12:17 13:42 16:36 22:51 25:11 25:12

I mean Socrates fought in a war off a men's orders because they could order him to murder innocents. No wonder Socrates needs justification

This entire argument can be completely reversed. Niche is asking, “Why ask why?”. And I can respond, “Because I can”. I can use the Athenian justification to ponder Socratically.

Well in ancient India they had the caste system which originally had the warrior at the top only to be usurped by the priests

God told Nietzsche to read Schopenhauer 😂

What is the track in the background?

The ultimate question that no philosopher, scientist, prophet or whoever that hitherto analyzed life and nature to conclude what is RIGHT, has answered is: What is the food that guarantees immortality? The person who answers this question correctly would remain alive to explain it to everybody else and han (she/he) requires no other proof for its accuracy than that han is here forever. More importantly, if this is possible, then you cannot expect a clue to it from any DEAD PERSON's work (scientist, philosopher, prophet or whoever), as the "Übermensch" who had the slightest clue to it would have followed it to the hilt and remained here to explain it to all others. If it is possible to derive the mathematical model of the mechanism how particle interactions inside the earth develop PLANTS on its own surface to then deliver and sustain beings here through them (a process that happens billions of times every single day just now), then it is possible to practically trace and rearrange the sources of all evil (DISASTERS, PREDATION, DISEASES ~ which include all birth defects, all weapons manufacture, all violence ~ and DEATH) while those sources are still inside the earth, so that they never reach the surface to harm any being. Possession of that model would also enable us to prevent death, retrace and resurrect all beings that ever lived here (excluding, of course, the parasites like mosquitoes), terraform other celestial bodies from here itself using the plants to access the resources inside the earth, without mining them and building factories to process on the surface ~ as we do at present, and transfer them to those celestial bodies automatically using animals eating from suitably designed plants as the only necessary LABOUR. Thereafter we can manufacture the vessels to travel to those celestial destinations with all necessary fuel inbuilt (earthlets, in fact), the same way, inside the earth itself too, before proceeding to populate more and more celestial bodies eternally. This would render Nietzschean "eternal recurrence and saying yes to life with all the evil" superfluous as owning, designing and populating new celestial entities (moons, planets and stars) would bring eternally new experiences for all beings (humans AND animals) to enjoy cooperatively ~ eternal evil free life function is a practically realizable task for the present generation, if we only derive that mathematical model.

The weakest people argue the least 😂😂

I was indifferent to having children. Many things happened to change my indifference. I was taught for one to live another must die. I was also taught by the Catholic church that not having kids is selfish by a celibate priest. Ive seen many people justify reprehensible behavior because they have children. Children are becoming more expensive these days, and people barely have the money to take care of themselves let alone a child. Many people say put children first then they become spoiled selfish and rude because parents dont have a healthy balance between the needs of the parents and the needs of their children. Then there is the abuse and trauma. I would hate for any offspring i might have to go through the pain and suffering i went through

I mainly argue nowadays in a strategic way. I try to convince people to vote for Trump because I want Trump to win. I also defend Judaism, because I am a Jew, and I don't like it when people hate me. But yes, granted, I argue with my friends because I am chasing a victory over them. Also because it's fun.

Nietzche statments just proves how much, psychologicaly speaking, sexual abuse misconducts human reasoning. Nietzche is right that morals , that of Kant morals, and that of Christians morals are essentialy the same, but because morals ( righoutsness to act) are global and only Just then its global, you cannot reinvent morals, cuz Good is always gonna be Good and Bad is Always gonna be Bad. Tragism of Nietzche, that he lacked wisdom to understand that morals are not free creative dimension of reality, but rather global justice equally applied to all subjects. Regarding philosophy, Kant simply said that time and space ( intuition) not restricting concioussness, but rather creating a framework for experience, cause otherwise chaos will be in place of intuition by default and willpower will be not possible and everything after that. Kant Philosophy actually is True Zarathustrism, where Fire in Mind, without yet impactful pressence of Spirit, contemplates infinity, but without any psichology, sociality or morality, just pure Human Reasoning of Infinity,( contemplation of Nature of Fire) which Christianity has never been itself as such, as Pure Reason ( Pure Fire , cause Pure Reason is deduction from Pure Fire )

This is kind of a silly premise isn't it? We devalue our reasons because we think about them doesn't seem like a weird though. The lion kills the gazelle by nature the lion also kills his children by nature so yeah

All my life I have always thought that is Immanuel Kant.

Arguing, not debating of course.

Neon genesis evangelion anyone?

Nietsche was an idiot. His belief in the morality of plundering see riders (aka homeric heroes) was ridiculous at best.

Idealism and metaphysics are utter nonsense. Psychotic delusions. I'm sorry i have to disagree with this mastodont of thought, but he f'ed up big here.

“Don’t argue, command!” I command you to stfu while I argue my case, good sir

Nietzsche, the original Incel. Wonder how much influence his failures in personal life and rejections had on his philosophy

So if i do something good because it feels like a good thing is ok and natural, but if that's the same thing that christianity asks me to do than it's bad and unnatural? 😮😮😮

He is a great author

Arguing and Debate are not the same thing. We don't even know what debating is and it's pathetic as hell. Most people deez days prob think its something you do with masterbation haha

He is missunderstood, was not literaly. He is refering, reacting to Kant in half of his philisophy, that is not hate, if he tought he have no value will not mention, but that was his style. He was wondering how Schopenhour hates Hegel, called, wired, crazzy, unexplainable. Againts philosophy itself, that can't be allowed, we can't give arguments of enemies of philosophy...In that he discovers himself like a methaphorical writer, never hated any good philosopher. But tryed to explain in his crazzy style.

I agree with all of this.

Nietzche sounds a bit Nazi-ish

Only fools believe and consider as sacred the supernatural fairy tales, fictions, and myths just because a book claims itself to be the holy truth.

the thumbnail pic used to cover my wall in HS....

N's knowledge of the brain is limited. But brain science at that time was in its infancy.

I am living proof that there is desire in some humans to seek the truth and gain nothing by doing so, only to uncover it.

We already know where such a mindset would lead us: expulsion, slavery and genocide. Just think about the Nazis. They had this self-image of the superman who was allowed to subjugate, enslave and exterminate because he was the “best”. And it was more cruel than ever before, as it was combined with the most modern technology (gas chambers, etc.). Another way must be and IS possible!

Was that an argument?

Impossible Nietzchie can't be WRONG He is a genius💀💀

Can we talk about Quantum Physics instead?😂

Nietzche is a prophet that attacks everyone 😂😂😂😂😂

It really is a stupid question though… Like what a dbag obviously the reasoning of a lack of energy limiting the functionality of the animal would justify it laying down. This is oddly petty. Did they not like each other?

the next few lines of the beginning of the book whill give you a good insight why i call Nietzsche a nazist

🔥

You often wonder who was never discovered

The Natural Hypertrophy Chanel calls Government: A Coalition of Betas.

If weak refers to the absence of power being accumulated by one person, then let us all strive for weakness.

Please, will you make videos about Pierre Bourdieu, he describes that taste, preference, is determined by your social class. Or what does taste, preference, say about your character or intelligence?

...More people should read this before considering putting their children through school (I wish my parents had).

War is only Life or Economic life in Full speed. ( War changes the Age in small amounts of years. 100 years in War is 1 years and in a revolution 6 months.)

Trash. Worst video on KZbin. Unadulterated misguidance of the highest(lowest) order

Nietzsche adopts, in effect grows to prefer the arguments of all the people who were destroying him. He rejects his own reason and philosophy, and when they put him in the madhouse, dreaming of love and physical affection, denied him, he has already adopted the position of the enemy who destroys him, it gains him nothing to do this, his pain ultimately still brought him misery. All i see here is neitzsche is wrong, this merely tells me the EXCESSES OF THE STRONG must be CONTROLLED, CHAINED AND RESTRAINED, like the US CONSTITUTION did. It's like arguing a murderer is the real hero because they're strong, then when murdered, one cries out in pain, should the idiot not celebrate🎉❤😢😅😮........

I see. Nietzsche says we should rule based on vibes. Groovy.

Who wants to argue with someone who has that shoe brush moustache?

at 18:32 "is it not the same with humans?" I argue that it is not the same and that the examples of lions hunting is not a good one because animals are hungry, that is the reason. We are given some powers of discretion with our instincts. Of course the weak would want to find a way to bring the master down or become master themselves. Is that "wrong" or just human nature? Are the "weak" supposed to just stay that way? Interesting this Master Morality. It makes sense but it sounds like a bunch of BS that was invented by the ruling class to stay that way which also I believe is human nature. It is very interesting the idea that arguing is for the weak. This Ubermensch thing sounds a bit like a dictator, maybe a benevolent one but I really don't think people are built that way. I agree that there are a lot of laws in our civilization maybe too many. I doubt it will ever come to one "second coming" type of event. Humans will either evolve into something else that can survive or rise above our basest natures, or will die out.

The irony in all this is that in order to convince his readers, Neitzsche must engage in arguments