How to see exploding star nova that NASA says to expect soon

[@tonyjohnson8752]

So when is it? Did i miss something?

[@daveh7720]

According to Wikipedia it's expected to happen some time between March and September of 2024, if it follows the pattern it's used before. (It's a recurring nova.)

[@suomi35]

My thoughts exactly

[@cristobalcardona4135]

Didn't it said that it is every 80 years, 2026, last was.in 1946! I'm still waiting for Betelgeuse!

[@tonyjohnson8752]

@@cristobalcardona4135 recent studies show Betelgeuse won't go supernova in our lifetime. I was so bummed when I found out. Watch Anton Petrov

[@RaduP66]

So goes our hope... 😁

[@jamesrose96]

Per NASA between Feb-Sept 2024

[@danwhite1198]

3000 thousand light years away? If we are seeing it now doesn't that mean that this happened 3000 years ago?

[@danwhite1198]

What is confusing is that with these super nova occurrences, they say "we predict" as if it has not happened yet. I would think that with a powerful telescope they should be able to see into the future and know that it is coming and are predicting when we can see the flash.@@johnmintalar

[@stevec2513]

I've had this exact question for days now. And conversely to your question, if this happens tomorrow for example, why don't we have to wait 3000 years to see the light?

[@danwhite1198]

Have you ever looked at the stars and planets through a earth based telescope? Planets appear round and you can even see the moons orbiting the planet although it is black and white and up side down. stars however look the same as they do without a telescope. This is because you can only see the ight generated by that sun according to its distance from earth. A telescope is actually looking into the future of that star so you can see the flash before it reaches earth. I have no idea how they calculate when the flash can be seen from earth. @@stevec2513

[@tyler4949]

@@stevec2513 if we see it tomorrow it would have still happened 3000 years ago and it just took this long for it to travel to us so it just looks like the present

[@dennishuffman785]

What date is it going to happen?

[@Carak_Oshama44th]

When??? Great video and all but never say the time window we think it will be able to be seen? Comet ? Nova ?

[@grijzekijker]

2:55 recurring event every 80± years, last witnessed in 1946

[@tylerfoss3346]

No dates of occurrence? No places to view these events? Why?

[@dlsamson]

Between now & September seems likely. Can't narrow it down any more but it gives you a chance to familiarize yourself with where to look

[@ReggieArford]

@@grijzekijkerSo, boom is in 1946 + 80 = 2026. Not this year, or even next year. Thanks for the heads-up.

[@ziziroberts8041]

Between February and September 2024. Keep Looking Up. 😊

[@gregmonks]

"Soon" in stellar terms could be hours or millennia. Don't hold your breath.

[@marianlucas2947]

This star exploded 3,000 years ago

[@cosmicinsane516]

They have multiple observation records of this particular nova going off every 80 years, so I would assume this one will go off generally when they expected.

[@bird4816]

It's not like predicting an eclipse. This star periodically goes nova in about 80 year intervals. About 80 years ago one was observed and 80 years before that.

[@thehellyousay]

this is a regular event with this binary star pairing because one of them is a white dwarf drawing mass from its red giant partner. they're talking about it because it's about to happen again, just like it did in 1946.

[@vkobevk]

not in this case, it mean next 3 months we talk about classic nova, not supernova you can predict with good accurency when nova going to shine

[@stevematthews4489]

The time factor is something that we tend to ignore when looking at stellar objects. We use the light year as a measure of distance but tend to ignore that it is also 3000 years past in time. Anything we see now happened long ago, and every object in the sky is at a different time in the past. Even our own sun is 8 minutes away.

[@LightsOnMultiMediaMindArts]

Exactly. This has implications in finding life elsewhere in the universe. It's not only a question of "where," but "when."

[@pennydezsi6073]

Ya that's true

[@manifold1476]

00:21 Why do you say "coroni" when the word is spelled 'coronae' ???

[@anthonyshiels9273]

The Narrator said "coronEYE", a valid pronunciation of the Latin "coronae" . Do you know how Julius Caesar pronounced his words?

[@michaelmcdonald3057]

Where in the sky? Lots of flowery dialogue, very little info.

[@therealcyber5]

look east

[@abdussohail9994]

We can check the location with app. Like stellarium

[@alanmcmillan6969]

Amazing. This a spectacle not to be missed. The movements of the universe continue to show new events

[@MexicoAdventurer]

This nova actually happened 3,000 years ago. The light from the explosion is arriving on the earth this year. For the few that are dim of understanding in the comments below, I am dismayed that I must explain the above statement. Light travels at one speed. It's called "The Speed of Light." It takes 3,000 years for the light of this nova to travel the distance of... here it is... 3,000 light years. Meaning, the event we are seeing unfold actually happened, occurred took place, 3,000 years ago. That's why it took this long, 3,000 years, for the light of the event to get here. Light can't go faster than the speed of light. If they still don't get it after that super-simplified explanation, then... can't help them. Researched it further on my own... there are two stars right next to each other, one is the size of earth but has the mass of our sun. It is absorbing hydrogen from the larger star beside it. It will be a NOVA, not a SUPERNOVA, because the small white dwarf will not entirely explode, only the hydrogen on the surface will ignite.

[@rubystripes26]

Uhmm you're actually quite wrong😅 This nova explosion happened at the year 1866 and was also seen at the year 1946.✨ Supernova & nova explosion are 2 different things. A nova does not destroy the star, and it may continue to undergo further explosions. A supernova destroys the star completely, leaving behind either a neutron star or a black hole 🕳️ Yes, this is called nova explosion not supernova because the star is not dead☄️

[@MexicoAdventurer]

@rubystripes26 Ummmmmmmmmm you're actually quite wrong. Light from *3000 light years away can not travel faster than the speed of light.*

[@WednesdaysDragon]

Be kind! We're all based on carbon after all... 💛 Right, wrong, just look at what the JWST is flipping around even for the earth's best astronomers! A novice enjoys both of your comments! 🙂

[@rubystripes26]

@@WednesdaysDragon you're right✨

[@WednesdaysDragon]

@@rubystripes26 So are you! 🙂

[@sassyrobin420]

Wow. A 3 in 1 year! I live in AR in a great spot for the eclipse. Hoping for clear skies.

[@morgunstyles7253]

When?

[@grijzekijker]

You can watch a small clip on your tablet after it has happened.

[@morgunstyles7253]

@@grijzekijker doesnt answer my question

[@grijzekijker]

2:55 recurring event every 80 ± years, last seen in 1946.

[@morgunstyles7253]

@@grijzekijker thanks

[@KennyG_420]

When Bettleguise gonna explode?

[@ScottClark-m9j]

I live in the mountains in the Philippines. A couple of weeks ago, I could have seen this Supernova. I saw a bright white circle light that only appeared for a few seconds. Than about 15 seconds later, I saw it again. It was larger than any of the stars. The only way I can describe it is when you look at a gold fish mouth. It was as round as that. It was pure bright white light. I have never seen anything like it in my life.

[@kimberleyoconnell2213]

Well that’s awesome!!! Idk if it was the nova but that sounds like an amazing experience whatever you saw! 🤩 maybe it was a UFO 🛸

[@pennydezsi6073]

So what kind of stair map is the best one to get

[@siquod]

Please dial back the prose.

[@borismedved835]

Excellent suggestion, but for now I have to keep snickering at this guy.

[@eriggle83]

It's really annoying.

[@AWICKEDVIXEN1999]

What is prose

[@montanausa329]

So it will take 3000 years for the light to get here, so we see what happened 3000 years ago

[@midnightkitty8172]

Precisely.

[@jchen1987]

TCoronaBorealis is listed in the star chart Subaru telescope livetream in YT, but only during daylight, rwd from 18:00 hr :(

[@theduduk]

NASA say between feb to september this year

[@cschiu8224]

Would you please provide the link to this message?

[@parumaksuda5589]

Very Sad. Please tell me, does it affect us ?

[@theduduk]

@@cschiu8224look for "View Nova Explosion, ‘New’ Star in Northern Crown" on nasa blogs

[@cosmicinsane516]

@@parumaksuda5589Why is a recurring nova sad? And other than being able to see a new star in the sky for a few days, no it won’t affect us at all.

[@jtoombs56]

I can’t find the nova star on SkyView. What constellation is it in?

[@daveh7720]

Corona Borealis.

[@AWayfaringstranger180]

It's next to Hercules at the bottom of his left foot. It is in the Northern Crown or Corona Borealis. The red giant might be Hercubolus or Nibiru or Betelgeuse. They use all different names to confuse people. It's huuuuuuuuuge and this is why they are worried.

[@100nanay]

I googled it but the instructions aren’t very clear either

[@siquod]

instructions unclear. blew up sun.

[@stphkp889]

How bright? How best to see it. Why is it recurring? How long does it last? Etc. etc.

[@bird4816]

Will probably be the brightest star in the night sky for a few days. This event is a recurring nova. A white dwarf is siphoning material from its red giant companion and it periodically explodes away material every 80 years. Look in the constellation Corona Borealis.

[@German_Rock_Tumbler]

I need to place my Telescope !! Thanks for the awesome video 😎👍👍

[@KTCowgill]

How long will this explosion last? Is that a dumb question? I guess I want to know if there will be time to go out and look if I hear on the news that it is happening, or if it's like a comet: you have days to try to catch a glimpse.

[@PETERJOHN101]

It will last for at least a couple of days.

[@AWayfaringstranger180]

​@@PETERJOHN101and maybe up to a week it says. "Ensign to the nations"???

[@midnightkitty8172]

May I please have a reminder when it begins?

[@BGC360]

Great ! I just need now a cristal ball to get the dates for the things you got me excited to watch. 😊

[@peatmoss4415]

*crystal ball

[@sunchildgaia]

LOL

[@Kreefix]

New star before gta 6 is hella crazy bruh

[@Mars-zgblbl]

Guaranteed my city will be overcast 🤦🏻‍♂️

[@faiththrower7951]

I know exactley what you mean.

[@bird4816]

It's supposed to be the brightest star in the sky for a few days at most so you have a chance.

[@dshazo3714]

Yay! I now live in a very rural area so it is dark dark a night. Crossing fingers for clear night.

[@sunchildgaia]

Are not you one lucky person! We have to search the moon :(

[@michellejulia384]

Wonderful vid. Really informative.

[@garycarter5641]

The title says to expect the white dwarf star to go supernova at some unknown time in the future.

[@daveh7720]

Nova, not supernova.

[@Michal-iz8mo]

To clarify the confusion: That Supernova exploded 3000 years ago and we will be able to picture it at some point in the future because it took that much time to travel to the Earth and to us to be able to see it. The “time” in the Universe is not working the same way as it does on Earth that’s why we’ve got theory of general reality.

[@thelazy0ne]

Tell me when! If I need philosophy or poetry I'll go to the library!

[@lokarthaaeris6506]

Well this nova was last seen in 1946. If it has a 80yr cycle then we should see it within the next 2 years. I'm assuming the best places to see it are in the southern hemisphere.

[@NullHand]

Nope. Northern hemisphere constellation. Corona Borealis literally means "Northern Crown".

[@michaelhaywood8262]

Isn't Betelgeuse expected to explode [supernova] and it will become as bright as the Moon. However astronomers cannot tell the timescale, could be this year or may not be for millenia.

[@vkobevk]

it is nova, not supernova you can predict when nova happen, mostly when the white dwarf come close it going to eat upper red giant atmosphere and go nuclear fusion with a nice big boom thermonuclear explosion for supernova it is harder, you need to know the star intern structure, so we cant know when the core going to collapse and change into iron

[@stevec2513]

Somebody PLEASE explain to me how we will see this in real time if it's 3000 light years away. It's not making sense to me. Thanks!

[@J.A.Z-TheMortal]

Im very very very far from an expert, but since you have not received an answer, here i go: everything that you see with your eyes is thanks to the light that bounces out of the object and is processed by your eyes. Since the speed of light is very fast, you are able to see most things instantly. However with celestial objects that is not the case. Since they are so far away from us. Their "light" literally takes YEARS to arrive on earth therefore be seen by your eyes. So if for example i was able to travel to a planet that is exactly 1 light year away from earth, and I were to turn a huge flashlight there for you to see, it would mean that it would take exactly 1 light year for you to see the flashing light, but since then, time has continued so i would have literally lived a full light year since the day i sent the flash your way. Since this star is so distant, this pulses or flashing events that we on the earth will be able to see soon, happened 3000 light years ago. So this star could have already exploded in what is called a super nova, but we won't be able to see that until the light of that event (if it already happened) arrives on earth. I know its a bit difficult to grasp, and perhaps this is not a perfect analogy, but think of airplanes on an airport. Tons of planes from the same city flight to your city and for all of them, it takes exactly 3 hours to arrive. However, if one plane departed at 7 AM it arrives at your city 10am. Yet multiple other planes are on their way, but because they departed afterwards they won't arrive until the time they departed + traveling time occurs. Let say another departed at 12:00pm plus 3 hours, equals 3pm, and so on. That's KINDA what happens with light or the images your eyes see. Perhaps even easier example: it takes the light off the sun around 8 minutes to arrive on earth. So, if you where to look at the sun, you are seeing what happened 8 minutes ago. Again, im far far faaaar from an expert and there are tons of excellent astronomy channels out there ( i personally recommend Anton Petrov , Dr Becky. Dr. Machio Kiku etc etc etc) but i hope this helped. Best of luck.

[@jackjackbt]

We will not see it in real time at all. It is so far away that we will see it as it was 3000 years ago because light doesn’t instantly get everywhere

[@jimmyhvy2277]

Northern Hemisphere only ?

[@DebbieStallard-r1p]

So, how do you see it?

[@peatmoss4415]

With your eyes....

[@carollutsinger8333]

some of us need to chill-supernovae cannot possibly predicted on a human clock's schedule.- they explode when they explode. sheesh,

[@PETERJOHN101]

It's not a supernova and recent activity indicates a 90% chance that it will occur inside the 7 month window.

[@vkobevk]

you can predict nova, because you know when the white come close to the red giant and begin to eat upper atmosphere of red giant

[@AWayfaringstranger180]

Lately they are saying next month, May.

[@galadethlaernis6266]

Really!?? Where? Any references?

[@user-Mike755]

Let’s take a telescope look back in time and see it when it happened or closer to when it happened!

[@Stangmaster]

It exploded 670 years ago, the light is just getting here.

[@user-gp3hv9fz2d]

They say it will happen in August, and that it is the fastest recurrent nova with P = 80 years.

[@thehellyousay]

a white hot stellar core the size of earth devouring a red giant with an diameter of tens of millions of miles across ...

[@sunchildgaia]

fascinating, huh?

[@mbterabytesjc2036]

😅 Great. When would be great or state the exact time is unknown but the range is believed to be between this and that. Also where and when to observe would be wonderful. Small note Coronae Borealis does not appear above the north east night horizon until after April 29thish from the 37th parallel per Google Sky Map, so hopefully it happens after this date.😮

[@dcartier1692]

A lot of speculation - like Halley’s comet’s last pass?

[@jordandryer116]

It's happening now!

[@LightsOnMultiMediaMindArts]

It already happened but the "news" hasn't reached us yet.

[@chaycunningham1999]

Wonder if the sock theif is hiding out there ¿

[@WednesdaysDragon]

Ren and Stimpy! Space cadets! 😂 The planet of left socks!

[@erikb3309]

Teecaroni

[@WednesdaysDragon]

Is there such a thing as a Astro-referee? 🤔 This thread could sure use one! Be excellent to each other! The J.W.S.T. is flipping everything we know astronomically as we type anyway! 🌠🌌🌠

[@matthewdavies2057]

Dummy also failed to mention it's in the Northern hemisphere, looking North. Not visible during winter from the West coast.

[@LancerMyMan]

“T” not “Tau”? The chart show in the video is showing Greek characters.

[@nealmcb]

Yes, that is one of the many flaws in this video. The portion of sky depicted with the Greek letters doesn't even include the star we're talking about, T, not tau. T is over near epsilon Corona borealis.

[@peatmoss4415]

If this wasn't a computer voice and AI narrative , then it is from someone that just got a new dictionary for Christmas...

[@ashokkumar-zw8vi]

Nah Betelgeuse supernova will be better. But it is unpredictable. At least this nova is somewhat predictable. Oi Betelgeuse,blow up already!!!

[@bobwitkowski6410]

Missing is the dates this will happen

[@sarahfinnigan7002]

Rivals the North Star? 🤨

[@dera6347]

If a blackhole is the remains of an exploded star, then why hasn't this system turned into a black hole?

[@Jack_The_Operator]

Either the star isn't heavy/too small, or there IS a black hole that we don't know of which is very, very highly unlikely. But its most likely the first one since its just a nova, not a super nova, the star that's having a nova is too small to have a super nova, and too small to become a blackhole / neutron star, so it turns into a white dwarf which our sun will become as well in another 4 to 5 billion years, hope this helps you.

[@vkobevk]

both star are too small, they are only white dwarf

[@ryanabrams5980]

David borealis what

[@CarlosPerez-f3x]

Saludos desde la frontera Mexicana Nuevo Laredo Tamaulipas Mexico, excelente trabajo videografico, muy buena nota reporte, gracias, bendiciones y un fuerte abrazo. 🙄🙂👍☮♾🛡🏁 mis plegarias y pensamientos por y con la infancia Afgana en cuevas y cavernas que también sueña con las maravillas del Universo.

[@bettyg7710]

wait til they tell us it's happening and see the pictures they take.

[@dougcarver498]

That star is 550 light years away so did it explode 550 years ago

[@ruthyt3715]

"not to be missed", unless you live in the southern hemisphere...

[@MANGO31892]

Are we gonna die

[@cristianocunha5672]

I hate how amazing astronomic events are only visible in the north hemisphere....

[@KTCowgill]

Yep. And I hate how cold it is when I can see all the stars in the sky, but we can't have it all...

[@jackjackbt]

At least you have LMC and SMC… right?

[@Viking_6_3]

Happened 3,000 years ago.

[@Amradar123]

So: somewhere in 2024 a small star will be visible again for some weeks at magnitude 2 in the Corona Borealis constellation. Exiting. Zzzz The physics behind it is more spectacular then the observation itself😊

[@MagnificoGiganticus]

A star can repeatedly go nova? More to read I guess.

[@NullHand]

Nova just means "new", and in the days of naked eye astronomy with no photographs, was applied to any star that brightened enough to suddenly become visible. Later studies found that some of these brightened repeatedly, and were visible telescopically in their normal dim state. Some, however were found to leave behind just a glowing cloud, that even later might be found to contain a strange repeating radio source. The former, more common brightening then fading back stars retained the term Nova, and are usually the white dwarf accreting binary type described in this video. The kind that blow the star into a glow cloud are a terminal event for a star. They might leave a collapsar remnant, but it won't be optically visible. These were given the new term Supernova. In standard comic book naming convention, we have recently added "Kilonova" and "Hypernova" to the pageant of misbehaving stars.

[@dreadminion1284]

Thank you for the clarification, I was confused thinking a white dwarf going beyond critical mass resulted in a black hole, or a quasar, or whatever (my apologies I'm not educated, but fascinated 😂). Your explanation cleared that up beautifully only to open several more rabbit holes. I'm now thinking that separate incidents lead to different outcomes, but how?😂 Is big red's mass not reaching the core of the dwarf but instead acting like a very high mass coronal ejection every 80 years? Is the dwarf too far away to accumulate the mass quickly enough to blow itself apart and get all noisy with the radio waves?....the wonder of science is the greatest gift that comes with understanding. Again thank you for opening the door of one rabbit hole to five more 😊

[@NullHand]

@@dreadminion1284 All of Science is a "rabbit hole" warren like you describe. And it is glorious! But the deeper you go the heavier the math dirt gets! And don't get me started on the cost of the ever longer shovels needed....

[@NullHand]

@@dreadminion1284 Your guess about differing conditions making the star-fireworks outcome is right on the money. The primary condition turns out to be the mass of the star-ish thing about to go boom. The repeating binary Nova described here is the lowest mass condition. The white dwarf is the core of a smallish star like our Sun that had only enough mass to fuse hydrogen to helium, and then maybe some helium into carbon and oxygen. Then fusion stopped. The white dwarf left behind is a white hot glowing cinder of carbon and oxygen at stupid density, and now about the size of planet Earth. In the case in the video, the companion star is now entering the end of its fusion lifetime, and swelling up as a red giant. This allows a transfer of some of the red giants un-fused outer hydrogen layers to acrete onto the hot dense white dwarf as a thin outer layer. At some level of added fuel, that thin hydrogen rich layer detonates in a fusion explosion. In this case, the mass of the white dwarf is still small enough not to go super-nova, so it survives, to repeat the process every 80 years or so.

[@CAELUSTHEPLANET]

I’ve started watching the start but I’m gonna guess he’s talking about Betelgeuse

[@peatmoss4415]

Nope, wrong direction. Look north.

[@aengusmacindoic4084]

Can I follow the new star to the new messiah? 😊

[@oby-1607]

Hopefully, its not a gamma ray burst that fries the planet we live on.

[@user-Mike755]

Maybe a telescope doesn’t look back in time?

[@jackjackbt]

Yeah. But even though light is the fastest thing in the universe, it still will take a long time to reach us due it it’s distance. So what we see now is how the star looked 3000 years ago. (That doesn’t go for all stars because some stars are closer or father away)

[@garycarter5641]

NASA is saying the Red Giant Betelgeuse will go Supernova with in the next ten years.

[@catman8965]

Astrophysics say Betelgeuse will go supernova anytime in the next 100,000 years.

[@vkobevk]

the video talk about nova, not supernova a nova you just need to know when the white dwarf going to close to the red giant

[@DoreenBellDotan]

Please bear in mind that the recurring period of sexual receptivity in female mammals is called Estrus. Another way of putting it is that she is "in heat".

[@SidneyMae-n4r]

Super cool, but way over hyped. Expexted to be like +2 magnitude. So it puts it in about the top 30-40 brightest stars.

[@adamf663]

Soon being some time in the next 10,000 years.

[@jerometaperman7102]

For the record, Polaris, the North Star, isn't really very bright.

[@dougcarver498]

For us to see it it would have to had exploded 550 years ago

[@اسماعيلمحمداسماعيلمحمدرشيد]

you msat blevb the good

[@cecilionembraceofnight486]

🤩🤩🤩

[@Harve955]

What overly romanticised, word piece of crap. just let the story tell itself.

[@link7412]

The Star of Bethlehem is about to light up. Jesus is coming back to this flat earth!

[@galadethlaernis6266]

.... irregularly shaped ellipsoid.

[@jackjackbt]

Naw Earths a square

[@NileshManandhar]

It is a nova not supernova

[@gregkozlowski5375]

So many "intelligent" comments...

[@md.shamimrahamantutul4913]

i know the Explosions place

[@weinerdog137]

Not a supernova,. A reoccurring micronova. One of a few dozen acknowledged, but it looks like micronova is very common. Like really common.😅

[@lenhanley5177]

Signs in the heavens. (Luke 21:11,25) A testament to God the Creator.

[@juhajuntunen7866]

Binary star goes non binary?

[@JonBlondell]

No dates for eclipses! Boo

[@robbweeks]

All in all, this did nothing to help a novice view this celestial event.

[@SovereignSoulSamQ]

Just a coincidence its corona .....

[@bryanjoachim5655]

Better get some sun block.

[@jackjackbt]

Why?

[@runebel]

W H E N ?

[@kurtisengle6256]

But, but, but, but, but I don't beeLEEEVE in science ! I'm a Catholic ! GAW Did IT ! They told me on Sunday ! (And then they smacked my hands with a ruler) Here we go... Watch that spot in the night sky, where the Corunaea will happen. Just like it did several times before. And don't tell me god told me to tell you, using your mighty keyboard and mouse.

[@jackjackbt]

What

[@mq172]

"Rivals the luminosity of the North Star"...? Have you guys *seen* the North Star? It's like Trump: not really very bright at all.

[@DingoDoggie]

Says a View watching TROLL

[@grijzekijker]

Hey look, a polarized radioactive commenter 😢

[@mq172]

@@DingoDoggie Are you kidding? I wouldn't turn my head to watch those stupid c#nts on The View. Furthermore, while Broke Orange Hitler is, certifiably, a f#cking moron, Genocide Joe is falling all over his dick in order to sell *more* arms to racist child murderers. So...... your attempted insult went quite wide of the target. Perhaps, *someday*, America will field a candidate who isn't just another anti-human corporate tool.

[@brianSalem541]

It's bright enough to see from most places.

[@Brisco_County_Jr]

Oh no TDS has made it into the comments.

[@romnickbuenaflor4703]

we wil see it after just 3000 years yet? 😂😂😂

[@jackjackbt]

No. What we will see is what happened 3000 years ago. But it will not take 3000 years for us to see it. Light is fast, but the star is very far away from us. This means that it takes 3000 years to reach our eyes

[@Wesley_H]

This did not age well.

[@darcymck1]

to see where the billion of dollars gone and for what?

[@Hairytoe1]

All I'm hearing is that 2024 is going to be the end time.