⨘ } Multi-criteria Decision Making, Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) } LE PROFESSEUR }

[@parag5644]

Explained very Simply and in the best way... Thanks a lot, Sirji..

[@Leprofesseur]

Thanks!

[@simpleChatGPT]

Very clear explanation. Can you please do a small example of a problem with sub-criteria? Thank you

[@API38]

Thank you so much!

[@muhammadasyrofialkindy8066]

Thank you sir, you explain clear and concise

[@Leprofesseur]

Glad it was helpful!

[@tatianakulikovatatiana3790]

Thank you so much for this video!

[@Leprofesseur]

You are so welcome!

[@RasheedPattan]

Hello, and thank you for the excellent explanation. I'm curious as to why you chose number six while selecting attributes. Even numbers, according to Prof. Sati, are for intermediate importance, although I believe you prefer 6 times rank. If I'm mistaken, please correct me.

[@Leprofesseur]

Thank you for message, I am not sure I understood your question, there are 7 criteria and 4 alternatives in the example explained. There may be some differences from the Prof. Satti's paper which is ok. You may follow Prof. Satti's original work as well.

[@Naruto_Uzumaki313]

@@Leprofesseur HI, when we have negative values in the alternatives, should we use the same logic in terms of beneficial and non-beneficial normalization.

[@Leprofesseur]

Take a difference, normalized values, could you elaborate more on how you are doing comparisons/calculation that you are getting negative values.