Nikon 300mm f/4 AF ED Lens Review / sample images / The perfect budget 300mm that delivers results

[@kennyj604]

This is the 4th or 5th time I watched this. This has to be the best lens review on all of KZbin. It was exactly what I was looking for in a lens review regarding a lens I'm interested in. Not some person inside a house or office talking talking talking loving to hear themselves spout a whole diatribe of specs etc etc without ever going outside and presenting actual photo samples. On first watch of this video I had no idea who you were and didn't know that you are such an accomplished professional. Some but not all professionals kinda speak in a condescending tone and it's off-putting when one is an amateur and just loves photography because it's fun, fun to learn, and it's an artistic form of self expression. Sorry how long this comment is but I thought I'd share my feelings. The lens turned out to be in bad shape. Oh well. I did buy an old 70-210 f/4. It's from the 80's and what a gem. Love it.

[@Vahagraphy]

Ken, thank you so much. This comment made my day. Happy you enjoyed this review and helped you out. I love this lens so much. Size and quality of glass. I will never sell it. It has that old gem character. Thank you for such High praise. I am flattered and humbled. You can tell I dont do well with compliments, lol i just sometimes dont know what to say. but I am humbled by your comments. Makes me go out there and try harder on my next video. Guys like you Ken that I do this for. Yes it does take time from like a business but at the end of the day if I can make a difference in one person's photography journey than the goal is met. Rock n Roll and thank you

[@lifeisabruhmoment6167]

@@Vahagraphy would the version of the lens you have auto focus with any z cameras?

[@venturasurfing]

The trees with the yellow leaves are Ginko Biloba. Very unique tree and popular in Japanese gardens. Fantastic review of the 300mm. You actually saved me from buying the AF-S version which I do not think I would be as happy with. Thank you!

[@Nikonover]

Just purchased one of these beauties, ultra sharp, thanks for the video and inspiration. I was toying with the idea of buying the PF model, but with the price I paid for this older model couldn't be more happier. $500 Australian. Thanks.

[@Vahagraphy]

Glad I could help! The older 300 f4 AF is a great lens and for the price. Built like a tank and awesome. The image quality it produces is mind blowing. THe contrast this beauty delivers is something special. Enjoy your 300 f4 :)

[@slr7075]

The greatest review of this lens on YT. The color saturation, microcontrast, 3D pop, sharpness, bokeh and low price is all unbelievable! The only issues with this lens is some CA on bright contrasting edges and the extremely hard to find and expensive Nikon 39mm drop-in filter but otherwise this lens is near perfection.

[@Vahagraphy]

Well thank you SLR. Appreciate the positive motivating comment here. The AF focus might be a twity turny mess but the image that this lens renders is beautiful. thank you for watching.

[@williamfarnsworth3898]

I went online and bought one of these after watching your video and seeing your results. Let's just say... I haven't used my zoom lens once since getting this lens.

[@Vahagraphy]

Congrats on the 300 f4 AF William. Use it and enjoy it. How do you like it so far?

[@GLOBETROTTER.Co.]

The AF-D 300mm f/4 ED is a wonderful lens and built rock-solid. The 300mm 2.8 ED is a fraction sharper wide open, but I prefer to carry this F4 version in the bag, along with the AF-D 20-35mm f/2.8 and the legendary AF-D 200mm f/4 ED Micro. All these lenses are built like tanks and have a superb 'feel' to them...together with outstanding performance matched to the old F5 or D5, D800, D850 etc. With more than five decades of serious photography and filming under my belt, I still love to use these lenses in 2020...and no doubt during 2021! :)

[@Vahagraphy]

Big Size difference between a 2.8 and this lens. Can you imagine lugging the 2.8 around in your bag. Heavy while on transport and while using it too. This 300 D is compact and built very solid. Feels good in the had. I wished it was AF-S with this body style. Imagine AF-s but older body style. haha one can wish

[@ArneList]

@@Vahagraphy it is, what it is. I also collect the lenses from this era, and they will never fail, while the servo motors of the AF-S lenses will. It is like going back to the F4, but using a digital body. Best of both worlds.

[@PrinceMeowmers]

Just ordered mine! Paid $270+ shipping/tax. I'm the photographer for my baseball team, and wanted to get a bit closer to the action on the field than what my 80-200 could get me. I was a little concerned over what other internet people said about the AF, but your great photos of the biker put me at ease. Thanks for the great review.

[@Vahagraphy]

You will be just fine. Sure AF-S more expensive offerings have advantages as far as focus speed, but for the price we paid and the reach with it not being f5.6 or below. cant complain. Ofcourse I would rather use a 300 f2.8 AFS VR but that lens cost a few thousand dollars and if your not getting paid good money on the regular then it doesnt make sense to invest in such a lens unless your financial situation permits you. Personally if money was no object I would be buying the 400mm 2.8 vr. haha that lens is massive for baseball. MLB shooters industry standard, but we talking about yankee stadium and rigley field, hehe you did good Brennan. congrats. Enjoy the lens and let me know what you think after you shoot a few games.

[@primate2744]

How did the lens end up working for you?

[@PrinceMeowmers]

@@primate2744 Overall I'd say it's good, not great. The AF is noticeably slower and less accurate than my 70-200mm f/2.8 AFS VR I. When you nail focus it's very sharp, but that might not happen so often as it does have trouble keeping up with moving subjects. For reference I use a Nikon D780. For what I do it's definitely good enough (photos for my baseball team newsletter and some paid high school sports gigs), but if you're shooting professionally I'd probably go for something a little newer.

[@primate2744]

@@PrinceMeowmers mostly I shoot nature stuff. Not professionally. I currently use a d500 with a sigma 150-600. I was looking for a fast prime but this most likely won't be it from what I've seen. I greatly appreciate your reply.

[@413TomaccoRoad]

I have shot at many concerts in the first 5 or 6 rows and the 180mm f/2.8 was the longest lens I ever really needed to use.

[@Vahagraphy]

Great lens. I need to go to a concert soon, lol

[@Junior6502001]

Wow! The images were absolutely gorgeous! I have an 80-200mm but after this video will put the 300mm on my shopping list. Got a new subscriber. Thanks for sharing!

[@Vahagraphy]

Hello there. welcome to Vahagraphy RaiQ. Happy to have you. Ohh yes the good ol 300 AF. you can knock someone out with this lens, its built so tough. I was blown away with the results.

[@AntPDC]

Spectacular photography, with an equally spectacular lens. Great review, thank you.

[@Vahagraphy]

Thank you AntPDC. Appreciate your words. Glad you enjoyed it. ROCK ON!!

[@ArneList]

You are producing exactly the reviews, people like me really need. Yes, we are passionate photographers, yes we collect our Nikon stuff, but we look for good old used lenses and cameras, because we are not rich and live in the real world.

[@Vahagraphy]

Thank you very much. This means allot to me Arne. Glad you enjoyed the review. Hopefully someone at Nikon Marketing wakes up with NDA stuff. Not holding my breathe. Ohh well. lol

[@bajangbiru]

Back in 90's my uncle used to have one of these. Having this lens attached to F90X body, just by looking at it, the combo screams adventure :)

[@rolando_gelatinosa]

Great video. Thanks for the detail & encouragement. I just ordered one! Your beautiful shots are very rewarding to own such a lens.

[@Vahagraphy]

Thanks bro, Glad I could help. Keep in mind its an old lens so the AF will not be like modern AF-S lenses. COngrats on the purchase.

[@robertj4488]

Great video! I just ordered and received one of these lenses yesterday, and then stumbled across this video. I'm new to photography so this video really helped me see what this lens is capable of. Thank you!

[@Vahagraphy]

Glad it was helpful! and what do you think of this lens so far?

[@charlesdjones1]

That photo of the DC-10 floored me! That was all I needed to convince to get this. I'm trying to get all the lenses I need to start up a small side business with a D750, which I love btw, and absolutely cannot justify $2500 on a 300mm lens that I might use, like you said, a few times a month.

[@Vahagraphy]

Exactly. If you're using these lenses 1 or 2 times a month, is it worth the 3K investment. Well for some it is. for some, they are happy with these older D and AF lenses. YEs its screw drive, yes its loud and not as fast but who cares. lol hehe

[@ARGAMAWOO]

Great video and review of this 80s gem! I got the same lens through a camera combo deal on OfferUp for $350 just few months ago. It was a Nikon F4s SLR with 50mm f1.8 af-d and this 300mm f4 af-d along with some original accessories and books. Everything works fine and I am very happy about it.

[@Vahagraphy]

Wow you got a smoking deal. Are you using the film camera at all? btw Thank you, Im glad you enjoyed this video review. Rock n Roll!!!

[@efreutel]

Love the mil-spec crinkle finish. What a beauty! ❤❤❤Great review, many thanks!

[@Vahagraphy]

Glad you enjoyed the video.

[@BrianJohnson-bq9tr]

I am looking for a budget 300mm f4 prime and this was the front runner...and it still is after this video. I am looking forward to mount ting this on my D7000. Just subscribed. Great video!

[@Vahagraphy]

Thank you Brian. Glad you enjoyed the review.. Yes you will love the 300 F4 AF. D7000 has focus motors so AF will work for sure.

[@Nikonover]

Had this lens for 4 years coupled to D7200, brilliant lens, super sharp. Cost me $450 Australian. Great video, you made me want to get it out again, they are super solid.

[@johnthomas6156]

Just ordered this lens today. Looking forward to getting it. Thanks for sharing.

[@Vahagraphy]

Congrats on the lens. Take killer pictures and let me know what your first impression are. Have fun John.

[@johnthomas6156]

Love the lens. Got some great shots with it today at the lake.

[@Vahagraphy]

@@johnthomas6156 Congrats John. Have fun with it and enjoy it.

[@johnthomas6156]

@@Vahagraphy I got it and love it. Thanks!

[@Mark-ro6go]

Very nice results! This is definitely on my list of lenses to own, your video helped!

[@Vahagraphy]

Thank you Mark. Glad I can help. If your used to the AF-S versions and how they AF, this one is a D lens with the rotating focus motors. hehe.

[@fjphoto23]

Inspiring to a hobbyists like me on buying used old lenses.

[@Vahagraphy]

Love them , I have my eye on a few others, There is or was a local meet up. where sellers would get together 1 time a month, before covid, it was called the bargain camera show in LA and OC, california area. You would find some old gems there at good prices. Miss thiose days going to the Bargain camera show. just google it and you will see the dates when they start doing it again. Bring back that show. Love mingling with local phortographers too at this event. if your from the So cal area. worth checking out in the future.

[@steveottavaino3804]

The helicopter shot alone justified the purchase!!! Nice work brother, fun and educational vid as always. Ciao.

[@Vahagraphy]

Thank you Steve. I was watching a 9/11 docu series on Netflix yesterday about Sept 11. Now that you say helicopter. It reminded me and when watching the film , The sheer madness and scope of the tragedy. I noticed how people in the midst of things still had to document the day. Very important pictures taken that day. I would of done the same. Lenses like these , small, and easy to move around with and shoot would be ideal fora breaking news type of events.

[@Slrpics]

Just ordered one from Adorama for $309 V Rated for Very Good Condition. I saw one on Ebay for $270 that looked good but cant go wrong with Adorama and their return policy(which I doubt I'll be using). They have given me some mint lenses in the past that were rated V so thank you for your review on this lens and will update when it arrives. I got it mostly for portraits and weddings when I need that reach. Excited and not too far off what you paid!

[@Vahagraphy]

Hi Shane, Good price. Congrats on your purchase. Hope it works out for you. You will enjoy the extra reach. The only draw back is the focus speed and focus noise but hey for $300 haha thats a non issue. The size and weight is another plus. It has this solid image quality I love. Yes it has no VR and hand holding it can get some getting used to, but with high shutter speed you will be fine. Have fun with it and let me know what you think.

[@oldfilmguy9413]

Great review of a great lens. I notice some comments concerning chromatic aberration/fringing, but I have not seen that yet. I took a photo of the moon the other night just to see how it compared to another lens I have and was amazed there was absolutely no fringing on the bright edges of the moon in the raw image - no corrections applied. You comments were spot on about who should buy this lens - most folks will use 300mm sparingly, and you cannot beat this deal. Cheers!

[@alessio71r18]

I own this lens. And I love it. I think that every amateur schould own it. not easy to use, not easy to carry. But it always in my bag

[@Vahagraphy]

I agree. and it doesn't cost much. A no brainer, Built like a tank and will last a lifetime.

[@mistergiovanni7183]

Woooow!! Very good photos of the planes. Impressive performance for such an inexpensive lens. The D4 sensor, a legend.

[@RodneyTBarnes]

I ordered one tonight after watching your video many times in the past week or so. I am just hoping since no VR I can get sharp pictures too.

[@Vahagraphy]

Congrats and enjoy the lens. Keep your SS up and you should be fine. You will love the image this lens renders. a 300 for around 300 , where do I sign hehe.

[@madnesstothemethod3328]

Thank you for your thoughtful review. I have had this lens for a few years, along with the f2.8 AI-s and I'm in about $1000 for both (together). I would rate the 2.8 as superior optically, but not by much. The f4 AF is softer wide open than the f2.8 and there is some slight green/purple fringing on the edges of the frame. at f8 and down, it goes away and their performance is so almost identical.

[@Vahagraphy]

Glad you enjoyed the review Madness. Both great lenses and to be expected with the 2.8. This is why one pays for a 2.8. faster glass and more expensive. but per your observations and usage, the f4 is an amazing lens for what it is and for how much you can pay for it today, its a no brainer. and on top of all that it will AF with pro cameras that have those focus motors and it does a very good job at it aswell. As a bonus, its built like and tank and is not that big. Its a win win on all fronts.

[@agnethaladuff8559]

That is a good lens for a low price. I like the pictures you took with it. I will definitely try out the lens in the near future.

[@Vahagraphy]

Good 300 for the budget, yes AF isn't fast or ground breaking or even silent but hey, get me killer shots. for the money. all day every day

[@gef3565]

Handsome video ! I would like to share my experience: I purchased this lens 12 years used to mount on my d300. I did great safari pictures in India and Tanzania. Then I switched to Olympus for weight purpose and my d300 broke down. So my lens stayed at home for 6 years. Last week, a friend of mine got the d850 and we compared it with this lens on versus my Olympus with pro lenses Guess what ? I just purchased a used d800 just to use this lens again ! And on full frame it is even better. Thanks again !

[@jimwlouavl]

Great sharpness and colors. I love the colors rendered by the older Nikon lenses.

[@Vahagraphy]

Isn't it something special. The contrast and solid image quality it produces. Yes its slow focus thins and that but who cares. hehe I care about the images at the end of the day.

[@garrywatters1140]

I have one that I use on my D800E and love the pics it takes.

[@Vahagraphy]

I actually prefer the output of this lens to the AF-S version of the F4. I've owned both and I really like this one. Ofcourse AF-S has faster focus but... Now the F2.8 is on another level. haha so is the price. lol

[@endoplasreh]

Great review. I picked up this lens and it had some road wear on it, but, optically it is amazing. Amazing how sharp it is. I use it on my D500 with a cropped effective focal length of 450mm due to the 1.5 crop factor. The lens is slow to focus compared to today's focusing motors, but optically, those newer lenses do not come near the sharpness and color rendition of this lens. Great glass from a time gone by. All metal construction and balances well on the D500. I would drive nails with the lens but one might be able to with how well it is constructed. Thanks for the great review.

[@Vahagraphy]

Thank you Phil. Glad you enjoyed the review. This lens is magic. It renders an image and contrast unlike no other. Also the size factor. the thing is not to big and not to heavy, Built like a tank. Your on point with this lens. Keep it cuz its a keeper.

[@bijujacobjohn]

Great field review. Just bought it used for INR 22,000 at Bangalore.

[@kapilgautam7244]

Awesome , have you shot any wildlife with it??

[@unusualdesigns]

Awesome lens. Awesome video too. I bought it from a senior photographer for around 300$. I am from India by the way.

[@Vahagraphy]

Nice. Good Lens good price. 300 AF rocks .

[@GrainOnTheGo]

this one is amazing for one reason only, and it's because I use it on nikon film bodies, and then can switch it to my DSLR nikon bodies. Absolutely amazing.

[@user-lh4nl5zh8w]

I just bought one and it is beautiful 300mm lens

[@Vahagraphy]

It really is. Enjoy.

[@finephotographyart]

Thank you for this interesting description of the 300 mm. I use it since nearly 20 years and I like it. You give me many motivation to use it more. Very impressive are the fotos of the aeroplanes. Best regards Hans

[@billb8262]

The rendering looks amazing, almost 3D like in quality where many other lenses look relatively flat in a 2-D printed or on-screen photo. The depth that lens adds is incredible and to my eye it is more due to the rendering than the depth of the subjects in the image. Beautiful!

[@Vahagraphy]

Nice observation Bill. I have to agree. this 300 AF is a special lens. the quality of the glass is rock solid.

[@billb8262]

@@Vahagraphy thanks to this video it's going on my short list of must-haves! Much appreciated and great work on all your videos.

[@jaimeduncan6167]

It's outstanding , and very good compositions. Thanks for sharing

[@Vahagraphy]

Glad you enjoyed it. 300mm f4 AF lens is outstanding.

[@adriandanby2843]

Just bought one to go on my D850....Happy Bunny

[@Vahagraphy]

Very Nice. Congrats. Enjoy this fantastic 300.

[@victorholmes6559]

Good day, I always enjoy your delivery. Take care.

[@Vahagraphy]

Thank you Victor. Glad you enjoy the videos. Rock on Brotha.

[@ele4853]

I have one. It is a great lens. I use it on my D500 with great results. Even though it's a "screw" autofocus lens it focuses really fast. I love the bouquet out of it. I also have the AF-S 300mm It is so good that it still being produced and sold. The PF version I did not get. It is still too much money for the lens. Maybe one day when I see a good deal I will get one. It is really light. That is attractive.

[@korn411]

Could I ask, how is the focusing speed of the af D version compare with the af-s version you own?

[@peterkin1010]

Loved the review. The pic of the helicopter was incredible...IMHO good enough for a publicly pic for Sikorski . If it isn't being published then it should be.

[@johntravena119]

The tree is a ginkgo. Nice review! 👍

[@Vahagraphy]

Thank you John. That tree has a few weeks of that bloom, once its gone , gotta wait one full year.

[@sergiootarola]

really good review and the images wow!!!, the contrast and 3D pop looks really good. Could you please make a short video about the focus limiter of this lens?.....it seems its a variable distance limiter and I spotted a mark as far as 30meters, whereas most lenses nowadays hace just one position (3 to 6 meters most cases). It would be fine to see how much the AF improves when set near to infinity in the limiter (10meters and beyond). your videos rock!!!

[@Vahagraphy]

Thank you Sergio. Appreciate it my man. Glad you enjoy the content. I try my best. Let me see what I can do and when I will revisit this lens again. I will make note. thank you again for the compliment.

[@ZoneTelevision]

Older Nikkor Lenses are the best kept secrets I want the F2.8 ED

[@Vahagraphy]

ahh the 2.8. someone is selling the 300mm f2.8 VRi in my local market. Your probably talking about the older AF 300mm f2.8. which is a monster. haha probably heavy .

[@visionz_n_media]

Great video V. I still love shooting with my vintage lenses from my ED to my AIS lens. Those old lenses have character that these new lens don’t have. Don’t get me wrong I love the crisp images I get from my new lenses but the flaws and characteristics of those old lens makes for a very unique image in my opinion.

[@Vahagraphy]

TJ, it has weight. the image has weight to it. Does that make sense. I can't explain it, well I will try, You know when you increase the contrast on a raw file in post, it just takes away from other paets of the image, but when images are born with that deep contrast. ahhhh its solid. Leica character comes to mind with this AF 300.

[@visionz_n_media]

@@Vahagraphy ohhh yea I get it. Sometimes I go out and do nature shots and I’ll bring two cameras. One with an old lens and one with an afs zoom just to compare the shots and you are absolutely right. I never really knew how to phrase it but that’s it.

[@Vahagraphy]

@@visionz_n_media RIGHT. only people that have witnessed this know what we mean about these old lenses.

[@413TomaccoRoad]

I used to have the 300 2.8 ais. It was spectacular. I have this now - I'd say it's between 90 and 95% of the goodness of the 2.8.

[@Farrinah]

Von der Schärfe nehmen sich beide nichts, sind auf gleicher Höhe. Das 2.8 hat aber Vorteile im Fokus durch die offenere Blende.

[@413TomaccoRoad]

@@Farrinah ?

[@Farrinah]

@@413TomaccoRoad In terms of sharpness, the two are on the same level. However, the 2.8 has advantages in focus due to the wider aperture.

[@413TomaccoRoad]

@@Farrinah I never used the 2.8 at 2.8 anyway.

[@Vahagraphy]

Sold this lens and I regret it so much. I will buy it back.

[@MrK67017]

Yes...Just found one on EBay in excellent condition.

[@Vahagraphy]

Nice K. Hope it works out for you and you win the auction. good luck.

[@MrK67017]

@@Vahagraphy Thank you, my friend. I've heard so many great reviews about the Nikon 300 and yours just pushed me over the top. I'm a sucker for crinkle finished lens :)

[@Vahagraphy]

@@MrK67017 Great lens, at a great price. yes it doesnt have all the bells and whistles of newer lenses but hey, for the price, cant complain.

[@jacasan2000]

I have same beauty , I pay a little more but is a excellent lens, like you said , need to know it limitations like af speed drill noise , weight, non vr .. but with right shutter speeds and the limiter you can get a lot keepers pics.. 😎😎👋🏼👋🏼also I have a 80-200 2.8 push pull ..built like tank.. never go wrong with this kind of lenses

[@Vahagraphy]

On point Jacasan. The bike shots at the end of this video I have the limiter set to full and still nailed almost every picture and on top of that it was getting dark. Not shot in optimal light. Amazing lens like you said. I just bought a 30 year old Nikon 180mm f2.8 AF lens. Again built like a tank and I love it. Review coming soon on that lens.

[@Stormwatch153]

Superb review and Photography,

[@Vahagraphy]

Thank you Stormwatch. Glad you enjoyed the review. More to come. :)

[@othomophoto8433]

I recently got one of this lens. I find I have to bump up the sharpness to have a decent image. Wide open its very soft. I'm still putting it through it's paces. Yet do decide if I'll keep it.

[@diveaddict6885]

Great lens sharp and good price

[@efreutel]

>spectacular photos! 👍👍👍

[@photographerswithoutborder7302]

I wish you the best of luck and more wonderful work, perfect lens and Very cheap, thanks a lot

[@thedrunkweddingphotographer]

Btw, this video is how I found your channel two years ago.

[@Vahagraphy]

Rock on bro. lets do a podcast soon. ill let you know.

[@ivanfelipeferreira1533]

Acabei de adquirir uma aqui ni Brasil em estado mint e vou montar ela na minha D7000 no próximo final de semana, parabéns pelo excelente review

[@Vahagraphy]

Muito obrigado. Este 300 é ótimo e bem construído. Aproveite.

[@Capcity44]

I prefer the IQ from the this 300 F4 and its successor, the 300mm F4 AF-S above that of the 300mm PF.

[@Vahagraphy]

Oh really. thats interesting to know. Well Im curious to find out how it shoots. Maybe I'll rent one. The PF that is.

[@Capcity44]

@@Vahagraphy Clients and casual observers will not likely notice any difference. The gains in portability outweigh the small loss in IQ . I photograph wildlife, and the lightweight PF makes hiking gear around much easier.

[@Vahagraphy]

@@Capcity44 I remember my days when I owned the 300mm 2.8 VRI that was an impressive piece of glass. But your right about the new PF. Now I must try one. haha

[@lesnytropiciel]

Fantastic lens and photos 👍🤞👊

[@Vahagraphy]

thank you so much Lesny. I think I will take it out this weekend and take some shots in nature. We will see. Have't had allot of free time lately

[@lesnytropiciel]

@@Vahagraphy enjoy your weekend GL&hf🤞👍👊

[@Vahagraphy]

@@lesnytropiciel Thank you , same to you

[@flyon9694]

i really love the photos!! i think the tree is a ginko tree from what i can see anyway

[@Vahagraphy]

Thank you Flyon. Yes it is, hehe, Love the tree. great lens too btw lol

[@flyon9694]

@@Vahagraphy the lens does look amazing!

[@billyy123]

I have this lens when I went back to buy his 1.4 converter he try to buy the lens back of me he had bought the 2.8 but said it was to heavy don't no if it was just that I never sold it back to him nice lens

[@Vahagraphy]

I tried using a 1.4 X but I dont think they are compatible.

[@gerarddonovan4145]

Excellent video Vahagan

[@Vahagraphy]

Thank you Gerard. :) Rock n Roll!!!

[@moneyshift8190]

The image you took of the car forced me to buy one of these.

[@Vahagraphy]

GREAT!!! Hope you are enjoying the lens. :)

[@ericfreutel8240]

Great review! Thank you!

[@Vahagraphy]

You are very welcome. Rock n Roll!!!!

[@negativemoments]

Great review buddy👍🏼. Are you not recommending it for mirrorless body's just because of having to manually focusing the lens? I'm comfortable manual focusing lenses and i am considering it for my F3 film camera and maybe occasionally adapting it to my sony mirrorless..

[@NoOnesNothing]

Nice review! Subbed.

[@Vahagraphy]

Thank you Pavan. Happy to have you join Vahagraphy!! Rock on!!!

[@rindrr]

I’m currently in the market for a new lens. I use a Nikon D3100 and honestly I may just have to get this

[@Vahagraphy]

Just make sure the 3100 has focus motors. Have you AF'ed with another D lens on that camera?

[@rindrr]

@@Vahagraphy Yes

[@elit7538]

Great lens! I also have this gem of a lens...worth every penny! I'd like to ask the way you focused on the cyclist..are you moving the focus point as the subjet is moving? Can you do a tutorial on how to track effectively moving subjects? Thanks in adcance!

[@Vahagraphy]

Hello Flordeles. Yes great lens and a heck of a bargain. When I captured these guys on bikes, I set the focus point to group AF. While shooting all i did was pan the camera. I did not move the focus point. I let the camera pan to the moving. however, yes I will make a video in the future on moving targets and different techniques I use. Thanks for the comment FG.

[@Kurtcorp]

Nice review thanks

[@Vahagraphy]

Glad you enjoyed the review.

[@AntPDC]

The Nikkor 300mm f/4.5 ED IF AI-s is also highly-regarded, if one is OK with manual focussing. The Angry Photographer says it's the best ever Nikkor 300mm for IQ.

[@Vahagraphy]

Yes that lens is good to if you don't mind MF. For me shooting a 300 in photography. I need it to AF. Could be a killer video lens that AIS you mentioned

[@dandruff9244]

Same lens cost me 200 uk its a brilliant lens and the bokeh is stunning

[@Vahagraphy]

This is a great lens for the money. I agree.

[@ewyss9206]

The trees are Ginkos, highly revered in Asian medicine!

[@Vahagraphy]

Thanks for that E Wyss. Wow I didn't know that. Thats pretty cool. They are magnificent trees and so amazing to look at and enjoy. The color is out of this world.

[@DAVE_WHITE]

I have the AF-S and it is great as well

[@Vahagraphy]

You have the AF-S F/4 ? great lens, not too heavy and sharp. there are bargains on that lens right now used. I've seen them for under $400.

[@DAVE_WHITE]

@@Vahagraphy Yes usedphotopro had a few I snatched one right up and it has a good SO FAR AF-S motor:)

[@davidcollazos8985]

I had one, but the spherochromatism green color in the bokeh wide open was awful...so I ended up upgrading to the much better af-s version.

[@bmx08]

Great video. Thanks 🇧🇷

[@Vahagraphy]

Glad you enjoyed the video BMX

[@Audimann]

Ok I can get one for 300 bucks mint but already have the 300mm F4 PF and the 300mm F4 ED IF. I honestly do not need a third 300mm but I can not stop thinking about it. Guess I will flip a coin or something to get rid of this dilemma. 😅

[@Vahagraphy]

heheh If you already have the PF, I'd say no need for this lens. If you are a collector and want something from the old days , metal body maybe yes. well. for 300 dollars. sure give it a go.

[@Audimann]

@@Vahagraphy maybe you are right. The PF covers all my need and getting a third 300mm is insane. But still....... 🤔🤔 Lets see how I think about it after a good night of sleep.

[@Audimann]

​@@VahagraphyOk went to the shop and picked it up. Near mint condition and a 82mm uv filter and sturdy lens case included. First pics are promising. Have to fine tune the AF a little bit I think but no problem. A real piece of metal. Yes😀

[@telkirton]

Thanks for the info..

[@Vahagraphy]

Your welcome Tel. Glad the video helped.

[@bonaventura24]

Beautiful pictures and a very useful review that helps a lot. I wonder: would you recommend it for airplane photography?

[@Vahagraphy]

Tricky because depending on how fast they fly. I'd do with an AF-s lens for anything serious with planes.

[@bonaventura24]

Thanks for the answer. Yes, ultimately I also chose an AF-S one.

[@mohammadvarzideh780]

Hello vahagn and happy new year. Today i wathed your fantastic review . the best practical review I've seen . It was really useful and help me to decide better. I found one of this in new and unused but the price is high (650$) . I hope to find another cheaper. Would you tell me that does it work with nikon tc's in terms of AF ? Regards. Mohammad.

[@Vahagraphy]

Thank you MV. Glad you enjoyed the review. To be honest I have an older TCIII version 2 and it doesn't even mount to it. It's not compatible. That's the TC that I have. In my openion I would not use this lens with any TC. If you plan on using TC with these 300mm lenses, I would get an AF-S more modern lens for better AF performance. Using this AF lens without a TC, yes perfect, no problem.

[@user-lh4nl5zh8w]

want to buy an old version of Nikon ED AF Nikkor 300mm 1: 4, i just bought a skywatcher tracker. Do you recommend this 300mm old lens is good in astrophotography? I have an old D7000 nikon

[@Vahagraphy]

I dont do much astro to be honest. but from what I've used, tis lens is great.

[@cronufc]

bada bing bada boom - awesome

[@Vahagraphy]

Thank you D C . ROCK N ROLL!!!

[@Audimann]

I will get the 300mm F4 ED IF. So the version that came after the one you are reviewing in this video. Should be in mint condition for 450 bucks. Will arrive in a couple of days or so. No VR but 450 bucks for this lens is crazy IMO.

[@Vahagraphy]

How do you like it? Did you get it yet?

[@Audimann]

@@Vahagraphy nope, still waiting for it to arrive at the store where I will pick it up. They already said my order was delayed. Enough vacant jobs but available workers are scarce apparantly in these times. Yep, our economy is doing great🙄 When it arrives I will give my findings. No worry.

[@Audimann]

@@Vahagraphy ok got it😃. And as promised in a very mint condition. The serial number starts with a 3 so that was the last batch. After 50 shots my first impression is wow!!!! Bloody sharp already from f4. Great saturation too. I did a quick comparison with my 300mm F4 PF VR but do not see significant differences. Even the salesguy at the store was a bit confused about the price. 450???? That can't be right! 😅

[@Vahagraphy]

@@Audimann congrats on the lens. Enjoy. Im telling you, this 300 F4 is a hidden gem. Built like a tank and the sharpness and contrast out of this old lens is amazing.

[@Audimann]

@@Vahagraphy 👍👍👍

[@alohaleslie9407]

Oh Oh! I think I made a mistake by recently purchasing the Nikon 70mm-300mm lens. I'm a newbie and thought I was making a good purchase but I'm pretty sure your 300mm shoots much better quality than mine. :( What are your thoughts? Thanks so much.

[@Vahagraphy]

Aloha Leslie!! Actually your 70-300 is a good lens. Its a good starter long range lens. As a newbie you will be able to create and practice photography virtually with any lens. AS far as better optics, Yes the 300mm F/4 is a professional grade lens with amazing quality. I have many starter photographer friends that love the 70-300mm. Good luck with your new adventure in photography. Enjoy every minute.

[@eikonise]

Those are Ginkgo Biloba trees, BTW...

[@Vahagraphy]

Love those trees.

[@albertjimenez7896]

A significant number of pros continue to choose Nikon's AF-D lens lineup for a variety of reasons, including the low number of elements, unparalleled color and contrast tonality, and unique character. Regardless of Nikon's autofocus speeds or technical breakthroughs, these lenses will never be replaced. Nikon needs a screwdriver adaptor immediately and should be able to produce one given that the technology exists. Sony has created the Sony LA-EA5 auto focus screwdrive adapter for A-mount lenses on E-bodies from old Sony and Minolta DSLR lenses. Nikon has no excuse for not being able to do this since the technology currently exists. Nikon can only get many people to stop using DSLRs and attract young people around the world who are on a tight budget by making a screwdrive lens adapter for the D lens series.

[@yangproductions1617]

Very nice review! I'd like to ask that whether this lens is suitable for tracking moving subjects like shooting sports events when mounting on a pro body like the D4? Thanks

[@williamfeather3915]

Thank you for this review. I have this same lens picked it up for $200 on Facebook market place. When I use the FTX adaptar with the Z6 mirrorless camera I have this issue: it only lets me use this lens at the highest aperture. any suggestions?

[@Vahagraphy]

Hello William. Never used the FTX adapter. Are you talking about the FTZ adapter. however, will the lens let you manually set your aperture when the adapter is on the Z6. Let me expierment with the lens and the Z6 and get back to you.

[@miloradkaravidin8818]

Seems nice lens!!!

[@Jwitherow1964]

Good work rock on

[@Vahagraphy]

YEs. its killer. hehe

[@Vahagraphy]

@@Jwitherow1964 thank you jr. rock n roll !!!

[@Shinigami7of1]

Will there be a problem if I try to adapt this to mirrorless? I read that you need to switch the manual switch on the lens and the body for it to work. I plan to only use it in manual mode on my apsc and m43 cameras.

[@bryanewyatt]

What TC would you use for this on a DSLR with an internal focus motor? I've got a D7000.

[@bngr_bngr]

Nikon didn’t make a TC for AF type lens which this 300mm is one of them. AF-I and AF-S lenses have TC’s that are autofocus.

[@francisszeto791]

Do you know where can I buy the nikon drop in 39mm NC clear filter 2478NASI for my nikon 300mm f4? I search and can't find any. Thanks.

[@acekat7009]

Hi Vaha! Will you recommend this lens for drangonfly photos and butterfly photos?and may be some birds I use nikon d700 and nikon d300 right now I am thinking of getting one

[@CarlyWaarly]

Motion blur speed setting should be at least 1/300th.

[@arbolita99]

Hi! How will it work with wildlife photography? Thanks

[@Vahagraphy]

Hi Antonella. It should work fine if you get used to this lenses drawbacks. Obviously the newer lenses are faster, silent focus, faster focus, coating, VR, capatable with TCs. You wouldn't get any of that with this lens, but if you don't mind any of those features then yes it will be fine. After all, your not paying thousands for this 300mm . I would give it a shot. Why not, doesn't hurt.

[@neilcole3406]

The guy was staring at me,then he walked towards me, and then he punched me in the face!😂

[@Vahagraphy]

me? who? lol

[@Vahagraphy]

ohh the guy i was taking pics of? I have a lens that plays double duty as a bat. lol this 300 right here.

[@neilcole3406]

@@Vahagraphy l always find a sturdy tripod doubles up as a good beating stick!

[@dennistsurkan8932]

Hi! I'm wondering if this will work on my 35mm Nikon N80. As far as I understand correctly the AF-S model should and that's looking like $500, but am wondering how this one would work.

[@Vahagraphy]

I don't think it will AF. Only with cameras with built in focus motors. Yes the AF-S version is a better bet for that type of camera Im guessing. That said. Never used or owned a N80 so don't quote me on it.

[@rschellie]

Have you had any issues with Chromatic Aberrations or fringing in low like/high contrast with this lens? I purchased the Nikon 80-200mm f/2.8 and the Chromatic Aberration and fringing is so bad it is unusable and I want to replace it. I am looking at this lens or the 180mm f/2.8. I photograph mostly owls and I really need low light performance. Thank you

[@Vahagraphy]

Hello Rschellie. Thank you for the sub. appreciate it and welcome to vahagraphy. I mostly use this lens when there is enough light to shoot. Haven't had any issues with CA and fringing. However, my guess would be it would perform abou tht esame as the 80-200mm 2.8. I haven't used that lens you mentioned in a long time so don't quote me on that. But from my usage, since I use it with allot of light It suites my needs well. If your looking for a low light performer. This would not be a lens I would get. Your better off buying a 70-200 2.8 vri and a tc 1.4x for better results. first you wil have faster focus and that lens is more modern and it is an afs. sure its going to cost you a little bit more money however that lens with the 1.4x TC would be a much better performer.

[@rschellie]

@@Vahagraphy Thank you

[@Vahagraphy]

@@rschellie anytime, and good luck, let me know what you decided to do and how it turned out.

[@magnificatscriptorium]

Those trees are called Gingko