Рет қаралды 10,435
🙋🏼♂ Have Questions , Need Help Fixing, Troubleshooting, or Learning More about FPV?
Join 'The Hangar' 🛩 my members only community - you get:
💰 Affiliate Program
🎁 Members Giveaways & Promotions
🎓 All my existing & new Courses
🧰 All my workshops (live & replays)
🧑🎓 All my Tutorials
📋 All my Guides
📺 All my Videos Add Free
🎬 Directors Cut Videos
⏰ Bench Time Live Hangouts
🤝 1:1 Help/Support
‣ Go to DarrenFPV.com to join or learn more
🔗 www.darrenfpv.com/the-hangar
If you feel like building a 5" Freestyle Drone is too hard, you just need the right guidance.
So, I built a course with 71 highly detailed but simple modules, breaking down absolutely everything! They're can't be anything missing, if there is, I will add it. Revealing the Secret Behind a $54 Flight Controller That Could Revolutionize FPV
In the complex world of Flight Controllers (FCs), it's easy to believe that price indicates quality. However, a $54 FC can deliver performance on par with a $139 one, shattering all misconceptions. The secret lies in the processor, a detail that could redefine the FPV (First Person View) landscape and challenge skyrocketing prices.
Commonality Between Everyday Technology and Flight Controllers
Flight Controllers, the brains of our drones, hold an intriguing secret. The processors they house aren't solely used for drones. In fact, they are present in everyday devices from smart watches, digital cameras, home automation devices, to modern, computer-augmented cars, and even military precision-guided munitions.
These processors, or semiconductors, hail from companies like ST Microelectronics, the producer of the STM32 micro-processor, akin to Intel Core Processors in our computers. This line includes the F411 (the i3), F405 (the i5), and the F7 (the i7). As we continue to computerize our world, demand for these processors surges, naturally causing prices to skyrocket.
The Game Changer: The $54 All-In-Flight (AIO) Controller
The real game-changer is the processor and the ESC in the $54 All-In-Flight Controller. These components come not from STMicroelectronics, but from a company called Artery. This controller uses the AT32F435 processor, in comparison to the STM32 F7 Processor used in the $134 Flight Controller.
Comparing STM32 and Artery Processors
Although one might assume that an F7 is superior to an F4, it isn't that straightforward. Consider the STM32 an Intel Processor, and Artery as Apple’s M processors. The Artery F4’s processor is 28% faster than STM’s F7 and also 70% faster than STM’s F4 processors.
However, STM’s F7 has double precision for Floating Point Units (FPU), meaning it can do math with more decimal places than the Artery F4. This makes it tempting to assume that the STM's F7 processor would be better for something as precise as flying an FPV drone.
Why the Artery Processor Outshines STM for FPV
BetaFlight, a drone flight control software, limits the Gryo and PID Loop Frequency on our Flight Controllers to 8,000 times a second for the best gyro. Some of the newer gyros run at 3,000 times a second. The STM’s F7 and Artery’s F4 processors can handle much more than this, with the Artery F4 capable of handling a PID Loop and Gryo running 32,000 times a second.
These numbers indicate that both processors are not being used to their full capability in FPV drones. As such, selecting a flight controller with an Artery processor from a different company, without any performance limitations on paper, allows a 60% cost saving without sacrificing performance.
Real-World Performance and Compatibility Challenges
Of course, paper specifications mean nothing if real-world
performance falls short. Regarding new technology, there are bound to be some practical issues such as drivers and BetaFlight compatibility. Similar challenges emerge when transitioning from Intel processors to Apple Silicon in computers. It will take time for BetaFlight to fully implement Artery and iron out real-world differences.
As of now, BetaFlight 4.5 is slated to integrate Artery. Despite the initial issues, the potential benefits are substantial, considering BetaFlight has been using STM processors since 2015.
The Future of FPV with Artery Flight Controllers
This exciting development could significantly impact the FPV drone landscape. If Artery processors live up to their paper promises, they might become the new standard for FPV drones, heralding a new era of affordable, high-performance flight controllers.
In conclusion, the $54 Flight Controller's secret lies in its Artery processor, an innovation that may save FPV from its cost constraints and open a new chapter in its evolution. It's an exciting time to be part of the FPV community, as we stand at the brink of a technological revolution.