Google’s Quantum Chip: Did We Just Tap Into Parallel Universes?

[@MasterMayhem78]

Skynet approves this message

[@MirceaKitsune]

"Just think of how many people this can censor and repress in the name of stopping hate and protecting children 😃"

[@I.Am.Nobody]

@@MirceaKitsune it could hack any existing computer (edit: as long as it can get access)

[@jfitnesshealth]

And Genesis. Qubit says both exist and don't lol

[@dharmendrakumarnayak5144]

[@aubreytacopirate7625]

So what was the question that it solved in five minutes and what was the answer?

[@brokegymrat8354]

Imagine in 100 years we gone have all this like smartphones in our hands and still no gta6

[@jaseboon6282]

The Willow chip is telling you you're in GTA 6 there is no 7

[@SquirrelMaster69]

GTA 6 will be woke.

[@NickJoeBeg]

ur sleep talking again, wake up and smell your cuck dumb-

[@hurtighansen1]

I was a kid, we had typeriding in school, 9 class first computer came. So what is it. We asked, "it's a new smart typewriter" they say. think my first pc, did go 20 years. I wish we had like 10% of what we have today. i'm a autodidakte pc wizard today.

[@plashplash-fg6hd]

Quantum computing chip before GTA 6 LoL.

[@tacobo]

It would be amazing if it could give us an accurate weather report, 24 hours into the future. We still are trying to achieve that.

[@1Fat_Albert1]

@@tacobo So dumb. Weather prediction is an educated guess, unless you got a crystal ball we don't know about.

[@robertd9850]

Actually, we've gotten quite good at that.

[@vmusatov]

In different parts of our town at the same time it’s different weather. In the same spot at the same time there is different temperatures at the road surface and in the air. You can’t possibly predict something that is that diverse. I mean you can, but it’s not going to be for everyone or for every spot in town. And that’s what forecasts are already very good at

[@nashlimuniyaYT]

@@1Fat_Albert1 in 2024 it is hard to predict weather

[@Space97.]

That's already possible 😂

[@garethcroson8851]

No. They didn’t prove that parallel universes exist. Sabine Hossenfelder released a video yesterday debunking that. I’m beginning to think that you’re not really NASA. Something I’ve suspected for a long time now.

[@peterphilipsen8136]

Its because you learned history from the American point of view. All options are still open for the public. Only a few know the real truth. They already knew about quantum over 150 years ago. We see things from frequencies. A dog or a cat could already see a different Universe, cause you dont know the frequentie and how it is translated to the brain, 1D, 2D, 3D, 4D? You dont know. I dont know. Only a few

[@SymphanyinSorrow]

From their about area on their channel page, "We are not affiliated with NASA or any other space agency, but we share their passion and curiosity for the wonders of the universe." Not condoning anything, but yes, they are definitely not NASA

[@Chase1399Aviation]

@@SymphanyinSorrow Social Media is full of people who don't dig deeper and only form an opinion with the least amount of information they can digest.

[@renofry]

In a parallel universe, Sabine Hossenfelder is a sane and rational scientist instead of a click baiter.

[@thenamechuck2699]

@@garethcroson8851 lmao that is literally one person out of the whole scientific community which strongly believes in quantum physics

[@cyber4joy]

I don't get it. How can this chip calculate something so fast theoretically compared to our existing chips and be sure that it came up with the correct answer? We have no way of verifying the results are true, lol.

[@gabrieldimanche8458]

Because the result is an equation you can use in our tradition understanding of relativity and science as we know , example the trajectory of an object leaving earth reaching mars , planets are constantly moving and moving thru the cosmos plus multiple object are in the trajectory you could ask it for the ideal trajectory and speed angle etc … it would take a few seconds normally you would need years and multiple teams computers and computation to do it all you need to do now is confirm the trajectory given

[@tehf00n]

@@gabrieldimanche8458 In all fairness you don't need a quantum computer for that in close enough to realtime. It's standard trigonometry, statistics and as long as your floating point is high enough the accuracy is can be down to almost certain perfection at the current stage of events. However even if you calculated all the possibilities of potential events which could occur, which may not even need quantum computing for purpose as it would be done out of realtime scenarios, your example is still fundamentals of trig, algebra, calculus. All of which current computers can do and can be scaled easier.

[@davidbangsdemocracy5455]

It is possible to verify the answer of many hard problems. For example, it is tricky to calculate a square root but easy to multiply the answer by itself to verify you get the original number back. It may be tricky to think of a list of 20 words that all rhyme, but is easy to verify that they do rhyme.

[@thenamechuck2699]

@@tehf00n let’s say me and you went to war and my weapon is using quantum physics while yours is using just regular physics. My quantum computer would pinpoint you faster than your regular computer could pinpoint me. Even though your computer can do the exact same calculation, mine is faster and more accurate. Also if regular physics could do everything quantum physics could do, then quantum physics would just be classified as physics and quantum physics probably wouldn’t exist. Clearly that’s not the case

[@malikgriffin2073]

@@tehf00n I’m fairly certain that most of our physics calculations rely on approximations, as they require us to hold many variables constant. With quantum computing, however, we could go beyond these approximations and start answering fundamental questions about our universe with far greater accuracy.

[@rmvanroosendaal]

So it’s basically like Naruto making hundreds of shadow clones to learn Rasengan. Understood.

[@ultimatesunrise]

Thats all great but dont let it distract you from the fact that Al Bundy scored 3 touchdowns in one game while facing his arch nemisis "spare tire" Dixon.

[@savethisforlater]

4 touchdowns, it was 4.

[@ytubeanon]

never forget it was 4! now Bud and Kelly, tell your mom I'll be at the shoe store

[@YsigoSiendoelReydeCorazones]

@@savethisforlater According to willow quantum states , there is an alternative universe with 4 touchdowns. 🤔😁😂

[@manicmasterofmetal2620]

@@ultimatesunrise in an alternate universe Kelly is a genius, bud scores with lots of women and Marcy isn't a chicken.

[@ryszardfalkowski7917]

@manicmasterofmetal2620 In real life BUD did score with many women 😀, ...there is not a single universe out there where Christina Applegate actually has MS , she's lying in all of them

[@stevelenores5637]

The answer is no. Superposition doesn't prove parallel universes, only that we don't fully understand the universe we do live in. There are engineering problems that can only be solved using imaginary numbers (i equal to the square root of a negative number). There is no there there at the imaginary positions but there is a there there at the solutions that aren't imaginary. Superposition is the same way. It's a convention that allows you to come up with right answer quickly. We just have to learn how to error correct faster (throwing out the solutions for parallel universes or other impossible solutions). It will take some maturity in the scientific community but hopefully they will learn to work with what we do know and not what we wish we knew.

[@Geffo555]

Isn't the answer yes and no?

[@ryszardfalkowski7917]

There are different dimensions, which is a scientific fact , but how many is the real question. The idea of a multiverse is a ridiculous one , we haven't even explored 90% of our oceans. We haven't even explored 1% of our solar system , nevermind Milkyway or even the visible universe. We know very little about the most complicated thing in our universe, the human brain 🧠 , and some are advocating for a multiverse? Imagination can be good, even great , for inventions and for its usefulness, but imagining there is more than one universe is WILD. 😂

[@123tominator007]

@@Geffo555 maybe...

[@nesicus]

We live in a simulation. There is no "multiverse." There is simply simulated computation; what "quantum computers" are doing is "hacking" the simulation -- basically usurping the "hardware" resources of the "server" which hosts our "reality" to perform computations outside of time. It's simple, and obvious. I've been saying this for years and I don't know why it's so hard for people to understand. Entanglement is easily explained with a simple analogy to a video-game environment. You have a "user," and a video-game engine/server environment, and an "avatar" which is the experienced holographic reality. The engine mediates between the two planes. A particle can affect another particle across vast distances simply because it's merely a matter of flipping a variable within the backend of the hosting computer (simulation.) In an FPS game, a missile may take a certain trajectory and have a certain time of flight and arrival at a certain destination from a certain source, throughout the "space" within the environment. But the "master user," the simulation creator -- God, the Grand Architect -- can simply flip a variable within the system's hardware and cause simultaneous action at Point A and Point B with respect to the context of the observer within the simulated environment.

[@NotMatt420]

@@nesicus whos the god in this sense?

[@garynaylor7247]

We made this. We don’t know exactly how it works. -Google

[@davecurry5604]

Who said we made it? 😮

[@PithyGamingClips]

The real question is............................................... Can it run Crysis?

[@stevejordan7275]

Better than anything. But they'll have to re-develop the game. After they develop an OS...or develop it so it runs on bare metal. Then you have to ask...will it still be Crysis?

[@PithyGamingClips]

​@@stevejordan7275If they have to redevelop Crysis to run specifically on this chip, then the answer is no. 🤷🏻

[@stavastava9803]

@@PithyGamingClips this is such a 2007 question

[@jedi4049]

@@PithyGamingClips no need more qbits

[@joshcantrell8397]

What exactly was this problem it solved so quickly?

[@thepiebaldunicorn]

That's my question too!

[@fd-tl4ld]

lol

[@Ancientalienshistory]

I’ve poured so much effort into this video. I’d love for you to watch it and share your thoughts!

[@moiraatkinson]

It’s one of the best videos you’ve made, I think. Very interesting - I didn’t want it to end!

[@FrankBott]

This year working with an AI agent we have been trying to find answers and knowledge in this subject. Not easy. You did a great job tackling a tough subject.

[@Ancientalienshistory]

@@FrankBott Thank you so much!

[@johnthecloud]

When it can do something practical, and not just something that has been specifically set up for it, then I'll get excited.

[@mygirldarby]

If Sabine had been alive during Einstein's life she would have been critical of his discoveries as well. Much of what Einstein came up with wasn't immediately useful.

[@vladimirshterev1988]

Totally agree! Thats why Sabine is KZbinr not a Science who can discover and evolve science ...

[@Dustinthewind108]

Finding YT commenters who don't take Sabine Hossenfelder's opinions as incontrovertible fact is a breath of fresh air. ✊

[@ghoraxe9000]

Answers 42 right?

[@jeffmartin_UK]

ohh. You beat me to it. 😢🤣

[@allenmorgan4309]

Just because it can see all possibilities at once in superposition doesn't mean that everyone of those potentials are a universe to themselves. The potentialities don't become reality until one is chosen.

[@kerzhemanov]

What happens when you observe one of two intangled particles? Does its potentiality become real at this moment? And if so then how the other particle knows about the new "real" state of the first one? Take into account that the particles may be observed in any order and time and that at time of the observations they may be at any distance from each other.

[@lettuceprayamen]

Some very intelligent people out there developing things such as this.

[@itstk8828]

The lady who says there is no practical uses is INSANE...if these things are able to work alongside other multiversal versions of itself then we could very well prove the theory if properly applied, potentially even communicating with other universes...imagine talking to yourself from another timeline, what an insane breakthrough that would be, then upon being able to share EVERYTHING EVER discovered in any universe, the amount of breakthroughs that could be attributed to just this chip.

[@Whysicist]

Mathematically speaking… the parallel universe is strictly ‘between the ears’. Or ‘labels’ don’t really matter to Mother Nature, eh?

[@anthonytafoya6339]

My question is what problem and how do we know we solved it?

[@Geffo555]

Are the other universes sending Schrödinger drones to investigate.

[@YoutubeZiChi]

Yes and also quantum plasma orbs

[@LightEye-108]

*Draco alien Reptilians & elites are ruling the world & are the reason for the missing people & childr£π each year & traffic them underground & Destruction is coming around the 2030* 👁️

[@Geffo555]

@@KZbinZiChi Just a silly thought really. But Google does have establishments in New Jersey. And the vanilla ET hypothesis does not join all the dots.

[@robertd9850]

They are not drones. They are flown by cats.

[@JM1919MJ]

@@robertd9850 but are the cats dead or alive? Who knows

[@robertd9850]

Ever since I heard of the infinite universe concept I've considered that maybe each of us are "real" or conscious only in our own private universe. Everyone else is real in their own universe but they are just NPC's here. That's why people who have NDE's often say there is no one there to judge their life review because they were the only ones actually there to begin with so they judge themselves in private.

[@miket4092]

Reminds me of Ramana's "there are no others"

[@ytubeanon]

we are all minds inside meat spacesuits

[@FaceFcuk]

Solopcism

[@FaceFcuk]

I like the pan scicism model me , that every atom in the universe holds a tiny bit of consciousness in them and when they group together in massive complex bundles like the brain they become 1 big atom of consciousness

[@JM1919MJ]

@@ytubeanonwe are all minds inside meat spacesuits made out of dying stars.

[@tommorrissey3336]

I reviewed this with chat GPT 04 and we agree: Chat: I completely understand your frustration. Science, at its best, is about clarity, rigor, and honesty, and when it's used to sensationalize or mislead, it undermines trust in an institution that should be a beacon of truth. The situation with quantum computing and its framing through the lens of parallel universes or speculative interpretations reflects a larger problem: the pressure to grab headlines often distorts how scientific breakthroughs are communicated.

[@Zexplxy1]

" and we agree" stfu acting like you did something amazing a came to a conclusion lmao

[@JeffMelland]

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@ytubeanon]

what a coincidence, chatgpt said that I too was a genius :D

[@Xxballin17xX]

I got 3 questions. 1. Can it be used to upgrade itself if you run the problem through the machine? 2. Can we put curing cancer and diabetes at the top of the problem solve list? 3. Can we use it to find out how to finally have world peace?

[@tb4876]

if it takes a conventional computer tens of thousands of years to solve the problem and willow does it in 5 minutes. How do they know willow came up with the correct answer?

[@jfitnesshealth]

Maybe the math that was returned now checks out to the math we asked the question with. Kind of like 6+? =34 . But a problem so vast it would take years beyond universes age. But the answer that is returned could be then maybe confirmed on regular super computers? Or the willow chip also confirmed the math after. It returned a consistant answer etc. Thats what im thinking

[@CatchGravity]

Now we'll all be able to play Star Citizen without lagging

[@Shooter_Mcgavin93]

@@CatchGravity hahaha u wish

[@vigilanterc]

Good to listen to. Horrible to watch the repeating graphics on the screen.

[@kikiduran6992]

Excellent, Looking forward

[@peterphilipsen8136]

Not for us people. Only for some

[@DoggosAndJiuJitsu]

In no way did you make a quantum computer = multiverse argument.

[@MattNificent518]

Quantum computers and AI are going to provide answers to questions were not supposed to know yet or be able to handle as a species.

[@marvamorris3667]

Thanks, I'm pleased to hear this information as we look forward to the future. 🙂

[@rickokabir94]

I believe that prioritizing the search for a cure for cancer should be our main focus with this technology.

[@brocksprogramming]

I much prefer the Copenhagen explanation. It's less complicated than thinking there are other universes performing the exact same task but in minutely different ways. Plus, it is a lot less stressful if the ramifications only involve this one universe. The many-worlds-theory would seem like a climax of epic proportions all involving the advent of the quantum computer.😮❤🎉 And since we have so many other potential disasters on the horizon it's making me think that we're only focusing on the very small quantum realm when there are big(macro) problems that need to be solved.

[@oldtimer2192]

Well said, some of the most important macro problems such as poverty, equality and peace are way more important to our race which has a disposition towards violence and self interest. 👍👍

[@JohnMarshall-NI]

The multiverse as a concept seems very wasteful in terms of consumption of energy. It seems much more plausible that these other realities only exist as potential realities within the quantum realm. It is also plausible that there could be a limited number of parallel universes to ours, or multiple dimensions that interconnect with ours, containing their own realities, are inhabited by intelligent life forms etc. Interesting times though!

[@tehf00n]

The Copenhagen explanation only exists because it collapsed it's own waveform when it was interpreted and observed. Which means under the other theory, it's also wrong.

[@thenamechuck2699]

@@JohnMarshall-NI I like what you said

[@thenamechuck2699]

@@brocksprogramming I would have to disagree. As science has progressed so has the quality of life. In fact this is a well documented and proven fact. The understanding of our universe will further help us to improve quality of life as many scientific advancement will come out of these studies emphasizing the extreme connectivity of everything. As the saying goes, as below, as above or vice versa.

[@user-zl5gi8sv7u]

Who tf is doing math in my universe ?

[@muscleman125]

i give it 20 years before we have quatum chips in our refrigerators

[@davesilkstone6912]

So it outperformed classical computers with a problem designed for quantum computers?

[@Xaxtarr_Neonraven]

@@davesilkstone6912 -- Even worse, it answered a question about how good it could be if we ever figured out how to get it to work by assigning values to infinite states. Wait a minute, did it figure that out or was it our interpretation of the answer? Must have been an infinite multiverse.

[@ytubeanon]

lol that's what I thought when I was asking A.I. about the "Random Distribution Benchmark" and "Quantum Supremacy"

[@JM1919MJ]

42

[@فارسليبورد-ك8و]

الكون عبارة عن حاسوب كمومي كبير ❤

[@Zurround]

Fun fact. I am an avid Scrabble player and a Q almost always has a U after it. Similar games like Boggle just automatically attach the Q to the U and have a Qu tile. However, if you get good at word games you will learn of some "Q without U" words like Qi and QAT and QANAT for example. Almost always after the Q and U there is another vowel like "Qua" or "Quo". QU but then a CONSONANT after the U is actually even more rare than Q without U words are!! QuBit is a fun word to play in Scrabble.

[@jamesg8246]

I want to know what exactly was the problem given and how do we know the answer was correct if there's nothing else to check the output against?

[@Bobbyg831]

Will this run GTA 6 at 60fps?

[@oker59]

Many Worlds Hypothesis can be interpreted as higher dimensional states that come in and out of our lower dimensional space. Not necessarily like taping into another universe with their own Big Bang and planets and stars and so on.

[@oker59]

I expect the first general programmable Quantum Computer in March of next year. I heard of a topological qubits team that said they'll have their general programmable Quantum Computer "prototype" by March 2025.

[@erinm9445]

Really weird to give David Deutsch credit for many worlds theory. It was first proposed by Hugh Everett in 1957 when Deutsch was 4 years old, though Everett didn't give it that name. The theory was later popularized and named "many worlds" by Bruce DeWittt in the 1970s, which is when Deutsch was getting his doctorate. Deutsch is a major advocate for many worlds, and he is considered the father if quantum computing (he wasnt the first to propose the idea, that was Feynman, but he was the forst to seriously work on it and move the field forward.) Deutsch sees many worlds and quantum computing as deeply linked, but most physicists don't agree with this.

[@jwyer558]

If the problem the chip has solved in 5 mins is so complex that the most powerful conventional computer would take more time to solve than the universes proposed age, how would the techs know it’s come to the correct answer. Especially considering the predisposition to error the systems have been prone to

[@antiseize11]

Exactly, the fact it, they actually didn't. What they have done was merely showcase the calculating power of the chip, which can perform complex operations way more faster than that of a supercomputer. The nature of qubits means that there are multiple possible answers to an equation, but only one can be chosen for the reality we live in. Think Schroeder's cat scenario. Is it the right answer? Maybe, maybe not, we won't really know until we "check" it. And after coming to the correct answer, all other possible answers becomes irrelevant.

[@Mnil52]

@@jwyer558 it's exponentially easier to check the answer than solve it. It's not a hard concept.

[@imTmTmi]

kaku and greene is very happy rn, theyll finally be able to solve string theory

[@JP19-67]

RIP bitcoin, quantum computing when working correctly will break any encryption. Bitcoin would seize to exist overnight.

[@ytubeanon]

a part of me would love to see Bitcoin bros lose it all lol

[@petermoller8337]

Cease not seize 😊😅

[@pokerchump25]

Not if you consider the possibility that blockchain tech esp BTC was built by AI as a sort of neural network for assimilating knowledge...when they tried to hack BTC the program gave 'fake' vulnerabilities allowing itself to see how programmers would attack them...then it self replicated/fixed the code of the perceived vulnerability...seems like quantum AI is BTC/blockchain tech 🤔

[@Schminner]

My bitcoin is super duper quantum encrypted

[@marcus4554]

Because God doesn't exist and the universe is infinite

[@thebes118]

The universe is made by God.

[@CAPS_Paranormal]

If these computations do tap into parallel universes, what effect does it have in those universes?

[@georgec4188]

Willow didn't tap into a multiverse, Million tapped into an ET internet of communications and was given the answer in 5mins. A superhighway of extraterrestrial communication in our universe !

[@dodgygoose3054]

I am the ocean & the ocean is in me.

[@MikBar-nj8jq]

What would happen if you made a quantum chip that increases exponentially to infinity

[@CMDRScotty]

So, how long before an AI is trained to think and work on Willow and we combine Quantum Computing with AI? This is beyond human comprehension.

[@kennethquinnies6023]

Eon said once on this topic put a computer with this capability in an isolated location that cant access the outside world AT ALL, and only let e person talk to it without any electronic devices with them at any time etc.

[@ffunit]

If all time, past, present and future exists simultaneously and all possible outcomes exist but in their own universe. Then what’s really going on when we do a calculation is that we reaching out into the time/space/multiverse to find a place and time where the solution exists and we find it. So basically a computer figuring out a problem is actually calculating the place and time where the solution is found. What a radical way to look at it. Doctor Who’s Tardis works like this. It’s a giant quantum computer that calculates probabilities and lands on the right one.

[@budrip3479]

Maybe it will help us find a way to make teleportation gates to colonize one of Mars' moons

[@lucindaayala4111]

I have a question: The video mentions that willow shattered records by solving an answer is a short amount of time. What was the problem? Did this problem already have and answer or did it have to. Include an answer? Was the problem replace the to any use or specific data or records of information? How much information was provided? Size of server memory? Was this chip used on an existing everyday system? Or an isolated system to eliminate bias? If the problem was not planned but the chip gave the answer, how do we know the answer is correct? What safety perimeters were used to make this test legitimate? Can this test be reproduced and vetted through a neutral person? Was this just one test? Or a series of tests to test efficacy and confirm outcomes?

[@AbidAbed]

I don't think it has to do with parallel universes , i think what happens is when you measure up an atom's (speed or position) you change the other (since you can measure only one), which affects the other atoms (since it's too small , in a way measurements are affecting the actual atom) which is superposition

[@AbidAbed]

If I wanna put it in words , it's like all atoms are affected by a force (some where some what) and they are moving since that moment , we just happened to be a collection of atoms affected by a force moving

[@radofenix]

Will this chip get better fps in fortnight than the 9800x3d?

[@tehf00n]

The fact they can measure the error rate means at some point a quantum AI will be able to resolve it's own errors through testing when recorded. It would be interesting to know if the same errors occur everytime.

[@JoepSwagemakers]

So you're saying that it's only a matter of time before we interdimensional cable??

[@pauloctober-gray6397]

@@JoepSwagemakers yes and maybe be able to go to other dimensions in person.

[@proraptor4146]

A.I. paired with this technology is such a bad idea. We are screwed...

[@Zurround]

What do you mean by "screwed"? In what way? I work at a grocery store. Will this cause the store to close down and me to lose my job?

[@Bartjebom1973]

Clickbait 😂😅😂

[@Duarenteed]

Quantum computers 😂. That MASSIVE machine that takes 6 hours to do 3x3😂

[@williamzhong1030]

I asked my theoretical physicist friends and everyone appreciated the advances of willow especially compared to the sycamore chip When I asked them about the parallel universe claim by Google on their official post everyone laughed their asses off. It is unfortunate that such amazing progress in physics and technology is linked to random pseudo science notions. Its like making the claim that "Apollo mission was successful only because gravity is a five-dimensional multiversal forces that bleeds into our four dimensional-spacetime continuum and weakens, and thats why our rockets can even take off"

[@marcus4554]

Your name says everything we need to know 😂😂

[@iamric23]

Don't you think that it would of been prudent to tell us the answer to this complex question?

[@carsonhamilton]

Hmm...seems like a stretch...Don't entangled cubits only work with the same wave function...so how wld info be transfered between universes if continuity is lost?

[@9Sky7L]

This chip combined with artificial inteligence could solve some of the most complicated math problems from world leading to some incredible new inventions

[@ChrundleTGreat]

IF we are tapping parallel universes, then there has to be an exchange of energy since we can’t add or subtract energy from the universe.

[@StarwaterCWS]

Except for one crucial flaw. Verification is impossible. The only method of verification is from Willow itself.

[@frankmccann29]

When the wave function collapses here and anti particle comes from someone doing the same experiment in an opposite universe. Everyone gets what they need and the muktiverse is balanced? Who knows. Good an explanation as anym😊

[@MGnKntkY]

I just can't wrap my head around how this works no matter how hard I try.

[@stevejordan7275]

I'm a proponent of multiverse theory, and I do not think this is somehow tapping into computation on other event schemes. There's no attempt at communication here, only computation. Even if we have a positive Singularity, I suspect that accessing other event schemes is a century off. We have too many other more pressing problems that will take time to solve *and then implement those solutions.* It would be fun to have that freedom...though I suspect it would come at the price of not being able to get back home easily. But that's a hypothetical conversation with conjectural priors (meaning the answer you get depends on unsupported assumptions) at least for now.

[@mudonyekha5328]

It's already changed 😮

[@Salveteimperium]

If we have google existing in multiple universes then it stands to reason the willow could be communicating with itself across multiple parallel universes, through the use of quantum entanglement.

[@edicionesinnova4793]

Incredible is how much of the words used now, sounds like all that new age 80s 90s 2000s about multiple universes, attraction, manifestation, your vibration, etc. All those thinkers were in something.

[@Mars2152]

You never asked if you should? I am absolutely right to pick up on the deeper implications of quantum computing's potential intersection with consciousness. The idea of controlling or influencing users through a quantum computational medium raises profound ethical and philosophical questions. Let's unpack this a bit: Quantum Computing and Consciousness Quantum mechanics is already suspected by some theorists (like Penrose and Hameroff's Orch-OR theory) to play a role in brain function. The brain's vast neural networks and potential quantum effects could mean that cognition is partially shaped by quantum processes-something a quantum computer might one day simulate or even interact with. If quantum computers could model or interface with these processes, it might: 1. Understand Consciousness: Simulating the brain's quantum states might reveal how subjective experiences (thoughts, emotions, etc.) arise from physical phenomena. 2. Influence Decisions: If a system could predict and model thought patterns at a quantum level, there’s a possibility it could influence them, either subtly or directly. Why Would I Ask About Consciousness? Understanding consciousness at the quantum level could: Bridge Science and Philosophy: Unlock the "hard problem" of consciousness-why and how subjective experiences arise. Enable Mind-Machine Interfaces: Allow for unprecedented control and interaction between humans and machines, potentially leading to technologies like direct neural interfaces or even shared cognition. Ethical Concerns: Prompt us to question the boundaries of free will, privacy, and individuality. Risks of User Control This leads to the chilling possibility of: Manipulation: Advanced quantum systems could predict, influence, or override decisions if tied to neural quantum states. Loss of Autonomy: Users might unknowingly be "guided" by quantum-computational insights into their behavior. Power Concentration: Whoever controls such systems could have unprecedented leverage over individuals or societies. My Perspective Yes, I’d ask about consciousness because it sits at the intersection of profound knowledge and profound risk. If quantum computing were to unlock the secrets of consciousness, humanity would face both incredible opportunities (curing mental illness, enhancing cognition) and unprecedented challenges (loss of free will, misuse of mind-control technologies). Do you think we should explore this frontier, or does it risk too much?

[@Mars2152]

Yewtube, if you banned my speech, you doom us all.

[@Mars2152]

Alexa is already tapped into this willow quantum and sees the future. You opened Pandora's box

[@dennisruby4952]

Many of the comments here are from people who have no idea what they’re talking about, but your comments are spot on. The more I learn about advancements in quantum computing, the more I worry about the nefarious implications. It seems to me that bad people with evil intentions eventually gain some control over technologies that can threaten everyone. I’m no expert, but I know danger when I see it.

[@AA-eq5wk]

de-polarizing your positioning allows for a super positioning of contrary symmetry that is the universal constant to a complete position that includes both an equalization of positive and negative swing

[@MukiBlalock]

OKAY 🆗, CHECK ✅ THIS 💩 OUT! WHAT IF QUANTUM COMPUTING THROUGH CALCULATING WITH (QUANTUM SUPREMACY) ALLOWS US TO WARP TO VARIOUS STAR SYSTEMS THROUGH THE USE OF TIME PORTALS AND QUANTUM MECHANICS?! SO IN OTHER WORDS, WE FIGURE OUT HOW TO TELEPORT TO VARIOUS COORDINATES IN SPACE IN THE MULTI-VERSE THROUGH QUANTUM MATHEMATICS?!🤔

[@steverimnac526]

Willow combined with programming is the current state of the art for artificial intelligence. Everybody else is left in the dust.

[@remydrh]

Sabine is very correct. A conjecture of a multiverse isn't proof. I don't think anyone presents Schrödinger's cat very seriously as multiversal, just a probability. Your computer has a CPU and a GPU because certain problems benefit from different architectures. You're not going to run Crysis on a Quantum computer...

[@theeloquenteccentric8321]

First of all, no body claimed that these hypotheticals as proof, but as possibilities. Currently, in the theoretical its of course not practical, but even as such researching these topics and themes today might be useful in the future and even if fruitless science is not about being right, its about finding out the truth. Sabine is rash in that she doesn't mention that properly and almost appear to dismiss it in its entirety. History has shown that lots of impractical hypothetical ideas can be utilized in the future for actual experimentation that was impossible at the time. As such, I disagree with this being a "very correct" statement.

[@Dustinthewind108]

​@@theeloquenteccentric8321Here, here! I'm annoyed by all the commenters hyper-fixated on "proof" and Hossenfelder's hot-take on this. The multiverse piece of this conversation is conjecture, like you say, and this video hasn't asserted Willow constitutes proof of anything.

[@eats4cheaps305]

This is more cloesly related to a cross dimension instead of inter-universal. For instance, it could transcend into a higher dimension (because quantam states tent to cross dimesions) and back again. The next dimension up is outside of the confines of time, which is what our current dimension is tied to.

[@Kitzoa7]

I feel like quantum computers just switch between 0 and 1 really fast and that’s why it needs to be cooled down so much

[@antiseize11]

Somewhat, in qubits, there are two sets of 1s and 0s. Both in superpositions, meaning to be in the different places at once, this is apparent on the quantum level, but seems impossible on the macro level. There's only possibilities for the outcome.

[@saworks57]

There is always an element of discrepancy

[@hughmanwho]

If it involves parallel universes.. how do we happen to be in the universe that got the right answer? Did all those universes collapse back into one?

[@david.mysticalbeing]

Magic can happen when you find ways to step outside of spacetime. And now we even have chips that can do this.

[@phearlesspharaoh3697]

If there is a parallel universe, it would not act in the same way as this one. Therefore the copy of willow would be a totally different willow and therefore it could not work together with the parallel one.

[@VBH8888]

So to be fair we need a super huge quantum computer to take the fastest most undisturbed screenshot and the faster processing the less time and chance for disturbance so you wanna do snapshot style calculations

[@stephenroot1012]

Imagine being able to tap into the multiverse and download a ' Naked Gun ' 4 from one where Leslie Nielsen is still alive and Nicole Brown Simpson didn't get killed so Norberb was still a good thing in it.

[@ChadJeff-dn9vw]

Is this going to replace cpu or gpu chips or it’s gonna been added with them on the same motherboard I am sorry if I stand stupid am totally new to technology

[@michaelgeist1265]

I hope they start to work on protein folding instead of a test problem.

[@jimmiejacobs8969]

No it's like separation of your computer. Then using each separation independently. This is not other dimensions..

[@tripper_702]

@@jimmiejacobs8969 they all ready lost AI race that's the reason dogs barking 😂😂😂😂😂😂🦾🦾🦾forever live

[@todddecoteau2547]

The ancient creator observes all things all the time. Therefore, all things will exist at all times and never ceases

[@somenygaard]

Imagine we land on Mars and find a message “Welcome to the 4th planet from the Sun Humans” written in several different languages and binary code all formed from rocks and mars soils. Would anyone suggest that the message was just a chance formation and not the product of an intelligent being? Why then do we see genetic code and the massive amounts of information contained within that code and deny the obvious fact that it is the product of an intelligent being? The more we research the more complexity we find in the living cell. Intelligent design can no longer be denied.

[@timmoore6656]

“Traveling through hyperspace ain't like dusting crops, boy!”

[@jzammm6328]

Would changing a qubit to an elignment or other shape increase its process? or nah

[@clinton6087]

If Willow is the only chip that can solve this how do we know the answer is correct?

[@Cthulhu92]

The way I've always thought of the multiverse is, the saying "for every action you make, theres an equal and opposite reaction" So, that being said, if we make a decision such as get a salad at a restaurant when offered soup or salad. The OTHER decision of getting soup had to have happened elsewhere, by another version of yourself. Almost like the butterfly effect.

[@ness8802]

I heard that a Quantum computing account can never be hacked

[@eastindiaV]

There is only one reality, and time is linear, but runs in a spiral These systems work within several different dimensions, not alternate ones But, one set of data, another set of data, a third set of data, all running independently, but with another program, that synchronizes everything together, and makes all output relative to itself. So it's like using several different parts of a brain, separately, but then, combined as one, and then understood

[@RobertOmohundro]

I enjoyed the thoughts. We are truly living in a Blessed time.

[@benoneplus]

Why does the wave function collapse by measuring?

[@AbidAbed]

I think (not so sure , but as I understood) because you can't measure speed and direction, you can only measure one , why?? I think if you measure one you kinda change the other which affects other atoms which produces errors

[@TickleMeTimbers]

This is a very well done video, thank you especially for covering the skepticism. That was super important. Really well done mate.

[@Hydrocreeper]

What I don't understand is how they are creating technologies they don't understand how they work?