Nebula Class Defends Against Keldon & Galor in Cardassian Wars! Star Trek Bridge Commander

[@cesarespinozaspain]

That weapons pod was NERFED!!!

[@TrekBattles]

@@cesarespinozaspain it was either the pod or me 🤣

[@reubenmorris487]

You'd think that huge UFO-looking weapons pod would rapid-fire like the Akira class.

[@PKPhoenix83]

It should be able to fire at least a dozen rapid fire. This is a bad version.

[@siriax1691]

@@PKPhoenix83 Nebula needs a ventral torpedo pod, six quantum replicator Sov type turrets, two lance Gal X phaser lances, and a deployable aft giga impulse engine.

[@falkwulf3842]

@@TrekBattles : WP/T-1 is the The typical Nebula Class Triangular weapons pod which canonically grants a Nebula-class additional 4 type XI phaser banks and 16 additional multi-purpose torpedo tubes. This triangular pod is a dedicated torpedo deck with sixteen individual launch systems, thus bringing the total number of torpedo tubes to 20 on a Nebula in this configuration.

[@mushroom330]

well done Maxwell :)

[@TrekBattles]

Someone has to defend us from them Cardi's .🤣

[@falkwulf3842]

Cant be Maxwell, He was on the Phoenix. NCC-65420. Plus the Phoenix was in the "DATAMINE" configuration with the high frequency sensor pod so the ship could cut through the spoon heads sensor distorting dampening fields. This ship is the USS Berkeley NCC-67420 under the command of Captain Elizabeth Haley.

[@mushroom330]

@@falkwulf3842 NEEEEERRRDDD!! You and I would become friends if we ever met :)

[@falkwulf3842]

@ LOL im sure we would.. and Yes...Yes Im a Trek Nerd have been since 1989...But honestly I have been in love with the nebula class starships since I laid eyes on the Phoenix back in 1991

[@Boseeinsteinshake]

Good flying, especially in the Galor!

[@TrekBattles]

@@Boseeinsteinshake thanks🙌

[@crownprincesebastianjohano7069]

Just like the USS Honshu, destroyed by an attack wing of Galor Type IIs.

[@ralfhtg1056]

Kompressor beams? What is that? As far as I know the Cardassian ships use spiral wave disruptors as their beam weapons.

[@TrekBattles]

Fire up the game, and see for yourself planetside.firenebula.com/startrek/tech.php?techfam=4

[@falkwulf3842]

@@TrekBattles I get what your saying however the Trek Tech Manuals and the actual show Deep Space 9, Call the spoonhead beams Spiral Wave Disruptors.

[@TrekBattles]

@@falkwulf3842 maybe, I'm open to the fact that they can go by two names. It's not an either or situation. The game from which this gameplay comes from call them compressor beams, as does star trek armada too.

[@chow-chihuang4903]

I’m surprised the Nebula class equipped with a weapons pod has only four torpedo tubes. I would have expected it to be able to spam several torpedoes at a time from the forward-facing launchers, because from the graphics, it looks like it has ten of them (four per angled side and two in the center).

[@TrekBattles]

From a game POV the stock Nebula mod was only designed with 4 tubes 2 forward and 2 aft. But outside of the game you're right that the pod would have allowed for more tubes.

[@bridamy]

those tactical analysis were WAY off. Need to add a bunch of 0s to the ends of those ranges and speeds.

[@TrekBattles]

The tactical analysis are accurate for the mods that you see on screen

[@bridamy]

@TrekBattles so accurate for ranges and speeds in game? Ok because in real space, those numbers are way way off of what those ships can do.

[@TrekBattles]

@@bridamy you know you're watching gameplay of star trek bridge commander right? Games aren't canon, so if I use a mod that has 4 phasers in game. But the canon version has 6. Which one gives more context to the content you're watching? The in game version or the canonical one