Napoleon vs Khalid Ibn Al-Walid

[@asliddinbafoyev]

Khalid ibn Waleed was the Great fighter, he never lost because Allah supported him

[@QaribArcadia]

Khalid was surely of the best. But khalid fought against 2 greatly weakened empires. The Byzantine-Sasanian War of 602-628 was the final and most devastating of the series of wars fought between the Byzantine Empire and the Sasanian Empire of Iran. This bloody conflict crippled both empires and they didn’t get time to recover as khalid attacked sassanids at 633 and Byzantine syria at 634, battle of yarmouk was in 636. Plus the enemy numbers were exaggerated by arab accounts but its true that khalid was outnumbered most of the time and he was a brilliant tactician

[@QaribArcadia]

@@xmfr7578 Yes weakened it doesn’t matter if you wanna accept it or now. Byzantine and Sasanid empire been fighting a series wars including : The Anastasian War(502 -506) The Iberian War (526 to 532) The Lazic War (from 541 to 562) Byzantine-Sasanian War of 572-591 And the Byzantine-Sasanian War of 602-628 being the most brutal phase. Now 2 Powerful empires fighting for this long time obviously weakened the empires i am not denying that they compared to the arabs still were strong but A major reason why they lost is because they became a shadow of their formar selves. They lost majority of their veterans,generals in this war.The Byzantine Empire was affected, with its financial reserves exhausted by the war and the Balkans now largely in the hands of the Slavs. Additionally, Anatolia was devastated by repeated Persian invasions; the Empire's hold on its recently regained territories in the Caucasus, Syria, Mesopotamia, Palestine and Egypt was loosened by many years of Persian occupation.

[@QaribArcadia]

@@xmfr7578 That estimate is overly exaggeration by contemporary arabs. They wanted to glorify khalid a bit too much. And byzantine never used such a massive number in any battle in its entire history. The actual number could anywhere from 20000-150000 Walter kaegi(Byzantine historian): "The Byzantines, together with their Christian Arab allies, probably enjoyed numerical superiority, having troops that totalled up to 15-20,000 men, possibly more." John Haldon(British historian)2008 "The numbers fighting on each side are impossible to determine. [...] A total imperial force of about 20,000 would, therefore, be not unreasonable, although this remains a guess." It is sure that Byzantine atleast outnumbered the arabs 2:1

[@o_6095]

@@QaribArcadia An illogical comparison, the Arabs were also exhausted by the civil wars called the wars of apostasy, and there were continuous naval raids launched by Abyssinia on Arab ports, and the Arabs did not only confront the Romans, but even the Persians, and in all battles the numbers of the Romans and Persians were much greater than the Arabs, take Bearing in mind that the environment of the Arabs is dry, desert, harsh, and with little food and water, to the extent that sometimes when the Arabs travel thousands of miles to confront the enemies, they used to eat their horses from the severity of the lack of supplies. What the Arabs did during that period is like a miracle, with all due respect to Napoleon’s leadership and my words. It is not motivated by hatred, but there are vast differences between Napoleon and Khaled Ibn Al-Walid. Napoleon won 40 battles and the rest of the battles he was defeated in. Khaled Ibn Al-Walid won more than 100 battles and was not defeated in any battle throughout his life.

[@QaribArcadia]

@@o_6095 Not a fair comparison. The ridda wars happened in only 1 year while the sassanid and byzantine fought in The Anastasian War(502 -506) The Iberian War (526 to 532) The Lazic War (from 541 to 562) Byzantine-Sasanian War of 572-591 Byzantine-Sasanian War of 602-628(one of the most devastating) The devastating impact of this last war, added to the cumulative effects of a century of almost continuous conflict, left both empires crippled. Winning the ridda wars had an advantage, it allowed abu bakr to have control over the entire arabian peninsula and start campaigns in persia, while the continuous conflict of the 2 major powers were futile. Roman historian Cassius Dio said "the never-ending cycle of armed confrontations" and observed that "it is shown by the facts themselves that [Severus'] conquest has been a source of constant wars and great expense to us. For it yields very little and uses up vast sums; and now that we have reached out to peoples who are neighbor of the Medes and the Parthians rather than of ourselves, we are always, one might say, fighting the battles of those peoples." The Sasanians were further weakened by economic decline, heavy taxation from Khosrau II's campaigns, religious unrest, and the increasing power of the provincial landholders. While the Byzantine Empire was also severely affected, with its financial reserves exhausted by the war and the Balkans now largely in the hands of the Slavs. Plus these 2 powers didn't get much time to recover because arabs(united by religion) started attacking them. So the Ridda wars does not compare to the almost century of fighting and loses between these two great powers.

[@fq1487]

Khalid man he led more than 100 battles and is unbeatable. Military colleges are still studying his tactics in the curriculum.

[@buzzkill36]

What military colleges?

[@sanilyadav591]

Battle of Muta'h

[@cheezyfan6941]

@@sanilyadav591 I always see people who dont like Khalid ibn walid use this argument but he wasnt the main commander of this battle

[@Landotp]

Military schools study napoleons tactics more than any other general

[@sanilyadav591]

@عمران What Shivaji Maharaj even though small army tore Afzal Khan .... Don't forgot that?.....

[@adrigenmullaj4047]

Khalid is a lion

[@balboabxg]

The sword of Allah ❤

[@Brawlslopes24]

Napolean vs a dragons

[@Cheems002]

But Napoleon is a tiger

[@Lord_Imperion55]

Napoleon is a Wolf

[@dorado7157]

Napolean is the super power at his time 🔥🔥.... But khalid finished two superpowers at his time..... If napolean comes at Khalid's time.... Khalid had records by finishing 3 superpowers 🤌🤌🤌 THE UNDEFEATED COMMANDER KHALID IBN VALEED 🔥🔥

[@squidward4707]

napoleons just gonna shoot him and move on

[@johnbrang1855]

Nepoleon defeated PRUSSIA RUSSIA SWEDEN AUSTRIAN EMPIRE BRITAIN MORE THEN 5 TIMES WHAT YOU MEANNNN

[@touseefkhattak7883]

​@@johnbrang1855 You don't know anything about Khalid bin Waleed. You don't even know that Khalid bin Waleed defeated two superpowers of his time and those two superpowers were Khalid bin Khalid. They united and fought against Khalid Ibn Waleed (RA) and they were still defeated by Khalid Ibn Waleed (RA). More than a hundred battles and didn't lose a single battle.

[@kaniox141]

​@@touseefkhattak7883he did in fact lost battles read more books bro and he brought 0 empires to it's knees

[@bobDudeLikesPoo]

​@@touseefkhattak7883biast ngl, napoleon would slam him thi

[@Ishlino]

The loyalty of Khalid and his armies are unmatched.

[@MostBusYt]

Spartans; lol

[@teamgamespace5708]

Non

[@MicrowavedBurritosShadow]

What about Horatio Nelson’s troops loyalty? One time a soldier put his hand right infront of a sword that was going to hit Nelson.

[@salmanghani6149]

​@@MostBusYtyoung man you don't know nothing

[@MostBusYt]

@@salmanghani6149 I know well the sacrifice of Spartans

[@randyorton4739]

Khalid undefeated in the 100 battles

[@helloredmoon]

100+

[@xliquidatorx3306]

​@@helloredmoon 200*

[@jarogniewtheconqueror2804]

He did not fight 100 battles, he fought 30 plus, and lost at Mu'tah so not undefeated. Please at least look at a Wikipedia page before you comment

[@rehanansari2167]

@@jarogniewtheconqueror2804 Genghis Khan and Napoleon together cannot be defeated . khalid ibn al waleed . Sword of ALLAH . Title From MOHAMMAD (prophet) pbuh ☝️

[@rehanansari2167]

Khalid ibn al waleed never defeated more than 100 war ☝️

[@bryanchryst1272]

The sword of Allah never defeat.

[@Axel_Genius]

That's a stupid normal sword

[@Ares_123]

@@Axel_Geniusthen tell me have you won more than 100 battles like that normal sword? No. Then keep quiet.

[@Saleh1-]

​@@Axel_Genius Yes you know we call him like that? 145 wins and 0 lose much more than Napoléon.

[@Axel_Genius]

@@Saleh1- i think khalid won only 41 battels

[@Infix.amp7777]

​@@Axel_Genius 😂😂😂😂 Stupid

[@endless5352]

No one can match Khalid ibn Walid

[@kaniox141]

Napoleon no diffs him

[@iranickid]

@@kaniox141 no, Khalid no diffs him, there's nothing we can do

[@iranickid]

​@@kaniox141 Napoleon lost dude, Khalid never did, Khalid conquered so many places, he had conquered more then Alexander, when ever someone heard his name, they would be shivering, he also was usually outnumbered against very skilled generals but still ended up winning. not the same case with Napoleon, Napoleon was great but Khalid was greater and Khalid is the one who no diffs Napoleon, you know nothing about history.

[@NA-45.]

Hahahah so funny

[@Umbradeus-Rex]

@@kaniox141 napoleon is a joke compared to khaldi ibn al walid xD

[@amurihussein4940]

He didn't win Khalid ibn Waleed won "THE SWORD OF ALLAH"

[@NA-45.]

Bro 1 artillery fire > sword of allah

[@yamanabizadeh5061]

Khalid bin waleed is way stronger why do you think he was the sword of allah swt

[@Mxdrid]

Khalid bin Waleed is undefeated commander bro

[@adrienkeromest2744]

Battle of mu'tah

[@Cade423]

@@adrienkeromest2744 😂😂😂 if i ask you who pedaded battle of mutah you dont even know about it stop been a coward the leader of muslim was xayd bin harith and jacfar bin abi talin abd abdallah

[@MicrowavedBurritosShadow]

@@Darkskies1Retreating is losing, if someone is in a fight, and they run away mid fight, who is the winner?

[@PushDown99]

​@@MicrowavedBurritosShadowno winner

[@Lord_Imperion55]

That does not matter fighting in Europe is way harder then in the Middle East

[@zameersyed3053]

World biggest no 1 military general Khalid bin Waleed r a ❤️

[@iloveallah4279]

Yes Khalid ibn walid is the best no one can win against him in wars or competition he was too strong for everyone

[@christopherf8912]

Depends, in an open even field battle yes, Khalid would win, but in an even campaign Napoleon would definitely win.

[@AbdulRehman-pp3mc]

Prophet Muhammad saw says that don’t say anything to Khalid bin waleed why because he is the sword from the swords of god

[@christopherf8912]

@@AbdulRehman-pp3mc and the coalition said “don’t fight Napoleon in battle”. Why? Because when they did they got destroyed.

[@iloveallah4279]

@@christopherf8912 lol what about napoleon got attacked by rabbits and Waterloo

[@hashtagtiktok1903]

Khalid bi waleed total wars 400+ and more wars

[@Commader_stickman]

A video teach me how many wars do the country have napoleon has 250 ballte

[@Lord_Genghis_Khan]

30+major and 70 minor battle. Napoleon won 54 major battles

[@fellinglove2616]

😂😂😂🤣🤣🖐️🖐️ NO ONE IS EQUAL IS KHALID 😎😎😎

[@bruceadnan9011]

They can’t even realize How deadliest weapon Khalid bin walid was Subhan Allah.

[@thathistoryfam794]

Heraclius is 😂😂😂😂 tf? 🇬🇷🇬🇷✝️

[@fellinglove2616]

@@thathistoryfam794 you need reading of story of kahlid 🖕🖕🖕

[@md.sahjagan7244]

​@ooga booga i dont disrespect him my bro i want say tha he is undefeated warrior

[@user-ed3kr6dq8s]

@@fellinglove2616 bro you are muslim you cant insult the others like that shame points+++

[@QaribArcadia]

The ones who say khalid will win are Muslims who religiously preach about "sword of allah!" and are driven by emotion.

[@leonvoelker7639]

Exacly. They use baseless, exaggerated and highly biased accounts and numbers. While Khalid was an exeptional Commander and quite talented he would be beaten by Commanders Like Napoleon, Frederik the Great, Alexander, Hannibal, Caesar, Belisarius and many more and would probably find it hard to beat many other decently skilled commanders (especially in later Periods like Napoleonic wars, as they would have the advantage of the Evolution of tactics and strategy and formal education of basic tactics to officers or commanders).

[@Lord_Imperion55]

agreed dude Napoleon objectivly had better tactics, better strategy of course and his victory rate was 60 victories while khalid had 100 small victories while 13 of those victories were large victories against the byzantines and sassandinians and the arabs exaggerated his winning count so it couls be even lower and napoleon is just objectivly better because of his less casualties and better tactics and freedom of movement against the other force as well as him being 100 times better then khalid politicly. Khalid is only better by physical strenght and bravery. So napoleon 7 khalid 2...

[@n_vyas11]

Yes he was a great commander and fought extremly strong forces but the skill, tactics, and strategy of napoleon are undeniable.

[@EpicWatsonOneNew]

Well give a reason why he wouldnt win

[@nekogaming1715]

Khalid only fought 28 major battles, the rest are skirmishes. And all Khalid fanboys saying he won over 100+ battles, but couldn't even name those 100+ battles that Khalid won, no evidence to support.

[@notsparkyff3901]

Napoleon benefited from the large number of battles in which he led forces. Among his 43 listed battles, he won 38 and lost only 5. Napoleon Battles according to google

[@notsparkyff3901]

Khalid bin Walid (ra) victories speak volumes of what he accomplished. He was undefeated in 41 battles (100 if minor engagements are considered) against professional Persian and Roman armies.Khalid Ibn Walid (ra) battles according to Google.

[@nekogaming1715]

@@notsparkyff3901 Be objective Khalid only won 28 major battles

[@escorusexotic333]

​@@nekogaming1715names of 49 major battles which khalid bin walid fought Battle of Badr (624 AD) Battle of Uhud (625 AD) Battle of the Trench (627 AD) Battle of Banu Qurayza (627 AD) Battle of Khandaq (627 AD) Battle of Mu'tah (629 AD) Battle of Hunayn (630 AD) Siege of Ta'if (630 AD) Battle of Tabuk (630 AD) Battle of Yamamah (632 AD) Battle of Walaja (633 AD) Battle of Ullais (633 AD) Battle of Hira (633 AD) Battle of Al-Anbar (633 AD) Battle of Muzayyah (633 AD) Battle of Saniyy (633 AD) Battle of Yarmouk (636 AD) Battle of Al-Qadisiyyah (637 AD) Battle of Firaz (634 AD) Battle of Dathin (634 AD) Battle of Ajnadayn (634 AD) Battle of Maraj-al-Debaj (634 AD) Battle of Fahl (634 AD) Battle of Damascus (634 AD) Battle of Namaraq (634 AD) Battle of Saqatia (634 AD) Battle of Buwaib (634 AD) Battle of Uqhuwanah (634 AD) Battle of Naqra (634 AD) Battle of Zumail (634 AD) Battle of Firaz (635 AD) Battle of Ain-at-Tamr (634 AD) Battle of Wadi-al-Qura (634 AD) Battle of Dawmat al-Jandal (634 AD) Battle of Abraq (634 AD) Battle of Dumatul Jandal (634 AD) Battle of Zafar (633 AD) Battle of Fiqq (634 AD) Battle of Tartus (635 AD) Battle of Tabouk (Tabuk Campaign, 630 AD) Battle of Amghar (632 AD) Battle of the Apostasy (Ridda Wars, 632 AD) Battle of Dhu Qar (633 AD) Battle of Kazima (633 AD) Battle of Ghamra (633 AD) Battle of Saleh (633 AD) Battle of Tizab (633 AD) Battle of Abraq (634 AD) Battle of al-Qusayr (634 AD) There are more 50+ battles but given by arab sources that's why these European mfs can't accept that

[@doniyornorqulov6821]

"The sword of Allah" Khalid ibn Waleed 🕌🕋👳💚❤️🌙

[@AnelkaDavid]

Bro that just a random normal sword

[@paypol8866]

🔥Music name please... BTW Khalid bin Walid is my fav.

[@rayenbenrhouma2470]

Murder in my mind

[@XripLowsz]

Khalid, known as undefeated warrior of Islam, had a sharpest sword in the world that Allah gifts.

[@QaribArcadia]

Khalid was surely one of the best. But khalid fought against 2 greatly weakened empires. The Byzantine-Sasanian War of 602-628 was the final and most devastating of the series of wars fought between the Byzantine Empire and the Sasanian Empire of Iran. This bloody conflict crippled both empires and they didn’t get time to recover as khalid attacked sassanids at 633 and Byzantine syria at 634, battle of yarmouk was in 636. Plus the enemy numbers were exaggerated by arab accounts but its true that khalid was outnumbered most of the time and he was a brilliant tactician

[@jamamuhumed7952]

It doesn’t matter khalid came from. I empire a dessert even the romans said you look like hunger brought u here I’ll just give what u need every year and he replied you fool I do not need nothing from u

[@YourFellowMuslimBrother]

Bro Khalid was known for tactics and strength not to mention he has fought 2.5 million Europeans with just 10k soldiers and won not to mention Khalid has fought in over 100 battles in which he has never lost as a general or soldier

[@QaribArcadia]

@@YourFellowMuslimBrother Fought 2.5 million soldiers with only 10k troops? that's obviously an over exaggerated amount. Byzantine empire never had 2.5 million troops in its entire existence 😂especially not in khalid's time where it was heavily weakened for an almost century wars with sassanids. Modern historians say khalid was outnumbered definitely but not like that. And if you prefer those old arab exaggerated amounts than one can also believe in those greek estimates where Alexander fought Against millions of persians with 40k troops😂.

[@YourFellowMuslimBrother]

@@QaribArcadia Did I ever say Byzantine no I didn’t and that’s not exaggerated

[@regonfoong4770]

@@YourFellowMuslimBrother it’s literally impossible to muster 2.5 million troops, just because you’re Muslim doesn’t mean you blindly believe other Muslim historical sources without any skepticism

[@RONALDOCR-os3fr]

Of course Khalid bin Al Walid 💪🏼 He is the best general of all time. He defeat roman and Persian empires in only 4 years. He won more than 115 battles. He never lose a battle. He is the undefeated commander.

[@momosurat629]

Man really said that Napoleon had a bigger impact on history. Mf Europe ain't the entire world

[@L0G0R]

He spread revolutionary ideas, created the Napoleonic Code which is still the base of law for many countries today, spread Nationalism which would which cause the first and second world wars. Napoleon has had a huge impact on modern history.

[@srmagicpanda9606]

It seems that you forgot that the nations of Europe also owned América, África, Oceanía and a tons of Asian Countrys lol

[@squidward4707]

most nations currently existing in this world once belonged to europe.

[@forbes7410]

Yes he did. Look at who is better known today.

[@abzalkhan8233]

undefeated naam hi kaafi hai

[@moizkayani8790]

Loyal troops . seriously. When you study from WhatsApp university

[@Leo-lf4kb]

Bro gave victories,tactics and loyal troops to Napoleon respect for Napoleon though he was strong but not even equal to Khalid

[@FranceOnTop]

??? he was outnumbered everytime and he still claps europ wdym 😂😂 + his soldier were not as much trained as other nations

[@adamwahid1418]

Khalid has had more victories than napoleon and his tactics were better

[@user-ed3kr6dq8s]

@@FranceOnTop bro khalid ibn al-walid had this proplem too But Napoleon not able to win 5:1 battles, unlike Khaled Ibn Al-Walid :)

[@FranceOnTop]

@@adamwahid1418 he lol even mathematic prove othwise

[@FranceOnTop]

@@user-ed3kr6dq8s 5:1 battles wdym? and mathematically napoleon has a better war score , being the first in the world and khalid the fifth. the number of victories doesnt mean anything at all alone.

[@farhankhalil9568]

Khalid bin walid win 125 battle Khalid bin walid is greatest ever general

[@first-french-empire]

No

[@moneymaykerhustler]

@@first-french-empire lol sure ofc

[@moneymaykerhustler]

@@first-french-empire stupid baugette munchers

[@user-xb2ob9ph6x]

Napoleon Bonaparte: The Greatest General Called "The God of War" and "Nightmare of Europe" for a reason. Fought all of Europe 7 times, won 5 in a row. The Absolute GOAT 🐐🐐 No debate🐐🐐

[@HalalUser_1602]

Khalid ibn waleed is an UNDEFEATED warrior

[@nadeemkevka275]

Loyal troops? 💀

[@el_jaguar5122]

What do you mean?

[@Landotp]

His troops were extremely loyal

[@PushDown99]

@@Landotp muslims are more

[@infernoboi1503]

@@Landotp At some point they actually switched sides in the battle that decided his fate, Napoleon's troops joined the other troops bc he was losing.

[@Lord_Imperion55]

bruh dont evem Napoleon had the most loyal troops you can ask for they practically worshiped napoleon as a god they loved napoleon

[@mdshahnawaz4624]

You don't worry Napoleon is only a smart kid, leave aside of Khalid bin Waleed in terms of Nepoleon power, he cannot even stand in front of Timur Alexander Julius Caesar Sun Tzu Genghis Khan Saladin

[@YourFellowMuslimBrother]

Didn’t Khalid Ibn al Waleed (R.A) destroy the Romans , oh yeah he did

[@MicrowavedBurritosShadow]

@@YourFellowMuslimBrotherThe Byzantines were already weakened form previous wars.

[@Lord_Imperion55]

Napoleon objectivly had better tactics, better strategy of course and his victory rate was 60 victories while khalid had 100 small victories while 13 of those victories were large victories against the byzantines and sassandinians and the arabs exaggerated his winning count so it couls be even lower and napoleon is just objectivly better because of his less casualties and better tactics and freedom of movement against the other force as well as him being 100 times better then khalid politicly. Khalid is only better by physical strenght and bravery. So napoleon 7 khalid 2...

[@daisyfleur2334]

one of them is a real character acknowledged by all modern historians and the other is a mythical figure created by the Abbasids.

[@ghostsherry6806]

bro literally got This info from Starbucks

[@KingKhan-xw7vq]

Loyal soldier’s definitely goes to khalid ibn walid, he had to be retired because his soldiers wouldn’t go into battle without him and they almost started worshiping him in battle instead of god.

[@ZyadYounes-jg6ql]

Which historians I will believe : French historians who can write negatively or positevly about every men in their history and acknowledge and study France dark history and past crime Or Arab historians who are biased and cannot say a bad thing about any men in history of Islam in fear or prison or boycott?

[@KingKhan-xw7vq]

@@ZyadYounes-jg6ql with that comment I can clearly tell that you are racist or have a racial superiority complex. like everything that comes out of the west is good because “the west are the good guys that are never biased” -🤓 just because they are Arab doesn’t mean the sources are inaccurate, history is written by the victors as they say and this doesn’t exclude the French or any other nation, most could be biased, don’t just put Islam and Arabia under the bus.

[@christopherf8912]

@@ZyadYounes-jg6ql don’t bother with him, he clearly can’t handle any facts, and just has to resort to calling anyone who challenges his view a racist.

[@awaizkhan7200]

Our men love death more than you love your life ~Khalid bin Waleed

[@thedarksideofthemoon9195]

all these comments don’t even know who tf napoleon was 😂

[@Cade423]

you dont also know who was khalid learn history

[@thedarksideofthemoon9195]

@@Cade423 bro you all khalid fan boys can’t accept the truth ☠️☠️☠️☠️

[@TirabintaToktik-hz1lx]

Who tf is Khalid? DJ Khalid?

[@thedarksideofthemoon9195]

@@TirabintaToktik-hz1lx pretty much

[@Khaled-gv3ou]

Napoleon lost in many battles, while Khalid was not defeated in a single battle

[@jarogniewtheconqueror2804]

Battle of Mu'tah he lost that

[@SPECTER72]

@@jarogniewtheconqueror2804 The number of Muslims was 3,000, while the Romans had 200,000 armies. Secondly, Khalid was not defeated, but fought the Romans for six full days, and on the seventh day a tactical withdrawal, then the Romans were crushed in the Battle of Yarmouk, and the Muslims were victorious at that time. The number of Roman armies reached 240,000, and the Muslims 36,000. Read the history before you comment

[@jarogniewtheconqueror2804]

@@SPECTER72 200k Romans vs 3k Arabs? Clearly a deluded fanboy who only believes one side of the story literally. Even Alexander fanboys are not this stupid

[@SPECTER72]

@@jarogniewtheconqueror2804 clearly you are the fanboy who believes in one side of story when you say Khalid Ibn al-waleed has defeated while every source says he He withdrew tactically due to the difference in numbers between the Romans and the Muslims, and fought them for six days, and on the seventh day he withdrew, then returned and tore them apart in the Battle of Yarmouk.

[@Cade423]

@@jarogniewtheconqueror2804 you read history battle of mutah wasnt led by khalid battle of mutah was led by zayd bin harith he was killed then jacfar bin abi talib became the commander he was killed then abdallah he was killed the khalid he was given command by the prophet to go and save the troops he never engaged in a fight stop your propaganda nonsense over here and go study history kid

[@Xxxkxspspso]

Khalid ibn walid ❤

[@first-french-empire]

Napoleon ❤️

[@zeeshanahmadjejjejej]

​@@first-french-empire not campared to khalid he fight 150+battle and he was undeafeted.and he deafet superpower from small number of army with no equipment. Battle of firqz 15k vs 3lakh Khalid won And many more 150+👽💀

[@Lord_Imperion55]

Napoleon❤️ 🔥❤️ 🔥❤️ 🔥

[@ismoilmehriddinov9728]

No bro XALID IBN AL VALID WINNER

[@Lord_Imperion55]

learn to spell

[@Miro.A.Mursu-]

If Napoleon would know about Khalid, Napoleon would have been even more if a beast than he was! Which says a lot about how good both were in warfare!

[@NA-45.]

1 artilerry fire > sword of all*h😂😂😂😂💀💀

[@jamamuhumed7952]

Khabiib vs Connor See how bias disrespectful they was not to see the truth and honour and manners in khabiib compare to Connor mocking his religion country father wife politics If khalid was from them there would be 1000 movies made about him

[@VelvetRiver505]

underrated comment

[@skidz-]

LA ILAHA IL ALLAH, ALLAH HU AKBAR

[@spectrum6012]

Many comments, I would just say one fact: the real military genius is the one who defeats opponents while being outnumbered each single time, I won't dismiss what Napoleon and other great commanders achieved, but Khalid bin Waleed RA is simply unmatched, whether some like it or not, it's facts.

[@aimansyed7820]

Khalid did not die even though he drank Persian poison

[@dickfeynman7484]

Khalid ibn Al Walid is a true warrior.

[@who316]

Stealth and loyal troops I think should go to Khalid, but yeah feats is with Napoleon, even if Khalid fought the Roman and Persian empires together at the same time. Napoleon have more numbers up his sleeve, Khalid has better quality in terms of feats but that's it.

[@mdtalhaislam7868]

Khalid bin waleed is the Sword of Allah(swt) and and undefeated commander. So Khalid wins by negative differences

[@adrienkeromest2744]

Battle of mu'tah

[@zeeshanahmadjejjejej]

​@@adrienkeromest2744 First read history Undeafeted commander 150+battle My faovirate is battle of firaz 15k vs 3lakh Khalid won easily.💀👽

[@thepizza2472]

Battles won go's to Khalid he never lost a battle

[@adrienkeromest2744]

Battle of mu'tah

[@ahtishamshahid9805]

​@Adrien Keromest khalid was not the main commander general of mu'tah .. he was chosen by muslims during the battle when the top 3 general embraced martyrdom .. he safly retreated ..

[@Cade423]

@@adrienkeromest2744 grow up kid he didnt even lead at the battle of mutah

[@AstroResponds]

​@@adrienkeromest2744 he didnt lose battle of mutah

[@syn311]

Napoleon is nothing to Khaled

[@mhshazz6239]

comparing one who feared cat with THE SWORD OF ALLAH . LOOK THE HISTORY MAN

[@Mikail_Ash]

What loyal soldiers to napoleon? Wtf

[@christopherf8912]

Even with 2 free points, Khalid still loses to Napoleon. That about sums up the debate in it’s entirety.

[@Khan-ng4ts]

Napoleon is a thief's daughter 🤣😂

[@justa_noob]

Congratulations you have graduated from Shunga Bunga History Class 😂😂😂

[@touseefkhattak7883]

Haha he is a great lier or he don't know about history

[@Dr_Holiday]

😅 lol what?? Khalid clearly had the most loyal army you can ever wish for. None of them were being paid nor forced, it was do or die they all believed if they died they would go to paradise as martyreds. They were fearless men unleashed upon the world. How can you beat someone who has nothing to lose someone who sees paradise on the barrel of the gun.

[@Mohamed-Abed.Samed96]

😂😂😂😂 please don’t lie

[@Randomfootballlover22]

Bro gave Loyal troops to Napoleon 🤣🤣🤣

[@Sah1o-cu4cj]

Exactly 😂 bro flee himself and left his troops in eygpt

[@leonvoelker7639]

​@@Sah1o-cu4cj what about his veterans in the Old Guard? The would have and did die for him.

[@Sah1o-cu4cj]

@@leonvoelker7639they were not as loyal as the arabs to khalid

[@leonvoelker7639]

@@Sah1o-cu4cj how do you know that? Even if they weren't as loyal or more like fanatic they we're still far better soldiers.

[@Sah1o-cu4cj]

@@leonvoelker7639we know because khalid’s soldiers never left battlefield his did and even if they had better technology that point was given for loyality

[@helloworld4536]

Khalid fought with his untrained, not properly equipped or very advanced army against 2 super powers of that era. On the other hand Alexander had one of the most advanced well equipped well trained army of his time and still lost some battles. 🎤 dropped

[@akmalraihan198]

Khalid ibn waleed😎😎😎😎😘😘😘

[@Idkwhatorhow]

I don’t know why people create these videos knowing the comment section will be a bigger war zone than any other war zones these generals fought in. Just keep your opinion to yourself.

[@Not_-me]

In my eyes or anyone who know history alexander is way better than napoleon and Khalid ibn alwalid is better than alexander. Napoleon had the strongest army of his time and still couldn’t win Russia and lost two times. Alexander was great until he reached India he won the battle but couldn’t continue and escaped. Khalid on the other hard is the only commandeer you can say 100% undefeated.

[@yamanabizadeh5061]

Yeah but alaxander litrally couldn’t even conque India’s don’t say khalid bin waleed didn’t he conquered all of the Middle East and a quarter of Asia and also palestine he also conquered turkey which was also know as the Persian n empire he did aswell but it’s a Muslim country so that means there was no point of conquring turkey

[@yamanabizadeh5061]

So khalid would destroy them don’t think he’s stronger also in a 1 v 1 khalid would win both of them at once

[@Not_-me]

@@yamanabizadeh5061 true

[@iranickid]

bro learnt history from mcdonalds

[@zeeshanahmadjejjejej]

When you learn from indain whatsapp university. He was undeafeted and he crushed superpower from small number of amry with no equipment. He won 150+battle. 49 battle are large and important battle.

[@hhhhhhhhhhh209]

This Historian came from Whatsapp university 😆😆

[@mariaromeissa3405]

The white dude looks soft 😅😅

[@MicrowavedBurritosShadow]

That “white dude”? That is Napoleon Bonaparte who is debated to be the best general in history among Khalid, Alexander, and Julius Caesar.

[@ghostgivesmilk]

so comment section saying khalid can win against napoleon? damn we all know napoleon is more advance and has fought multiple empires at once and napoleon did lost some wars but its litteraly understandable for facing against 5 most powerful empires in Europe like napoleon has alot of advantages against khalid I mean just put some of the empire they have fought the British empire and the persian empire the British empire is more superior than persia and remember that napoleon is litteraly way more advance than khalid ok? and I'm basically ready to see you guys talk about khalid in the reply section I wouldn't mind napoleon would always be better than khalid at any ways

[@footballlife2799]

Damnnn bro you cracked me up 🤣🤣🤣 Chill, you cannot compare undefeated world class warrior to napoleon who was taken as war slave “twice”. Sure he did great things and his story is fabulous but you’re on napoleon side for religious stuff *probably*. When we talk about military leaders 1- Khalid comes first, 2- genkiz khan, Napoleon I would put him 6 on the list.

[@YourFellowMuslimBrother]

Imma end this man whole career. Khalid Ibn al Waleed was also known as the blade of god was said to have the best tacticts in history. He also fought and bested the romans. Yes the romains. The Byzantine empire pissed their pants when they saw him. He also conquered Iran,Iraq,Syria and 2 other countries. Oh yeah didn’t I also mention he fought and beaten an army of 2.5 millions EUROPEANS with just 10k soldiers? Oh yeah he also conquered most of Europe. Say what you will but he is just the goat. Btw he in his over 100 fights, has never lost as a soldier or commander. So yeah gg man Khalid Ibn al Waleed is going to destroy Napoleon

[@-ghostxexi-6605]

Napoleon isn't even close to khalid bin waleed 🤣🤣

[@LordChaos2010]

Almost everything you said is Wrong. Napoleon doesn't even touch Khalid in a single stat. Also comparing a Emperor with all the stolen money they have to a General who didn't have a 1% of the wealth Napoleon had :)

[@lDestroying]

Khalid ibn al-Walid could easily wipe out Napoleon he never lost a battle becuase Allah was supporting him

[@zakariyasyed6325]

still nepoleon was defeated and killed in battlefield and khalid bin waleed never got any defeat and there land which was conquered by him no one can conquer it till now

[@buzzkill36]

Napoleon wasn't killed in battlefield lol

[@jtmassecure4488]

@@buzzkill36Muslims don’t have great sentence structure skills.

[@ammarsamsoden4897]

If khalid is still alive This great guys will never gonna exist

[@albertoalezra3255]

THIS battle will destroy the entire internet ...

[@sahideditz313]

😑 khalid fought almost 200 battles and never lost a single one So how napoleon got that 2 free points? Also khalid was FAR stronger than Napoleon Btw NO HATE just for correction ❤

[@meyerswhyte]

Bollocks. Khalid won little over 50 major battles, it's only over a hundred if you count duels, skirmishes and raids

[@sahideditz313]

​@@meyerswhytesearch on Google

[@jtmassecure4488]

@@meyerswhyte 28 even that’s pushing it

[@Khan-ng4ts]

And son ask your father who was Hazrat Khalid bin Waleed then your father will tell you

[@unkillable1693]

There is a difference between napoleon and him and that is Napoleon has basically shaped our modern world and we are still technically in the napoleonic era because many countries today use the napoleonic code as for Khalid he was undefeated in many many battles and his strategies are being studied there is a massive difference between them

[@AhmedLone99]

Loyal soldiers napoleon. 😆 khalid r.a was unstoppable.

[@NapoleonBonaparte-of4sl]

I feel like Napoleon was the only that are not exaggerated as much as Khalid, many people said "Khalid win 60 vs 60k" but where's the rest 40k? Many people's literally exaggerates Khalid achievement, and those 100 "battle"? He only fought 41 battle. Not saying this because i thought he was just an idiot, he was a military genius but many people exaggerate him.

[@thehistory1639]

Ashurbanipal vs Nebuchadnezzar II Julius Caesar vs Cyrus the Great Khalid ibn al-Walid vs Nader Shah Umar ibn al-khattab vs Shapur II Can you make on those?

[@apollo8397]

Sure

[@REXREXMA]

khalid bin walid is the best dont compare him

[@sibatainraza215]

Are you kidding me?

[@anjutewari492]

Song name

[@paywandsalih2963]

Khalid was better, all the Muslim agree on this , he was best warrior everr

[@RELLAboodi]

Comparing the sword of allah to humans ?

[@Short-AKA-AKM]

Sword cannot protect guns( the god of wepon)

[@buzzkill36]

Napoleon would have shoved that sword right up this clown's ass

[@squidward4707]

that’s called name fallacy.

[@mdafjalansari-sf6cv]

Khalid bin Walid ke jaisa koi nahi chahe wo sikandar ho ya nepolian

[@xliquidatorx3306]

There is no way Napoleon can win against kahlid of it's a sword fight Army vs army Guns is different

[@abuomar9220]

Loyal trops with napoleon army better than khalid are you crazy the arabs have a sign win or die

[@noureddinebekhti9096]

Napoleon lost in the end , khalid ibn waleed never lost a single battle

[@marcingorminski797]

God save the Emperor! ✝️🇨🇵👑⚜️

[@karomiddinmamatqulov7598]

If you think like this let's fight.I will show you who is the real undefeated commander.Khalid ibn walid was unique commander.After him no mother can have a son like him.

[@janpipiet1606]

Never .khalid bin al waleed the nr 1 General in history.

[@JohnnyCheddar]

Bruh this just turned into Christianity vs Islam debate

[@mbahslamet3901]

Khalid ibn walid literally defeated the romans and persians

[@user-ex5np6ps2o]

The sword of Allah:🤡🤡 Nightmare of Europe:🗿🗿

[@Grand_Master12312]

Make oda nobunaga vs hannibal

[@islamicpostingstatus8161]

Kalid Ibn Owalid is Beast Hero ❤

[@alizedan4910]

Bro really didn't learn history💀

[@user-kh8et2bx1h]

Khalid bin Al-Walid won a hundred battles

[@yashdave7559]

Well its 50 - 50 cause Both of them are from different era And gap between thier eras is like more than 1000 years. If this battle khalid Era than khalid destroys napoleon. But if it's current hypothetical situation or napoleon Era than napoleon destroys khalid. Both defeated super powers of thier time but napoleon has an edge cause he fought first and third largest empires at that. And both of them were in prime

[@FilipinoPatriott]

why is there so much bias in this

[@naveedrehan2422]

Bruh doesnt even know that Khalid has won more battles like what so inaccurate

[@Sohaib57]

Khalid bin Walid never lost a battle

[@mini_mo7074]

Khalid ibn waleed won by far only eyes