Moteur Stirling 4 cylindres en ligne - 4 in line Stirling engine

[@philipperichardot9385]

Bravo super job, un constat quand même, Pas une critique !!, la CNC fait gagner un temps phénoménal, quand je pense à Jean Claude Blanchont qui a fabriqué 60 machines , tout fait main en traditionnel, cette Homme qui nous a quitté était un génie et un Maître en usinage, je suis du métier et me rends compte du travail effectué.... Magistrale.... Néanmoins en tradi comme en CN ce genre de travail demande une rigueur,une minutie ainsi qu une précision, méthode de travail qui font de vous des Artistes !!! Respect 👍👌👍

[@quentinrech]

Comité d’admiration de jean Claude blanchon : présent ! Son travail est juste magnifique, ses machines sont à couper le souffle… et tout ça à la main ! Même les outils qu’il utilise le sont en parti… Malheureux que la chaîne de Fredy Fredy 42 ait été piratée, une partie des vidéos ne sont plus là…

[@mjktrash]

Suggestion (if you're still messing around with this in the first place) Shorten the wick tubes by ~25% slightly increasing the gap between the wicks and the heat pistons, then rotate the engine about the crankshaft axis such that the wick tubes are more vertical (and therefor under the heat piston). See if that increases the performance. Nice job overall!

[@georgecowboydearing6526]

Absolutely brilliant 👏 amazing work, I would love to have the skills and tools to build one, I just want the motor to look at every day 😀

[@RonaldWalters2010]

Really nice detailed work. Great video. Ron

[@dansw0rkshop]

Why turn the cylinders vertical? It makes the burner send flame straight up instead of across the hot end.

[@larrythehedgehog]

what a beautiful little machine!

[@KelvinWKiger]

Jolie! Il a l'air bien stable. Beau travail sur le crankshaft.

[@gabrieltore9034]

Que talento en general !!!! Felicitaciones y bendiciones.

[@dougabbott8261]

A thing of beauty , a joy forever.

[@Anthony59400]

Très très beau travail , chapeau l'artiste 👍

[@mortensteenpedersen6227]

Wauw, it is a pleasure watching you manufacturing the engine. Good engineering knowledge og good craftmanship. Impressing.

[@rodneyjweltham150]

VERY IMPRESSIVE...the computerized milling machine operating at such a tiny scale...wow!

[@MALEVTHI]

Du très beau travail, tout est bien pensé et réalisé. J'aime aussi beaucoup la façon de filmer. Bravo !

[@dubchicrosa]

Super vraiment ! Très beau et bon boulot ! Ya du talent ! J'aurais juste un commentaire à ajouter c'est que tu aurais du incliné le moteur de 90° et un support adéquate car la flamme de peux pas chauffer un maximum sur tes tubes a réception de chaleur dans ce sens. Super savoir faire sinon !!👍

[@dr1verman]

Awesome project, well done. Did you make a Mk2 ?

[@bu3097]

Bravo très bon et beau travail

[@WJCTechyman]

Fantastique! Très excellente! That was very impressive. What is the run-time of this engine with a full fuel tank?

[@QUADRAXIS666]

My god this is a work of art. Do you have plans for this?

[@attiliobastosguarnieri5416]

Brilhante trabalho. Mas com quatro cilindros o giro e o torque foram aumentados ou não em relação ao primeiro modelo de apenas um cilindro !?

[@emil.honganmaki5461]

i think it spins much slower.. is it more torque maybe

[@ManualdoMotorStirling]

Congratulations, your project was very beautiful, I liked the finishing. Is this hot cylinder tube stainless? What is the diameter of the displacement piston? Leandro Wagner.

[@WalterCoulede]

Thank you Leandro, Yes, the hot cylinder tube is stainless steel (inner diameter 13mm). Inside, the displacer diameter is 12mm. This displacer is massive aluminium (not hollowed).

[@PALM311]

You always do such beautiful work. I love watching your videos. Did you name this engine after the Greek Seamonster?

[@krakoukas38]

c'est beauuuuu, bravo.

[@Raj-nh3fc]

Make four circular wick burners around the upper part of four engine heads (like a halo of flame) to reduce heat loss to the atmosphere. The circular burners will provide heat all around the head and not just at one small surface. You can further retain heat by supplying a copper plate circular hat above the burner and engine head to retain the heat down wards and not just heating the air above. Make sure the hat is connected to the engine head so that the heat from the cap is transferred to the engine head. This way a very small flame will give best energy efficiency due to reduced heat loss and heat will be applied where it matters.

[@en2oh]

I suspect that at least half the beauty in this project is in the simplicity of his work. They were designed for an alcohol burner... this works with 4 alcohol burners! Beautiful job!

[@marjonagalliu6359]

Shum mir ky motori i dyti 2 ka fuqi dhe nuk ikn shum shpejt

[@bricovintagerestaurations]

Super boulot... impressionnant !

[@arquerogarcia1583]

Un trabajo perfecto, superior, profesional.

[@mytickets]

Can I buy one how much money

[@rudiratlos6707]

nice construction ! ... I would try to use a burner without any wick.

[@samsgunsight1149]

Brilliant! Do you think the timing of each cylinder is in sync?

[@lionelcox9119]

Nice Job

[@DramArtDigital]

Superbe!!

[@boomstick4054]

The 4 cylinder is cool, but the first factory built model is pretty nice. Built as a unit & simple.

[@en2oh]

très bien!

[@user-vw4xs2xp9v]

대단하심 기술자시네

[@gaetmffl864]

J'adore ce que tu a fabriqué ! J'aimerais faire la même chose mais j'ai pas le matériel...

[@JLmcct]

Avez vous essayé le gasoil pour lubrifier justement ?

[@rajmulay4062]

very beautiful .... if you able to make horizontal mounting i think it will more efficient.... in this model flame is not covering large surface ...

[@spyller360]

Très joli travail !! Impressionnant !

[@MagnetOnlyMotors]

Superb work, very nice!!!

[@jackjansen3332]

C'est beau.

[@David_Mash]

Why do stirling engines all seem to be made without lubricating systems?

[@mheermance]

That's impressive.

[@cslloyd1]

Are you using the fuel as a heat sink? Clever, if so.

[@LuisRamirez-ji1um]

Genio. Felicitaciones.

[@fabiena1787]

Ce projet va de Charybde en Chinois... et j'ai bien apprécié la vidéo : merci.

[@mhuppertz]

Where can I buy these?

[@fulbridgerectifier2497]

How much would you charge to make one?

[@jmkz8633]

Bravo

[@rodneyjweltham150]

Maintenant, vous devrez vous faire un partenaire - Scylla !

[@WalterCoulede]

Vous connaissez vos classiques.😉 Son petit frère, que j'ai baptisé Scylla, existe déjà. C'est un Stirling vertical mono-cylindre de type Bêta. Il est monté dans un châssis suspendu sur 4 pattes d'araignée, en clin d'oeil au monstre selon Homère. Il faut que je trouve le temps de faire une vidéo de ce moteur. Faire des vidéos, ce n'est pas ma passion...

[@guillaumemartin8864]

Belle réalisation d une machine prometteuse en plus elle est jolie car construites avec différents métaux qui rendent ce moteur stirling esthétique. Est ce que le fait de mettre 4 pistons fait tourner 4 fois plus vite le moteur ou 2 fois plus vite ou n a aucune incidence sur la vitesse de rotation ?

[@TheLukemcdaniel]

How much efficiency are you leaving on the table by not orienting it so that the flame is under the drive piston?

[@maycontainhyjinks2347]

Very cool!

[@bsimpson6204]

You should put that engine in a little boat like a Windermere Lauch

[@gilbertdebrouille5736]

Bonjour Très belle machine, très belle démonstration, petite remarque, il n'y a aucune lubrification des pièces en mouvement, huile, etc ?

[@shreeshdixit3391]

Based on your Model can we make home generator 1 KW ?

[@PauloCesar-eb7te]

Coisa mais linda parabéns queria um

[@tariqjaved9495]

I want to buy a demo stirring engine of 2 celnder. Pls give price

[@LaTaverneDuProspecteur]

Avec des pistons horizontal, n'aurais tu pas plus de rendement? beau travail en tout cas, bravo

[@besarasllani1751]

C’est exactement ce que j’ai pensé aussi. A mon avis notre orfèvre devrait nous faire une v2 en réutilisant les mêmes pièces à l’horizontale. Ça optimiserait grandement le rendement en optimisant la chaleur (convection forcée) et le refroidissement des ailettes qui sont malheureusement mal positionnés dans cette version. Cependant, j’ai adoré la vidéo et le projet à chaque instant. Excellent travail !

[@simonz5905]

Pour stabiliser la combustion, je sais pas, mais un seul grand couvre-feu (c'est a dire un four) devrait minimiser les perte de caleur et augmenter le rendement

[@mrpicky1868]

ahahahaha you made it slower , bigger and more expensive . great job)))

[@ntumbabutshiteya6151]

il n'y a pas la partie ou l'air frais s'échappe

[@johnwoodland7884]

V8?

[@Ringo.Cirta25]

جيد جدا.

[@marcelodiegodiez]

Muy bonito!

[@ВикторЗакомолдин-в8ж]

Bon travail! Il y a de bonnes opportunités, tu ne veux pas faire quelque chose de plus puissant?

[@lancecaldwell4328]

very nice.. do you sell these kits?

[@kkkl3884]

Very good do you have for selling

[@lancecaldwell4328]

looked everywhere online and not finding this engine for sale

[@milesromanus7041]

He made it lol

[@discussfu7864]

A small generator can be connected.

[@gpvanahalli4556]

Great👍👏

[@Horst021]

Nice...

[@СергейБолдин-в9м]

But this is not idle RPM, this is max RPM. But this engine can handle more. How to increase the power of Stirling engines?

[@mlionea]

Why aren't there Stirling engine cars

[@azerty._.ui0p468]

Tu utilises quoi comme logiciel de modélisation ?

[@WalterCoulede]

SolidWorks

[@azerty._.ui0p468]

@@WalterCoulede okay merciiiiiiiiiiiii bcp

[@rolandkulet7302]

sa bosse dur . bravo ! . combien de temp pour réalisé ce moteur ? .+1 ab

[@Kamelthailande]

Très beau travail. À la vente vous estimèrent à combien le prix de un tel moteur ? car il me plaît vraiment cordialement

[@call_me_mado5987]

What if instead of using alchohol you used butane as a fuel and have a more concentrated flame, like those small butane lighters that have a small jet flame , they would be way more efficient and would also make the engine a lot more powerful, you could also adjust the output of the butane gas of the flames so that it kind of acts like a throttle

[@haroldbrown1389]

WOW

[@fabienryckewaert3975]

Très beau travail. Est-il capable de produire de l'énergie ?

[@Jean-vz8co]

Oui!!!... mais forcément moins qu'il n'en consomme car il y a comme toujours des pertes!!!!... donc c'est zero ou pire que zéro... je connais tout ça depuis 70 ans!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[@lozza1950]

I have just ordered engine. Would it be possible to purchase the cad drawings. Cheers and many thanks. Laurie

[@WalterCoulede]

Hello @UCoYgwgGb5BUlJk0gas2cb1Q My answer is late, sorry. I do not check youtube so often. I'd be glad to share my files with you. I'd nice this engine has a little brother somewhere on earth. Please, e-mail me here : [e-mail]

[@laynewesley-yt]

​@@WalterCoulede Very amazing production, am I too late? I want to order CAD drawings from you, cheers, thank you very much. Laurie

[@arvsupr2354]

Brill

[@arindammaity276]

How can i get this engine 100 cc

[@laynewesley-yt]

Great project, would you consider selling it, or in the form of drawings, I hope to be able to manufacture it, sincerely!

[@arquerogarcia1583]

Buy it in EBay.

[@granimperio228]

Que beleza

[@jeanyves6899]

Essayé d'ajouter un arbre et ou une courroie et faire tourner des pignons etc Ça pourrait être cool a voif

[@jefflivingstone1044]

Fais en jonc le prochain. De l’OR mer de

[@Lechoslowianin]

J'ai l'impression que la version originale fonctionne mieux

[@focuslekif]

Bonjour, Il est silencieux, aurais tu une ref du moteur? merci d'avance

[@WalterCoulede]

Bonjour, Presque trop silencieux. C'est le côté frustrant des moteurs Stirling. Je préfère les moteurs mange-flamme rien que pour leur bruit. Pas de référence précise. Il est bien noté "QX6 DIY" sur la notice mais on ne retrouve pas ce code sur les sites commerciaux. Il suffit de faire une recherche avec "Starpower Stirling" et on tombe très facilement sur ce moteur à vendre.

[@besarasllani1751]

Est-ce que vous pensez faire une v2 à l’horizontale? Je serai aussi intéressé par un kit (en fonction du prix bien sûr).

[@MrJojobangbang]

Bonjour! C’est super! quel logiciel utilisez-vous pour faire les simulations?

[@Electro-Man]

Il utilise SolidWorks

[@عمادرعد....رأيمنالناس]

بعد أن وضعت آخر جزء في ماكنتك هذه و هو اللوحة التي تحمل إسمك.. أود أن أضع جزء مني عليها و هو 👍.

[@siernandesrocha32]

SHOW

[@daviddavids2884]

some info. at 13:25, counterweight vibration damping ABSORBS energy; and should NOT be used with a heat engine. the out of balance condition at each crank should be minimized, only, via the use of radially Symmetrical Masses; aka disc-shaped component (as seen on many tiny, manufactured engines.) you may know that due to variations in heat conductance, convection, etc., No two heat engines are Identical, in their operation. as a result, there are minor losses, when engines are combined. the use of bellcranks (or any overly complex linkage) is NOT recommended. because, More energy is Lost in a more Complicated linkage. in any Vertically oriented engine configuration, the engine Must, internally, overcome Gravity, FIFTY PERCENT of the time. aka energy Lost. at 12:54, the presence of HEAT-conductive metal links between the sides Guarantees that the cold-sides will Warm Up, during longer periods of operation; and engine performance will gradually DEGRADE. you may know that the Mass in All reciprocating/orbiting components Should be Minimized; including cold pistons/wrist pins, displacer shafts and connecting rods/ends. you may know that the Length of a connecting rod Should be sufficient to 'smooth' the relative transverse movement, at the the crank. googletranslate

[@WalterCoulede]

It's my very first Stirling engine. That's why i chose to base this concept on a reliable chinese model. There's so much things left to understand about thermodynamic theory, for me... The goal was only to see it start and run. I attached no importance to efficiency. Complex & short linkages were needed to get a compact engine (not too high). Otherwise, the engine should have been ugly. I took care of free movements of any moving parts. To my eyes, this "forest" of links moving each in its own direction plays a lot in the pleasure. I'll see later for a more efficient Stirling engine. Thanks for your advice.

[@eifionjones559]

I think you miss the point of the exercise

[@НетБогаКромеАллаа-я8у]

Маленький стирлинг кажеться мощнее работал😄

[@herseem]

The arrangement you have for the flames in your final version is extremely inefficient. Ideally you really want the flame under the hot end, so you would be best putting it on its side again. That way you'd be able to get away with a narrower wick and it would be more efficient, and the cold side vanes would work better as well as it would easier for air to flow between the vanes. So overall you'd have greatly increased efficiency.

[@russellesimonetta3835]

Now kake one big enough to run a row boat.

[@Yan10181]

Не плохие обороты для такой машины.

[@vwg9325]

🌟🏁🛸🇺🇦👍

[@hasanakinci8602]

4 takt, zu verkaufen?!

[@Vito-vn6pe]

1:26 Une image png... Juste une coupure aurait suffit

[@uschifickstuck3418]

Efficiency max. 60%, you put 100% energy in through heat and 60% you get energy out, what's great about it?

[@giovannicesaramorim9adigan961]

Are you dumb? That's literally the Carnot efficiency of any engine to ever exist, no engine has achieved such performance. And also, it's a transformation from chemical energy to rotational energy, not just a lossy transformation from one side to another with the same type of energy (Aka rotational energy to rotational energy).

[@1misticointolerante]

Create un moteur boxer......