Naive Bayes

[@Justin-zw1hx]

man, you always have the best explanation on all the topics, that's why I subscribed.

[@ritvikmath]

Welcome aboard!

[@meuto80]

I love the way you teach, I am a naive person

[@anandiyer5361]

@ritwikmath, at 7:20, you let w=LIGHT and l=LONG, where does that come from? So, where are we accounting for w=HEAVY and l=SHORT? edit: uhoh...I was so naive! You were calculating the probability for that specific condition...I get it now.

[@anandiyer5361]

BTW, your videos are superb. I make it a point to watch your videos to prepare my notes...Thanks a lot!

[@hameddadgour]

Great video. Thank you for sharing!

[@fyaa23]

Although your other videos are very clear, this is a little bit unstructured - not on your path of explanations, but on your paper. You put many additional notes and signs onto the papers and switch back and forth all the time. For instance, I would recommend sticking to one notation of your probabilities with either commas or intersections.

[@denniswigand1331]

Nicely explained!

[@Donaid]

good explaination for who already heard what bayesian is but don't know exactly

[@aminmohammadigolafshani2015]

perfect