was 12 I got to go aboard the _USS North Carolina_ Battleship Memorial. They let you man the quad 40mm's then (I don't know about now) so my brother and I were able to traverse and elevate those guns. Then I got to play with the Oerlikon's on the bow. Biggest toy I ever got to play with. We could go inside the 16" and 5".38's but - you couldn't operate those turrets ... You touched on some of the transitions made during WWII with the tremendous increase in AA on ships as aircraft came to dominate combat operations. The ships didn't just get more weapons for self defense - but - the primary focus for some ships shifted as the war progressed. Battleships roles changed from being decisive capital ships that determined battle out comes - to floating AA Barges whose purpose in life was to protect the Aircraft Carriers - that had taken on their former role. Here also - as with the _Belfast_ you had a change in the role of cruisers. Before - they had been the fleet's scouts. As such it was their job to move out and away from the fleet, as well as precede it to try and find the enemy. To this end - Cruisers had their own float planes as did Battleships. The impression I have though is that these aircraft changed their roles to such things and gunfire support spotters and rescue planes for downed fliers. The Japanese early in WWII - did their recon with Cruiser Float Planes - and ships such as the _Tone_ were optimized for that role. The Americans didn't do that. They used the planes on their carriers. The advantage to the Japanese way - was that it saved carrier aircraft for strike roles. There were problems though with both methods at Midway. The Yorktown launched an SBD Squadron to search for the Japanese - then - had to recover it before it could be used in a strike. For the Japanese - the cruiser responsible for the sector the Americans were in - had trouble with it's float plane and it got off late. Then that aircraft (iirc) had communications problems getting off it's report once it found the Americans. Another factor here - is that of who the report went to. I would assume each scout plane would report to it's own ship - rather that the Flag Ship - and then it's ship would report to the Flag Ship what it's planes had found. With the American way - the reports would have gone right to the Carrier which would lessen the likely hood of communications problems with the report being seen in a timely manner. Also - in assigning patrol duties - the carrier would be in direct verbal, personal communication with it's scout pilots prior to their launch - and not have to send search sectors out to each of the different cruisers by radio or signal lamp. For a planned operation where search sectors at specific points had all been assigned in advance this wasn't a problem for the Japanese - but - if things needed to be done on the fly - it was. The other thing was - that the cruisers launching and recovering these aircraft had to adjust their course and speed to do so. Now - the other thing that happened - is that the cruisers made a transition - like the battleships - from one role - to another - going from being Scouts - to also being Escorts. When that happened - there was much less need for float planes on cruisers. There was also a reluctance to have cruisers leave their screening stations for the purpose of launching or recovering sea planes - as their primary duties had changed from being Scouts to being Escorts. Those that still had planes could still do it - but - the priority of launching it's own aircraft had changed as the role of the ship changed. With the coming dominance of aircraft carriers as the arbiters of victory - ALL the other ships had their primary roles become that of protecting the aircraft carriers. Ships other than carriers adopted a layered defense of the fleet - centered on the carriers. The carriers were center most accompanied by their battleship escorts. The next layer out was the cruisers and the layer after that were the destroyers - who were of course - also looking for submarines before the submarines could get through to inner layers of the fleet. You also had Destroyers take on a sacrificial role as Radar Pickets - sent out alone or in small groups - along the anticipated approach route of enemy aircraft where they could provide early warning that they were on their way - enabling CAP's to vector out to intercept them far from the center of the fleet (and the carriers there) as possible. That was WWII, where a number of different transitions occurred. The nature of war on the land, sea and in the air - was well as technical innovation was drastically different at the end of it than they were at the beginning. Things today - are unknown. So far ... while there have been proxy wars between different powers and small scale wars - there has not been a full tilt conflict where entire alliances of nations were doing all they could to do each other in. The problem with a lot of today's military's is that no one really knows just how some of these things will really work if they interact with each other - if all the stops are pulled out and people really go at each other the way they did in WWII. .

[@aphil4581]

My dad was on the USS Conklin (De). Supporting the sinking of 3 I-type submarines. Said he got his teeth nocked out buy a shell but loved the ice cream delivered from larger ships!

[@thewingedporpoise]

i love the fact that you refer to these as surface targets, what else would they be?

[@stephenmarais7277]

Thank you. I have wandered past this ship for over two decades on my way to work. I enjoy military history and that was such an interesting explanation of the developments from the end of WW2 to Korean conflict

[@nekomakhea9440]

"The 6-inch guns don't engage air targets" not with _that_ attitude

[@finncarlbomholtsrensen1188]

I spent half a day aboard this ship years ago, as the ticket lady told us: Come back tomorrow morning, and you will have more time aboard! And we did.

[@apegues]

My wife and I toured the Belfast back in 1983 while on leave, very interesting, we loved London.

[@Fred_Bender]

Early in WW2 my father was on a ship in the south Pacific .The 20mm barrels got so hot that he would get a fire hose to help cool them.He never had to face kamikaze but his brother was on a gun crew that shot one down later in the war.I knew friends whose fathers brought back 20mm shells after the war. These were duds that would not fire(bad primers?).The ship that my uncle was on was an ammunition ship that they made stay away the main fleet for obvious reasons.His ship was a target for kamikaze.

[@AsbestosMuffins]

VT fuses made for great shore bombardment and artillery fuses especially against infantry, more than a couple generals/admirals quickly figured out a fuse that explodes in proximity to something, might perfectly airburst above the ground

[@BeingFireRetardant]

They ate a couple hundred Germans doing a counter attack during Torch. In full view of the top brass, who were testing that exact theory as a proof of concept. TR, jr. was there watching. Said it was a horrible mess. (As if regular artillery wasn't effective enough against troops in the open... but the VT fuzed shells just obliterated two companies outright in under a minute.) War is hell.

[@ConalOBroin]

Although I'm an aircraft guy, at the very end of this wonderful video 'Drachinifel' is mentioned. He has THE naval history channel in my opinion.

[@alancranford3398]

About two decades ago I was lucky to tour the Belfast. I enjoyed the tour. The tour guide did the usual thing to generate "audience participation" in our tour group and asked question after question. Being part of the crew of LPH-10 Tripoli from November 1977 to August 1978 on a WESPAC crew as a Marine (avionics technician) and the Blue Jackets Manual gave me the background to give correct answers. The Tripoli's anti-aircraft defenses of the Seventies were based on fighting the Kamikaze threat. Your video documents how anti-aircraft defenses evolved with a snapshot called HMS Belfast. Thank you .

[@cliffcannon]

This is an extraordinary presentation even for you, Mr. Bergs, who are always excellent. Bravo-and thank you!

[@RonJohn63]

Automatically setting the proximity fuse when it's loaded is a clever idea.

[@Crane137]

Thank you sir, a most interesting and informative lecture on this historical ship!

[@cliverockability3829]

Really good video by the way. Thanks very much.

[@TheRealNeill]

Your English is excellent but one little thing I noticed is that you're saying "faciliate" when it should be "facilitate". Keep up the good work :)

[@xeonkitcat1119]

Would love to see some IL-2 videos again. Just bought the game and having lots of fun.

[@mrmeowmeow710]

Damm good video from one history nut thank you thank you for it

[@warpartyattheoutpost4987]

"Kate, if you wanna protect yourself getta double barreled shotgun... just walk out on the balcony... and fire two blasts. Buy a shotgun... buy a shotgun."

[@kiwi_comanche]

I'll, "Let's go Brandon!!" to that!!

[@Niinsa62]

I like the timing of the bird swooping in close over your head at 14:10, just as you said something about the gun being fired and the shell leaving the gun. :-)

[@arnold2004]

„When gun dont Work use more gun“ - General Patton

[@dmcarpenter2470]

Enjoyed the video, thanks

[@enjibkk6850]

Well worth a visit 😀 "The torpedoes were removed so I can't show you" Me: "Actually..."

[@PalleRasmussen]

Drachinifel has some really good videos on the subject.

[@johnusher1921]

By the time of the last refit in 1959, even the latest Bofors with director control would have been largely obsolete against fast jets - missiles such as the Seacat were the way forward. Until we get to the Phalanx gun for close-in defence against ASM's (e.g. Exocets). Might such things be an interesting diversion for this channel?

[@TheDranoc12]

Great video as always.

[@roberthenry9319]

This guy is marvelous. Will subscribe.

[@warbo3611]

What a great video, awesome job

[@andrewpinner3181]

Thanks Chris, really enjoyed your video (& your humour). l remember visiting this ship when l was a kid, many years ago.

[@chumisfum7740]

I like how you politely told the other ship piss off

[@whiskeytangosierra6]

Actually, even the .50 machine guns had the stopping power. The issue was more one of range. It probably felt good to shoot down a dive bomber or torpedo bomber AFTER it had dropped it's payload, the the load hit... Even the 20mm, which could chop up aircraft quite effectively, lacked the range. The need was for a weapon that could track the incoming aircraft effectively AND hit it hard enough to knock it down BEFORE it could drop it's weapon(s). Enter the 40mm. Especially enter the larger caliber weapons with fast mounts coupled with radar directed fire control later in the war. All these things took time to develop, and investment. The need was not understood well pre-war, even by the offensive minded Japanese. That solutions were developed as quickly as they were is a testament to human ingenuity under pressure. The development proceeded very quickly indeed - even as military bureaucracy did it's damned best to slow or stop it.

[@vlad78th]

If I might add something, against a kamikaze the need was not to only shoot down the airplane but to physically prevent its wreck from falling down from the sky on its target. Even 20mm lacked some stopping power here. 40 mm was direly needed to litterally stop kamikaze mid air at range if possible like you said.

[@dougerrohmer]

Since the solutions were that quick, I guess the Mk 14 torpedo dudes were on leave that week :-)

[@whiskeytangosierra6]

@@Maple_Cadian Laugh softly then. There are a LOT more .50 rounds. The point I made was that range was the issue. Perhaps you need to read the whole post before commenting.

[@whiskeytangosierra6]

@@dougerrohmer Probably a completely different set of dudes for sure.

[@Axonteer]

if the thing you want to delete needs to get within kniferange to be harmed, they dont have enoguh stopping power. I can also by hand kill an airplane but the plane needs to land next to me so i can drag the pilot out of the cockpit and punch him in the face repeatingly.

[@TomD1999]

I've visited a number of museum ships and this is the best maintained I've ever seen.

[@benjaminbuchanan7151]

I think this is the first time I’ve heard him say “ain’t.” Though I could be wrong…

[@iainsmith6643]

With that hammer I thought you might be fixing wings to the ship. Proper flying boat.

[@enjibkk6850]

As a Valheim player I thought he was going to start fixing stuff 😀

[@hal4192]

Fascinating video. 👍🏻👍🏻

[@lordwintertown8284]

I once had the pleasure of touring this Town class 1936 in 2011 when I was 15 an I must say it was a nice thing to see while on a month long trip to Britain, although some german bloke touched my back while going up a flight stairs in the forward superstructure... Well it's a nice vessel indeed and I have one model IRL an two in games (WT & WoWS). It's astonishing how many different refits some vessels can go through ntm them keeping older vessels while scraping their younger vessels cruiser wise but Britain has always kept their older vessels like the Victory, Mary Ross, Caroline & M33. Nice video as always Bismarck.

[@Camural]

Nicely done

[@alankohn6709]

I know someone who was a loader on a boffors gun on the Belfast and who is proud that it left him a little deaf as he says showing he was showing doing his job

[@hlynnkeith9334]

19:00 RE: Bofors gun So two guys to point the gun and eight guys to load it.

[@Idahoguy10157]

Not all the 40mm Bofors guns were retired to museums or scrapped as obsolete. Some navies still use them on smaller ships

[@davemachoukas6175]

Good one thank you

[@anselmdanker9519]

Great views of a very famous British warship,thank you for your excellent presentation.

[@LesSharp]

@14:12 the legendary British dive-bomber Columba livia almost gets our fearless presenter.

[@wiryantirta]

I mean if you think about, kamikaze attacks are basically guided anti-ship munitions that can vary their flight and attack pattern from sea-skimming to top-down attacks.

[@charleswade2514]

Damn skippy, where there’s room guns can fit.

[@randyhavard6084]

Great video,

[@FrankC321]

Looks like the bridge is all cleaned up good.

[@TheDkeeler]

The Airfix model of the HMS Belfast is of excellent quality if interested.

[@princeofcupspoc9073]

1:25 THANK YOU. I wish more historians would be so conscientious about correcting the glaring errors in our understanding of the war. Hint. The war did NOT start in 1939.

[@harlockmbb]

The spacebattleship Yamato had a lot of anti-AA guns too.

[@ducthman4737]

I've visited HMS Belfast when she was 43 years younger.

[@tfs203]

HMS Belfast is such a clean, and beautiful ship, and I see the USS New Jersey every weekday! British ships are not cluttered with all the light and medium AA of ours.

[@BrockvsTV]

Thank you

[@andyf4292]

been on that ship!!.. the torpedoes surprised me, the size!

[@moseszero3281]

I love the videos by dracinifel where he reads the after action reports of an american carrier (enterprise?). The first one states that they need a lot more AA guns. The second states - oh that's pretty good, now lets take the armor off and add more guns.

[@Titus-as-the-Roman]

However the 5" 38 caliber guns coupled to the newest fire control made and using the Proximity Fuse was absolutely deadly.

[@angrybirder9983]

The pigeon at 14:11😂

[@mattheweagles5123]

Fasinating as ever