My Two-Pronged Test on Montana Megaliths: Man-Made or Natural?

#megalithic #alternatehistory
Please subscribe and turn on notifications [🔔] so you don't miss any videos.
Patreon: / curiousbeing
www.buymeacoffee.com/curiousbeing
Instagram: curiousbeingtina
Twitter: / curiousbeing15
Montana Megaliths is an impressive rock complex with towering dolmens, giant polygonal granite walls and other interesting features. It is considered by some as a man-made advanced megalithic site in North America, which is significant, because that would put the Montana Megaliths alongside the Giza pyramids, Sacsayhuaman, Longyou Caves, Yangshan quarry and other highly precise megalithic sites around the world.
Many of these renowned ancient megalithic sites, reveal high-tech machine marks, which have been proposed to be created by a prehistoric industrial level civilization from tens of thousands of years ago. These massive ancient stone structures and caves exhibit evidence of sophisticated construction and/or excavation capabilities that rivals or even surpasses our modern ones. The curious thing is that the recognized precise megalithic sites are found in North Africa, Eurasia, and South America, but none have ever been discovered in North America. Thus, if the Montana Megaliths is really an ancient man-made stone structure, it would be the first such site in North America.
Yet what if the Montana Megaliths are the result of natural geologic activities, which formations are shared with many similar rock configurations all over the planet? This commonality in form and structure is also found in the famous Gornaya Shoria megaliths in Siberia (many have seen photos of it), the Saskatchewan megaliths in Canada, and the Kaimanawa wall in New Zealand - all of which are highly likely to be natural and not man-made.
In this video, I’ll present side by side comparison photos of these sites and natural stone bodies. Considering that photos/appearances might not be sufficient to make the judgement, I also came up with a simple two pronged test to separate the natural and artificial megalithic complexes. Once we clarify which megaliths are the real remnants of the previous highly developed civilization, we can focus on and study these areas to get a better picture on this megalithic society.
The playlist of my videos on ancient advanced megalithic sites:
• Ancient Megalithic Sit...
References:
www.researchga...
www.galacticfa...
pubs.geoscienc...
This is my KZbin Channel “Curious Being.” I have diverse and interesting topics to share, such as lost civilizations, prehistoric cultures, megalithic sites such as the Great Pyramids, Petra and lesser-known ones, NDE, DMT, aliens/UFO/UAP, and other related fascinating studies. History vs. Mystery revealed! Thank you for watching.
Photos and films came from online sources.

[@Maxpower50000]

Finally, I’ve been waiting for your take on these structures! Always the best, creative and objective perspectives.

[@CuriousBeingbyTina]

Much appreciated!

[@thatcanadianwhitetrashguy]

There is a magnetic Test that can tell You if it's man made or not. check my post above@@CuriousBeingbyTina

@@CuriousBeingbyTina Thank you for your detailed work. I don’t know anyone else who researches these things in such a way.

[@CuriousBeingbyTina]

@ Glad that you find my work helpful 🙂

[@montanamegaliths4842]

@ The conclusions in this video are flawed. The MM have been proved to be ancient authentic intentionally constructed sites by the most advanced technology...satellite deep geoscans and by several experts who have been here with boots on the ground. kzbin.info/door/dFeIhHZdjebI7WPgN-guhQ?app=desktop

[@peteneblett9344]

Youre absolutely right (and your video superb). Several points: 1. I lived next to The Dells for 4 years, climbed that wall you showed untold times, and its natural. And over a billion years old, has sharp GIANT feldspar crystals (multiple scars on my hands, 15 years later), and is amazing enough as is. Just appreciate the rock, people. Which leads me to: 2. There ARE megalithic walls. But going LOOKING for them encourages false identification. Dont give fodder to the sceptics!!! A "maybe" where its a maybe, not "OMG I FOUND ANOTJER WALL!!!". If we call everything vaguely wall-shaped a wall, we destroy our own credibility. 3. Possibility breeds thought, certainty kills it. Certainty 'for' or 'against,' each are equally poisonous to thought. 4. The Flemish Bond! Strongest brick layout, because every vector had been braced. The opposite of stacked grid. And THIS IS YOUR BEST POINT!!!!! The walls of Peru, Lebanon, Anywhere: no joints in a line. Not just the face, but EVERY SIDE of the stone, and yo7 have an earthquake resistant wall. The blocks literaly fall back into place. 5. The reason we have no massive structures is the same reason as Carolina Bays, and the same reason why my current home in Maine is sitting on 250 feet of Canadian soil, hundreds of miles from the border: a series of melts and floods and impacts SO MASSIVE its difficult to imagine. Its why ALL our megafauna (except the Pronghorn) got wiped off the map too. This helps me picture it: Look at Maine, on a map. Imagine the Hudson Bay flowing scross it, depositing sediment. Imagine covering the ENTIRE STATE WITH 300 FEET OF SOIL FROM QUEBEC. Which, basicly , is us. Theres 400 foot deep circular craters offshore here, vertical walls, gaping maws in the silt. In places, the ocean floor looks like Swiss cheese. All from methane generated from the decay of "organic matter" trapped during the floods. Thats a LOT of plants. And animals. And if there WERE a civilization, theyre buried there, too. Sorry to ramble! Ive enjoyed your vids for awhile, and I have to say its very refreshing to see someone else with as much curiosity, as well as logic and skepticism, as myself. Well done.

[@chrisstanmore-major5889]

Just up the road from you in Nova Scotia. Great points regarding our geology.

[@VenturaIT]

It's the other way around, most of the natural formations are actually man made.

[@peteneblett9344]

@VenturaIT While I disagree, I'm fully aware that I'm potentially way off, regarding monolithic structures. Just wanted to say it's good to see discourse with respect I really appreciate that. And honestly, I *hope* I'm wrong, haha. If having to eat my words means discovering a vast and advanced ancient civilization, I'll be wrong all day! Take care, bud!

[@peteneblett9344]

@chrisstanmore-major5889 Hey, a Newfie!!! 😁 Greetings friend! I do love geology. Started with prospecting for gold with my dad in California as a means to an end (where's the gold?), but there's so much cool minerals and gemstoneS, not to mention that every rock is a story. Traveling, place of formation, etc. One of these days I'm going time some tourmaline. And now I'm rambling again, but thanks for saying hi!

[@VenturaIT]

@@peteneblett9344 You can do scientific tests on it through Professor Davidovits and they can tell in most cases if it's manmade geopolymer or if it's natural stone... it's not possible to cut stones to fit like that... they've already done scientific tests using electron microscopes and magnetic resonance and other tech to confirm that the pyramid blocks were man made natural stone concrete called geopolymer also the puma punku megaliths... the recipe for the geopolymer is refered to on a nearby stella that talks about baking bread... since it's similar, you need the correct recipe and the correct mixing order and timing, like baking a cake or baking bread... again, it's not possible to get natural stones to look like that and it's not possible to cut stones to fit like that, and it's statistically improbable to have nature crack stones like that... geopolymer natural stone concrete can be made out of almost any natural stone... we are just rediscovering this. You can contact the Geopolymer Institute in France to order their textbooks about the science, they also have a website and videos on KZbin. Once you understand how geopolymers work it's just makes so much sense and you can see how they used it en masse all over the world, like kids used Playdough.

[@marcjeffers4229]

The machine marks alone prove that there was a highly advanced global civilization before the flood 🤔

[@CuriousBeingbyTina]

Yes these machine marks are hard to deny.

[@ahrenryan2349]

What scientist says it was made by machines Did that scientist bring a metal detecting microscope

[@mind-guider]

definately one of the best, unbiased and indepth researchers on youtube, you deserve millions of views... keep it up girl you rock ;)

[@leppad]

Congratulations on your insightful analysis. I am a geologist and I find it very refreshing that you gave such careful thought to natural versus manmade stone features. You are a keen observer.

[@CuriousBeingbyTina]

Wow, thank you! I appreciate your support :-)

[@jeffjeff4477]

Hello 👋 Tina Good vid! Symmetrical shapes, patterns ..... are all around us, naturally occurring in nature, down to the molecular level, ice crystals , crystals, leaves, tissues, rocks, minerals , even slices of metal meteors have incredible patterns. These megaliths are quite certainly natural. Loved seeing the cave , grottos, ancient machine markings at the start... Those were super cool and very good!!!!! Nice T !! Thank You again ⛱️😎

[@CuriousBeingbyTina]

Good point - thank you Jeff! Have a great weekend :-)

[@erikbelloni1502]

At Sage Wall if I’m not mistaken, they found some stone blocks with nobs like in the most popular megalithic sites around the world. To me is man made, also hundreds of thousands of years of erosion may have changed the way the pattern looks. About their functionality, I believe we do not have the specific time reference to understand their purpose. Not Natural to me 😮

[@richarddullum2373]

This video only shows a very small part of the 275' of the Wall. There could be as many as five or six walls across the top of Sage Mountain, from the drone videos by Mike Collins and others. Sage happens to be still standing. The time aspect you mention is appropriate, in light of some new evidence of humans in N. America. A moccasin-print(size 7) in a 1.2 MYR BP basalt boulder was found in Portland, Oregon. This is real, solid evidence, to be sure. You can see the outline of the fifth metatarsal base. It's private and in a safe. Only modern humans are known to use footwear. I would recommend you look up the Pleistocene Coalition; we have been this into era since 2009.

[@erniemajor]

It feels like we are still missing something. Which kind of 'man' are we conjecturing in 'man-made' hypothesis? How long ago? How much has the surrounding terrain changed? Beavers can build, birds can build, termites can build. What ELSE might have been capable of building for reasons we are unable to understand.

[@NWDestroy]

sulurians

[@WatiSusu]

Yosep Priyangga Mukti adalah buyut dari Mbah kamituwo Kanimin, Mbah Saminah, Mbah Bonawan, Mbah Suratin, Mbah Diran, Mbah Moniah, Mbah Lasirah, Mbah Marso. Yosep Priyangga Mukti adalah canggah dari Mbah Kerto Lesono, Mbah Sungkem, Mbah Dirah, Mbah Sodimedjo, Mbah Karjo dimedjo, Mbah Rasinah, Mbah Surokarjo, Mbah Siyam, Mbah Markiteng, Mbah Menthik, Mbah Iro Medjo, mbah waginah binti sonto medjo, Mbah Baniyah, Mbah Tokromo, Joyo Japan, Sukinah. Yosep Priyangga Mukti adalah Wareng dari Mbah Joi Kromo, Mbah Manis, Mbah Soikromo, Mbah Katinah, Mbah Gendhu, Mbah Kaminem, Mbah Nadi, lurah sutokaryo, lurah sorejo, eyang karangjati, sonto medjo, joyokromosapi, mertodrono. Udheg udheg dari palang kromokaryo, merto dropo, ponco blimbing. Gantung siwur dari bagus sudarmadji ketok jenggot.

[@automaticmusicm]

I've always held the view expressed in this video. Thanks for explaining it in such a concise and logical way. Well done !

[@CuriousBeingbyTina]

Glad you enjoyed it! Thank you for the support :-)

[@christopher3d475]

Those hexagonal columns are in various parts of Washington state. I've seen them many times driving through the area. I've been skeptical of the claims made about the rock forms in Montana being man-made, they look a bit too organic to me. Have you looked into the claimed pyramids of Alaska that are supposed to be half buried in snow/glaciers?

[@CuriousBeingbyTina]

No I haven't. I'll look them up!

[@jameshaddix4048]

Mother Nature does a good job

[@andrewruiz7894]

She sure does. Imagine a glacier, pummeling a megalithic structure. How do you think it would look after? That's the angle I would take. Has anyone done any digging there?

[@michaelnorthan5981]

Excellent content! Well organized, well presented, and very interesting. Very well done!

[@CuriousBeingbyTina]

Thank you kindly!

[@AgelessRock888]

Good research🧐. Good argument 🤓. But I think if it is flat on the ground, it is very likely natural. But a wall is a wall. Megalithic walls are all over the world. It is neither manmade nor natural, that's why it is still a mystery.

[@craigcampbell6690]

Hi Tina... wandering wolf has done a few videos in Montana..The things is , there are megalithic Knobs on some.. maybe built by Neanderthals ,or an extinct species or Sasquatch..maybe they were built 250 thousand years ago, or more . Glaciers might have taken some other stuff away. Brien Foerster just shared megalithic polygonal walls from Easter Island.... once again, the joints are perfect..why were they built 🤔.. the Amount of work that was put into the Inca Trail (Peru) is amazing And , Machu Picchu & Sacsayhuaman are Beyond Incredible... Why so much work ???.. ALIEN'S👽😎.. maybe🙂

[@standingbear998]

complete BS. the 'joints' are not perfect. so 'bigfoot' went from building these to building nothing?

[@CuriousBeingbyTina]

Thank you Craig. I think the knobs might be concretions or other natural geological features.

[@finnmccool4943]

These are definitely natural. I live in Montana, these geologic formations are all over the place. My kids play on them all the time.

[@CuriousBeingbyTina]

Thak you for the information!

[@ahrenryan2349]

Probably made from ice and glaciers

[@Dutch1954]

Welcome back, another great examination. I appreciate the way you approach a situation with an open mind. That helps me in my own considerations in this very wide field of ancient times.

[@CuriousBeingbyTina]

Great to hear!

[@mikekaye7922]

When I first saw some of those photos, especially Gornia Shoria(sp) Russia I thought they could be Megalethic, but somewhat degraded because they were even more ancient. But after seeing more photos, somewhat later, I determined they were natural. It hurts the argument for advanced civilization with academics when people take advantage of the appearance in a few photographs to suggest a naturally occurring formation is actually a man made structure. Nice work on the video.

[@javiergarza8626]

If you look at more sites gornia shoria. You'll see that it might have been built by humans and used what was already there and improved on it. There's even a pic out there with a disc that has 3 or 4 stone statues that resemble a gorilla. Use Google maps to find this picture

[@stig]

I can show you a bunch of megalithic terraforming activity throughout North America all along the colorado river and the continental divide both. Trust Me.

[@Cardioid2035]

Something deep in my intuition tells me there once was megalithic structures in North America before the younger dryas period. I think we don’t find megaliths in North America today due to the ice sheets scrapping a layer of the landscape clean off and depositing everything down near the scablands or adjacent oceans on either side of the continent. It’s nothing more than a feeling but it’s a strong one

[@macgonzo]

How old was the North American ice sheet? More than 2.5 million years. Early humans hadn't even left Africa at this time! Your claims cannot be true.

[@Cardioid2035]

@@macgonzo Well based on oral tradition and certain mythologies from aboriginal people located near/ around megalithic stone works near Mexico all the way down to Peru they claim certain sacred places inhabited by their ancestors where ‘discovered’. Or built by the ‘gods’. These stories are more common in Peru in places like sacsayhuaman. So every time I see multi-ton, interlocking, mortarless polygonal stone masonry globally sharing undeniably similar characteristics I can’t help but sense such masonry is indicative of a time when perhaps humanity was in fact globalized in pre-history. This polygonal masonry in question is found in Mexico, Egypt, Turkey, Italy, Polynesia, Japan Etc… Everywhere except North America. Given that we cannot satisfactorily replicate such feats of megalithic architecture to an exactitude even today, it really does infer a pre-younger dryas chapter of humanity lost to time. So that’s why I deeply believe there’s likely heavily eroded megalithic masonry under layers of sediment at the bottom of the oceans on either side of the North American continent. Or… basically the type of stuff we see in Saskatchewan and Montana

[@islandmonusvi]

Logically…discovery of a unique polygonal natural wall could inspire ancient builders to disassemble the structure top-down …trim the blocks during transport …and subsequently reassemble them bottom-up …as required.

[@CuriousBeingbyTina]

That's a good point.

[@johndelong5574]

Post flood sediment, (all sedimentary rock is a result of global flood) remained soft enough to carve record of preflood events including ark motifs inverted boat hull (lotus flower). Petrification turned these shrines to stone that is harder than copper tools.

[@SeaLevel211]

global flood? LOL, you cannot be serious. The earth is not a globe. there is NO QUESTION that the Holy Spirit authors of Scripture believed in a stationary, circular, flat Earth, set on pillars, under a dome, within which the sun, moon and stars were placed on Day 4. Even highly respected Biblical scholars and Ancient Near Eastern language experts and historians agree (whether they personally believe in it or not) that this is an indisputable fact. Only those who are not being intellectually honest with the text (and themselves) will disagree. Like it or not - accept it or not - the Bible IS a Flat Earth book. Yet, we are constantly shown impressive "signs and wonders" that are "in the heavens" coming from antichrist organizations like NASA, which directly contradict the Biblical model.

[@danontherun5685]

She must read everything 24/7, in any case wonderfully concise but easy to understand diction.

[@Johnrack]

Thanks for covering this topic Tina. I’ve only recently become aware of these walls and don’t know much about them.

[@CuriousBeingbyTina]

Glad that you enjoyed it :-)

[@keithhowell4138]

There are walls around Angkor Wat that have continuous vertical jointing ,,much have fallen but much is still there ,, It amazed me they were built that way instead of overlapping joints like in modern brickwork ,,

[@jean-pascalpillot6540]

Very clever and simple criteria ! Very interesting as allways. Thank you Tina.

[@CuriousBeingbyTina]

Glad you enjoyed it! Thank you for watching :-)

[@zanenobbs352]

Great to see you on here again! Excellent video on a very intriguing subject. Thank you!

[@CuriousBeingbyTina]

Glad you enjoyed it! Thank you for the support :-)

[@machinethesun9243]

Things don't make sense if you look at them through today's criteria and lens. There's all kinds of ancient structures on top of remote mountain tops that seem impossible to build and pointless if you look at it from today's concerns.

[@belavarplaniie8933]

Agreed

[@cmoorejack]

Great video and presentation…keep up the good works 👍✌️

[@CuriousBeingbyTina]

Thank you! Will do :-)

[@toni4729]

We know that stones have been carved weighing more than a thousand tones and moved distances in history. No one knows how this has been done. Until some excavation of many of these sites are done, we will never prove it, one way or the other. Where, for instance did all the stones of the pyramids come from and how were they assembled? It will remain a mystery for a long time.

[@tucker5068]

One day the world will see your greatness. Keep up the great out of the box thinking

[@CuriousBeingbyTina]

Interesting - thank you for sharing with me.

[@birdywi5924]

As the Videos from Wandering Wulf show, there are a lot of machine marks, perfect holes and nobs. Also, the wall is absolutely(!) straight built - and its MAGNETIC like the stones from Tuma Puncu. No way this wall is made by nature. Regarding the time frame, we should have a look in history, when glacers covered the area. This gives another hint why a) the stones seem to be much elder than their counterparts e.g. from the Eastern Islands and Peru and b) why the whole area is covered with megalith stones without a similar structure.

[@JeremyLeighton]

It also appears they go much deeper underground

[@jimmyrox8835]

Excellent video as always,! Tbh , I've been skeptical of the Montana megaliths for a while now. . I just learned about the, Megalithic Monuments of New York // Balanced rock at North Salem // Stone Chambers of Putnam County. Not your typical megalithic sites , but interesting all the same. There are definitely ancient structure's in America at the sites I listed in this comment though.

[@CuriousBeingbyTina]

Thanks for sharing! I have passed by a big dolmen at North Salem - very interesting indeed.

[@davidvomlehn4495]

Nice--a clearly stated and pretty objective framework for classifying rock assemblages. Worth applying in other areas, as well. The load bearing part of the test doesn't directly apply to non-load bearing features such as the Bimini "road", but even roads must follow certain patterns if they are to last.

[@andrewdavidson5209]

Again you are correct Montana megaliths etc are natural...... climbed those in Cornwall as a kid..... drove Dad mad !! Ha ha ha. I LOVE your 2 criteria Superb, so simple Andrew

[@kananaskiscountry8191]

thank u Tina, hope everything has been going great for u. thank u for coming back on 🌹🌹👍🏼👍🏼🎶🎶

[@CuriousBeingbyTina]

Thanks for listening :-) I hope all is well with you too!

[@mrhassell]

The Kaimanawa Wall, located near the southern end of Lake Taupo in New Zealand, is an intriguing structure. Composed of megalithic blocks with symmetrical corners, it's puzzled scientists and historians. Some even have speculated, this might be evidence of a pre-Māori civilization. However, the truth is in fact less mysterious: the wall is a natural phenomenon. The blocks are fractures having formed over 330,000 years, which began as the rocks cooled, and is a continuing process that can be observed. They look like somebody had purposefully built them but looks can be deceptive, as we all know.

[@westho7314]

Existing natural design elements in so many forms are undoubtably the original inspiration for the advent/invent in creating concepts of geometry leading to reproduction of element design incorporated into both construction methods & cosmetic embellishment. Studying the natural fissures found in massive remnants of exposed granitic cores of solid batholithes, grabens and other more layered sedimentry rock that's often layed down in consistent symmetrical layers & fractures often at right angles that seem to be deliberate or human made. It' as simple as something like the pedals of a flower could have been the original visual inspiration for the spokes of a wheel.

[@richardliles4415]

I find your two prong system quite compelling. Thank you Tina.

[@CuriousBeingbyTina]

Thank you :-)

[@MB-hx9sz]

You're probably right but on the Montana site you can also find drillholes which are not recently made

[@johndelong5574]

Scoop and trowel marks found at various megalithic sites, indicte the stone was still soft before petrfication occured.

[@Cardioid2035]

I think about this observation all the time tbh

[@vulpesvulpes5177]

Let’s call this “Tina’s’ dichotomous key for the identification and verification of megalithic structures”. I agree with you. Natural. Moreover, all the existing man made megaliths occur in areas that were not subject to glaciation at the last maxima. We must recall that at the last glacial maximum a two mile thick sheet of ice extended about half way down North America. This would cover Montana and all of Canada. Such moving ice would leave nothing in its path standing. The same is true in Europe. So the existing megaliths occur only in areas not covered by ice. Presuming that these are so old as to predate the younger dryas. If, as is believed, these are newer, coming after the younger dryas, then population distribution or the lack thereof supports a natural phenomenon. The ice overburden also provides a mechanism for the fracturing process you point to, known as elastic dynamic fracturing of bedrock. Geologically speaking slower tectonic forces fold bedrock and result in the metamorphic rock type know to geology with its pressure folded rather than fractured nature. Imagination seems to set us apart from the other creatures. But sometimes we get carried away with our imagination. Someone has to pull us back to terra firma. Today that someone is you. Lucky us! Fox out

[@CuriousBeingbyTina]

Great points Fox. Well said! You have a wonderful evening :-)

[@vulpesvulpes5177]

@@CuriousBeingbyTina In the fur trade a foxes ears were referred to as “points”. Somehow I suspect you were not complimenting my handsome ears, but rather the content of my comment. One test of “intelligence” is how much someone agrees with your opinion. You may color me a “clever fellow”. Seriously, have yourself a pleasant evening as well. NFTATT Fox out

[@CuriousBeingbyTina]

@@vulpesvulpes5177 You are indeed a "clever fellow!"

[@DerekFrazier2014]

Your test make complete since. Another stupendous job.

[@CuriousBeingbyTina]

Thanks a lot Derek! Much appreciated :-)

[@StigTP]

Denisovan found in Denisova Cave is not far from the Gornaya Shoria megaliths. Does this have a connection?

[@CuriousBeingbyTina]

That's an interesting thought.

[@davidperkins2103]

Don't know about these structures but I love that tee shirt you are wearing. Great video . As always thanks.

[@ricksanchez3176]

You have some very valid points, and there are many cases of natural being claimed man made. And the other way too. Not too troll, I'm not a geologist either, simply to discuss. Sincerely neither of the two criteria exclude man made, individually, or combined. As for purpose. Of the "seven wonders of the ancient world", massive constructions, yet only one had a known function other than ceremonial or power projection. Add to that changing geology, topography, climate, sea levels, and fresh water drainage. Plus the rise and fall of area populations locally due to the aforementioned, and all the social reasons. There are canal projects, harbors, fortresses, walls we can grasp the purpose for, but we do not understand many, if not most. As for the durability, the continuous joints, that's a great point, and it does near exclude some. The problem is that if something is standing after eons, whether the hand of God or the hand of man put it there, it was constructed with durability. Montana is a vast state, bigger than many countries. You have many pictures of the Sage "wall" located in Montana labeled as the "Montana Magaliths", (Giant's playground). They are two very distinctive sites. The Sage wall I'd lean towards artificial, while MM I'd lean towards natural, with possibly a bit of human tweaking. As for not being a geologist, those of that profession have identified much of Puma Punku as Andecite, yet it contains biological material when spectrographed. I enjoyed the video as always. Thank you.

[@andrewbarlow8937]

Hello Tina . Great job. I enjoy you videos. Keep up the good work. ❤

[@CuriousBeingbyTina]

Thank you! I appreciate your support :-)

[@velaknap]

You are so logical, pragmatic and scientific in your analysis. Your channel is always usefully informative.

[@cwest394]

Plenty in the northeast. Giant stone rooms that have been buried by trees and dirt. They called them root cellers. Giant mounds everywhere. Snake mound. May not be stone but seriously impressive. Most megalithic sites were destroyed by early settlers to make houses and fence rows. Astronomical tower. Somewhere in north east America. Giant rock 60 ft square sitting in the middle of the Maine woods. No one can explain how it got there. Problem with America is that is much much older than people realize. The Appalachian mountains used to be taller than the Himalayas.

[@chrisfleming701]

If early settlers could move the stones then they probably weren’t megaliths. Unless you think they had the same capabilities?

[@bialy100k]

Clever pronged criteria, I love approach :)

[@CuriousBeingbyTina]

Thank you :-)

[@finnmccool4943]

Great video!

[@pebbleoverpond]

Do we see these formations coming in various geological timescale, or are they specific to a certain time period

[@charlieparker6813]

Very educational, thanks for you input on this very complicated issue, great video.

[@CuriousBeingbyTina]

Glad you enjoyed it :-) Thank you for watching.

[@scotthcomyns3426]

I've built a few stone walls in my time,your comparison of structural integrity looks rock solid to me.

[@CuriousBeingbyTina]

Thank you!

[@lostvisitor]

finely some intelligent non drug induced information. Keep up the great work.

[@CuriousBeingbyTina]

Thank you - hope you will enjoy my other videos too.

[@A_Bone1972]

hello my beautiful friend Tina. each new post of your work, especially your methods, give a feeling of being more & more refined. on subjects such as this, sometimes i like to think about the expression to think outside the box. i've always questioned why does there have to be a box. using this perspective reminds me of the human nature of describing something unknown to us by using comparisons of resemblance to things known. combine to this mindset to consider the source that claims a fact. what i'm getting at is that without knowing if these formations share a continuity of which direction magnetic north among the frequencies of each rock, or some other verifiable method supporting a naturally occurring process, how would we know that the structure we now see that we're being told are of rocks that are millions of years old aren't the remnants of a megalithic structure after enduring all of the erosion, chataclysmic events, and planetary changes both known & unknown that have occurred in such a time span? the more what once were stated facts from mainstream academia are proven not to be true the more i question the validity of what remaining facts put forth by mainstream academia are based to be proven from. somewhat akin to is the concept of gravity a proven fact, or a misunderstanding of our relationship to how we feel the force of Earth as it spins at a wobble while orbiting the sun as well as being part of a solar system that is constantly moving in a spiral through the vacuum of space? one might even ask did this comment become a rant, or did it inspire food for thought? much 💗 ✌️🐝➕

[@norrinradd8952]

Amazing commentary on this subject. This is the best video I have watched regarding this location, hands down. I have a simple test myself for a structure like this. It is a rock. If there is no other evidence, then it can be nothing more than a rock. The only evidence that exists for this being a man-made structure is that it does indeed appear to look like a wall. At least portions of it. But, that's where the evidence ends. There are many videos surrounding the idea that this is a man-made structure, but they completely avoid the evidence that it is indeed a naturally formed structure. Not only do they ignore the idea that perhaps it is just a rock, they disregard many of the points you made in this video. Your test covers what I think is one of the most important criteria of answering the question of, why? You hit the nail on the head with, what is the purpose? That question leads us down the path of additional questions. What evidence exists of its function, the builders, how it was built and when? Without any evidence to satisfy any of these questions, we are left with only one piece of evidence again. It is just a rock. It never occurred to me to consider intentional structural integrity, or as you pointed out, the lack thereof. I believe this is a logical, intelligent follow up to the first part of your test. Absolutely brilliant. Again, well done.

[@CuriousBeingbyTina]

Thank you very much for the support. I really appreciate it :-)

[@someoneoutthere1866]

Great analysis 😊

[@CuriousBeingbyTina]

Thanks!

[@PatriotPaul759]

Thanks for your video.

[@donnysandley4649]

Great video Tina 💯

[@CuriousBeingbyTina]

Thank you 😁

[@ashleytilling3257]

Tina, please look into the stone wall structures in Texas and also africa. They are from more recent civilizations but may be explained by geologic origins.

[@ideagora37]

Very informative and convincing Tina. Thanks for getting it out so quickly after your last one. Your architectural and engineering education shows. It's nice to see a well researched and balanced video on the subject of ancient megaliths in an age where only sensationalism seems to sell. There are plenty of ancient megalithic monuments in the world, but as you definitively make the point, not all are man made. Will you do one on Puma Punku someday? I'd love to get your analysis on it and maybe make some architectural sense of it. Maybe even an analysis of the possible cause of its destruction. You're doing great work. I hope more people support you on Patreon! Ken S.

[@montanamegaliths4842]

Megalithic sites all over the world were constructed over gold and precious mineral sites. Many at the headwaters of major river systems and on earth energy grid lines. The Montana Megaliths fits all of this criteria. Satellite deep geoscans have veriifed the authenticity of these ancient structures. kzbin.info/door/dFeIhHZdjebI7WPgN-guhQ?app=desktop

[@Mr.McCarthyism]

Shiprock wall in new Mexico is polygonal. that wall i believe is miles long with some areas 3 plus stories high.

[@andrewruiz7894]

That looks like a giant wall of ice pummeled a megalithic structure. Imagine

[@walterblanc9708]

I do not see how anyone can see those Montana Megaliths as man made. Thankyou for another very interesting Video.

[@dickburns2403]

no cheese in this video. or any of your videos for that matter. Just lucid, complete, thorough and unbiased analysis of the facts. another great piece of work. The fact that you have less than 22K subscribers makes my head explode. If I win the 1.55 billion dollar lottery tonight in the USA, I will send you to Montana to investigate this in person. Don't get too excited though. You have a 1 in 300,00,000 chance of getting a free trip to Montana...

[@CuriousBeingbyTina]

Thank you - much appreciated! :-) My channel has been shadow-banned for over a year now, as many subscribers left me comments that they no longer receive notifications for my new videos.

[@Za7a7aZ]

What I think..?..I think you are correct. Thx for clearing this dispute up

[@CuriousBeingbyTina]

Thank you for the support :-)

[@Ashphinchtersayswhat]

My kids live clos to Sage wall. Thunderbolt mountain etc. singing rocks etc.

[@retardoentropy4901]

I agree Tina. My conclusion on the Shoria and Montana rock formations, as well as others, were that they appear remnant quirks of nature, that are left after the elements crack, carve, erode, break and disassemble larger rocks over lengthy geological time periods. These can give the appearance of a "wall" where the forces of nature work on predominantly two sides, say as on a ridge crest. The "wall" in all cases is only relatively short, being the length of the exposed rock on the ridge, and is isolated serving no useful purpose. If built by an architect for durability, you would fire him. There is always a build up of scree material, as in a mesa, below these structures normally.

[@CuriousBeingbyTina]

Thank you for sharing with me :-)

[@mcjok88]

Natural break rocks will clearly appear homogeneous. Mineral Veins, inclusions and adjacent material across a break will be apparent. Quarried blocks are obviously from different areas of the quarry in appearance. Igneous stone is obvious to see this effect. From a stone fabricator, I must match similar stone all the time.

[@jamesn.economou9922]

Never once, did you recognize that this place built on a geo-magnetic hot spot. Could these structures, have been collectors, and amplifiers of such power? I believe this is the case. I believe it, because all the ancient Mesopotamian, Indian, and Egyptian texts, tell us, that granite stone blocks, where used to transfer energy. We modern people, just can't believe, the ancients could do, what we cannot. It's sad really.

[@peterjol]

very good explanation for why they are not likely to be man made.

[@Eye_Exist]

I don't like the rhetorical trick you use to make the Montana megaliths to look natural; to show many different kinds of rock formations which lack the most important feature of the montana megaliths (which also is the answer to your #1 criteria, despite of you trying to slip past this ) - that it is distinctly wall shaped - and then conclude that _as the nature is able to form many kinds of structures that appears man made, therefore the montana megaliths must be natural as well._ to make such conclusion one must prove that the nature can create man made-looking walls. you ignore this major feature the entirety of the video, attacking only the minor details mostly with strawman arguments to avoid any direct confrontation with the actual features of the site. for someone who has made some alternative theorist videos in the past, you work shockingly like the mainstream archaeology. let me continue: you also keep referring to the Gornaya Shuria-site (so much that it makes it hard to follow which site we are watching and talking at the moment), which again is completely different site and looks different and not as organized as the montana megaliths, to prove that the montana megaliths must be natural. this is nothing but a strawman argument. instead of dealing with the site in question, you keep attacking against a site in weaker charictaure to prove your point. also at your #1 criteria you consider that they are at hard to access distant locations with no ROADS leading to them - like what the hell is that even? why should there be roads leading to a site abandoned possibly tens of thousands of years ago? and distant from where? from our civilization? what significance does that make to you? on your #2 criteria you claim that man made structures shouldn't have long continuous vertical joints after literally showing a common modern stack bond building style, which you also give a logical explanation of being visually appealing. yes, stacking same many identical sized and shaped blocks without mortar isn't a very sturdy construction, but as we can see in the montana megalith itself, a long vertical joint doesn't make the structure inherently weak, as the structure is still standing to this date, and that the blocks are all different is size. you are also ignoring the V-shape of the joint-stones, and the fact that the joint is in downhill position, which both affect greatly to the pattern in which the weight load is actually distributed to its surroundings. seemingly clever two criteria, if you just didn't misuse them so much. finally there's a major explaining reason why the megalithic sites are (nearly) absent from north america: most ice age maps i've seen depicts the majority of the ice cap of the last ice age over north america - an ice cap which was up to two miles thick. it's no wonder we don't find many believable megaliths from the NA, because such ice sheet would have destroyed any pre-existing man made construction - megaliths included - on its way. the same applies to scandinavia. this also explains why this site is so heavily eroded, because if it actually is man made site, it has likely been overrun by two miles of ice for thousands of years. PS. I wouldn't take the mainstream geology as a very trustworthy authority when it comes to judging whether some rock formation is natural or man made. just the dating of the great sphinx alone shows how eagerly the vast majority of geologists are simply to look away from the site, which those few independent geologists who look the site come to the uniform conclusion that the sphinx's erosion is water based and couldn't possibly be as young as the mainstream egyptology wants us to believe. many of the images you showed that the mainstream geology considers natural show way too much recurring pattern to be considered natural without extremely sophisticated explanation and demonstration. they have high motive to lie and to ignore evidence that suggests the alternative, and no question they most often do so, as majority of the academics are simply afraid to state anything that contradicts the official narrative.

[@belavarplaniie8933]

Great analysis of the video, I agree with your points.

[@jimhackman5184]

Thank you, always brilliant.

[@CuriousBeingbyTina]

Thank you!

[@mikeC8756]

Great analysis and great t-shirt Tina!

[@mikeC8756]

How about the Gosford Glyphs? I think we all need your analysis on those soon! Ancient Egyptian or not?

[@CuriousBeingbyTina]

I'll do some digging :-) Thank you Michael!

[@mikeC8756]

Thanks Tina, you made my day!

[@Archaeonauts]

Thanks for the analysis on this! I saw the Montana megaliths recently but hadn't really looked into them. But I looked into Gornaya Shoria some time a while back and basically came to the same conclusions you did about it. It looks manmade in certain spots from certain angles, but if you zoom out and look at more of it, it doesn't really look manmade, and doesn't seem to serve a purpose. It looks like that's probably the same kind of thing we are seeing with the Montana megaliths.

[@CuriousBeingbyTina]

Thank you for sharing with me :-)

[@Li_Ao]

Clear logic and correlated to your previous videos.

[@CuriousBeingbyTina]

Thank you! :-)

[@11regnartseht]

Bright insight recently made a video on this site. I felt like the way him and his guest represented things was at best wishful thinking, but it also seemed a bit disingenuous. Like all the photos they showed seemed heavily cherry picked to give a certain impression... So I had to watch this video again to gain some perspective, because honestly, you are very good at open minded research, presentation, all of it. I appreciate your opinions, observations, and you're intelligent and detail oriented nature. Thanks for keeping it real.

[@CuriousBeingbyTina]

Thank you! So glad that you enjoy my videos :-)

[@gamehavenstl9485]

I've often wondered the same: "Why are there no megalithic structures in North America?" I definitely like your explanation & think it's very plausible/likely. There's also Manifest Destiny, the gov didn't want any natives to be able to claim the property was theirs & destroyed anything they found that was made by previous populations, used it as materials to build something else or claimed it for their own. The original head of the Smithsonian was John Wesley Powell, who was a proponent of Manifest Destiny. He specifically didn't want any finds pre Columbus. It's argued that the world's fair was the remnants of an ancient advanced city & should not have been able to have been built in just 2 years with 200,000 people in a time without cars, power tools or electricity. That the fires that were started, were to cover up the lie. If you look at the structures that were apparently jute & plaster, it just doesn't make sense. There is a news article from The Raftsman's Journal, Antiquities In America Jan, 6th, 1858 By S.B. Row They talk about how America is covered with structures that would rival that of Thebes or Nineveh. How in New York there are 100 statues carved out of stone of all different animals. With a skill that far exceeded that of any of the Indians. In Missouri there was a tower over 100' high & 80' wide at the base, with a redoubt & citadel attached at it's base with architecture matching that of Europe. With forests covering it, putting it over 1600 years old. chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn85054616/1858-01-06/ed-1/seq-1/ The Unexpected Cosmology does a good cover of it on You Tube The 1893 Chicago World Fair Was a Hoax | Millennial Kingdom + Mud Flood

[@lindalongenecker5769]

Tina conspicuously omits analysis of the immense, unnatural TIZER dolmen...

[@anasevi9456]

Thank you for your wonderful overview on the matter as always. Always glad to see an educator looking to take a class through a journey of likelihood, rather than a narrative.

[@novacadian4745]

Would Machu Picchu pass your test #1? Your comparisons of natural to constructed, with attention to stacking styles, helped give me a better understanding of the subject. Thanks!

[@anthonystark6372]

Hi Tina. Nice video. Have you ever researched the hexagonal pathways of The Giant's Causeway in Northern Ireland? When I was a school boy back in the 80's I visited a friend who lived close to the site. We walked along the paths and it was amazing to see these hexagonal formations. Legend tells that it was the Irish giant Finn MacCool who built the pathway to travel to Scotland to fight his Scottish giant foe. Not sure about that bit though. LOL Still, it is certainly something to see. Keep up the good work. Chris. x

[@BionAvastar3000]

Your hair looks amazing!

[@cloudydaycauldron]

It’s easy to believe something is beyond natural when it simply is what it is. Great starting point. As far as function these could have been adapted for human use, like any cave or other natural structure.

[@Slavigrad]

Hi Tina, as always great analysis! Great topic 🙂

[@CuriousBeingbyTina]

Thank you so much🙂

[@chadkline4268]

Also, glacial activities. And seismic activities during the epochs of sedimentation or volcanic layering. If something is man made, there always needs to be a quarry not far away. That seems to be a proof of whether man made or not.

[@permabroeelco8155]

I like your clear cut structural approach❤. But if those people want to believe in alternative ‘facts’, it will take some time and effort to convince them, if possible at all. It is a market, and enough people without a clue, so the prophets can make their profits.

[@CuriousBeingbyTina]

Very true. Thank you for the support - I appreciate it.

[@reesebroekhoven3962]

Awe that was such a great attempt at saying Saskatchewan with you accent. I'm Canadian and its a extremely tough one to say so great job at a great attempt!

[@awalk56]

Great video, well done.

[@CuriousBeingbyTina]

Thanks for the visit.

[@robertminor9297]

Another brilliant analysis, truly insightful, logical and very persuasive.

[@CuriousBeingbyTina]

Thank you very much for the support :-)

[@joelmosier125]

FACT: The entire Planet is Eden. Erde, Erden, Eden German for dirt/Earth. Dust, Dirt, Stone is a Negative charge. All Terrans understand this and are taught in school I am J.Terran the only Terran to be born on Eden/Earth. Thank you for sharing your video.

[@darrylbaber6329]

The purpose of the walls In Montana has puzzled me from the first time I heard of them. A couple of years ago. Or less. Of coarse we have no way to tell what was going on at that time. However building a giant stone structure would not have been done without a good reason. Good morning Tina

[@drhexagonapus]

Have you seen the knobs photographed at the montana megalithic site? I agree most of it looks natural but those knobs make me think there may be some artificial influence. Same for gornaya shoriya, most of it looks quite natural but a few pictures seem to show those protrusions common at other megalithic sites. I wish I could go to these places and see them in person, it is so hard to make such a call purely from photographs.

[@DuckDodgers69]

I appreciate the information

[@cosmoray9750]

👍Excellent analysis.

[@CuriousBeingbyTina]

Thank you kindly!

[@JohnDelong-qm9iv]

80000 dolmens worldwide are shrines to Noah’s ark. They were the first cathedrals. They were shaped when the flood sediment was still soft. They have embossed features wich symbolize the flood waters and the rainbow.

[@murrayclaus3595]

Our ancestors fought giants too. It's in our stories to this day happened longago

[@Keopp69]

7:28 It is Devil's Lake WISCONSIN in Sauk county. The Indians called it 'Spirit Lake' and was interpreted as bad, or devil by the white explorers.

[@sake343]

Rockwall Texas has an interesting history and may have a buried town/fort etc. I am on the fence on it, but some pictures are very interesting and looks man-made, but others look more natural.