Have you ever seen an atom?

[@user-wh9mr9tb7q]

Thought this was some kind of bleeding edge nano tech, then realized this video was posted 8 years ago. mad respect to all the scientists out there

[@GGsquared]

@Hidden Aspects “Source(s): Dude trust me”

[@SpikeyBagel]

@@GGsquared Source(s): bro you gotta believe me

[@Pradapussy]

@Hidden Aspects have you seen the videos inside of your body or the food you eat 🤯🤯crazy molecular structures bro

[@RocketTurret]

@Hidden Aspects bro literally everything to ever exist is made of crazy nano-particles and structures.

[@SpikeyBagel]

@@Pradapussy like bro, why are there rectangles in my onion? that must be the work of the government. nature doesn't make rectangles, bro.

[@314159265352]

Yes. When trillions of them get together.

[@ahuman4]

abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz

[@votesus9819]

Lmao

[@cooIcat6778]

@@ahuman4 u said it 1 hour after he posted the comment, it's not the time to say underrated

[@ahuman4]

@@cooIcat6778 ?

[@cooIcat6778]

@@ahuman4 ur previous comment b4 u edited was "underrated comment"

[@galadirk7843]

My atoms watching this: "Hey there bros"

[@paramueswaran8015]

Underrated

[@jemonsue1608]

My atoms be educated.

[@barium_67]

@@paramueswaran8015 it's been only 3 days and you're like "uNdErAtEd" wait for a while breh

[@paramueswaran8015]

@@barium_67 wAiTiNg

[@barium_67]

@@paramueswaran8015 🤬

[@louiswhite6749]

I’m watching this 8 years later and imagining how good microscopes are now

[@carle0nee.430]

Hi bro :)

[@kirubel8572]

Hi man

[@frankiegamingyt7657]

🤣

[@aynain1810]

I'm here too

[@carlosdimartino5842]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/mn6viICNebiiiKc

[@stockwatsonnu8518]

“Have you ever seen an atom?” Yes, I haven’t

[@DalekCraft]

Somehow, this makes sense.

[@duwiii420]

....i don't know what to say.

[@lukaposeidon8490]

Yesn't

[@unwaving332]

My brain is melting

[@Gldtr39]

Yes I’ve met Adam

[@hun450]

"Have you ever seen an atom?" No, but I have drawn them..

[@musicalhamsa5892]

For science class, i can guess.

[@infinityxtanishq8712]

No , you drew an older theoretical model of the atom , not the atom itself ........

[@Myday_145]

No you idiots he means sense everything is made out of atoms,including things you write then yeah he has drawn atoms.He’s drawn atoms by drawing pictures

[@ananttripathi4264]

Just like gods lol

[@AdrianRO1918]

@@Myday_145 no shit sherlock

[@manababa1313]

“Have you seen an atom?” I don’t know maybe I’m made of them.

[@thetoastcart9360]

Fax be seeing em everyday

[@waitwhatihavefriends2181]

@@thetoastcart9360 yeah ikr

[@ashleywilliams4665]

I read the title and said “yes, I’m constantly looking at them… at all times”

[@simplybxellax]

We are made of atoms.

[@whoami8247]

@@thetoastcart9360 you are seeing a massive group of atom and not the atom itself

[@alexpetrov8871]

These tiny dots - atoms, they are actually made of emptiness. What you see as a dot - is an area where electrons orbit over nucleus, where nucleus in turn is several hundred times smaller than the maximum orbit. There is no "matter" at all - only energy fields.

[@sunimarai8380]

Can u explain it

[@619kane]

GOD PARTICAL

[@scruffypupper]

But if enough of the atoms hang out together they make up some kind of matter (onion) right? So if the atoms are empty and the emptiness contained by an energy field how can the onion exist so that we see it? Are we/everything just an energy field the brain interprets as a thing (person/onion) based on how the brain is programmed to perceive energy?

[@nataliatals7165]

*facepalm*

[@madiebon_5440]

@@nataliatals7165 Don’t let laymen near the electron microscope

[@CanadianPrepper]

Wait until the flat earthers get bored and start a new "Atoms dont exist" campaign...

[@masterbetty3020]

@@lukewave7680 You heard correct!

[@JS-qg1ie]

What’s the difference between a knife and a flat earther? A knife has a point.

[@osslayer8976]

James Stimpson oof flat earthers

[@Smullet90]

@@JS-qg1ie That's *A* difference not *THE* difference.

[@JS-qg1ie]

Smullet90 First time hearing a joke?

[@elijahhouahri]

Atom one: I lost an electron. Atom 2: are u sure? Atom one: I'm positive

[@lunkel8108]

good one

[@officermeowmeowfuzzyface4408]

very old joke

[@patrickmacready1779]

Looool

[@GabrielTobing]

XD XD XD XD XD XD I get it, sadly. To much chemistry for me.

[@harukakotoura1489]

Elijah and daddy lmfao

[@MentalParadox]

"So it's all pixels"? Agent Smith: "Always has been."

[@GfaiderKseii]

*shoot*

[@kevindavis7603]

Matrix confirmed...

[@RSReddit1]

@@kevindavis7603 😳😳🧐🧐😮😮😭☠️

[@jamesgoldring1052]

Yeah, these discoveries scare me, pandoras box

[@wannabekid3256]

Lol

[@GameUnCrafter]

As a chemist, we actually did a lab where we could see literal atoms. It's a core memory of mine and I remember it like yesterday.

[@yourlocalsister5788]

Woah how did the atoms look like?

[@juicerak7269]

Atom is so infinitely small that nobody has seen a clear actual atom. Even the video is 3d representation, there's no way what you saw are atoms

[@r3b3lvegan89]

That’s not true at all. There’s a video showing gold atoms and it’s very real.

[@BDizzleMySchnizzle]

​@@r3b3lvegan89no, there isn't.

[@BDizzleMySchnizzle]

If you're a chemist then you know you didn't see an atom. Nobody has. Come on, dude.

[@djmocok]

Atom, you see one, you've seen it all

[@Krazycutiegurlxxx]

There's a different atom for each element. Not to mention isotopes. So..... i'd disagree.....unless you were referring to how WE can see them. But even then, i don't know if we can perhaps see a difference in sizes of atoms or something.

[@kujo62]

Way to ruin the joke by bringing in facts.

[@Krazycutiegurlxxx]

ku62jo62 ...Jokes are supposed to be funny. I saw no joke.

[@kujo62]

i did. therefore, it is a joke. and once again, you're ruining everything.

[@Krazycutiegurlxxx]

ku62jo62 You should see a doctor. Your sense of humor seems to be delirious. As a professional tomfoolerist with a PhD. in tomfoolery, i suggest 30 minutes of Monty Python. Inform me of a recommended way to chop down the largest tree in a forest for your checkup.

[@Pettan_Supremacy]

It's been 8 years i think the technology would've grown even better

[@champadevi2581]

Yes that's what I thought. Gotta wait until youtube recommends something new on this topic.

[@backyardtortoise.]

@@champadevi2581 instead of waiting, why don't you just search it up.

[@champadevi2581]

@@backyardtortoise. There's no fun in that. Why look for it when you can wait for 5 more years and happen to stumble upon it and see how advanced we've become. Ecstasy.

[@Nihilius87]

@@champadevi2581 😂

[@secretc.5214]

@@champadevi2581 ez

[@kartikeymehrotra8589]

This was 8 years ago, damn, I thought I'm watching some cutting edge engineering in play

[@lumenpraetorius4592]

No.

[@KaarthiBlaze]

Yea... imagine how much tech have progressed now

[@unskadunsk]

Still pretty advanced

[@indigoisasleep8552]

Yeah, you are

[@aiduck8307]

@@KaarthiBlaze yeah like Facebook is no longer is used and TikTok being a mental asylum. 😂

[@icebluscorpion]

Seeing the matrix at it finest structure with such fine detail gives my a very deeply sense of satisfaction and admiration for this universe that we live in

[@manababa1313]

Mad respect for the scientists thanks for answering my question that I didn’t have.

[@essereferrari16]

Why you gotta be mad bro

[@manababa1313]

@@essereferrari16 I’m not

[@emycharaa]

@@manababa1313 Don't listen to them, I don't understand why they're so mad lmao

[@naturalcombat7495]

@@emycharaa i cant even understand whether you’re joking or not

[@adrianapollyon5087]

No one has ever seen an atom. Or a living virus. Or photons. All theoretical

[@dopedrums]

"have you ever seen an atom?" Proceeds to show onion hieroglyphs

[@ERWlN_SMITH]

😂😂😂

[@ryanmotmaen6311]

Actually those are onion's cells

[@Seffek]

@@ryanmotmaen6311 Thanks for sharing that information, I did not know this until now.

[@ERWlN_SMITH]

@@ryanmotmaen6311 damn bro really? I never knew 🤯

[@shadowwolf5128]

@@ERWlN_SMITH seeing your profile ye i would say you didn't know

[@paulanocu3711]

"Have you ever seen an atom?" Shows onion

[@Thecrusader6169]

Fun fact: onion is an atom Just kidding 😂

[@onlyraff7768]

@@Thecrusader6169 no but it is fr 😂

[@Bakibenz96]

It's an easter egg for those who know the deep lore :D Bohr's early atom model is frequently compared to an onion.

[@0djunder0]

@@Thecrusader6169 well, yes, is made of *atoms*

[@Thecrusader6169]

@@0djunder0 that's what I said

[@hamster2845]

Trying to view an atom using visible light is like shooting cannonballs off a brick wall to determine its texture.

[@TRVPHAUS]

that doesn't make any sense.

[@Shadydoesit]

​@@TRVPHAUSactually it makes complete sense, because to measure something on such a small scale would change its position

[@fxeditors]

Uncertainty principle

[@bookofsounds014]

so this suggests the findings only demonstrate light behavior?

[@scottmeager5919]

There is literally more space in a "solid" object than there is not.

[@pattyryopotybuttongamer3063]

quick romhack troubleshooting guide -have you checked that the files are in the correct folders? -are they named correctly? -have you verified the romhack you are trying to use is for the update version of your game, whatever update that is? -have you verified that you are using the right versions of any plugins you are trying to use? -have you verified that no files are interacting with other cheat plugins you may be using? -have you tried disabling any plugins you may be using? -have you checked that the base game runs without problem? -have you tried re-downloading the relevant files and replacing them on the sd in case they were a bad download or a bad copy?

[@bbesung6796]

@@pattyryopotybuttongamer3063 yes

[@howiestillgamez5326]

@@pattyryopotybuttongamer3063 have you fucking checked what you are replying to

[@frankforte8078]

@@howiestillgamez5326 yes

[@BillAnt]

@@howiestillgamez5326 - Copy and paste has gone into the wrong video. lol

[@DNV970Raze]

-"Have you ever seen an atom?" - * proceeds to show an onion * -me: that's a strange looking atom

[@hsnplayz]

me too also thought the same.

[@WhoThisMonkey]

Shrek is like an onion, so atoms are essentially swamp ogres. I learned something new today.

[@sarthakhajirnis1908]

Cursed atom

[@LYCJay]

Xd

[@markkjm3333]

Good afternoon

[@Braindrain85]

I'd like to give a shout out to protons for keeping our community positive.

[@irw4350]

#metoo..................... oh, drat, its been used before

[@XiJinping14]

Boooooooo

[@jeffyweffy6398]

Nice one😎

[@apatriot6421]

It's 2020 and being positive is the worst thing now 🤣

[@nameinvalid33]

💀👍

[@CalvinHikes]

It may look blurry but it's literally the most in focus image ever taken.

[@huh2172]

The recommended has brought us together better than the pandemic ever could Edit: I've seen this 4 times in my recommended now

[@Ivy-ch4jw]

true

[@JetstreamSam343]

Truest truth out there

[@waitwhatihavefriends2181]

Ikr this was 16 hours ago I saw one 5 hours ago like damn 😟

[@quintonchristie3572]

Indeed my brother

[@gamer-px5cu]

This pandemic is made in order to divide us.

[@sandstinger3454]

when you hold a solid object and then think about it being made up of tiny round objects held together by forces not touching each other the feeling is not describable

[@stuffedpotato9826]

Ikrr!!! Same feeling when you look at the sky and realize you're looking at thousands of humongous balls of fire millions of light years away from you 🤩🤩

[@AntonioMedeiros-gb3cx]

@@mickeyindahouse12 So because we've known about things for a long time it ceases to be special? My friend, you suffer from linear thought.

[@vk67new67]

42

[@etherioussEND]

@@stuffedpotato9826 bascally looking at the past. you´ll never see the stars as they are right now in this moment but as they were tousands and millions of years away

[@fx3dv2vg7m]

And yet, you're not touching atoms of a solid object either when holding it

[@LegalLowGround]

"have you ever seen an atom?" me having seen Jimmy Neutron a ton as a kid: Pfff yeah....

[@AndroidFerret]

Me who played stalker 2000hours ..

[@poo_man]

Yeah thats about right

[@will_marvin]

When they split the atom in the pencil eraser in the crossover with fairly odd parents

[@auggie803]

-What the heii iz a PFFF

[@NaviYT]

Jimmy: “Hey professor, what happens when you split an atom?” Author minding his own business’s pencil: *BOOM*

[@DreamersDisease88]

11 years later imagine what they can see now

[@euanscotland]

I have always wondered if there is a universe in every single atom .

[@hamburger9677]

There isnt

[@accidentcarrot7225]

@@hamburger9677 Who knows?

[@hamburger9677]

@@accidentcarrot7225 no an atom is made out of subatomic particles not a universe

[@adnansaleem6167]

@@hamburger9677 you did not get the context in which the statement was probably made.

[@YouAreInfinity117]

It would’ve been really dope

[@karldilkington8587]

Why aren't there any flat atom conspiracy theories?

[@karldilkington8587]

How do you know bro? *They* could be lying to you!

[@bayybars]

Karl Dilkington the government is hiding the truth, atoms are donut shaped

[@Crunkmaster]

there are now, good job

[@cleden506]

string theory...

[@keianawhite8339]

LOL :)

[@megaraitei]

I was expecting to see like the nucleus surrounded by orbiting electron.

[@markthomson4700]

@Chad Kimberley Of course, the cloud analogy isn't right either. Electrons are merely probablistic wave functions.

[@GYJennyXD34]

electrons don’t orbit the nucleus! this is a common misconception & referred to as the solar system concept (planets orbit the sun). electrons are really clouds of the largest possibility of an existing negative charge :)

[@Kaalaantargata]

@@GYJennyXD34 I appreciate your knowledge Please post in your channel

[@kirikiri9269]

Yeah, but The title says, "The real atom", and those also dont have that much space in atomic radious, because all around the nucleous there are electrons, like so so many. A nucleous is drowning in there clouds. Thats why some molecules conduct electricity

[@clmasse]

@@GYJennyXD34 The different electronic states in an atom have a well defined angular momentum, which means that they are orbiting in some sense. The cloud picture is another misconception.

[@rajatrajput9316]

What if a single atom has a whole universe inside it😳 It means we are living nowhere but inside an atom.

[@sokka47]

I'm like, 'Wow! So they can see atoms now.' Then I realised it's 8 years ago.

[@SubtoUltraFoot]

Xd

[@_j5126]

dang i wonder how far we have gone in 8 years now

[@SubtoUltraFoot]

Yes🤣

[@anshukandulna1844]

IBM making patents for 2nm transistors

[@Chris-hw4mq]

@@anshukandulna1844 yet a fucking virus fucked the whole planet

[@wongeric720]

Me about to sleep KZbin: Have you ever seen an atom?

[@ayamisdelicious3600]

Bum be tis

[@lalawmliana7436]

So real

[@dwdadevil]

Now

[@technicalmaster-mind]

Same here!

[@emesbeeray]

Me right now

[@killerkitten7534]

“Over time microscopes have become more powerful” Me: Wow, is that what an atom looks like? Looks like an onion lol “These onion cells for example” Me: oh…

[@kimberlydowdy2063]

L o l

[@adoyo]

Yeah I thought it looked like one too

[@greenraph2825]

Same !

[@quaianthegrimreaper7556]

nah bro kinda looked like a parrot

[@adoyo]

Also nice pfp

[@robinson430]

Just imagine retiring as a registered nurse, using all your income/salary to pay rent and tax without any good investment or means of extra cash, tending to leave your profession/job that has been part of you for many years with no good funds. How will you cope?

[@rosiemaya7055]

This is actually what most families are going through, tax and rents takes almost what they got monthly, leaving them with no savings

[@aboodia6268]

That's why we need to plan ourselves via making extras in all we do because depending on paycheck that can give us our comfort and peace till we die is not guaranteed

[@gilcenesantos741]

I'm a nurse and I saw all this coming, so l've planned myself so I engaged in forex trading, little I know about the business though but so far so good, Forex trading has been my very means of savings lately while my salary goes for bills and utilities

[@shivannaali7030]

I've heard a lot complaining about how unsafe crypto and Forex trading is but honestly speaking, if you don't experience you won't know, I've seen the bad and the good part of Forex trading

[@jimmygrover859]

Investing in stocks and Crypto market is the best financial decision anyone can make but the crypto market is much more better than anything else at the moment

[@liammoore4371]

"Have you ever seen an atom?" Me: "Well yes but actually no"

[@liammoore4371]

i was meant to put “well”

[@abdullahal-mamun7365]

@@liammoore4371 edit it then

[@ninjawizard7021]

Fashion cattle: I like to do these fashion things like asking and responding Me: fucking idiot teenagers

[@ninjawizard7021]

@@abdullahal-mamun7365 you waste your time with demented people

[@BisexualPlagueDoctor]

@@ninjawizard7021 why are you hostile like that? When did anyone ever say that? I don’t give a shit about fashion, but I’ve heard zero people say that asking and responding are fashionable.

[@ThomerTD]

Have you seen an atom? *Stares at anything* Now I have

[@vodun270]

xdddd

[@thepaperbagz7620]

Ahaaaa

[@daanklein880]

Nope. Actually not. We see because there is light. The wavelength of light is basically too big to see such detail. Electrons, on the other hand, do have a wavelength small enaugh to 'see' things as small as atoms. So, if your eyes would be able to see using electrons, you would technically be looking at atoms all the time. Though, we see using light, so it's a no go for us😂

[@CeledonianError]

@@daanklein880 Well technically we're always looking at atoms, as everything is made of atoms

[@user-td4do3op2d]

He made the same joke at the start of the video. Why does this have so many upvotes?

[@advocaciafidelis]

2 AM, i have to be up at 6AM for work KZbin: have you ever seen an atom? Me: well, no. But O_O

[@joskojansa1235]

So... are you still sleeping after 2 days?

[@TheMirowGamer]

Now its me🙈

[@iyxan23]

same lmao

[@Snoopy1997Joshua]

Me at 2: 49 Am

[@ashkan.arabim]

Same but it’s 00:56

[@amberdavis5311]

I could never grasp chemistry because the pictures were always drawings and I didn't believe them and wanted to know what the things really look like this video is so helpful in my journey of knowledge

[@MrNarak]

I found the comment. Finally .

[@21MilesAhead]

I expected to get to see one atom and not 27k of atoms together

[@thebadger4040]

Ain't that a bonus?

[@davemarx7856]

you expect something that is currently impossible. even if we could isolate one atom, it would look like a blurry dot. we would not be able to see the electrons that orbit the protons and neutrons in the middle. if you look at an electron you interfere with it's orbit and possibly destroy a family of Whos.

[@TheBunnygirl20]

+Dave Marx lol

[@dianehaiber]

If you are interested in single-atom microscopy, you might want to check out David Muller's work on single-atom diffraction (scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=Qjzp1T8AAAAJ&sortby=pubdate&citation_for_view=Qjzp1T8AAAAJ:g8uWPOAv7ggC) - this is just a conference abstract but the work is probably being published soon. I'm a grad student studying electron microscopy myself, and imaging single-atoms is quite difficult due to sample syntehsis and beam-specimen interactions. In my experience of microscopy of gold nanoparticles (supported on a thin film of carbon), single atoms are briefly visible and tend to agglomerate and form tiny clusters (to minimize surface energy). So isolating one for long enough to obtain a stable image with high signal-to-noise ratio is not trivial.

[@tomislavrastovac2127]

His expectation wasn't illogical given the video title, and that's kind of the point. He's saying that the title is misleading, a click bait. Cool video nontheless..

[@BANE2025]

That’s why my thoughts are so hazy. They won’t stand still.

[@dryxeyes]

(☞ ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)☞

[@HassanPoyo]

*Ba dumm tsss*

[@yramecarg3549]

Actually you have a point

[@BANE2025]

@I love you!! maybe so. There’s more to it than we think. AI probably solve it.

[@BANE2025]

Even self identity fluctuates and is ethereal in nature. We are the sum of our memories, feelings and decisions. But it’s flimsy at best. I am truly not sure what I am. I just know I am aware and here. The rest is atoms in a pattern.

[@aminimoose3971]

"Have you ever seen an atom?" "I am atoms." --Some guy named Adam

[@waitwhatihavefriends2181]

The adams family

[@chornobylreactor4]

Atoms crafts store got some real nice graphite pencils

[@bruhsset]

Megan Fox and MKG in an alternate universe

[@borayucel4911]

Did you wanna tell “Adam” in turkish or surname one

[@borkbread3056]

Now I’m waiting to see what a quark looks like

[@DR-7]

"Scients have found a way to see a singular atom!" Me, who can see billions:

[@draesanchez7039]

Hm

[@aspxct.aep1]

Lol

[@shivangsingh5834]

😂😂😂

[@smallcock269]

I can see gijoloctimusolians of them

[@scottmeager5919]

DR. 7 is ahead of the game.

[@Medicranger]

Ah, atoms... the pixels of the universe.

[@emmanueloverrated]

They aren't, they are way too big... The size of a "universe pixel", if such a thing exists, would be more about at the scale of the Planck length, thus about 60,000,000,000,000,000,000 times smaller than a single proton. :P 4k TVs still not that impressive.

[@xbone4138]

+Nekkz what about quantum foam??

[@quarkyquasar893]

No, Not even close.

[@quarkyquasar893]

Smithstirini Well, about 1 atom per 4.18x10^(-30)m^3....

[@davidlee2221]

+Nekkz thats if we live in a quantized universe, if we life in a continuum than were fucked for determining basic unit size.. its like being inside a cube in space and asking which direction the floor is.

[@bainy8366]

Have you ever seen an atom? **shows onion** Me: WTF

[@navagharkiran5769]

Alle bulle in onion also atom has

[@hocuscantfocus5375]

You mean "Anion" 🕶️

[@zikiel3716]

@@navagharkiran5769 not kidding

[@vierspartan117]

You're new in this side of KZbin

[@Rama_Verma_]

@@navagharkiran5769 😂😂😂😂 that contains cell buddy

[@Nby-DIH]

It's interesting to see real blurry images than high-quality Cartoon images!! Thanks!!

[@patzino7701]

Thinking about these atoms feels almost weird as thinking about space and time.

[@AldenJohnson]

its funny that we've made atoms indirectly show us what atoms look like

[@harryballzanga]

Maybe what we observe as space is simply something the size of an atom in something of a greater scale.

[@s3ntin3l60]

@@AldenJohnson that's why I don't quite buy this lol. Atom...help me see an atom.

[@ay33773]

@@harryballzanga we’re just a universe inside an atom

[@talizorahnarrayya5916]

@@s3ntin3l60 wdym?

[@ultimategohan7567]

"have you ever seen an atom" Why yes, I have electron microscope as eyes, what did you expect..

[@aurelienani5927]

idiot

[@lemonbirdo1353]

[@halowraith1]

Delicious Kawaiigami some maybe, but not this one.

[@lemonbirdo1353]

+halowraith1 :'( succ

[@jwvtube]

hahaah

[@Soluchi-InfiniteCoCreatorGod]

1:35 the atoms look like a bunch of Hexagons strung together.

[@neurozenith73]

"Hexagon, IS the bestagon!"

[@danny6269]

More proof that we are all just a simulation

[@theworldofchachundar5628]

They are the bestagons after all

[@mykkola8614]

Not the bees!!! AAAAHhhhH!!!

[@manuelramirezwork]

@@danny6269 they would be circles to get better fps

[@seanmacleod1724]

My grandmother is made up entirely of Nanny-Particles…. That’s my contribution to this amazing scientific study.

[@PabloGonzalez-hv3td]

Technically we've seen trillions upon trillions of atoms but we've never seen One.

[@alanoken3097]

God is the One Atom...

[@delphi4213]

@@alanoken3097 What

[@dartanyanthemeow-sketeer8674]

@@alanoken3097 what

[@santhoshs1798]

🤣🤣👍🏼

[@snflwrchan8019]

@@alanoken3097 if so, that god is so damn small and that would be why we havent seen em

[@LegoEddy]

"Read the paper here" "Closed Access" Well thanks. Very nice of you to communicate science so openly!

[@flosa1995]

Working again lol They probably edited something

[@LegoEddy]

floSa ­ Nope. They still want 30$ for reading the full article. For reading an article that they did not even make themselves and that they did not even review themselves and which they were paid for for publishing it.

[@flosa1995]

Oh lol... Well just go for: Subscribe to Nature for full access: €209 :P

[@croja07]

Bahahahahahahha

[@untitled9229]

Most scientific journals will require you to pay to view the paper, unless you are in an academic field or a student. It's still pretty stupid, but they have to get funding somehow

[@afraibnat4621]

Me: Can’t imagine how small an atom is Also me: Can’t imagine how enormous the multiverse is

[@TheRealSuit]

also me: Can't imagine how enormous the biggest black hole ton 618 is

[@JeeterJuice]

I’m gonna go Astro project to go explore the solar system

[@feenboi8930]

Midnight_ Editz astral*

[@honey3206]

Not solar system , UNIVERSE

[@SunitaSharma-qe4rk]

Also me: Can't imagine how enormous the whole universe is (or maybe multiverse)

[@PiyushYadav-dp2gi]

Props to the cameraman to fit in such tiny spaces

[@savcob6291]

Saw 2 helium isotopes... He He...

[@rundom9047]

XD

[@silicalnz3008]

+savcob I am such a nerd xD

[@teeman9266]

+savcob buh-dum, TISH

[@tombradford7035]

I'm that stupid I didn't get that joke.

[@savcob6291]

Tom Bradford Helium is designated in chemistry as He

[@GM-dg6mj]

_have you ever seen an atom?_ ant man: **laughs in particles**

[@Daniel-dd6sj]

He hasn't seen an atom because he goes subatomic really fast

[@Daniel-dd6sj]

@Thomas Daka really weird

[@allah___maadarchod]

Ant-Man can't see an atom.

[@allah___maadarchod]

@Thomas Daka do you think that the size of the electrons, protons and nutrons are shrinkable?🤔

[@allah___maadarchod]

@Thomas Daka well, the concept of the abilities of ant-man are not fictional by the way. Don't ask me anything about that. Just know that these abilities exist. You believe it or not, i leave that upto you. Oh btw, electrons, protons and nutrons are not shrinkable for god's sake !! You just make a material more dense when you shrink it. You don't lose molecules or mass while doing so. Similarly you don't gain mass by expanding something. That's basic physics. Well, if you notice, i didn't mention about weight. Why? I let you to find the answer.

[@douglasthompson9070]

You're not seeing the actual atoms. You're seeing the electron vibrations of the atoms. The atom is mostly empty space with a nucleus. And that nucleus is 100K times smaller than the width of the atom. So the 3D model is a representation of the representational image of the outer electron shell of a bunch of platinum atoms. Most likely using a modified electron microscope. But it's still cool.

[@douglasthompson9070]

Of course, what is seeing anyway but just a very narrow bandwidth of visible light photons bouncing off energy fields of electrons traveling around at the speed of light then hitting our eyes for our brain to process. The energy fields are all we will ever get see I think on the atomic level.

[@VeNoMS4]

they use a TEM for this and there are no photons involved here. it's all electrons because you cannot get a photon beam in the angstroms

[@Ferelmakina]

not really. in a metallic bond like that, the cores are toghether and the electrons move freely around the material

[@elimalinsky7069]

Well, seeing the electron cloud is crazy enough as it is. Seeing the actual nucleus and individual protons and neutrons is still science-fiction.

[@Ferelmakina]

Eli Malinsky IF they exist...

[@perfi4333]

Atoms are also the reason we are watching this.

[@felpel1027]

That’s so crazy! The atoms are aligned in perfectly straight lines and order, that means perfectly straight lines do exist in Nature, if you go deep enough

[@mikemondano3624]

Wrong.

[@fosibro4951]

@@mikemondano3624 explain

[@gamer-px5cu]

@@mikemondano3624 Existence it self comes before nature, we can create a perfect angle so a perfect angle actually exist.

[@t-dog8528]

@@gamer-px5cu perfection is when you stop and say "I'm happy with the outcome" like my uneducated response, perfect. And the participation award goes tooooooo, ME🙆🙆🙆🙋🎉🥇

[@Young_Dab]

@@gamer-px5cu What created existence? 🤔 Or how is existence created? 🤔

[@demonslayer045]

Fun fact :- you never actually touch any object, because every object including you is made of atom which is surrounded by orbits of electrons having negative charges. When you touch it with your hands the electrons of your hand and the electrons of the object (having like charges ) start repelling ,hence there is always an extremely small gap

[@elka-bs8590]

Ye

[@rohanbari]

+1 That's right.

[@JoseLopez-tk4tq]

Okay, but what about all those "flavors" of quarks?

[@pranayaughade9406]

Meanwhile me a weeb : so everyone's gojo🤡✨

[@miak.5196]

Great, I can use this on my court hearing tomorrow. Thanks bro!

[@harrisonmoore3841]

“Have I seen an atom?” Well yes, but actually no.

[@CHUCKNORRIS-qw1me]

i have seen atoms not an atom.

[@Rogèr05-y1s]

It has 69 likes i don't wanto like it

[@trt2013]

I daily see Trillions of Atoms! 😎

[@Viruherumu]

Me being made of atoms watching a video of atoms showing me atoms looking at atoms under a bunch of atoms on a device made of atoms.

[@helpmeget1ksubs.please284]

*"So, after all... Its just pixels?"* *"N- actually, you got a point."*

[@tanphatvo9670]

@DON'T are you mad we are not reading your profile? Or are you mad we “read” your profile...I didn’t even read it..what are you mad at

[@wojak6351]

@@tanphatvo9670 he wants you to don't do it

[@technologicalelite]

@DON'T old

[@AnamRafat]

@DON'T 😑 another one

[@tainted_bread]

I... That... **dies**

[@utkarshagarwal903]

So this video was basically - Have you seen an atom ? -No -Even we haven't

[@kingsleymichael7533]

Succinct.

[@TaylorYarick]

I don't know why you'd comment that or why you have so many thumbs up. They literally showed you a lattice of individual atoms in the video. You can see each atom individually therefore you've now seen an atom

[@K.B.Williams]

Fuc kYourAds agreed. That would be amazing to see

[@almak8785]

Utkarsh Agarwal THANK U ! i almost wasted time watching this already known shit

[@ColinForBooks]

I was wondering about the fact that electrons are so far away from the nucleus, so what are we actually seeing? You said electron clouds, and that makes sense to me. The video makes ya think that an atom is a solid thing - cloud seems better. Thanks!

[@iwattasandwich8672]

"How you ever seen an atom?" Oppenheimer: No, but I've split atoms.

[@LoLFilmStudios]

This is pretty dangerous, some people might say atomic bombs do not exist.

[@TheBaffledZone]

@@LoLFilmStudios what the fuck

[@kaibluck1380]

@@TheBaffledZone atomic bombs work due to a chain reaction that splits atoms and releases the nuclear energy inside of them

[@adambahri9369]

Little dark there bro

[@HumanAndroid18]

@@LoLFilmStudios I know someone who says that

[@senthilvasanmuthan2644]

so...entire solar system is an atom of something unimaginably big

[@mb5612]

“Have you ever seen an atom?” Then for two seconds I’m like, “Damn, an atom looks just like a slice of red onion!” 😂

[@genos7184]

😂

[@roseequine7628]

Exactly what I thought! 😂

[@spaghettiNmeqtballs]

red?

[@linvagod]

red?

[@Congable]

red?

[@sm__akash]

I still remember that moment when I asked my high school teacher whether he ever saw the electron or not and in response I was sent out of the class for being a disturbing element in the class.😁

[@meetings5145]

Good 4 u!!

[@aadityakumarkarn]

@Em Zet India 😂

[@Metrion77]

@RCube Clips Yep. Our knowledge about atoms is defined by our knowledge of electrons. And our knowledge of electrons is defined by our knowledge of atoms. Circular theoretical science: We know because we wrote a paper saying we know.

[@metricdeep8856]

SM Akash “disturbing element”. I like what you did there.

[@nani54100]

@@aadityakumarkarn bhakths spoted

[@matteocarta7678]

Before this video... I've never seen an atom. After this video. I've never seen an atom

[@mr.evasion]

Is the thing with atoms and everything else for that matter VIBRATION. nothing is ever in a big enough space for a long enough time . Is this a Quantom Thing?

[@rogerpersod9675]

Nor have you ever seen a grain of sand; so what, sand does not exist as grains???

[@Snipsey01]

what?

[@mr.evasion]

If an atom could fill a ball park (stadium) then the nucleus of protons/ and/or neutrons would be the size of a grain of rice (!) The" empty space " is ENERGY. that's what we observe......

[@elicthanks7578]

Actualy since electromagnetic waves are disturbances in the electric and magnetic fields we can't in reality see atoms just their movements, atoms are literaly speaking "invisible"

[@TRVPHAUS]

that makes literally no sense.

[@letsgoquizzing2346]

Dalton :- No further than atom Today's scientists :- what's next after quarks ?? 😂😂😂😂😂

[@Physics_Rin]

😂😂😂😂

[@Fivekey100]

Recently my course mates told our teacher that he did not teach us Dalton's atomic theory which he should have because it was in the book And my teacher burst into anger on us and on Dalton as if Dalton was his son who did not pause online games ... he considered his theory that useless 😂

[@letsgoquizzing2346]

@@Fivekey100 😂😂

[@tanih_bhat]

Strings

[@pumpkin162]

Live would've been easier won't it??

[@bernz2507]

"Have you ever seen an atom?" Yes, its everywhere

[@shaheedharun445]

I see over 800 trillion of them right now

[@EnterJester]

Well.. 0:06

[@absolutelynoone3296]

More like everything’s

[@Andresenie]

mmmhhhhhhhhh

[@judyreyjumamoy]

have you ever seen an atom? this video: we neither

[@kalaiyarasangunasekaran1835]

🤣

[@esar1499]

Exactly, these are 3D videos wtf.

[@purpleman5243]

Hahahahahah

[@lilyjr.1384]

1 John 1:9 If we confess our sins He is faithful and just to forgive us and cleanse us from all unrighteousness ❤️

[@LuciferW1727]

A video where atoms show atoms, atoms in atoms.

[@LinKueiDragon]

Funny how you ask someone if they have ever seen an atom, when atoms literally make up everything

[@chocolate_squiggle]

They are smaller than the wavelength of light that we use to 'see' - so no, no-one has ever 'seen' an atom. It's literally impossible.

[@peelsreklaw]

We only "see" photons, and then not really...we see the projection of them into our consciousness. So all we really see is consciousness...is it made of atoms? Idk

[@kifi672]

Energy is making up everything, yet we don't see it either

[@krisreddish3066]

@@peelsreklaw yes. Thoughts themselves are surely matter when stored in any case even when the chemicals of thoughts are not considered, only the electrical signal.

[@WhiteUnicorn82]

@@peelsreklaw "Seeing" incorporates all from electrical signaling pathways of the brain/optical nerve/cones, photons after interactions with objects, and the interpretations we all make, etc, so we do all "see" these things, with photons making up just a part of what's needed for seeing.. I'm sure you knew this, however. We've slipped more towards language and definitions now :-/

[@mttkenzn51310]

Narrator: Have you seen an atom? My atoms: *gasps* they're finally talking about us! Let's go guys to the top of his head!

[@coastachancka]

LOL

[@Freeemon]

*desintegrates*

[@spyaccount6396]

Im just imagining them bouncing to get on top of the head ITS SUCH A STUPID BUT FUNNY THING TO IMAGINE

[@TalpaTulpa]

@marouane Attahali it’s not chance or luck, it’s just things happening

[@TalpaTulpa]

When it has all the time in the world- time even BEYOND the world, how much chance and luck do you possibly need?

[@Nomadic_1]

If you zoom in even further, you’ll see a blue ball circling another large yellowish-orange ball

[@ducky4303]

and the blue ball has "-" on it and the orange ball has "+"

[@butterchuggins5409]

That takes a lot of balls.

[@brianlaudrupchannel]

Get out

[@canpy143]

Bahahaha, i like that!

[@larsswig912]

@@ducky4303 if you zoom in even further into the orange ball, you will see little red balls with pluses and plain green balls zoom in even further and you see even smaller little balls in groups of three with the letters u and d on them

[@massimilianomontelatici9897]

I spent the second half of the video figuring out if the image is rotating left or right....

[@Burbie]

This was 7 years ago... I wonder what advancements have happened to this

[@starscream2092]

Now we can render this exact same video in 4K

[@adamvarghesesatish3337]

Ummm this was 8 years ago loser . I am now filing a complaint against you to the police for being so dumb that you can't calculate how long ago 2013 was. You will also pay for my medical bills as I lost brain cells seeing you write down this was 7 years ago. I don't care if you call me a Karen.

[@Burbie]

@@adamvarghesesatish3337 u dont no how to count boomer It was on 27th of march 2013 , it's 16th march 2021 as of today 8 years hasn't completed yet And KZbin automatically shows for me "7 years ago" stupid fuck

[@adamvarghesesatish3337]

@@Burbie 🤣🤣🤣 I have successfully completed the task of trying to troll someone online without using aggressive or angry words . I tried my best to make a comment that does not make me look like I am pissed and somehow try and make someone else mad. I have done that succesfully even by being sarcastic. I want my internet points now

[@Burbie]

@@adamvarghesesatish3337 oh fuck off idiot...

[@bigchungus6320]

“Have you ever seen an atom” Yes but actually no

[@tfsplayer2275]

Lol🤣🤣

[@pellebelle9364]

yesen't

[@megalucario4909]

That's actually very accurate description

[@peppereater3028]

Neutron walks into a bar and asks how much for a drink, bartender says for you no charge.

[@srinukondapalli6160]

Really?

[@chaoticyatan7115]

#Lmao 😄

[@tinkmarshino]

well that took guts! well played!

[@AbhishekKumar-gx6oj]

😂sheldon cooper

[@einherz]

no, he said no, you'll again lost your electron and will looks like fucking proton

[@beanju1ce_995]

“have you ever seen an atom?” 21.4 million people: *interesting*

[@CrammyCram]

“Have you ever seen an atom?” Me: yes, but I’ll click anyway

[@spidermanfromufa]

aee)

[@shinchanyt6089]

@Melon Musk your name tho

[@shinchanyt6089]

@Melon Musk no that name is not funny your orginal name is funny. I really can't stop laughing till now.

[@Dennizzz119]

This was 8,5 years ago. Just imagine what has happened and has been learned in the mean time!

[@omegaz6257]

Yeah, atoms are cool.

[@rkpyi8616]

In 2019 if im not wrong they got blackhole picture

[@TheSamuiman]

Yes, how to create global hysteria about something that always existed and force entire populations to do things one never ever thought or even dreamed about!

[@omegaz6257]

@@rkpyi8616 Yes they did, it was orange-ish in the photo.

[@matthewclark6239]

Nothing major, or we would have heard about it.

[@denilsson31]

What we see is the electric field of the atom. It is impossible to see it like we commonly understand it.

[@DanielRamirez-vm3be]

Uncertainty Principle, in one image

[@thesnare100]

Yes, I think it may be impossible to actually see the subatomic particles- that is- the nucleus and the electrons. There's the scanning tunnel microscope which shows them as small spheres, but I'm not sure it's possible to actually see the proton and the electron that orbits it in a hydrogen atom. The way our eyes work is by picking up visible light waves that reflect off of something, visible light couldn't reflect off of a proton or an electron.

[@giotag1819]

+thesnare100 We are talking about *electron* microscopes here, and by "seeing" we mean scanning a target with an electron beam, then detecting the transmitted beam or the interactions with the sample's surface, and transforming that into an image on a screen, which our eyes can see. The minimum wavelength of visible light (400 nm) means the theoretical limit of the resolution of a light microscope is around 200 nm, much more than the size of an atom.

[@ffggddss]

+ denilsson31 It's an *imaging technique*. But then, so are our eyes, if you really break down the physics of seeing. So yes, we *are* seeing atoms here. Granted, it's somewhat second-hand, because we see, with our eyes, the images of them that are produced by this contraption; but that's qualitatively no different from looking at something through an ordinary light microscope.

[@DanielRamirez-vm3be]

Another way to see them would be using x-rays or gamma rays instead of visible light, cause them have their wavelengths closer to the scales of an atom and a nucleus respectfully, and let the computer do the work transforming the data into visible light, like the infrared images of the Hubble

[@Yesysysgyagyuagaaaw]

“Have you ever seen an atom?” The thumbnail: now i have

[@diptadeepdas9562]

Think our universe just look like this from outer space, however we are just a speck inside a super giant something living.

[@geraldford6409]

There are some theories that our entire Universe is smaller than a Quark inside a larger universe

[@clapdrix72]

@@geraldford6409 What theories? Where are they published? I think you watched too much Men in Black.

[@Lyrical14369]

@@clapdrix72 not everyone is a conspiracy theorist, just go on google and type it in.

[@geraldford6409]

@@clapdrix72 I should have said belief systems, as in Eastern or new age philosophies. The idea is, once you introduce additional spatial dimensions as string (ie sub quark scale) theory does, then like Dr Who’s Tardis, a Universe could fit into what appears to us a finite enclosed volume, whatever the scale of that volume. Similar to the Flatland 2d universe story, it’s inhabitants witnessing a 3D object like a sphere pass through their 2d universe, first an infinitesimal point, the a growing circle, then shrinking back down to a point and disappears. See Dalai Lama The Universe in a Single Atom: The Convergence of Science and Spirituality

[@xanthos9641]

@@geraldford6409 Yeah I thought that when I was a child. No one can really concretely disprove it though (the big bang theory is almost concrete, but not truly proven), so I guess we'll never know until... we know lol

[@childhoodtraumacore]

"Have you ever seen an atom?" 18 million people: *"Maybe, lets confirm"* Edit1: changed from 16mil to 17mil in 4hrs Edit2: 18 mil now in 1 day

[@user-lv1im7so5b]

Its 17 now

[@childhoodtraumacore]

holy shit 4 hours ago it was 16. Will just edit this out 👍

[@nonfb]

@@childhoodtraumacore and this was uploaded years ago..

[@Demomain-]

KZbin's algorithm: Ah, a video released 8 years ago. *i t ' s r e l e v a n t*

[@ohareair552]

You don’t need to change it, no one will be mad at you

[@Djmikibg88]

So basically nobody has seen a atom.

[@Ace0077]

very important to use quotation marks here

[@xImBeaST12321x]

well atoms are far smaller then the wavelengths of light that our eyes have evolved to detect... so it is impossible to see an atom, hence why they use electron microscopes, but I am pretty sure individual atoms are still too small to be mapped with these special microscopes, however, I may be wrong...

[@scottrose7737]

A "picture" of a hydrogen atom was made a couple years ago. The reason I put it in quotation marks is because it's more of an energy reading of a single atom rather than a physical picture of an atom, (which is probably impossible.)

[@greendino8681]

Djmikibg88 I have and with a naked eye

[@User39814]

v

[@卢军宏台长心灵法-u3d]

Being safe and well is a blessing. Being virtuous leads to longevity. Being content is a mark of prosperity. Letting nature take its course is noble.

[@faithfulgrl]

This is so beyond the part of my brain that I know how to use.

[@eugefederico1178]

😂

[@nettowaku1252]

Have you seen an atom? "Well yes but actually no."

[@unlikepluto2085]

Yeah 😒

[@theball-busterchannel7226]

I've seen a Tom... nice fella

[@firegator6853]

i see many of them on the screen of my PC lol

[@aa-tx9su]

1:26 Oh cool you can see the 3D figure of the atom going left or right

[@katniseverdien594]

A bunch of atoms looking at another bunch of atoms.

[@lsporky3567]

If the atoms are the pixels of the universe... damn I'm so HD 6,7 10^27

[@happydolphin1432]

CarasGlassees Sounds stupid, doesn't works

[@razmuzen1090]

"Doesn't works" ironic

[@DavidSanchez-tf3xo]

CarasGlassees maybe someone is ultra HD and they have a singularity TV.

[@chadliampearcy]

Well How about ultra HD. Quarks and Electrons.

[@briandiehl9257]

Actually plank length s the pixels, in which nothing can be smaller

[@SimulationWithDaniel]

And this is 2013 omg 3 years later and ive never heard of this before lol

[@ricksande2210]

Same XD

[@davemarx7856]

That's the way They want it. 😐

[@Pidgey95]

same

[@robin9740]

+Dave Marx I've used electron microscopy as a first year bachelor student. So no, they want us to know about this discovery. There would be no reason to not tell the world. It just wasn't sensational enough for mainstream media.

[@davemarx7856]

Robin Van Gaalen I was making a conspiracy theory joke. But, yeah. It's unfortunate that media will jump on "Flossing. Not really important?" but gloss over "Atomic particles? Still hard to see."

[@sushantillusionist5786]

we are made of atoms studying about atoms means atoms is studying itself

[@Robertas919]

You have no idea how close to truth you are... :D

[@heavyglassglass]

+Robertas Ciparis Do you know the truth? WHAT ARE YOU HIDING FROM US?

[@Robertas919]

heavyglassglass Adom and Eve = Atom and Electron Thats all I will say to you. :D

[@CharlieTangoYankee]

"We have begun to contemplate our origins: starstuff pondering the stars; organized assemblages of ten billion billion billion atoms considering the evolution of atoms; tracing the long journey by which, here at least, consciousness arose." -Carl Sagan, "Cosmos"

[@F4Y541]

heavyglassglass it's just their retarded atoms overwhelming their regular atoms... Lol!

[@darrylkassle361]

This makes understanding how at a quantum level things are both a particle and wave .