More Tanks That Shouldn't Be Added To War Thunder

[@Spookston]

Sponsor: apexgamingpcs.com/pages/spookston

[@TheArklyte]

They would just give M45 post-war nonrotating HEAT round. Basically mini MBT-70.

[@superfamilyallosauridae6505]

The Type 93 has convinced me that, at super high tiers, dedicated recon vehicles have a place. I've, without glitching the map, scouted teams so well that my team just crushes the enemy countless times. A Humvee with a Mk19 or even just a .50 cal or Minigun would be really good at 9.0 in my opinion. You might think that armament is super low, but the ability to go that fast on the map and scout things is just that powerful. I tried to use the Type 87 a similar way at 9.7 to the Type 93, and despite its armament, the difference in speed was huge. But a humvee would be insanely fun. One with an ATGM might even be impossible to balance.

[@DocLeQuack]

Honestly the only thing I have only disagreed with on with these videos is the addition of WW1 era vehicles as I whole heartedly believe adding in the vehicles that started the advancements into air and ground combat that now make up this game and the pure fact it would be just simple good fun.

[@markrateh]

Would be cool if you did a video on AA vehicles.

[@bahamutdragon1754]

Why not add the M-1-16 as an option for delivering a nuke but let it spawn in a normal location instead of the airfield and have to drive to the center of the map? It would be absolutely hilarious and add some variety to the nukes. It could be 250-500 points cheaper for people that decide to risk it for the memes.

[@svitrutar9137]

The merkava style ATGM carrier is made to trick the enemy to think that Izrael has a lot of normal tanks, when they take a satelit picture, while they are somethig totaly else. This will make the enemy to plan their offensive into heavy direct eye-contact anti-tank combat, but it will be a long range non eye-contact battle.

[@beenthroughnam3747]

A lot like our old South African Valkiri MLRS system, we just slapped it onto a logi truck's bedframe, so it looked like a harmless truck until it raised the bedframe. Sneaky boiz

[@duncanmcgee13]

Even normal Merkavas can launch ATGMs out of their main barrel with the LAHAT round. Leo2 and Abrams also use them.

[@diegoterrazas5547]

And if I remember correctly I see a documentary say * atgm carrier are kill first targets* for they have great kill power and low armor.

[@rammpoge9982]

As an Israeli, i can confirm

[@Pellagrah]

Do Israel's enemies even have spy satellites? Or do they use high-altitude recon aircraft and drones for gathering intel? Either way, Israel needs more vehicles imo

[@UWUORTUNATELY]

In Russian slang we have a word "вигру"- it's means "add into the game", often we use it as a joke when there is a newfound ridiculous vehicle

[@HakimFinger1953]

How do you pronounce it? I would like to know how.

[@getoutofherestalker2441]

@@HakimFinger1953Something along the lines of "viegru"

[@SteveIsHavingMC]

@@HakimFinger1953 vigru

[@SteveIsHavingMC]

@@HakimFinger1953 vigru

[@steweygrrr]

@@HakimFinger1953 vigru

[@stuffzie8329]

"They could be added, but once gaijin cleans up war thunder a bit" AKA never.

[@taneyadasmandal1901]

So true

[@SpeedVaultz]

I said the exact same thing.

[@harkyn7180]

Y'know what, the M116 Davy Crockett could actually be a interesting SP "kill-streak" for higher tiers. Say, instead of a game-ending detonation you could choose between a B-29 or a land-based m116: The M116 wouldn't necessarily end the match, and could in theory be utilized to get SL/RP for being good enough to get the SP cost but would take considerable luck to use effectively.

[@SuperCookieGaming_]

i like that idea

[@zjanez2868]

and probably a "normal" tech tree version with regular HE rounds maybe around 4/5. something, considering it would be fast and low armor would mean low spall, but its gun would be very inconsistent+ risk deleting itslef

[@SpooderOfficial]

@@zjanez2868 decent idea, but I can see a lot of people using the tank to suicide bomb and get 3 easy kills. They would rush a dense enemy area, and let one of those HE rounds rip. Kinda just another way for revenge bombing to happen but on the ground. Idk just my take.

[@notalexzander2]

@@SpooderOfficial it’s only a KV-2 shell equivalent at super low velocity

[@generalolivervonbismarck393]

@@SpooderOfficial it wouldn’t be the HE round for the kill streak version. It would be nuclear.

[@rolandjaycutter3504]

I'd like to see a M551 Sheridan with the T-80 OPFOR 'disguise'. The only gameplay changes I can see is a little more armor and a nonfunctional commander gun. I just think it looks cool.

[@fishmansf4]

If it does come then it'll likely be an event vehicle. Since it's in a similar realm as the ersatz M10.

[@bIuebuIIet]

I mean, the gun could be functional its effectively the original gun with a toilet paper role glued to it

[@Skip.8221]

Just looked it up, I’d love that or it disguised as a ZSU

[@matthieumnt4341]

hey you know there is also a M1 Abrams Opfor 👀. Could be fun to see that type of skin added to warthunder

[@devilishwolfie6975]

Do you mean the Sheridan Vismod T-72?

[@DD-mp1kl]

The Pereh was made to look like A normal tank to deceive enemies into thinking it was A standard mbt with standard mbt firing range, usually around 3-4km. The Pereh's Spike NLOS have A range of 25km. So if an enemy force thought they could simply send in some tanks to fight these supposed enemy IDF tanks the Pereh Spikes would be able to engage the enemy long before they would be able to fight back. edit: And to add to that, now that we all know about the Pereh/spike missiles now as they were first declassified in 2015, potential enemies of the IDF will still have to be VERY SUSPICIOUS whenever getting intel on the location of IDF "mbt's" and they may still not be mbt's.

[@gmodrules123456789]

Did they ever actually test these missiles against targets beyond visual range? How would they guide missiles to a target 25km away?

[@richardbell7678]

The Pereh is not the first tank to be disguised. Some efforts were made to camouflage the long barrel of the 17-pdr to not make it obvious which tank in the UK M4 platoon was the Firefly

[@cristiancervantescardenas4759]

@@gmodrules123456789 i think the spike is tv guided

[@DD-mp1kl]

@@gmodrules123456789 the specific missilie used(The Spike NLOS) "Non Line Of Sight" is an ultra long-range version of the weapon (Israeli designation: Tamuz, תמוז), with a claimed maximum range of 25 kilometres (16 miles). It is a significantly larger missile than other Spike variants-The Spike NLOS uses a fiber optic link similar to other Spike versions, but only out to 8 km, after which it employs a radio data link for command guidance.

[@DD-mp1kl]

@@richardbell7678 where did I claim it was the first disguised tank?

[@shanekhiu9884]

The Pereh was made to look like a tank with it’s fake gun like how 76mm Shermans had lines on their barrel to look like it was a 75mm Sherman. Resembling a tank silhouette, it would blend in with Merkavas and not be singled out or targeted. The Pereh was a high value and powerful vehicle which would be prioritized over other vehicles.

[@luigi_terminal7597]

Wargame red dragon

[@johnynuke3310]

Gajin : "no mock up or paper vehicles in our game >:(" * Meanwhile the R2Y2-s with an existence of even on paper in question still in the game *

[@NewAround92]

OH BOY! Wait until you hear what Guyjoob has planned for NAVAL!

[@NewAround92]

Paper ships can be added to War Thunder, as long as the design papers are detailed enough. This doesn't mean that Garry Jib will start to pull BS out of their asses like WG, but we will probably see stuff like, lets say, the Sovetsky Soyuz class BBs.

[@Gegs-f6r]

@@NewAround92 GroBer Kurfurst in WT when?

[@reefta]

to their defence, im fine with paper vehicles if they fill some gaps, as thd R2Y2 does

[@Gegs-f6r]

@@reefta me neither. I have problems when stuff is just hodgepodged together from existing stuff like Wargaming does

[@sams109]

Objekt 490 looks like every tank I make in Sprocket

[@ringsystemmusic]

Yeah, I’ve got this pet theory that Object 490 is just the end state of armored vehicle design.

[@cortexoftheego4568]

@@ringsystemmusic perfect tank, saddly russia didn't wanted to spend money on it, even though this tank was offering maximal survival chance for the crew.

[@kaboom6236]

T-44-100 gameplay is hella appreciated, I’m struggling with playing this tank

[@reedworsham5643]

its like the t44 but playing it doesnt bankrupt you

[@kaboom6236]

@@reedworsham5643 hopefully lmfao

[@reedworsham5643]

I love me some 10k t44 repair cost

[@theus663]

@@reedworsham5643 Pretty dumb how the T44 is 9k repair, but the 44-100 is only 5k.

[@reedworsham5643]

the T44 is like what if russia had a better panther, so obviously, due to the chance of facing panthers, it must have 9.5k repair cost.

[@rockit2415]

"Spikes are too strong to be in the game" -Spookston 2022 Gaijin: Don't worry about that problem

[@nbond-hd5db]

At the end gaijin adds whatever they want to, and if they are unable to balance it, they give it a billion SL repair cost

[@svitrutar9137]

I can explane you what repair cost is for.

[@legate5923]

Repair cost is to balance vehicles

[@reactrandurtle603]

MMmmm...

[@vortex6818]

@@legate5923 it is to balance the player performance in it. Example: If people do shit in the PFM, the rc will get lowered (and it did) If people are gods in the PFM, the rc will skyrocket

[@munched55]

Would love to see the Canadian Skink 4x20mm AA mounted on the Sherman chassis. Shipped to Europe in late '44 I think.

[@aidenadcock7658]

That would be a great vehicle for Britain

[@Igzilee]

Would definitely be fun

[@l258l]

yeah i know that vehicle. i don't know why that thing not added to game. that would be great for english tech tree.

[@somerando1067]

It was used as anti infantry, thw luftwaffe had ceased to exist before it was sent

[@talltale9760]

It would be perfect to give Britain and US a Wirbelwind “equivalent”

[@Deltaguy447]

I think Gaijen shouldn't add outlandish super-heavy concepts like the E-10- Oh wait...

[@jammygamer8961]

tbf at least the E-100 was partially built

[@valian8985]

They could add the giga chad fcm 2c a french landship of the 20s of 60tons the only build landship that was used in fight.

[@FormerlyMako]

@@valian8985 F C M F 1 I want to watch yt videos about it

[@valian8985]

@@FormerlyMako well it would be a good tank à kind of multitureted maus and aparently one model would have been produced but eestroyed by germans

[@tcg1_qc]

@@valian8985 but it could only be used in low tier battles, it's from the 20s so it's guns and armor are not good enough to fight ww2 vehicles

[@blackegret666]

*"NOOOO!!!! YOU CAN'T JUST SPAWN IN A TANK AND NUKE HALF THE ENTIRE MAP!"* M116: "haha davy crockett go boom"

[@thecucumber5899]

“Spikes are too powerful to have in the game” The Freccia would like to disagree

[@midknightranger71]

I just want the Humvee TOW in the game

[@MrCrazybadbastard]

or with the 40mm automatic grendade launcher :D place it at 4.7 with the R20 because why not?! rofl

[@bruhbruh13968]

Or lav ad

[@Deadtrigger777]

Lol same

[@talltale9760]

Best thing is that most nations in game have something that would fill the same niche so everyone would get to have some fun. I would absolutely love the French VBL to make it into the game

[@flare9757]

Oh boy. Is that Subnautica music? The Davy Crocket could be a good "power vehicle". Like a kill/score requirement. Like a bomber is 3 and a nuke is 20? Add a ground vehicle equivalent that is just extremely powerful vehicles you can drive around for, say, 2 minutes. The Obj 490 could also be good for this as a "super heavy" tank equivalent. Still killable from the side, but from the front?

[@uisce_]

Yes it is

[@janekfan666]

It'd be VERY killable from the front with heat and apfsds at proper BR

[@EpochSecutor]

@@janekfan666 >2-4 meters of RHA equivalent at the front (equal to ~2,000/4,000 mm) >very killable from the front Pick one. not even the 9M133 ATGM can pen that thing from the front if we're talking what it was projected to have.

[@yashjoshi7853]

@@EpochSecutor at 2 meters thickness it becomes basically a CAS target.... But till there are no wings in the sky. This guy can hold a flank....

[@EpochSecutor]

@@yashjoshi7853 it's *effectively* 2m thick RHA. Composites tend to be lighter than RHA of equivalent effective thickness. It would probably have been about as fast as any other MBT as designed. This thing ain't a Maus by any stretch.

[@vapelord_vixen7828]

I think it might be interesting to have a so-called “sub battle rating” category for really horrible tanks that wouldn’t fit into the game. Of course the player should be unable to gain or lose any sl but it might be fun to play with meme tanks.

[@Bustin_cider00]

Bob semple with CBCAPHEAT-FS .303 rounds

[@darnit1944]

Aka Maus. It is simply too hard to balance.

[@Rosenrot_raccoon]

There could be ww1 and some experimental stuff, it could be interesting but they will never add it

[@jacaredosvudu1638]

Just the tought of a Minas Geraes fighting something like the kruggelpanzer is enough to put me in a job to buy a pc

[@ravener96]

slight corection, the davy crockett was more like 6 times the fab5000. the fab5000 has 3 tonnes of tnt, while the crockett had a yield of 20 tonnes equivalent. it puts into perspective how even the most pathetic nuke is stronger than any reasonable chemical bomb.

[@NotAgentAJ]

if the maus and E-100 wasn't in the game, would you put them on this list?

[@Bean41]

Didn’t the Maus just get removed? I think he made a whole video on it.

[@hutchthelynx]

@@Bean41 people that were able to grind up to it before it was removed are still able to play it, so its still in the Game.

[@danmen5258]

@@Bean41 he means that if Maus and E-100 never existed on the game from the beginning...

[@PilotTed]

@@Bean41 The Maus got "removed" a few years ago. Anyone who had it before it got "removed" or had RP in it was able to keep it or keep researching it. Anyone who didn't have it or have any RP into it no longer gets a chance to get it except every once in a while where they make an event that allows you to research it.

[@Cuteseals2]

Yes

[@calvinhell4006]

I think the t20 with the auto loading m3 75mm gun would be a really fun edition. I forget the right e-designation for it but I know it’s in hunnicut’s book about American heavies

[@PraetorianMan]

oh... was it something weird like T21 or T22? I know the T21 is in WOT as basically a "what if the T20 was a light tank", but that might have absolutely nothing to do with how the actual design was IRL

[@theonlylechuga]

@@PraetorianMan even in WOT it's a medium

[@JimmySailor]

The W54 warhead of the Davy Crockett had a yield of just 20 tons TNT equivalent. That’s about 1/750th of the Hiroshima bomb. It was a tactical area denial weapon developed before cruise or ballistic missiles.

[@aidenadcock7658]

So. . . A literal Fatman?

[@maltaknob4888]

I think the M45 Pershing 105 would be really cool to see at maybe 5.3 considering what you said about it. Though also considering that Gaijin made the Jumbo 76 6.3 I seriusly doubt they'd be able to balance in in any way whatsoever.

[@riccards]

totally not 5.3 i think

[@riccards]

maybe, idk

[@MikeBison_]

The Abrams CATTB and TTB would be wonderful 12.0 top tier MBTs imo, but only as part of a total and complete addition of other like-minded MBTs for that new tier, ie, all the other 140mm armed MBTs (Panzer 87-140, Leclerc T4, Leopard 2-140, Object 292). Maybe you could dedicate a video to this potential new top tier with all these extreme hard hitters Spooky?

[@viktorkiovics5371]

Wait whats good in the cattb and ttb?

[@TheArklyte]

What's the point of these vehicles? No, seriously, what's the point of introducing them? You don't get that gameplay won't change? Repair costs will go up, grind will be even worse, but you won't get any fun in return. And you won't get an OP vehicle anyway since that's not how balance works, even pathetic snail one:D

[@MikeBison_]

@@viktorkiovics5371 the Abrams CATTB not only gets access to a 140mm cannon, but it has immensely better armor than the standard Abrams. The TTB is a regular Abrams, but the turret is tiny and unmanned (like the M1128) with all the crew in the hull.

[@black.baron_angel]

The up-gunned Leopard 2 used the Rh 130

[@Foxinghton]

the first tank is kind of funny how you put it - "wouldnt meet gaijins requirements". you do know these are the same people that added the non-existing ho-ri production, right? im pretty sure they dont give a fuck whether it was built or not

[@IronPhysik]

Gaijin got deceived by Mai_waffenträger into thinking it was real she appearantly faked sources to get it added.

[@TheMonkey303]

Spookston, the only running XM800 is operated by the Eagle Field Foundation a bit south of San Jose California. They are a traveling armor museum and don’t have an open to the public location you can normally visit. However, given your interest in that and other Cold War light tanks I bet if you contact them they may be a good resource for information and, if you find yourself in the area, there’s a decent chance you can explore the insides of the XM800 and a couple other tanks you have mentioned being a fan of in your videos.

[@exo068]

The Davy Crockett was also mounted on Jeep’s, so it could be cool at 4.0! It would be fast and nimble and you could even make the Davy Crockett one of the tier 4 updates and let it have stock the Bazooka!!

[@notalexzander2]

4.3 at lowest, and of course only the Davy Crockett training round. Bazooka jeep would be funny though. Also needs to have a single M1919 or something for scouting

[@getcancer1542]

@@notalexzander2 yeah I’m just imagine the guy sitting next to the driver holding a little .30 machine gun

[@notalexzander2]

@@getcancer1542 yep lmao

[@exo068]

@@notalexzander2 yes 4.3BR is better. For the germans they could get the panzerfaust bicycle.

[@notalexzander2]

@@exo068 lmfao, and the MG isn’t even a proper MG, just Hans with a Luger

[@ZaPowzer]

ah yes the Davy Crocketts people tend to forget about those and im glad you included it.

[@dragoneye0979]

I actually think the Pereh would make a really good event vehicle. Not now obviously but eventually, when we get spikes (because mark my words they *are* coming and soon). After the april fools event, gaijin said something to the tune of spike's working kind of like PARS-3's where you have to have a direct line of sight to lock the missiles, and the missile will require a dlos to the target.

[@kfeltenberger]

Why did the Pereh look like a tank? It was built on an M60 chassis and was hidden in plain sight for more than 20 years before it was outed by accident in 2011.

[@FSDRyan]

Hurray new Spookston video!

[@armadillo3454]

I like how most vehicles in this series is already in armored warfare and for the most part most of them are Stupid Overpowered.

[@black.baron_angel]

In PvE? Stupid overpowered. In PvP? If you can't play the vehicle, you're screwed.

[@armadillo3454]

@@black.baron_angel yeah exactly

[@black.baron_angel]

@@armadillo3454 I only play PvE and use the OP tanks to get me credits so I can get my new tank in the progression tree.

[@armadillo3454]

@@black.baron_angel does the game even still have PvP? I remember sitting in queue for over 20 mins not getting a single game

[@black.baron_angel]

@@armadillo3454 Yes. PvP is gaining more ground as of recent. Events and stuff.

[@anonym3017]

yeah the davfy crocket has one big issue. the firing range is shorter than the distance where you get a non lethal dose of radiation.

[@aidenadcock7658]

Just pop some Rad-X and take some Radaway and you'll be fine

[@lemonkeyppgov3605]

They should 100% add the pershing 105 but at 6.3 as a battle pass vehicle that way its not being spammed or impossible to get for most players like most event vehicles

[@jPlanerv2]

more like 6.0

[@KrypticWarrior2]

eh, 5.3 or 5.7. keep in mind that gun isnt the best. and the armor on the pershing can be penetrated easily by competent tiger and panthers

[@lemonkeyppgov3605]

@@KrypticWarrior2 i think it would be too good at 5.3 and at 5.7 it would still not be fair for 4.7 tanks 6.3 its a good place i think because it’s basically a Pershing but with more armor and i worse gun but its stabilized

[@lemonkeyppgov3605]

@@jPlanerv2 i think 6.3 would be good because of all the IFVs at 7.3 and the stabilizer on a tank makes a huge difference specially since most tanks america fights at 7.3 aren’t very well armored( in my experience all i see is fast IFVs and very little players play soviet mediums)

[@Mystic-Midnight]

Battlepass vehicles are literally just more annoying Event Vehicles though

[@theScottishKoala]

Damn, might have to do another one myself!

[@malek3616]

That shot in the first clip literally curved with the earth

[@nopenopeson1097]

3:16 Everybody acting gangsta' until you pull up with the sawed-off m26 pershing.

[@sidwainhouse]

Two variants of Warrior were fitted with dummy guns to allow for more equipment to be placed in the turret, these were both artillery vehicles, battery command vehicle (BCV) and observation post vehicle (OPV). The only weapon system they had was the coaxial 7.62mm chain gun.

[@RoDe_1337]

I would really like to see Czechoslovakian tree in game.. Since they have good own tanks from both ww1/2 period to this day

[@addedcheese]

If I recall Gaijin said that the spikes will come into the game but will lack the TV guidance for balance. So I'm assuming you would need visual on the enemy to lock up and then the missile would be fire and forget

[@GustSergeant]

I really want to see the ELC series of vehicles, such as the AMX ELC bis, and the ELC even 30/90/120 variants. Since they are prototypes, they would be best served as either event vehicles or battle pass vehicles, given how War Thunder likes implement prototypes these days.

[@LeGrandSarrazin]

Well, ELC AMX Bis was found in the big leak, so you’re in luck! 😉

[@o-hogameplay185]

and what about the terrorist's favorite vehicle? just find any kind of working toyota and mount whatever weapons you found

[@CharliMorganMusic]

The Pereh looks like a tank so that they could keep the weapon systems a secret from satellites.

[@loganb7059]

How dare you say no to the Pershing Jumbo. (You do make some good points tho)

[@aidenadcock7658]

I'd love for it to get added but I'd be afraid of it getting the jumbo 76 experience of uptiered into useless ness

[@IronPhysik]

About Spikes: in a Q&A gaijin said they wont give the spike its MITL guidance capability and limit it to Lock on before launch Fire and forget, just like the PARS 3 on the Eurocopter Tiger in the german tree with this the Spike needs a direct line of sight to hit and cant spawncamp enemies across the map. it will be then more like a slightly better TOW-2B at longer range, and slightly worse at short range as it relies on lofting up

[@zachhowe98]

A vehicle I'd like to see is the m40. It's a 155mm gun motor carriage used during the late stages of ww2 by the US. It would basically be like the German super gun at 1.3 or whatever it is that has 63mm pen with HE. I really like the hard to aim and use super big 1 shot tanks. High risk high reward.

[@LeGrandSarrazin]

I’d love the M40! I’d love for France to get it as well, as they got a number of them from MDAP. And slight correction, the M40 also had an APHEBC round that could one tap a Tiger II.. So, it may be a bit higher than you were expecting! 😉

[@talltale9760]

Does it have a actual gunner sight or do you have to “aim” by looking through the barrel? Whole reason the Japanese Type 75 got added is because it has a actual gunner sight for direct fire. Most SPGs (even modern SPGs) don’t

[@vp7877]

man just realised your outro song is from land of the lustrous, great series btw

[@csgaming8101]

The M51 super sherman would be an interesting one too....

[@davidthomas2870]

I really want the patton engineer variant with the british 163 howitzer. I forget the specific designation but few were built. I also dont know if they ever saw service or what upgrades they got, if any. Only that it exists and is hilariously overgunned.

[@Unknownmonkey13]

Thanks for the subnautica music, got me to play it again. Great game with great music used by a great youtuber.

[@fortniteman3477]

As a world of tanks player I would like to see the Object 140 or the Swedish Emil heavy tanks added. The Emil has a hull built (no turret), and the Object 140 has a full prototype built in a museum

[@RedVRCC]

Tbh the M45 could be balanced in today's war thunder what with the sheer number of low tier cold war heat slingers that have been added now. Plus you can just flank it. Also the pereh would be hilarious in game. Just name it the same as the tank it's based on in the killfeed and for crew voices to emulate its funny disguise.

[@maplearrow1842]

I really enjoy this kind of video, you should really start doing them more often

[@bomberboyz1308]

I think the skink sherman would be fun to have mostly cause it would be an interesting anti air since it's a Sherman just with a different turret with 4 20mm cannons, and I believe although they were produced at the end of the war 2 DID see combat so it meets gaijins requirements

[@clocktower-pq5kh]

For pure shits and giggles I think we should get panzer 1's

[@globeplotter9235]

Spookston could you discuss the VK 16.02? Ive been looking and I can’t seem to find many videos on it. Can you?

[@N-0-0-B-Y]

It s basically if the panther was a light tank

[@ivanwilly0115]

Wait wait wait. The Fallout Fatman and the mini nuke luncher of Metal Gear was a real thing? Yikes... I have the dream of Churchill AVRE, my body needs more AVRE

[@TheDude50447]

Pariah is actually a unit in Wargame Red Dragon. If youre interested in very realistic tactical strategy games its worth a look. Red Dragon is the second expansion and its set in the late 90s if the cold war actually became hot. Hundreds of realistically modeled Units from the ground, air and sea. The both expansions Airland Battle and Red Dragon actually add the airforce and Navy respectively.

[@gamerkfr2583]

The crazy thing Is that the object 490 is possible to make, but it would be very expensive to. It might be one of the most heavily armored tanks if it is was created.

[@8076A]

I think M45 would do fine, the frontal armor is thick which means they'd just need a flank shot. We already have to deal with Panthers in largely the same manner, as the turret shot is not typically a kill, I also imagine there would be a similar sweet spot on the M45.

[@jeandelacroix6726]

I want the one french M8 that got an AML Turret. Or the AML Eclairage (ATGM and 20mm) Or the AMC 6X6 (ATGM + 30mm) Or the AMX13 VCI with the NA20 turret. Would be a nice tech tree ss11 platform Or the the french Ferret with a 75 recoiless gun (done on Mk2 and Mk1, so there's also a premium/event variant) Nothing weird, all can have a place in the tech tree without a problem

[@Brandon34098]

could make the open top nuke launcher carry a limited number or 1 nuke round and the rest being HE training rounds it could be a good tank depending on reload rate but you take out expecting to get killed pretty quick because its open top and gaijin doesnt allow things like bracing the crew so they get to less vulnerable positions

[@MrDagenham]

Glad my suggestion of the Pereh made it in that would be hell to play against

[@aarone-swing8519]

Love your content spooky man

[@bobek-oc7xq]

Spookston: Tanks that shouldn't be added to WT WT: Are you sure about that?

[@GorrilazWarfare]

The reason they made the Pereh look like a tank is to fool ennemy tankers into thinking its just another tank

[@buddymadog]

Could you do any discussion on anything Canadian or the history of our tanks, even the leopards from German? Something about a possible commonwealth tech tree, include the Australians and all other commonwealth countries? Even if a lot would be copy paste?

[@quartzlandaker5664]

I would love to see many of the USA's humvee based AA platforms with missiles and cannons

[@ZzVinniezZ]

oh man "spike are way too strong to be in the game" and yet SPIKE currently it a hit or miss.

[@Lillspratt]

I dont know if its too modern but the CV90120 Ghost, whould be a pretty cool tank in the game. It can turn invisble on infra red, thats why its called ghost. And it looks bad ass

[@bloodrave9578]

Maybe they should add the Canadian Ram tank, it had a 6 pounder gun but earlier models used the much more easily available 2 pounder gun. Ideal for around 2.3-3.3 on the BR.

[@MJRSoap]

Saying SPIKE IR missles are too powerful is bullshit when the UHT gets PARS 3's (Never deployed) and the KA-50/52 has Vihker missles. On a ground vehicle sure, they would be stupidly overpowered but the Tiger HAD in Spanish service carried SPIKE IR missles, the French one should also get them, else it's an objectivley worse Tiger to the UHT in all regards minus a getting an incorrectly modeled 30mm which actually puts the optics in a worse position than on the UHT. Gaijin said that giving the HAD SPIKE IR missles would be to overpowered but the UHT can dome tanks without even looking at them and the KA-50 can take out supersonics. The HAD doesnt even have the right model of Hellfires on it, France never bought the AGM-112-B, the Tiger HAD carried K's.

[@dejecegamer2923]

yes bro

[@dukeoftoast2420]

It's wierd hearing Spookston using the in game sounds rather than custom mod sounds...

[@steweygrrr]

An easy(ish) way to balance a lot of the 'too weak to go higher but too strong to face anything lower' vehicles would be change matchmaking to +1.0 -0.7 instead of the -1.0 it currently is. It would also go a decent way to decompressing the top BRs too.

[@AppleAirsoft]

BTR-80 or BTR-70 to add some variance and wheeled soviet vehicles would be fun.

[@the7observer]

2:42 - Range. The Pereh can hit tanks up to 25Km with the spike missiles The gun used in the Merkava is the Rheinmetall Rh-120 which the effective range is around 4Km with DM63 round. So disguising the Pereh as a Merkava makes sense as it would be a much more attractive target for the enemy

[@Commander_Lizard]

I would like them to add the M7 Priest to the game as a event vehicle.

[@Watermelon-nh4sp]

Sturm tiger with terrain deformation is a match made in heaven

[@pixelgopnik3453]

that subnautica music gives me goosebumps omg i have to replay the game

[@firestarteronyoutube5542]

Did enjoy this and Scottish's accompanying Plane video. Only thing i wouldve said is that Scottish's video wasnt quite as short/snappy like yours are

[@PeyoteCritical]

I really enjoy your videos, no matter what exactly they´re about. I agree with most of the points you make and learned some stuff aswell. Keep up the good work man! :)

[@justapanzercrewmanwithwifi1070]

The pereh could just be added with dumbed down spikes, which would just work like normal atgms.

[@shanekhiu9884]

They could add it but not yet, maybe with truly modern tanks like the T-14, M1A2C etc it could be balanced.

[@connorfox1551]

That last one seems fine to me, just a higher tier 105 sherman, although that thing is also tough to balance because it kinda kicks everythings ass at 2.7

[@thatdudeinasuit5422]

I'd live to know what a ammo detonation would look like in the Davy Crockett carrier.

[@rhystaylor851]

The sad pershing sounds like a tank they would add, but because it's American it would be put at 6.7 with a repair cost of 12k

[@justalex2.0]

Not gonna lie man your videos are amazing and I really love your channel!

[@joshuaharris1130]

I know they are not great but I want to see more atgm carriers. Like humvee tow, weasel tow, etc... Also I really want the humvee avenger.

[@matzo0182]

same ;)

[@lucythevelociraptor]

If the first tank cannot be added, then the UDES 19 or XX20 probably wont make it either (both have the same gun, just the 19 has the Marder hull and the 20 has two different hull compartments connected like those busses we have now)

[@Ghost0fPakistan]

Instead of adding conceptual tanks in the American and Russian tech trees every now and then, gaijin should concentrate into expanding the Chinese one, it's top tier is so small whereas there are tanks like the Pakistani Al khalid, Al zarrar and Type 85P tanks. There are Bangladeshi MBT2000 VT4 could be a good addition if it isn't too much op. There's also the case of Chinese helicopters like the Harbin Z9 and z11. Planes including the F6P, F7PG and the J8 could also prove to be a good addition.

[@ztcajun]

They need to expand all other trees too

[@Ghost0fPakistan]

@@ztcajun yes especially Sweden

[@jonathannemati5997]

I think the forum suggestion for the M45 mentioned an experimental HEP round. I'd probably enjoy the M45 (done right) at around 5.7-6.0.

[@ronanmcdonald6386]

How do you feel about radar guided sams? Like the Hawk or Tor missile system.

[@thatdudeinasuit5422]

I reckon the Sherman and Churchill Crocodile tank's would be cool I don't think they should be added because while towing around the fuel they won't be maneuverable enough to be effective and the flamethrower itself would only be able to be useful through possible leakage and you'd have to get way to close to make it effective.

[@spazzkill4092]

Gaijin is on a hard time balancing even the M26, I'd be little afraid where would the M45 go

[@jackmino729]

R3 TOW should be added Basically an R3 T20 but with a TOW launcher

[@ThomasFarquhar2]

Seems like a good fit for br 2

[@emrecanakay7953]

t84u oplot with tandem reactive armor

[@agenthydra9599]

You can cover The M1 thumper it was a prototype of the Abrams with a 140mm cannon and a auto loader

[@quocvinhnguyen2063]

I'm pretty sure he already did it in his previous "tanks that shouldn't be added"

[@racer927]

I wonder if BattleTech copied the looks of Object 490 for the Clan *Mars* Assault Vehicle, only the one in BattleTech is a 100 ton vehicle that is the size of a single-family house.

[@connordalton4553]

Object 477, 477A, or 477A1 would be cool additions, but, the game definetly needs some cleaning up before any of those could be added. I do however, think that Object 187-3, 640, and 787 would be really good additions.