MQ Presents :: Defending RPOs Clinic Tape

[@Leonard-B]

What about in a 3 down, jack attached, single high with a rover cover 2?; Would the same principles apply if your rover is just playing up and not a true 2 high? FS is still apexing 1&1. Also, really appreciate all the stuff you push out. This has helped me immensly.

[@MatchQuarters]

If it is single high, you're basically stacking every receiver with a full cover down.

[@ajarchambeau4342]

I love this channel. Quick Question: Does this conflict with how you're able to defend quick passing concepts. Like the last one against the Near Stack Twin Open, are you vulnerable to slant bubble, or double twin slant h back to the flat?

[@MatchQuarters]

2-Read allows your overhangs to sit in the curl. You can run different coverages to match routes too. The stack would get a modified 2 look anyway to inhibit high-lows.

[@jeffreyabbey9592]

Question For a 3-4 4-3 defense vs an RPO offense Which position on defense is the most important or staple to have?? Which level of the defense needs to be the strongest?

[@MatchQuarters]

Your overhangs. Primarily your Ni & boundary Safety.

[@jeffreyabbey9592]

@@MatchQuarters appreciate you

[@linjones4259]

Palms coverage?

[@MatchQuarters]

Palms = Cloud or 2-Read in my terminology.

[@killuminatimaccabee811]

How would the blitz and bluff technique come into play in the 4-2-5?

[@MatchQuarters]

Show interior or edge pressure. Give the O false keys. In the example of a Bluff, a loaded box only to throw into coverage.

[@killuminatimaccabee811]

@@MatchQuarters would I be too cautious if I didn't like cover 2 out of this formation? I'd prefer 3 or 4 coverage with my middle safety coming up as either a robber or someone to replace a blitzing backer. Could I take chances like that in a cover 2?