Which LCD is best? Negative or Standard?

Negative or 'Reverse' LCD displays are very popular across the digital watches on offer today, but are they better than the more traditional standard LCD?
I thought I would measure the actual viewing angles and find out which wins for legibility and clarity, and by how much.
Watches tested here are -
CASIO G-Shock GW-B5600BC-1BER
CASIO G-Shock GW-M5610-1ER
Here is the link to the GWB G-Shock (my pic for most features for least cost) • G-Shock GW-B5600BC = M...

[@biscuitsalive]

By the way I just did one of these including the new MIP negative display type- kzbin.info/www/bejne/iJipho2woZ2knbc

[@robertbidochon7949]

thank you ! :)

[@captainrogers2542]

@@robertbidochon7949 Are you kunjimani?

[@robertbidochon7949]

@@captainrogers2542 I am your father.

[@captainrogers2542]

@@robertbidochon7949 wtf man. Are you kunjimani?

[@captainrogers2542]

@@robertbidochon7949 I am sure that you are kunjimani. Tell me if you are kunjimani.

[@kmf1392]

I have one of both. The positive display is so much easier to read from any angle compared to the negative display. Negative display just looks so badass though.

[@KaiStarlet]

Agree.

[@bidhrohi12]

Same. Agree.

[@Chrisb8s]

At night with the auto light. The negative is easier to read

[@angellazarus]

Its about priorities, to look cool or to read the time without squinting.

[@Phoenix-King-ozai]

Nice one

[@Admiral_Bongo]

I still can't choose.

[@alponselrik]

i'll pick to look cool anytime. i mean watch is a piece of jewellery. if you want to tell a time, phone might do a better job nowadays

[@uuuultra]

I look cool naturally---I don't need a watch to help with that

[@biscuitsalive]

To be fair Clint Eastwood squints all the time. And he’s pretty cool. ;)

[@Ilestun]

Negative looks way better. Positive is better at everything else.

[@markusisy2904]

Ganz meiner Meinung

[@Phoenix-King-ozai]

Lol

[@esvegateban]

Blasphemy.

[@Atombender]

My thinking.

[@poochypoachy240]

Red negative 👌

[@aldo9923]

I got the negative display recently, idk about everyone else but I tend to look at my watch straight on if I’m checking the time and I’ve had no problems reading it. Great watch and I prefer the look.

[@noegmad]

Same whenever people say that at certain angles u cant see it, yeah its true but i never look at my watch from weird angles i flip my wrist parrallel to my face

[@Avaddon911]

Aside from low light conditions I definitely agree. I worked nights for a little while and I noticed the negative display was terrible at night, in a parking lot for example. However the backlight solves this problem so it's not a big deal. Either watch is perfectly fine if you ask me.

[@zen933]

@@noegmad Exactly. Even with mechanical watch I always flip my wrist to see time rather than try to see it when the watch arm is extended to do something. The only benefit from the better viewing angle I can think of is if you try to let someone read your watch screen

[@stormrider1119]

I love the look of the negatives but practicality wise the positive just has to take the biscuit. Fantastic video and ingenious yet simple method of testing. Great work...

[@biscuitsalive]

Thanks. Yep I think I was just confirming what everyone knew. But nice to see it in numbers to be sure.

[@pablorages1241]

Standard is easy to read ... but Negative is cool !

[@jtaka1453]

We all know which has better legibility. However, I watched the entire video and found it very engaging and informative. I really like objective and scientific approach you used. Great job.

[@JvD1985]

I had both and I also had the steelseries (STN display) You can see the negative display just fine (in daily use) BUT you have to look 0,5sec longer.. I think that when you only wear the negative display (STN or no STN) then you will get used to it. But if you are switching everyday, then the negative seems to be more unreadable. But still.. negative is still easy to read, if you look a 0,5seconds longer. The brain has the get used to it.. Sorry for my bad explanation and grammar, but English is not my language.

[@uuuultra]

My head hurts reading this

[@lassehagman6941]

I assume GW-B5600BC-1BER is non-STN? How does the readability compare to a steel negative STN?

[@mygamingchannel8555]

@@uuuultra lol

[@MemerDad]

thanks. makes sense.

[@RudraJMore]

Thanks man. Btw does the first copy watches have dimmer screens or they just use the same tech? I saw a first copy one yesterday night in street light, it felt very unreadable and too dull for a digital watch.

[@storm3016]

Good show, thanks for this. I've always stayed away from negative displays even though I prefer the look and have wanted one since forever. I think this was convincing enough to just go ahead and finally get me one.

[@presterjohn71]

I used to love my negative display Casio but as I have got older and my eyes have got less sharp coupled with switching to varifocal glasses the Negative display has become a no-go for me. I miss the coolness of the negative display but the normal display is a heck of a lot less hassle.

[@uuuultra]

Time is money

[@jijoious]

Negative = conversation starter "excuse me , what's the time now" since he/she barely see what's o'clock on your wrist 🧐

[@jimmybrava2810]

Wtf lol. She has a phone

[@jijoious]

@@jimmybrava2810 her phone run out of🔋juice🤭

[@yorusuyasoul69420]

I wear my phone

[@thewonderer9551]

😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@franzmuller9058]

Und dann kann man sie selbst nicht ablesen. XD

[@paulcooper8818]

Casio should allow positive/negative display via a menu option

[@ImTheWildAngel]

It doesn't work like this. It's not a digital option, yet.

[@TheChico868]

Its hardware

[@breastmilkgaming]

@@ImTheWildAngel i think he meant casio should have +/- display version for every watch while buying online

[@Subideable]

If you had an original gameboy or gameboy pocket non colored, you were able to adjust the contrast of the screen. Casio can definitely add this feature.

[@vituMind]

You have reason. In this watch Suunto you can invert the display via menu: kzbin.info/www/bejne/naSmhZdsdpqgsKM I don't know why Casio doesn't add this feature in all digital models.

[@rowdyron4111]

Excellent presentation, and the drum solo was sick!

[@biscuitsalive]

I wish I could claim credit for the drumming. :)

[@maxb3k]

@@biscuitsalive You could give us a reference to the drummer :) I would enjoy listening his other solos

[@morganthedruid1]

@@maxb3k kzbin.info/www/bejne/Y4apoWd-bJybfM0 here you go

[@JusttheWatch]

I can't believe I haven't come across your channel before! This is really helpful, planning on picking up a dw-5600 series and have been wondering about this very question.

[@biscuitsalive]

Nice to hear my test was useful. :)

[@donilofreedom692]

No one else will see my PRECIOUS TIME on my NEGATIVITY WATCHES MVA-HA-HA-HA!!!

[@ChrisLoew]

Денис dannythedarkel_com the best comment, love it

[@Phoenix-King-ozai]

Haha

[@tube4waldek]

Yeah, not even you.

[@sumitbiswas5478]

@@tube4waldeklol 😂

[@ianjones8386]

The jazz drum solo made this video so much better! Been playing jazz my whole life. Thank you!

[@3vamtb]

💥 That was fire lol!

[@anthonyiodice]

I just like the way a negative display looks. I’ve never had any trouble reading it in any circumstances, and it gives me all the 1980’s Sony Hifi amp display vibes I need.

[@ryan93civic1]

Standard all day. I own both and my negatives are a pain unless im outside in the sun. Indoors there a pain

[@liaubadar1824]

I like both. Haha

[@xpusostomos]

@@liaubadar1824 but are your negatives the new g-shock Bluetooth? Because they are way better than most negatives

[@syedahmed1387]

*they're a pain

[@tube4waldek]

Exactly my experience with my Pro Trek.

[@aashutosh9285]

Lol this helped a ton thanks man

[@artyohm4810]

This test is awesome! I massively respect people like you who put the time and energy in make a vid like this. You hit the nail on the head at the end of this video by the way: you kind of choose between form/looks and practically. I'm torn between 5500bb and 5610 (positive display). I prefer the look of the 5500bb but 5610 beats it from the functional point of view. Anyway thank you for this video I found it really helpful.

[@Alberto.LIS.Morais]

There's is something very strange on KZbin videos... I think there is an I.A. putting some dislikes on videos like this... The tittle is very clear. The explanation is very clear. Why would someone put a dislike??

[@biscuitsalive]

Haters gunna hate. :) Jokes on them. Dislikes add “engagement” points. So if you dislike a vid it’s more likely to be recommended to someone else. Like and dislike is exactly the same value to you tubers.

[@biscuitsalive]

I have thought about this lots before. It is strange. I think different people use the like/dislike in very different ways. For example. A news article in a video maybe negative or sad. Some would “dislike” because of the story the video covers. Some would “like” because they appreciate the video maker bringing them the story. Even through they dislike what’s happening. Some people simply don’t think about the creator of a vid at all. They react only on content of the content. Another example - Perhaps someone just ordered a negative display watch. They see this vid and don’t like the result. They react to the “result” of a test. Rather than the efforts of video creators efforts. So yeah. Likes and dislikes are weird AF

[@Alberto.LIS.Morais]

@@biscuitsalive you make your point, but that's why there is the comment box... the like and dislikes should be about the way the content is presented... Ok. Some times is a good video but we don't like the content, ok. Put it on the comments, to help video makers, to improve their content.. we all benificiete on a good vídeo...

[@jefferyneu3915]

I am now glad I have the GW-B5600-2ER arriving in 2 days. A friend had an older negative display G-Shock that was horrible. The technology has come a long way since then. Mostly, I am looking forward to the new module. Thank you for a thorough comparison.👍

[@PfarrerHerzblut]

Wonderful! Thank you 😊. I thought, that the differences would be much more, but the inverse display watch is a newer model, and Casio has become better with their negative displays recently.

[@MrJamesJamesJr]

Its kinda neat how the thumbnail led directly into the video. I'd like to see more of that on youtube.

[@bunberrier]

The tilt viewing angle is the most important but they always show just a left right pan in the adverts online. Ive been disappointed several times by watches that need a precise wrist rotation to view the time, usually due to the display but sometimes also due to a very recessed face with a protective ridge around it. Always preferred positive and now I have the science to back it up. Great video.

[@D__Lee]

I've got the standard LCD Casio DW5600 which is my swim watch. I was thinking of getting the negative display, but I was curious about being able to read the negative display while underwater or while turning between laps. Although your review didn't directly address my question, it did answer it. The standard display would be better. THANKS FOR THE REVIEW!!!

[@patricj951]

I have several G-shocks with as well positive and negative display. There are moments when I want an easy readable time and then positive display is the choice(except from GBD H-1000 Squad). But the negative displays are so cool!

[@8Junio76]

I have the exact negative display model. It has never been a problem to look the time.

[@explorerextraordinaire5472]

Welp there you have it folks

[@Digital111]

It never was a problem, it just has a much smaller angle of visibility compared to positive, like this video showed.

[@explorerextraordinaire5472]

Much smaller angle of visibility ≠ problem, @@Digital111 . If it was a problem, then you would have something to talk about, but you don't so essentially you could shut up, and contribute the exact amount of wisdom you just contributed 👍

[@Digital111]

@@explorerextraordinaire5472 Exactly

[@THunt-ss4hy]

@@explorerextraordinaire5472 how about piss poor performance in anything less than perfect lighting conditions?

[@MicroAngelo1]

I like the look of both, but really really love that drum solo!!

[@sped6954]

I only have one negative display watch, and it's a customization I did myself in about 15 minutes or so. It's on a base model G-Square, the DW5600. While the bezel was off, I decided to also remove its white print and I swapped out the chrome buckle and tongue with a black set. Personally, I love how it turned out, and it had exactly zero learning curve. While I was lining up my polarizing film, I found the point where it was in negative and had the brightest segments, then I backed it off a few degrees to darken the segments a little. If I thought for one second that I could do it successfully, I would replace the chrome pushers with black ones, but I already know that I don't have the manual dexterity or the patience for that level of detail. I'm pretty sure I could remove the E-clips and replace the pushers, but there's no way I'd be able to reseat the clips. I decided to leave the lettering under the crystal alone. After I had everything reassembled, I installed a black JaysAndKays BullBar. Again, I love how it turned out, and it gets more wrist time than all of my other watches combined.

[@carl.44magnum51]

Great video! Thank you for taking the time to investigate this for us. I did not know there was a problem with the Casio negative display until KZbin told me…. I have always enjoyed both types of displays.

[@GFWatch]

The most scientific tests on watches viewing angles I've seen on KZbin. Oh, Bothly got me there 😄

[@alexr.3919]

This was exactly what I was looking for. Thank you.

[@biscuitsalive]

Glad it helped. I did an update with the new MIP display option. See that on my channel.

[@randomguitarnote8887]

That drumming though...

[@Lo-Fi-Go]

I know man, it's fekn great. Any idea who it is?

[@randomguitarnote8887]

Lo-Fi i wish i knew man.

[@jimmybrava2810]

Sux

[@simba9725]

I have both the the GW-B 5600, but I have the GW-N5600U with the upgraded module and screw back cover. Love them both, plus I have the GW-9400 Rangeman.

[@natertaterz335]

(3:25-5:42) Drummer here 🖐️ Just admiring this beautiful n' peaceful drum solo! I can definitely fall asleep to this haha!

[@zackamanda9799]

I have both of these watches. I actually have over 125 Casio watches and G-Shock watches. I prefer the look of the negative display , especially when the display is in various colors.

[@milanfrank]

Nice presentation! Although for me the main pain point of the negative displays is the amount of light needed for it to be legible. Perhaps an experiment #2? 😊

[@INFIN1TY-]

Just buy both, both he's holding and you have the best of both worlds.. both are pure beauty.

[@thorbjrnhellehaven5766]

I remember inverting the didplay of my calculator in (I think it was) 7th grade. I don't remember exactly, I believe we flipped the polarizing filter upside down. For other displays, I guess it might be possible, if you are able to taka apart the layers of the display. Everyone had different colors on their calculators, and I think it started when someone wanted to try to swap the keys between two, to get a different color scheme.

[@andresantosferreira6498]

Congratulations by the kind of test that you performed. Very helpful. Although many people claim that the 5610 with the negative screen is worse than other negative GW models.

[@pinch-of-salt]

Always felt that negative displays were for aesthetics not really for practicality. Thank you for quantifying it in this video.

[@ewliang]

Was going to aim for a negative, but thanks to your awesome detailed comparison video, guess standard is the way to go for me. :)

[@ykcinasak]

When I was a kid the one of coolest thing was to reverse polarizer on digital watches :). Now I see it is biznis plan :)

[@blackcat4589]

how?

[@ykcinasak]

@@blackcat4589 same way kzbin.info/www/bejne/aXa4mZqMmr-VabM

[@12ent12]

That was very helpful, I appreciate it. The negative display just isn’t my cup of tea. I love the standard and your test even proved it even more.

[@Patelivision]

Damn I've always seen people say the standard lcd is better but this is the first time I've seen someone attempt to actually measure the difference.

[@biscuitsalive]

My thoughts too. I’m a nerd. I like numbers. :)

[@henrycheong6709]

Legibility between the positive and negative display is slight, but from the tactical point of view, the negative display is preferred as it does not give away your presence when someone is looking in your direction.

[@TripAstute]

Great test and video! I definitely prefer the positive screen, but the negative does look slick. 😎

[@ankithmistry]

Negative puts more effort and struggles to get reading quickly

[@geopapa80]

I finally ended up buying the negative version of the 5610 with the combi bracelet. It's not a problem after all if you like the look. I was expecting it to be worse.

[@gilesrobertson9974]

Great testing method. I prefer the positive display, for legibility and authenticity to the original DW-5000C.

[@kiwicory100]

I liked that someone quantified this. I have both and rationalize the negative display as a stealth thing for when you are feeling stealthy. You don’t need to make the knowledge of time available to a bystander hoping to catch the time off your wrist.

[@opticwiddly5263]

I live in the desert which is very sunny the negative is way more visible in the brightness of the sunny Sunday

[@Gagasng]

What about at night?

[@opticwiddly5263]

@@Gagasng that's why it's got a light at night you need the night

[@Gagasng]

@@opticwiddly5263 ah you're right

[@mikejaques4702]

I just found an answer to one of my biggest questions of childhood. Which screen is better? Now i know. Thank you for scietific part.

[@jdraven0890]

Not silly at all! I'm impressed that you found a way to measure it objectively.

[@wbwarren57]

Finally, we know the question for which 42 is the answer!

[@biscuitsalive]

XD “The ships hung in the sky in much the same way that bricks don’t.” You’ve reminded me I need to dig out my Douglas Adams books again.

[@mercifulone7065]

Function over fashion. I dislike negative LCDs. Thanks for the excellent scientific contribution!! Edit: I just realized that negative LCDs could be better on analog-digital watches to make the hands easier to read.

[@Scott-M1]

I agree with most here. Negative has the cooler look, but the poorer visability. Also, what about the battery on negative? Always felt it was using more artifacts of the display than the standard does?

[@watchingdanny]

Your graph colors should be reversed as the "negative" display is darker and vice versa. But great review and technique. With the auto backlight, I think the difficulty in viewing the negative display are mostly irrelevant. For the stealth look, I think it's worth the minor inconvenience in the situations where the light might not help.

[@paradacostamiguel]

Not a silly test at all. I think about doing the negative display mod on my new casio F91-W but now I think it's more functional with the standard LCD. Thank you for the demonstration!

[@praveenp]

It is actually a 'hiding time from nearby person" feature.

[@UniversalLearnerMPC]

Hiding from the self too😂

[@dami007]

Yeah, a very neat feature if I must add. Hate when all those pesky folks come over to me like, ‘hey mate, can I get the time?”. Some even take the piss and actually lean over to read my time! Arrant nonsense!

[@uuuultra]

Everybody has a cell phone tho

[@NathanChisholm041]

I haven't has a person ask me the time in 15yrs or so!!

[@IvyANguyen]

Thanks for the test. as someone who is visually impaired, I was concerned about the offerings of some of the Casio watches being only Negative display as I never owned such a watch before. I'd rather have whatever I'll be able to see best. So it seems like traditional positive display wins out. The negative display looks cooler but does seem to sacrifice clarity.

[@biscuitsalive]

Im glad my silly test actually is helpful for real world situations. :) good to hear, thanks.

[@jerryg50]

Depending on the type of use of the watch determines what I would prefer. I have both. I have some watches were I bought the same model with one using a negative screen and the other being a normal screen. Then I can choose what I want... It is obvious the regular screen is a lot easier to see and use than the black screen. We can say the negative screen is more of a private type of watch.

[@foveonyc]

I also liked the negative display combined with the black body, but until then, until I saw a positive one with backlight! GWX-5600WA-7JF. The result is a light body and a bright display! Super! Excellent Work!

[@5150cdr]

Hey! I hear Betula Lenta (Shahar Haziza) in your video! Great drummer. Also your review. Thanks.

[@markthibault8579]

Great review! I would love to have a positive 3459 module in my GW-M5610 as I prefer positive displays. Until Casio offers this option, I put the bracelet from the GW-B5600BC onto my 5610 and have been happy ever since.

[@ryboxer]

Bought a negative just for a change. Took it back after a week as it was more difficult to read.

[@thetwopointslow]

Wow man. The entire internet watch community has been desperately needing this video for years. Bravo!! Sense of humor is on-point as well

[@AbhishekSingh-fd1ss]

Great info . That is exactly what i was looking for . Unfortunately , the model that i liked did not have a positive display , so had to settle with the negative display one .

[@oceansurfplace]

Small point still: The neg display Bluetooth watch can be configured for a 4 sec backlight. WIth the tested pos display watch, the backlight time is only 1.5 sec. I find it difficult to read with 1.5 sec backlight. Just my 2 cents.

[@biscuitsalive]

Yep agreed. 4 secs feels just right. Less seems annoying.

[@Mr.M1STER]

I have positive and negative display g shocks and I nearly always wear the positive display ones. In most normal indoor situations the negative displays are just not very legible. They are great outdoors in direct sunlight but in any sort of lower light situations I find myself tilting the watch towards a light source to read the time. Positive display all day for me.

[@bzmudaifyd]

For me legibility is one of the cool factors so by that margin I’m not going to get a negative display. I have the GMW5610, it’s hard to beat if you live in an area where it syncs. I wear it to bed every night and it’s always dead on accurate, no effort on my end. In my opinion all Casio would have to do to make the perfect gshock is update the classic colorway of the gwm5610 (with the red ring), adding Bluetooth, “pm” indicator instead of “p”, ability to set backlight time, a vibe or sound alarm, and current time in the stopwatch and timer modes. They should release it in the classic color, all black, clear urethane, and the combi bracelet. I emailed them this information previously so I hope they do it.

[@MrBl3ki]

They did p. much everything you've asked for with 5610U

[@MemerDad]

@@MrBl3kiit doesn’t have bluetooth

[@metallicarockacion]

Amazing test! congrats to your work!

[@enigmarocker]

Thank you so much so making this video! You have really helped me. Honestly thank you

[@jfilm7466]

This is by far the best comparison I have ever experienced in watch videos. Thank you ❤️❤️

[@biscuitsalive]

thanks! Literally just uploaded a new G-shock vid by the way - kzbin.info/www/bejne/rZuYn4SFmd-Vgdk

[@IAmNoeyes]

Nov. 30. Just picked up a Neg veiw screen G-Shock like the one you have in the video Been using the standard one for 20 years.

[@xdejablu3x]

As of this date, 58 people don't know how to tell time...Great video by the way. I prefer negative but depending where I'm working and the time of the day, the standard will suffice.

[@indiananupam5715]

Excellent review mate. Best video on internet. Negative vs positive... Thanks

[@EffendiChung]

For me, a negative display should always come with tough solar. Most of the times you need that illumination to see the time and illumination drains battery. Looks cool, but as an adventurer I will always use a positive display on my watches.

[@alexv1265]

Well if you think about it a negative without solar could mean more adventure

[@markypea]

I've got a GXW56 coming, and I was looking at inverting the negative to positive, but you made me feel a bit better about the negative display. Maybe it'll be okay. Negative displays are nice for dual analogue/digital watches, but pure digital just looks wrong, in my opinion. I've got a dual display Seiko Sportura SNJ005, and that would look awful with a positive display.

[@RodCornholio]

If I want that 1980s look - the positive. For that slightly shady, a bit calmer, modern look - the negative. Fuckit, I always thought the negative ones looked like the LCD broke and liquid spilled inside. I'll take the 80's.

[@tronkel1]

I chose the negative display not because of the display itself per se, but because the positive display model has no bluetooth. If the normal display model had had bluetooth, I would in fact have bought that one instead.

[@patrickwhite8144]

I have a negative casio and under most lighting conditions the screen is very readable. In dimly lit rooms I either look a bit harder or activate the light on the watch. This trivial level of inconvenience is more than worth paying for the added coolness of the negative display.

[@alanchua7131]

Personally i prefer positive as I believe negative displays are much harder to read. But after purchasing the Gwb5600 AR im actually impressed by how clear the time is. I dont kniw if its just me but some negative displays to be precise the gwb5600 series have a 'BETTER' negative display as compared to other 5600 series by casio.

[@mercifulone7065]

5:10 does the negative display emit less light? If so, it could be useful in protecting night vision & light discipline.

[@fervent2896]

"testingssszzz" I can tell you had fun making this video

[@mudgutsiv]

I like the date on the "negative" display watch shows it in the traditional "English" format (day/month) rather than the "American" (month/day) format. Its the one feature on all the G-shocks I've owned I wish I could have changed.

[@biscuitsalive]

Yep the Bluetooth models allow you to choose which way it goes.

[@LazyScoutJace]

I bought a Timex Ironman that was negative. After driving away on the highway, I realized I couldn't read it with my arm on the steering wheel. I immediately returned it and never went back

[@provideogears3178]

Same here totally agree

[@KhalidAlFaris-kh3pe]

Thank you for your time, effort, and clarification 👍👍

[@jerrymandarren]

Negative is best overall for looks and makes it stand out less, in a good way. I have zero visual problems.

[@fabiosemino2214]

I've had both a Fenix 1 and a Fenix 2 and the positive LCD (and white backlight) are the only thing I missed from the Fenix 1, I had to tweak contrast a lot in order to read the display at night while running, never had to do it with the Fenix 1

[@si7271]

Gracias, estuve buscando este experimento por todos lados , 🙌👏 excelente video

[@fermin4065]

Positive for me always.

[@Vari86]

Awesome video!! The final review I was looking for. Thanks!!!

[@thebarak]

Very well done. And some really great bebop drums.

[@vincentjack735]

Negative is pure style. Love it more. Love using my back light

[@Letaq_]

Gwb 5600 has auto light function.Helps a lot.It is turning on during the day,if you are in some dark room

[@UncleJessie86]

04:57 you can change the amount of time the light stays on. I believe it is by holding the "LIGHT" button for a few seconds.

[@jackzhang5431]

Very interesting test. Can you do this test between digital display and mechanical watch?

[@biscuitsalive]

You mean a analogue display and digital? Too many parameters. Zillions of different handsets, dial colours glass types (domed with distortions etc) Different materials. Lume. Etc etc. At least with digital LCD there is only a few basic types.

[@JohnTaylorDev]

Got both, love both, still can't pick a favourite :)

[@biscuitsalive]

It’s certainly a nice problem to have isn’t it. :)

[@raksh9]

Very cool testing method. I wonder how much difference, if any, would you see with the new STN negative display like in the full metal square?