Deng policy works during his time when US and global environment was conducive to China growth but no more when CN has reach a certain development stage where the west starts to feels the threat and try to checkmate CN growth… Thus Xi policy suit his time and global political. environment.
@thisiskevin10006 ай бұрын
Against the backdrop of the Cold War with the former Soviet Union. But it should be credited as well with the rest of the Eastern bloc and a few friendly Western nations like Switzerland, France, Finland, Sweden, Denmark and Norway for laying the foundation of Chinese industrialization in the 50s and 60s
@Aramsa-Khan5 ай бұрын
Professor Ang's narrative on President Xi is not quote accurate.
@momo_san19806 ай бұрын
I've been in China for 18 years. I must say that the air quality, water cleanliness at the river near by my home, public safety, and public good have all been greatly improved. There used be polluted days covered with smog, the river stank, parents afraid of kidnappers, etc... It takes a strong leader to clean these things up.
@jaytso18836 ай бұрын
Sadly, "strong leadership" is used deliberately by the West to demonise as "autocratic", "oppression" etc ......
@minosknossos6 ай бұрын
In big cities, yes.
@ArchsStanton5 ай бұрын
@@minosknossos : *GO lookup "katherine's journey to the east"..........*
@horridohobbies6 ай бұрын
China is democratic but not in the Western liberal fashion. Why should democracy only be defined in terms of multiple political parties vying for power at the ballot box? China's democracy is consultative in nature rather than switching out political parties that fail to perform. The government solicits feedback and input from the people. China's democracy is meritocratic rather than based on popularity contests known as elections. These popularity contests rarely produce good leaders. China's democracy has proven to be very effective and well-supported. According to *Latana's Democracy Perception Index 2024,* 79% of Chinese regard their country as democratic while only 57% of Americans and 55% of British do. According to the *Edelman Trust Barometer 2024,* 85% of Chinese trust their government while only 40% of Americans and 30% of British do. According to the *Open Society Barometer 2023,* 76% of Chinese trust their politicians while only 29% of Americans and 20% of British do. According to *a study from Harvard Kennedy School in 2020,* 95.5% of Chinese are satisfied with their government. We cannot call China's government "autocratic." This is manifestly incorrect.
@rtan10956 ай бұрын
A point if endorsement - the coming US president election (if Trump is nominated by Republican) is between an aged President who hardly can walk and another convicted felon candidate is this the best US liberal model Can produced???
@horridohobbies6 ай бұрын
@@rtan1095 It's astonishing to me that the most powerful country in the world is led by either a dementia-ridden flesh puppet or a narcissistic, bombastic clown. US democracy is a farce.
@lipsach6 ай бұрын
This.
@dreamadventure82206 ай бұрын
Lol 😂😂😂
@horridohobbies6 ай бұрын
@@dreamadventure8220 Of course, you can't refute anything in my comment. 🤣
@jaytso18836 ай бұрын
It's not Autocracy vs Democracy, but rather Meritocracy vs Plutocracy
@kenzyisaac19136 ай бұрын
nice insight
@horridohobbies6 ай бұрын
All political systems evolve. The US political system evolved. China's political system evolved. Today, China's model of governance is much improved. Thanks to China's capable and intelligent leadership (based on meritocracy rather than popularity contests), China's spectacular growth was based on decades of good policies executed with great efficiency without hindrance. The Western model of governance has resulted in economic and political turmoil which we've all witnessed these past several decades. Ergo, China's model of governance is superior to the West's.
@carrier_pigeon2146 ай бұрын
I'm hardly anything even remotely close to a China expert but it does seem that your argument over the course of this video series is aimed at discrediting Xi. I'm not saying that's wrong (because honestly, I'm not educated enough on the topic to know) but it does stand out to me.
@robertseaborne57583 ай бұрын
The original intention of economic thinking was about the wellbeing of the people , nowadays (especially within Liberal democracies) it is more about the well being of corporations. At least socialism with Chinese characteristics is retaining some of the original intention of economics.
@parhhesia6 ай бұрын
Fair analysis, but it doesn’t incorporate the changing geopolitical context from Deng to Xi. Western leaders liked Deng; on the cusp of Xi's ascension, China had grown so much that the USA decided to contain it (ie, the 'pivot to Asia'). It follows that a more defensive, unified Chinese political leadership was necessary to meet this threat. No matter how China is governed, the USA will be hostile unless it has a puppet in charge.
@sinsinchandra35756 ай бұрын
You need political stability at top level and social cohesiveness at the other end for a big country and large population like China. Without the above 2, they won't success in revitalising the country and they know it very well. Authoritarian or capitalism are not that relevant. To paint them with authoritarian or capitalism or which one is better is just missing the point or even misleading.
@ozychk216 ай бұрын
Thanks for putting these excellent videos online 🙏🏽
@cslim92316 ай бұрын
thank you Professor ANg and iNet for the insightful presentation which provides a provocative view on the subject matter.
@jeanpaul2628Ай бұрын
This is a masterclass
@waywalker1706 ай бұрын
I wonder what you're omitting Doctor Ang
@ale.channel3 ай бұрын
Democracy does not make a country advanced, instead it causes division, because each group has different goals. We can see our country, Indonesia. The capitalist country helped Soeharto become president. Establishing power for 30 years. For 30 years our country achieved good economic growth, although it was not evenly distributed. After 30 years, according to their policy, we had to become a democracy through the 2002 law. But after almost 25 years there were no clear results.
@1991laconich6 ай бұрын
Francis Fukujama quoted in a vieo produced by INET? Odd
@skkhoo625 ай бұрын
Ok, episode 1, I finished watching because I wanted to learn about this aunty but I can just barely finish watching episode 2. I don't think I'll be watching further episodes.
@GlobeHackers6 ай бұрын
Excellent lecture; it's informative and easy to comprehend. I don't think many people in the world wrestle with the definition of democracy. If we think democracy is voting, we have abdicated our responsibility as citizens. Leaders must be responsible for the significant investment made in affecting the narrative.
@Aramsa-Khan5 ай бұрын
China is facing the US aggressive move. China must remain strong
@pranavmanie14796 ай бұрын
Ang is always excellent. I don't agree completely with her on China's democratic characteristics under Deng, but this is great myth breaking. I have a feeling China will also likely lead the solar industrial revolution - which we desperately need to combat climate change.
@ryanmckenna20475 ай бұрын
Deng seems quite democratic
@simplycf30105 ай бұрын
You people are just unwilling to admit that so called authoritarianism is not as bad as you believe. Like seriously, the most prosperous civilizations in ancient times were all authoritarian. Even if the times are different why do you think humanity should completely dismiss this model?
@sidharthar5676 ай бұрын
Waiting 🔥
@leoxing76976 ай бұрын
Common sense and culture is more important than any amount of democracy.
@anti-genocide6 ай бұрын
The soviet union wasn't a dictatorship as you can easily figure it out from the word "union" . it's a popular democracy or an illiberal popular democracy !
@roc78805 ай бұрын
in this case Nazi Germany was a socialist country because it had the name in the title.
@anti-genocide5 ай бұрын
@@roc7880 It's not about the title . they were basically republics under the soviet union just like the states in the US . A popular democracy always require a one party and one ideology that dominates the state and it's much progressive than a representative democracy , I think American political culture is so poor in that regard
@peaceleader73156 ай бұрын
Our socialism_communism dream is and will be dominant.. hmmmm vanguard nations ... Cuba 🇨🇺 China 🇨🇳 Vietnam 🇻🇳 Russia 🇷🇺 south Africa 🇿🇦 and Argentina 🇦🇷 will uphold our principal no what ever the storm...hmmmm.
@ablefamilee65385 ай бұрын
🙏🏼👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼🙏🏼
@gilberttello086 ай бұрын
👍👍
@tonysia64746 ай бұрын
❤❤❤👍👍👍
@emiliobertrandbungegonzale99616 ай бұрын
neoliberal worldview
@dmoneytron6 ай бұрын
This is “sophisticated” as neoliberal analysis goes.
@SillyLittleAshTree6 ай бұрын
Perhaps each leader has embodied a sort of Chinese Zeitgeist, according to the needs at the time.
@arthurhwang1176 ай бұрын
Her bias is becoming more and mire evident.
@dbmorganizing5 ай бұрын
Sincerely quoting Fukuyama who has been wrong about every prediction shows the level of propaganda this series will be
@tonytan65476 ай бұрын
The speaker has a subtle western slant
@SillyLittleAshTree6 ай бұрын
This far, I've found the slant acceptable enough to have shared the videos. I've been sure to footnote them, though.
@stepmaster99886 ай бұрын
Subtle how 😅
@bdmajuqwana4050Ай бұрын
She's dancing to a familiar tune
@oxvendivil4426 ай бұрын
Mao was not perfect, Deng was not perfect, Xi was not perfect but I'm pretty sure future generations will hold Deng dearly and never forget him, he will be remembered alright! for Xi? I'm not so sure, he had a lot of promise but he squandered it! he should have respected the term limits but he didn't, he got too full of himself, he probably has a Messiah complex?!
@srikumarmondal32946 ай бұрын
If free market is "democracy" then how come communism is "dictatorship"?