Newton vs. Leibniz: on Time and Space - Philosophy's Greatest Stories (Episode 4)

[@杨赞羽]

Thanks!

[@yamlau-gx7nx]

Really appreciate your presentation. It really helps for a better understanding on monads in relation to the space/time registers.

[@samuelreolfi6639]

🎉

[@miguelnapoli3846]

I really appreciated your presentation. Thank you very much.

[@franciscolandazabal4070]

Great effort to explain such a complex subject. Congrats!.

[@timshel1499]

Amazing elucidation.

[@RP-mm9ie]

Thanks 😊

[@jimmyfaulkner1855]

Are there any good arguments against absolute space and time?

[@bryan3dguitar]

How about relativity? Ever heard of it?

[@markwrede8878]

Multiplication, in the repetition of which all meaning resides, converts the infinite number line into an unending, but finite population. Our numbers may be scaled, but the real world can be inferred only within our numerical assignments. The bundling of multiplication and addition under arithmetic creates inconsistency in that the "plus one" of addition is not defined, whereas multiplication is defined only for identical elements.

[@brettb9194]

Also bringing Leibnitz with him might have aggravated the hot swap between the German aristocracy and the British - let's keep the heavy German accents to a minimum, shall we? 🤔

[@RuthvenMurgatroyd]

Don't think it's completely accurate to say that Leibnitz was "ostracized by the scientific community". Certainly in British mathematics but on the continent, in Germany or France? No, I don't think that is right. For one, Bernoulli kept a close relationship with him.