Visualizing video at the speed of light - one trillion frames per second

MIT Media Lab researchers have created a new imaging system that can acquire visual data at a rate of one trillion frames per second. That's fast enough to produce a slow-motion video of light traveling through objects.
Video: Melanie Gonick/MIT
Read more: web.mit.edu/newsoffice/2011/tr...
Project website: www.media.mit.edu/~raskar/tril...
Follow us on Twitter: / mitnews

[@adinansulley8618]

I'll pretend I understood everything

[@gurleenkahlon7256]

😂😂😂😂

[@Email5507]

@@abhishekchaturvedi6348 He is understand idiot

[@abhishekchaturvedi6348]

@@Email5507but u did'nt understand my comment....now who's idiot?? Like my comment because it took me half an hour to understand your english

[@nathanielluke2084]

@@abhishekchaturvedi6348 yes, he are have stupid. Your comment I understand can 30 minutes less. Woo hoo!🎉

[@abhishekchaturvedi6348]

@@nathanielluke2084 yeah bro😂😂

[@j.olazaran3868]

*When you realize this was **-7 years ago 8 years ago 9 years ago 10 years ago 11 years ago-** 12 years ago*

[@mvl71]

Yeah, they need to make another video. Light is much faster now.

[@Mello.]

Turrebo I have never face palmed so hard in my life. I think I’m in love

[@user-ui3du4uh2e]

Suka blyat' you God damn right

[@IosifStalinsendsyoutoGulag]

@@mvl71 Damn constant updates... when does this beta testing end?

[@hackereports1128]

@@Mello. u know that he's kidding... right???

[@millennial_weeb2382]

1:47 *Really, nobody did a timestamp I had to?*

[@bhavyanayak4342]

Lol

[@ricardokessler]

You need more likes people need to know about this

[@renee8669]

Thanks

[@del_1523]

Thanks

[@a_man7818]

No, we only care about that white guy has an indian accent 🗿, thx u btw 😀

[@drmushtaqahmadmalik4417]

After 8 years, KZbin finally found me worthy to give this recommendation!!

[@Opfzzwm4-7tvstkjpU]

Took me 12 years.

[@VENOMYT5]

Yeah. 12 years for me too

[@vatsalgandhi5089]

*I am so addicted to light. It's like I can't even see without it.*

[@phonso6904]

Same

[@taniyagautam4780]

Everyone is addicted ☺☺☺

[@johnrubensaragi4125]

No one gets the joke

[@erikasl.7050]

I would say its a good joke but nah, addicted needs to be replaced with other word bcs thats like "im so addicted to my legs. Its like i cant even walk without em"...

[@skullcrawler18]

Joke of the decade

[@fatelvis6924]

These are the people who like studying maths on Sundays

[@DieselpunkMachine]

I am too, bro!

[@SHADOW-ol4xd]

Lmao

[@zabbb_05]

I watch on sunday

[@vindhya8498]

😂😂

[@sachinz4199]

Instead, they should study quantum physics.

[@ramasharma3399]

For class 12th students 2:18 this is what a wavefront is.

[@arneshpal7702]

no

[@Indian_Rajput]

Wave fronts expands in all directions

[@shreesha3638]

Hehe yeH

[@CronixEdits]

Did you even pass the 12th grade? That's not what a wave front is 🤡

[@Robinov98]

It is honestly pretty cool how we have come this far in technology

[@victorpapillon1487]

This is 11 years old, imaginr what they are witholding today.

[@halonothing1]

I agree, wholeheartedly. I also very much respect your insight into how amazing things like this are. Too many people brush it off saying "well that's not useful." But people did that with computers for almost a century or more. There are just some cases where the technology is so advanced, we can't even imagine uses for it. And there are tons of examples in history of technologies that were overlooked because they were ahead of their time. Or people. Like Ramanujan. He was a poor Indian fellow who was a brilliant mathematician, but being poor he didn't have a formal education and as a result of those two factors, nobody took him seriously for a long time. His work went over the heads of many of his peers, so having no academic credentials, they just brushed him off. Meanwhile he wound up being this insanely brilliant kid. It's kind of sad and makes you wonder how many other scientific geniuses have been overlooked like that over the years.

[@huyup123456]

And I'm still sticking suppositories up my arse just for the hell of it.

[@ninnellovrik]

Yet In morality we have regressed to pre-ceramics

[@patdohrety2940]

What you meant to say was "How only the Americans are capable of building this technology." Every other wannabe society steals our technology

[@reefleaf7326]

one trillion frames per second. *me: watches in 2x*

[@kurumi394]

MIT: *Wait. That's illegal.*

[@timchaoskiller]

S T O N K S

[@drugofsweetness]

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@RoYal-xz5ch]

Watches in 0.25× it's 4 trillion 😱

[@ak3t0n]

@@RoYal-xz5ch FBI: stay right where you are

[@itanmayi]

When your lab mate so indian, you develop his accent

[@kuruptzZz]

Huh? He sounds european, german maybe

[@itanmayi]

@@kuruptzZz Exactly, indians try so hard to develop their english accent for scams, they almost forgot their own accent sometimes... lol p.s. i`m also an indian and it was joke so dont abuse me later

[@user-kt3jn7wx5f]

@@itanmayi 😂😂

[@ViratKohli-jj3wj]

@@itanmayi I hate indians tbh

[@menakadias4287]

@@itanmayi No, the Indian accent sticks with them even when they try to change it

[@Daniel-dg8hd]

these are the type of people that cry when they get 98% on a test

[@HueHanaejistla]

Daniel • why aren’t you

[@Daniel-dg8hd]

@@HueHanaejistla Why am I not what? grades dont matter for what I'm doing , if thats what your talking about

[@HueHanaejistla]

@@Daniel-dg8hd why don't you cry when you get a 98%? if you would have gotten a 100% you would get scholarships and avoid thousands of dollars of debt. i would cry if i got a 98% or below, which is most of the time, cause that means no scholarship for me :((((((

[@Daniel-dg8hd]

@@HueHanaejistla i didnt go to college. dont go to college so you dont need scholarships and you won’t get into debt and will earn more

[@HueHanaejistla]

@@Daniel-dg8hd no college no job

[@Rationalific]

It's about 9 years later, and this is still amazing. One of the biggest breakthroughs in imaging, similar to the first image of a black hole (released in 2019).

[@danielarcher369]

no "black hole" was ever imaged, black holes do not exist

[@BudDougherty]

Black holes are still theoretical. The photo is of what they only belie e could maybe possibly be one.

[@danielarcher369]

@@BudDougherty they are not really theoretical either, as it is based on false math and assumptions.

[@BudDougherty]

@@danielarcher369 Indeed. We need a more comprehensive theory of quantum gravity to even begin to suggest the formation of black holes, let alone their event horizon or singularity.

[@danielarcher369]

@@BudDougherty physical gravity is solved by Miles Mathis, it is the binding energy of matter as all matter recycles photons.

[@Stay___Strong]

When the white guy started speaking, I thought he was imitating the Indian guy’s accent.

[@fastcurious8081]

His name is Ramesh Rasker. He is Indian and working as Associate professor in MIT Media Lab. Many Indians working in MIT, NASA, etc.

[@master_Blaster91]

Lee Thasi not really it's people who believe that a white man doing an accent of a different race is racist that need to check themselves

[@lethai2670]

@@master_Blaster91 oh yeah i forgot i misread it

[@robinhyperlord9053]

@@Icewind007 The SJWs are justified. Grow up.

[@jimf1964]

The only way they would let him in the project is if he was Indian.

[@huaynaX]

*Video just shows the speed of light* Comments: why is the white guy sounding like a indian

[@PSP-lr7ms]

Because not all indians have brown skin, india have many climatic conditions which give different colors and other distinctive features

[@User-jr7vf]

Because he works with Indians and that makes him also speak like them.

[@PSP-lr7ms]

@Nhilistic Komrad nice joke komrad😂

[@Piyush8681]

So sounding indian is a bad thing or a funny thing according to you🤨🤨

[@donebro4403]

@Nhilistic Komrad your voice is not a bad thing for me..judging people by their voices,imagine scientists make judgement according to what they see..... Destruction!!!

[@celebrityrog]

11 years later and nothing has come from this

[@x_Shadow67]

What an utterly asinine comment. Large scientific breakthroughs take decades upon decades of collaborative research in a specific area. If you were in touch with this kind of thing at all you’d know that the Nobel prize in physics this past year was awarded to an even faster form of this exact kind of technology

[@kilroy987]

0:33 this is really cool. I'm guessing the light pulse is occurring from a pinpoint somewhere nearby where the arc would converge. But I wonder if there should be more of a deformation of the arc shape, since some surfaces are farther away from the camera, and it takes light that much longer to reach the camera.

[@tjatsa]

Find a girl...

[@laurenpinschannels]

... Who shares your interests

[@willmcclard206]

hm. i was wondering if we could use this to measure one way speed of light but now you’re making me think we cannot, by using this

[@fruitfarmfactory7901]

_"one trillion frames per second"_ PC Master Race!

[@pilgrimlarry]

Fruit Farm Factory lololololololol Nice!

[@dj.avian.madrid]

Yeaaa pc master race rules

[@broogz]

If you have a 144hz monitor you can only see up to 144fps. LET'S INVENT A TRILLION Hz DISPLAY

[@forti8209]

Lol my PS1 had that

[@derLenno]

Unlimited power

[@zar3865]

When a car drives by my bed room window late at night

[@sakshamsood7480]

Zepar right!

[@bananaman7537]

@Jerry Gonzales Wtf...

[@farooq8fox]

@Jerry Gonzales Bruh

[@bassinburban8928]

@Jerry Gonzales well damn. That escalated quickly

[@itsgenti8910]

@Jerry Gonzales shit went from 0 to 100 real quick

[@krishnanshvyas6979]

Dr. Ramesh Raskar sir is a Professor at MIT. I am Proud to be an indian.

[@OverlandOne]

Last year, I built my own photon accelerator. It accelerates photons from 0 to the speed of light nearly instantaneously. Some people call it a flashlight, but I prefer the term photon accelerator.

[@whitefeather8387]

Cool😮

[@anonymousstacker2044]

still cool to be able to build your own flashlight my guy

[@pulverizedpeanuts]

photons don't accelerate they're always moving at the speed of light in a flashlight, particles are excited via electricity to release photons

[@OverlandOne]

@@pulverizedpeanuts Well, theoretically, there is no such thing as "instantaneous acceleration" so, once created there has to be some period of acceleration no matter how small. I was a physics major in college, although that was a long time ago but I have not read of any rewriting of any laws since graduation.

[@pulverizedpeanuts]

@@OverlandOne yes, but the comment i was replying to stated that the flashlight is accelerating photons so, in that context, i replied that they're always moving at the speed of light, which isn't false i said that they don't accelerate, not that they haven't ever accelerated

[@jasonenc4093]

I'd like to see this used to visualize the delay of movement when looking at a mirror/reflection.

[@friedchicken1]

you would get no delay

[@RiddimDubstep]

No, you would.

[@lonewalker5446]

I don't know. But i wonder how human brain create an image from the light waves coming from different directions.

[@squidwardo7074]

Arvaci That would be awesome.

[@Wegster64]

Great idea !

[@alexandersemundset7725]

Films for 0.1 second "Aight, we're out of memory!"

[@skwozies3083]

0.1 seconds would probably take years to watch. We are talking about 7 times around the earth per second (the speed of light). So if we can imagine the speed through the digitally replaced soda bottle and going that speed almost around the circumference of the globe, it would prob take us years to watch said video. You could work out the math if you wanted to.

[@lawganime9311]

@@skwozies3083 you’re damn right that will be 30 000 000 m see at a speed of around .1 meter second so it will take 300 000 000 s to watch(close to 10 years)

[@AmidaNyorai48]

Lol

[@priyaj5283]

@@lawganime9311 I'm just gonna agree with you .. 👍

[@Alaska-mk4ok]

lol

[@xd_adventure_innovation]

Can you guys please film the double slit experiment with a regular light source and also with a laser beam?

[@hexagonmagnetics569]

The act of filming would alter the behavior!!!

[@PYC1337]

1:21 this guy's bald spot represents that time when scientists are forced to use 100% of their brain clock reaching "high temps".

[@PYC1337]

@Gaurav N i am glad you liked it)

[@asmeet2005]

Why it's soo underrated?!? THAT'S a Crime!

[@improvingguitarist1595]

They're overclocking their brain

[@kikodimov880]

So what you've actually filmed whas the refresh rate of the universe :D

[@DrShikura]

Quantum theory suggests that light moves at the speed of causality, or to put it broadly, the speed of time. The speed of light may be constant, but only from the perspective of the observer. Light moves at about 300,000km/s to the observer. If time dilation occurs due to a strong gravitational wave, the 300,000km/s isn't what changes. The length of that second is what changes. Even an outside observer, affected differently by time dilation, would see this 1 second pass either more quickly or slowly than the inside observer. Nonetheless, once both observers observe 1 second having passed (which could happen at different "times"), to them, the photon will have traveled roughly 300,000km.

[@Leonardo-G]

Itami Shikura Speed of time doesn’t make any sense. If speed is distance/time, then how do you square time so that you get the distance?

[@DrShikura]

@@Leonardo-G well, the initial subject of the comments was refresh rates. Refresh rates are also a measurement of speed. You might say that a processor with a higher refresh rate than another would be "faster." That does not necessarily mean that the processor is traveling through space. If light can only move at 300,000 kilometers per second in a vacuum and we know that nothing else can move any faster in the observable universe, does that not have implications on how quickly events can transition from one to the other? This unseen constant would theoretically be the refresh rate of the hypothetical processor that simulates our universe?

[@oumuamua7029]

No,I think it's Planck time (5.391...× 10⁻ ⁴⁴second)

[@shingamba]

The universe is moving faster than light. So no.

[@hunterperformance3424]

how to move faster than light ... run in a dark room

[@lotus9484]

DAPPER DAN GAMING/ASMR sir... GJ

[@hunterperformance3424]

golf clap

[@camfg8908]

Jajaja xaxaxa

[@goldenfoxa1810]

if the room is fully dark with no light in it then you're not faster than light because it's not there

[@lonewalker5446]

I can move faster than a light bulb

[@ARouser15]

You dont see the photon. You just see the physical representation of a photon.

[@ericeaton2386]

Photons are literally the only thing you can see.

[@JohnChrysostom101]

Seeing this 12 years later

[@vatsalgandhi5089]

1:47 to 1:56 fun fact: if this was a footage of a 1500m/s (avg.) bullet, then it would have taken more than 23 years to completely cross the bottle.

[@solcoster8110]

thats insane

[@CookieeMonstarr666]

I don't get it

[@p1xel870]

CookieeMonstarr666 What is there not to get?

[@gamingfiredrago]

@@CookieeMonstarr666 He's saying that light is so fast that even in this slowed down footage, it took so little time to cross the bottle. Had it been a bullet(of avg speed 1500m/s), the slowed down footage would've been 23 years long(for the bullet to cross the bottle)

[@CookieeMonstarr666]

@@gamingfiredrago oh i get it now. Had a lil misunderstanding. Thanks for explaining.

[@Cauchypotatoes]

So I had a random thought of googling if someone had filmed light travel and found this video. A video uploaded 5 years ago. That's absolutely amazing.

[@trevionwiggins133]

Same

[@wigbe.2207]

same

[@Koutsn_]

That is not filming at the speed of light, it simply has multiple lenses (I believe 1 per pixel) so you can move the image around and focus it on the go in specialized software

[@akburst510]

Did you know that they have managed to "freeze" light for moments?

[@JimCim78]

like with "the force"?

[@BhardwajAditya]

The thumbnail is showing a light effect. If I scroll up, the upper edge of the bottle gets a reddish colour and if I scroll down it seems that the thumbnail has become larger for a while (having a reddish colour at the edge).

[@lovingherwasgay]

WHY would they keep the bottle's etiquette on 🙀 it's literally interfering with the view of the thing they're trying to catch on camera

[@azwill7615]

50 years from now we will have 1Trillion fps phone cameras

[@MelloSav]

Az Will lol That would be insane

[@ElFly]

Az Will that would be useless on normal phones

[@Dirty262]

Several years ago you would have said the same about a normal camera on a phone.

[@azwill7615]

true

[@igidj7281]

no you wouldn't

[@nsb2021]

You guys are smart enough to do this but not smart enough to take the label off the bottle for better observing

[@piusminj4533]

M0NSTERPR0 sponsoring

[@ayushs6099]

Chris Daldy-Rowe They must have asked you before doing the experiment

[@chrisdaldy-rowe4978]

If they had of asked you..they would have used plumbers tape lol

[@ScientificReview]

Do you think they are lying?

[@muhammadsafiullah51]

M0NSTERPR0 Coca cola sponsored them

[@christopherleubner6633]

This is like a solid state version of an ultrafast camera called a streak camera. Used one of those to watch the detetonaton wavefront through shape charges that have been doped with a bit of tungsten dioxide in combinaton with a pulsed x ray source and an intensifier tube. Pretty crazy to be able to photograph an explosion at about 0.2mm per frame.

[@riley8209]

??????????????????????

[@Dionisus97]

I’ve clicked for the slow motion, but stayed for the explanation. Very fascinating.

[@swayam5216]

The camera is gonna run out of storage faster than speed of light!!!

[@jaboibrodie1687]

@We're Lost try 186,000 miles/second

[@thanoscube8573]

I hope they don't make a black hole

[@yingxiawei821]

@I smell the cheeses in my future it will run out of storage at 666,420,069

[@jdraptor6439]

😂😂😂😂savage

[@borispankov638]

@@jdraptor6439 so this is lie?

[@theboss9600]

one trillion frames per second *Me : watches 0.25x*

[@trannynanny5440]

Damn underrated

[@Mr.Tom_69]

😏

[@cybervillager]

i.e 4 trillions per second 😂

[@Itsshaunbewarned]

If you wooosh or call me a nerd or say a joke flew over my head then ur an idiot loser, It doesn't work because 0.25x speed just show individual frames slower, In order to get true slow-motion u have to get another slow-motion camera and record this YT video

[@CyberSage796]

@@Itsshaunbewarned delete the first sentence and your comment will be funny. People who don't understand the sarcasm can fuck themselves, and so do you

[@cheese8520]

So what are the implications of time in this experiment? For example, how much time does it take for the photon to travel to the apple from the perspective of the photon?

[@cooperchipman5003]

If Google is correct, it takes literally no time from the perspective of the photon.

[@SonGoku-by3uy]

The light already reached the bottle cap when u saw it at once, as it will also cover the distance to reach the camera to get recorded.

[@adampizzi8870]

By the time you see any light in the movie with the coke bottle the light beam has completely passed through the bottle and is out of the shot. What you are actually seeing is the light that bounced off the coke bottle and ended up inside the camera's lens. The camera can only record light which comes in contact with it's sensors. So if you think about it you are not exactly seeing how light propagates through an object. You are seeing how this scene directs light toward a lens overtime.

[@RBZ06LT6]

Thank you! Thats what i tought. People need to question theirselves a bit more!

[@Synday]

Adam Pizzi hello captain obvious. seems like you passed elementary school! congratz

[@DJxTriKz]

Synday Wow, you replied to a year old comment and tried to be a smartass. You came off as really cool on the internet. Good job.

[@jmoa5758]

Facepalm. Yes, but that is irrelevant as what was intended is achieved anyways.

[@Stryker1297]

Justin Moua not necessarily face-palm. Some people probably didn't get that. It's a pretty helpful comment

[@imspartacusss]

They use one trillion fps but they show this on a simple coca cola bottle.

[@mostpassiveuser8904]

Yeah that's disappointing. Imagine a glass kaleidoscope there.

[@ScientificReview]

Because this camera is sponsored by coca cola!

[@mostpassiveuser8904]

@@pravakarpal3060 it's a presentation to generate excitement for the research.

[@hars-bh4pl]

@@pravakarpal3060 I'm just annoyed that they didn't peel off the sticker

[@davidreed4713]

I feel like they used something familiar so you could see the experiment with a familiar scale

[@amir2880]

why should the camera get the light all the way before the target point

[@quichrlyn]

"our light source is a titanium sapphire laser" 0:55

[@lecturesbywalterlewin.they9259]

Spectacular!!!

[@letsmakeit9710]

Lectures by Walter Lewin. They will make you ♥ Physics. How it possible , because we see only with the help of light photon but when actually photon are slow motion then how can we see any picture or shot because already light are slow down hence time traveling of light also slow down If you have any idea please explain me -Question from indian

[@woowooNeedsFaith]

+let's make it You don't make any sense whatsoever. You ask somebody to make sense of YOUR misunderstanding of the whole thing, and of course that can't be done. How this "virtual camera" works, is explained at 0:26 - 0:42. There is no slowed down light involved.

[@alisoltani2425]

Oh Walter Lewin is here🤗

[@spoonkey]

Spiderman

[@davidhatcher7016]

Yea

[@kyledilbert6424]

I absolutely love how when a new achievement occurs ,everyone starts to rant about how it's fake and all

[@tr-8r417]

I invented a carrot, that's slightly less orange, "FAKE! It's photoshop!"

[@rochelimit55555]

It's old, it's already around since 5 years ago, and yet this is the only video showing light in slow motion.

[@GroovBird]

No, it's not. It's the only video that became popular. I did some googling, and I found the following page: www.mit.edu/~velten/press/content/

[@rochelimit55555]

***** Thanks for sharing Dave, but I know that page with the apple videos and the door video, and that is the same exact page I saw 5 years ago. In fact all of those videos are actually in one single lecture by the Indian-looking guy. which I heard exactly 5 years ago. I don't know why they haven't created any more of these in a 5 year gap, was the camera too expensive? was the camera broke? was it fake? not sure...

[@GroovBird]

I don't think it was a specific type of camera. I think it was an experiment, like a one off. Reading the document, I'm also convinced that what we see in the videos is not "real" but is based on the information that is captured and then rendered. The whole thing is called "computational photography" too.

[@vishwajeetprasad1729]

Now I understand why Derek said that it is measured the speed of light in a round trip. I was totally confused back then that we can measure the speed of light in one direction

[@andikest331]

So does that mean the camera shutter is faster than the speed of light itself? because it can record the slow movement of light? Even before the light reaches the point of the camera lens, you can see moving light

[@fredirecko]

Every MIT phD student is a potential James Bond villain

[@archismanchakrabarty9752]

Wait, that's accurate.

[@maheshguptha9796]

Hahahhahahaha true

[@sinnyjohns4362]

Or love interest if you're a woman

[@BioClone]

The only difference is how you get the funding ^^ Credits: 👨‍🔬 No Credits:💀

[@johnmcdermott2551]

Yeah but they'd be CIA. Cash Is Almighty.

[@Kolega_Koprolitego]

2020: We are able to record light 2100: selfie with mr. Light

[@iyoyoyoyoyoyoyo]

*2012

[@aaravgavshinde1296]

@@iyoyoyoyoyoyoyo Seriously 2012?

[@iyoyoyoyoyoyoyo]

@@aaravgavshinde1296 yeah look at the time this was uploaded

[@aaravgavshinde1296]

@@iyoyoyoyoyoyoyo You mean "2012" instead of "2020" ? Yeah, you are correct!

[@palashneema4855]

@@aaravgavshinde1296 nope it’s 2011

[@HeNiityearsago]

You know you've been living with an Indian dude for too long when you adapt his accent

[@Paydonsb]

Good job guys. This is awesome work you all have done

[@naminogiri]

Can you film the double slit experiment?

[@Bibibosh]

naminogiri the double slit theory was a hoax to try and get people into quantum mechanics!

[@RPTRxCrosshairs]

Source please?

[@ynvch]

Filming a delayed choice quantum eraser would be nice too.

[@johnkelly8135]

LMAO!! Nicely said...

[@bretmeeker3224]

@@Bibibosh Please, please elaborate. You owe us all an explanation with that reckless statement lol. Not even saying you're wrong, I'm just curious

[@nyclposter]

They should film the slit experiment......should be fun.

[@squidwardo7074]

nyclposter What is that?!

[@notherNappaghost]

recording it would cause the probability waves to collapse back into matter. so what we would see would be a single linear movement path rather than the wave interference that its famous for.

[@BlackMesaEmployee]

nyclposter 😱

[@teovinokur9362]

Yesss

[@heron7869]

nah wouldn't work

[@michaelarbach]

PLEASE - I am dying to find out.. If you point the laser directly into the camera (going through the bottle), will the camera capture the light from a distance before the photons (or waves) reach the camera? I would love to see this camera measure directional/inward/outward light speeds, as well as measuring light speed through different vacuums, gases, and atmospheres. I would also love to see photons being captured going through two slits. Could you achieve the same visual effect by filling the room with fog?

[@toudertmenouar3943]

After 12 years, KZbin finally found me worthy to give this recommendation. 😅😅😅

[@thomaspollock391]

we've had this for over 5 years and nobody is talking about the fact that we can take slow motion video of light? this is an incredible invention!

[@th3smurf692]

But only in a Lab setup. Because the light has to be switched on and off, because the camera only captures a line and therefore only a source from a Controlled light can be used. Not to mention the Lab conditions

[@thersten]

I learned advanced physics from reading KZbin comments. apparently that's where all the PhDs spend their time.

[@realdeal5712]

Lol no. Only uneducate idiot like u. 99% youtube comment are taught at highschool and many more are bs

[@ansh6370]

PhD? Pizza hut delivery?

[@jmb9040]

PhD is a Doctor of Philosophy

[@gunnarolafur3691]

JMB r/woooosh

[@mhkuntug]

Painfully Howling Dog?

[@JoseMartinez-kg4gy]

How is the camera capturing photons emitted from inside the bottle faster than the photons take to move through the bottle ?

[@OddBr18g]

I don't get it . The camera needs the photon to go in to get a pic . How can you say it takes a pic of a passing photon ?

[@madmatmp]

The Slo Mo Guys will need one of these 😆

[@Mrgranturismo4ever]

I bet there's only a handful of these

[@pyroguyman096]

Honestly, what would they film with this that wouldn't just appear to be standing still?

[@Dani-yd5mb]

Fck Yuu well if you watched the video, it's a few cameras that trigger at a specific time then all pieces put together. if you had good timing with a few phones, you can do it urself

[@TheElvisnator]

100,000 $ - 10,000,000 $

[@vaporii]

Holy crap no, they would be indestructible.

[@neikoo7785]

How many terabytes does 1sec take to capture

[@neikoo7785]

For them to capture it they will need to start the camera before the light and if that's the speed of light well then it will take up storage

[@wooferjr169]

probably a few kilobytes or 2 megabytes

[@RivenbladeS]

AllNamesRntAvailable i believe that 1 trillion fps is 1 trillion frames per sec. say an inage is 2mb. 1 trillion inages is 1 trillion × 2×1000. if the video is 0.0000001sec you just divide the previous with 10000000 or 10^7. so it would be 100.000.000×2 or 200 million bytes or 200 gb.correct me if im wrong

[@wooferjr169]

rivenblades Yes you're wrong lol it'll be just a few megabytes.

[@wmconorbrown]

1 trillion is a huge number. If you slowed 1 second of footagee down to 30 frames per second, it would take 1057 years to watch the whole second.

[@sofastealer0253]

Light is so epic if you start a rave without him the lights won’t work

[@InternetListener]

Hi from the future. The only photons I see are the scattered ones not the ones traveling through objects. Any updated for an actual application of this imaging system? 12 years almost later...

[@web276]

A white guy with an Indian accent is more impressive than the light

[@necron7436]

I thought the white guy had a facewarp filter on in the middle.

[@Vishnu_Karthik]

PRETTY SURE He's brown

[@anurag11112]

He is an indian....

[@rameshchandra-gh5pk]

You are not aware from Indian talent

[@raleiariel9271]

web276 arabic "white" people aren't uncommon

[@Hawxxy]

This video was sponsored by Coca Cola.

[@dimi3978]

lmao

[@shingamba]

This video had no Coca Cola written any where.

[@mjames2117]

Shit overpriced soft drink

[@fadymilad434]

@@shingamba r/woooooosh

[@johntu1967]

And Apple

[@chapterleo8351]

These are the people who know the difference between physics and quantum physics !!

[@Esteban-mv4kc]

si un chip lee en forma secuencial pixel a pixel y en rgb es decir tres veces por pixel y eso en un arreglo y los electrones se mueven mas lento que la luz como es posible que algo lento vea a algo mas rapido

[@aadarshroy2000]

Anyone thinking that Ramesh is from IIT is wrong . He received his undergraduate degree from College of engineering,Pune😁😅

[@anuj8825]

वाव । ... He must hv won some olympiad; that he got into MIT.

[@FullMetalChains]

@@anuj8825 he is a teacher not a student. You don't have to win Olympiads to become a teacher

[@ARNABROY-hz7re]

I m also in pune university , lol that doesn't mean that I will also go into MIT 😂

[@aadarshroy2000]

@@ARNABROY-hz7re I didn't told it.I just cleared that he is not an IITian and he is a faculty member of MIT .

[@rahulkalyan267]

How you know him

[@daiduongdaviddinh140]

I was expecting to see photons flying at slow mo. 😠

[@knytlite]

You did

[@VercilJuan]

You just did.

[@knytlite]

@@VercilJuan I think maybe that was the joke lol. I'll just go ahead and r/wooosh myself out

[@willsonjohn9179]

Photons can't interact with photons 🙄

[@mikemanthe]

willson john thank you! You cannot *see* photons. You can only see things that can effectively reflect light (photons). Photons are the source of ‘seeing’ - it a chicken and the egg thing...

[@gittyupalice96]

Light: I am the FASTEST in the universe! Camera: check out my 3 stage nitrous kit Light: need bigger turbos D:

[@jochenstacker7448]

Light would get a speeding ticket from Einstein if it did that.

[@janithsachintha3620]

And that’s ladies and gentleman is proper ray tracing 1:50

[@Mr3344555]

When science reaches it's Epitome, they use coca cola plastic bottles to measure light.

[@kirjian]

The problem with being faster than light is that we only live in darkness.

[@yashashviraj4251]

Oof size: •small •medium •large✓

[@rudrayanraha6709]

Philosophy level × 1000

[@Manideep6557]

Oh

[@improvingguitarist1595]

Actually, being faster than light means you can see the light in front of you

[@rudrayanraha6709]

@@improvingguitarist1595 nope in back of you

[@RobotCentral]

Would love to see this applied to the double slit experiment and see what happens.

[@davidharrison5246]

0:29 camRAAAAA that is not one camRAAAAA.

[@Elisei_]

Lol

[@calciumfree9626]

For lazy people 1:47

[@duckpomegranate7710]

CalciumFree 무칼슘우유 thx

[@davidmoret5150]

CalciumFree 무칼슘우유 thx my dude

[@keenanmillard2534]

CalciumFree 무칼슘우유 you a saviour

[@ismaastro7661]

Thanks dude

[@marcell2638]

You mean "impatient people"?

[@starvetodeath123]

Ya did it again, MIT!

[@awoodenspoon1023]

love your name

[@arttupyykko1556]

+A Wooden Spoon i love your name

[@omnigulwillofcrota6189]

+Arttu Pyykko hello person from almost 1 year ago, how are u?

[@Jerei1]

C6H6

[@brahimbajrami8988]

#SlimQ lol

[@tpark9988]

I am wondering, if you look directly into the light source coming at you, how would it look? Just a flash of light when it reaches the observer(camera)?

[@marymccluer1630]

Impressive! How would light imaging of the body differ from ultrasound? Could there be some special application for it? Thanks for sharing this video.

[@ThisGuyDrives]

I’d like to know exactly what’s in KZbin’s algorithm that it thinks of me and says, “I got this video from over 7 years ago that you’re are going to LOVE!”

[@mohitthorat8580]

It could be that the people you follow or the people KZbin has clubbed you with like these sort of videos

[@sirlyon3333]

I mean, its better that they at least bring things back up from the catalogues than forget them for eternity

[@Lambda_Ovine]

Well, did you like it?

[@geli95us]

@@MyChannel-bh6sc yeah, I don't know why the age of the video should matter if you enjoyed it

[@yahaaa1343]

I know why it was recomended for it's sci content, i consume it reularly. But , why now and not earlier ? For me that's the whole point.

[@grisha1528]

I watched this at 0.5x speed for extra details

[@TheRedRaph]

2 Trillion Frames per second.

[@ralphpeteranderl4063]

Yes, makes all the difference!

[@algeria_online_fair]

And what's the result?

[@priyaj5283]

@@algeria_online_fair check it out yourself..

[@Ydv_Saurabh26]

You genius

[@s-sugoi835]

How did that light reach your camera lens before it reach the end of the bottle?

[@Naitikrathore014]

I got this recommended after 8 years 😂😂

[@chiggen_wings5703]

9 years

[@personalizedinternet1047]

10 years

[@ThePieMan305]

I play Skyrim at 1 trillion fps

[@anshpathania1816]

ThePieMan what did you pc smoked?

[@thecostarules631]

A trillion faps

[@johnf.kennedy]

i play skyrim at 1 quadrillion fps

[@labermichnichtzu8003]

Yeah regarding skyrim: Bethesda has relaunched it a trillion times already.

[@bster3168]

I play fallout at 100000000000001

[@nuclear8817]

Fun fact: The multiple camera array technique they used to film this is the same technique that the US used in the 1950's to create extremely high speed, extremely high definition recordings of nuclear weapons tests. You should check it out. There's a video here on KZbin titled *"First milliseconds of nuclear bomb test."*

[@IDMYM8]

Nuclear ok i'll do that

[@dsolis1352]

Nuclear

[@zakman246]

Nuclear

[@mcbarnhart]

Not unless they exploded a bomb every trillionth of a second. Listen carefully- the laser is pulsed, and they shoot just one line of the video on each pulse. The video is a composite of partial pictures of a huge number of pulses

[@ZerinZarinZerin]

Yes, you're right.

[@Yourmomma568]

how does the camera pick up light moving between objects slower than the distance to and from the camera and its light source?

[@valtearalte0657]

it's 2023 and this just came up on my feed

[@RayNow]

Explanation: it's impossible to see a beam of light the same way we can see a bullet in slow motion. We can see a bullet only by catching the light it reflects, but a light beam will not reflect or emit light, it's completely invisible unless it gets directly to your sensor, and then it disappears. They try to make it look like the bright spot travelling in the coke bottle is the equivalent of the bullet travelling through the apple, but it is not: the moving bright spot is the reflection of a spherical light pulse emitted by the laser against the side of the bottle and back at the captors.

[@atmbm5261]

Nice one, you copied a one year old comment. Congrats

[@user-ue3gx8nu1t]

you legit copy and pasted that

[@Bevsworld04]

RayNow soooo what you're saying is that we are seeing the paped of light?

[@elmerynxat6187]

Damed Ass..!! LOL

[@Droe9667Pantera]

Light beams emit light lmao, how do you think we can see a Lazer pointer in the air even when it's not directly pointed in our eyes

[@morning5tarr]

*Still faster than my internet explorer.*

[@mysticdragonex815]

Me: *_laughs in Google Chrome_*

[@kimjongun2383]

@@mysticdragonex815 me: laughs in mobile data

[@smoothinterceptor8452]

Edge is the new king

[@RayRay-uw6ms]

12 years later, still haven't found a use for it

[@firefox1294]

Why don't you record it with the camera then record what the camera recorded to make it even slower

[@sffkhlkldadsakdjalkdjas2523]

Imagine getting 1,000,000,000,000 frames per second, but then remembering that your monitor is capped at 30hz...

[@PavanSpace]

🙄

[@mendher3219]

Most underrated comment.

[@radioactivet-rex286]

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂gamer problems

[@Shaaan]

Sad liyfe

[@aasitbanerjee1955]

When you are in MIT but forgot to remove Coke Wrapper for experiment..

[@paleesteem2836]

Nice one

[@Ironbattlemace]

That's beyond awesome. This is one thing I was sure we can't capture.

[@dannysamman3384]

Could the one way actually take the full time and then the "return speed" would be instant? If I was standing on the earth with no sunlight and my buddy is at the sun when it shines a light. Wouldn't I see it coming closer which would be it's already traveled to me? and would the person on the sun have to wait for it to hit the earth and then bounce back to them? Or would it be complete darkness and then light instantly just arrives? Or am I thinking about this wrong?

[@mikesanders3246]

Oh how Newton, Einstein and Huygen & Hooke would have loved to see this video.

[@cringebob965]

And stephen hawking (R.I.P)

[@marcioamaral7511]

@@cringebob965 this is from 2011

[@cringebob965]

Márcio Amaral Oh so he couldve seen this Hopefully he saw this before his death

[@mostpassiveuser8904]

They already have. That's how the speed of light is measured. Don't forget that what you're seeing here is the light that is diffracted by the air and reaches the camera. Depending on the distance between the camera and the bottle, the light you see in the image has already moved farther ahead.

[@peacematters4557]

Didnt they had anything else as test probe than coke bottle??

[@willdavis7254]

With a label, wtf?

[@Anten-Isy]

@@willdavis7254 prolly sponsoring

[@Mikehikegaming]

Merica

[@rusemode]

You didn't see the apple at the end??

[@ParthPaTeL-wm3kt]

Concept here is strobing, different plus strobe and camera sensor strobe creates images.

[@somedude4805]

Wow this was 11 years ago now? I feel so old...