Use the code ‘ANKITLIVE’ to get Our Courses at a Maximum discount! Hurry Enroll Now : studyiq.u9ilnk.me/d/Npg4cicHxZ UPSC IAS Live GS Foundation 2025 P2I New Season Batch 2 : studyiq.u9ilnk.me/d/Npg4cicHxZ Admissions Closing on 10th July 2024 | Daily Live Classes at 6:00 PM Hurry Enroll Now : studyiq.u9ilnk.me/d/Npg4cicHxZ For any UPSC CSE course-related queries, please WhatsApp - bit.ly/wame8952084937 Super 100 GS Foundation 2025 P2I Offline Batch 3 - ORN Offline Classes Starting on 10th July 2024, 6:00 PM Hurry Enroll Now : studyiq.u9ilnk.me/d/tfgpoQuP7t UPSC IAS Live GS Foundation 2025 P2I New Season English Batch Admissions Closing on 10th July 2024 | Daily Live Classes at 6:00 PM Hurry Enroll Now : studyiq.u9ilnk.me/d/X3pZrpYKIH UPSC IAS Live GS Foundation 2025 P2I New Season Hindi Batch 2 एडमिशन की अंतिम तिथि 10 जुलाई 2024 l बैच का समय शाम 6:00 बजे Hurry Enroll Now : studyiq.u9ilnk.me/d/ogzkeFrQft UPSC IAS Long Term P2I Foundation LIVE 2026 Batch 9 Batch Starting on 13th July 2024 | Daily Live Classes at 6:00 PM Hurry Enroll Now : studyiq.u9ilnk.me/d/Lgsok33byQ UPSC IAS (Mains) LIVE Optional Batches : studyiq.u9ilnk.me/d/yDin8XnLj2
@Your-L0ver6 ай бұрын
A is answer
@imtiazakand31746 ай бұрын
Such law will encourage divorce given by women and encourage gold digging.
@sagarshetty31756 ай бұрын
just bring in UCC . this beating around bush needs to stop
@JAI-BHEEM-l7k6 ай бұрын
UCC AYEGA KATÙA ROTA REH JYEGA
@JAI-BHEEM-l7k6 ай бұрын
As Allàh i confirm
@JAI-BHEEM-l7k6 ай бұрын
@@Govvkopookkcxxcits a rare pic of Muhammď 😃captured by Israel soilders😊
@Brahministic_Mak6 ай бұрын
+1 UCC + NRC is Much much required specially with Illegal Immigrants coming from Bangladesh are flooding the Train Stations it's High time
@Brahministic_Mak6 ай бұрын
@@JAI-BHEEM-l7kThanks Dallah😭🤝
@topratedpastor79536 ай бұрын
This Decision is a MasterStroke in Reducing India’s Population😂😂
@VikramSingh-fd9uj6 ай бұрын
This will reduce the divorce and Luv Jihaad, As alimony will bring them under the Law.😂
@devobravo6 ай бұрын
😂😂😂
@Mein_tha_don6 ай бұрын
Ab ye baar baar shadi nhi karenge....agar karenge to baar baar alimony Deni padhegi
@onlineempire42046 ай бұрын
1) Anime is the father of Walt Disney 2) Candy fox is the father of Bollywood 3) Pewdiepie is the father of BTS 4) Shinkansen is the father of Hyperloop 5) JAXA is the father of ISRO 6) Japan has most Olympic medals 7) Kyoto is called technology capital of the world 8) JPY is the international currency 9) Japanese is the international language 10) Tokyo has the longest metro in the world ** It shows that Japan is the superpower in every fields 🇯🇵
@B.h-c2v-n4w6 ай бұрын
@@naruto654_Hindus are declining but Muslims not😂
@RAJRAVI08016 ай бұрын
This was needed before 70 years
@HillariousPanda166 ай бұрын
Had this decision come during Indira or Rajiv time then this wld have been scrapped and sc decision wld have been overturned ..... but still people think there is dictatorship now
@brightvision53716 ай бұрын
ये साले जहाँ जहां औरत जी बात होती है वहा शरिया कानून का हवाला देते है, जब क्राइम करते है साले तो सँविधान सँविधान चिलाने लगते है।
@Moe-Moe1216 ай бұрын
New type of beggars alimony😂😂😂. Suicide rate of males in divorce is 70-80 % what henies law...
@sarvottam40976 ай бұрын
Caste should have ended 1000 years ago and we still follow
@menarebrave036 ай бұрын
@@sarvottam4097 yesss caste and caste based reservation both needs a fullstop
@moglie1236 ай бұрын
अब इनके हिसाब से फिर संविधान खतरे में आ जायेगा 😅😅😅
@guptaji8466 ай бұрын
संविधान नहीं, चुसलाम खतरे में पड़ जायेगा,,
@Imaad-t4h6 ай бұрын
6 Sal ki Nibbi🧕🏻aur 55 sal ka bdsuart budda guhammď👺
@focus79486 ай бұрын
Inka nautanki bhut jld bnd hoga
@masalabeauty6 ай бұрын
जैसा तुम्हारे लिए आ गया था जब फेंसले हिन्दू के खिलाफ आये थे।
@ankitkumargupta5466 ай бұрын
Samvidhan khtre me hai 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
@divyamrathi2996 ай бұрын
77 years baad bhi Supreme Court mai esse case aa rahe hai .
@abiishekmahendrakar97106 ай бұрын
we one nation one law we need UCC
@WORLDISMYFAMILY76 ай бұрын
😂cry hard
@sahilsharma44486 ай бұрын
@@WORLDISMYFAMILY7Aagya k2we apne Dallah ki chaatne😂
@anthonymartino19016 ай бұрын
Yes we dalits and Shudras are Bharat majority… So UCC should be based on us not on brahmani@@abiishekmahendrakar9710
@IMAABIDI6 ай бұрын
يعيش الهند العظمى Jai Bharat from Makkah, Saudi Arabia
@ashesofhopesinabonfireofdr63416 ай бұрын
यह देश संविधान से चलेगा, जिन्हें इस्लामि कानून चाहिए वो इस्लामि देश चले जाएं। भारत में सभी को समान अधिकार हैं और सभी के लिये कानून समान रहेगा। शरीया चाहिए तो अफ़ग़ानिस्तान चले जाओ, वैसे भी उन्हें भारतीय लोग पसंद हैं।
@JAI-BHEEM-l7k6 ай бұрын
SECULARS KO KOI FARAK NAI PADEGA THEY WILL STILL SAY- HINDU KATUÀ BHAI BHAI😅
@raunaqueafroz76 ай бұрын
Haan India, Indian Constitution se chalega aur constitution me secularism hai. Jisko secularism nhi pasand wo duniya chhod do kyu ki uske liye koi desh nhi 😅
@JAI-BHEEM-l7k6 ай бұрын
@@raunaqueafroz7han to k20 ko dunia chor deni chaie fir to
@JAI-BHEEM-l7k6 ай бұрын
@@raunaqueafroz7yani muslims ko?
@cinematicbros18906 ай бұрын
@@raunaqueafroz7 i love secularism but I hate pseudo secularism and people like you
@kamalchauhans6 ай бұрын
वो पूछना था कि संविधान, लोकतंत्र, और सेकुलरिज्म सुरक्षित है या खतरे में आ गए।
@masalabeauty6 ай бұрын
जब हिन्दू लड़की मुस्लिम से शादी करती है तब भी सुप्रीम कोर्ट की ही चलेगी न? या तब सुप्रीम कोठा हो जाएगा?
@_unknown-ru2or6 ай бұрын
Supreme kotha@@masalabeauty
@masalabeauty6 ай бұрын
@@_unknown-ru2or तभी राम मंदिर बना।
@masalabeauty6 ай бұрын
@ParthNautiyal-c5n उसी की चलनी चाहिए, पर ये कुछ लोग सिलेक्टिव तरीके से देखते है यह गलत है।
@AliAshif87196 ай бұрын
Secularism is on havy security,aur religion ke law badal jaynge agar Humanity ko khatam karne aay to wo badal jaynge tumare religion bhi chalega savidhan se
@mm-fb7vv6 ай бұрын
Owaisi.. abhi bolie Jay samvidhan. Abhi 4 bibi saadi karo
@Simon128226 ай бұрын
to kya 5 vai se 1 mahila sadhi karege.
@azaibraja37046 ай бұрын
Bagwan ram ky panch baap thy ... bageshwar dham kehty hain ...abb bol kisne 5 shadiyan ki
@BiblioPhagist-mn2el6 ай бұрын
@@azaibraja3704 pigabar fuudamaad k aasli baap kon tha? Gattar putro ....
@BiblioPhagist-mn2el6 ай бұрын
@@azaibraja3704 gattar se nikla moojhub ka gattar aaulado....
@jfatherofRasul6 ай бұрын
@@azaibraja3704Muhammad ne 11 shadiya ki aur uski paas 55 randiya uske haram me thi 💯 aur wo apni bahu ke saath sota tha ! Ab bol kisne 11 shadiya ki 😂
@ashesofhopesinabonfireofdr63416 ай бұрын
4 shaadi karne waale ab 1 shaadi karne se pehle bhi 4 baar sochenge 🤣.
@Imaad-t4h6 ай бұрын
K2A be like- 😭😭😭😭
@Think_and_Reflect6 ай бұрын
Both those who prefer girl friends they can keep as much as they want 😂
@JAI-BHEEM-l7k6 ай бұрын
@@Think_and_Reflectas allàh i disagree
@AstitvaMishra-ed6fg6 ай бұрын
mtlb sudhrenge nahi 😂. Ha waise baat to sahi hai legally sirf ek se shadi karenge to divorce ke baad sirf legal wife hi alimony demand kar paegi@@Think_and_Reflect
@homosapien54426 ай бұрын
@@Think_and_Reflectso this is teaching of your family and so called AASMAANI KITAAB.
@akilsk73336 ай бұрын
This is very dangerous for man irrespective of religion... carefully chose your partner..
@Pikachu-ys8pz6 ай бұрын
Saap sa behaviour kese malum chalega?
@subhajitdas2925 ай бұрын
Yes. Men should keep all there property in the name of Trust organization.
@Pikachu-ys8pz5 ай бұрын
@@subhajitdas292 trust leke bhaag gya toh
@subhajitdas2925 ай бұрын
@@Pikachu-ys8pz Nehi nehi Trust per tumhari ownership hoga. Kiuki yea NGO firm hai. Isliye yea paisa sirf tumhari hai. But to create this Trust org it will cost Rs.75k
@Pikachu-ys8pz5 ай бұрын
@@subhajitdas292 atcha yeh baat hai Future mei kaam ayega Jo yeh comment dekhega
@yashwin_manak-zi8tr6 ай бұрын
govt. schemes : for muslims waqf board : for muslims pm awas yojana : majorly benefits rohangiyas mecca free trip : for muslims govt subsidy for minority institutions : for muslims . meanwhile hindus giving all their temple money to govt........:(
@mehak-GB6 ай бұрын
cry more
@JustMe543286 ай бұрын
Govt is useless, will not do an NRC and CAA and throw out Bangladeshis and rohingyas
@prajwaltrivedi70526 ай бұрын
@@mehak-GB we will make you cry in nearby time 😂
@indiangirl7276 ай бұрын
Hypocrisy of Indian constitution
@Think_and_Reflect5 ай бұрын
@@prajwaltrivedi7052 Mongols tried. We cried. The they joined us. We together made others cry. So try.
@pingping69676 ай бұрын
Fees to SC Lawyer✅ Alimony to Wife❌ 😂😂😂😂
@Numerical076 ай бұрын
People in some communities feel so entitled and pampered.... There's a limit to it.... Seriously
@Shivamkumar-oy4zm6 ай бұрын
What's the point of divorce if husband still need to maintain his ex wife . Isn't divorce meant to be free from responsibility of their spouse . This sense of entitlement needs to be stopped.
@JustMe543286 ай бұрын
In that case marry a working woman who can maintain herself, who files income tax on her personal income every year. Or pays property tax on her own name. In this case u need not pay any alimony.
@JustMe543286 ай бұрын
@Knowmore55555 yes but informal employment is tougher to prove, formal employment, u can just show the ITR proof or GST returns proof
@TimeWaster-kv4in6 ай бұрын
👍
@adityarao99876 ай бұрын
Dekho mere hisab se kya hona chahiye . Maximum time pe female are dependent on husband for all her necessaties so I think until she didn't remarried or it's her idea for divorce she can claim alimony . If she remarried, if she is working had a job then also she can't claim alimony . Same for Man , If he is dependent on her he can claim alimony also if woman was the one who proposes the idea for divorce then again man can claim the alimony even if she was the one who depended on him.
@akashtripathy13346 ай бұрын
yaa bro agree... doesn't matter the religion. this is wrong
@azaibraja37046 ай бұрын
A person who truly understands their own religion can never criticise other religions.
@Letsthink00095 ай бұрын
Isme religion ki baat kidr hui bhai
@ishwarsingh83036 ай бұрын
Good decision ☺️
@PAPUKUMARMOHANTA-z7h6 ай бұрын
Koi cheez buri ishleya nahi hoti ki usme burai hai ❤ balki isliye hoti hai ki wo apne burai sudharne ki koshish nahi karte ❤ love from constitution ❤
@mrpranjul77276 ай бұрын
70 saal baad SC ko justice ki yad agai
@Study-nh8ej6 ай бұрын
Joker h supreme court ....... 3 baar faisla badal diya
@ajay.446 ай бұрын
Mi"lord" hai wo
@rddelta16066 ай бұрын
Naacho mat, yeh kanoon bhi , Kabhi bhi badal saktha hain ...Aisa system hain hamaara.
@shuklabiswas7906 ай бұрын
SC had given justice in 1985 Shah Bano case . But Pappu's dad changed it in 1986 at the request of some mullah leaders .
@chandankumargupta81746 ай бұрын
Only wife sacrifice itself not husband and if husband have no job and wife have job then wife have to give maintaince to husband
@amitbhuriya15616 ай бұрын
Without divorce or with divorce 😂😂 doesn't matter they is not law 😭😭
@cosmic_aurora-t4k6 ай бұрын
True.....if wife is working then husband should do all housework A to Z,taking care of children, family and after divorce, maintenance should be given to him
@satyarthranjan70256 ай бұрын
bhai yahi tho widambana hai aj ke humare desh ki
@Sarridon6 ай бұрын
Yes, and a husband has to do all the housework and also bear the children.
@chandankumargupta81746 ай бұрын
But husband can't milking infant 😂
@bhagatsingh_19936 ай бұрын
10:32 🇶 *_Which of the following statements is_* *incorrect* *_about_* *Fundamental Rights ?* ✅ Answer:- *[🇦] New technologies may endanger these rights* *_जय हिन्द ।। जय भारत ।। वंदेमातरम् ।।_* 🇮🇳 🙏🏽
@akshaycmachappanavar37345 ай бұрын
New technologies do endanger these rights like right to privacy under Article 21.
@sachhinGB6 ай бұрын
Momin personal law/ waqf ke ❤️ Day lag gaye. जबरदस्ती, खामोखा तलाक थोपे गए Momin बहनों के लिए अपना हक मांग सके, इस नजरिये से उनके लिये अछे दिन आइये।
@rajbiswas2496 ай бұрын
Supreme court ka loud speakers pe bhi ban ka order hai,,,,, lekin kuch hua kya
@Shital_Vaishnav-l3o6 ай бұрын
@@rajbiswas249wo log koi law ko mante bhi nahi hai UCC bhi nahi manne wale wo Because they believe in Mohammad laws as supreme laws
@souvik29306 ай бұрын
@@Shital_Vaishnav-l3o bilkul sahi, ye law bas paper pe rhe jayga aur agar koi divorced woman paise magne jayegi ex-husband se toh wahi usko khtm kr diya jayga aur kisiko pata bhi nhi chalega😑
@DARKTruth176 ай бұрын
Sharia law which allows s@x with bonded women and can marry small girl child 😢@@Shital_Vaishnav-l3o
@JAI-BHEEM-l7k6 ай бұрын
Momino ka bàp here
@gauravkumargupta96226 ай бұрын
Section 125 needs to be amended. It says even if the child is illegitimate the huband has to pay alimony.
@achu10mech416 ай бұрын
If it is his child he has to pay legitimate or illegitimate
@gamingcreatesworlddd24256 ай бұрын
What kind of justice is this this is plain injustice
@achu10mech416 ай бұрын
@@gamingcreatesworlddd2425 what injustice in this??
@bonapetits6 ай бұрын
ha, baccha to hein uska na? dna test karwau aur agar baccha nikla, toh child support do
@mohammadbilal96186 ай бұрын
@@gamingcreatesworlddd2425aur Karo ucc aur support karo kal ko tu bhi apni only fans wife ko alimony dega
@rhushirajbandal78316 ай бұрын
Male a special protection act for ex Muslims.
@Aryantabade6 ай бұрын
:)
@_Moraceae6 ай бұрын
Yes
@Imaad-t4h6 ай бұрын
6 Sal ki Nibbi🧕🏻aur 55 sal ka bdsuart budda guhammď👺
@JAI-BHEEM-l7k6 ай бұрын
As Allàh i agree
@amrishkumarsharma4136 ай бұрын
Bring men protection act and laws in India
@idreeshyder6946 ай бұрын
If women are independent. Why do they want to get paid..
@idreeshyder6946 ай бұрын
@AP-zf2ep donoo..male works to generate money so that he spends it on his childs requirement.why must she get paid although it is her child also.. Then it is better to get a nanny as she won't demand lakhs..
@comedyalbums72025 ай бұрын
@AP-zf2epbaap paalega 😅😅khatam
@SahilSingh-by6jq6 ай бұрын
When will court bring gender neutral rules , and consider each divorce with logic and morality.
@raghunathbhoi38526 ай бұрын
Supreme court about Maintenance 💪 Supreme Court about Waqf Board🤐
@mohammadbilal96186 ай бұрын
Supreme court about bajrangdal🤐🤐
@putin-_-6 ай бұрын
राजीव गांधी नही वो राजीव खान था 😂😂😂😂😂
@ASPIRANT9636 ай бұрын
Tumhara baap tha wo
@frankdavis59376 ай бұрын
आप भी ख़ान ही हो चेक करो.
@mohammadbilal96186 ай бұрын
Tumhare mai to illegitimate child ko bhi alimony deni padti hai hindu kuch bolta kyu nahi iss baare mai 🤐🤐
@ankitagrahari19996 ай бұрын
Abdul is crying in the corner 🤡
@khamzat-dh2ze6 ай бұрын
I m happy
@SaadSandhu-xo5fmАй бұрын
Jesa Bindu ro Raha ha
@nasimakthar15236 ай бұрын
Sc dicission is respected but when a woman want to divorce her husband forcefully or for the reason his husband can't bear her desires. Then what shall SC's decision then..I think this law should be implemented for that woman who is divorced by her husband not by her. Other wise this law would be missused.
@mehak-GB6 ай бұрын
this law is not equally restrospective. It agree to your point that it should be for men who divorce his women only otherwise can be misused.
@Ttk000076 ай бұрын
@@mehak-GBit always get misused
@gamingcreatesworlddd24256 ай бұрын
@@Ttk00007hmm still no one cares
@gamingcreatesworlddd24256 ай бұрын
@@mehak-GBpeople needs to speak up other wise noone will listen😊
@Gyaninfinityy6 ай бұрын
Sab allah ki marzi se hota hai😊
@JAI-BHEEM-l7k6 ай бұрын
😊haan
@soldier35146 ай бұрын
@@JAI-BHEEM-l7klame
@AliaMubarak-ch1vl5 ай бұрын
Alhamdulillah
@suvasishsm6 ай бұрын
But if that women did job and seeking divorce for extra marital affairs then why that man need give her money?
@JustMe543286 ай бұрын
If u can prove this in court u may not oay
@gamingcreatesworlddd24256 ай бұрын
@@JustMe54328in Gujarat even though it was proved still that case was turned against male
@neodas47826 ай бұрын
Marriage fans, cry more 🗿
@Imaad-t4h6 ай бұрын
alla to mere pant ke andar latak rha hai apne 2 paigmbro ke sath😊
@neodas47826 ай бұрын
@@Imaad-t4htrue hai
@imddevil6 ай бұрын
😂😂😂😂😂😂@@Imaad-t4h
@JAI-BHEEM-l7k6 ай бұрын
K2O KI SACCHAI DEKHO SECULARS😃
@baktitsonnas67176 ай бұрын
@@Imaad-t4hOr koi naam he toh dedo hindu chriatian jain sabki nam dede. Dum he toh
@musafir40696 ай бұрын
फैसला बहुत ही अच्छा है और महिलाओं के हक में है लेकिन हम एक ऐसा भी फैसला चाहते हैं जिसमें अगर एक बेरोजगार पुरुष किसी नौकरी सुधा महिला से तलाक लेता है तो महिला उस बेरोजगार पुरुष को मेंटेनेंस दे।
@vks9436 ай бұрын
ये भी ठीक है l पर किसी ऐसे व्यक्ति को पहले कैसे लड़ना होगा कोर्ट में l
@anonymous108096 ай бұрын
@@vks943 Kar di na gender neutral baate ab feminists aake roingi aapke replies me
@JohneyLall6 ай бұрын
ऐसा कानून है।
@balajipandya97616 ай бұрын
All indians equal 🎉 women protect
@karanrawat59156 ай бұрын
Reality me aao bhai Mardo ke halat jyada kharab hai
@Moe-Moe1216 ай бұрын
Nice joke bilkis, asifa case exposed lindus
@ChandanMishra-ql1bi6 ай бұрын
Ignorant converts talking bout hindus, what a joke@@Moe-Moe121
@gamingcreatesworlddd24256 ай бұрын
@karanrawat5915 hmm
@gamingrepair13386 ай бұрын
@@karanrawat5915 it is a gender neutral law
@HassanRaza-n6v6 ай бұрын
Just one question if a women cheats or she gave divorce then what is the sections for these?
@Jay-rd5vs6 ай бұрын
Ucc should implement
@abhinaymuthyala54246 ай бұрын
The question is how a person is not able to pay 20k per month, how he can afford a supreme court lawyer , for whom he would have paid a few lakhs?
@achu10mech416 ай бұрын
He may got support for Religious groups
@Ttk000076 ай бұрын
Kya logic hai
@HillariousPanda166 ай бұрын
Had this decision come during Indira or Rajiv time then this wld have been scrapped and sc decision wld have been overturned ..... but still people think there is dictatorship now ....such a shame
@SujoyMondal-t1n6 ай бұрын
We want population control bill
@khabirulislam9996 ай бұрын
Ha tumhare tarah na mard baan jao
@Kharvela.-6 ай бұрын
@@khabirulislam999pakistan chala ja pakistani
@sahilsarang69456 ай бұрын
@@khabirulislam999Nhi ab ek bacche pr 1 crore ki panelty lagani chaiye baccha Paida kia to 1 cr tax bharo 😂
@cosmic_aurora-t4k6 ай бұрын
@@sahilsarang6945😂😂😂😂😂😂
@beunique61006 ай бұрын
5/6 bacche ek sath payda karne ko mard nhi bewakoof kehte hai@@khabirulislam999
@allno28496 ай бұрын
LIFE TIME ALIMONY should NOT BE THE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT 😡😡😡😡 exception with the case of some serious disability
@gamingcreatesworlddd24256 ай бұрын
Literally
@nishantraj45536 ай бұрын
This law should be made retrospective..
@ShubhOam6 ай бұрын
जब शांतिप्रिय को संविधान पसंद है तो अलग कानून क्यूँ, कहां गए नीले भाई,संविधान का meme बना दिया है 😮 जय भीम जय meme🎉
@brightvision53716 ай бұрын
ये साले जहाँ जहां औरत जी बात होती है वहा शरिया कानून का हवाला देते है, जब क्राइम करते है साले तो सँविधान सँविधान चिलाने लगते है।
@riteshshanky5286 ай бұрын
To savidhan to sabke lie h n. Fir narangi bhaiyo ko b to manna padega
@72-sq6uw6 ай бұрын
नारंगी भाई तो गौतम भी थे 😂@@riteshshanky528
@VikasVerma-r6t6 ай бұрын
@@riteshshanky528narangi bhai UCC mante hai or hare bhai nahi man rahe hai or uske piche se nile Bhai support kr rahe hai
@Think_and_Reflect6 ай бұрын
This will not affect those who prefer girl friends over wives 😂
@ALJ1HAD6 ай бұрын
Matlab ?
@Think_and_Reflect6 ай бұрын
@@ALJ1HAD Girl friends ko dump karoge tho maintenance nahi dena padega
@ALJ1HAD6 ай бұрын
@@Think_and_Reflect Girlfriends se hamein kya lena dena ? Wo to HARAM hai
@sahilsarang69456 ай бұрын
@@ALJ1HADAre ab sb chalta hai 🙏🤣
@BhootBhagao-bg7ej6 ай бұрын
Agar gf apni pe aa jaye to biwi jitna dukh de skati hai aur court ke bhi chakkar katwa sakti hai.
@CODsilentgameplay6 ай бұрын
4 shaadi walooo kaa dil tut gaya😂😂😂Much needed
@alliswell14636 ай бұрын
😂meri to abi 3 hui hai ek aur kni baki hai
@IprthmI6 ай бұрын
😂@@alliswell1463
@soldier35146 ай бұрын
@amsam3451000 asparas
@islamkapapa-i7d6 ай бұрын
@@soldier3514ghada hamara religion moksh prapti ke liye hota hai na ki 1000 aprasa na hi 72 hooro ke liye smjha
@thecupoftea41376 ай бұрын
Aur 5 shadi wale(pandav+draupadi) khush hai😂
@gopalsharma51836 ай бұрын
جئے شری رام
@virusahani80706 ай бұрын
बहुत ही सराहनीय फैसला है ❤❤
@saurabh37566 ай бұрын
After high court and supreme court he can complain in 'UN security council'😅
@IprthmI6 ай бұрын
😂
@Proximacentuey6 ай бұрын
Yes we will go UN for this💪💪
@IprthmI6 ай бұрын
@@Proximacentuey 😂
@arnabsamantaIFS6 ай бұрын
Allah pass jaiga compain karna.....😅
@mohammadbilal96186 ай бұрын
@@arnabsamantaIFStu to illegitimate child ko alimony deta hai
@shaheennawaz53906 ай бұрын
thanks to supreme court of India.. Jai Sam vidhan..
@William202476 ай бұрын
Ek person 10,000/- wife ko nahi de sakta...lakho rs. Ki supreme court fee de sakta h🤔🤔
@karanrawat59156 ай бұрын
Self respect kahte hai usse
@anonymous108096 ай бұрын
SC ko ek baar fees deni hoti hai wife ko har mahine deni hogi
@Connect.with_me6 ай бұрын
Hyy Hallah 😢😢😢 Chuslam khatre me 😢
@Proximacentuey6 ай бұрын
Power dekha na itna sal laghu nahi karne diya😂😂
@amitnakesh0076 ай бұрын
Khatre ma nai Khatane ma h
@ChandanMishra-ql1bi6 ай бұрын
😂
@Dilipkumar94-rh5ml6 ай бұрын
Option:D Both A&B
@LEXCORPUz4 ай бұрын
Well explained sir!🫡
@UmakantMishra6 ай бұрын
Well explained ❤❤❤
@P903766 ай бұрын
Chhoti si bat ko lamba karke 10 minute krne ka talent study IQ se better kisi ke pass nhi h😂
@hackerrank91736 ай бұрын
Needed this 75 years ago...
@AskTrendy6 ай бұрын
Agr aurat dusri shaadi krle fir kahe ka bhatta ye rong h
@RIO-jp8mp6 ай бұрын
Sir.. What about For tribal people....??? Specially Nagaland state...??? As most of time we only follow customary laws which is protected under article 371 A
@BhootBhagao-bg7ej6 ай бұрын
Sc has made alimony fundamental right so tribals will have to follow. + Tribals are not a religious group so their personal laws should be defined in Hindu personal laws.
@islamkapapa-i7d6 ай бұрын
St ke liye nhi hota kyuki they have special status
@Moe-Moe1216 ай бұрын
New type of beggars alimony😂😂😂. Suicide rate of males in divorce is 70-80 % what henies law...
@JustMe543286 ай бұрын
Marry working woman with legal income who files Income tax or GST returns every year. Problem solved
@mohduvesh37576 ай бұрын
"And whoever does not judge by what Allah has revealed - then it is those who are the disbelievers." -Quran(5:44) "And whoever does not judge by what Allah has revealed - then it is those who are the wrongdoers [unjust]." -Quran(5:45) "And whoever does not judge by what Allah has revealed - then it is those who are the defiantly disobedient." -Quran (5:47)
@AmitYadav-tv9fc6 ай бұрын
i think option A is incorrect, Simultaneously, I think the wording of the second option is wrong...What do you think..??
@pingaldas8026 ай бұрын
Great verdict by our ❤Court.
@sanimishra-t5h6 ай бұрын
pahli bar accha kam kiya
@Leader-cb9ls5 ай бұрын
What if the women cheats on man? What if she was divorced because of cheating? Or extra martial affairs
@RONIT8486 ай бұрын
IF WOMAN CONNECTED EMOTIONALLY TO HUSBAND , MAN ALSO CONNECTED EMOTIONALLY SO WHY ASK FOR ALIMONY, HE WAS PAYING WHEN MARRIAGE WORKING , NO MARRIAGE = NO ALIMONY
@thepanautishow44356 ай бұрын
चलो अब खेती को खाद पानी मिलता रहेगा😂😂😂😂😂
@Tearsofsoil6 ай бұрын
Owaisi will now cry rivers of tears that their deen is being attacked by indian state 😂.. just bring in UCC. We want a modern genderless uniform civil code for all based on principle of equality and humainatarianism. Period.
@reasonablereasoning54256 ай бұрын
It's good that this time government is different otherwise till now a draft would have been prepared to overturn this judgement 😂😂😂
@noonesd56 ай бұрын
As per SC philosophy, Only unemployed wife or divorced wife will get maintenance fee ?
@mitchimir59736 ай бұрын
Is it applicable on devorced working women as well
@NM-mq6xw6 ай бұрын
Ans A
@NarutoUzumaki-nn9jc6 ай бұрын
Isme koi momina ladki nahi bolegi ki sharia chahiye 😂😂😂
@MBSYED6 ай бұрын
Han han niyog chahie sirf😂
@sumeru07286 ай бұрын
जर्मन कोकरोच वीडीयो की स्क्रिप्ट लिख रहा होगा कि दोस्तो अब्दुल का कितना शोषण हो रहा है
@rahulnarang20966 ай бұрын
sir please reply if. a woman is already getting a good salary from its jobs either gov. or private then she is eligible for maintenance after divorce?
@criticalthinker57646 ай бұрын
This decision shows the importance of diversity . A Christian judge was part of decision .
@arshadinamdar40346 ай бұрын
🤔Jabtak wo ladki dosri shadi nahi kar leti tabtak dena hoga🤔 😂main bolta hu jabtak wo ladka dosri shadi nhi kar leta tab tak ladki ko bhi ladke ko bhatta dena hoga q k ajkal ladko se ziyada to ladkiyo ko job mil rhi hai har ek sceem ladkiyo k liye a rhi hai sala ladko ka to koi wajood hi nhi raha 😂😂🤔
@monalika_bhadauriya6 ай бұрын
Pichhe chhorne ke baad v pichhe nhi chhor paya.....😅 8:21
@PrakritySharma_sriradhe6 ай бұрын
Good 👍
@prakharsharma49086 ай бұрын
या अल्लाह रहम फरमा😟😟😟🤫
@PKMKB726 ай бұрын
Ye le 😂😂😂
@Imaad-t4h6 ай бұрын
alla to mere pant ke andar latak rha hai apne 2 paigmbro ke sath😊
@aviatorboy196 ай бұрын
😂😂😂😂 indian me Sharia nahi chalega
@TrendHarmonix6 ай бұрын
@@Imaad-t4hteri pant me jo latak rha h wo sh***v l**g h😂
@AdolfRizzler416 ай бұрын
Sahi hai bhai😂
@thenazeer094506 ай бұрын
I think its when woman has child isn't it ? It is all known. Or does court says it mens responsibility of woman expenditure even after divorce ? How would man meets his expenditures when he starts his new life ? May be court need to realize marriage is a legal procedure.
@thenazeer094506 ай бұрын
Appease! So judgment is like man must make pay for woman who is no longer in any kind of relationship, thats robbery. Is it men responsibility even after divorce, its like its men responsible for all woman needs. For sure there is religious touch to this judgment. Hope some from govt would take mens respobility & provide them maintenance 😂😂😂😂😂😂. Mens are all alone, feeling sorry for men. Pay 20k every month to ex person even though they are not part of your life & no input from her side 😅😅😅😅😂.
@Kiri6566 ай бұрын
I got one question, till when the man should stop giving alimony to his ex - wife ?? Like even if he is in different relationship now or even if she is in different relationship?? Or is it like till death??
@rpnew16 ай бұрын
We are slowly going towards UCC, but we need to go fast. We can't lose so many years of India's crucial time to become no#1
@sssssssssssss6546 ай бұрын
We Indian are waiting for UCC
@coolsingh57726 ай бұрын
Talak hogya or ekmust rakam court k through dey di or fir talaq final or ab talaq k baad zindagi bhar usko paisey dete rhengey kya
@mohdkamran36016 күн бұрын
Yhi sawal mera h
@chandankumargupta81746 ай бұрын
10:33 A is TRUE answer
@sachinkumar_10296 ай бұрын
Any argument why B is true ?? Ig B is also incorrect.
@paniendernnv6 ай бұрын
Congratulations to the women who benifit out of this
@ztv83836 ай бұрын
Aur phir woh aurat talaq k baad pichle pati se alimony le aur new pati ya bf k sath enjoy kare.. waah re kanoon. Ab to aurat khul kar talaq legi independent rahegi aur phir paisa bhi lengi bindas. SC ko bolna chahiye tha ki lumpsum amount deke clear krlo na ki har mahina dete raho.
@Cunnybapist6 ай бұрын
Ye sirf unke liye jinke husband ne apni wife pe cheat kiya hai ya phir mara hai aur zabardasti usko abuse kara hai agar vo taab divorce leti hai taab ye apply hoga otherwise Agar aurat ne cheat kiya toh nahi dena padega
@anishdevvrath6 ай бұрын
चुंबी घाटी सिक्किम के किस भाग में है? Ans -
@Puzzle_Planet16 ай бұрын
Supreme court is reviving
@AJ.....4406 ай бұрын
Pure desh me UCC lagu honi chahiye or waqf act khatam honi chahiye...
@Divyaशर्मा6 ай бұрын
Hn but false cases ke wjh se...kisi bhi nirdosh admio ko na bhugatna pdd jaye .. Clarifications should be mentioned.
@dlssgamershorts6 ай бұрын
😂
@Ttk000076 ай бұрын
No one care
@comedyalbums72025 ай бұрын
Yeah its true that most women's are not trustable 😅
@comedyalbums72025 ай бұрын
Its true
@madhulikadwivedi38896 ай бұрын
B) They're superior to ordinary laws
@Akhilkashyap016 ай бұрын
Any momina here share your thought
@katukutuburo6 ай бұрын
This will not restrict men to have multiple wives.....Men will be men....
@PAPUKUMARMOHANTA-z7h6 ай бұрын
Koi cheez buri ishleya nahi hoti ki usme burai hai ❤ balki isliye hoti hai ki wo apne burai sudharne ki koshish nahi karte ❤ love from constitution ❤
@subodhsingh35896 ай бұрын
Wo to supreme Court ko mante hi nahi h.... Wo to aasmani kitab ko maanenge....
@missafy73106 ай бұрын
Hn...Mujhe agar milega bhi to mai charity kr dungi😂 Mai kyu kisi se paise lu jisse mera talluq tut chuka hai
@akashchetry6646 ай бұрын
Thank you honorable supreme court
@ikp51596 ай бұрын
Why to oppose if you do not want alimony do not take ...why you want supreme court to take back law this is Bharat not Islamic country Supreme Court is supreme