NHL Worst Plays Of The Week: HOW DOES THAT GOAL COUNT!? | Steve's Dang-Its

[@HatsuneChiYu]

YOU CAN'T RELEASE THIS 5 MINUTES BEFORE A GAME STEVE

[@carlblaxland3640]

Lol facts

[@tishandmarkbacks4563]

to be fair, it was more like 15 minutes but still, it's an 18 minute long video - so we couldn't even watch it during intermission. :)

[@StonedSpagooter]

AND THEY DO IT WITH EVERY PODCAST LIKE STAHP

[@HatsuneChiYu]

@@tishandmarkbacks4563 true, but I like watching the pre-game stuff so 😂 had to wait 'till end of the game smh

[@HatsuneChiYu]

@lulu belle I'm purposefully blaming Steve because he's a Leafs fan

[@tkirchmann]

I feel like when you order a copy of the NHL rulebook it should come with a complementary pack of dice and a crystal ball. Just seems fair.

[@njdss4]

You can take Larsson out of New Jersey, but you can't take the New Jersey out of Larsson.

[@zs3335]

Too true

[@Heytherebuds]

Those were dark years for NJ. I think they're behind them now

[@rafaelxamorim9816]

At least edmonton won

[@ИльяГостеев-ц9э]

@@Heytherebuds Dark years of Stanley Cup final

[@Heytherebuds]

@@ИльяГостеев-ц9э they have a promising young team

[@jasonsigler3053]

Lmao Carolina played “how bizarre” after the offsides call

[@emhrnndz9]

It was Columbus!

[@LFCtvUSA]

It was Columbus, but still, great shout.

[@sinergy111]

It's offside, not offsides

[@BrickWorldPictures]

17:19 Steve: "Lots of yelling, not my style." Me: Um, Steve, are you okay?

[@davyt0247]

They lost to a 42 year old Zamboni driver who works for them!!!

[@maryrowe1616]

That never gets old!!

[@davyt0247]

@Potato HEAD nah, I just love that they managed to do that.

[@jaideepbura1936]

Welcome to the NHL where we literally make up stuff as we go along...

[@samjovz2748]

and the points don't matter!!...... wait....

[@Pensfan5919]

@@samjovz2748 The points are like Kris Letang's Norris chances, they don't matter.

[@andrewd6373]

"Never half-ass two things. Whole-ass one thing"

[@alexperry06]

Whistlin diesel?

[@TheShaggster37]

I honestly feel like that penalty shot was a sympathy gift from the refs for screwing up the offside challenge.

[@AlexBilar]

Except the penelty shot was before the other screw up Edit: didn't realize they were two different games

[@jakethejacketsfanYT]

@@AlexBilar no, the penalty shot was the game after the offside screw up

[@AlexBilar]

@@jakethejacketsfanYT ooooh it wasnt even the same game, my bad.

[@jordanhunter3433]

I’d disagree with letting the goal or the penalty stay, this wasn’t just a missed call this was a technical failure. If the clock suddenly stopped we don’t just keep playing until it works

[@codeman99-dev]

Solid argument. I wonder if they should do away with the headset right now and just have review guys appear on the jumbo screen.

[@Jason-rk4nd]

This is the nhl officiatiing system. If you bet against them doing the right thing youd be a rich person.

[@randallstokes3684]

I wouldn't call it a technical failure. Nothing failed, it was human error. I feel like it was more of the official jumping the gun. Yes he heard someone say it was a goal, but I definitely feel like there should be a confirmation of that when deciding these things. Calling the goal on the first thing you hear in the headset without confirming what you've heard seems reckless to me.

[@metalheadcol]

Oh that will be the next thing that will happen, wonder how long it will take before anyone realises 😂😂 also what if it happened with 1 second left in regulation in a Stanley cup finals game 7 and the clock stopped for say 10 seconds then someone rips the cup winner home, just imagine Toronto disconnecting all their comms and hiding away wondering how to address that scenario 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@jayd5541]

"If the clock suddenly stopped we don’t just keep playing until it works" You mean exactly how the Kings scored a goal against the CBJ in 2012 with 0.4 on the clock, *after* the clock was stopped by human input with 1.8 seconds left in the 3rd period of a 2-2 game for 0.8 seconds? Meaning the game *SHOULD HAVE* ended with 0.8 showing on the clock, per the same Colin Campbell who came out and said there had been no precedent to reverse a penalty call after video review of the play in question? bleacherreport.com/articles/1051541-nhl-investigation-into-clock-irregularity-kings-goal-was-no-good

[@XaviRonaldo0]

I can't believe the embellishment call on the Rangers player didn't make the list. I'm a Caps fan and I think that was one of the most ridiculous calls I've ever seen.

[@ZJC922]

Oh I can’t wait to see what he says about Rask last night

[@jacobboaden2213]

My first thought aswell.

[@bfrazer4126]

That was hilarious. His smile as they went into OT was priceless.

[@viperswhip]

JT Miller wasn't even trying that game, that's why he was staring him down. He deserved it.

[@Scoots_McGee]

Yeah that backcheck wasnt for for timbits hockey, but Holtby did give it directly to Matthews, not a good thing to do lol

[@zip5644]

@@Scoots_McGee Miller was in front of Matthews until Holtby tried clearing it. That's all on Miller.

[@jordandrumming694]

Jt Miller literature called for the pass too and gave up

[@peopleschamp7070]

If I was a goalie I'd stare down JT as well. At least Larsson was trying and working hard to stop Dadanov rather than just letting him walk in

[@Scoots_McGee]

Sure that backcheck wasnt fit for timbits hockey but Holtby gave it right to Matthews, that's not a good play either lol

[@peopleschamp7070]

@@Scoots_McGee it's a routine play for the goalie to make it happens every game when the goalie sends the puck to the boards for a scramble and your back checkers get it. It only looks really bad when your players give up on the play

[@rafaelxamorim9816]

True

[@louiebili17yearsagoedited85]

@@peopleschamp7070 Miller was never there to receive that pass. It’s Holtbys fault for passing it to Mathews. Just because your defenseman should be there doesn’t mean you put the puck there when he isn’t

[@alexe606]

So the guy in the booth talked to himself going “ok thats onside” whilst switching to another angle, ref interpreted that as “aHA good goal”. All this from talking to yourself. What a mess

[@MaxtheMonster13]

Did he just say “ok that’s onside”? Because I have also heard that he said “that’s onside, that’s a good goal” which makes it a little more understandable why the ref just believed them, although I still think that refs should check with more than one person when reviewing a goal before making the final decision

[@miroshkaheiskanen608]

The reason that that happened is because the call was a goal, so he has to prove that it is not a goal, and from that angle, he could not do that, so he was checking off angles like they are boxes.

[@MaxtheMonster13]

@@miroshkaheiskanen608 I understand how and why this happened, I just think that maybe the ref should double check and make sure that’s the right call before taking the headset off and making the call😂

[@alexe606]

@@miroshkaheiskanen608 Yeah. Just miscommunication

[@miroshkaheiskanen608]

I mean, when the league tells you it is a good goal, its a good goal every time... except this one

[@yeminadiv]

I love Steve dangle and his content

[@Ok-ik4ww]

This is sportsnet but ok

[@moneydynamicmatanya9541]

Turks Rask leaving the net in the final minute in the 3rd period of a 2-2 game should be a Dang-It!!

[@CRlMZlN]

If it led to a goal, yeah. But it didn't.

[@Garbox80]

@@CRlMZlN I was kinda expexting an honorable mention on that, because it was still a dang-it, although a funny one for all sides.

[@moneydynamicmatanya9541]

@@Garbox80 agreed

[@brendancramphorn44]

It was last week....

[@berubeacting5858]

Kind of surprised there isnt an optiom for the league to say "We goofed, so the penalty is gone, the goal is gone and we're going to add the last couple minutes of the second to the top of the third."

[@josiahharrison9843]

It’s kind of a double edged sword, because it takes a lot out of the viewing experience especially as a new viewer if something like that happened and the game gets bogged down with video reviews and referee calls. But that’s also what Steve was saying, when it’s almost worse that they did a half fix. No real right answer, but I just wish they’d be consistent with bs if there’s gonna be bs.

[@berubeacting5858]

@@josiahharrison9843 100%. But i think everybody would agree that in a case like this (colossal Dang-it level screw up by the league) eother move on like nothijg happened and say you messed up AFTER the game, or reset to the point of the error and replay from there. NFL actually has a rule for aituations like this, it why I brought it up in the first place.

[@LieuFang]

@@berubeacting5858 Yeah, that would have been the logical thing to do. Just like outside interference can negate a home run in baseball, outside interference should be able to negate a goal in hockey. I don't know why they were so worried about precedent when this was literally the first and only time this has happened. And the league is already implementing steps to prevent it from ever happening again. The only good thing that came out of this was the league was forced to confront a major weakness in their system. Just imagine if that guy had bet on the Canes or had Pesce or Trocheck on his fantasy team, the NHL would have the worst spotlight on them right now.

[@juhomantynen4638]

@@LieuFang like The Hockey Guy said: "I'm not saying that the video coordinator's last name is Brind'Amour but..."

[@Garbox80]

What if a ref calls that the puck didn't cross the line and the play continues, but it's a close call? Doesn't the "war room" check those automatically and can call the goal from there (or stop the play and call the refs to review)? Or was it just in the international tournaments or where the he*? Anyway, they then turn the clock back to the point when the goal was scored and go on from there. Actually it's the same if the other team challenges the call on the next stop. I don't see a problem with that because it's not like it happens in every game (reviews called by the refs, yeah, almost every game, but those that I mentioned...).

[@Jame5man]

Goalies playing the puck is routine. Happens literally in every game, has for years. But like every routine play, you only notice it when it goes wrong

[@Adri_Unsung]

No I notice it every time and it makes me clench every time. I also H A T E when goalies leave the net it makes me break out in hives

[@sirdragon9256]

Thank you, Steve, for your AWESOME videos. Love the hat-picks and dang-its. Keep up the GREAT work

[@TaMightyM00se]

Should add a "Steve's pick" for the biggest dang it of the week and give it a badge of dishonor.

[@bones343]

On the Holtby incident, two things. First, that backcheck by Miller was pathetic. Like really really pathetic. Second, I think the stare down was a culmination of how awful the Canucks defense has been for weeks. That defensive effort by Miller epitomized how bad they've been. And all that frustration from Holtby came out in that look.

[@lisaanimi]

Video coaches have really ruined the coahes challenge. I don't think there was any advatage for Trocheck in that play and nobody would have cared at all if video coaches wouldn't be trying to abuse replays to their favour. The whole challenge is to prevent things like Duchene goal, not to keep winding replays for finding few millimeters worth of "illegal play"

[@MikeParadigm]

At some point Steve is going to realize that his highest rated dang its videos involve long rants about items that involve the Hurricanes.....

[@mikeg4378]

Steve, my son and I were just talking about you on out way home from hockey practice. We both love your stuff...keep up the good work!

[@dmitryborsukovsky7160]

About Holts dang it. I was a bit surprised to see the puck making that kind of bounce of the board and landing perfectly flat on the ice. Especially after u see Holtby shooting it pretty high in the air. That was a very weird bounce for me.

[@kaylahix710]

I knew as soon as I heard about the offside goal that my Canes would be in this week's dang its. But I did not realize that would have 3 segments! And darn it Slavin! You are my favorite, I like to think you never mess up! Steve's MISTER SVECHNIKOV and "lots of yelling, not my style" had me rolling!

[@lostnumbr]

Your opinions of goalies playing the puck up until now were only mildly ignorant, but this one just proves that you know absolutely nothing about goaltending or defensive hockey all together. Neither of Holtby's back checkers gave him any options, the puck is going to reach him before anyone gets there, he doesn't even leave the front of the net to play it. His pass off the boards wasn't ideal but I'm blown away how none of his teammates got to a place where he could sent it to them clean. The dang it is on his d.

[@JanneAirDotCom]

YOU FIXED THE FOCUS!!

[@Mattoilers97]

Holtby doesn’t know what team he plays for now that’s a dang it

[@anonymous134y]

well he went from a winning team to a canadian team. Canadian teams are just embarrassing to canadians lol

[@alexe606]

@@anonymous134y Really are. Sorry

[@Mattoilers97]

@@anonymous134y and why is that?

[@scoldingwhisper]

@@Mattoilers97 because they suck lmao. oilers fans should know more than anyone

[@anonymous134y]

@@scoldingwhisper exactly. Look at the player points too. Once the canadian teams start playing real teams they won't be so far ahead being point leaders. Sad for us canadians who like hockey more than anyone lol

[@robrick9361]

3:58 Referring to someone who hasn't scored in 3 games as "pointless in his last 3" is one of the funniest accidental double entendres ever.

[@TheEDFLegacy]

Brayden Holtby has the greatest "WTF" stare I've ever seen. And you see it ALL. THE. TIME.

[@elizabethmarkulic2476]

Thanks for these. The Carolina Columbus games were... Interesting to watch as a Canes fan to say the least??!!

[@zip5644]

Holtby didn't make a mistake on that play, he made the right play but Miller wasn't skating. Same goes for Chatfield who is awful.

[@Atreuzs]

Thanks Steve! Your dang it clips and Shaqtin' a Fool are the best sport clips! It's just incredibly funny every time. Thanks!

[@brettaxon]

I’m with holtby on that one

[@pachidermo]

Now, from a "what my brain says to me" perspective, I know that Larson own-goal is a bad thing. But like insofar as scored goals go, that was a beautiful top-shelf contested back-hander and *would* have been a hat pick if he'd placed the puck into the correct net.

[@Kinvarus1]

That in and of itself is a dang it. Also the whole point is that things aren't done before...until somebody does it. Just like with the penalty, it hadn't been done before until they did it in that game. To then use the same excuse for not taking the goal off the board is ridiculous. It's literally a case of: NHL: Well we can't take the goal off the board because it's never been done before. Everybody: Well neither has cancelling a penalty midway through it because you got the call wrong been done before...until now when you just did it, so what's the difference? NHL: There is no difference. Everybody: So for the first time, like with the penalty, take the goal off the board. NHL: No. Everybody: Why? NHL: Because it's never been done before.

[@evman1094]

I know this isn't the play pretty much ANYONE is here to discuss but, Lets run through the Penalty Shot Criteria they teach you literally 10 minutes into your first Officiating Clinic, keep in mind all of these criteria MUST be met to award a Penalty Shot: 1. Is [Cam Atkinson] fouled from behind? - Yes, Teravainen dove forward to hook Atkinson 2. Is [Cam Atkinson] in either the Offensive or Neutral Zone at the time of the infraction? - Yes 3. Is there any player between [Cam Atkinson] & the [Carolina] Goaltender? - No, Dougie Hamilton is technically beside him but far enough away to be considered a backchecker & not a defender 4. Is [Cam Atkinson] denied a clear scoring opportunity as a direct result of the infraction? No, as stated below since Atkinson is not in possession of the puck the position he is in cannot be declared a "clear scoring opportunity". 5. Does [Cam Atkinson] have full possession and control of the puck at the time of the infraction? - No, Atkinson pushes the puck out of his reach while attempting to break the zone and is therefore not in possession of the puck when Teravainen commits the infraction As a result of failing to meet 2 of the 5 criteria Atkinson should not have been awarded a penalty shot on this play. Teravainen should have been awarded 2 minutes for hooking(Not a fan of either team just a veteran referee & self-proclaimed analyst)

[@maniac2323]

Imagine the Leafs lose the cup due to a decision like that. Steve would probably die.

[@ajyu7289]

You would be able to hear him from Sasketchewan

[@Mymainelife87]

Imagine the leafs making it to the finals. That’ll never happen

[@world_thxnder2453]

Well. 1993 Gretzky's famous missed call in game 6. Look it up, I'm sure leafs fans know what it is

[@agentmassa3618]

@@world_thxnder2453 Also remember the Leafs still had a chance in Game 7 but choked that too 😂😂😂

[@colinmazzella7948]

Kaapo kakko embellishment call last week was a big time Dang it

[@XaviRonaldo0]

Caps fan here and I agree.

[@Aine-b4r]

Kaapo kakko is my favorite player

[@FathomMane]

I love your Dang it videos... I find them funny... Also just fun to watch in general

[@jasperwoodard8134]

You know what, I get it. You want the rules to make a shred of sense. But I think saying screw it and making the unpopular compromise is a bit underrated.

[@rodchallis8031]

Of course, the big question Carolina/Blue Jackets call brings up, is who was the person who gave the impression to others that it's "Offsides" when it's "Offside." For the love of god, people, stop saying "Offsides".

[@saskcch]

You decided to rescind a penalty that was wrongly awarded? *Las Vegas Golden Knights have entered the chat*

[@magnuszebitzsteiness8759]

You can use Tuukka Rask going to the bench in a tie game, next week.

[@jordandrumming694]

The holtby one is not Holly's fault at alllllll like his team isn't even in a position to get the pass also jt Miller CALLED FOR THE PASS and gave no effort at all the Canucks were being way to lazy on this. Also also jt Miller beaks off at holty two plays later where if a goalie did that he'd get ripped into, it always has to be the goalies fault look at the rest of the sgit around him

[@iron60bitch62]

Wow the NHL is turning into major league baseball

[@raychoi1391]

I wonder if anyone has posted. That’s the new rule: Change to offside rule for 2020-21 NHL season The NHL also announced one fairly significant rule change for this season, and it will impact how offsides is enforced. Starting this season, players will no longer have to have their skate in contact with the blue line to remain onside. The blue line now becomes a vertical plane.

[@markus1993100]

The commentary said tough sequence: its not. The CBJ defense man call it out during the play ref blew the whistle which means the goal stays and delay of game. If a player has a quick site on a play delaying the offensive advance in the zone. He is still credited to pause play. Players are not refs. So ref decided to give the 2 min minor to Columbus Blue Jackets delay of game because the player saw it so the opposing team would delay on the advance in the zone.

[@world_thxnder2453]

You need to throw a dangit at the rangers as a whole right now. Zibanejad: 1 goal 11 games. Lafreniere: 1 goal. Kakko: 3 points. Panarin being the only semi-consistent player. Both goalies underwhelming.

[@Krokodilius]

columbus is a fringe team and that goal may've cost em a point or two. the biggest shame of the whole thing is: we didn't get a return of johnny classique.

[@justusnixx]

its not Holtby "staring down" someone, it's just Holtby being in Holtby's head. He's not seeing anyone. He's focusing inside after goals. Trust me, I'm a Capitals fan/

[@mrutherford1106]

As a Hurricanes fan, I am disappointed in the league for counting that offsides goal. However, the penalty shot that was awarded to the Jackets in the next game was also awful. The referees called it a penalty shot when it was on the Jackets side of the red line, which isn't supposed to happen, according to the rulebook. So, Blue Jackets fans, what I guess I'm trying to say is: *DON'T COMPLAIN ABOUT THE OFFSIDES GOAL, YOU GOT A FREEBIE TOO* Edit: I would also like to point out that while in the game where Carolina got a free goal, they won by one. While Columbus got a free penalty shot that led to a goal, *they* won by one.

[@danielalcorn9761]

It is a rule though. Cam Atkinson specifically talked about it in his post game press conference where he asked the officials why he got the penalty shot and they explained the rule to him.

[@diggsfather]

puck doesnt lie

[@danielalcorn9761]

Not saying it wasn't a terrible call though

[@markolitvic6981]

The legendary debate I'd pay to watch: John Tortorella vs Rod Brind'Amour

[@TylerAven10]

In my opinion, the goal should’ve counted, not because he was onside or anything involving how the decision room handled it. Simply, the goal should’ve counted because the missed offsides did not directly lead to the goal, and that’s what this rule was intended to fix. The blue jackets had multiple opportunities to clear and it was like 30 seconds after the zone entry. NHL, make the rule how it’s meant to be.

[@christiankerminen1041]

Waiting for tuukka rasks play in next weeks vid :D

[@Mudgie_]

Oh my god Rask thinking it’s 2 -1 against the rangers and going to the bench when it was actually tied at 2

[@blaze87b]

Nah, they didn't score, but it's definitely making Weird NHL

[@andrewalivaara6518]

Best dang it video i have seen.

[@dylanhoward4978]

Based on historical times where it's happened, it wouldn't be unreasonable to replay the CBJ/CAR game starting at 3-3 with 1:15 left in the 2nd. A person made a call who wasn't the person allowed to make that call. It'd be like if a fan dressed as a ref jumped on the ice and made a penalty call. It's an illegitimate play because they aren't the person who can do that. Historical context for restarting would be the time the NBA restarted a game because a ref gave people 3 technical fouls (you can only get 2 per person) so the game was restarted months later from the point where the first illegitimate technical was given.

[@redsunsleader]

As a Canucks fan, I 100% agree that Holtby F-d up, he was out of position and wasn't paying attention to the rest of the play, yes Miller was slow to back check but bank passing the puck to the blue line in that situation was a poor play on his part, either launch it for an icing or play I behind the net.

[@MrLT3685]

10:10 The song playing is "How Bizarre"by OMC thats just perfect. That arena DJ deserves to be on Hat Picks.

[@slovak4life1991]

Adam Larsson might not play for the Devils anymore, but he continues the Devils tradition of scoring on their own tender. It’s tough to be a fan of that team.

[@ShortGameDave]

Your video's are the best!!

[@AzureReborn]

Petition for Rask to be next on dang its

[@jihoffman27]

They didn’t review it a second time. The guy who’s mic was on wasn’t in the situation room, he was a communications person at the arena that wasn’t supposed to be speaking. I agree that they should’ve simply stuck to precedent - once the puck drops, that’s it - and left things alone and then said “we got it wrong.” If you take away that precedent you open up a massive can of worms that can’t be solved.

[@Ramuh.]

Surprised the McDavid Goaltender interference trip isn't a part of this episode.

[@XtraordinaryShots]

As a ref - if you have a call you can’t hesitate and change it. You have to stand by that.

[@linkan91H]

This is one of the best dang it's ever!

[@ThatCerberusGuy]

Full disclosure, I'm a Hurricanes fan, but if that goal had been reversed, and Columbus had scored it on us, I'd have been fine with it. The off side rule is ridiculous. Trocheck was off side by less than six inches, and it had literally no impact on the play. The rule was implemented to prevent Matt Duchene goals, not so we could spend half an hour figuring out where people's toes are

[@BrianDBoyd-do7iu]

I'd like to think Brayden Schenn just wanted to give his buddy Kuemper a chance to win his 100th NHL game.

[@VeggieTart]

As a Caps fan, I assure you this is hardly the first time Holts has turned over the puck like this. It made me want to tear my hair out when he did stuff like this.

[@picklenik9658]

Scoring on your own net is just the most Oilers thing ever, why must I be forsaken to cheer for this cursed franchise

[@JohnMcLoughlin06]

This was one of the funniest dang-it’s videos! 🤣

[@nicksojka7457]

Can we just eliminate that 2-game series with Columbus from existence?

[@kolasillers7776]

We could but imagine Columbus looses playoff spot within one point😂

[@DixieWolf8]

Leave Holts alone. He's been abused by his defense for at least 2 years now. Not completely the Canucks fault but he's got a lot of hurt to work through and somebody's gonna get them eyes.

[@danielnewby2255]

Everyone knows bad calls happen. Every player, every coach. Sometimes they go your way, and sometimes they don't. Letting the wrong call stand was less wrong because *BAD CALLS HAPPEN*, and that happens for everyone. Having a special "undo moment" for one team is beyond ridiculous.

[@setholson4451]

That comparison 😂😂

[@Diefenbaker57]

As Steve says "PICK A THING!" ...I also like what Nu-Jack of the Gangsta's said "Two wrongs don't make a Right...BUT THEY DAMN SURE MAKES US EVEN!"

[@larryditkoff7058]

I was listening to the CAR-CBJ game on the radio going home to watch the Super Bowl. I listened to CBJ radio announcers and they thought they were wrong when they heard it was a good goal. Only the next day did I learn what really happened. Unprecedented is right

[@fireninja110]

thrilled to see weber on this next week for scoring on his own net

[@mik-ws3zw]

holy 18 mins long. you missed probably about 3 extra dang its from that 2 game stand between Carolina and Columbus.

[@adamsgarlicpowder9717]

The “fight” and just the whole game in general was terrible my question is should that offsides delay I counted an it was 17 seconds later they scored so

[@elizabethmarkulic2476]

Yeah I agree... me being a Canes fan and witnessing both games on tv was just... Interesting??! To say the least!

[@jesstrask310]

i loved the way he explained the last one

[@ANDERSON-ps8fp]

Like when Brett Hull scored with his foot in the crease to win the cup lol, oh well karma bit back when he lost to Canada in the 2002 Olympics.

[@csolivais1979]

According to the NHL, it was a good goal because he had possession of the puck before he entered the crease.

[@ANDERSON-ps8fp]

@@csolivais1979 damn it Chad, let me have this one lol

[@csolivais1979]

@@ANDERSON-ps8fp oh, you are right. That was just the league covering it's ass. And you know they were for two reasons, one was they changed the rule after that, so that interference was only if you touched the goalie, and that people said that if that rule happened to win a cup the league wouldn't have the balls to rule it no goal. And well, you seen what happened.

[@platapus112]

Nice new lighting Steve!

[@boerhae]

You have the choice to either make it right or keep it consistent. The NHL managed to pick the worst of both worlds: Inconsistent and still incorrect.

[@thatJAWNraps]

Okay, i HAVE to know - why don't you call it 'Dangles Dang-Its' - is that just TOO perfect?

[@alyssinwilliams4570]

I accidentally walked out of a walmart carrying a 2L bottle of coca-cola... no one stopped me. I only realized it when I got to my bike and realized I didnt have a bag to hang off my handle-bars. AT that point I ran back inside and paid for it

[@derik5numbers591]

OKAY NO, you can not show the oilers scoring an own goal but also not show the leafs scoring an own goal with the oilers

[@lukerisko7601]

As a CBJ fan this is giving me Chicago vibes. . . .

[@greathoonta3461]

Larsson gave the breakaway AND scored on his own net, that’s the biggest dang it I’ve seen on this channel.

[@zdfrostbyte]

I love seeing my blue jackets on here every week

[@jc22558]

Bad play by Holtby, but an even worse effort on the backcheck by Miller and a terrible effort by the Canucks throughout the game. I'm pretty sure Holtby can stare at anyone he wants with his Vezina trophy and Stanley Cup ring. He was brought to Vancouver for his veteran leadership.

[@TacticalSchizo05]

Don't be mad at Carolina. Be mad at the NHL.

[@bruinsfan824]

awesome vid

[@HockeyGUY66871]

Im glad Torts kept his mouth shut. I bet he gets fined at least $100K if he says anything knowing his history.

[@JP_HKY_777]

Definitely one of the weirdest situations I’ve ever seen in the NHL!

[@melissatremblay5372]

Connor Brown's penalty where he just yeeted the puck down the ice. The way he throws his head back, he knew that was a dang-it

[@stevexclax]

Here's my 2 cents, I think the rules need to be fixed. The goal was scored well after the advantage from the missed offsides call was gone. With that, I'd call this a good goal.

[@kingofrebels22]

The issue there is that even though they lost the advantage, the offsides leads to a faceoff, that faceoff is a 50/50 winner. Essentially by saying "the advantage is gone so it shouldn't matter" it says that the 50% chance to win that face off doesnt matter, if Columbus wins that face off. The goal doesn't happen. Etc etc. That's my opinion on your opinion