@@CuriousBeingbyTina You are doing a WONDERFUL JOB! NEVER STOP.
@eveb.6568Ай бұрын
agree 100%. mine too.
@willsteele92492 ай бұрын
First and foremost, you know they're not going to like this theory, and it is actually my favorite. This theory also explains why the early archeologist fell ill and died believing the pyramids were cursed, no you're searching around in chemical waste. Tina you never cease to amaze me. thank you so much, your intellect is highly appreciated and need it. Continue to show us the way.
@CuriousBeingbyTina2 ай бұрын
Thank you! I deeply appreciate the support ♥
@JohnGilbert-i7kАй бұрын
The only thing missing is what was removed from those mountains before they were glued back together and stacked up. Limestone and sandstone contain quartz, which if you crush it up into fine powder you can remove trace amounts of gold and other metals and use the waste products to reconstitute it back into blocks. I have been studying evidence of this same prehistoric process in the Eastern US Mountains and I have identified 134 sites of what is being called 'The Platinum Culture' and the metallic blends and percentages of pgms and iron are incredible not to mention the artwork has aspects of Paleolithic styles.
@Hallands.3 ай бұрын
This could be it! Makes more sense than all the traditional mumbo-jumbo.
@watcher13th2 ай бұрын
Almost anything makes more sense than stones and copper chisels...
@Hallands.2 ай бұрын
@@watcher13th True!
@Hroupe2 ай бұрын
I really, really like this idea! Maybe next look into the geology of the Nile where, the stretch where all the pyramids are found and see if there is a commonality in the minable ores at those sites
@CuriousBeingbyTina2 ай бұрын
Thank you! I tried to find such information a few years ago, though most studies are limited to Giza. I'll search again to see if any new info popped out :-)
@travisgoldson18143 ай бұрын
I think you got this right ! It just makes the most sense!!!
@CuriousBeingbyTina2 ай бұрын
Thank you for the support 😊
@lesbendo63632 ай бұрын
Again Tina, you are outside of the box looking in. Your hypothesis is sound. Some accounts state that there may be high water marks on the pyramids. Could this be a pre Young dryas structure? 🇨🇦
@eveb.6568Ай бұрын
very much agree
@faroukamad43733 ай бұрын
Hey Tina. Subscriber and huge fan of yours. Your mining theory is spot on. I'm especially interested in the machine tool marks in most megalithic sites around the world that may be linked to an previously unknown advanced civilization that used tools beyond our comprehension, that has eroded away over the millennia...
@CuriousBeingbyTina2 ай бұрын
So glad - thank you very much for the support ☺
@LadyBGoode-gr8wm2 ай бұрын
There is another youtuber named Paul Cook (same name as his channel). He has a theory that this "stonework" was poured like cement. The texture is meant to be a surface that stucco (or "render" as it is called in the UK) is meant to adhere to. This looks like a poured geopolymer where the mold technique is visible. The rough marks were meant to take a layer of stucco. Either it was not finished, or the stucco fell off. I need to finish Tina's video, though. I have barely started watching.
@denisdesormeaux40932 ай бұрын
i apreciate the comprehensive way of your expose .you are brilliant .it could very well be like you are suggesting
@Roberto-gb9il2 ай бұрын
You put together such great theories and explain them with actual research to back your claims and you do so eloquently. Thank you for your most awesome presentations Tina! Great job
@CuriousBeingbyTina2 ай бұрын
Thank you! I really appreciate the recognition and support!
@philipgoldenstein82472 ай бұрын
I like this idea. Keep up the great work!
@ElectricalExistence2 ай бұрын
its amusing that the pyramids could be just an elaborate mine dump. but its highly unlikely that was its intended purpose.
@CuriousBeingbyTina2 ай бұрын
Thanks! Will do!
@leandereldredge71392 ай бұрын
Excellent thoughts and clearly explained
@CuriousBeingbyTina2 ай бұрын
Thank you 🙂
@jeffjeff44772 ай бұрын
Awesome segment as always Tina! The pyramids are so perplexing on so many levels. If a time machine was possible, Id go here and the Chinese mining caves. Love that T Shirt!!!! Going to look for one there next weekend 😊 Love your videos Thank you !!!
@CuriousBeingbyTina2 ай бұрын
Thank you Jeff! Much appreciated 😊 Hope you are well, and the sunny state is recovering from the hurricane.
@christopher3d4753 ай бұрын
I was just at a town in western Montana called Butte, that has a gigantic tailing pond. It's super toxic water.
@jessealan88552 ай бұрын
Smart and beautiful !
@jimhackman51843 ай бұрын
Thanks again. Brilliant as usual.
@CuriousBeingbyTina2 ай бұрын
😊 I appreciate your support.
@Li_Ao2 ай бұрын
The Pyramid of Giza still remains the oldest of the Seven Wonders of the Ancient World. True advanced technology.
@CuriousBeingbyTina2 ай бұрын
Yep :-)
@dansaber58533 ай бұрын
What a coincidence I was just thinking on this subject. The pyramids are far older than the academics say.
@mskathychapman2 ай бұрын
Great video. i like your theory.
@CuriousBeingbyTina2 ай бұрын
Thanks!
@JackieKraft3 ай бұрын
The granite used however was not a locally sourced waste material, That was actually quarried hundreds of miles away for a specific purpose during construction… It does have the look of utilitarian design however and will agree on that point.
@gregoryhousch33212 ай бұрын
Her theory is that the casing is intended to protect the limestone from erosion , I think.
@JackieKraft2 ай бұрын
I get that and would actually agree, But the granite slabs used in construction are beyond a simple waste pile, That was intended to be something very specialized and specific.
@Chuck85412 ай бұрын
Exactly. Her theory is based on ‘they’re near shafts in the ground, and the pyramids look like mounds near modern mines’? It addresses nothing of significance. Why would the alleged ‘star shafts’ (for lack of a better name) be for interior drainage, if they were sealed off? Purpose of the kings chamber - and its elaborate entrance? The relieving chambers? The relieving chambers were solely there to redirect weight AWAY from the kings chamber. Why have it, if it’s just tailings storage? Purpose of grand gallery if its just tailings storage? Purpose of the new even larger gallery that was found with cosmic muography? If you’re storing stuff, why have massive cavities in the structure you’re building? Why the elaborate chevron main entrance? Why are some pyramids built directly on top of the tunnels? If you’re mining, would you store waste directly above you? lol It’s a nice new and novel idea - that someone else put forward years ago, but it makes no sense to me. This theory conveniently doesn’t touch on these questions at all. She stated in the beginning that a plausible theory needs to touch on all these things, but then her theory touches none of them.
@MJIZZEL2 ай бұрын
@@gregoryhousch3321the granite mentioned above is in the interior in the kings chamber. What your talking about is the Turah limestone casing on the exterior.
@MJIZZEL2 ай бұрын
Also the sand recovered from the exploratory drilling in the queens chamber passage was sourced from modern day Saudi Arabia. Most likely for is more rounded grains which allow for less friction.
@nat7x7Ай бұрын
Fascinating, as always. I really appreciate you sharing your findings and your theories Tina. Lots of food for thought and I def think you are onto something big here. I would be interested to hear your thoughts on Khara Hora mountain cave findings. I was watching a video on it earlier today, there are remarkable similarities to the insides of the pyramids. It looks to me the inside of the mountain was used as a giant mining waste disposal site. And super interesting that the inside of the deep cave has a constant flow of fresh air. As if by design :) It is not clear whether there are any shafts found in the area... if the mountain itself was mined or only used for waste disposal for something excavated further away. In any case it is very possible this was the work of the same civilisation that built the pyramids.
@CuriousBeingbyTinaАй бұрын
Thank you - I appreciate your support :-) Based on what I've seen on the Khara Hora mountain cave, I think it is likely natural. The shafts might be seams between some gigantic fault formation. Some videos on Khara Hora also showed Gornaya Shoria megaliths - I wonder if these two are in the same mountain region. (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gornaya_Shoria_megaliths). I made a video on Montana megaliths and Gornaya Shoria megaliths explaining my opinions on them - My Two-Pronged Test on Montana Megaliths: Man-Made or Natural? kzbin.info/www/bejne/nZXVn5uOhrygbLs Hope you will find it helpful.
@ryanvalley18933 ай бұрын
Alot of old cities are actually ancient mining sites like Paris, Malta, Athens.
@CuriousBeingbyTina2 ай бұрын
Good call - thank you for sharing!
@foxone2652 ай бұрын
I really like this theory. Well done.
@CuriousBeingbyTina2 ай бұрын
Thank you 😊
@CuriousBeingbyTina2 ай бұрын
Thank you :-)
@foxone2652 ай бұрын
@@CuriousBeingbyTina your welcome 😊
@Chuck85412 ай бұрын
Let’s say you’re right, and it’s just tailing storage: What about all the granite inside? How could the interior shafts be drainage, if they were blocked off? What about the relieving chamber? What about the elaborate door/entry way into the kings chamber? The elaborate entryway/main entrance to the pyramids? If it’s just tailing storage, what’s the purpose of the massive grand gallery? Or the newer even larger gallery found with cosmic muography that’s alleged to be the size of a 747? Why are some of the pyramids directly above all these tunnels? Surely you wouldn’t store waste directly above where you’re working? Your theory needs to address these things, not merely because the shape is nice, and they’re near shafts in the ground.
@CuriousBeingbyTina2 ай бұрын
Hope you will find the following videos helpful: - The True Purpose of the Great Pyramid's Interior System?! kzbin.info/www/bejne/eIrVZ3uYes-Gbdk - The Secret Enigma of the Egyptian Pyramids’ Interior kzbin.info/www/bejne/nqm6doqLqNuWiZY - Egyptian Pyramids Reveal Acid Mine Drainage Stains? kzbin.info/www/bejne/Y4Lcen1jrJJrrMU The gable ceilings and relieving chamber with granite slabs are likely structural.
@ReadersOfTheApocalypse2 ай бұрын
Modern landfills have a lot of monitoring and control facilities on site. Therefore it would absolutely make sense to have all kinds of shafts and rooms for drainage, sensors, pumps and various machinery in different parts of the the pyramid. All with different demands on the surrounding structure and material. Depending on the required level of maintenance, access for personnel could also be very limited or even permanently sealed after the initial phase is completed. The layout/complexity of this internal structure also depends on a lot of factors like type of waste, environmental conditions and advances in knowledge. Today's engineers are still developing proper ways to handle long term toxic/radioactive waste. Some concepts go towards establishing a myth based priestly order of guardians, that shall try to prevent unintended intrusions into the depots for several millennia. They are even researching types of sign language to convey the danger - and that might outlast several restarts of human civilization. So the idea that the pyramids are waste heaps is not far fetched at all. I'd say it's currently the most plausible explanation I came across. Would be nice to know how the situation (ores, mining shafts etc.) looks like on the the other great pyramid/mound sites around the globe.
@Chuck85412 ай бұрын
@@ReadersOfTheApocalypse Yes, of course there's monitoring equipment needed in actual mining. But it feels just like wishful thinking, there's no evidence for anything. It's just an idea. But the theory still doesn't answer most of those other questions. Such as the 'star shafts' being blocked off. Anyways, I'm not right, you're not right, she's not right - we're all just guessing. With no proof of anything. Until the Egyptian government drastically changes, and allows unfettered science to take place, we'll probably never know.
@CuriousBeingbyTina2 ай бұрын
@@ReadersOfTheApocalypse Well said - thank you very much for your insights.
@aynrandish91062 ай бұрын
This is a fascinating idea of how the pyramids came to be. It explains a lot. The one thing I didn’t catch is what the evidence is that the Giza plateau was razed and flattened. How do we know that happened?
@A_Bone19722 ай бұрын
Tina my beautiful friend, thank you for sharing another of your results of your hard work & your ethics. i truly appreciate how you apply your detail minded quality to both your content & your levels of production. i always am fascinated by experiencing moments of synchronicity. even better to me is being able to share such an occurrence. i had stumbled upon a podcast in which the host & his guest began their conversation discussing the possibility of Sacsayhuaman having been created by a now lost knowledge of how to soften or liquify stone as well as using molds for the stone to cool or harden into desired shapes at the point of placement. sounds very familiar, doesn't it? the rest of their conversation i also found to be of interest. i will send you the necessary information for you to check out that video. as for my moment of synchronicity, this video was at the top of the algorithm suggestions for me immediately after i finished with the aforementioned podcast! as always, much 💗 ✌️🐝➕
@Faust-Federel2 ай бұрын
Génial merci beaucoup pour cette vidéo qui est du coup une idée bien séduisante celle du waste... :)
@CuriousBeingbyTina2 ай бұрын
Merci pour le soutien :)
@PR1OCEPT2 ай бұрын
Really enjoy your ability to think outside the box. Brilliant mind.
@CuriousBeingbyTina2 ай бұрын
Thank you 😊
@thomasratliff92782 ай бұрын
Ha, outside the box? Like, outside the solar system....lol. Gotta Love Tina
@cathyd743 ай бұрын
Here to hear Tina 💜
@CuriousBeingbyTina2 ай бұрын
Hi Cathy 😊
@starexplorers12022 ай бұрын
Much better Tina! The overall backdrop is very calming. Now all you need to do is smile just a little. The topic is already serious and smiling helps to allow the viewer time to relax. It is 20 minutes of incredible information after all. 😄
@CuriousBeingbyTina2 ай бұрын
Thank you for the suggestions! I appreciate them 😄
@DerekFrazier20142 ай бұрын
Always a joy to hear your theories. Another fantastic job.
@CuriousBeingbyTina2 ай бұрын
Great to see you, Derek. Thank you for the support!
@_metal_militia7732 ай бұрын
i saw a video that suggested early south american construction may have used mine waste , a corrosive sulphur liquid, to shape stone so it fit together tight. similar to the egyptian construction. without hard tools , you would probably need a substance to soften the rock, for easy shaping. great video!
@erickrueger28693 ай бұрын
Great synthesis of leading edge research! You present a very strong case. What if the primary motive was excavation to build a secure under ground city? This type of project is being done today. Your thesis points to a much older construction date. The great pyramid is dated to reign of Khufu (Gr. Cheops) based on a painted cartouche ‘discovered’ in a demolition probe above the king’s chamber by British officer Howard-Vyse. That discovery may be as false as the fake British ‘Piltdown Man’ skull displayed in the British Museum for over forty years. That one was a ‘missing link’ prop created to support Darwinism. Thank you Tina for questioning and probing the official narratives. Your evidence-based alternatives are excellent!
@MJIZZEL2 ай бұрын
What about the C14 dating of mortar inside the pyramids being contemporary to the time of Khufu/Khafre? I'm not a fan of the standard model but several of these test have been paid for by the Edgar Cayce research institute and come up with a time frame of the old kingdom. The biggest smoking gun to an inheritance hypothesis are the 14k BP burials found with precision cut vases. Imo
@newsundesign2 ай бұрын
❤❤ You are so stunning and smart. I love this theory.
@CuriousBeingbyTina2 ай бұрын
Oh thank you!
@terryenglish71322 ай бұрын
Good job as usual. An excellent theory for where they came from and perhaps their main purpose. But the Granite and spaces would indicate other purposes as well.
@Greg0428692 ай бұрын
Not if it's a big waste processing machine. The granite was needed for its chemical resistance to hold a caustic base that slowly neutralized the acidic mining tailings.
@terryenglish71322 ай бұрын
@@Greg042869 That's not how its used. Its not a liner. The multi chambered "load bearing" structure is tuned to resonate, nothing to do w chemistry.
@Greg0428692 ай бұрын
@@terryenglish7132 No loads are "barred" by those slabs, and nothing resonates. (The tunnel was a result of the caustic base coming down, the same as the "well shaft" and the hole in the floor of the KC.) There was a reason they piled up millions of blocks.
@Greg0428692 ай бұрын
@@terryenglish7132 Does the huge amount of salt found in the pyramid have anything to do with chemistry?
@terryenglish71322 ай бұрын
@@Greg042869 Funetic spelling now ! .... Bearing. Not barring. ... Any way , the Granite slabs said to be load bearing are a resonate chamber w the blocks tuned.
@BrickWilbur20202 ай бұрын
Still my favorite Curious Being
@isma3il20053 ай бұрын
I wanna hear more, like why are the waste piles cardinally aligned so well. Or why do they have any interior structures. Interesting hypothesis.
@CuriousBeingbyTina2 ай бұрын
Hope you will find the following interesting: - Great Pyramid: Let's Double Check the Mathematics & Star Alignment Claims kzbin.info/www/bejne/pIHWqHWqorZ-epo - Prehistoric Mining: What was Mined on the Giza Plateau? kzbin.info/www/bejne/r2e2maiAmd93iZI - The True Purpose of the Great Pyramid's Interior System?! kzbin.info/www/bejne/eIrVZ3uYes-Gbdk - The Secret Enigma of the Egyptian Pyramids’ Interior kzbin.info/www/bejne/nqm6doqLqNuWiZY
@SG-js2qn3 ай бұрын
Here's a question for you: if the technology had advanced so far in the past that the pyramids on Giza are made from mine tailings, shouldn't we find similar structures all over the Earth? It doesn't make sense that a society capable of mining and storing their waste in such a way only did it in Egypt. In line with this, are most sites with what appear to be mine shafts accompanied by pyramid piles, and vice versa? Like in Malta, Petra, and India, we have evidence of what could be ancient mines which were later modified for human use (rock cut tombs, etc.). Shouldn't there be piles of manufactured stone near each? I think your theory is great and could certainly apply to Egypt, but it seems we should find additional evidence around the world. China has shafts and pyramids, but they aren't located next to each other, to the best of my knowledge. Is it possible that some hills near these various shafts are actually piles of manufactured rock? But concealed by overgrowth like the temples in Mexico and Guatemala?
@CoffeeFiend13 ай бұрын
This may get deleted but F it. Whilst we see pyramids all around the world there is a very significant spectrum of pyramids in terms of complexity, architecture and possible function. A lot of them are literally solid. Some are clearly tombs. Some are clearly not tombs. Some really look like they have pragmatic functions. Some have vast internal structures and subterranean networks, some don't. The sizes vary, shapes vary, materials vary. We need to be careful when looking for commonalities across the world because the old naysayer argument of "it's most efficient way to stack blocks" will always permeate all of the structures regardless of what they were and weren't. Honestly the pyramids around the world are so different from one another, them being stacked blocks is about the only thing they have in common most of the time. This in a way does help her theory though (as well as pretty much everyone else) as they're in essence unique to one another.
@SG-js2qn3 ай бұрын
@@CoffeeFiend1 Why would your comment be deleted? Is there something controversial about it?
@CuriousBeingbyTina2 ай бұрын
I think my hypothesis only apply to similar reconstituted stone pyramids with precise fittings and underground deep shaft systems, but not the pyramids made of bricks and rammed earth. The Chinese pyramids are made of rammed earth and designed as royalties' tombs (which I made a video on - Chinese Pyramids: Myth or Reality Revealed! kzbin.info/www/bejne/rZDOg5SqgZp6iqs) One of the Chinese pyramids was turned to a museum -en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yangling_Mausoleum_of_Han Three years ago, someone left me comments mentioning that the Bosnian pyramids might be mining related since they are stone pyramids with underground tunnels. I did a little digging on these pyramids but there is not much detailed information around. On another note, I studied the green and dry Sahara periods to see their influences on the Giza area (Egyptian Pyramids & the Impact of a Green vs Desert Sahara kzbin.info/www/bejne/bnS5lqefpN1jasU), I found that Giza has been pretty dry for the last 78,000 years, which means the water has been limited and precious. If a big mine was operated on the Giza plateau which is close to the main freshwater source Nile, then the mine operators might be regulated to do their best to limit the potential environmental impact, and thus the construction of the pyramids.
@bazdaniels742015 күн бұрын
I think you're definitely on to something... Keep it up like Jimmy Corsetti with his Richaut / City of Atlantis theory ! People will begin to notice !
@CuriousBeingbyTina14 күн бұрын
Thank you for the encouragement! I appreciate it :-)
@michaeloconnor66832 ай бұрын
So the Pharos were buried inside a giant pile of rubble -- that's poetic justice
@petrschejbal32143 ай бұрын
the site deffinitely gives more industral sensation if you ever been there. Definitly not a Holly site. BTW. There was belgian enginer (whos name I did forget) in 70s who made a model of pramid and proved it was a watter pump and pulse generator. If it was buit it as a tumb it is a heck of luck to make a watter pump out of it, dont u think.
@CuriousBeingbyTina2 ай бұрын
Yes I agree. For a hydraulic ram pump to function there needs to be a water tank/water source located higher than the water tunnels. Assuming that the passageways and chambers in the Great Pyramid were indeed made to transport water (even though they are not waterproof), which means the water level of the water source needed to be higher than the pyramid's entry which is about 6-floor high. We don't see such water tanks or water delivery system on the Giza Plateau. Also, what's the point of creating a ram pump with the pyramid? If the goal was to make a water pump then the builders didn't need to piled up millions of stone blocks to create a pyramid shaped structure.
@petrschejbal32142 ай бұрын
@@CuriousBeingbyTina thanks for reply. I appology for my bad description and explanation. I was more pointing to fact that pyramids are reffered as tumbs which Is clearly false as this is highly functional enginering marvelI. I hope I will find the source I have it from for you but you might have seen in already I guess. Demn I am in this rabbit hole again... You are great, keep up the work.
@petrschejbal32142 ай бұрын
@@CuriousBeingbyTina Steven Mayers is the guy
@danieldanton11292 ай бұрын
Does this apply to all pyramids do you think? Or certain ones? Do you think it's only the pyramids on thr Giza plateau that are from a previous advanced civilization,? Thank you for your hard work and insight, it's refreshing!
@CuriousBeingbyTina2 ай бұрын
Thank you! I think this hypothesis applies to the stone pyramids with precise casings, while do not apply to the ones made of mud bricks or rammed earth (the Chinese pyramids). Besides the great pyramids of Giza, it's possible that the Step, the Bent, the Red and smaller stone pyramids at Saqqara, Dahshur and Abusir were made for the same purpose.
@isupportyou99292 ай бұрын
Your hypothesis raise more curious question that where would they use the mine they excuvated ?
@erikistrup34772 ай бұрын
1:30. I just got the thought that machine ground rock materials could be used as part of a concrete production. That could, in the end, be a more convenient way to build structures.
@CuriousBeingbyTina2 ай бұрын
I agree 😊
@Iseeyou-cf6ln2 ай бұрын
Pyramids are built into that shape because its a naturally strong shape with specific benefits, when we make tailings piles it makes a cone because thats natural efficiency, but its not done with the intent of quality, when we build we build for quality and often that matches natures natural shapes, we also don't try to go inside our tailings piles, theres no need for that and its an unnecessary expense. Crystals don't form into pyramid shapes because they are mine remnants, right...The Precision of the pyramids demonstrates a purpose far beyond a tailings pile and is very minimizing to those ancient cultures. Not that you cant consider it but it gives no credit to their spiritual life.The only other thing we put this much effort into building are power plants today. Also we wouldn't turn tailings into concrete blocks for storage, that would be a huge waste and these are not dangerous waste products, they would be used as building materials made into useful shapes, and building them into a skyscraper level structure only to leave them there would be nonsensical waste of effort. Though your theory on reconstituted limestone and the mining actions taken at the site in preparation for it may have merit to me. Also Id suggest you consider the context of these pyramids with respect to all the other pyramids and ancient sites like the sun pyramid in Mexico, they had much more purpose. You're really off on this one, but generally I think you're one of the best but you have to train yourself in spiritual understanding and subtle energy forces to get to the bottom of what they were doing.
@danontherun56853 ай бұрын
I recall the waste materials from Petra are missing. Also that Praveen noted the missing wastes from the rock cut temples. Doesn't mean much because we diggers are pretty dang good at rat holing wastes around the sites. Also I couldn't help but consider the Malta cart track site kinda looks like belly scrapers removed materials. Need to redirect space exploring and war bux to resolving the inexplicable stone puzzles.
@vulpesvulpes51772 ай бұрын
Glad to see you! Your theory is as good as any and better than most. And you have supported it in other videos. One rough spot is the geologic identification of limestone. Igneous risks are hard to fake. Yet we do it with granite countertops. In theory it’s hard to fake limestone. We don’t tend to make synthetic limestone because we either cut it or use concrete in its place. One fact often overlooked is that folks thought “Roman concrete” was actually limestone until the early 1900’s when it became apparent it was a poured and cast product. Yet it has weather much like native rock. A similar process may be at work there as you logically surmise. The point I’d pick with you is the casting of mine waste into blocks for a pyramids. Nothing in the composition of those blocks screams toxic stuff to me r sequestered. Rather there had to be some purpose for the pyramids. Beyond waste storage. More of a kill two birds with one stone thing. But we don’t see the “thing” so the whole idea is dismissed. Clearly those blocks were not cut by little copper tools. And probably not by the dynastic Egyptians. My last thought is that the casing stones may be a key. And except for the tip of the great pyramid they are just gone. Not in a pile at the base. And not as repurposed stone that we see in adjacent towns. And the authorities won’t let anybody touch the few remaining casing stones. No samples no analysis. Just assumptions and a narrative. So rock on Tina, pun intended. You’re outside the bun as they say. Describing what looks more like a taco than a burger. And as to mining. I’ve commented before. Quite a bit of ingestion in that limestone on the Giza. Iron too. Yet the few chemical analysis of the pyramid blocks show low ingestion and iron. As you’d expect for spent ore in a mining operation. And iron makes steel. And tungsten makes tungsten carbide, almost as hard as industrial diamonds and our go-to for our best industrial tools. But where are these steel tools you ask. Iron rusts. And iron holds the tiny bits of TC that form cutting points. Archeologically, bronze and copper weather the ravages of time better than iron. Or steel. Iron and steel swords from Saxon burial sites are wasted relics. While bronze swords from Chinese tombs twice as old are intact and pristine. It’s just the metallurgy. We almost lost a WW2 destroyer/museum recently due to steel plate wastage under the water line. After 60 years. Imagine some steel machine 5000 years old. It’s a pile of rust and a few TC chips blowing in the sand. If it was not recycled into something else. As iron and steel often is. Well good work. I’m with you on Patreon. More should be too. Fox out PS. I hate my AI 🤖 spell checker. I can’t turn it off and so risks are rocks. And ingestion is tungsten and so forth.
@CuriousBeingbyTina2 ай бұрын
Great to see you Fox! Hope all is well. Thank you for sharing your insights. Much appreciated! I was wondering what "ingestion" meant by you until I saw the P.S. :-) Mine wastes might not always contain toxic elements like cyanide, while they could have traces of heavy metals like iron (which have been detected from the two big great pyramids' core stones). Heavy metals in such waste would result in acid mine drainage which is considered toxic to humans, animals and plants. Yes, it's hard to get new information, since the Egyptian authorities are limiting investigating methods. Btw the 2020 paper with material analysis didn't show tungsten. I've been searching for studies presenting tungsten in pyramid blocks but so far no luck...
@vulpesvulpes51772 ай бұрын
@@CuriousBeingbyTina Calcium tungstate is present in limestone in that area. With better mineral sources in China and Africa it’s not considered economically viable. But at one point in WW2 it was and Britain had a small operation to extract it somewhere in Egypt. Needing it for armour piercing shells. It’s typically hard to test for and typically in very low concentration, even in “tungsten rich minerals” like wolframite. So standard geological tests won’t look for it. Geologically it’s a “trace element”. But industrially it’s the real deal, despite its scarcity. And so mining geologists test for it, and molybdenum and all the other “trace elements” used industrially. Your thesis was about mining. So tungsten popped to mind. But I’d bet archaeologists paying for geological analysis did not test for tungsten. But if I was an ancient Egyptian with “advanced technology” I’d want tungsten to cut all that rock. Just makes logical sense. But proving that will be hard. Cost money. 💰
@RobertBarestrand3 ай бұрын
They dig Down 100%. Intelligent woman.
@desckUgah0002 ай бұрын
It was likely for food storage, so was machu pichu. The shafts were for pouring grains in or some so oxygen gets in so food does not spoil.
2 ай бұрын
I still think that they were build for a purpose, whatever that might be, rather than a pile of waste material. But what I just realised is that the blocks are probably poured in situ instead of dragged up there. Something to consider is that the Ark of the Covenant has the same dimensions as the stone box in the Great Pyramid. Edit: On the other hand, the supposed Hall of Records with its huge labyrinths under the plateau could be the source of material. Win-win.
@capq572 ай бұрын
I'm not sure that you're right but I like the way you think.
@CuriousBeingbyTina2 ай бұрын
Thank you :-)
@Gary-l7d2 ай бұрын
I agree with repurposed !
@minedminemind56562 ай бұрын
Rock carved drawing of Mystery of Sakwala Dhakraya. It's possibly a round Temple site in the design like Anka Wat spires.
@dwtaylor9992 ай бұрын
Seems like a plausible theory. I also like the theory that they were gigantic water pumps.
@anthonystark63722 ай бұрын
It is my favorite theory also. Makes sense. How are you Tina? All good?
@CuriousBeingbyTina2 ай бұрын
Thank you 😊 All good, hope you are well too.
@anthonystark63722 ай бұрын
@@CuriousBeingbyTina I can't complain. Life is good. There are a lot of people worse off than me. I will look forward to your next offering. Chris. x
@wasitipico87422 ай бұрын
Only one question what would the mine fore ?????
@CuriousBeingbyTina2 ай бұрын
Here -> Prehistoric Mining: What was Mined on the Giza Plateau? kzbin.info/www/bejne/r2e2maiAmd93iZI
@wasitipico87422 ай бұрын
@@CuriousBeingbyTina okee lets say your on the right track whe have a mine whe have the piramides there can be iron whe only mis the remnents of the iron ore processing plants the melters etc the must have been huge to , and should not whe find some evidence fore machines leftover etc ? I know the cover up a lot , i am a strong believer of a past ore pre civilisation and only the stones remain but maybe whe find out more in times to come
@little_ygg41062 ай бұрын
When I first saw your video I was amazed, finally something that makes some sense. Would luv more updates about your theory!
@art1muz132 ай бұрын
1:53 Have you heard of the theory that Enoch was the designer, constructor, and owner when originally built 300K plus years ago? It is theorised that they were machines for water propagation.
@CuriousBeingbyTina2 ай бұрын
Didn't know the Enoch theory though I've heard of the water pump hypothesis.
@art1muz132 ай бұрын
@@CuriousBeingbyTina look into it, although the powers that be don't make it easy.
@conradsmith24412 ай бұрын
If I'm not mistaken, only the outside layer of lighter colored casing stones are geopolymer. The greater volume of blocks are nutural. look up the work of Jamie Buturff (masar tech)He asserts that the great pyramid could possibility be a machine for harnessing the electricity stored in the ionosphere and storing it in the casing stones of the pyramid(s).
@conradsmith24412 ай бұрын
Your theory has some valid points but doesn't explain many aspects of the design of the pyramids. The small shafts inside them do not appear to be built for drainage. Buturff asserts that they have a much more technical purpose in that they are there to direct acoustic energy, and in the case of the great pyramid, the hydrogen gas produced in the 'Queen's chamber'
@CuriousBeingbyTina2 ай бұрын
There are several studies on the core stones which prove that they are artificial. As for the proposal that the pyramid harnessing and storing electricity, did Jamie Buturff clarify why the electricity is only stored in the casing stones? Then what do the over 2-million-ton core stones do? I examined the Giza power plant theory by Dunn and another electricity-storing hypothesis by Geoff Drumm in two earlier videos. - The Great Pyramid was Not a Power Plant but perhaps Something Totally Unexpected kzbin.info/www/bejne/sKXOiKJunJlsiZo - Pyramids as Chemical Plants? Detailed Examination on Land of Chem’s theory (the electrical part came in the later half) kzbin.info/www/bejne/gp2lgJVre7drgM0 Here are my videos on the interior openings in various large pyramids: - The True Purpose of the Great Pyramid's Interior System?! kzbin.info/www/bejne/eIrVZ3uYes-Gbdk - The Secret Enigma of the Egyptian Pyramids’ Interior kzbin.info/www/bejne/nqm6doqLqNuWiZY - Egyptian Pyramids Reveal Acid Mine Drainage Stains? kzbin.info/www/bejne/Y4Lcen1jrJJrrMU
@minedminemind56562 ай бұрын
You mentioned once in this video the word "electrolysis" in relation to refining iron. If these pyramid structures, doubled as useful electric generators, it would serve this purpose. Ideas don't always have to clash. A civilisation intelligent enough to construct better ways to store mining waste, may have invented a good duplex method
@Radii_DC2 ай бұрын
youre so pretty
@arturlfernandes2 ай бұрын
Yep, and intelligent!
@NecroMancer-w2o2 ай бұрын
I really appreciate your channel and how you debunk various theories-it’s impressive! However, I don’t agree with your idea that the pyramids are mining waste piles, and here’s why: 1- Lack of Evidence: As far as I know, no pyramids in the world are located directly above a mine. It would be relatively straightforward to test the rock at any pyramid site to see if there's anything worth excavating. Just because there are some chemical remnants in the shafts doesn’t necessarily mean they originated from the rocks. They could be the result of other processes or even marks left by machining tools. If your theory is true then why would they mine close to Nile risking its contamination? There should be something very precious then that doesn't exist 100 miles away from Nile. Does that make sense? So what's the unique element that exists under pyramids not 100 miles far away although all this area share almost the same rocks composition. 2- Questionable Waste Design: If the pyramids were merely waste piles, why would there be tons of granite transported over long distances and cut with such precision? That doesn’t add up. 3- Variation in Design: If the pyramid design was intended to handle mining waste, why are there so many different internal structures across pyramids? Take the Great Pyramid and Khafre Pyramid, for instance-they're close to each other but have distinct internal designs. If they were just waste piles, one would expect more consistency. 4- Toxic Material Assumptions: If you’re suggesting that the rocks contain toxic materials and need to be drained in a careful process, which would explain the drainage systems and complex internal structures, what evidence supports that claim? When minerals are extracted from ore, the waste rock often contains heavy metals, sulfur compounds, and other harmful substances. These materials can leach into the surrounding environment, potentially contaminating soil and water. The toxicity depends on the type of mine and the specific minerals involved. If your theory is true then we can find remnant of this toxic material at almost all rocks of the pyramids. And these toxic could also exist in the rock bed where they were digging or where the pyramid drains waste water all the way. I wish to see evidence like "They were digging for X element in the bed rock which is quite common in that area [evidence A], however, since the post process creates toxic element Y then we need to pile waste like that. We found evidence of this toxic in the drainage system [evidence B] and the relationship between X and Y is ..." I’d love to hear your thoughts on these points! - A
@CuriousBeingbyTina2 ай бұрын
Thank you :-) I cited a material analysis showing certain repeating element in the Giza pyramids' core stones in this video - Prehistoric Mining: What was Mined on the Giza Plateau? kzbin.info/www/bejne/r2e2maiAmd93iZI The granite used in the pyramids are very limited and these blocks could be cast as well. We have all types of cast stone today. You might be interested in the following videos: - The True Purpose of the Great Pyramid's Interior System?! kzbin.info/www/bejne/eIrVZ3uYes-Gbdk - The Secret Enigma of the Egyptian Pyramids’ Interior kzbin.info/www/bejne/nqm6doqLqNuWiZY - Egyptian Pyramids Reveal Acid Mine Drainage Stains? kzbin.info/www/bejne/Y4Lcen1jrJJrrMU
@NecroMancer-w2o2 ай бұрын
@CuriousBeingbyTina Thanks for the videos! It seems you're suggesting they were mining for iron because traces were found in the limestone. However, Egypt has regions with much richer iron deposits. You can google the map of Locations of iron mineral deposits in Egypt. Most of these areas are quite far from the Nile and the pyramids’ locations. If they were really focused on extracting iron, we’d expect to see pyramids in different areas, especially considering the Nile’s flooding and its historical branches near the current pyramids. To establish a mine, the most important factor is a rich resource deposit, and the Giza Plateau isn’t abundant in iron, even if small traces are present. Additionally, some pyramids around the world were built on sand, with no bedrock foundation at all, which suggests mining wouldn't have occurred nearby. As for the granite casting theory, I disagree. There's a 1,000-ton unfinished obelisk left at the quarry, which makes little sense if they could just cast it in place and avoid the large shipping bill. Also, there are plenty of quarry marks in Aswan and other sites with identical rock compositions. Even if we assume they casted granite, then where did they get its composition? Why did they use granite at first place? 70 tons a beam is not only for fun! I believe casting might have been used for some casing stones, but likely for specific reasons. For the interior pyramid designs: 1- I still wonder why pyramids have different interior designs while they serve the same purpose? 2- Why small pyramids don't have shafts? 3- Why there are only 2 shaft in the great pyramid covering 2 sides only. As an engineer, I would put shafts in 4 sides and I will put more than one shaft a side for reduce the shear flow especially when it rains bad. 4- Why the northern shaft is not straight forward as the southern shaft. If you look carefully they you can notice weird turns. Why they didn't make them straight forward in mid of the chamber for example? Thanks again! Keep the curiosity up! -A
@hadzhere2 ай бұрын
sounds interesting, i remember asking you a question years ago on your first video...but here are two more for interests sake (i think they're different from last time). why make them so big/heavy? wouldn't it be easier to mold the waste in smaller blocks for ease of movement and storage? why align them with astrological points and the earths' poles? (i've heard both of these factoids about the pyramids, I haven't confirmed them myself of course)
@Crazy-about-cats2 ай бұрын
So if they were mining what do you think they were mining for ? What is underground at that site to make it worthwhile for the people back then to do all that work ? 😇
@CuriousBeingbyTina2 ай бұрын
Hope you like this video - Prehistoric Mining: What was Mined on the Giza Plateau? kzbin.info/www/bejne/r2e2maiAmd93iZI
@Crazy-about-cats2 ай бұрын
I like all your videos !!! 😇 They make me think !!! 😇
@Johnrack2 ай бұрын
Hi Tina. I recall the previous video you made regarding the pyramids on the Giza plateau in which you speculated that those ancient monuments were once a storage area for the overburden from a mining operation. I respectfully disagree, and would like to offer my contrary opinion. 1). Having visited the Giza plateau and being inside the Great Pyramid, let me start by pointing out that the site is immense, and abounds with very many ancient structures besides the Pyramids and the Sphinx. The level of precise construction of the Sphinx temple and other structures, not to mention the Great Pyramid Itself, and the other Pyramids, would not be required if the site’s structures were essentially giant slag heaps. 2). Many structures on the Giza Plateau, like the Great Pyramid, have areas like the King’s Chamber where the granite passage way opening has walls that are square within one half of one degree. As Chris Dunn said, tolerances like those don’t happen by accident. So why go through all the trouble to construct a slag heap with precision fit granite capstones and some chambers within with such precision tolerances? 3). In my opinion the many vertical shafts on the Giza plateau, which are now filled with sand, are ventilation shafts used to supply air to the Great Pyramid, and other structures. I saw an experiment on TV where a smoke stick was dropped in one shaft, and some of it ended up in one of the Great Pyramid’s angled shafts. It could very well be that an undiscovered underground excavation of chambers used for some unknown reason. 4). The so called Osiris shaft complex was apparently build as a tomb, however a horizontal tunnel leads out of the tomb room, but is now flooded with water. So there is an example of ancient peoples digging shafts for either burials or some other as yet unknown purpose. I hope very much that you can visit Egypt someday. It’s a truly awe inspiring trip to a land of mystery.
@krisautumn22243 ай бұрын
Thank you 🙂 Two things was the Nile important to this work? The Nile itself having seasonal variations. Herodotus wrote of a labyrinth underneath the plateau. ? Is this related?
@Mark-wx7vp2 ай бұрын
Tina , Your work always is amazing. I love the way you look at subject matter subjectively to come to a rational well thought out possible conclusion. Very smart lady ! 😁
@CuriousBeingbyTina2 ай бұрын
Thank you! 😊
@Mark-wx7vp2 ай бұрын
@@CuriousBeingbyTina You're welcome Tina 😁
@dantyler69072 ай бұрын
I think a few small fossils have been seen in the pyramid stones. So, mext...
@CuriousBeingbyTina2 ай бұрын
That's very easy to explain. Overburden and waste rocks from the original plateau would have fossils which then cemented to make blocks. Researchers actually pointed out that the mixed directions of the fossils meaning unnatural creation.
@WarAndFame2 ай бұрын
Somewhat similar to the chemical plant theory but much simpler is the great pyramid as a ram pump. I saw a video online where some reconstructed the piping and it worked, and they used waterproof mortar.. it would be cool to see you explore this although I’m sure you’ll debunk it. I still think it’s one of the better theories out there along with your own.
@CuriousBeingbyTina2 ай бұрын
For a hydraulic ram pump to function there needs to be a water tank/water source located higher than the water tunnels. Assuming that the passageways and chambers in the Great Pyramid were indeed made to transport water, which means the water level of the water source needed to be higher than the pyramid's entry. We don't see such water tanks or water delivery system on the Giza Plateau. The base of the Great Pyramid is now 61 m above sea level. Even today transporting water to the plateau top wouldn't be easy. Also, what's the point of creating a ram pump with the pyramid? If the goal was to make a water pump then the builders didn't need to pile up millions of stone blocks to create a pyramid shaped structure. The Great Pyramid is the only one with such interior systems while the other pyramids don't. If the Great Pyramid was a water supplying plant, then what were the other pyramids such as the Khafre? What kind of water supply would need to use million tons of stone?
@KGTiggz2 ай бұрын
What about the once gold cap stone ?
@arturlfernandes2 ай бұрын
I guess there's no evidence for that. But I'm not really sure..
@NiteBoatMusicАй бұрын
Khufu's temple pyramid sarcophagus also served as a sense deprivation chamber for priesthood initiation rituals, a trial if survived would lead to membership among the elites?
@zanenobbs3522 ай бұрын
Hi Tina, great to see you back on here! I agree with your perspective completely and wanted to ask if you think this is the same reason for the pyramids in other places to such as Mexico, Cambodia, China, Sudan, and other locations? Before being repurposed, that is.
@Rufflezhaveridge2 ай бұрын
Very logical
@saschaesken55242 ай бұрын
Biggest refrigerators for Roman icecream
@Cycleplayer1172 ай бұрын
Great theory but what about the astrological similarities?
@68Ronin3 ай бұрын
Your channel deserves 50X the subs!!Thanks for your content!!Not enough people are interested in ancient history...too busy getting their but holes bleached lol!!Again...thanks :)
@CuriousBeingbyTina2 ай бұрын
Thank you! I appreciate the support.
@PlatinumDragonProductions9992 ай бұрын
Very solid hypothesis. Great work!
@CuriousBeingbyTina2 ай бұрын
Glad you think so!
@johnpick83362 ай бұрын
Very interesting theory. Thank you for posting.
@CuriousBeingbyTina2 ай бұрын
My pleasure!
@slave2damachine3 ай бұрын
Very interesting, if the whole purpose of these gigantic çhemical waste disposal systems is environmental responsibility it begs the question what happened to this very civilised society.Thank you Tina .
@CuriousBeingbyTina2 ай бұрын
Thank you for the support. I think the unfortunate ending of this sophisticated society was likely environmentally related. Hope you will find this video interesting: 20,000-15,000 Years Ago, When Humans Faced Extinction - the Ending of a Previous Advanced Civilization? kzbin.info/www/bejne/kKSXq3-Bl9Vnf8U
@slave2damachine2 ай бұрын
@CuriousBeingbyTina Thanks for the link , HS1 and the 3000 year deterial climate change would have brought about human conflict for ever dwindling resources resulting in a tipping point in the population. As the saying goes " there is nothing in the world today that has not existed in the past " .Even today without a HS1 event there are mounting pressures by nations and blocks to secure rare earth minerals to secure future development in advanced technologies. We Tina are living in dangerous times the future is uncertain.
@erniemajor3 ай бұрын
Good for you! Please keep going!
@CuriousBeingbyTina2 ай бұрын
Thank you, I will!
@lightkeeper9172 ай бұрын
What were they mining? Was it iron ore? What were they building with it? Is there building work still in that area and can we find it and display it to the world?
@CuriousBeingbyTina2 ай бұрын
Yes I think iron was mined there - Prehistoric Mining: What was Mined on the Giza Plateau? kzbin.info/www/bejne/r2e2maiAmd93iZI Iron and steel rust fairly fast and would be unrecognizable in thousands of years.
@valkiefalkmann26172 ай бұрын
you are nice, they had help from visitors.....no doubt
@ancientbuilds37642 ай бұрын
The pyramids were just weights. Their job was to tip the water table. The shafts were aquifers. It worked.
@amandaschneider66942 ай бұрын
Very plausable theory. However, what about the Big Black boxea found inside the pyramids wheighting dozens of tons. What woukd be their purpose? Including their Very heavy lids
@neilk.90412 ай бұрын
I think the Great Pyramids are actually a monument. Read the translated Sumerian to understand what was being memorialized. ;) You might be shocked. In any case, it's quite an interesting story. Oddly, there is something about 'mining' in this story as well. From the moment I heard it, it just made sense.
@steelsvanman3 ай бұрын
brilliant as always.... u shud get on joe rogans pod cast and see what he thinks
@313barrygmail3 ай бұрын
Not to be offensive I don’t think she’s real??? Beauty and brains??? I I enjoy her videos, but if it was a fat bald man, I don’t think I would watch them????
@CuriousBeingbyTina2 ай бұрын
Thank you :-)
@midianpoet2 ай бұрын
YES ! Tina , now its time search for machine tool or their remains, maybe in the caves, under water, under sand, even jungle- but on the end , there is old good exploring-in the archive, in the books,legends..using mind. Now in the time when everything seen to be connected with everything, i think You are so close... its the last spark, which ignites fire of knowldege. Good luck with everything, greetings from Czech, stay strong and Curious:)
@rcjoe4062 ай бұрын
If this turns out to be true it would be the biggest tourist trap scam ever
@arturlfernandes2 ай бұрын
You know what? By the time you released the first video I didn't like this possibility. Maybe I would prefer a more "romantic " theory. Well, nowadays this is to me, the sweetest theory of all.
@CuriousBeingbyTina2 ай бұрын
Glad to hear that :-)
@joedegoff14302 ай бұрын
Such a wonderful explanation. You are a brilliant spirit. Thank you for your knowledge.
@CuriousBeingbyTina2 ай бұрын
So nice of you. Thank you - hope you will enjoy my other videos too :-)
@K22channel2 ай бұрын
Yes Tina 💐 keep pushing on this because so far is the best theory. And by stocking so precisely those stones...they might have also aligned those colossal stocks with the above stars to date them👍
@CuriousBeingbyTina2 ай бұрын
Thank you my friend :-)
@passerby91232 ай бұрын
I do like this idea and all of its associated possibilities, but without a corresponding notion of what was being mined, then the mine tailings concept lacks a supporting substance. So, what was mined could be small in volume, compared to rejected materials, as happens with many metals that are valued today, but the minerology of the land and even the culture that grew up around the mine area can be expected to still show some visible sign of the extracted materials. In reality it could be anything, even something that is so common for us today as to have no value, but to be in very short supply in this location thousands of years ago. We know that around the time the pyramids were started, that there was mining of gold, (silver?) copper and tin in other places, as well as the development of bronze, and iron came into its own from around 1200 BC, which might coincide with a reduction of pyramid building, but as far as I am aware, there has been no sign of bronze development around the Giza Plateau in such volumes as would form the tailing pyramids seen today. However, Bronze wasn't just seen as a metal for tools and weapons, it was an alchemical gift from the gods and their metal working priests, and it took a place in the history and psyches of human beings that is belied by our simple stating of the "Bronze Age," as a period of several thousand years that spanned from around 3,300 BC until the start of the iron age. If mining was the activity that caused the pyramids to be formed, as an offshoot to gathering the materials to make bronze, then the dates given for the early pyramids would make some sense, and in any case, all of these dates would become smudged by what starts and remains valued in area. So, is there any history of copper or tin, and then the development of bronze, at Giza?
@CuriousBeingbyTina2 ай бұрын
Thank you. Good to see you. Here are the videos on what might have been mined and the potential functiom of the interiors. - Prehistoric Mining: What was Mined on the Giza Plateau? kzbin.info/www/bejne/r2e2maiAmd93iZI - The True Purpose of the Great Pyramid's Interior System?! kzbin.info/www/bejne/eIrVZ3uYes-Gbdk - The Secret Enigma of the Egyptian Pyramids’ Interior kzbin.info/www/bejne/nqm6doqLqNuWiZY - Egyptian Pyramids Reveal Acid Mine Drainage Stains? kzbin.info/www/bejne/Y4Lcen1jrJJrrMU
@susannah10663 ай бұрын
WOW-It would be funny to think that waste piles were revered so much. I still love the movie; "Land of the Pharaoh's"-1955 🤭
@peteduch21512 ай бұрын
If the pyramid are just a storage for stones why are there so many rough blocks and spaces are filled with sand also where the rooms added later
@CuriousBeingbyTina2 ай бұрын
You are referring to the discovery of the 10-17 inches thick sand layer found outside the Queen's passage wall? I propose that the interior openings are for seepage collection, filtration and treatment purposes. A layer of sand are commonly used for such usage in landfills thus can work similarly in a mine waste storage.
@peteduch21512 ай бұрын
@CuriousBeingbyTina oke thanks for your answer
@terrybrady16442 ай бұрын
True😊
@redwoodcoast2 ай бұрын
When you first proposed the pyramids as mining material sequestration, I thought it was the most ridiculous and unbelievable idea ever. But... now that you have explained the logic behind it, it makes a great deal of sense. In fact, it opens the door to a whole lot of other logical speculation, including: such mining was not done with terrestrial technology, nor was the formation of the building blocks on such a scale, therefore, those autonomous AI machines that did the 'manual labor' were accompanied by some very advanced technology, including the capability to produce levitation and teleportation. Both of those technologies, which have been shown to be technically feasible by some very brilliant scientists, would and could explain the appearance of very heavy granite so high up in the Great Pyramid and so far from the quarry. Also, it has been my crusade for years to point out that not only could 'they' reconstitute limestone but could also reconstitute granite and shape it into any shape for which they could produce a mold, large or small. The granite tailings from the unfinished obelisks and other unknown objects at Aswan were sufficient to form many, many large granite 'sculpted' objects, including columns, obelisks, and statues. I'm looking forward to further speculation and revelation.
@CuriousBeingbyTina2 ай бұрын
Glad to hear that :-) Thank you for the support. I agree with you that granite could be reconstituted as well. We now have all kinds of cast stone including cast granite.
@Irohbro3 ай бұрын
did you watch Apocalypses now by Graham Hancock?
@martinhastingsis2 ай бұрын
Makes a lot of sense. Why not a Four for One, Plateau, Extraction of minerals and Useful Power House that is aligned with the Galactic and Geological Energies. Create a religion around the alignments later. Blessings from New Zealand.
@CuriousBeingbyTina2 ай бұрын
Thank you :-)
@The_Dudester3 ай бұрын
I've said it before and I'll say it again, now. The megalithic sites around the world were built by "the visitors." Why did the visitors do this? Was the Earth a master's degree level architectural class? Was it a competition? Did some of the sites have some unknown to us purpose? Only the visitors know and they have been gone at least 12k years now.
@Pixelpanscher2 ай бұрын
They know it, so they don't have a reason to open the new chambers. Only rubble to find there. And the kings are in their graves in the tale of the kings only. It was easyer to dig instead of building a pyramid.
@rohinbardhan2222 ай бұрын
Hi, This was a very intriguing and well-presented discussion on the Giza pyramids. Moreover, there is also the question o why the great pyramids have very precise astronomical orientations (i.e. their tips lining with the belt of the Orion). Could that be for geolocation purposes assuming the supposed 'advanced civilization' did not have satellite navigation those days? Thanks.