Next Generation VTOL Helicopter Are Coming

Next Generation VTOL Helicopter Are Coming /
Drone, fighter jet, and helicopter, all in one - this is the future of American VTOL helicopters. At a time when world powers must be even more powerful, no military asset can afford to not be useful in virtually every mission. As a result, traditional helicopters must now make way for a more advanced type of aircraft known as Tiltrotors. They fly faster, farther, and most importantly, they have better VTOL agility. To understand the importance of VTOL in tiltrotors, it is important to know how it works.

[@BHARGAV_GAJJAR]

Clicked for avatar helicopter thumb nail where is it ?

[@corwinzelazney5312]

Nowhere. More bullshit deceptive thumbnails.

[@GabrielDunacea3089]

In the year 2100 probably 😂

[@madilson5619]

Clickbait

[@chrissmith7669]

A big tilting ducting fan with no wing would be a bad idea. No way to glide or autorotate in such a configuration. You’d need a big parachute if the engine fails.

[@RichardRobertson]

VTOL Helicopters, goodness me! What will they think of next?

[@TheSuperGamerZombie]

Makes no sense this title.

[@RichardRobertson]

@@TheSuperGamerZombie Next, they'll be introducing flying airplanes!

[@lill4nd090]

Literally the only man who said anything about "VTOL" helicopters 😭 like damn helicooter is a VTOL from the ground up, this signature is used for planes that can do Vertical Tak-off Or Landing not fucking helicopters 💀

[@Rotorhead1651]

😂😝😄😅😜😁🤣👍😉

[@bongnan8827]

❤My love

[@sterlingbaade2024]

I thought all helicopters were VTOL? Wouldn't calling something a VTOL Helicopter be like calling a Glock a Firearm Glock?

[@MrZpeppers]

The video isn’t very good at explaining it. In short ones got wings, one doesn’t.

[@mrgonzale0978]

I remember a few animated shows and anime movies with some cool Vtol helis. now its the time to built them. mostly like the avatar movie ones and the the animated series gargoyles.

[@user-pq4by2rq9y]

Fun fact: both valor and raider should be capable of short take off and landing. That's useful because you can use lift to reduce load on the engines during these procedures if a runway is available.

[@minecraftblockychris8708]

but look at the crash stats lmao

[@n3v3rforgott3n9]

@@minecraftblockychris8708 ... yes look at them and you would find out that the Osprey is one of the safest aircraft the Navy flies. You are a fool.

[@chrissmith7669]

Many helicopters use the translational lift effect during climb out.

[@TriBanyu]

Bagus

[@williamkennedy3837]

The fold-up feature of the Osprey is impressive, should have been shown.

[@benbuckley9786]

Have y'all ever shot a bird with a rifle? The pentagon wants more dead soldiers. Hello russian and Chinese sams.

[@minecraftblockychris8708]

@@benbuckley9786 lmfao ydk about counter measures or jammers ?

[@zbigniewteterycz1571]

SUPER IDEA . POZDRAWIAM.

[@samempstreet379]

Vtol helicopters its amazing

[@martinmm7101]

Im not any expert or something but arent all helicopters VTOL? cus VTOL stands for "vertical take off and landing" and im pretty sure normal helicopters can do that

[@floppyglot]

Generally I think VTOL refers to vehicles capable of both vertical L/T and using a runway. I don't usually see helicopters using a runway. I think. Because helicopter only really perform vertical.

[@huntermitchell761]

As someone else said, not all vertical take off aircraft are helicopters. Helicopters are a subset of VTOL.

[@wonghonkongjames4495]

Oh Lord Please Don't Let Me Be Misunderstood ！ Please be informed that they're talking about the Traditional Helicopter here which means it has to be slightly tilted its body to propell forward But the TiltRotor doesn't have to do that cos it can propell forward horizontally for it's got wings and tilt rotors！My friend However the description heading can add the 'planes' after the 'VTOL Helicopter'

[@83btm]

@@huntermitchell761...but every single helicopter that's ever existed is already a VTOL vehicle, by design. That's why saying "VTOL helicopter" is silly and redundant, and makes about as much sense as saying "rolling car" or "flying airplane," as others have already commented.

[@sarahtonin8144]

‘’Courage taught me no matter how bad a crisis gets ... any sound investment will eventually pay off."

[@cryptocasey1083]

Making it out at a young age is quite difficult. I started a side hustle at 17, saved up and made some good investments. l'm 28,live on my own and having a good life for myself. Big ups to you and everyone out there trying

[@mav3420]

Sounds like plan, how do you put money to work?

[@cryptocasey1083]

@@mav3420 Yes it sure is. I put in money in investments and get profits. That 's how I make more money without working. This does not sound new to you right ?

[@mav3420]

@@cryptocasey1083 Thanks for replying me, I've heard so many people talk about investment but none had said how to do it right.

[@kathyfrugalsen3047]

Am hoping on you can explain more on how you make extra income from investments

[@kailashpatirai]

Wau.. i like this kind of flying vehicle

[@harry2110]

Please change your clickbait image as I got super excited that we were gonna have IRL SA-2 Samsons!

[@corwinzelazney5312]

Same reaction. I wish KZbin had penalties for BS clickbait thumbnails.

[@jean-marcfournier4904]

Le F35 en phase posé, quelle belle cible !

[@Gravity_studioss]

When I first saw the V22 osprey, I immediately thought: "Why do they lack side doors?" Glad to see that this model fixed that now

[@n3v3rforgott3n9]

They lacked them on the Osprey for a few reasons. One of them being that there is a dangerous exhaust coming from below the nacelles as it lands and takes off so loading people from the side could be dangerous. Secondly the Osprey is a cargo platform as well so it needs a back access ramp for cargo.

[@chrissmith7669]

They have a forward crew door just like the CH53, CH47, & CH46.

[@sydneystout4003]

V-280 already selected!

[@alexgram4345]

The teaser picture of the video, looks just like the vtol's from avatar - but no, no, a whole video of clumsy and clunky vtols ;)

[@dougadams9419]

Thumbnail. C'mon Man! That's the aircraft from Avatar! Video is about the V-22 Osprey and other designs.

[@glenn2452]

thats what I was thinking Click Bait

[@Gunni1972]

VTOL Helicopters are kinda old-fashioned. Couldn't it be something more Extravagant for "next Gen"?

[@hi-q2261]

I'm sorry to say that these things look incredibly dangerous, if your soldiers evacuating the vehicle and then suddenly something hit the vehicle and it spins out of control you're going to get sliced and diced in the rota 😟 I suggest at some point in the future they replace the rotors with some sort of a jet engine

[@floppyglot]

Actually there is no more danger with this aircraft than a helicopter or any other fixed wing propeller aircraft with propellers low to the ground. It's unlikely that any infantry would leave the aircraft when its propellers are in a downward position anyway for exactly that reason. Regardless if something hits an aircraft with enough speed to forcibly tip it over or send it flying everyone is generally going to be f'd anyway. Whether it be a helicopter or fixed wing. Also I believe that there are some plans or something to actually put jets on the wings but not for a while.

[@thomasdouglas7525]

You understand classic helicopters have that exact issue if the tail rotor is damaged the helicopter spins uncontrollably

[@kdrapertrucker]

Jet engines need a very firm surface for V/still, they have to retrofit flight decks on ships operating F-35 because the Jet engine would blast a hole in the flight deck if they didn't. You can't even land on a no paved surface because the Jet blast would blast a crater. There are just some jobs that Jet engines do not do very well. Plus jet engines have large suction, and blast zones zones. To see the suction of a jet engine look on KZbin for footage of a U.S. Navy flight deck crewman getting sucked into an A-6 intruder engine. Luckily for the crewman he was carrying a tie down chain that went into the engine before he did. He survived.

[@aidangioiosa6506]

That’s not a good idea because it would be so fast that it would lose its troop capability

[@user-pq4by2rq9y]

For it to spin out of control you would need to cut off a rotor. The Valor should actually have enough power to hover on a single engine because it weighs about half as much as the Osprey.

[@jelisumichannel]

Legendary Heli moder warship

[@baz8887]

Nothing to do with the advertising picture then

[@harry2110]

Thats a samson sa-2

[@CamoCrusader117]

Wouldn’t the radar signature on a vtol be massive

[@Flame-istic-usern]

Yea sure but it won't work for thermal signature radar but the radar signature for vtols are small if you decide to do that in the 35B it wouldn't even be seen In normal and thermal signature radar

[@huntermitchell761]

These aren't designed to operate in heavily contested airspace. That's what the F35 et al is for--clearing out enemy air defenses and fighters to make way for other aircraft.

[@JG-ic3py]

Which VTOL are you asking about and "massive" compared to what? There's nothing inherent in a VTOL that chances radar signature much compared to the same non-VTOL aircraft. An F-35B for example doesn't have a massively different radar signature than the non-VTOL versions like the F-35A or F-35C. The covers and louvers that assist in redirecting the thrust for vertical flight might increase radar signature a bit while they are open, but I can't imagine many circumstances where you'd be using an F-35B in vertical flight while in the enemy's radar envelope in the first place.

[@herterherter442]

vertical system and hight capacity to applied is the best.

[@hardeepdhillon2791]

Paw patrol plane

[@toncastanho]

Um dúvida: o raio de giro das hélices do V-280 Valor permite que seja colocado sobre a cabine, o radar do E-2 Hawkeye?? Faria com que esse tipo de radar pudesse ser utilizado em porta helicópteros (mesmo que este não seja marítimo, nem pensado para atuar em embarcações por suas hélices e "braços de sustentação" não serem retráteis, entre outros motivos). O mesmo raciocínio valeria para o V-22 Osprey, mas parece financeiramente absurdo.

[@army2362]

This new us army helicopter can fly on its own without a pilot! That is huge plus no helicopter today can do that!

[@TexanIthorian]

God bless the Enclave.

[@Justwantahover]

7:40 Except only the Valor can have the advantage of that fuslage shape. It's a fting fuselage! Won't lift on the Black Hawk, though. 😅

[@n3v3rforgott3n9]

The Valor is faster, flies further, carries more troops, carried a larger load, has a better time to altitude, and a better deceleration time from cruise speed.

[@michaelnorris4629]

What is the difference between VTOL and a helicopter?

[@patrickkenyon2326]

All helicopters are VTOL. Some VTOLs are not helicopters. Example: Harrier jet.

[@lill4nd090]

ah yes! big brain time :)

[@frediejovellano8666]

You can create Drone chopper Jet design!

[@All_Hail_Chael]

VTOL Helicopter? A helicopter that can take off and land vertically? What ever will they think of next.

[@tazanteflight8670]

The Valor is the best looking aircraft, since Airwolf.

[@AirstripBum]

But when it takes off they must play the theme song or they have to land and start over.

[@KB325i]

Bro a vtol helicopter no wayyy Fr?

[@frankshannon3235]

Tell me that AI created that title. Surely it wasn't a human.

[@cs1841]

Must have more missiles to tanks ! ! !

[@davidjohnston9169]

These have been in movies for 10 years

[@Schlipperschlopper]

Germans had this during WW2 Weserflug P1003-1

[@chrissmith7669]

Fa-269 was the tilt rotor in development by Focke.

[@Schlipperschlopper]

no it was a Weserflug company development@@chrissmith7669

[@vedyou799]

Good and wonderful work, but the maneuverability is not high and the propellers are very large. This can be corrected by reducing the size of the propellers and adding two propellers in the wings, but the problem is in placing them, and here is a sign?

[@n3v3rforgott3n9]

... it passed the same level 1 handling requirements the Blackhawk passed.

[@chickenbuttdeluxe]

It would certainly appear that SOMEONE has watched Avatar WAY too many times

[@hankakah4180]

Reminds me of the choppers used in the movie Avatar.

[@corwinzelazney5312]

Except they never show that design anywhere in the video.

[@michaelyoung7261]

I was disappointed by the promise of the thumbnail being the chopper from Cameron’s Avatar (blue people) and then was further disappointed by the lack of input from some of the mechanics who work on the craft shown. I had a coworker who is an aircraft mechanic in the military and he told me that everyone he’s chatted with hates working maintenance on the Osprey. We both agreed that it’s a great bird and a very good airframe, but he’s told me that some of the nitty gritty details of maintenance for all airframe is not enjoyable to most of the mechanics.

[@ericclausen6772]

5 to 7 great job

[@michaelle8558]

hoat dong bang loai nang luong vinh cuu .,

[@Lancersilva]

One step closer to getting the Falcon from Reach

[@joseroberto8328]

eu não consigo entender como esse veiculo consegue se manter equilibrado no eixo de sustentação

[@calebpoemoceah3087]

Terminator 2 movie had one of those with jet engines instead of blades

[@n3v3rforgott3n9]

Yes because it is scifi and not reality...

[@elylanier]

Sorry for the auto correct

[@mcbishopuk]

Despite the thumbnail, no ducted fan aircraft were discussed in this video. Misleading.

[@HardSarge]

:14 what airfield is that ?

[@yodaz101]

About time...In Afghanistan we had real issues. The choppers could get high enough, not fast enough, not enough range... The choppers we had are Vietnam era or 80s the air frames we're wearing out.

[@chrissmith7669]

Most of our rotary winged fleets were designed to operate in the cool low altitude of Central Europe. They weren’t intended for hot and high where engine power drops like a rock with altitude.

[@brianpaton6687]

To move forward a helicopter directs some of it's thrust forward. That would make the helicopter go backwards.

[@dougadams9419]

1:15 He didn't understand the cyclic control of a helicopter rotor. The rotor tilts FORWARD to direct the helicopter forward. Acting like a very large propeller while still providing lift. The cyclic can move the main rotor in any direction by a few degrees to move forward, backward or side to side.

[@shawntepitts488]

I'm in

[@user-uk1zt2xp3i]

កេីតជាមនុស្សស្គាល់អេាយអស់

[@aksilirongames]

а не дороговато для 1 штуки ?

[@bluedot7817]

My mother was a rotorcraft, my father quite plane, I've grown into an average looking helicopter parent.

[@davidcrandall4958]

This is a Hollywood stock Photo

[@securmaldas6765]

PLEASE!!! Avatar Vtol Helikopter!!!

[@user-wy6ig8hk5t]

جميل جدن الولايات المتحده الامريكيه هيه صديقه جمهوريه العراقيه

[@FernandoManciniVillela]

A aeronave VTOL de mais de um rotor com mais de um motor é mais silenciosa, mais segura e mais barata.

[@kwinter2541]

Aw yeah i fuckin· love vertibirds #Enclave #MarineMechanics

[@kevinlemon6537]

Need to watch sci-fi films like Oblivion . Try And copy that !!!

[@a-fl-man640]

what the hell is a nas cell , i'm familiar with na cells ( nacelles )

[@cityplanconsultores2188]

en el minuto 1:16 es un helicoptero KAMOV???

[@ericb.4358]

The newest Bell tilt rotor will be the replacement for the high maintenance Osprey. But the Sikorsky Defiant twin rotor and "pusher" prop helicopter will replace the long-serving Blackhawk chopper. The Army will chose BOTH for different missions. And the Marines will chose the Bell V-289. GENTLEMEN: THE OSPREY HAS HAD TOO MANY GEAR RELATED PROBLEMS TO COUNT IT AS RELIABLEAS SAY, THE CHINOOK. IT IS A WIDOWMAKER.

[@elijah-typhelps9323]

Negative the army chose the v280.

[@ericb.4358]

My nephew is a civilian on the selection panel and the selection has NOT been done yet.

[@elijah-typhelps9323]

@@ericb.4358 it definitely has. You can literally look it up on any military magazine or website

[@user-pq4by2rq9y]

I think you really did mixed things up. The Valor and and the Defiant were both being considered as a replacement to the blackhawk. Valor won FLRAA because it actually met its goals. That said, Sikorsky is contesting the decision. While the Defiant is out of the race for now, the Raider is still in the fight for FARA and it looks more promising.

[@elijah-typhelps9323]

@@user-pq4by2rq9y exactly. Thank you.

[@stevehansraj4730]

Helicopters are already vtol

[@user-mn2di8je1r]

この手の飛行機の原型は　マットジャイロだわ

[@mahendramobileshop8891]

😊😊😊😊

[@RichardShelton]

Manned/unmanned term soon to be replace by person/unperson. What a crazy world.

[@taotao98103]

why can't they have two sets of engines? one set for take off and landing, one set for jet flying.

[@juliocesardemoraesbarros5585]

I can solv The problem for de inconvenient coses by flayin whit only 1 rotor.

[@mrfitz96]

Lots of little tells that the "author" of this script has no real idea about this stuff. Cut and paste content delivered by text to speech software.

[@diablomadvanced]

vtol helicopter? since when helicopter is not vtol?

[@jethroorhtej4126]

They have been working on vtol for 50 years. Helicopters are still way more usefull for most situations. The osprey tends to kill its crew.

[@n3v3rforgott3n9]

The Osprey is one of the safest aircraft the navy flies. Look up the stats and you will see it crashes less than the majority of military aircraft. More people have died in C-130s in the last 10 years than the Osprey and we use more Ospreys.

[@ericclausen6772]

Why isn't America putting up vehicles with four or more blades around it like drones you can buy only a lot larger

[@floppyglot]

Fuel and maintenance

[@huntermitchell761]

Gas powered Drone style motors are not as good at lifting heavy equipment because the motors have to be much smaller to fit in such a distributed manner. There also simply aren't electric motors big enough and efficient enough for this task. Also quad style aircraft are not as fast yet. Gas turbines and jet engines with larger propellers are much better.

[@davidjrule66]

I think what will been needed is Nacelle to have electric motor and the jet engine move closing to the air fame.

[@chrissmith7669]

There have been proposals to put the engines in a pod over the fuselage driving the rotors via the central driveshaft

[@TriPham-sn9jj]

If we enclose the rotor and blades in a protective rings and screen to protect it and thicker so if lose power it can still hovering by it's own counter to falling rate so it can fly or land with out power and an add on steam jet in the middle to assist lift

[@inoname99]

Nice cartoon, who is holding the camera?

[@n3v3rforgott3n9]

Another aircraft or drone... not the brightest are you?

[@johnferry7778]

Where is the vehicle in the thumbnail? Total rip off.

[@FirstnameLastname-wt5sd]

Why no tilt jet?

[@n3v3rforgott3n9]

A turboprop engine is a jet engine technically.

[@trakmas9915]

so, these VTOL helicopters work on eletricity or fuel?

[@michaelle8558]

chiec tich thang 2 canh chong len troi` do' , doi lai thang chiec co dong co nang chan khong ben duoi day them dong co nang chan khong nua , 2 dong co day nang 2 ben chia xuong bay di quay len day nhung dung co giay qua 2 ben vua` vua` , tay nghe khong giay kich hoat bang giong noi dinh vi , ket noi' co gi goi la bay den roi bay ve , bay di bay ve` ., co' dong co nang chan khong leong roi` , may cai dong co nang chan khong leong hinh chu nhat duoi' day tich thang .,

[@verynurcahyadi8091]

Kesuwun ya no

[@ayatullah2936]

Phobias future and simple and oneshot finish

[@bluelinepatriot]

All helicopters are VTOL

[@adrianoferreira994]

Avatar vehicle kkkkkk

[@Everyday_Foreman]

The first iteration of this is the Osprey which spends a lot time crashing into the ground whereby we have a lot of personel to this date. The Osprey was rushed into production without fixing all the problems and lots of military people are now dead.

[@AsuraDandy]

As opposed to the other times military personal die from accidents in other helicopters. The only reason the Osprey gets alot of heat is because it happened during the early years, so the first impressions went off to a pretty bad start so it got a bad reputation. In actuality, the Osprey actually has less accidental non combat deaths than the Blackhawk during its first 20 years.

[@chrissmith7669]

Osprey doesn’t spend “lots of time crashing”. It has an accident rate inline with other tactical aircraft.

[@christopherdean1326]

Aren't ALL helicopters VTOL?

[@ericclausen6772]

Why didn't we put two sets of propellers counter rotation like our new helicopters wouldn't doing that give it a higher lift capability and be able to take more to the front lines of the battlefield

[@NXTangl]

That would be an increase in complexity of an already extremely complicated system for marginal benefit. You can't "just" up the thrust by adding additional rotors, you would need to reinforce the wings to take the load, increase engine capacity to drive what is likely now a less efficient rotor setup, increase fuel weight to keep the same range, and so on. Since the rotors are already torque-balanced, it just doesn't make much sense.

[@MrJBA79]

I just can't this text to speech engine.. f-that noise.

[@user-th3we1no3b]

При поражении или отказе одного двигателя, уцелеть ни единого шанса.

[@cec7296]

サムネイルの機体が出てこなくてがっかり

[@ambientsoda106]

yeh I think you can replace fans with jet engine on rotating frame...this is all old tech seen here I think..

[@aveargeinfiniteflightplayer]

Well I recommend both and if you need a faster thing just get a turboprop with jet engines it's gonna be freaking fast also if you need to get above Mach 0.5 turn off turboprop or maybe make a special bay to contain it then jet engine on and boom MACH 1.

[@n3v3rforgott3n9]

a normal jet engine is VERY inefficient at low speeds. You thinking otherwise is because your only information comes from scifi films... leave this shit to experts.

[@ambientsoda106]

@@n3v3rforgott3n9 your wrong we see fighter jet technology, and its clear a jet engine can be used to both hover and move at much much higher speeds in the upper atmosphere... And and with newer adaptations, I believe a jet engine will evolve... I'm not sure what kind of expert you are? But as I said I think by thinking on how a jet engine could be augmented, and how a electro magnetic system could also be used to augment a fighter plane maybe is the answer to all this malarkey..

[@n3v3rforgott3n9]

@@ambientsoda106 what jet is used to hover?

[@ambientsoda106]

@@n3v3rforgott3n9 sooo some fighter planes can hover, but in regards to UFO I'm talking about a similar system of propulsion but augmented...that the idea of a jet engine could be augments for more propulsion, such as using a microwave in the ignition section of the jet engine, and then, start targeting fuels oscilitation levels and use the fuel in an em state...eventually plasma could be used to create warp bubble or a form of hyper drive.. I also believe magnets with antenna configurations were used to create lift or movement..again augmenting a initial system using a jet engine as jet engine is essentially a warp drive in its most basic form.

[@renzo0012]

The normal helicopter can vtol too why new is vtol too

[@83btm]

"VTOL Helicopter" is nonsensically redundant, as every helicopter that's ever existed is a VTOL vehicle, by design. It's like calling an automobile a 'rolling car.'

[@jmantwild9373]

Click bate. The helicopter in the picture isn't in this video. I skipped threw and looked

[@Thel_Vadamee]

“Very slowly” *shows helicopter zipping at extremely high speeds* I swear the way this video is worded makes it sound like the dude hates helicopters because they’re “slow” (Btw modern military helicopters can mid air refuel with jet engine tankers)

[@huntermitchell761]

They are slow. The army program behind these aircraft specifically requires them to fly much faster than current helicopters. The advantages of flying faster include but are not limited to: increased evasion of air defenses and enemy fire, faster reaction and relocation time, and faster mission execution.

[@Thel_Vadamee]

@@huntermitchell761 are you disagreeing or what, I’m confused

[@eiland369]

All helicopters are VTOL…

[@themusicking4365]

Excuse me did you just say vtol helicopter