It is an irrefutable fact that scientists love working for zero pay and zero recognition. This unbiased scientific fact is brought to you by Nature. ✅
@ivanvuksanovic16642 жыл бұрын
You forgot to add "now pay us 60 dollars a month"
@WhirlwindHeatAndFlash2 жыл бұрын
The only people who enjoy working underpaid for zero recognition more is everyone in the healthcare system who isnt a doctor.
@uncreative542 жыл бұрын
They can provide you with multiple editorials written in the same format as and sandwiched between primary research articles in order to support their claim!!!
@korhanaydemir83662 жыл бұрын
Fact check ✔️ provided by Nature
@WhirlwindHeatAndFlash2 жыл бұрын
@@amandaforrester7636 Dear Amanda, recently it has come to our attention that you were posting youtube comments on a saturday. Naturally this begs the question - WHY THE F. ARE YOU NOT A WORK?
@j.s.r.11262 жыл бұрын
Sometimes I forget that all the characters are done by just one person.
@life.with.too.many.animals94112 жыл бұрын
IT'S ALL DONE BY JONATHAN....*nods*
@BombBunny2 жыл бұрын
Sometimes I'm not watching and I swear it's suddenly Patrick Warburton
@Waffles842 жыл бұрын
Me too
@Adamkilla90002 жыл бұрын
True that
@hotdog160002 жыл бұрын
What are you talking about? There's internal, cardiology, Mr. Kidneys, Johnathan... doctors just uhhhh all look the same after awhile
@violetskies142 жыл бұрын
Personally I think access to scientific discovery should never be restricted making what publishing companies do with scientific journals evil and them trying to further exploit researchers by having them review unpaid is disgusting.
@alexwirtz97802 жыл бұрын
I say either pay the reviewers (and don't force researchers to pay significant amounts of money to be published) or the content should be free for anyone to access. Under the current system, publishers get to have their cake, eat it, and then sell it to the masses once they are done digesting it. Meanwhile everone actually doing the work to further science and research get screwed over
@cassiolins12032 жыл бұрын
COMMA, DO YOU EVEN?!
@vidal97472 жыл бұрын
@@alexwirtz9780 They should also pay the researchers. You are literally paying to give away your intellectual property...
@violetskies142 жыл бұрын
@@cassiolins1203 you do see the irony of you criticising my grammar using that sentence, right? To be clear, I can use commas, but when I'm tired I forget/don't care enough to use them. Honestly, I don't think it really matters on KZbin, no one is doing their best writing in the comment section.
@cassiolins12032 жыл бұрын
@@violetskies14 Irony indeed. But it's nice to know you can write properly when you want to
@WordyGirl902 жыл бұрын
I’m too much of an academic. My thoughts: 1) “That’s not quite accurate, you can put your reviewer status on your CV!” 2) “No, Science won’t know, they’re a competing journal!” 😆
@owains832 жыл бұрын
Came looking for point 2!
@hannahp08062 жыл бұрын
And I was here looking for point 1...
@Thurgoodstubbs.2 жыл бұрын
lmbo nah I thought the EXACT same things.
@Jasmixd2 жыл бұрын
Couldn't you just put it in as "been selected as a reviewer"? It's not like that's untrue, whether you accepted or not.
@magnolia86262 жыл бұрын
Lolll
@waterunderthebridge79502 жыл бұрын
The scientific community should totally band together and organize a non-profit, high-impact journal that invests all its earnings back into science but I guess that’s too utopian to be ever put into reality
@ItsAsparageese2 жыл бұрын
I've wondered for years why this isn't a thing. It would be pretty trivial to make it at least remunerative enough to fund web hosting and marketing costs, through either a super affordable subscription program or donations or both, without having to introduce ads or other morally gray strategies. And there could still be reasonable (but below market average) costs for various kinds of licensing, which could in turn fund research, and if it operated as a nonprofit it could also be a vehicle for grants. If I didn't already have such a long list of ideas I have to prioritize more highly, I'd try to make this a thing. I really hope someone does
@BlueGoblin12 жыл бұрын
I mean how about operating purely on donation and volunteer work while offering all the knowledge to the public for free.
@Astor_V2 жыл бұрын
I think a few have tried. One problem is how to start: to be high-impact, you need to accept only the best of the best. So you need the best of the best to want to publish in your journal. But they want to be published in a high-impact journal, which you are not yet. So you start to accept lower impact paper to get at least known and publish a bit. But then your impact factor reflect that. And so you failed to make a high impact journal. For this to work, you need many high profile researchers/labs to get behind you and publish only/mostly in your journal. And this is not easy.
@olenickel60132 жыл бұрын
Public, state-funded journals with open access should be a thing.
@waterunderthebridge79502 жыл бұрын
It’s just a matter of Nash equilibrium where journals utilize artificial competition for journal space to pit scientists against each other to distract them from any significant movements to unite against the greedy journals instead. If a big enough number of high-impact scientists/labs get behind the idea, they could start depending on each other to keep the impact of the journal high and competitive, so that more scientists can get behind this and further reduce overall risk. However the first step to realize this is always the hardest and most risky
@donttouchthisatall2 жыл бұрын
Worst part is, that there will always be another reviewer who is willing to do this. This is one of the reasons you have ZERO leverage as a PhD student. If you don't wanna work 80h weeks w/o a weekend in monts, step aside - there are plenty of others ready to suffer.
@Ciasteczkowy2 жыл бұрын
so let them suffer. Why does it boder you? Unless you would like to do this for living I don't uderstand your point
@amoral_minority2 жыл бұрын
@@Ciasteczkowy exactly. Can someone pls explain this?
@wraitholme2 жыл бұрын
@@Ciasteczkowy Why does the suffering of others bother me? Really? Have you considered being tested for ASPD?
@satanic_rosa2 жыл бұрын
@@Ciasteczkowy The point is that this harmful practice is only alive because there are so many people willing to donate their labor instead of selling it at an appropriate market price.
@The_Riot2 жыл бұрын
@@wraitholme In this age of information we are constantly bombarded with things trying to grab our attention, trying to make us click, trying to make us care. After years of headlines, mass shootings, hyperbolic entertainment, morbid curiosity, and blood-sport politics permeating the fabrics of society can you really blame people for being desensitized and not care? There are at least 30 other issues I can think of not least of which is the video I just watched of bodies being thrown into a mass grave for burial in Ukraine to care about how some schmucks don’t know how to say no and work themselves to death. Diagnose me with ASPD, “doctor.” 🙄
@Urbanity_Kludge2 жыл бұрын
All it would take is 100 reviewers for Nature to see this and quit. Of course, since the reviewers are not listed anywhere, how do we know they are real?
@bryansanchez81582 жыл бұрын
"or what? You won't pay me?" That part was so good
@8584zender Жыл бұрын
Or the editor might remember your name the next time you submit to them and flat reject.
@GoldenPantaloons2 жыл бұрын
I really wish more researchers would give big publishing companies the middle finger. It's completely unacceptable in the digital age how scientific knowledge is meted out by miserly gatekeepers.
@waterunderthebridge79502 жыл бұрын
Sometimes I just wonder where all the money that journals make go to when they pay neither readers, reviewers, submitters nor really printing (as most is electronic these days) besides their own private coffers
@KleRoi2 жыл бұрын
Probably to a few publishing houses' CEOs that are keeping in the dark
@mokko7592 жыл бұрын
You already have the answer, you said it yourself: their own private coffers. Besides maintaining the servers that hold all the information and other such basic operations costs, it's just pure, corporate greed.
@lainet33792 жыл бұрын
*their own private coffers* Where else would it go?
@helena89992 жыл бұрын
My mom’s an editor for a scientific journal, and she doesn’t see much money either. She’d change jobs, but she does genuinely like reading and helping along papers. Does make you wonder where the money goes.
@haleymist092 жыл бұрын
Golfing
@paigeroberts962 жыл бұрын
I am currently arguing with the higher-ups at my "prestige" cancer research institute after they decided that research assistants actually don't need desks after all and are moving us all into the lab full time. The exploitation in academia is real🙂
@mz5552 жыл бұрын
I ask the gov for funding to do research, ask the public to volunteer as participants, use university time to write up the paper, submit to for peer review (done for free by anonymous colleagues), then the journal charges me to publish my work, or others to look at it (including the gov and the people involved in it...). the publishing process. (we also don't get anything in return for publishing, other than a line on our cv)
@acastanza2 жыл бұрын
PLoS actually publicly discloses reviewer activity, not which particular paper you've reviewed (unless you consent), but if you've reviewed a paper for PLoS in, say, 2019, they'll (optionally) link "Review activity for PLoS, 2019" to your ORCID so at least you can put it on your CV. It's not much but it's not nothing. I don't know how many other journals do similar.
@artemisiaabsinthium17942 жыл бұрын
Thank you for acknowledging that it's the libraries that usually pay for journal subscriptions. It's a small detail, but libraries with often tight budgets have to be the meat in the sandwich between users (who still need access to journals) and publishers (with their increasing prices or heavier restrictions). It's not a fun time.
@achyutkanungo.982 жыл бұрын
I seriously feel the level of satisfaction that the man felt. I felt pathetic when I couldn't access articles for my work due to the costs. Screw you, Top Journals.
@anthonyhadsell2673 Жыл бұрын
Have you tried scihub? It’s like the Pirate Bay for academia over a hundred million freely accessible published research articles
@milossimicsimo Жыл бұрын
This is conversation that goes in my head, every time I got an mail to review something for some journal :D. Especially for ones with high IF. I remember when I was still doing my PhD, the journal rejected my paper with words 'no evidence', it didn't even went to reviewers. BUT, at the same time, the same journal have called me to review something 'as an expert in the field'. My paper was in computer science area, and there were a hard math proofs for everything I stated, but hey, no evidence :D, BUT I'm expert in the field at the same time :D. Funny.
@MK-xs1qv2 жыл бұрын
I want to personally send all of these ~prestige~ journals this video
@marwanabdullmaged11482 жыл бұрын
I truly feel you doc. That argument wasn't just humor. Humor here is a means to express your opinion safely.
@Unc3rtaintyPrinciple2 жыл бұрын
this is so accurate it's painful. Every time I was a reviewer, they say it's a giant honour, and somehow you do believe that, but then researchers are not allowed to know who reviewed their paper, and i'm not allowed to say what i reviewed. so it's a giant honour that involves a lot of work that no one will ever know you ever did.
@thejschro2 жыл бұрын
This hits on so many levels. A huge frustration is when I am peer reviewing and checking a couple references, but I can’t get into because I don’t have access without paying! I’m the one volunteering my time here. Although it would be great to at least receive a nominal fee to review a manuscript (like submitting board test questions), I do like doing it IF it is a cool topic of personal interest because it forces me to read, and allows me to ask the questions that I usually do anyways when I read. It would be nice to have at least an acknowledgement when the paper is published. I don’t understand why that isn’t the case.
@PWLfr2 жыл бұрын
Yeah, "reviewed by Dr. whatever" is an important mention, some reviewers can be trusted, and it could illustrate potential conflict of interests
@lejeilat2002 жыл бұрын
So the world needs to recognize you, Dr G, alongside some other rising clinician comic-critics, in at least two ways: 1- Something like a new category in The Oscars. 2- With a governing body in the healthcare system to start listening to y'all in their process of improving the system, because you very often skillfully present excellent arguments to address what frustrates us in the system.
@gwouru2 жыл бұрын
The award for streamers/youtubers or things like that, is the streamies... the oscars are for movies, emmies are for television... Hugo is for written work... So... unless they're making feature length movies released in theaters, they don't qualify for the oscars.
@OneMondBand2 жыл бұрын
That was a very cathartic experience. Thank you for that!
@sally87082 жыл бұрын
I love these so much!! More on insurance companies practicing without a medical license, please!!
@Yupppi Жыл бұрын
It was pretty cool to hear people like Dr. Pak not release his most recent study in journals but rather put it out there for free and let people openly comment and criticize it, essentially doing possibly better job than peer reviews would have (you know how you might get asked to peer review something you don't even understand). Maybe things are slowly changing.
@snehasowmy72262 жыл бұрын
The chaotic cackle is what I’m here for. Realizing they have unlimited power but still can’t really help it if you say no
@brendaburrup62932 жыл бұрын
"Tristopher" 🤣🤣🤣
@Lisa4U7Aaron_Modahl2 жыл бұрын
Brilliant show. Thank you.🌹
@boringtobe22 жыл бұрын
Oh my god this hits so hard across all academia and I love it! (Coming from being a chronically ill social science major with friends that are pre-health majors)
@BaronVonFisticuffs2 жыл бұрын
I would love to hear that laugh edited into a version of Thriller. That would be amazing.
@hithasrivatsan39402 жыл бұрын
Incredible work! I love to sit back and watch you keep calling out hypocrisy, and then I share your work with others (while feeling morally superior and smug) and then I continue to dance to the system's tune.
@richardsnell45362 жыл бұрын
I'm so much into the characters . I need a Jonathan of my own😂
@AldO-HPB2 жыл бұрын
.. Dr. G and our scientific multiverse of madness. Omniscient and omnipresent. Able to manifest the million faces and realities of medicine and scientific research. Has so many voices and personalities it is almost impossible to know who has been throwing the punches and delivering uppercuts. 👊👊👊 Dr. G, Jonathan, et al., it appears all of you are well appreciated. 🙌
@jamievenezia77602 жыл бұрын
This video deserves way more likes because it’s so painfully accurate and shows how smart doctors actually are,
@oseyiomoi92762 жыл бұрын
The misery that is academia. This is an amazing skit!
@Adamkilla90002 жыл бұрын
The names are the funniest part. TRISTOPHER 🤣
@ItsAsparageese2 жыл бұрын
Thanks for having the satisfying conversation for us to all live vicariously through lol
@dominic50652 жыл бұрын
Im an ID Doc by day, a paper i wrote was returned today and as you predicted reviewer 2 unleashed their wrath. Excellent video hah
@rokaram86192 жыл бұрын
Mine too he was not under our scoop ...
@NinaWashington Жыл бұрын
The hard swallow and pause of realization sends me every time! 😂😂😂
@bullyguy97102 жыл бұрын
You are so good. Please do more. We love it
@thepuzzlax6272 жыл бұрын
That evil cackle at the end GOT me.
@jamesscott28942 жыл бұрын
I saw the title and thought Psychology or one of the other characters would be eating lunch in the park and reviewing the trees and flowers and what not, maybe after a scathing review of wildflower induced allergies we hear about how the duck bros are cool lol
@celesteclausen7598 Жыл бұрын
After that evil laugh I fully expected "Thriller" to start playing.
@kunjupulla2 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much for calling out on such stupid practices in the least offensive way 😊. That's how, a comedian can make changes in the rules. Support from India ❤️💜.
@kineticmike53612 жыл бұрын
This HAS to change someday. It's honestly crazy that scientists get zero compensation for doing all the work. If the journal was non-profit, that would be a different story. How do we change this?? Maybe legislation from government?
@InTrancedState2 жыл бұрын
That's the only way I see it happening. It's making a few people way too much money for it to ever change naturally or through competition at this point. You have to treat it like regulating any other billion dollar company.
@jayl91102 жыл бұрын
I just, I'm perhaps more torn on this than I should be. I know two things for certain: 1. Reviewers *absolutely* deserve to be compensated for the work that they do. It's as necessary to scientific advancement as is research and it is by all accounts very time consuming work. 2. Research is heavily tainted by corporate or industry body sponsorship as it is. Given that journals like Nature are for-profit endeavours run by profit seeking publishers, it's hard for me to trust that they wouldn't invite or accept sponsorship of reviewers rather than slightly reducing their profit margin. Maybe I'm too jaded by 21st century capitalism but I do worry that corporate bias would be introduced (and part of me worries that'd be by design)
@justsomenobody8892 жыл бұрын
I think if enough high-profile researchers around the world put their heads together on this issue they could start a movement. But first they'd have to get their heads out of their asses..
@nj.73252 жыл бұрын
@@jayl9110 I recognise I don't know enough about this but how do they find reviewers anyway? It's personal contacts I think. If the selection criteria is treated like any other job's, and you're paid for performing the review as per your level of qualification rather than the content or final quality of it then that should involve a lot less bias? I think that allowing reviewers to be paid has the potential to introduce bias and a lot of potential to reduce the heavy industry body bias already present. Plus free labour for public benefit (where it's not actually volunteering) really shouldn't be allowed to be a thing from a humanitarian standpoint.
@kineticmike53612 жыл бұрын
@@jayl9110 Paying the reviewers might help other aspects of the publishing process which can help compensate for this bias. For example, scientists will be more willing to spend significant amounts of time reviewing the research, which would improve the quality of the literature review (as long as we don't make a system which incentivises quick review times). Legislation might be able to prevent sponsorship of specific reviewers
@ceciliavernes90972 жыл бұрын
Thank you for mentioning the libraries and the huge subscription costs.
@moonlightwolf2 жыл бұрын
Reminds me so much of when my undergraduate thesis advisor was trying to explain the process of getting my results published
@InfinityFishing2 жыл бұрын
That evil laugh in the end so well deserved ahaha
@ippolitius2 жыл бұрын
When I started college to read a journal you just had to go get it off the shelf. Then they went digital had to read them on the library computer, then they were available via the college intranet by loging into the library, and by the time I left they were only available to studebts studying specific majors. All in a short 5 year sint. All due to increases in licenses , went from buying a few copies to charging exorbitant amounts for a subscription.
@sandypiper94542 жыл бұрын
So true. Publishers have become monopolies that are out of control with their fees.
@drhandle44982 жыл бұрын
That's creepy; I had that exact conversation with a publisher for the first time 20 years ago, after I'd done the first couple of papers as an early career researcher who didn't know any better... (it was via email and I didn't get to do an evil laugh, but the gist was the same). When journals stop shameless profiteering and make their articles available for a less extortionate price, I will consider being a referee. Until then, I just send 'em my pay scale.
@027atulyakumar22 жыл бұрын
I asked the same question when i learned how nature works . Thank god in India our ICMR nd other institutions are owned by the govt. nd they pay everyone , even the med students and don’t even charge it’s readers.
@waydet69502 жыл бұрын
I would have loved to see the real conversation that sparked this video. Amazing
@ilkaysanl89072 жыл бұрын
You’ve made me laugh so bad with that laugh 🤣🤣🤣🤣
@frankzaffuto36702 жыл бұрын
"Then what, you won't pay me?" *Laughs in 'you have no power here'*
@atanu_d_roy2 жыл бұрын
Origin of Joker.
@dgcostarica12 жыл бұрын
This experience was enhanced by the enormous P&G ad that hovered below the video screen 😂😂😂
@Dr.E7HER2 жыл бұрын
There’s no way they don’t punish you for declining them though. Good luck getting published in Nature after turning down their offer of nothing
@petrabanjarnahor2292 жыл бұрын
Well what if there's another publisher that pay the reviewer
@er00ic2 жыл бұрын
@@petrabanjarnahor229 There isn't any publisher that pays reviewers.
@Nightraven2611 ай бұрын
Publishing is overrated imho
@ShawnGoodmanJazz2 жыл бұрын
You forgot the most important honor… another line on your CV!
@justsomenobody8892 жыл бұрын
Don't forget, they also get advertising revenue from pharmaceutical companies. No conflicts of interest there!
@jamppa350 Жыл бұрын
Glad that nowadays there are some free platforms that shares articles on every science domain(illegaly tho). God bless the internet!
@adrianmole902 жыл бұрын
I can't decide whether I'd like to pull a Mallory Weiss syndrome or laugh out loud. Well done Sir!
@muhsalihu2 жыл бұрын
Please, laugh out loud because the A&E is filled up and we don't want you to go there.🤣🤣🤣
@Griever782 жыл бұрын
I love Tristopher! And I totally got that that laugh was real. Haha!
@kathrynbiglin31242 жыл бұрын
I read the title Nature as in Mother Nature and thought, "ya damn straight!". Then I watched and also thought "ya damn straight!".
@resourceress72 жыл бұрын
Me, too. I have several chronic illnesses and daily chronic pain so my almost daily review of Nature is "1 star, would not recommend. Now will someone please help upload my consciousness to a robot instead?" Edit: There's a much more concise version of that review, but this is a family channel so I'll censor it :)
@totallycrazystudios18012 жыл бұрын
"Like an evil cartoon villain" Lol!🤣
@bharathsharma62802 жыл бұрын
Haha this feels like telemarketing 101.
@motleybreuu2 жыл бұрын
As a medical student with lots of unanswered questions that seem one click away but are actually buried beneath a bazillion unaffordable dollars, thank you for the logic.
@Durga-ma2 жыл бұрын
Bravo 🙌, for highlighting the very convoluted world of Medical research publishing
@Blyght2 жыл бұрын
You said 'taint' and it was the best thing ever. 🤣
@TheBestTuber3962 жыл бұрын
Let me finish that sentence. If you don’t do this then I will only send your submissions to bad reviewers and give you bad letters if your university asks me when you come up for tenure, or I’ll talk badly about your research and make it harder for you to get a job
@muhsalihu2 жыл бұрын
Fortunately for him, he has his clinical job to occupy him.
@PWLfr2 жыл бұрын
yeah, I'm not sure he keeps his clinical job if he puts out "shitty" research (at least as reviewed)
@Nightraven2611 ай бұрын
Luckily, depending on where you work, you can have a clinical job without doing any research papers 🤷♂️
@tammyt.98522 жыл бұрын
The maniacal laugh at the end? Chef's 💋
@sjey63962 жыл бұрын
"I respectfully decline" is one of my favorite ways to tell people to f*** off
@MySaucyNuggets Жыл бұрын
It’s simple, I see video. I click. Lol thanks for the great content ☺️
@sowmyasrirama69812 жыл бұрын
It's just so... accurate. Sometimes I feel , that's the reason for increased predatory journals ...
@haleymist092 жыл бұрын
"Justopher" I lost it! 😂😂😂😂
@juliabinford65002 жыл бұрын
I live for the names you come up with. Does Tristopher know Jimothy by any chance?
@aponderer322 жыл бұрын
This is brilliant! Thank you Dr. Galucomflecken pointing to major problems in medicine and science while maintaining a light-hearted, humorous attitude. Way to go!
@letsplaysvonaja1714 Жыл бұрын
The laughing at the end reminds me of "Heaven? Whatever made you think this is Heaven? This *is* the other place!"
@pouriya85872 жыл бұрын
Thanks for bringing this to light.
@farshaddehqani35022 жыл бұрын
I loveeee you Dr G for bringing the truth to light!
@esabris21512 жыл бұрын
"Science will know!" Best line ever.
@kayura772 жыл бұрын
"Well, when you put it _that_ way..." 🤣
@mo-hammadabunaser13672 жыл бұрын
The GlaucomLaugh is iconic
@carrierutherford59462 жыл бұрын
If one does not set one's own value, the world will certainly not raise it. An Artist learns this quickly!
@toottoot242 жыл бұрын
As a PhD student, this hits home. I’m the sucker that willingly spends hours doing this for low tier journals (that I’ve published in) just to do it
@ethanstump2 жыл бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/b3XImGqMp9V7mK8
@TomJones-wi4nh2 жыл бұрын
Genuinely curious - Do you do it for Science!, recognition or because everyone else does it? Is saying No ever an option?
@toottoot242 жыл бұрын
@@TomJones-wi4nh I do it because it's been the standard format for a long time. And as a student, I feel obligated to contribute to my field. Also, I've never said no. But I'm sure you can.
@smoothsoulbrotha2 жыл бұрын
😂😂😂 This is exactly what I was explaining to a friend recently.
@FacundoMD2 жыл бұрын
You are the most famous doctor on KZbin !!!!! OR at least the best and funniest I don't care what anyone says !!!!! You are brilliant. STAY SAFE !!!!!!
@QelDoQ2 жыл бұрын
On point! But I particularly love your evil villain laugh!
@avamckinney652111 ай бұрын
the evil laughter had me rolling 😂😂
@monte3142 жыл бұрын
Yep. I got a paper in the hopper right now... thankless, but somebody's got to do it...
@Leahalph2 жыл бұрын
THANK YOU FOR MAKING THIS!!!! Reviewers.... let's get together and end this unethical practice where journals profit off us...
@won20529jun2 жыл бұрын
This is actually such an important issue. Thanks for bringing more attention to it!!
@globalcitizenn2 жыл бұрын
I expected “Thriller” to start after that laugh
@Red-wc1br2 жыл бұрын
I like how the little guy actually beat the big guy in this one
@thesheel1002 жыл бұрын
This Doc is a superstar.
@gilangignasraharjo61382 жыл бұрын
That is actually a brilliant idea... let's start doin that people!
@socceratesmedicine2 жыл бұрын
The heart of evidence based medicine depends on research. This is a great video that sheds light on this complex process. Job well done
@lenaeospeixinhos2 жыл бұрын
I felt this in my bones (as a scientist, not as someone who has ever or will ever be asked to be a reviewer, introduce hysterical laughter)
@olidouze80222 жыл бұрын
I love that you talk a lot about that topic. Needs more awareness!
@seraph57652 жыл бұрын
Nature and the CDC should team up in one of these. They'd be like the Avengers but for incompetence.
@videt74592 жыл бұрын
Dermatology could've made an appearance to treat that savage burn.