NIETZSCHE Explained: Ecce Homo - Full Analysis

  Рет қаралды 35,361

Weltgeist

Weltgeist

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 105
@WeltgeistYT
@WeltgeistYT 2 жыл бұрын
Our entire analysis of Ecce Homo, Nietzsche's autobiography, in one full video. We know a lot of our subscribers prefer to wait until the full video is out to watch these, so enjoy! ▶ Support us on Patreon: www.patreon.com/WeltgeistYT
@babydragon2047
@babydragon2047 2 жыл бұрын
Hi. Can you please review my book? Link in my bio. Thanks.
@farzadfazeliani3958
@farzadfazeliani3958 2 жыл бұрын
Question: I'm interested in pursuing Nietzsche's ideas with a modern positive psych/neuroscience bend; any places/individuals who are actively doing this?
@siktwstd
@siktwstd 2 жыл бұрын
one of the most underrated youtube channels, i understand it can be a niche audience but i feel like this style of analysis video is really friendly to a variety of people. good job!
@havazmohammed485
@havazmohammed485 2 жыл бұрын
A "Nietzsche" audience
@sonnyjim5268
@sonnyjim5268 2 жыл бұрын
I agree.
@lukecash3500
@lukecash3500 2 жыл бұрын
Great analysis for philosophers many people sadly have no curiosity about or interest in because whatever is potentially dissonant with their world view isn't worth considering in people's minds.
@ShawnFamily-m4u
@ShawnFamily-m4u Жыл бұрын
The most important concept I ever learned when studying Nietzsche is this. You see, when Socrates, Aristotle, Kant, and most religions built a two-dimensional philosophy, Nietzsche on the other hand created a three-dimensional philosophy or religion. Aristotle and the rest created a list of principles or ideas that could easily be put into a chart or a list of principles. When reading Nietzsche on the other hand, you have to imagine a pool of stars on the ground. From this pool of stars rises and forms a humanoid. This humanoid of stars continues to form until it can run a few steps and then shatters into the puddle of stars again. This happens over and over again for an eternity. You see Nietzsche creates these stars by creating inverted and alternate concepts than the ones we believe in. He reaffirms healthy ideas and then creates their opposites. These create the Rorschach test you personally peer into eventually.
@cavaleer
@cavaleer 9 ай бұрын
This masterpiece is arguably my favorite of the old sages. It always makes me LOL . His prose, wit, humor and penetrating brilliance are in their best forms. I’ve never found it ironic or difficult or disingenuous.
@acardinalconsideration824
@acardinalconsideration824 2 жыл бұрын
The last book the man ever wrote before his descent into madness. Great upload, thank you
@ksix9359
@ksix9359 Жыл бұрын
if u only knew why he went mad lol
@jimc.goodfellas
@jimc.goodfellas 2 жыл бұрын
This is one of my favorite books and definitely one of the more underrated works..I feel like the artist is at the peak of his powers here...it's a shame what happened to him
@WeltgeistYT
@WeltgeistYT 2 жыл бұрын
Very underrated indeed
@blackfeatherstill348
@blackfeatherstill348 2 жыл бұрын
"body I am and nought besides". When I was younger as an artist this line by Nietzsche affected me, it brought me back to earth and to a recognition of the primacy of body over all other things.
@igorszopinski1822
@igorszopinski1822 Жыл бұрын
Best youtube channel. Man how hard it is to find intelligent people on you tube. Then Weltgeist comes along.
@Alseki7
@Alseki7 2 жыл бұрын
Great video. Have to agree with Nietzsche on how health and personality can affect world views/opinions. It's easy enough to see in oneself, how your perceptions and opinions change depending upon the setting, or recent events or activities.
@blazejsroka4319
@blazejsroka4319 Жыл бұрын
Thank you for a great analysis, after reading Beyond Good and Evil + Ecce Homo I appreciate all the lectures helping to expand my understanding of Nietzsche's works
@hypersonic676
@hypersonic676 7 ай бұрын
What a genius, there is no one like him.
@blackfeatherstill348
@blackfeatherstill348 2 жыл бұрын
This channel has become my favourite interpretation of Nietzsche other than Nietzsche himself.
@Mosaic631
@Mosaic631 2 жыл бұрын
This is one of the best analyses of Nietzsche in general that I’ve ever come across and could easily be understood by anyone with fleeting knowledge of philosophy in general as well. Fantastic job at attacking this and breaking it down. Enjoyed it!
@lordmyclin3671
@lordmyclin3671 2 жыл бұрын
Complex ideas, simply explained. Great analysis
@mikec6733
@mikec6733 2 жыл бұрын
I'd like to thank your Patrons, for enabling folks like me to enjoy content like this.
@rafaellontra2189
@rafaellontra2189 2 жыл бұрын
I like the nose/smell analogy. It's like a picture - it's worth a thousand words.
@robertcoltrane5602
@robertcoltrane5602 2 жыл бұрын
A philosophy justifies the personality of its creater.
@lucylle3132
@lucylle3132 2 жыл бұрын
I really love your videos and the way you help me understand the work of Neitzsche!
@christopherhamilton3621
@christopherhamilton3621 2 жыл бұрын
Lovely analysis! FN was a genuine contrarian skeptic & you captured this and his cheek perfectly. 😎
@JS-dt1tn
@JS-dt1tn Жыл бұрын
No! Not a skeptic! Reread ecce homo, especially "our virtues".
@pand1on712
@pand1on712 Жыл бұрын
out here saving my life with this!! excellent content, really well explained :)
@darrenparis8314
@darrenparis8314 2 жыл бұрын
Jeff Lynne found inspiration to write Mr. Blue Sky from the Alps.
@CoMa_84
@CoMa_84 Ай бұрын
I love these videos.
@patilbalian938
@patilbalian938 2 жыл бұрын
i don't understand Nietzsches determinate refusal of the hinterwelt and why he sees it as a decadent pursuit. humanity always had a penchant for concepts like god, spirit, virtue .... these abstract concepts had been with us since prehistory and served humanity in creating organized worldviews and to give meaning to their experiences. i'll check your video on the twilight of idols to understand his idea of decadence more. very accessible and well presented expose of Nietzsches philosophy, thank you.
@wordcel
@wordcel 2 жыл бұрын
I agree, but I think Nietzsche is not opposed to abstract concepts in general, but rather abstract concepts that negate life.
@thenowchurch6419
@thenowchurch6419 2 жыл бұрын
@@wordcel Being a writer and philosopher is already very abstract. We should not expect Nietzsche whom was struggling mentally, to be consistent.
@sonofcronos7831
@sonofcronos7831 2 жыл бұрын
Nietzsche is not against the ideia of god or spirit or virtue. He sees the civilization of Pre Socratic Greece and Pre Christian Rome as the best of civilizations. And they believed in gods, spirits and etc. BUT, they not negate life. To them, life was to me embraced, life is a pursuit of honor, pleasures and conquest. Virtue is made by the strong and the heroes. Even the post-life is a place of heroes and feasts (Elisium Fields). But Platonism, Christianity and Traditional Philososy views life as bad, they preach ascetism and a negation of pleasures and honor. They not embrace life, but condemns the world of the living. They dont make virtue, but preach morality and rationalism, because they have no power over others, only their mouths. And the post-life or the ideal world to them is everything that the world of the living is not. So not all religion is bad to Nietzsche, only the ones that attacks life and the material world.
@thenowchurch6419
@thenowchurch6419 2 жыл бұрын
@@sonofcronos7831 If you are in support of N's views on this then you make the same mistakes of over simplification that Nietzsche did, fatally for his mental health. The life of pre-Socratic Greece and pre-Christian Rome, were indeed that of physically stronger men generally than after, but that is because they were still more animalistic and less human, than the after periods. You look at the intellectual lost in his ivory tower and then proceed to condemn lofty thought, thought that sees beyond the mere physical survival and material success of this life. Christianity, Western Christianity in particular, was always corrupt, but had a civilizing and leveling effect among the masses of Europe. The corruption of the institution does not necessarily indict the spirituality and "philosophy" behind Christianity, which beats Schopenhauer's oblivion and Nietzsche's Eternal Recurrence by a long shot. N had been poisoned by Schopenhauer's atheism too deeply to realize that the subjective self is infinitely more vast and powerful than the mere physical brute and partakes in an Eternal Mind. Pre-Christians did not view life as good or bad, for they were simply involved in its gyrations instinctively. When Philosophy and Christianity, in their purer forms raised humanity above instinct, then the real work begins and many are the precipices we may fall off of, in flights of supposedly spiritual speculation and dreaming. N went mad, in no small way, from his overly extreme view of life as pure here and now action and therefore , he could see that the way his life was going he certainly was not the strong hero of the ancient sagas. He resorted to calling himself the crucified one and casting his dream of Ubermensch to his future disciples. So very like the Christian hoping for a better life in the future. Just thought I would rant for a moment. Be well my friend.
@sonofcronos7831
@sonofcronos7831 2 жыл бұрын
@@thenowchurch6419 i dont agree with nothing with him, i disagree with Nietzsche view on pity, views on morality, views on christianity and etc. I just wanna to make the case that Nietzsche is not complety against the ideia of religion, so i made a simplification of that idea.
@ZYX84
@ZYX84 2 жыл бұрын
I can only think of this, “physician heal by self” I wonder if he ever did?
@pinkyteel525
@pinkyteel525 2 жыл бұрын
Great discussion!
@moshefabrikant1
@moshefabrikant1 2 жыл бұрын
18:00 Understand biology and write your books around it. What it gives you
@tycobrahe7663
@tycobrahe7663 Жыл бұрын
Superb analysis, not just of Nietzsche but of other philosophers mentioned in comparison. Kant, with his “blind obedience to Categorical Imperatives” gave us the Nazi Germany. Nietzsche’s allegorical approach is very well explained in this lecture. Well done!
@lw9811
@lw9811 Жыл бұрын
Lol
@DrAlexVasquezICHNFM
@DrAlexVasquezICHNFM 10 ай бұрын
Truly excellent review 🎉
@unbearablyyours
@unbearablyyours 2 жыл бұрын
Could you pleaseeeee do a similar detailed analysis of Dostoevsky's Brothers Karamazov? I know it' s a lengthy book but isn't there a way?
@jimc.goodfellas
@jimc.goodfellas 2 жыл бұрын
That would be awesome. Hell i'd love to see someone just do a deep dive on "The Grand Inquisitor"
@sergioandresvahos281
@sergioandresvahos281 2 жыл бұрын
Pay for it! Pay for your request!
@jeanbaptiste8628
@jeanbaptiste8628 Жыл бұрын
The Two-Face, placed in order through 2-3-1, as the gap between 3 and 1, as 2-1, the opposition to 1-2, the latter Dr. Fian, the former Ali the Prophet, the King James of Scotland; Daemonologie.
@roberttheiss6377
@roberttheiss6377 2 жыл бұрын
I smell some good content.
@ahmed2741
@ahmed2741 2 жыл бұрын
I was happy, i thought it is a new video on Nietzsche 😐
@WeltgeistYT
@WeltgeistYT 2 жыл бұрын
New one on Wednesday
@haisolungdisuang2069
@haisolungdisuang2069 2 жыл бұрын
@@WeltgeistYT already waiting
@joahchewbhaka5679
@joahchewbhaka5679 2 жыл бұрын
14:40 the smell also seems to be something linked to speculation, intuition.
@bioliv1
@bioliv1 2 жыл бұрын
Ah, this is such an intelligent canal, and good pronouncing. Thanks!
@filosophik
@filosophik 10 ай бұрын
Ecce Homo is very cognizant of Zarathustra as such you must make a video detailing and identifying the strange and prevalent similarities between it and the biblical book Ecclesiastes. In tone style and pessimistic inclination towards joy!
@markus4925
@markus4925 2 жыл бұрын
Great channel
@gikal8118
@gikal8118 2 жыл бұрын
Thank You.
@psychologie2go633
@psychologie2go633 Жыл бұрын
It’s pronounced [ˈɛkːɛ], not [eche]. It’s classic Latin, not Italien
@TheAyatollahofNofappollah
@TheAyatollahofNofappollah Жыл бұрын
Thanks 😊
@itsalwayshotinarizona
@itsalwayshotinarizona 2 жыл бұрын
holy fuck! Thank you!!!!!
@Yurick052
@Yurick052 Ай бұрын
Behold the man, name thar tune.
@JohnCena-iq3tg
@JohnCena-iq3tg 2 жыл бұрын
So I might have misunderstood the context on which you are using this but just so we are all clear Nietzsche didn't write the will to power that was his sister
@ZYX84
@ZYX84 2 жыл бұрын
If it doesn’t make it past your nose, you should probably not put it in your mouth! At least that’s what my grandfather taught me when I was a child. Be careful what you choose to digest.
@EyalAvrahamov
@EyalAvrahamov 2 жыл бұрын
thanjs bro
@stefdiazdiaz7067
@stefdiazdiaz7067 Жыл бұрын
He got weak and sick from overeating sweet fruit.
@loocstioyj18
@loocstioyj18 2 жыл бұрын
Can you do a critique on nietzches work?
@stefdiazdiaz7067
@stefdiazdiaz7067 Жыл бұрын
I have eaten rotten meat several times with no apparent ill effects, and yes it stinks horribly.
@dr....3229
@dr....3229 Ай бұрын
Wow
@magicsinglez
@magicsinglez Жыл бұрын
Nietzsche’s point is to embarrass himself
@PianohooliganPiotrOrzechowski
@PianohooliganPiotrOrzechowski Жыл бұрын
books are for reading
@tangerinesarebetterthanora7060
@tangerinesarebetterthanora7060 Жыл бұрын
very controversial take, but I respect your earnestness.
@PianohooliganPiotrOrzechowski
@PianohooliganPiotrOrzechowski Жыл бұрын
@@tangerinesarebetterthanora7060 yes, it's an incredibly controversial take
@Endymion766
@Endymion766 2 жыл бұрын
what coffee was he drinking to make him gloomy? Maybe its that Jacobs Kronung. Just the name sounds gloomy.
@Killerbee_McTitties
@Killerbee_McTitties 2 жыл бұрын
Sounds like Stirner put into different terms tbh.
@louisuniverse
@louisuniverse 2 жыл бұрын
the irony of nietzsche is that while he could smell the rotten corpse at the center of christianity - he could not understand that that is EXACTLY why christianity is the true materialist ideology. Dyonisian thought is exactly what he was trying to escape! (the false world of immaterial ideas) this is why he went mad - dyonisus hides the corpse and nietzshe said YES! this smells good! (blinding himself into thinking he was a real materialist : christianity reveals the corpse! And thus SMELLS BAD but IS THE TRUTH of our material world
@veerswami7175
@veerswami7175 2 жыл бұрын
Wrong there is enought counter for that analogy in his book ( may be zarasthura ones )
@louisuniverse
@louisuniverse 2 жыл бұрын
@@veerswami7175 meh -not convincing since nietzsche himself knew that only christianity was an original form of religion - all else is just paganism and paganism is death
@AlexWitoslawski
@AlexWitoslawski Жыл бұрын
I'm fairly certain the pronunciation of this book title should be "ekke omo" not "eche homo" - it's in Latin, not Italian.
@antunatomasan
@antunatomasan Жыл бұрын
it's ecclesiastical (medieval) Latin. What you're mentioning would be the reconstructed classical pronunciation.
@antunatomasan
@antunatomasan Жыл бұрын
lmao the virgin jesus vs the chad dionysius
@thenowchurch6419
@thenowchurch6419 2 жыл бұрын
Of course the philosophers had biases and were not being perfectly objective. They do not claim to be God or flawless, so that is okay. Nietzsche is claiming to be the authority on life and philosophy, the new Christ.
@sergioandresvahos281
@sergioandresvahos281 2 жыл бұрын
Excelente contenido el de este canal. Suscrito inmediatamente.
@JS-dt1tn
@JS-dt1tn Жыл бұрын
Its really anti-christian, evoking the anti-jew sentiment of the day in ironic fashion. Not Anti-christ in the biblical sense.
@OjiiBwompzz
@OjiiBwompzz 2 жыл бұрын
weed 💕
@fancycanuck
@fancycanuck 6 ай бұрын
🫡
@kattam312
@kattam312 2 жыл бұрын
What’s your opinion of Marx ? Have read any of his works ?
@silent_stalker3687
@silent_stalker3687 2 жыл бұрын
Marx was way too far up his own ass and way too much into Hegel where he went with ‘everything has to contradict’ and copied his style. I prefer Engles for many reasons. Marx bragging about Engles wife being dead making him emotional- saying “this proves I’m the intellectual” to where he then was so distraught over his wife having a miscarriage that Engles had to push Marx to say how his wife was doing. Engles also was very wholesome and made pudding on holidays. And the big difference is this. Engles took the blame for Marx banging a maid took the boy, Marx died never telling his own son the truth and saying “leave me alone I’ve said enough.” Engles took one to say his political career. After this Engles found out while he was paying and helping Marx write Das Kapital for decades- Marx spend years not even touching the book, and Engles left a note to his sons saying who his true father was. He may have been smart- if not spoiled. But as Arthur would say: “he head himself stupid.”
@kattam312
@kattam312 2 жыл бұрын
@@silent_stalker3687 Thanks. I did not know that about his character. I will look into engles work.
@WeltgeistYT
@WeltgeistYT 2 жыл бұрын
A long time ago. Too long ago to have a good opinion
@silent_stalker3687
@silent_stalker3687 2 жыл бұрын
@@kattam312 engles and Marx co-op wrote books but the Marx fans have basically thrown him under the bus I suggest Thomas Sowell’s book ‘marxism’ for a bit on the matter of how it’s treated and I think the quicker summary is in the ‘Sowell reader’ book, it has quick summary on Marx’s life. Tik also covers Marx to a degree- and terms ‘commodity money’ is what Marx called capitalist money, and promoted Fiat money. Also the most notable is how quotes are trimmed and cut to make things sound more ‘easier to sell’ I would suggest reading Kaufman’s translation of Nietzsche’s genealogy of morality and his quote on socialism, nationalism and ‘science’ which is really ‘it went through this process and by going through it means it’s true’ process meaning- anything religion, faction checked and so on. As for communism- the ones of the 30-40’s were honest. They saw their side supporting the national socialists in Germany and then turned on them as if nothing happened. You know the ‘Disney German propaganda’? Look at the studio that produced that- a Unionized studio ran by communists using Disney’s property and he couldn’t do anything because of the shitty laws. Communists outside of the communist party- they criticized their party for that. Look at the bernie bros, Democrats and so on- can’t question without being attacked, and just last year Biden and Kamala were the face of the anti-vax and now look at them. Communists in the 30’s and 40’s were more honest, open to debate and questioning their ideas than they are now. Look up the video ‘Thomas Sowell a tale of two blackouts’ I wonder what changed…
@MrBurns.
@MrBurns. 2 жыл бұрын
You would get more people to pay for your videos if it was less than $10 a month. I think that price acts as a deterrent considering the lack of content compared to streaming services like curiosity stream that only ask a fraction of what you do.
@GamerOner2H
@GamerOner2H 2 жыл бұрын
Yet you are here.
@Sunfried1
@Sunfried1 Жыл бұрын
I enjoy your videos but I wish you would use the English pronunciation of words like decadence. The French pronunciation sounds pompous.
@WeltgeistYT
@WeltgeistYT Жыл бұрын
Nietzsche insists on using the French himself
@mortezshafa2215
@mortezshafa2215 2 жыл бұрын
PLEASE SPEAK UP.
@honeysucklecat
@honeysucklecat 2 жыл бұрын
You really need to tone down the begging for subscribers. Also, more cats. I saw no cats. Why?
@charlesjohnson8106
@charlesjohnson8106 2 жыл бұрын
Catullus (c. 84 - c. 54 BC) Poem 13 Line Latin text English translation 1 Cenabis bene, mi Fabulle, apud me You will dine well, my Fabullus, at my house 2 paucis, si tibi di favent, diebus in a few days, if the gods favor you, 3 si tecum attuleris bonam atque magnam if with you you bring a good and great 4 cenam, non sine candida puella meal, not without a fair-skinned girl 5 et vino et sale et omnibus cachinnis both wine and wit and all the banter. 6 Haec si, inquam, attuleris, venuste noster, If you bring these, I say, our charming friend, 7 cenabis bene; nam tui Catulli you will dine well, for the wallet of your Catullus 8 plenus sacculus est aranearum. is full of cobwebs. 9 Sed contra accipies meros amores But in exchange you will receive the most pure friendship 10 seu quid suavius elegantiusve est: or whatever is more sweet or more elegant: 11 nam unguentum dabo, quod meae puellae or I will give perfume, which to my girl 12 donarunt Veneres Cupidinesque, Venuses and Cupids have given, 13 quod tu cum olfacies, deos rogabis, which when you will smell it, you will ask the gods, 14 totum ut te faciant, Fabulle, nasum. to make you, Fabullus, all nose.
NIETZSCHE Explained: The Antichrist (Full Analysis)
31:58
Weltgeist
Рет қаралды 86 М.
Nietzsche’s Weakness
17:32
Weltgeist
Рет қаралды 27 М.
Angry Sigma Dog 🤣🤣 Aayush #momson #memes #funny #comedy
00:16
ASquare Crew
Рет қаралды 51 МЛН
Самое неинтересное видео
00:32
Miracle
Рет қаралды 2,7 МЛН
Men Vs Women Survive The Wilderness For $500,000
31:48
MrBeast
Рет қаралды 103 МЛН
So Cute 🥰
00:17
dednahype
Рет қаралды 62 МЛН
Nietzsche's Deepest Idea Will Change Your Life
30:40
SEEKER TO SEEKER
Рет қаралды 60 М.
NIETZSCHE Explained: Beyond Good and Evil (ALL PARTS)
42:27
Weltgeist
Рет қаралды 364 М.
Why Nietzsche Loved Thucydides
28:03
Weltgeist
Рет қаралды 90 М.
Nietzsche: Ecce Homo (3/7): Why I Am So Clever
1:02:22
Inspiration 365
Рет қаралды 2,7 М.
Nietzsche’s Genius Philosophy - Thus Spoke Zarathustra
38:14
Fiction Beast
Рет қаралды 203 М.
What Happened to Nietzsche? - Madness and the Divine Mania
16:30
Academy of Ideas
Рет қаралды 252 М.
Why Nietzsche Hated Kant
28:50
Weltgeist
Рет қаралды 299 М.
Nietzsche's Warning: The Decline of Humanity
28:43
The Machiavellians
Рет қаралды 92 М.
Episode #090     Nietzsche pt  1
28:17
Philosophize This!
Рет қаралды 172 М.
Nietzsche: Only Losers Complain
16:34
Weltgeist
Рет қаралды 32 М.
Angry Sigma Dog 🤣🤣 Aayush #momson #memes #funny #comedy
00:16
ASquare Crew
Рет қаралды 51 МЛН