New Battlefield Details ► Locations, Factions, Maps, and Features..

[@mskywalker0725]

Pls bring back team switching and 5 man squad. Also instead of nato bring back multiple factions like in bf1 but just my opinion

[@mikeyplayzwrld]

You mean like BF4

[@mskywalker0725]

@@mikeyplayzwrld no bf1 had multiple countries

[@mikeyplayzwrld]

@@mskywalker0725 Both did but BF4 makes more sense in this case since this game is based off it

[@D32music]

I agree

[@mskywalker0725]

@@mikeyplayzwrld oh my bad I was talking about lots of factions in general but I get it

[@ethanspringer8190]

If the battle royal happens, AND they execute it properly, I think it has the potential to be super cool. If you can get a squad to play with. But I just want the classic battlefield feel. I’m skeptical but cautiously excited for the new battlefield.

[@Targon999]

I played BR in call of duty for a few hours and I think it's absolutely boring

[@ethanspringer8190]

@@Targon999 it’s only fun with friends doing stupid stuff otherwise I completely agree

[@Targon999]

​@@ethanspringer8190i played it with friends ;) of course it's fun to chat with them, for me it's just so dull to sneak around for most of the round and in the end try to stay alive as long as possible. I want action.

[@ethanspringer8190]

@@Targon999 hence why base battlefield is better haha isn’t that why we’re all here?

[@Darknova591]

Yeah and besides BF has to adopt now.

[@Favoki]

Both Bad Company 2 and Hardline had locations set in the USA

[@AQDuck]

4:40 Battlefield 2 had 3 maps set in the USA in its "Armored Fury" expansion: * Midnight Sun * Operation Harvest * Operation Road Rage Fun fact: If you look up the theme song for BF2, you're probably gonna get Armored Fury's loading theme as first result despite being the last expansion it got. Also I'm pretty sure BC2 had at least a couple maps set in USA

[@avhound2]

I'm glad somebody from the Battlefield 2 era chimed in, because I was going to if someone had not. I keep telling this kid that he needs to look farther back than battlefield 3, which is where most people pick this series up. 🤦 Your BF2 representation is much appreciated. 👌🫡

[@JesusDoesHisNails]

also everyone forgets Hardline ;( Where literally every map was in the US

[@ThargoidKiller]

I see avhound2 already replied, but I too am glad the old school BF2 ( I'm older; I go back to 1942 as well) players are speaking up here!

[@yaraelpoof7242]

BC2 did have at least one map set in Alaska

[@towersj6132]

Battlefield 2 and 3 had a few maps in the US. Most of Hardline is in the US. Also fun fact, Flashpoint was supposed to be set in California before they switched it to South Africa at the last moment

[@emreergen5433]

Hope they deliver this time! We’re craving for that classic bf experience!

[@Bigcat726]

I Kinda like the factions are more country based, I would like to see more than just US and Russia, I would like to see China again, French, British, German, Spanish, india, Australia, Canadian, etc

[@totalguardian1436]

@@Bigcat726 Well the PMC can consist of many nationalities

[@mskywalker0725]

@@totalguardian1436 yeah but that will just be 2042 again

[@mskywalker0725]

@@Bigcat726 yes I would want that too

[@Bigcat726]

@@totalguardian1436 yeah it’s alright but I like to see these countries with their countries uniforms to give off its own identity like like bf1 did and had multiple countries, their style of identity and uniforms

[@dariomasi9]

And Italy, very important and so much equipment It can add, wheeled Centauro tanks for example.

[@Cook1eSP]

You are so goated with the news I'm glad you stuck around!

[@mikeyplayzwrld]

It won’t be confusing if they name it battlefield. Just like modern warfare, everyone calls it MW2019. We will call this Battlefield something like BF2025 or Battlefield 25

[@hx20games77]

TBH i prefer BF6

[@DJNefarious447]

Battlefield makes more sense if they are doing a soft reboot and fixing the franchise, but BF6 is cooler imo

[@mikeyplayzwrld]

@@DJNefarious447 Don’t forget GTA 6 is also releasing in that time so anything even related to 6 will be focused fully on GTA.

[@Farlayy]

It will 110% be confusing

[@Sohelanthropus]

Probably Battlefield WW3 or something like that, BF6 is simpler to understand tho

[@aesemon5392]

The most Dice created bf moment i uave enjoyed was landing on the behemoth airship to take it out or bailing from it as it goes down.

[@BYTEDOT]

Man, its hard to keep up with all of this! there has been a flood over the last few days! Great video.

[@BuffaloSpring]

Same here! So busy with work I hardly have time for all of the news til today

[@BYTEDOT]

@@BuffaloSpring keep it coming I reckon! The more news the better off we all are, there's been such a drought up until 3 days ago so it's definitely a welcomed change in pace.

[@haroon4215]

alot more coming tmrw friday tom henderson doin a qna :)

[@BYTEDOT]

@@haroon4215 Oh wow okay, awesome ill have to get across it, do you know where he's hosting the Q&A?

[@reddeadcharactercreations7884]

I kinda think they should do 5 classes. BF1 was onto something with making Assault and Medic different classes, but in a modern setting I think we need dedicated engineers. It would be a cool system to bring back BF4 5 man squads with Assault, Support, Medic, Engineer and Recon. That way you won’t ever have to wonder if an Assault player is running grenade launchers or med supplies, it’ll always be evident that medics can heal and revive you and assault players have the grenade tubes.

[@sethswoodruff]

Battlefield hardline (top 3) had all of its maps in the USA

[@Whaley96]

Top 3 battlefield games? No not even close bad company 1 and 2, bf 3 & 4 and battlefield 2 modern combat are the best.

[@RogerNbr]

not a top 3 but certainly better than 2042 at least

[@dingus9316]

Holy garbage take😭

[@capolean2902]

hardline is dope wtf, hotwire was the best mode in that game which that’s where it shined.

[@scxrtii]

@@dingus9316 impressively horrible take

[@F-L-O-F-F-A]

Well if it’s indeed a battle royale leak, I think people are sorta missing that that wildfire might be the way the zones close like firestorm right? So perhaps it’s giving a glimpse or hint into that again.

[@lucagerulat307]

Nato vs pmc makes sense. I think Russia would be to much of a controversial factor at the moment. And China might make sales in China difficult. Than there isn't really any global power left.

[@mikeyplayzwrld]

PMCs always looked cooler than Russians anyways and have Russian equipment and weaponry but also other stuff.

[@Sohelanthropus]

Doesn't make sense a PMC is capable of going toe to toe with a full fledged national army It's gonna be russia and china, or if not China then Iran or South Korea

[@smellygabacci]

Iran. Bring back the MEC. There’s plenty of options. Shit I’ll take a modern day Korean War

[@lucagerulat307]

@@smellygabacci modern day Korea would be cool but again might make sales in China difficult.

[@Crimsonlupus]

Honestly the factions sound stupid, I want NATO/western allies vs china, Russia, North Korea etc.

[@Eric_Jameson]

He said it includes NATO

[@eosky2]

In the newly released concept art, the fire looks like what we saw on the map Verdun in Battlefield 1. It was surrounding one part of the map. Looks like the hill side fire in the concept art, is just for aesthetic for the map.

[@joneber7504]

Remember the concept art from bf5 same fire in the hills 😢

[@samridhyadutt5284]

In Battlefield 2042, No-Pats aren't just a PMC. They have to forcefully choose sides between the US and Russia and fight a proxy war with each other untill the US Marines and Russian Naval Infantry reach the Battlefield

[@thosedadjokestho7758]

My squad and I LOVED firestorm, hopefully they bring back some concepts into the new BR experience! No other games have a wall of fire destroying everything in its path! And destructible environments! So cool!

[@Zabijaka87]

Are people not tired of BR?

[@REDtheBEAST]

I so done with BR and the microtransaction hellscape it brought with it...games infected with flashy "skins" and not actual content that helps the game.

[@mathissveistrup3575]

I never tried. I like war, not being a hero.

[@speeder1139]

If battlefield makes a BR that's gonna be bad cause we don't need another BR the market is already saturated with it. If you don't bring something really great(not good, great) then it's gonna fail. You gotta bring something extremely unique and not a gimmick to compete against the pillars of BR ( Apex, Fortnite, Warzone). Extraction shooter are the "new" thing to go for in my opinion.

[@CobraClutch34]

I think there's a market for a more grounded BR. Everything out there now is a sweat-fest with players sliding and flying around with superpowers. I'm not a fan of extraction shooters... looting for the sake of looting is pointless to me.

[@damedash1147]

They should add the customization of soliders to the game like how the game world war 3 did for the pc two years ago

[@gerrysmith5597]

Battle Royale in BF - FFS why - leave it to the kiddies who play COD. Jeez do we NEED it???

[@rosaria8384]

I'd say private military vs NATO is more reminiscent of COD Advanced Warfare. The No-Pats are more of displaced soldiers from many nations fighting for either US or Russia in 2042. One gripe though: Battlefield V had a problem when they implemented factions as Allied vs Axis rather than specific countries, which they fixed when Japan and US factions came. Would be great if they implemented individual countries per map as a prediction. The problem with Premium is that it gatekeeps a lot of content by paying an extra amount of money. Okay, it's going to guarantee content, but for something like multiplayer, that doesn't really bode well, especially after the game's support ends. Battlefield V's new maps after launch are still populated by players because everyone was able to access them without paying for it (like back in 2021 everyone was still populating the servers without a dime spent). It's just a matter of how DICE quantifies and maintains quality of seasonal content as good as possible. We have seen the ability to drag downed players being possible since Battlefield V, but was unfortunately scrapped. Speaking of BFV, the next game should implement what BFV did in terms of movement (especially the crouch sprint + height based climbing like MWII + combat roll + supine), and probably implement a BO6 style as well. I'm sure we can all agree they'll just implement monetization. With that in mind, hot take - they should go back to how BFV handled soldier customization and just bring that back for the next Battlefield if you ask me. The 2042 system is just poorly done.

[@totalguardian1436]

It's the same in Delta Force. A coalition of countries special forces fight a massive corporation in fictional aftican country

[@capolean2902]

bfv movement system fits battlefield more than bo6 omni movement

[@totallynotretro9967]

I feel like expecting multiple maps per season is either setting yourself up for disappointment when we get less, or the quality of the maps will be poor. Multiple maps every 3 months seems like a lot.

[@shredd5705]

It's not a lot if there is Premium.... live service = bad maps, atrocious low effort skins. Because they don't have to impress anyone anymore

[@Targon999]

If I remember correctly there was a US map in an add on to bf2

[@ponraul1221]

I HATE BATTLEPASS. There should zero limited time items.

[@mekhijw15]

Would you rather a battle pass where you get access to all the same weapons, gadgets, and maps for free? Or go back to DLC packs where the players are split into those who have the maps and those who don’t on top of not having access to the newer guns? I know BP’s aren’t perfect but they are leagues ahead of what came before imo.

[@ponraul1221]

​@@mekhijw15 I’d absolutely rather have Premium and paid DLCs. Battle pass content is a fraction of what was in paid DLCs, while nickel and diming and/or time limiting unlocks. If I purchased everything in a battlepass, skins, etc. it would cost hundreds of dollars. And “splitting the player base” is a minimal issue. Every DLC from BF3 to BF1 I got for FREE during limited time events. I had to wait several months, but I’m able to unlock everything in the games I wanted from purely gameplay. With Premium, EA was legally obligated to deliver 4 or 5 big DLC packs with multiple maps & weapons each, instead of just drip feeding a few thingies with MTX ads plaguing the menu screen. Right this moment, DLC maps are in regular rotation in BF3, BF4, and BF1 and practically everyone has the DLC maps. Probably mostly from game store sales for $10 at 80% off. I’ve never believed the “it’ll split the playerbase and kill the game fast” and history has proven that right.

[@mekhijw15]

@@ponraul1221 I definitely never said it killed any battlefield game, but it definitely split the playerbase. I know that on BF1 if you have a friend that has the DLC’s then you can play on the maps but there definitely were OP DLC weapons that I had no access to. As far as BF4, I remember the DLC’s being released for free and that was great but Bf3 was absolutely the worst as far as DLC. I’m not sure if PC players had to pay but back in the day when I was on strictly console, you had to pay for the online pass just to access the multiplayer and that was absolutely horrid. I think the handling of the battlepass on 2042 was horrible but having access to all the guns and maps was awesome. Maybe my experience was different because 2042 was entirely free for me from top to bottom. But if I can earn the new weapons, I find it much more satisfying than paying for them. I DEFINITELY respect your view on the subject as far as the amount of content that comes with DLC packs as opposed to battle passes though. I just think 2042 is not the greatest example of how a well done bp can be.

[@ponraul1221]

​@@mekhijw15 It split the player base for several months at most because there would be a huge sale on digital stores where premium would end up being sold for $9.99. That's how all my friends got them, but if you paid attention with BF news, EA would release each DLC for FREE for like a week once a year for the first few years around summer. That's how I got all my DLCs, and I've never paid for Premium pass. Even if you did and waited the several months for a sale, $9.99 ended up giving you 15-20 maps and 2 or 3 dozen weapons. *$9.99 now is less than some skins in BFV or 2042.* The online pass you're talking about was that weird era in the early 2010s where you had to pay to access multiplayer if you bought a secondhand disc. But online pass was free and had a code in the game box; they eventual gave the pass for free. Pretty much all multiplayer games on console was like that. Either way my main point was that though yes the player base was split for at least several months, if you really wanted to play BF with the DLC you just had to wait for the $9.99 Premium pass sale (which happened by the next spring or summer) or the week each DLC was released for free by EA. In the end pretty much every regular BF player ended up with the DLC, and it's why DLC maps since BF3 have always been in regular rotation to this day. If the player base was truly split for very long, those DLC servers probably would have gone extinct a couple years after each game released. As for BP I have seen ZERO games where they provide nearly the value we used to get with paid DLCs and season passes. If BP provided better value, these greedy companies wouldn't have all switched to the BP model. They do it because they can sell skins that cost the same as entire DLC packs and their in-game currency. The only game I've seen with good free updates was GTA Online, but the grind for those made it basically impossible for anyone with a life to unlock big stuff without buying in-game currency. Also, you didn't get the weapons immediately once you got the DLC, you still had to earn them by playing.

[@Nitroh-]

I don't want a BR, but if they manage it properly and support both BR and MP equally and fairly, then I see no issue with it. The problem is if EA DICE would then give a Battlefield BR the "Warzone treatment", meaning MP gets lackluster support, and BR is in favor by the company. That would be a big no no. I'm not a huge BR person but liked Firestorm for what it was, even though I only got to play it maybe 5 - 10 times in total cause it died in Australia seemingly overnight, but if the next BF can somewhat replicate Firestorm while making it 10x better, I'll gladly check it out, won't play much of it but I won't be opposed to it either. Just depends how it's handles by DICE, cause it could be DOA like Hazard Zone was..

[@thewalkingdeadpig8097]

Makes me excited, but not something that I cannot wait for. I will be waiting until we see the real gameplay. Cautiously Optimistic.

[@totalguardian1436]

4:40 Battlefield 2 had

[@SynWOS]

Battlefield 2: Armored Fury Armored Fury is another paid "booster pack" for Battlefield 2, which for the first time will transfer users of the program to the United States. Electronic Arts and Digital Illusions made a tribute to their fans in this way. This extension consists of three new maps. The first one (Operation Midnight Sun) takes us to Alaska, where the Chinese army are trying to secure an oil supply. Battle for Port Valdez is crucial for the territory and largely decides on further enemy moves. The second map (Operation Harvest) tells the story of the march of the MEC troops to the capital of the United States. American forces have to stop the moving enemy and maintain a foothold until the reinforcements arrive. The third and the final scenario (Operation Road Rage) is focused on combat deep into the country. The MEC uses the highway to transport its soldiers to key factories. Defenders focus on stopping the enemy, and thus protecting civilian population centers located nearby.

[@valorf666]

Battlefield 6 needs to feature A POWERFUl A-10 Warthog, with the iconic BRRRRRRRT sound and epic, cinematic visuals from both infantry and pilot perspectives.

[@tigerleon10]

I am very hyped for the game. All points towards greatness

[@expo2000000]

BF2025 should allow enviromental modes winter/tropical storms/night maps.. and/or bring back community maps. XD

[@KevKlopper]

Wild guess: the wildfire could also be the fire of the firestorm mode

[@murcmurcy5366]

Maybe the soldier pickup will be a ranger roll. Very cool move. Look it up.

[@kevinj834]

Cautiously optimistic is me. But I feel like they’ve learned their lesson with the past 2 launches and will correct course now with Vince taking over

[@farooqamir832]

I think they need to do a mode like BR tbh. The BF community itself has lost a little faith in the franchise, so imagine those on the outside always considering to give BF a try. I think a BR that has good sound design, teamplay, vehicle play, and a destruction mechanic could really help BF flex its muscles and bring players into the franchise. Firestorm had the foundation to be an absolutely incredible BR imo, but needed a few key improvements that never came. Can't wait to see what's coming for BF!

[@Dorian_Kellum]

Seeing the clean logo on the concept art without a number, just ‘BATTLEFIELD’, hit me in a way I haven’t felt since the first images of BF3. If they name it that and actually pull this off, this will be a biblical rebirth… If. But from all the leaks, it sounds like they are making this with a well deserved chip on their shoulder. Meaning they’ve got something to prove now. I like that.

[@Mike.wazowskiiiiii]

Just like COD did a MW reboot and they called it MW 2019 , it can be simply BATTLEFIELD , but the community can call it BF2025

[@Caliburnz]

What I really want to look forward to is a weapon count to the likes of BF4 and as well as more customization like BF4.

[@daymaster1]

Personally, I think the leaks are from the PR department. It's really a win win, there is more hype for the game and more traffic to the site

[@MrDelgado559]

Why do they want to push BR so bad, its annoying

[@alanclark9729]

they should call it Battlefield Resurrection. they need to make it so good it resurrects the playerbase

[@yootchoobe]

Battlefield Resuscitation lol🤣

[@shapelesspixel]

Battle Royale is a HARD pass for me, and most everything else comes as a mixed bag. Regardless of how controversial an opinion there IS stuff 2042 did right or that was nice enough that it should be brought forward, even if only as an option for people to opt into

[@HeyManNiceShotx]

I think I speak for a lot of battlefield vets when I say levelution was always meh, and just gimmicky. It was just something to create a cool looking marketing campaign. Battlefield vets want the level of destruction somewhat similar to Bad Company. It opened up so many possibilities and interesting ways of solving a problem. Sniper killing people from across the map?...A well place RPG and that sniper is either dead or at least no longer has his nest. Do you have an entire team in a building watching only 3 entry points in a game of Rush? Screw it, switch to your under barrel grenade launch and bust a hole in a wall...instant entryway...or hell, grab your tank and demolish the whole building, MCOM station and all! It was that type of freedom that made me fall in love with Battlefield in the first place...variety, sandbox, no wrong way to play the game. Now I know that battlefield still has that type of destruction, it's just nowhere near what it used to be. I understand they had to dial it back a little since in BC2 you could destroy everything, but it feels like it has been dialed back too much.

[@CapStar362]

i just hope they bring back HOTAS and flight support, NATIVE to day 1, like every other title except 2042 featured.

[@mgt97PUN]

I would welcome frag12 But without a fully automatic shotgun semiautomatic and pump action shotguns only. Also new shotgun and rifle ammo types to bring versatility to the max. Would like to see insurgency sandstorm like realistic ballistics and TTK in an all out ballistic mode rather than a hardcore mode but don’t really handle realistically.

[@capolean2902]

hopefully aka-art comes back

[@ZING-oj6zi]

Ghost, maybe the fire in Gibraltar is a reference to Firestorm, which is BFs closing ring in their BR. I'm looking forward to a BF, modern day BR.

[@aesemon5392]

9:17 the sandstorm in hourglass was great for getting rid of campers. Take note of their postion while it was clear and they are just sitting there and go deal with them once the storm was up. Amazing how.many never learnt and kept trying to spawn from their beacon.

[@Jaap-Relou]

I want multiple factions, fighting the same team with red or green lights is just stupid

[@vfxswagg1337]

Battlefield 2025 kinda works since that's both the release date & the next modern installment after 4, which was set in 2020.

[@TheRealJupitz]

I liked that Manifest was a map that had a day env and dusk. I’d hope that they’ll add random time on maps since map gets too repetitive fast. I enjoyed dusk Manifest on breakthrough when whole hill is just covered in mist. That would also add the long waited night map

[@helcoat909]

I really hope real world biased politics will not make it into the game but I highly doubt it, If this is correct it seems Russia will not be a part of the game. I hope I'll be wrong.

[@CobraClutch34]

Theoretically, since the maps will be smaller, they will be easier to make and churn out. But practically, expecting 3 maps per season is just setting yourself up for disappointment. 4 is borderline unrealistic. I prefer quality over quantity, so I don't even think I'd want them to do that many maps per season because I don't trust they have the QA to make that many good ones.

[@user-og6ei8pr7b]

Nooooo they are doing a call of duty and turning the Russian faction into a private military faction, it’s always fun versing the Ruski team

[@MarceloSantos-hi7gn]

I still playing BF4...as it is some kind of "confort food"... if servers o BF3 still up I woul play it too.

[@TheEvil909295]

Operation Road Rage form BF2 is set in the US and A

[@smellygabacci]

Honestly the PMC thing kind if worries me. Bring in real countries again aside from just US and Russia. They should bring back the MEC!

[@moomo96]

dlcs for the multiplayer and season pass for battle royale maybe lol?

[@MaxVerclappinThemCheeks]

Love this idea

[@michaelrichardson9626]

I would like a firestorm battle Royal that was a blast just lacked the update and support really in the end. Have hope but still no pre order for me

[@hemanchannal]

I'd like to see 3 way battles.

[@MrNateFlax]

I'll be a part of any free community testing, and will probably play the free BY mode even though I hate BY before I buy it. No preorders this time.

[@mimotakito1114]

Hardline had a lot of maps in the us

[@JohnnyBravo.87]

Me neither ever like a Battle Royale. Its just not my type.

[@Wolfhound223]

FIRESTORM! we wants it.

[@dadamantium7531]

I hope they dont forget about full weapon costumizationn please mension that 🙏🏼

[@Badhero4]

Why would anyone be excited about this game? Does anyone remember BF5? and how quickly has everyone forgotten 2042!?

[@christophersebastiao7501]

If they don't add sever browser, I'm skipping this.

[@pekho8544]

BF veteran needs to interfere her about : no maps on USA soil...there was...Battlefield 2 almighty had everything...Expansion pack called Armored Fury ''The pack features the USMC defending U.S. soil from invasions from the PLA and MEC''

[@vfxswagg1337]

We need at least 2 night maps. Or imagine a map that has fog roll over.

[@Beanszo]

its like this in bf1, some maps have weather effects like fog and the tod changes a bit

[@shane1489]

Nothing will convince me to pre order this. So far it sounds like they’re paying attention to the surveys they send out and content creators. BF1 was a masterpiece and 5 got great then dumped but since BF4 I just wanted BF4 DLC with better graphics.

[@haroon4215]

@ghostgaming were u a big fan of bf1 sir?

[@camerongrieve5521]

IMO the name should just be battlefield that is it :)!

[@jodymarty3179]

Honestly I don't give a damn about the amount of guns at release, I don't care about the name, I don't even care about specialists at this point. I just want the game to work at release and work 3 years after launch. Squad system is still fucked. Black screens and not pulling party members into servers. No form of any kind of map rotation. I could go on and on. They failed in every aspect in 2042 and I hope the get their shit together.

[@DellTheVet]

I’m so excited! To hear we are getting a Battle Royale f2p at the end of the day those big content creators from warzone can come over and bring a way bigger fan base more then a lot of battlefield content creators and Battlefield will have a very large viewership it’s about numbers…

[@40xScope]

Bring back 40x scopes!

[@purplepanda8805]

I hope they don't call it Battlefield, but if they do i'll just call it Battlefield '25. Or perhaps 26?

[@TheOzoneLayerHatesMe]

Ditch any battle royal garbage and put all assets and resources into a good Battlefield with plenty of updates

[@James-hu9nz]

Only way i would call it Battlefield it would have to be bit like Destiny 2 just keep adding content over the years and become a live service with seasons and content updates etc..

[@colinwalmsley]

I loved it when u heard the enemy team speaking in their own language. Like hearing the MEC or the Chinese in bf2. Not this Russian accent shit speaking English.

[@Sloomoo]

45 Weapons are bad in my opinion. BF4 had a lot more on release...

[@SimsZan]

Imagine getting Battlefield 6 and GTA 6 around the same time

[@capolean2902]

that would be crazy ngl

[@ramsaybolton9741]

Oh yes, give them extra money for content for less content than, back in 2011 and 2013, would be only an extra 20 euros in the premium edition

[@ChristianGonzalez-sl9eo]

With all due respect Ghost, if Premium returned, you along with all those who want it back would then complain how the maps and weapons are paywalled. You would ask why the new maps are dead after 3-6 months. Well because nobody wants to pay $30-$40 for which the premium of old costed. You would also ask why you need to pay real money to get guns that do damage. And knowing EA, they would increase the price of premium since the new BF will cost $70. Sure was there more content under Premium, yes but again it was all paywalled

[@GAMEHUD1]

Calm down cat

[@stewart9540]

Never liked battle royal games, I like big maps, large player counts (classic battlefield). I really hope that the main game and FTP are worked on by separate teams. There's a lot of ongoing money from battle royal games and I think it would be detrimental to the main game in the long run if its just 1 team.

[@maxtugger1859]

Definitely not excited for it after the last crap. But a little hope that they can produce a good game.

[@DaKrawnik]

I hate the fact BF1 was as popular as it was. It was trash. So many BF KZbinrs stopped committing to BF soon after it dropped. What a complete buzz kill after dropping 2500 hours in BF3 and 4. 😢

[@lestagez]

nah 4 maps is too much per season. i’d rather quality over quantity

[@danielleonardosantos7089]

DONT PRE ORDER

[@markperez-j3d]

Dont pre order

[@vipesontv]

wishful thinking but... Linux... loved the battlefield series but i just cannot use windows anymore.

[@wraith4015]

10-10 again ghost. Think BR should be a standalone free to play outside of the main game to also give a tiny taste of the main game, nobody likes it but with in game buying... Next BF name, they need to drop the numbers and go with a second title example BATTLEFIELD "Day Break", BATTLEFIELD "Operation Zero", BATTLEFIELD "Hostile Takeover", BATTLEFIELD Freedom Fighters, BATTLEFIELD Ground Attack or "spec ops" "zero hour" or pain as we may see it to come BATTLEFIELD WW3... I mean its not too hard to replace the stupid number idea with a second title name.. I am getting sick of the numbers.

[@sonnyturner6334]

Sounds like you haven’t played 2042 lately

[@ZING-oj6zi]

HOWDY GHOST!

[@Soundmaster91]

I hope they don't pick "Battlefield" as the name, it's too final

[@shredd5705]

If they F it up it could actually be the last game... and very final

[@jedicoolgamer5517]

2042 barely had a story lol and killed off Pac for nothing! And if anything where the hell was Recker?! They could have turned the situation with Pac into a search and rescue but threw all of those opportunities away!

[@lestagez]

bf6 is fine