NEW || The Aqidah Of Imam An-Nawawi & Ibn Hajar || Ustadh Abdulrahman Hassan ||

[@AMAUofficial]

00:00 Introduction 01:11 Slandering and speaking ill of the scholars 02:14 Hypocrites spoke ill about the companions 04:57 Abdullahi ibn Mubarak’s speech 05:57 Imam Ahmad said the flesh of the scholars is poisonous 09:21 Remember Ibn Asakir’s statement ! 09:49 Imam Tahawi’s speech from his aqeedah book 11:31 If a beginner student of knowledge begins with criticism when will they succeed? 13:23 Whomsoever opens their tongue on scholars their hearts will die 15:46 Ibn Hajar’s speech 17:03 His tongue blackened and fell out ! 17:57 Allah gave Imam Nawawi and Ibn Hajar acceptance 20:08 Ibn Uthaymeen’s statement 22:42 Every human makes mistakes 24:14 Removing blame from eminent scholars 24:57 Salman Al Farsi’s speech 31:40 Ibn Taymiyyah’s speech 35:08 Imam Shatibi’s speech 35:37 Are Ibn Hajar, Imam Nawawi and Bayhaqi Ash’ari? 36:06 When can you take somebody out of the Sunnah? 42:42 The people of innovation their source is not the Quran and the hadith 45:48 Foundations of the sunnah 46:30 Nine ways the Ash’ari have not complied to Quran or sunnah 59:13 Quotes by the Ash’ari on the Quran 1:03:58 Five matters in Aqeedah that are fundamental 1:10:58 Difference between an innovation and the innovator 1:14:02 Ignorance is excused 1:17:54 General quotes of the Salaf are improperly applied 1:21:11 Ibn Khuzaym’s speech 1:27:27 Conclusion

[@DanielButt]

Does ustad follow the manhaj ahlus Sunna wal jamaa ? Please I just got to know the sheikh it's important to know the aqeeda of the people of knowledge one refers to. Sorry for my ignorance

[@farasatlatif1301]

Yes definitely. He follows quran and sunnah upon understanding of salaf

[@xenomorphisisdilage472]

Wallahi, you cleared this issue completely. I have no doubt about Imam Nawawi now, Alhamdulillah.

[@peterlange2530]

Alhamdulillah

[@jebrilabdulazeez]

Al madrasatu al umariyah team are doing what no one is doing when it comes to tackling important issues that come up in our time in social media and elsewhere. Plz keep up the much needed work and may Allah bless you and protect you.

[@wayofsalafiyyah]

Excellent Explanation By Usthad Abdur Rahman Hasan. May Allah Preserve Him Ameen...!!

[@peterlange2530]

Allahuma ameen

[@DaudBurke]

امين

[@abdladigun6436]

Ustadh really doing a benefit to the Ummah.

[@MrTrueCaller619]

Unlike the barking politicians who call him a bootlicker .

[@Abdullah.996]

​@@MrTrueCaller619may Allah guide them

[@MohamedF11]

For lying

[@Smz1sh]

Ustadh abdul Rahman Hassan always clears any doubts that come Subhan’Allah! May Allah preserve him.

[@CintAAllah22]

May Allah SWT bless Ustadz for defending our imams. The biggest calamity of our time is that in the social media anyone can open a channel and represent his ideas regadless how crazy these ideas are.

[@Ibrahimy5]

So many misconceptions clarified in this video! AMAU doing amazing work.

[@studentofknowledge6431]

Alhamdulillah please keep providing clarity on this doubts and controversial issues.

[@user-rn3bb3dj4p]

In Somalia 🇸🇴 we had a devastating case in the 80s where a dozen ulema where put in front of a firing squad because they refused to allow the changing of the inheritance laws. A few years later the country plunged into civil war & chaos, the Amanah was lifted off of the country, no one could trust anyone, most ppl fled with the few clothes on their backs to far away lands subhanallah.

[@Western.war_edits]

BarakAllahu Feekum!! ☝🏼🇵🇸🤍🏳️

[@muheet602]

Ustad Abdurrahman Hassan حفظه الله is truly a gem from the gems of the scholars of our generation.

[@mariotak4632]

He is not a scholar akhi he is a Ustad. Their is a huge difference between a ‘alim (scholar) and a ustad

[@mariotak4632]

@@OfficialBruceLee How would you class him then? Teacher? Student of knowledge? He teaches the Islamic sciences which he studied to the general public in classes. So he is a ustadh in that sense.

[@affan639]

You know when you hear that intro that it’s gonna be a treasure of knowledge 🔥🫶🏼 اَللّهُمَّ بَارِكْ May Allāh preserve our Ustadh and the AMAU.

[@mahmoodahmed5470]

MaShaAllah Tabarak'Allah, what a knowledge packed lecture.

[@ehsaankhan7078]

Allah save us from this fitnah. May Allah forgive these people for the number of lies, misconceptions, misinterpretations, and exaggerations they spread about the Ashaa3irah and Maturidiyyah and the large, large group of scholars who followed in that path. The majority of the ummah and scholars.

[@oo6069]

وَإِن تُطِعْ أَكْثَرَ مَن فِى ٱلْأَرْضِ يُضِلُّوكَ عَن سَبِيلِ ٱللَّهِ ۚ إِن يَتَّبِعُونَ إِلَّا ٱلظَّنَّ وَإِنْ هُمْ إِلَّا يَخْرُصُونَ ١١٦ Majority is no proof, try Quran and Sunnah.

[@halalpolice23]

Maasha Allah Jasakalaahu Khayr sheikh

[@kab1r]

Who among the Salafiyyah would think of belittling these two giants of ilm? Hard to comprehend. May Allah guide us and guide whosoever disrespects the scholars of Islam.

[@elafzal5866]

Only misguided people slander scholars.

[@kab1r]

@@elafzal5866 we don't consider them to be Ash'aree either

[@Hamohullah4273]

​@@kab1rBut they are.

[@kab1r]

@@Hamohullah4273 how so? They only agreed with them on a couple issues but it doesn't make them ashari

[@MAbuRowais]

Actually who read the books of An-Nawawi and know the Ash’aries through their books would not doubt that he was an Ash’ary. Ibn Hajar is also considered an Ash’ary by some of the scholars. The differences in opinion came because some seekers of scholars deny them being Ash’ary based on Taqleed (my Sheikh said…). And some scholars do not actually know the Ash’aries well enough. Ash’aries are well in disguising themselves and appearing as if they would agree with the Salaf in terms of attributes. Some scholars however have distorted principles on when a person is considered among a sect. But we have to agree that the Ash’aries are innovators. So, if Nawawi turned out to be an Ash’ary, he’s an innovator. There is no exception. But if he turns out to be amongst the people of Sunna, then he’s of course not an innovator.

[@rotube739]

Jazakallahu Khayran AMAU.

[@DaudBurke]

51:46 so true. First year in azhar and the whole book they taught in Tawheed was all muntiqi qiyaas and then the ayat were brought in not as any source but rather as a cherry on their cake to show the book is Islamic… tbh the ayat were super rare and Hadith was only mentioned in the way of we reinterpret it to our own views…

[@nargissultana1949]

Alhamdulillah. I want to request AMAU for something very important. We all know that sound aqidah is the key to pure iman. There are many people among us who has no idea of even basic aqidah. They unknowingly follow the wrong ideas. All they need is a saheeh source and evidence which can teach them the right aqidah in sha Allah. I'm requesting AMAU to provide us a free course on basic aqidah which will clear our doubts in sha Allah. I hope this request will be fulfilled in sha Allah. Assalamualaikum

[@deeqamohamed2059]

Go to the playlist (madrastu al umariyya) and you Will find lesson on aqeeda with ustad explaining.

[@muhammedrefath4347]

I always read Qur'an four hours ❤❤❤❤

[@3vmr830]

ASALAM ALIKUM BROTHER ITS BETTER TO DO GOOD DEEDS IN PRIVATE BETWEEN YOU AND ALLAH BARRAK ALLAH FEEK

[@DaudBurke]

اثبتك اللهُ على طاعته

[@3vmr830]

امين يارب العالمين ولجميع المسلمين

[@kamielgerard3198]

May Allah preserve Ustadh AbdulRahan Hassan, And may we keep benefiting from him

[@falsamehabsame3268]

Honoring the truth is first and greater than honoring people

[@theboxingbiker]

Wallahi we are nearing the end of times. May Allah guide those who do tabdee' on Imam Nawawi.

[@FufuZ]

Im confused, is this for or against the video?

[@MohammedAlSharif2002]

@@FufuZfor

[@3bdo.alhashmi]

Ameen

[@BackToWorkDaily]

@@TolerantAcceptingModernCommuni please listen to the full video. Ustadh gives points from an Usual perspective and goes over the criteria before making tabbed' of someone.

[@spreaderofalhaqq]

bro forget tabdee' there are people doing takfir of him and ibn hajar just because "he is ashari"

[@Talhajawad68]

May Allah سبحانه وتعالى bless you ustadh

[@aaishahbong3824]

جزاك الله خيرا Subhana Allah I understood half of this so I am pleased you broke ir down at the end. Allahuma Baarik my brother may Allah bless you, your family, parents, children and untie you all in jannatul firdous Allahuma Ameen

[@GeneralTheDead]

JazakumuLlahu khayran for your work A brother from France

[@husseinibnomer4664]

To anybody that makes claims towards any scholar we say provide your evidence, Allah says in the Quran: "Bring your proof (of what ye state) if ye are truthful." (2:111) Ibn Abbas (RA) Narrated that the Prophet (صلى الله عليه وسلم (said: “Evidence is upon those who claim.” [Recorded in al-Sunan al-Kubra by Imam lil-Bayhaqi 10/252] Imam Ibn al-Munzir said: “Scholars had reached a consensus(Ijma) that evidence is upon those who claim ” [Kitab ul Al-Ijma by Imam Ibn al-Munzir. pg. 65] Anyone that makes a claim must back it up with evidence in the Shariah of Allah or hold themselves accountable by Allah. May Allah have mercy on the two Sheikhs and bless the Ustadh for all his good work(Allahumma Ameen).

[@MAbuRowais]

That’s true. As long as valid evidence is provided a fruitful conversation can take place.

[@maazmustafa2322]

Have only clicked on the video and the fact its 1.5 hrs long tells me this might be the most comprehensive answer we've heard on the topic. May Allah bless all those who put so much effort & time into these videos

[@mohamedhafizbah3672]

جزاكم الله خير الجزاء وحفظكم الله وعاكم شيخنا الفاضل.

[@WayOfThePious]

Very important subject. 2 of the greatest scholars upon the right manhaj need to be protected from those who say they were upon the wrong manhaj. Jazakallah hu khairan Ustadh Abdul Rahman. And the team.

[@jslj5774]

I don't think u know aqeedah or ''manhaj'' if u believe they were on the way of the salaf and the right path in aqadi matters. Ibn Baaz has a whole paper where he corrects Ibn Hajars aqeedah.

[@WayOfThePious]

He made mistakes, and so did many others (Rahimaumullah). Doesn't mean we take them out of the manhaj of the Salaf (Rahimaumullah). Jazak Allah khairan.

[@jslj5774]

@@WayOfThePious okay bro just tells me your answer is based on feelings and not knowledge. Wa iyyak

[@WayOfThePious]

Hmm. If you read their work, Akhi, they use the Qur'an, sunnah, and saying of the salaf. They have mistakes on a few aqeeqah related issues. The ulama have spoken well of them and overlooked their mistakes (due to the amazing work they did for the ummah). And Allah knows best.

[@jslj5774]

@@WayOfThePious Bro once again your answer isn't built on knowledge or any manhaj. Doing ''amazing work'' for the ummah has no bearing, asharis as a whole have done amazing work in majority of fields in islam. '' they use the Qur'an, sunnah, and saying of the salaf'' to general, what does it even mean? In fiqh, Aqeedah, shurooh ahadeeth, tafseer? ''The ulama have spoken well of them and overlooked their mistakes'', who from the salaf preceded them in doing this? Overlooking and praising people who distort aqeedah? Infact Imam Ahmed and the salaf called people innovators for thing much much much much less than this. Bro u keep saying ''mistakes'' when it's a systematic and fundemental problem that made them do these ''mistakes''. Was Ar Razi just ''mistaken''? Whats the governing principle here? Ustad abbdurrahman dosen't give anything either.

[@DaudBurke]

Wow that lamp is crazy!

[@Muwahid999]

He could've used green screen🤔

[@qm6595]

May Allah's mercy be upon An Nawawi and Ibn Hajar, and may Allah reward ARH and Shaykh Hussaini for defending the honour of those two great scholars, Muhammad ibn Shamsuddeen's stance with regards to Nawawi, Ibn Hajar and AH, has done damage to the Muslims

[@InaAbdurRazzaq]

BarakAllahu feekum

[@deeqamohamed2059]

May ALLAH GIVE YOU AND THE TEAM A GOOD ENDING

[@user_bilalh]

ما شاء صاحب علم وحفظ لكن لا يعرف الكثير من الناس حقيقة الشيخ عبد الرحمن بن حسن

[@ryadhk.5286]

Allahouma barek alayka Sheikh May Allah reward you and grant you Al Firdaws al a'laa, ameen

[@Kakeshii]

Spoiling us alot ya shaykh❤❤

[@govindabahadur7278]

Jazakallahu Khayran.

[@ahnaf_akif_mbbs_bd_ksa]

1:30 warning against slandering , specially scholars of Sunnah 17:00 addressing the core issue 22:00 humans are not free from mistakes and shortcomings 25:00 two extreme pole regarding evaluation of a person 35:00 discussion focused on foundation of Sunnah 50:00 Argumentative approach to Aqeedah rather than the Revelation and narrations is rejected ! 1:00:00 discussion on fundamental and subsidiary issues 1:07:00 conditions for labeling someone as innovator 1:16:00 difference between general and specific rulling 1:20:00 issue of Imām Ibn khuzaima 1:26:00 ibn taymiyyah's research and conclusion

[@ahnaf_akif_mbbs_bd_ksa]

kzbin.info/aero/PL_lKQa7W5K-xl8DpXwIfKktYzYn5Wvr5j this playlist also address the issue very academically and concisely . May Allah Accept it for those Mu'min who are seeking the Haqq for the sake of Allah

[@yaahaams9071]

ustad caalimkasta oo kutub leh aqoonta ka qaado waxa ku anfacaya bes caqiddada salafkana ilasho 💯

[@atemaaddy9636]

May allah preserve you ameen

[@millatiibrahim2416]

JazaakAllah khayr ustaadh, Please forgive me for ever calling you murji'a although the issue of legislation is still something I'm learning, I spoke too hastily on you and you yourself have now taught me some principles on takfeer, tabdee, tafsiq from Salaf , I hope you'll forgive me for that JazaakAllah khayr

[@gabreial881]

Jazakumu allahu kheyraa for the effort to clear the misconceptions on social media

[@uas4613]

Amazing❗️❗️❗️

[@seamus4055]

Ustadh, we need many more videos from scholars on this. There are some people like Mohammed Shamsuddin who have built 100,000s of followers off this. If this is not addressed now, it will not end well

[@nahianjalal]

1:21:10 wallahi, never knew of this. May Allah preserve Ustadh Abdulrahman Hassan and bless amau team.

[@techutopiareviews]

Nice series.

[@Majed2000AFR]

Hi brother I remember you making those videos about dolphin emulation and watching these as a younger kid and it's really nice seeing you here جزاك الله خيرا

[@gilbertomoreaux1917]

Mashallah what a beautiful explanation!!allah mubarick!!

[@DAWAHTIME1]

The topic of the Title starts at 35mins

[@StudentOfKnowldge]

Too beneficial.

[@DaudBurke]

بارَكَ اللهُ فِيك وجزاك خيرا والله قد اغضبني المتعالم محمد شمس الدين في وقعته فيهما ثم بعد المناظرة رايت من يريد ان يتكلم فيهما والله مستعان فليتقوا الله. كما رواه في الاربعين قال الله من عادى لي وليا فقد آذنته بالحرب

[@alhomsiyyah]

محمد بن شمس الدين أم من؟

[@DaudBurke]

@@alhomsiyyah نعم هو

[@muhammedrefath4347]

Nice class usthad ❤❤❤

[@Western.war_edits]

This was amazing👍🏼👍🏼

[@amnaoverhere]

جزاك الله خيرا

[@bmedic7162]

I've been needing this video for a long time and it's great but a lot of it doesn't make sense to me because of the abundance of arabic used without interpretation, e.g minute 54:00 and 55:00

[@SoYouSow.SoYouReap]

Agreed. In part of 'quotes by the Ashari on the Quran ', I still have no idea what the quote is.

[@TheBurnttea]

Shaikh falah ismaeel dealt with this issue years ago in a brief and beautiful manner. In less than 15 minutes he destroyed the claim that Imam nawawi was an ashari.

[@elafzal5866]

Why is it that some people are convinced and claim he was an Ashari? They also give their evidence for it, statements and believes of the Imam. I am just asking, I am not informed on this issue.

[@jslj5774]

With all due respect to the sheikh and Ustadh Abdurrahman both are wrong. Imam An Nawawi 100% agreed with the asharis in usool ad deen, his taweelat comes from believeing those usool, they aren't random taweelat and mistakes.

[@Jdjfjcueje]

I just went and watched the clip you are refering to and it is genuinely one the worst videos on the topic (may Allah have mercy and forgive the shaykh). Firstly, all 3 of his principles to decide whether or not a scholar is an Ashari are inaccurate. 1. "Asharis put complete precedence of the Aql above the Naql" This is factually false, in one famous mas'alah (التحسين و التقبيح) the Ashari position is that actions can only be judged to be good or evil based on the Naql and NOT the Aql, while Ahl al Sunnah believe that some actions can be jugde as good or evil based on Aql alone. 2. "Asharis divide the nusus into mutawatir and ahad, and they only accept mutawatir in Aqida". Firstly, All Usuli scholars divide the nusus into Qati' and Dhani, and there are group of Ashari scholars that accept Ahad reports in aqaid if they deem there to be qarai'n that indicate its certainty. 3. "Ashari's will do Ta'weel of the nusus until they conform to the Aql" Again, factually incorrect, a well known stance within the Ashari school is Tafweed, which was even adopted by the likes of Al-Juwayni, who nobody disagrees is an Ashari. And his final point that neither Al-Nawawi or Ibn Hajr fell into any of these 3, honestly shows that he either read their books but is being dishonest, or did not read them at all.

[@jslj5774]

@@Jdjfjcueje Good post bro, but I would like to add that Asharis like u said take both taweeel and tafweed approach but some of their major scholars acutally criticted each of the others position severly. One side saying taweel is guessing and the other saying tafweed is nonsense and ascribing deficinecy to the wahyi. Also the ''taqdeem aql alaa naql'' is true but not in the simplistic way they described it in the mentioned videos. ''taqdeem aql alaa naql'' is holding on views concering substance theory (hawadith, ajsaam, a3raadh) and holding them to be absolutley true and the filtering the nusoos thereby, what I know Imam An Nawawi believed in substance theory. That's the reason for all his taweelat in sifaat. Sh Falah and Ustaadh Abdurrahman denying this is unfortunate. Unfourtnatley Salafiyoon are inconsistent in this and will label certain asharis innovators and spare others even tho they share usool and come to the same furoo3 conclusions based on that. What im wondering is, are they willing to say Bishr al marisi fell into mistakes and he is still from ahlu sunnah? Or Zamakhshari, Baqillani, ar Razi? Or has this become a game of they wrote some nice books and the ummah liked them? The funny thing is those who made An Nawawi and Ibn hajr famous were Asharis and Maturidis, if ahlu sunnah would have been majority after 500 hijri I wouldn't think a single mutakalim would have any fame!

[@elafzal5866]

​@@JdjfjcuejeAre you Ashari if i may ask?

[@Asdpdkl]

جزاكم الله خيرا و بارك الله فيكم

[@onlyhuman12321]

Everyday their is somthing new

[@ranas2484]

نتبع الحق القراءن وهدي الرسول والصحابة رضوان الله عليهم غيرهم ياخذ ويرد عليهم ليسو بمعصومين

[@Mohammad.A96]

Jazakallah khairan

[@MuslimReverthelp]

Assalam aleikum, mashallah

[@eze1373]

Too many people on social media platforms talking nonsense and speaking without knowldge. Everyone seems to think they can have an opinion on great scholars, probably never read a single book cover to cover yet these greats authored volumes and volumes of works…. Yet people come along and causally dismiss great ulama with a single comment on a social media feed. Jaahil. Ignorant. Disrespectful.

[@AbdulRahman.Ibn.Ali.As.Somali]

Would you consider Abdirahman Hassan one of those people?

[@ahnaf_akif_mbbs_bd_ksa]

MashaAllah alhamdulliah Barakallah very precise , academic and beneficial . even layman like me , can be enlightened with such eye opening discussion which eradicates every confusion and doubts surrounding us . May Allah accept ustadh Abdulrahman Hassan for this comprehensive discussion . and also reward those great imams have been mentioned here and let us benefit from there tremendous works left for us . AMEEN

[@ibrahim_906]

32:00 1:03:57 1:22:30

[@colombusfranklin1283]

It really must be the end times if ppl have questions about Imam Nawawi and Ibn Hajar... this is how far the fitna of those Wahhabiyya went. This happens if you allow deviants in your house for too long

[@bluerox8812]

Talking about "Wahabiyyah" on a "Wahabiyyah" channel lol

[@yacinezidani8610]

@@bluerox8812 and the wahabi are hanbalis and also talk and respect ibn hajar and nawawi , they knew only wahabiyyah and they dont search that the wahabiyyah are against this fitna against scholars

[@abdulkareemhendricks9076]

Assalamu alaykum warahmatullaahi. Shaykh must give a lecture on life of imaam abul hasan al asharee. And explain life and his creed and what he did on

[@ahnaf_akif_mbbs_bd_ksa]

I would also like to request AMAU to held such academic discussion regarding ibn taymiyyah and later on, the najdee dawah May Allah also reward those imams

[@DiallingIn]

MashaAllah Ustadh, for an English lecture which I understood less than half as you don’t translate majority of the Arabic quotes. Just some positive feedback iA

[@Akhi0701]

Why cant we apply these principles to scholars other than ibn Hajar and Nawawi then? Like Ashari scholars of today?

[@AbuMaryam_AbuFirdaus]

Because they have not the usul of Ahlussunnah ! From the Asl they are Ahlul Bidah.

[@ProudSunniMuslim]

Because they are actual ash’aris who adhere to the Usul of the ashaa’irah

[@Adam10412]

​​​​@@lumiam6982 To some extent, it's true that the majority of the 'ulamma were Asharīs but the earliest creed was also the Atharī/Hanbalite creed because objectively there's no one amongst the salaf who did ta'weel, some of the Ashai'rah did argue that the salaf did tafwīd but we have statements from imam Malik for example proving otherwise: Abdullah ibn Nafi’ reported: Imam Malik, may Allah have mercy on him, was asked about the saying of Allah Almighty, “The Most Merciful rose above the Throne,” (20:5). The man said, “How is His rising?” Malik said, “The rising is acknowledged, its modality is unknown, and asking about it is an innovation. I see you are a man who intended evil with this question.” Source: al-Istidhkār 2/529 عَنْ عَبْدِ اللَّهِ بْنِ نَافِعٍ قَالَ سُئِلَ مَالِكٌ رحمه الله عَنْ قَوْلِ اللَّهِ عَزَّ وَجَلَّ الرَّحْمَنُ عَلَى الْعَرْشِ اسْتَوَى قَالَ كَيْفَ اسْتَوَى فَقَالَ اسْتِوَاؤُهُ مَعْلُومٌ وَكَيْفِيَّتُهُ مَجْهُولَةٌ وَسُؤَالُكُ عَنْ هَذَا بِدْعَةٌ وَأَرَاكَ رَجُلَ سُوءٍ Imam Malik clearly states that what's unknown is the kayfiyyah not the ma'ana. It's impossible to deny that one of the main reasons why Najdi dawah was spread was because of political influence but it's also impossible to deny that one of the main reasons why asharīsm was spread from was because of Nizam al Mulk who was truthfully a political genius

[@ProudSunniMuslim]

@@lumiam6982 ah yes the same ibn Abi Zayd al Qayrawaani who your own scholars denounced and accused him of holding Allah to be in a direction

[@ProudSunniMuslim]

@@lumiam6982 you’re an absolute liar who knows nothing about the Hanaabilah. It’s no wonder that your own scholars accuse all of Imam Ahmad’s students, including his son as being Mujassimah. This is literally what your mutakallim Anas al Sharfawi said. Imam al Marrudhi was one of those who believed The Prophet(as) will sit with Allah on his throne, which is Kufr according to your jahmi standards. Harb al Kirmani even affirmed harakah for Allah, also Kufr by your jahmi standards. And al Khallal has a whole work on proving that the Prophet(as) will sit with Allah on his throne. You have no understanding of what you’re even quoting.

[@ozone2126]

😊

[@AbuAbdillahi1]

May Allah reward you Sheikh. Perhaps it would have been good or from comprehensiveness that you would have clarified which Mistakes they have done in Aqeedah. I mean which Sifaat they did Ta'weel in and how, so as to stay far from these aspects of their Aqeedah. احسن اللّه اليكم

[@S-P-1-h1r]

Where do Ashaairah get their beliefs from before they look for any evidence? If they are making up the beliefs, without evidence and if they dismiss nusoos does that take them out the fold of Islam? Just a brother trying to learn. Not doing takfeer on anyone as i have no knowledge to do so.

[@mohammedhaider7653]

This means all the main books of usool (Al ghazali, Razi, Aamidi, Jassas, Saraksi etc) were written by scholors who don't believe the Qur'an and Sunnah are sources of law. 😮 this is amazing. The key usoolis don't believe Qur'an and Sunnah are sources of law. 😅

[@al-aleem]

Is there a full video of "intro"????

[@skoofisf]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/mKC8o5pthttkj6csi=e0JoOyI4qBSfxCz2

[@zahier2004]

السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته أخي Search: the recitation of Laamiyah attributed to Ibn Taymiyyah

[@al-aleem]

@@zahier2004 شکرن

[@al-aleem]

@@zahier2004 وعلیکم السلام

[@zahier2004]

@@al-aleem و اياكم

[@Ibn267]

30:00

[@saianbhahdi5570]

Please next time translate the Arabic to English when quoting because some ppl don't understand Arabic and are completely lost . Jazakallah khayr.

[@MAbuRowais]

6:04 The statement „The flesh of the scholars are poisoned…“ is coming from Ibn Asaker who was Ash’ary by the way. I am speaking only about the mentioned part of the statement. You said that Imam Ahmed said this according to the source you named. I have no access to this source in order to check wether there’s is a chain of narration or not. But the source you mentioned is definitely not primary source. The issue I see here as well is that according to my knowledge of Imam Ahmed is that he had a particular way to express himself and he was cautious and accurate in wording. The statement does not fit his way of expressing himself. Update: I got the book. The quote from Imam Ahmed is mentioned without a chain of narration. This means attributing this quote to Ahmed relying on this source is scientifically incorrect to say the least. And I am saying this since Imam Ahmed is truly an Imam and Ibn Asaker who has been quoted alongside him was an Ash’ary. 21:42 By the way if you want to defend An-Nawawi you inevitably have to proof that he didn’t engage in innovations of disbelief. Because innovations of disbelief are not merely mistakes, they can wipe out the whole effort he spent on studying and teaching. Defending him with emotionally charged arguments is a bad strategy and is known to be a fallacy.

[@Ibn267]

11:30

[@reigekisimosi]

Assalamu'alaikum.

[@realitycheck816]

Does anyone know the nasheed at the start

[@isam789]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/mKC8o5pthttkj6csi=yZNqqQRFGkLm8MSN

[@garyboston4837]

When someone shared the link with me for this, my initial comment was, "I expect this will be a decisive exposition of the position of illiterate Salafis." Sure enough, ARH does not disappoint. Someone just informed me (and I checked the video myself... see 48:30) that he says the latter Ash'aris of accepting mutawatir hadiths are qat'i but "only zanni" in dalalah. He seems to think that this is some sort of big gotcha. Now, as you will all be aware, the Qur'an is mutawatir, but that does not prevent many of its verses being zanni in dalalah. A single verse can even carry many meanings, some of which are zanni and some of which are qat'i. You only have to look to any medium to large tafsir written through the ages to find abundant examples of this. Indeed, the Qur'an itself tells us that it contains verses that are decisive and clear (muhkam) and verses that are ambiguous (mutashabih). The ambiguous verses can be misinterpreted, particularly when does not understand them in light of the muhkam verses. To be clear, most Salafis do not reach anywhere near this sort of jahl murakkab. In that respect, ARH is quite special. Copy and pasted.

[@ggghgf885]

You literally made 0 point you just strawmaned what he said bad try

[@husainpatel7683]

​@@ggghgf885 Go and find a statement from the asha'irah that says that the Mutawatir Ahadeeth are ظني الدلالة You won't be able to because it makes no sense to say that.

[@zahirsookoor2673]

Tell the people the truth...that your Shiekh Nasirudeen Al baani affirmed and mentioned that Imam Nawawi is Ashari.

[@najeebjohnson7747]

This guy is so dishonest , not all ashari are the same

[@MuslimVoyager]

37:36 Listen to this part… InshaAllah you will benefit and It will clear respond to your question/comment as well InshaAllah…

[@DAWAHTIME1]

Time stamps would be helpful

[@jeremyh9213]

Just started listening to the talk...will finish it in sha Allah, but I was curious, does not criticizing the scholars extend to scholars of other movements like deobandis, for example? Maybe the sheikh already covered this, but I thought I'd ask in case I forget.

[@merexchannel4365]

1:22:04 I didn't understand this anyone explain?

[@jonielegant7558]

If the clear his mis guided so what we will do ?

[@Ibn267]

13:00

[@axlamwaheed3008]

Innovator

[@ibrahim_906]

32:30

[@nabilIbnMimounHadouchi]

Does this also apply on a local imam of a masjid, who is a full fledged Ashari’. And who belittles the brothers and scholars who are upon the Manhaj Salafiyyah. And that for example a salafi brother (who has not memorized the Quran yet). Warns about that Ashari’ imam (of a masjid). By saying that he has a wrong Aqeedah regarding Eman, and the attributes of Allah. But not going over board. And doing justice by also saying: “that the local imam has a Corrupt Aqeedah, eventhough he has knowledge about the Arabic language, Tajweed, Fiqh, Hadith and Tafsier”. But that it is better to leave of taking from him since he also gives lectures and classes based on the books of Al Ghazali, and Ramadan Al Bouti.

[@fsl72]

Hoped to benefit from this, but can’t. Most of the important content is in Arabic and never translated to English. The Ustaad goes like “Fakhr ad Din ar Razi said…” and then a few minutes of arabic, and no translation. Yes, I should learn arabic, I’m trying. But what’s the point of making a video in English if you’re not going to translate the Arabic? I don’t even understand so much of this.

[@lazgheen]

السلام عليكم يا شيخ. فهمت من كلامكم انكم تقولون بأن الموتى في قبورهم يسمعون. فهل أنا اسأت الفهم؟ هذا اولا. اما ثانيا فليتك القيت هذه المحاضرة باللغتين العربية والانجليزية بشكل منفصل. بارك الله فيكم وسدد خطاكم لما يحبه ويرضاه.

[@ibnmasood]

Can you specifally address the issues without appealing to authority bias. What about imam As-suyútī and his books

[@aaheemas]

Around 1:14:00, is it okay to use an example of kufr (saying that the Qur'an is created) in proving that the point for tabdee'? Surely pronouncing takfeer on a muslim has more stringent conditions than pronouning tabdee'?

[@justabrother356]

50:45 you mean put the aql before the naql right?

[@mahmudmarsudi4430]

Ash'ari is Ahlu al Sunnah

[@GharibBFulan]

Some of the quotes of these ashari scholars are too much.

[@Mahad921]

Akhi, you gave some quotes from Imam Ahmed where he gave excuses for people so why don't you do that for the ashacira and not just used ibnu taymiyah in his hash statements. Ignorance is an excuse you said so be fair

[@shokzz1532]

Imam Ahmed was more harsh than most of us are today

[@QananiisaaIdris]

@@shokzz1532I don’t believe so. Imam Ahmad said “اخراج الشخص من السنة شديد" which means “Taking a person out of the Sunnah is severe”. So it’s a one to one analysis, an individual analysis.

[@pearlsofadaab]

I challenge ANYONE to find me a statement from Imam Nawawi stating he was an Ashari. The same goes for Ibn Hajar. One of the fundamental beliefs of the Ashaa'irah is that to affirm the Qur'an and the Sunnah at it's apparent is KUFR. Imam Nawawi has the best explanation of Sahih Muslim, Ibn Hajar has the best explanation of Sahih Bukhari. Nawawi has written numerous book's in Hadith like Riyaad As Saliheen and 40 Hadith. Rather, Ibn Hajar stated that when Fakhr al-Dīn al-Rāzī died, he repented and came back to Ahlus Sunnah... What did Ibn Hajr state about this event? That Fakhr al-Dīn al-Rāzī died a death in which his aqeedah was perfected. Thus from this, you'd understand that Ibn Hajar himself understood that the Ashaa'irah and their aqeedah was baatil. To simplify matters, if I am a Maaliki, and I agree with an issue with the Shaafi'iyah, does that mean I am now a Shaafi? No I simply agree with them on THAT issue. That's the same for these 2 GREAT imams who fell into some mistakes regarding the Attributes of Allah. Rather, go look at their works, they affirm names and attributes of Allah that the Ashaa'irah don't!

[@pearlsofadaab]

​@@datasets2046بارك الله فيكم، look in the books of history, his speech regarding Fakhr al-Dīn al-Rāzī is well known and easily found. Additionally, his affirmation of some of the attributes of Allah which aren't in line with the Ashari's 7 is another evidence to show he never fell into their aqeedah. As the poet says: حي عليم قدير و الكلام له إرادة و كذلك السمع و البصر

[@mshafi4180]

Didn't the Ashaa'irah fall into mistakes also then? Can't we overlook their mistakes like we do for an-Nawawi and ibn Hajar

[@ابوآسيةالسويسري]

Did you not listen or you just didnt understand this video?

[@pearlsofadaab]

@@mshafi4180 the ashaa'irah have built a while madhaab which have usuul that fundamentally opposes ahlus sunnah in multiple issues, unlike the likes of these 2 great imams

[@ProudSunniMuslim]

@@mshafi4180you would’ve have asked such a question if you watched the video

[@jaouadjaouad5990]

Both imam Nawawi and Ibn Hajar, have the same creed as the asha'ira regarding the Sifaat of Allah. So, nice story but they have the same aqida as the asha'ira, so you wahhabis are not on the aqida of ahlu sunna. Nice try