Negative vs Positive Displays: G-SHOCK Comparison

S5600 carbon and titanium G:
amzn.to/3f2HClY
G9000 Mudman:
amzn.to/3aFXPdk
Full Metal G:
amzn.to/3bIMWca
5610BC:
amzn.to/3aEQYkn

[@tententock]

All, one thing to note is that if you have a solar battery then you won’t run into any battery drainage issues with a negative display. So that’s one way to get the best of both worlds :)

[@CoxaBranca]

I was going to post about this detail, but now I can just agree with you.

[@AlexanderLebedinskiyVC]

This is not how LCDs work, though. The display is basically the same, only the polarized layer on the top of it is different.

[@happytravels2480]

I’ve had many negative display Gshocks. They look cool but it’s a strain to read. I ended up selling them all and swore never again.

[@mrbacchus6127]

I had that same mudman, I swore no more negative displays.

[@balobreached]

A Casio display is built up of a few layers, what makes a display negative (or positive) is the orientation of the polarising filter in relation to the liquid crystal. What causes the legibility issue is a number of factors, first being the size of the numbers when in negative, and the second being the reflective film behind the crystal and how much light it can reflect back to the user through the polarising film whilst at a negative orientation. The polarising film they’re using on certain watches might also be different, as well as general factory application being different between watches, as the effectiveness between displays generally can vary dependent on how accurate the orientation of the filet is in regards to being positive or negative. Sometimes when it’s slightly out, it can cause a faded appearance. Sorry if tldr, I love this stuff

[@Manic97LP]

And the display technology plays a role too.

[@steven3379]

I've been waiting for this type of comparison for a while now, thanks much! Nice watches too!

[@Lee_K_5555]

No question in my mind that negative LCD displays look cooler. I think there's a great amount of disappointment experienced by owners who look at photoshop-brightened catalog photos and compare it to the reality of a negative LCD display. That said, the STN technology utilized in the displays of newer G-Shock models is a noticeable improvement in clarity and legibility. I don't know if the square metal G that Adam features it or not (it's hard to tell from Casio's product literature) but my guess is it does have STN.

[@lucacadianalbert]

yeah it's a love and hate relationship for many. I dig some of them depending on the model. I love the negative display on my GMW. Another square that has a very very nice negative display is the 25th anniversary DW-5025D - it's had a gold tone which is rally rad! At the end of the day I say, variety is the spice of life :o)

[@rhettbaldwin2148]

Totally agree! ... negative is where its at, for sure. I only like positive if I want a retro vibe. I have a bunch of Gs and squares and actually find I like the red negative most now. In fact even out of my higher end Gs or even Swiss mechanical pieces, this little red eye cheapy gets some of the most wrist time: DW-5600MS-1DR. Throw on some JaynKays bars and GOOD to GO. I love the red and the green digit backlight ... and its like driving a cheap banged up car, you just dont care! its so liberating!

[@MrPleers]

Yes. I not a fan of negative display. Ask yourself...would you like to read your books printed with grey letters on black paper ? I don't care about stealth. I'm not Batman.

[@quintonrichards4805]

To each their own; that actually sounds like a sick book if it was white text.

[@amostech5820]

Discovered your channel and digging your videos. I am gonna get my first G Shock and was a bit worried bout the legibility of a negative display, but for a lot of models that come with one, I do agree that it only adds to the clean look.

[@ianmaw66]

The GD-350 has one of the best G-Shock negative displays, although probably not as good as an STN display for the GPR-B1000 Rangeman.

[@lsimpson50]

I have a 5600E and a 5600BB. I love the stealth look of the BB on wrist, but if I want to tell the time I wear the E. There are just too many lighting conditions where the BB cannot be read. Two handed (back light) is not an option I will accept. I'm considering swapping the modules to get the black BB case look I like with a legible dial. Casio claims the battery life is the same: two years.

[@BAR-ct7ti]

Casio dramatically undersells the battery life of their standard quartz model. I’ve heard claims of up to 11 years.

[@RobertGaron]

Did you do this?

[@doofy28]

I prefer negative but enjoy positive just about as much. Thanks for the content.

[@hendrikaschermann1213]

G-Shocks are easy to convert from negative to positive. I did it with a GW-B5600BC. The result was great, abd if you want to sell the watch, it can be easily changed back to original.

[@RobertGaron]

Plz share how. 😎✌️

[@mercifulone7065]

I believe function over fashion. I used to think negative displays were pointless. Later I realized negative displays make it easier to read the hands on analog-digital watches. Question: Does the light function/button emit less light on negative displays? If so, it could be useful in maintaining light discipline.

[@abegranderson4253]

Yeah, the subtle negative display does kind of keep one’s attention on the hands. Good point.

[@ajmprovidence]

You've been solving Mysteries with that Pencil Thin Mustache Adam?

[@tententock]

ajmprovidence loool

[@av8orAH64]

My Casio Men's GG-1000-1A5CR Mudman has a negative display, which at the time I bought it I did not know that I would be unable to read about 80% of the time. I figured, I will use the back light to get around it. Nope, no back light, just and LED that shines across the display from one direction offering no contrast. I guess as a older pilot, I don't care as much about how I am perceived. I am more focused on being within =/- 30 seconds on my navigation, which means I will be on time, every time. You gotta see the screen to make use of it. MIP displays are a great option.

[@marfg12345]

I bought a negative m5610 a few months ago and I can barely read the time in anything but bright sunny weather (even then it's often difficult because of glare from indirect lighting) and strong overhead direct lighting. I ordered a positive m5610 and I'll probably end up selling the negative.

[@liambmn]

I am in the exact same situation. I love the negative watch but it's not readable half the time. Did you end up selling the negative 5610?

[@VishnuZutaten]

With the MIP display I'll say : NEGATIVE ALL THE WAY traditional LCD...i understand the cool factor :)

[@strannostrannovasrr]

I like the negative display also better than the positive alternative.

[@Chrishagen]

Just got the basic 5600bb and the negative display is super clear!

[@avelinoribeiro]

Best negative display GD-350 love it.

[@shanemiller5598]

Absolutely agree with this comment. At the same time, it's now the only negative display model I'll own from G-Shock, and I've had a few. Positive trumps negative every time for me.

[@casekocsk]

"I would recommend getting both" My wallet doesn't agree...

[@pinokio3785]

I just bought my 1st watch, the gshock gst w330, It has the dials, and 3 little negative displays for date etc. I was like wth I cant almost see that display even in bright light. After 1 day Iam happy with the negative display, because like you said, its not in your face. People that see my watch think it has only the dials. I find it better like that lol, seems kinda more like a mature watch, yet sporty.

[@pinokio3785]

I thought the watch was broken because the display wasnt that clear, turns out there is positive and negative displays lol.

[@stephonjames1038]

Thank you! I have the 5600bb and 5600e. Bb is so cool but hard for me to use as a watch. I wear my E way more because it functions better as a watch. If I had to pick one of the 2 I would select 5600e positive display.

[@bladesskate3954]

how has your experience been with the 5600e, i was thinking of buying the 5600ue as my first gshock?

[@stephonjames1038]

@@bladesskate3954 5600e has been fantastic. Cant go wrong dropping $40. I like the 5600ue look so much. I like it more than the Solar 5610. Would love to have a 5600ue!

[@stormrider1119]

Thanks for the video man. I have the Rangeman triple black and find it fine, I love it in fact - did a few light level videos on my channel with it... Cheers

[@samuelgomez974]

Check out the dw 5600bb, many people think of that as an outstanding negative display, i think it even has an slight edge over the gmw 5000

[@sethnovatt1166]

Just got a 9500-3. Totally cool look, but the display was impossible to read in anything other than direct light. Even indoors under natural light it was almost invisible. It might be a cooler look, but personally, I'd like to see the time on my watch!

[@BAR-ct7ti]

Everyone is wearing smart watches with a dark face or negative displays these days. It may be cooler now to go with the positive displays. When everyone else zigs…always zag.

[@ernestoechevers4741]

For me they both have a place and time in wich they shine, for me at a jobsite or tool aplicacion positive display all day and night and for fashion the negative is the way in most cases exept when you want a vintage twist 💪😎👍

[@davesummer2552]

Thanks for your video. I’m definitely getting old but this is the first I’ve ever heard of “negative display”. I bought one from Amazon and thought it was broken. They sent me another one, exact same display that’s barely legible. I guess I get it, you want to hide the fact that you’re wearing a full digital, cheap ass watch but the negative display is a dumb way to do it imho. I now have to return both of these dumb watches to Amazon and go buy one in person so I can actually SEE what I’m getting.

[@xchalibur77]

That’s why I love my frogman,for the positive display. Although build quality had a big decision too. But I bought a Rangeman too even if it has a negative display because its cooler than its big brother The King

[@tententock]

xchalibur77 wow killer combo! How do you like them?

[@xchalibur77]

Well the frogman I can’t apart with, just suit’s me better but the rangeman its the watch that I admire for its roughness it’s so much of a watch, so large and tall , when I wear it, it doesn’t pass unnoticed. And this is it’s strength it’s like he’s always screaming I’m here I’m here😅

[@BmwolotlE90]

I didn't notice this when I bought my shock mudmaster in store 😔 now I notice it everytime I look at the watch especially it's got a dark face and the dark display makes it harder to see too especially at night

[@andyjazzsax]

What’s the point of having a watch that you can’t read. Isn’t the whole point being able to tell the time at the very least!!?? Bonkers!!

[@TerryHesticles]

Even with my younger eyes, a negative display isn’t worth it.

[@jaysterling26]

I think you're being too negative about the negative displays...isn't that a positive?

[@aswin_sudarsan]

The g900 yellow version with that negativity display is a killer☠️

[@markhouser8367]

There's definitely a bit of legibility hit, but honestly the only time it's ever really bothered me is when trying to photograph the watch. Other than that, hasn't been an issue. (Talking about my GW-9400, olive Rangeman.)

[@jimmyjay122]

I prefer the look of the negative displays. Especially on the metal black squares. Any idea if that GMW5000 TVA comes with a negative display?

[@jaredharris1970]

I have a negative display g shock I’ve had no problems reading it indoors or out I guess it depends on the lighting conditions meaning if your workplace has led lights or fluorescent lights and how strong the lights are a brighter indoor light will cause more glare at my job the lights aren’t as bright they are florescent which happen to fade in intensity over time and if u give them a tap they brighten up

[@VerangaF430]

Can you do a review on the gmw-b5000 black... Just wanna know how it held up? Cheers

[@alexandrueftenie9834]

I really like that mudman G shock.

[@thetylife]

I think you'll change your tune when you get older and eyesight starts to go.

[@whoknows8678]

Yeah, get another 30+ years on those young eyes and see how you like any negative display. LOL I think they're seriously cool and look awesome, but I just have a much harder time reading them at a glance over a positive display. I'd love a "big square" King of G version with a positive display, but I haven't been able to find a model made by Casio.

[@adsagp]

Yes, I totally agree with you. Although the negative display looks cool, I'd have my Rangeman 9400 with the positive display any day of the week for liability.

[@adsagp]

...auto typo, for legibility, to see it easier!

[@Shadowwalker1717]

Negativ is crap. Never ever.

[@deecarter147]

GD350-1B has a very bright gold digit negative display.

[@Conflictofinterest902]

I bought the gd350 1b last week after loads of researching. It’s the clearest I’ve seen.

[@jefferyneu3915]

I am loving my full meta Square. I will never again get a negative display model.

[@antevrankovic4539]

Thx for the vid!

[@Geotubest]

Thanks. Very helpful.

[@deepapo]

I don't why they create so hard to ready negative displays. They look good though

[@Ecksterphono]

That negative display looks horrible. Looks like a damaged bleeding liquid chrystal display

[@churblefurbles]

Probably the worst is the silver on white background baby-g, which kind of looks milky. Oddly the pink limited edition with silver digits is quite legible.

[@RexakonGaming]

thoughts on the gw-9010mb edition negative display? Thanks

[@tententock]

extremely difficult to read in low light

[@TwitchPubao]

CASIO cost down on some G-shock models, I have two same gd-100 negative displays, one is very legible the other is not.

[@garyk4017]

The negative display G-9000-3V is much easier to read than the G-9000MS-1. My best negative display G is the GD-350-1B.

[@LemonWatermelon]

Always thought positive for goodboy negative for badboy look

[@twintech100]

Hi, where is your sidekick!? When is she coming back. 😳

[@tententock]

Twintech100 I’ll get her back in soon

[@williamhauser3686]

I absolutely hate negative displays. Absolutely useless without a good backlight.

[@rozsgyi]

That mustache broke the internet for today :)

[@OdinsCloud]

Absolutely silly. Eyesight 20/15 and one time tested at 20/10, so I can see! If you actually use your watch in tough places as it is supposedly designed then this is a problem, a big problem too. You need to be able to glance and go. Diving, kite boarding, windsurfing, on my off road motorcycle, mountain bike, hiking etc... This sounds fine for metro-urban-explorers.

[@venkatesh6404]

D350 best negative display is best ever

[@davidfarnell583]

Yeah I have a ga110 but its near impossible to read the digital display and of a night you can hardly even tell the time very disappointed

[@alexandredesmonts35]

It's simple : you cannot simply read shit on negative display lol

[@damiankowalski4839]

Positive better.

[@kendesjarlais7577]

Stealth means nothing if you can't read it

[@stevem5945]

Anyone else see a dude behind his right shoulder around the 3:30 mark?

[@RandomRobReviews]

First

[@juanfor3182]

The square looks ridiculous on you. They look super small on your wrist. You need a mudmaster

[@Sardar.Asad77]

The negative display watch looks more rugged and futuristic