Moschorhinus: The Ferocious Permian Survivor

Рет қаралды 17,853

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 88

@AntoekneeDE Ай бұрын

Absolutely love this and appreciate these synapsid groups getting some good coverage lately. The fresh artwork was spectacular as well 😎

@posticusmaximus1739 Ай бұрын

Awesome, you narrated this one again! Really loving these early synapsid deep dive videos. Learning so much!

@youregonnaattackthem Ай бұрын

I learn something new every single video

@MaksymTyshchuk-tf8se Ай бұрын

Great vid! Love it. Synapsids are still criminally underrated even though they do seem to get a lot more coverage nowadays. Thank you! ❤

@caseypalmateer4515 29 күн бұрын

Dude, this video is so much better than yoir last one. I don't mean offense, but that guy had a hard time with your script, and you always do excellent. This one is way better, but the last one was not bad at all. I appreciate all your stuff. Keep it up please. Thank you for your work brother

@AntsAndNature Ай бұрын

I love the discussions about how the different groups transitioned between levels of dominance around the mass extinction periods and how their physiologies caused it. Super interesting. And the paleoart of the synapsids throughout this video is pretty cool. The pronunciation of venomous as “vemonous” two times gave me a good laugh. Love it!!

@kersebleptes1317 Ай бұрын

Very good illustrations! Top score.

@cirujatucuman3363 Ай бұрын

Excellent video as always, very informative about this little unknown survivor from the Permian-Triassic extinction. The way that you put the information into your videos, the organization, and the voice that it's easy to understand even for the ones who are not English speakers makes you for me one of the best and my favourite KZbinrs. These are for me little documentaries to watch in my Friday's morning. Keep it up, and cheers from Argentina

@TeyuYagua Ай бұрын

Looks like CHimera's voice is back on menu boys!

@BigotSmalls1488 Ай бұрын

Yes dood

@Thechezbailey Ай бұрын

*roars and brandishes seax*

@Vercur Ай бұрын

I hope only for this video though.

@KAZVorpal Ай бұрын

@@Vercur I agree, it's distracting.

@micahsmith4612 Ай бұрын

I like his voice more too. It’s less, idk, generic?

@tinyelvenmitten1774 Ай бұрын

Thank you for yet another great video, you're one of my favourite youtube channels of them all! I love these deep dives to lesser known paleoanimals :3

@dinohall2595 Ай бұрын

And with that, this channel officially reaches 100 videos! (I'm sure it's not the true 100th upload since some earlier videos were taken down and replaced with reuploads, but it's still a milestone worth celebrating.)

@aottadelsei980 Ай бұрын

I think it’s cool that your bringing to light that the transition of rule from synapsids to archosaurs wasn’t immediate after the great dying like how it wasn’t after the KT extinction which tends to be brought up more.

@posticusmaximus1739 Ай бұрын

Agreed. It irritates me how mainstream paleo just sweeps spynapsids & parareptiles under the rug after the Great Dying

@posticusmaximus1739 Ай бұрын

Agreed. It irritates me how mainstream paleo sweeps lineages like synapsids & parareptiles under the rug after the Great Dying

@RemusKingOfRome Ай бұрын

Another great video, and great art work. I don't think i would survive this era. :D

@vinny184 Ай бұрын

16:52 those plants the Lystrosaurus are eating aren’t horsetails. It’s a species of Pleuromeia, a lycophyte.

@redparr8490 Ай бұрын

I love when the video drops right at my graveyard lunch, never miss one this😂

@Alberad08 Ай бұрын

A pleasure to watch - thanks a lot!

@themightymrpink Ай бұрын

6:07 This is a common classification mistake I hear all too often in regard to big cats. While big cats like leopards are felids, they aren’t felines, they’re pantherine cats. Felines are any species of cats in the subfamily Felinae which leopards, lions, tigers, jaguars, and snow leopards don’t belong to. They belong to the Pantherinae subfamily.

@SmashBrosAssemble Ай бұрын

I always forget Therocephalians did survive into the Triassic (they didn’t last very long but still) along with Cynodonts & Dicynodonts

@posticusmaximus1739 Ай бұрын

The latter made it all the way to the end of the Triassic and Cynodonts rule the world today!

@mlggodzilla1567 Ай бұрын

Another great video 😎

@alexandrbatora9674 Ай бұрын

Thanks for the video!

@Gfan2015-o5g Ай бұрын

Hey, as I've it seems like your on a therapsid kick, a good video idea would be Rubidgea, the gorgonopsid genus with the only species to rival Inostrancevia in size.

@chimerasuchus Ай бұрын

Rubidgea is actually one of the options on the Patreon poll for the next video about a Permia/Triassic synapsid.

@Gfan2015-o5g Ай бұрын

Sweet. I hope it wins. 😁 I'd become a patron, but I'm not financially stable enough, so I guess I'll just send good vibes.

@posticusmaximus1739 Ай бұрын

@chimerasuchus when's that poll coming out?

@chimerasuchus Ай бұрын

@@posticusmaximus1739 Tomorrow.

@posticusmaximus1739 Ай бұрын

@chimerasuchus awesome! Just casted my indecisive vote

@Bookstorewalla Ай бұрын

I know Moschops is a dinocephalian rather than a therocephalian, but close enough in appearance to Moschorhinus to be cousins. In any case, tthe BBC cartoon MOSCHOPS was one of my favourites. So nice to watch such a clear explanation of all the different lineages. Thank you.

@SyIe12 Ай бұрын

👍⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐EXCELLENT!! THANK YOU. I LOOK FORWARD TO NEW VIDEOS!

@bibia666 Ай бұрын

CHimerasuchus drops a new video.., I drop a new like! 👍🙏Thanks for the uploads. Greetings bibia 👋

@substantialcarp Ай бұрын

I do understand the naming loophole to allow the use of a newer, more common name for sake of ease and prevention of confusion, but bring back Manospondylus Gigas! 😤😤 M. Gigas is a sick name! I guess that means it's now available for a new genus to use, though?

@vinny184 Ай бұрын

No that’s not how that works. It will create confusion when using a nomen oblitum for another animal while it’s also a well known synonym for T. rex in the paleontological community. The only thing that can possibly happen, although very unlikely in this case is if any of the originally described material used to name one of the two species of Manospondylus, turns out to be different enough from T. rex to be a new genus. Then Manospondylus can be resurrected as a genus. BTW the species name is never capitalized, it’s thus Manospondylus gigas.

@KAZVorpal Ай бұрын

This narrator sounds EXACTLY like Princess Snake from the Dragonball Z Abridged videos.

@overworlder Ай бұрын

He sounds fine. But he’s self conscious about his voice so thanks for that. We’ve been trying to encourage him to narrate his own videos.

@KAZVorpal Ай бұрын

@overworlder No, he has the voice of an artist. A painter. And there's nothing wrong with that. Plenty of people have a voice that does not work well for narration. His is pitched too high, nasal, and he has a kind of drawl. Think of the silent movie stars that had similar voices when talkies came around, and went on to become real estate agents. Voice lessons, or teach himself the same methods. But as it is, it sounds way too much like princess snake has been hired to narrate these videos. Distracting.

@rileymanders2167 Ай бұрын

so good

@rileymanders2167 Ай бұрын

stay safe

@lh3540 Ай бұрын

It's crazy to think this all happened directly on top of our property and not on another planet. These guys were chilling under our garages and whatnot.

@ecurewitz Ай бұрын

Poor moscorhinus couldn’t compete with proterosuchus

@AncientWildTV Ай бұрын

great video! i really enjoyed the depth of info you covered. but i have to say, it's fascinating how some people still debate whether Moschorhinus was truly as ferocious as it’s portrayed. i mean, could it have been more of an opportunistic scavenger than a top predator?

@threebythestreet 23 күн бұрын

Great video! Btw are there any good Paleo books that you would recommend? I want to learn more about the stuff you discuss on this channel but I'm not sure what books to get.

@wagashi 25 күн бұрын

The picture of him yawning is too cute 🥹

@louaymasri7873 Ай бұрын

Can you do a vid about the synapsid monkey?

@posticusmaximus1739 2 күн бұрын

I second this. Forgot the name but I know what you're talking about

@EloyCervantes-s4z 12 күн бұрын

And am I new subscriber 🎉🎉🎉

@substantialcarp Ай бұрын

Hey, CHimerasuchus! Why did you choose the name CHimerasuchus for your channel? I'm pretty sure it's a type of crocodylomorph, right? And why the capital H also? Just curious 😁

@posticusmaximus1739 2 күн бұрын

Because

@HassanMohamed-rm1cb Ай бұрын

I’ve got some great ideas and some great suggestions for you to make KZbin Videos Shows about some more Prehistoric Extinct Crocodilian Species, such as Lazarussuchus, Plesiosuchus, and Metriorynchus adding that to the episodes on the next Saturday on the next Chimerasuchus coming up next!!👍👍👍👍👍⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️

@posticusmaximus1739 2 күн бұрын

Plesiosuchus is already on deck I think

@wraithofsolidarity Ай бұрын

All the pain suffered on this planet... it's just like WTF

@irradix213 Ай бұрын

what good bad dogs

@5daboz Ай бұрын

To me it seems likely that energy efficiency would have a little to no impact on high-metabolism selection, given that such animals tend to be more energy-inefficient. Smaller body alone burns energy way faster than larger body-size, so even on size alone such animal would be less efficient, not to mention that warmer body looses heat faster than body closer to surrounding temperature (volcanic winter). While higher temperature might be needed as you mentioned, the reason would likely not be energy efficiency. You do not heat home at winter to be efficient, you do it to more likely stay healthy and alive, more inefficient you are, more you burn, more comfortable you are when temperature drops. It seems to me more likely that there is only or mainly one benefit to smaller and quickly maturing body. Genetic cycles. Chaotic times need an animal that is most able to adapt on yearly basis and animal that reproduces on 2 years is only half as adaptable as the one that does so every year. Also, while smaller body is less efficient, difference is marginal, so same environment would be able to support more members of the same species, enlarging the gene-pool, again boosting evolution as long as that is your main requirement. Also, if we can take our last ice age as an example, shrinking body-size sound strange. Most mammals grew larger to conserve heat, again because that is how you get more efficient with energy along with other adaptations, fur and fat for isolation, maybe hibernation, chunky look for less surface-to-volume ratio. This is not how those animals look like, at least if ice-age standards apply. There is one more situation where small, fast reproducing burrower would have a clear advantage. Radiation. If ozon layer would be damaged due to all that volcanic chemistry, you would want to spend as much time underground as possible and have short reproduction cycles, so less mutations would have a chance to accumulate in your body before multiplying your genes, so you would less likely be too mutated or infertile to keep evolution going. So, I am not saying those were the reasons for what happened to the species, but it seems to me more likely. Nice video bdw, PBS Eons also had a few videos on this topic :)

@EloyCervantes-s4z 12 күн бұрын

Hey dude this type of lizard seems kind of cool.I don't know really about it.And I want to learn about it pamelaria. Please.

@Cancoillotteman Ай бұрын

damn the Permian was some serious grim-dark fantasy

@Soundofwindonsand Ай бұрын

It looks like it would have the locomotion similar to a honey badger I bet they had the same temperament Not unhappy their not around anymore I don't think our ancestors would have any chance on the ground

@aceundead4750 Ай бұрын

Hey look, a video about great great great great great great great great great etc. grandpa Moscho

@Kroggnagch Ай бұрын

How do we know these critters didn't have some sort of outer ear poking up or out or anything? It just looks like we skinned right over the skeleton or at last the skull. Can we tell from the ear canal that that is, indeed, the best guess and very likely how the animal truly looked??

@KwizzyDaAwesome Ай бұрын

They look so weird without ears. When did big fuzzy ears evolve?

@robertomontini5479 Ай бұрын

Were there archosauriformes in the Permian?

@chimerasuchus Ай бұрын

Yes but they were rare. Most were lizard-like, but Archosaurus itself was already fairly large.

@robertomontini5479 Ай бұрын

@@chimerasuchus thanks

@freedog632 Ай бұрын

Vemonous?

@LDrosophila Ай бұрын

😊

@hyper8545 Ай бұрын

👏

@thedimple773 Ай бұрын

happening

@keithstimpyys3497 Ай бұрын

They were so cute its not fair If we lived back then they would still be alive to this day There's no way we wouldn't have domesticated the hell out of these things

@robertomontini5479 Ай бұрын

😮

@michelfraenkel4920 Ай бұрын

Is this AI voice?

@chimerasuchus Ай бұрын

No. I just my voice.

@MrMalvolio29 Ай бұрын

This is one of the *most* boringly condescending narrative voices on KZbin. It’s remarkable that your fascination with the minutiae of clade and genus names can actually make one of the most intriguing periods in evolutionary history--the Permian Period--and make it profoundly DULL. A true “talent” indeed.