NEW Kia Stonic 2025 (1.2 DPI 79 hp) | POV Test Drive

[@nunzioabate5418]

Please make a pov for the 1.0 turbo mild hybrid version. It's the right engine for this car

[@LucaLivioSaglia04]

No you are wrong LONG LIVE TO THE 4 CILYNDER ENGINES

[@LucaLivioSaglia04]

Long live to 4 cilynder engines, nice car

[@cabaasomar5273]

Watching without having a car 😅

[@Mr11ESSE111]

0-100kmh in 2 weeks and max speed in 2 months

[@pawek9143]

i have driven stonic with 1.4 n/a 100 HP - it is quite slow, but with 1.2 is too slow for traffic these days.

[@sergiosilva7411]

5hp missing and with a price hike... consumers must be losing their minds if they find this reasonable! Less for more never sounds like a good deal!

[@davidbillberg2203]

Is it a diesel? Never heard of 80 hp in a Kia Stonic. I mean...why...

[@sergiosilva7411]

It used to have 84 hp, but draconian emissions laws hit this engine hard. It's even worse on the 1.0 t-gdi, it lost 20hp!!!

[@kingbreaker1972]

The citroen c3 2016-2020 had a 3 cylinder purerech 82hp non-turbo with 5speed manual But the c3 is 100kg lighter 15 cm shorter in length and 5cm in height. 1 sec faster 0-100. Max torque at 2750 rpm compared to Kia stonic 84hp at 4000rpm.

[@ssambom]

2025 i kierunkowskazy w błotnikach

[@lutsi1477]

Geez this engine must be underwhelming

[@matthias3959]

This needs a turbo engine, sorry

[@nunzioabate5418]

@matthias3959 i agree, i have the 100hp version and it's more faster than this

[@javichaguin1593]

Pues yo prefiero un atmosférico de 4 cilindros a un turbo de 3