New Air Defense RIM-162D VS Garpun (30mm) & JRNG-6 CIWS | Air Defense Comparison

New Air Defense RIM-162D VS Garpun (30mm) & JRNG-6 CIWS | Air Defense Comparison | Modern Warship

Рет қаралды 15,496

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 45

@DestructSean 6 ай бұрын

The RIM did really well. I’m testing it thoroughly on all my ships. I feel like it’s a great option, like the JRNG and Crotale.

@wahyuwirawan727 5 ай бұрын

Rim could replace crotale.

@DestructSean 5 ай бұрын

Agreed.

@sleep_deprived_stormworker 4 ай бұрын

so the RIM is the best for anti aircraft, but the JRNG is best for missile defense.

@robertusmaharyady2810 6 ай бұрын

Lot of work to make this comparision.. thank u brother.. Cheers... ❤.. When compare one by one.. jrng and rim clearly good.. But same result like before.. In the simultaneous condition garpun looks better 😂... Jrng have a tendency/focus to shot the plane.. While garpun and rim like more allround switching neither plane or missile.. and have faster missile reload...

@sherlyoctavianyputry 6 ай бұрын

*Hyunmoo-3C VS Maritime Strike*

@pgch0089 6 ай бұрын

Hey Cakrabirawa, I really enjoy your comparision videos - the test setups are well chosen and the videos are professionally produced! If you don't mind I'd like to make some remarks / suggestions. 1) I think that the missile vs. AA game mechanics involves some random factors or some other non-deterministic behaviour, that factors into chance of the AA shooting down an incoming missile. For example, the comparison of RIM-162D vs Croctale showed an incredibly bad performance of the RIM versus the Black Plague (over 30 seconds), while the same test in the comparison video RIM-162D vs Garpun / JRNG-6 passed in just 11.4 seconds, winning the first place. So maybe the same test should be repeated several times (for example 10 times) and the results should be averaged to give a more meaningful assessment. Of course this will require a lot more time for these kinds of tests, so maybe that's not an option. 2) Beside the missiles fired by enemy ships, the AA should be able to handle incoming aircraft attacks as well, especially since many of these missiles cannot be flared. Maybe you can add additional tests, with aircraft firing missiles at the AA testing ship, one test with the aircraft staying out of range of the AA and one test with entering the AA range. Because I got the impression that most AAs focus on the planes once they locked onto them and completely ignore incoming aircraft misiles. 3) In most tests against the X51 Wavewrider, the damage still is applied to the ship although the missile was destroyed. I made some tests myself (Varyag as attacker vs. Massa over 10km) and got this effect only in very rare occasions. Is this effect a ping issue? And finally a test request :) I recently started using the T2 OSA-M AA on my Massa an got the impression, that it performed better than T3 AA (Croctale / Garpun / JRNG-6). It has an extremly fast reload of 1.75s, locks on multiple targets and the damage of 325 is enough to destroy any T3 missile. The low range of 2.77km reduces the chance of locking on enemy aircraft, focusing on incoming missiles. I would really like to see a comparison vs Croctale and JRNG-6. Cheers and keep up the awesome work!

@ksa1crypto613 5 ай бұрын

hey thanks , rim 162d vs crotale R440 ,,,, crotale R440 vs jrng-6 ciws

@Lexypizy 6 ай бұрын

JRNG still my fav AA, cause cheap hehe

@4rya7_1Cvx97Nw 6 ай бұрын

There is no expectation that JRNG CIWS can be superior to Garpun considering that the two are at different levels

@Naraveya000 6 ай бұрын

test pan spatial redrum air defense please

@gowther10commandments33 Ай бұрын

How you turn on after burnner

@dianasaparani5904 5 ай бұрын

Your try air defens cortole vs rim 162D please

@juneedd_5858 6 ай бұрын

Can the garpun test be repeated? because what I saw was that the plane flared its missiles twice, so garpun was in last place

@namluong9739 6 ай бұрын

thats the consequence of reloading missiles too fast that in some case Garpun can not use its missile appropriately. Moreover, Garpun's missile didnt have good maneuverability like JRNG or RIM152D so its really hard to fight against highly maneuverable targets

@Ramzan95MW 6 ай бұрын

Which is better?

@Dog_watcher 2 ай бұрын

Why pay more? JRNG good enough

@Xprodude 6 ай бұрын

I dont get it why is jrng better than garpun even tho rarity of them is a difference legendary and epic😮

@zzz1041 6 ай бұрын

Cuz its dollar item

@StarLinx9740 6 ай бұрын

well tbh man i think dev just dont know how to made different in the same tier so they just slap Rarity to weapons, planes, Ships etc because they dont know where they gonna put it so Rarity doesn't matter it just thing to lure players who dont know to buy it ... just look at Pyotr Velikiy they Flag Ship(dev are russian) but it just stuck at Rare Rarity for no reason

@slazengercom8817 6 ай бұрын

Coz you have pay to get jrng, u got it?

@namluong9739 6 ай бұрын

Do Yamato or Missouri (legendary rated) stronger than Massachusett (epic rated) ? Of course no Thats the answer

@wahyuwirawan727 5 ай бұрын

Old items like garpun always power creeped by newer items. Amongst old items, garpun is a legendary tier but not amongst the newest items. Another reason is, garpun is a free item while other items are paid items