I watched this movie with my mom and let me tell you it’s so good 😭😭😭😭
@alichehab58043 жыл бұрын
That ending just goes to show how messed up the justice system is smh
@Cheezwizzz2 жыл бұрын
A true mess of a movie.
@TheRealGuywithoutaMustache3 жыл бұрын
That ending just goes to show how messed up the justice system is smh
@HomeCookGoodness3 жыл бұрын
4 likes no reply AND, 22 mins ago? Edit: I was just trying to say its weird seeing him with 4 likes and no replies
@RGN_1053 жыл бұрын
@@HomeCookGoodness what's wrong
@Antonio-qk4uj3 жыл бұрын
@@HomeCookGoodness 92 likes, 4 comments, AND 8 hours ago
@mysterio38993 жыл бұрын
Tf u doing here bruh
@yikes69693 жыл бұрын
No it doesn't. It's a movie, not reality
@shadowbanned-ok3 жыл бұрын
If the law punished the real culprit, then a good citizen wouldn't take the law into his hands. Shame to that law and their enforcement.
@Black_Knight_-BK-3 жыл бұрын
The law doesnt do jack shit most of the time. I'd know
@wesswise283 жыл бұрын
Justice and the law are two different things, sadly.
@amitkenan38783 жыл бұрын
This film proves the claim of Ras al-Gul in Batman Begins, when he argued that criminals will never receive the punishment they deserve in law institutions because those institutions are run by corrupt bureaucrats
@angryamber87113 жыл бұрын
Meh. Clyde was being excessive. He could’ve just put a bullet in the dude and left it at that. Trauma and anger isn’t an excuse for tormenting and murdering tons of innocents.
@brentrubia11693 жыл бұрын
@@angryamber8711 nah, he said he didnt want revenge. what the hell are you thinking?
@jamesstevenson8423 жыл бұрын
This movie was amazing. The guy specifically orchestrated this entire thing to make fun of the legal system. The only way for the lawyers to win against him was for them to break the rules. They HAD to break into his properties and they had to illegally find out how he obtained his properties and where they were. He could've accounted for that but he didn't. He had a death wish and a lesson to give.
@jabronisauce68333 жыл бұрын
Wasn't simply to make Fun of the system lmfao man was looking revenge and to hold all involved even those representing the legal system accountable for allowing a vile murderer free because it looks good on their daft records.
@Elbuarto3 жыл бұрын
@@jabronisauce6833 He said himself it wasn't about revenge, that if he wanted revenge he wouldn't have waited for 10 years. He wanted to teach people a lesson and was successful when Nick broke the rules of the system and planted the bomb in his cell.
@RatchetRorschach3 жыл бұрын
and they had to illegaly blow him up
@unknow117123 жыл бұрын
@@jabronisauce6833 he just wanted to give a lesson , don't make deals with murderers.
@tonyluong67323 жыл бұрын
@@Elbuarto making him a murderer or the very least an accomplice to one so yeah
@Jurian20042 жыл бұрын
You know what's sad? The guys wife was raped and killed, his daughter was taken and killed, and he has to live with that for the rest of his life, but the justice system releases the guys that did that to his family? Bro, this literally shows how messed up the justice system is. (Whats also unfair is there were TONS of evidence that shows the guys did it. 10 years was not enough).
@aj81242 жыл бұрын
The daughter was *raped* as well
@BenjaminDall2 жыл бұрын
Its a movie..
@BenjaminDall2 жыл бұрын
@@furtywelsh3482 omg you honestly think this movie is how thing are done, dont u? xD Stop watching TV and go outside maybe
@maratpirate63432 жыл бұрын
@@BenjaminDall you think rapists and murderers dont walk the street free around you?
@BenjaminDall2 жыл бұрын
-And you dont understand what i wrote! The main comment is suggesting that this actually happend, as it was a real thing.. You probably think 2012 movie happend as well, oh and the transformers was real as well..
@joshmitchell83702 жыл бұрын
That was my one problem with this movie. Nick was devastatingly outmatched, yet somehow the moment he figures out Clyde's plan, and sees that Clyde is gone, he happens sees one clue, figures it out, gets to the building, conducts a search, finds the bomb, gets it back to the tunnel, up the tunnel plants the bomb under Clyde's bed, gets out, and back into the prison, to confront Clyde, all before Clyde makes it back to the jail. I know the good guy is supposed to win, but come on. I just really hate it when they take a brilliant movie with an excellent plot, well thought out dialogs, and excellent characters, then fuck it all up because they couldn't figure out an ending.
@aguyontheinternet90952 жыл бұрын
Oh they knew the ending but when you're an "establishment" like Hollywood a movie like Law Abiding Citizen where the crux of the movie is grabbing said establishments by the balls they don't deserve and TEARING, well you can guess who didn't want blacklisted.
@WetzforLife2 жыл бұрын
Nick was never the good guy that's the point.
@Vladi48mir2 жыл бұрын
That ending was written for Foxx as he didn't want his character to LOSE in the end... Wth
@keralajoe2 жыл бұрын
@@Vladi48mir Foxx was not believable in this role. He's extremely over rated as an actor.
@Robbini0 Жыл бұрын
There's a chance that Clyde finished his cleaning at City hall before leaving in order to avoid suspicions for not being as usual.
@davidturner16433 жыл бұрын
I hated the ending of this movie. I extremely disliked the Nick as a character. I feel he learned nothing. Clyde was a better Punisher than any which have been portrayed in the movies. If a real studio exec was watching they would have cast Gerard Butler in that role shortly after this movie. How cold dead stare and menacing look was perfect. As far I am concerned, Nick should have been killed and not allowed to do that chessy hero walk off in the end.
@dallywang61433 жыл бұрын
I agree with the stupid walk in the end but I have no problem with Clyde dying since I think it was kind of his goal; to change the way Nick deals with criminals. I just wish the ending would have shown Nick beaten because he actually lost by proving Clyde's method of dealing with criminals was the right method.
@CarbineKiller3 жыл бұрын
the true evil will always masquerade as good (Nick in this case).
@ellowell81603 жыл бұрын
Rumor has it that Jamie Foxx refused to be the "bad guy" who "lost". They had to change the ending at his demand so that's why it feels so forced and out of place. It could be an urban myth of course but it wouldn't be out of character for him either.
@chaalbaaz4293 жыл бұрын
Thats the beauty of it all. Everyone in the story is shown to be set in their ways, both the burglars play fixed roles as 'cowardly' and 'innocent' guys. Clyde is the murderous psycho that cannot help but take things too far. Nick is supposed to be the protag who is better than all of them and everyone fully expects him to out plan Clyde and save the day. But the bittersweet ending is that when the chips are down, everyone acts the same.
@b2kzangelalwayz3 жыл бұрын
@@elvewizzy this isn’t proven.
@cattameme3 жыл бұрын
"What would your family feel? What would your wife think of you doing this???" "They can't feel anything BECAUSE THEYRE DEAD!" lol such a good come back.
@boofstain15083 жыл бұрын
nick saying this to the same guy that had a picture of them up on a mirror over Darby's torture table as Clyde tells him "they get to watch you suffer" lol
@ClockworkGearhead2 жыл бұрын
He could have easily turned it around on him, too. "What does your daughter think about her daddy shaking hands with murderers and letting them go free?"
@Master_Bruce_Wayne2 жыл бұрын
You missed the most important point, in order to stop him they had to break the law that they were sworn to uphold, they entered his property without a warrant
@xondeez7572 жыл бұрын
even though he died at the end, he proved his point. they literally had to kill him to make him stop. they became murderers to stop a murderer.
@ellisd31653 жыл бұрын
Saw this in theatres and when the cell phone went off on the judge, the entire audience let out a collective "HOLY SHIT"
@musicismoreimportantthanyo92463 жыл бұрын
Time
@AceMontage3 жыл бұрын
and everyone clapped
@ellisd31653 жыл бұрын
@@AceMontage kinda it was more cheering than clapping
@oisinlynch84273 жыл бұрын
@@ellisd3165 wait everyone said it
@ellisd31652 жыл бұрын
@@oisinlynch8427 sure did
@Decourage3 жыл бұрын
I still believe and thinks Clyde didn’t deserve to die. He was just a law abiding citizen.
@876jamaicanyouth3 жыл бұрын
I'm of the view he didn't
@hikotai19253 жыл бұрын
Yeah that needlessly murdered dozens of innocent lives to prove a point. Totally innocent
@madmanwithterriblespelling75583 жыл бұрын
“Law bitting citizen” troll
@Bravo_BZ3 жыл бұрын
@@hikotai1925 What is he going to do then? Carry the tremendous trauma he faced and see the justice system continue to be fucked up? If the same thing happened to you you would do that exact same thing.
@falcon81053 жыл бұрын
@@Bravo_BZ well, to kill the murderers that would ruin my life? Yes. But after that, it's a bit of an grey area for me. I get it, he lost his family and the court system let them go because of a deal (that I think it's bullshit of how they set that up) but he pile on bodies of innocent people just to prove a point to the justice system that you rather jail him for doing what was right than cutting him a deal like you did with the murderers.
@hindolbhattacharya97153 жыл бұрын
Everyone is complaining about the injustice toward Clyde, but what about Rupert? I can't believe that a court can sentence someone to death based on the sole testimony of an accomplice to the crime, who clearly has a skin in the game.
@richard-li1ll3 жыл бұрын
they cant lol. this movie, while it does point out many inconsistencies present within the american legal system, heavily skews it to look far worse than it really is. this movie is definitely a great watch, but to use it as a model for how american criminal justice truly works is plainly absurd.
@Robbedem2 жыл бұрын
Yeah, Rupert would only have been given the death penalty if he was black. Big mistake in the movie.
@saschak99072 жыл бұрын
The prisoner's dilemma is a mathematical game from game theory. It models the situation of two prisoners who are accused of having committed a crime together. The two prisoners are interrogated individually and cannot communicate with each other. If both deny the crime, both receive a low sentence, since they can only be proven to have committed a less severely punished crime. If both confess, both receive a high penalty for it, but not the maximum penalty because of their confession. If, however, only one of the two prisoners confesses, he will go unpunished as a state witness, while the other will receive the maximum penalty as a convicted but unconfessed offender. The dilemma now is that each prisoner must choose to either deny (i.e., try to cooperate with the other prisoner) or confess (i.e., betray the other) without knowing the other prisoner's decision. The sentence ultimately imposed, however, is based on how the two prisoners testified together and thus depends not only on the prisoner's own decision but also on the decision of the other prisoner. The prisoner's dilemma is a symmetric game with complete information, which can be represented accordingly in normal form. The dominant strategy of both prisoners is to confess. This combination also represents the only Nash equilibrium. On the other hand, cooperation of the prisoners would lead to a lower sentence for both of them and thus to a lower total sentence.
@jimmywalden16152 жыл бұрын
Sad part is this shit can really happen life this in real life it is however rare for the criminal who testified to get off with out any time usually they will still get some time in prison but in some rare cases they can just be let go on probation
@Jurgen_Ibro2 жыл бұрын
@@richard-li1ll it's not only about the american legal system, it's the same thing everywhere, the communist regimes have always been much worse.
@dillonhastings84382 жыл бұрын
Loved Clyde and was depressed when he didn't win. Anyone who thinks the justice system works has NEVER had to deal with it
@dawk2032 жыл бұрын
Clyde winning would have been the wrong message imo. The movie is trying to say the justice system, as corrupt as it is, is undefeated. Systemic racism, prejudice and elitist agendas are all build into the system, and one man is never going to defeat it by himself. All he can do is act as a martyr in the hope others can be inspired to fight too, until there are enough Clydes to make the system fear them and force change.
@JehBasquiat3 жыл бұрын
Calling him an “Engineer” is an understatement
@elvis53843 жыл бұрын
Engineer gaming
@TK-71932 жыл бұрын
spy: saps sentry nest* spy: shhhh you cant change fate engie: ahhh sentries down! get revenge crits* spy: mon deur
@svampebob0072 жыл бұрын
@@TK-7193 *mon dieu Japanese was rather easy, Arabic makes it hard to be Octalingual (auto correct to Mono)...
@timur1620073 жыл бұрын
I loved this movie, and really shows whats wrong with the justice system
@missvivian80263 жыл бұрын
This movie deserves so much more recognition
@lilyflower89913 жыл бұрын
This movie is remarkable! This definitely shows how effed up the “justice system” is!
@bayazwow3 жыл бұрын
But this movie portrays the US legal system completely inaccurately
@timur1620073 жыл бұрын
@@bayazwow It also accurately portrays that murderers can get less jail time than innocents
@fynkozari92713 жыл бұрын
Its the judges. Dont know how to do their jobs. Thats why many judges will end up in hell.
@sogggy3 жыл бұрын
A lot of people died in this movie because of Nick's ego.
@ellisd31653 жыл бұрын
Fuck em
@carlosuzaier58582 жыл бұрын
Lmao and we're just gonna forget that Clyde actually murdered them
@budisutrisno12662 жыл бұрын
Because of Clyde
@internettroll74972 жыл бұрын
@@carlosuzaier5858 yes which was because of Nick's ego
@elenasalvatore32242 жыл бұрын
@@budisutrisno1266 which is bc of nick lol, nick shouldve been the one to die in the end lewl
@boejiden70932 жыл бұрын
The justice system is weak. Clyde’s decisions may have been wrong but you can’t blame him at all. Defending a criminal walking free is pure lunacy. Then going after the man who lost everything to said criminal with even more force than the criminal is just disgusting.
@cx392910 ай бұрын
Its not the justice system but the lazy prosecutor who does not do the right thing but what's easy.
@cecejamesable8 ай бұрын
It's basically Nick's fault that it happened, he wanted to save his rating, to Clyde it didn't matter if he won or lost, just as long as he tried and he refused to.
@USER_S4V4NT3 ай бұрын
its a good point this movie makes that evil breeds more evil, Clyde went extreme lengths far beyond darby, however he was forged by the mercilessness of darby and the perversion of justice in the court and he became their worst nightmare.
@sethraelthebard54592 жыл бұрын
One of the most satisfying moments of this film was Darby's "punishment." Sometimes a little focused brutality is exactly what is needed to discourage the criminals from further degeneracy. Fear of pain is an excellent deterrant.
@aguyontheinternet90952 жыл бұрын
To some, there's always those are either a walking cenobyte or so caught up in their own hype they think they're beyond such a consequence. Doesn't matter if we're talking batman's ethics or the punisher's there will always be some evil shithead down the line.
@kainlives79585 ай бұрын
Darby was a rxpist and p-d0phile…he was worse than a murderer…but a torturer is equally as evil as those two. All three are equally the evilest crimes and above murder
@asiadramafan893 жыл бұрын
I was rooting for Clyde for pretty much the entire movie
@gregadams56422 жыл бұрын
I believe clyde won he wanted a da that didnt make deals with murderers and that is what he got in the end
@gopet4003 жыл бұрын
Life lesson: never open the door to anyone you aren’t expecting
@jiysea3 жыл бұрын
that's why attaching a secret camera on the front door helps most of the time
@Sarvec303 жыл бұрын
@@jiysea or just have a security door behind the front door and back door of your home.
@wesswise283 жыл бұрын
And have an 18 pounder pointed at the door at all times
@BenjaminP1233 жыл бұрын
@@wesswise28 this is a very good life tip, i always have an 18 pounder pointed towards my door incase some one tries to break in, but i also take it a few steps further by having a whole trench system (along with underground tunnels) that spans for miles behind the 18 pounder with a small garrison of 500 thousand men in it at all times as well as mines fields and barb wire leading up to it, incase this fails i also have an airfield that can airstrike my front my door at any time of the day regardless of conditions
@itsnayifay3 жыл бұрын
I’m just confused on how he was in the military, and his natural military instincts didn’t kick in when the doorbell went off ?? 😭 especially that he served for 20+ years.
@Maoujisan3 жыл бұрын
I have always hoped that we could get a prequel to this movie one day. Explaining what Clyde's job really was, the targets he managed to eliminate, and that the fate of his family wasn't some random thing, but actually orchestrated by someone. The movie could show before his family died, and after they died, during the 10 years before this movie.
@Alejandro_One_and_Only3 жыл бұрын
its actually told in the movie, he was an assasin for the CIA
@yoursafeplace84763 жыл бұрын
Nah, random evil is much better story than guided evil. It makes more sense.
@usern4metak3ns3 жыл бұрын
I still want a sequel. Like he had some fire resistant gel in his cell or something
@UltimaTheSeraph3 жыл бұрын
@@Alejandro_One_and_Only he wasn't an assassin, he was an engineer/tactician.
@Alejandro_One_and_Only3 жыл бұрын
@@UltimaTheSeraph that developed killing methos for when the CIA couldn't kill their target, so basically he was a wireless killer
@Thescott162 жыл бұрын
A great movie with no good guys, just bad guys working against eachother. The main difference being that Clyde knew he was a bad guy and Nick never really figured out that he was too.
@mish3758 ай бұрын
I think that's why people like Clyde and hate Nick. Nick lives in delusion that he's a good man. He never changes and continues to think he isn't responsible for being part of a corrupt system. Clyde knows what he's become but believes he must become a monster to get justice.
@keydraworldexplorer53892 жыл бұрын
Thanks!
@Airic273 жыл бұрын
"Instead of dying painlessly, he begins to shake and scream in pain and dies an agonizing death. Bravo! What a great show!"
@jimmydean47153 жыл бұрын
So nick ruined his life and then killed him? But Clyde is the bad guy
@fg009letyrds83 жыл бұрын
Yeah, Clyde should have killed that Ngs family first.
@apollo16943 жыл бұрын
Clyde did blow up some random employees who worked at the police station and mentally scarred an innocent child, so uh, yes?
@The-sx6nz3 жыл бұрын
@@fg009letyrds8 yo chill nicks familly isn't responsible for his actions i think you need therapist man
@philpalmer80443 жыл бұрын
@@fg009letyrds8 Whats Ngs?
@donnamosley81552 жыл бұрын
Nick IS the bad guy. He played a part too, in Clyde taking justice in his own hands. And then has the nerve to say 'he was doing the right thing', but he proved to be a killer too when at the end blowing Clyde. I wonder what he had done if the shoe was on the other foot, and Clyde was the cop? Please, give me a damned break...
@hamzabro26673 жыл бұрын
If you cant serve justice, get the hell out and quit your job. If a crime happens and you cant serve justice. You're as much responsible as the criminal who did it. Nick acted as a complete shi*head every moment, never taking a man who lost everything least bit seriously. He's soo protective of his own family yet never cares what happened to Clyde's family. He plays JUSTICE with Clyde, where was this LAWMAN when you let Darby free? Justice demands that he too should suffer for his negligence and selfish behavior. This will happen if the members of Justice will not take their responsibility seriously.
@b2kzangelalwayz3 жыл бұрын
Issa movie
@jclips20983 жыл бұрын
Sadly, this is scarily accurate to real life
@devankargautam8243 жыл бұрын
Absolute truth brother...i feel the same way
@SuperZero12153 жыл бұрын
Agreed
@jabronisauce68333 жыл бұрын
He was more worried about his success rate and that's the cold hard truth about lawyers and why they're mostly pieces of crap.
@JBD9012 жыл бұрын
A man who's the most dangerous, is one who has nothing to lose.
@MrOreoMan3132 жыл бұрын
I have a theory about Sarah’s secret contact. What if it was Clyde all along? What if this was a way to stop himself from going to far? To not become the same monster that took away his wife and daughter. Or maybe a final way to make Nick to throw away his views of justice to end someone who is clearly a monster. Take this with a grain of salt, unless the movie already revealed Sarah’s contact identity.
@lennardtackett2 жыл бұрын
Sarah's "secret contact" was Chester. Well, she never referred to a "secret contact" but instead, a "friend you don't name." In fact in one scene right before her death she says that this friend had found a loophole granting them access to Clyde's corporate expenses. Then later Nick gets an email from Chester with that information.
@jacobquoir55952 жыл бұрын
Up until Sarah's death, I was kinda sure that she was the person helping Clyde out...but, now that I see your comment, your point of view seems pretty accurate
@garen591 Жыл бұрын
The part where the phone blows up the corrupt patronising judge is so good
@auraabyss50873 жыл бұрын
If I get to remake the ending, heres how it goes: After planting the bomb at the office full of governors, Clyde would not return back to his prison cell, instead he would initiate the next phase of his plan by escaping, labelling himself as wanted fugitive. Sometime later after the authorities (DA/Jamie Fox) discovered Clyde has escaped and are in process of a Manhunt. The DA just gotten a direct phone call from his family. Immediately after answering the call, the DA find out that it was Clyde who was the caller using the DA’s family number. In a panic state, the DA has gotten a grasp of his family (hostage) situation. And Clyde demands for the DA to come alone to Clyde’s location to try rescue his family. Putting the DA in a similar situation as Clyde’s, a father desperately trying to save/protect his own family. Arriving at the location (after few hours), the DA (armed) straightforwardly enters the building through the front door and found his wife and child all tied up to a chair with their mouth sealed with tape (unable to speak a word) with Clyde behind them holding 2 knives at their throats. The DA desperately tries to plead (make a deal) with Clyde, where he would voluntarily freely let Clyde kills him (to get revenge) in exchange for his family’s safety. But Clyde was not interested in that such deal. Instead Clyde would rather have a conversation with the DA (as a father and husband) while the hostages are still in the room. After some time passes (minutes), where the 2 parties have a proper conversation. Just outside the house there is a noise of police siren and vehicles approaching closer to the house. This enrages Clyde as this is a of breach against for the DA to come “Alone”. Now Clyde retaliates by attempting to slit the throat of the hostages. An enrage Clyde left himself vulnerable. Seeing an opportunity, the DA quickly act and shoots Clyde for the kill. Which lands, causing Clyde to drop dead down to floor. After the DA confirms that Clyde is dead. He quickly reunites with his family and frees them from their restraints. However (plot twist), after the DA had freed his wife. She gave him a message which was (surprise) from Clyde. The message was “how does it feel to desperately save your family?”. Realising that Clyde had orchestrated and execute his entire plans since the very beginning, this hostage situation was also one of them. Behind the scene (flashback) where Clyde is setting the hostage situation, Clyde has also prepare a remote phone call connected to the emergency service line, where it is set by a timer (Clyde strictly being precision in time). This is so that Clyde would fully staged the entire scenario during the hostage situation including the arrival of the police as it is mentioned above. In Clyde’s case he himself was a victim, where he lost his entire family to a crook and was betrayed by the DA for not serving “full” justice towards the crook. Which lead Clyde to take matter into his own hands in getting revenge at the crook and teaching a valuable lesson to the DA. Which is “how does it feel to be a desperate powerless Father and Husband (victim)?”. Clyde never intend to harm the DA’s family. His intention was to show the error of the DA’s way by fighting for what is right (black and white) instead of what is not right/wrong (grey area). And so the movie ends where the DA became a better husband and father to his family while carrying Clyde’s lessons at court.
@thelegend58173 жыл бұрын
Wouldnt mind this being the actual ending
@deathwingthedestroyer36323 жыл бұрын
There’s could also be another few endings 1) Nick learns nothing and as he goes back to his family the same thing that happens to Clyde and his wife and daughter happens to him 2) Clyde wins and escapes undetected from the cage and goes into hiding even after going off the police’s radar and goes some where’s away from the US. 3) Just as Clyde is about to make a decision after hearing Nick has learnt his lesson, Nick’s phone rings and it’s his wife and as he picks it up his wife and daughter calls out for help in quiet and panicked voice and the call ends there and both Nick and Clyde head into a car and drive to Nick’s house and get there in time before two crooks try and do what happened to Clyde’s wife and daughter.
@rendra76853 жыл бұрын
damn hope the ending just like u make, i hope they remake this film and edit..
@HandlesAreShit3 жыл бұрын
This is canon to me. 100/10
@MoneyMullard-3 жыл бұрын
I actually prefer your ending to the movie, I like how you came up with the letter Clyde had left behind proving that they would both become killers if it meant saving their family or exacting revenge.
@emdee77443 жыл бұрын
Did you know: This movie was supposed to end differently with Gerard Butler's character getting his justice. However, Jamie Foxx said he wouldn't do the movie unless his character came out the winner. I wish they had cast someone else and stayed with the original plotline. It would have been a much more satisfying movie.
@c001Ba30nDuD3 жыл бұрын
Oh so he's an ass in real life and in the movies. No wonder they continued to cast him
@clarkedawe34643 жыл бұрын
That’s not true, that’s one of the prevailing myths about this movie, unfortunately.
@calebswisher45123 жыл бұрын
God damn jamie foxx, curse him forever...
@isamoofan25413 жыл бұрын
Did you also know that there was no script? All of this was adlibbed. Truly, great actors!
@Reese4933 жыл бұрын
Who's your source?
@alichehab58042 жыл бұрын
And in the end, the detective proved Clyde to be justified in his homicidal rage. Law Abiding Citizen ends with the criminals winning.
@spentlizard3532 жыл бұрын
Even if I’m not naïve enough to call Clyde the hero because he definitely goes too far with his vengeance, Nick is also a villain for his complacency, greed, and hypocrisy.
@ChanChan-jk8pc2 жыл бұрын
Dude he raped and killed his wife and kid that guy deserved every bit of pain
@spentlizard3532 жыл бұрын
@Chan Chan I’m not talking about that guy, he deserved everything that came to him. I was just talking about the other people killed throughout the movie that weren’t involved.
@aguyontheinternet90952 жыл бұрын
@@spentlizard353 Smaller subset than you think. The only ones that didn't deserve death was that group of aids that got carbombed and the funeral goers that weren't involved with the shit that happened to clyde. Literally everybody else did something significantly incriminating where death is not out of proportion. 1. The accomplice? He could've stopped the rapist. Or at the very least not have been a criminal in the first place. 2. The judge? Literally signed to violate Clyde's civil rights because it was easier to do so than the problem clyde presented but justice isn't supposed to be easy. 3. The cellmate? Let's not forget that he literally threatened Clyde not even five minutes before he got that T bone to the jugular. Clyde made it clear that he could've killed everyone even tangentially related to the case. Sure the death sends a message, but so too does the ones he specifically spared from being collateral damage.
@BearRecaps3 жыл бұрын
I think this is the only movie that I felt the bad guy should win.
@jenniekerima88113 жыл бұрын
For real. He was the victim and he didn't even get justice.
@leltrash56833 жыл бұрын
Gerard Butlers character was the good guy , the bad guys won in this movie (jamie foxx) . Did you watch the movie right?
@norfcarolinadude81793 жыл бұрын
Everyone in this movie was the bad guy.
@andrewyangforpresident89433 жыл бұрын
Jamie Fox is the bad guy in this one. Clyde is real American Hero
@vhsninjaccoon77053 жыл бұрын
Not every character needs to win. I see his character: meant to die, and him setting an example. That; the way you deal with criminals can effect you. Clyde won in the end, not by living. But dying.
@ivanmarkpadilla48103 жыл бұрын
If I were Clyde, I would be in a full Batman mode.
@hamzabro26673 жыл бұрын
Funny thing is, Batman's justice never actually seemed to work. The criminals knew they'll break out again and the cycle starts all over again. In the end Batman had to take more serious measures to stop them. He failed at eliminating crime. All he did was to delay it.
@vaughnmckinley39683 жыл бұрын
More like Punisher
@nandinhocunha4403 жыл бұрын
Way better
@musicismoreimportantthanyo92463 жыл бұрын
@@hamzabro2667 criminals break out in another film
@Batman-dl3zn3 жыл бұрын
You mean punisher mode
@amnsbharath3 жыл бұрын
What a BS ending.
@roadwarrior1442 жыл бұрын
Justice is served only when it serves the system and those who run it, otherwise they just don’t bother. Its about how easily a conviction can be secured, even if the wrong person gets convicted. If it LOOKS like justice is served, then that is all that matters.
@cherrysmithgregorylferguso3292 жыл бұрын
Let me know mor about the movie
@TheROB0TGuy2 жыл бұрын
My all time favorite movie! Just shows you how imperfect how justice system truly is!
@vyragami33303 жыл бұрын
This movie's ending is such bs lol it's like they realized in the end that the "terrorist" winning in the end isnt exactly pretty good for publication for the movie
@nightseeker2263 жыл бұрын
Though we want Clyde to win and be free. He did win regardless by senting his message across and forcing the lawyer to break the law and kill him just because he knows he's guilty and the justice system is flawed.
@eis12433 жыл бұрын
its not about a satisfying ending, its about clyde winning. He wanted to teach Nick that the justice system is flawed and to never make deals with criminals by becoming one himself. In the end he proved his point to Nick and won by making Nick break the law.
@mikebearpig74253 жыл бұрын
@@nightseeker226 what lawyer?
@loiloi80303 жыл бұрын
At first, I thought he will kill Nick family and then let cycle begins yet what we got some kind wannabe goody shoes so yeah it was suck.
@spencerparmelee73203 жыл бұрын
"At Darby's, who's sniffing flower..." Hilarious.
@ishan99243 жыл бұрын
*Flour
@pollux_id25573 жыл бұрын
who tf calls powder cocaine "flower"
@spencerparmelee73203 жыл бұрын
I feel saying Flower was funnier. Just picturing him sniffing a bouquet of flowers
@wesswise283 жыл бұрын
I'd go with huffing dried flowers, but close enough I guess :D (Yeah, I know he was doing coke or something, not weed, just joking)
@aguyontheinternet90952 жыл бұрын
@@pollux_id2557 well that and youtube bot bullshit.
@calvincalvin31323 жыл бұрын
there's no way clyde would have been so stupid at the end. He would have known they found the bomb
@edwleo81242 жыл бұрын
I saw this movie a while back but maybe he did know.
@keirio97483 жыл бұрын
if there's one person you shouldn't mess with, it's a man with nothing left to lose
@jakequainoo52362 жыл бұрын
you just pulled a chuck rhoades
@knoxzedlav73432 жыл бұрын
and a dog with nothing to lose
@JoeMama-xk2uq2 жыл бұрын
The only thing more powerful than a man with nothing left to lose is one with everything to gain
@silverhawkscape26772 жыл бұрын
A Huwite man with nothing to lose.
@koreannom2 жыл бұрын
@@JoeMama-xk2uq a man with everything to gain is still bound by the benefits he'll get or until he gets them. A man with nothing left to lose is the more dangerous one.
@nekokami31322 жыл бұрын
"The only thing more fearsome than a man is a man that's got nothing to loose"
@davidesquivel4326 Жыл бұрын
Makes deal with murderer then says he doesn’t make deals with murderers
@kainlives79585 ай бұрын
Even worse is that he made a deal with a rxpist and pedo
@jeremiahmuli91473 жыл бұрын
The directors did a great job with the ending. It enrages the audience, leaves them feeling helpless and eager for real justice. In the sense that the viewers will despise the grayhat lawyer/DA and see how only whitehat lawyers are really morally correct.
@Gbari73 жыл бұрын
They actually changed the original ending because Jamie Foxx didn't like his character losing in the end. Pays to be the lead "actor".
@Vassilinia3 жыл бұрын
@@Gbari7 I looked into that and apparently that wasn't true at all. The ending was changed, but many films go through changes like that in development.
@bendynamic21503 жыл бұрын
You know what... Never looked at it that way if that was the intention then they nailed it.
@ShepardCZ3 жыл бұрын
THe lawyer/DA just stopped a mass murderer.
@aguyontheinternet90952 жыл бұрын
Honestly I still think it's a shit ending. Sure it can be provocative, but so is someone literally taking a shit on your desk. The only thing I think they got right was not showing Clyde's corpse/death because that means there could be a sequel. Unbelievably unlikely, but possible.
@Dotman-mn8rb3 жыл бұрын
I know that this film wasn't reviewed well when it came out, but it's a perfect case of why you shouldn't take critic's words as gospel. It's a fantastic film that is incredibly engaging to watch as it's one of the few cases you're actually rooting for the "bad" guy. It's one of my favourite movies and undoubtedly one of Gerard's best.
@aguyontheinternet90952 жыл бұрын
Honestly "film critics" are a full on inverse measure for me anymore. If a big name critic/website says a movie is terrible ESPECIALLY if they use certain keywords you can be practically guaranteed the movie will be at least meh.
@carl63522 жыл бұрын
Never listen to critics is my motto. whethe movies or resturants or political hacks!
@XoNasX3 жыл бұрын
9:56 "But Nick still thinks he did the right thing" it would be great if such an idiotic thought could only exist due to fiction, but sadly when looking at reality we can see that it's actually very plausible and happens all the time.
@bobbierobinson62699 ай бұрын
All he wants is for the justice system to really work for the victims. The only victims that see any kind of justice are people close to the government officials.
@ants22302 жыл бұрын
"Its not what u know but its about what u can prove" Damn that hits hard
@Verø.610 ай бұрын
Clyde just used the same logic against Nick that he had used 10 years prior
@ottis14113 жыл бұрын
Awesome movie with a great meaning behind it with how the justice system works. On another note I love the scene @6:07 when he really gives it to the judge.
@basamshah51283 жыл бұрын
This movie was absolutely amazing, it shows the justice system with no filters but it also shows that clyde is more of a anti-hero than anything, a man driven to spill the blood of those who were responsible for takeing evrything from him. The funny commentary and summary of this video are good as well.
@fourtimingtarantula35613 жыл бұрын
I don't know if there's a directors cut or not. But in the final scene Nick the lawyer attended his daughter's recital and the camera angle is focused on his neck tie. In the secret meeting with Clyde's associate he mentioned a hard to kill most wanted man died by a necktie. Just a what if but if there's a directors cut when the camera focusing Nick's necktie goes black there could be whirring sound indicating his neck guillotine is starting to execute. Clyde might have not known he would die but he must have prepared a conditioned weapon against Nick as he prepared for 10 years and he knew their mindset and their behavior even their schedules without being spotted.
@marcellusb59423 жыл бұрын
He didn't want nick dead, which is why he survived.
@fourtimingtarantula35613 жыл бұрын
@@marcellusb5942 Maybe since he looked very satisfied when Nick denied his deal saying he doesn't deal with killers. Maybe that was his goal since he cut out the corrupted parts.
@SelvesteSand2 жыл бұрын
Clyde didn't have an associate. He did everything himself. This was possible because of the tunnel he had dug to the prison. That's why he wanted a bed, because he could make it look like he was in it, sleeping, whenever he left his cell.
@fourtimingtarantula35612 жыл бұрын
@@SelvesteSand I meant that guy Nick and his boss talked in the tunnel. Wherein, he gave some info about Nick and the necktie story.
@aguyontheinternet90952 жыл бұрын
@@SelvesteSand That and a cell in solitary confinement because sneaking out AND BACK IN is kinda hard if you have a felon jackass of a roommate.
@megamonkey8522 жыл бұрын
The ending to this movie is SOOOOOOOOOOO unsatisfactory. A movie where the bad guys win.
@mattb9054 Жыл бұрын
The part where the judge gets blown away by the phone explosive my jaw literally dropped, I wasn't expecting that at all
@willienelsongonzalez46093 жыл бұрын
Great film! Gerrard character was well and truly driven to get revenge on the system that let him down, the so called “good guys” who failed him and the perpetrators that ruined his life. He uses all his knowledge, skills and training to prove a point even if it means he loses his own life and privileges in the process.
@Mentis-de2 жыл бұрын
He killed innocent people so he was not better than the murder of his family.
@Crackshotsteph3 жыл бұрын
Clyde should have won.
@johnstafford64583 жыл бұрын
He did...
@hamzabro26673 жыл бұрын
Ask this to your selves. What you would've done if you were in Clyde's shoes. I would've made the video public so no lowlife ever, even in his dreams would even cook up such a thing and all prosecutors, judges and cops wouldn't even dare to muster the courage to help the ones responsible. It may sound uncivilized to many, but you wouldn't understand until this happens to you. The people who cook shit up like those thieves may appear human, but i assure you they're not. And that's why they should be made examples so others never feel this invulnerable. They just had to make Clyde a psycho. So that people dont get whats the actual idea of this movie.
@LPikeno3 жыл бұрын
I do understand. Revenge is a primal emotional reaction to both prevent further loss to your tribe and to enact a basic form of justice. It is always a poor choice in regards to society, as it leads to spiralled chaos, but I wouldn't ever judge those who do as I would the ones who perpetrated the first offense.
@foltgameeing3 жыл бұрын
Interesting, so if someone raped and murdered both your wife and 8 year old daughter you would be content with him getting a five year sentence? He'll be out in 3 years. You wouldn't be upset about this because "revenge is a poor choice in regards to society". Well, i don't want to be a part of that so called society. The industrial revolution and its consequences has been a disaster for the human specie.
@wesswise283 жыл бұрын
Good idea! In ye olden times, they'd cut off your hand for stealing. I mean, let's be honest, that worked better than the threat of some jail time. Death sentence should be normal practice. Hell, if I did something to deserve it, I'd choose death over life in prison and spare everyone's time and money.
@hamzabro26673 жыл бұрын
@@wesswise28 I'll correct you a bit. First there was an inquiry on why he stole and what he stole. If he was really poor and stole for food the punishment was reduced. If not, hand were cut off so it does not happen again. And the punishment was public. As for rape, publicly hit the guy with stones until he's dead. I doubt any criminal no matter how strong will ever want that fate. The main thing is that it inspires fear in criminals and sounds pretty reasonable as well. Lets just face it, what would you do if the victim was a loved one of you.
@midamason55673 жыл бұрын
always
@eddiemedina21862 жыл бұрын
One of the greatest movies EVER!!
@DustinBarlow8P Жыл бұрын
What is so clever about the writing is that the lawyers mentor and assistant both saw the error of their ways right before they died. This showed that Sheldon's actions , while I personally thought where justified, still hindered him, because he had made real change, but his rage blinded him to see that. The mentor saying "We where so focused on victories that we lost sight of justice" and the assistant, lamenting the loss of a piece of her, when she was only ever focused on victory instead of helping people. Def pro writing by keeping their stance neutral. The whole movie was just so much Grey Area, where you can see the points from both sides of an argument. SUCH AMAZING WRITING!
@natenate22803 жыл бұрын
and in the end, no justice is served and the ball keeps on rolling
@Lunk423 жыл бұрын
I always get pissed seeing this ending. Yeah sure it could be argued Clyde was a bad guy but Nick was too making deals with monsters. Nick didn't deserve the happy ending he got.
@gopet4003 жыл бұрын
I was hoping that the bomb was a distraction and the real one was with Nicks family. Nick thinking he won finds out then kills Clyde in front of everyone, getting himself a life sentence.
@kvngcjgaming55593 жыл бұрын
Nick is literally lawyer my guy lmao that’s his fucking job you people are hella weird.
@jabronisauce68333 жыл бұрын
Didn't really get a happy ending and I doubt Clyde was ever going to kill him rather everyone else maybe bar his family since they're the innocents.
@jabronisauce68333 жыл бұрын
@@kvngcjgaming5559 Disregarding his clients wishes most certainly isn't his job he chose to protect his success rate a win for him wasn't a win for his client and his client was happy to risk it all for justice maybe if Nick put the same enegery into the case than he did hunting Clyde then maybe none of this would've happened and justice would have happened but no Nick chose not risking a blemish on his career. That's why so get off that idiotic high horse you've built yourself... A job doesn't excuse immoral actions of choices we could use every tyrants system as an example.
@SlyJohn3 жыл бұрын
You can only fight evil with evil.
@Ali1986Koksal2 жыл бұрын
This movie completely looses ALL respectability when you realise that at NO POINT throughout the ENTIRE film that no one thought to have Gerard Butler's character under 24/7 surveillance in his prison cell. I say that because everyone KNEW he was behind all of the murders so why not put camera's in his prison cell and/or have prison guards physically sit outside his cell and watch him on rotation?
@21Blankenship2 жыл бұрын
“She agrees and signs a document. Her cell phone rings and when she answers it, it blows up. They are shocked.” Lol
@DanDCool3 жыл бұрын
9:10 she had it coming for using a car when threatened after someone died via cellphone
@ukaszpaluch49503 жыл бұрын
Amazing movie with a shitty ending - said everyone ever
@kevinf.17023 жыл бұрын
The guy just proof his point.
@Reboget3 жыл бұрын
Was the revenge worth it for all buglers that took the familys life..? Yes.
@EyezofLA Жыл бұрын
When the judge's phone blew up, I lost it
@vignesh020810 ай бұрын
You know, this type of trope really pisses me off. But I guess it's more rooted in reality with how criminals get off after commuting crimes. So, when these sort of psychopaths commit heinous crimes against innocents, the lawyers and cops are like 'oh, they too deserve a fair trial', 'there was not enough evident', 'they signed a plea deal'. But when the ones who are denied justice take matters in their own hands, they're like 'you're not above the law', 'I won't rest until I've put you behind bars'. The sheer hypocrisy.!
@111111scarface1111113 жыл бұрын
This would've been an awesome Punisher type of series if they would've ended this with Clyde disappearing somehow!!! This was one of the biggest missed opportunities in Hollywood!!!
@kevinf.17023 жыл бұрын
I'm extremely disappointed.
@fg009letyrds83 жыл бұрын
Yeah, good thing there's no sequel, Jamie foxx is a turdskin narcissist.
@111111scarface1111113 жыл бұрын
@@fg009letyrds8 Well, it's not like Jamie had to be in the sequel :)
@brianalexiev13473 жыл бұрын
I wish there was a directors cut of this movie with alternate endings with Clyde completing everything he planned
@johnstafford64583 жыл бұрын
He did as he proved the DA was a hypocrite. Clyde's plan was not just to kill a bunch of people.
@CallMeKaden3 жыл бұрын
So basically the good guy dies and the bad guy walk off scot free
@Night_Raptor_59912 жыл бұрын
Yes unfortunately
@yellow_flash87822 жыл бұрын
You know makes a man dangerous? When they have absolutely nothing to lose
@aguyontheinternet90952 жыл бұрын
*and has every reason to make someone else lose.
@z-kun49082 жыл бұрын
I remember my parents watching this at home, while i was sleeping. I was around 10-11 at that time. I couldn't sleep well so i decided to go to my parents. Of course i had the best luck in the universe and I walked in, just as the burglary happend. I stood there, terrified of what happend and rushed to my bedroom. I couldn't sleep for a few days and I couldn't close my door because I was getting paranoid, thinking that these guys are going to come in and do the same things. I still remember this scene and I think it's attached in my mind. Still a good movie, I watched it after I grew older and this time, I didn't get scared more like I was rooting for Clyde.
@VikashSingh3 жыл бұрын
Except the ending of this movie everything was perfect.
@nazodreemur82843 жыл бұрын
Love how the criminal feel each cut He get what he deserves
@natestlm23523 жыл бұрын
This is one of my favorite movies to watch. Law Abiding Citzen made me like Gerard Butler because he lost his wife and child and took revenge and justice in his own way because he trusted Jamie Foxxx(Nick) from the beginning, but unfortunately cut a deal with the same killer who murdered Gerard Butler's family which pissed me off, but unfortunately Gerard Butler found and got revenge against the murderer of His loving wife and child. Jamie Foxxx should have done his job better as a lawyer, but unfortunately was too caught up in his own ego and I always felt Jamie Foxxx was a sellout because he was working with these people so that he could look better with them and was too hard headed to understand the difference between who he was and what he is. Jamie Foxxx made me hate his character because Gerard Butler's wife and child were tragically murdered and Jamie Foxxx didn't do a damn thing to help him get justice and Jamie was too blind to see that because he was trying to kiss up to these people that he was working with in the government world and throughout the movie were getting killed left to right such as his coworkers, his boss, even the female judge who was killed by answering her phone in front of Jamie Foxxx and his boss, who was killed later on during the funeral service of their coworkers who were killed in a bomb explosion at the government parking lot. Even though Gerard Butler was killed in the end of the movie, but he was the real hero because he did his own brand of justice for his late wife and child, unlike Jamie Foxxx who was the real villain. Don't get wrong, I like Jamie Foxxx and respect him, but this movie was the one movie that I didn't like Jamie Foxxx because he was too busy being a "sellout", "Uncle Tom ", in this movie because he was trying to fit in into something that he wasn't and always try to prove something to fit his own agenda to advance in life like he was going to be the head of the council or be President of the United States, which was never going to happen. Every I watch this movie, I cheer for Gerard Butler over Jamie Foxxx because not of color, but character.I never respected Jamie Foxxx throughout this movie because of his character. He always proves too much in everything like he was God, which he was not.
@wesswise283 жыл бұрын
I think that was the point of the movie. Justice and law are two different things.
@qayyumchariff43572 жыл бұрын
Fun fact: Originally, the ending was to show that Clyde won, but Foxx pushed the director to change it, I hated him since then
@kevin98608 Жыл бұрын
The ending, he walking thinking he won. His whole team died lol. He lost.
@thecentralscrutinizerr3 жыл бұрын
The first mistake people make is thinking they have a justice system. You don't. You have a legal system. And the difference between the two is as night and day.
@schyracollbrande19002 жыл бұрын
Never mess to a guy that has nothing to lose.
@TheRealFoop2 жыл бұрын
People completely miss the ending. Clyde's ultimate goal WAS NOT just revenge, but to teach a lesson, which he did. Any other ending would have completely missed the point of the movie and made it just a standard revenge film.
@Wheres_my_Dragonator2 жыл бұрын
No one learned a lesson though? Knowing Nick, he would've just kept it hush. The fact that he let that many people die and didn't personally suffer, means he was unfazed by all of it. Face it, it's a dumb ending.
@TheRealFoop2 жыл бұрын
@@Wheres_my_Dragonator By the end, Nick definitely learned a lesson from it. He may still be prideful, but he learned that he was was wrong, like your spelling of the word "unphased".
@Xtramediumdosage2 жыл бұрын
The ending shot of the movie is a zoom into Nick's tie... Earlier it was talked about how Clyde had a tie that would strangle the wearer on its own. Food for thought
@Lodreus Жыл бұрын
What I hate the most was the fact he died in the end. He deserved to live as no one went against the Justice System and so they're all to blame.
@mikedawolf953 жыл бұрын
Kind of wish there was an alternative ending where it turns out Clyde planted another explosive right under the desks or something and he succeeded and gets shot or the other explosive was still in his cell.
@ebonimom69642 жыл бұрын
This is one of my favorite movies. Saw it in theaters as a teenager when it was first released. I just hated the ending. I wished he would have survived but now as an adult, I understand now that he accepted his own death to be with his family.
@sad.brokenhelplesskid1633 жыл бұрын
To the person reading this: Even though I don’t know you, I wish you the best of what life has to offer ❤
@Moviecaps3 жыл бұрын
:3 you too cutie
@Tempest_5.8x42mm5 ай бұрын
Clyde was just so damn smart that there was no way Nick would have ever beaten him through normal means, a full decade of planning, copious ammounts of funds and more, even if Nick had seen through his grand plan, he wouldn't have been able to stop it because there wouldn't be enough time for that. The only way Nick would have ever won is through plot armour, that's just how it is.
@shannonpollard39642 жыл бұрын
The acting skills from Jamie Foxx and Gerad Butler deserves and award, also shout out to the directors, writers and producers this movie is a classic and it makes you think from all perspectives.
@Dubaroo993 жыл бұрын
Honestly I've seen this film a few times and I never realized how crazy the whole plan was. The ending pissed me off but it was a really good movie
@qron23823 жыл бұрын
Jamie Foxx was the real villain
@michaelgillett12573 жыл бұрын
Bro I remember looking for this movie for at least 6 years. Then I found it watching tv one night with my dad. I always said how much of a masterpiece this movie was. I was always on clide side the law system is messed up.
@jamboy32 жыл бұрын
Thanks for this synopsis of the movie....I was thinking about renting it.....you saved me time....thank you.
@Bigjefe9055 ай бұрын
“And to make sure Jonas is done for” 10:10 😂😂😂 Idk why that cracked me up
@SnakeRoadComicsOfficial36772 жыл бұрын
I'm with Clyde. When the Justice System fails, the people should have the right to bring true justice against both the criminal and the people that sets said criminal free.
@multilis22 жыл бұрын
"the people that sets said criminal free"... imo that one is very debatable, to try and convict without enough evidence is a gamble, may set even more free with found not guilty. The prosecutor did not make the rules, he is forced to play with them. So maybe you go after the lawmaker who made the rules... but then what about convicting people who are innocent? Or if you make illegal actions legal, risk of police state where no one has rights. Not easy way to assign blame.
@SnakeRoadComicsOfficial36772 жыл бұрын
Perhaps my comment was rather harsh. My apologies sometimes my emotions get the better of me when it comes to this kind of topic. Tho I would say that if a judge is too soft on say a rapist then then that judge should face a legal reprocustion such as a possible removal from their position.
@aguyontheinternet90952 жыл бұрын
@@multilis2 True but taking a testimonial plea deal of one of the perpetrators over the testimony of the surviving witness/victim is just dumb.
@NerdyBlue3 жыл бұрын
Honestly I was cheering for Clyde all the was I was so pissed on how the movie end
@Alipro_7703 жыл бұрын
all my respect to clyde
@YeOldeTowneCryer2 жыл бұрын
Ever notice how once in awhile you meet someone you should not have messed with? That's me".
@keithshowell66882 жыл бұрын
One of the all-time greatest movies to watch over and over again. I still hear it mentioned in barber shops from time to time like Cage and Travolta in "Face Off" guys used to bring up alot