No Fly Zone Battleship - Ultimate Admiral Dreadnoughts

[@atigerclaw]

Look at the bright side. The enemy captured your ship. Now it's no longer your problem.

[@OptiPopulus]

That BB is gonna get paased around like a hooker because of the insane rate of crew los. It's going to change hands every battle.

[@ejoty_6128]

[Jean Bart AA battleship retrofit plan]

[@paulus12345]

There were loads of fly's hovering over the corpse of your dead ship!!! 🙂

[@nvelsen1975]

14:50 So that thing went through half its ammo in a minute. 😆

[@bamafan-in-OZ]

Its the IJN Slideshow

[@Luthius-bp2nx]

I came to your channel for naval combat; I stayed for my love of your hilariously impractical designs

[@chaosengine4597]

ONE TIME, I'd like to see Stealth taking on a a reasonable adversary. Like CAs would have been the thing to go against.

[@advorak8529]

Your eyes definitely were larger than your battleship.

[@Paul_Bedford]

Probably should have put some larger secondaries so that they can pen and maybe cause some ammo detonations because those cause quite a lot of fires.

[@chromeman14]

But that means less barrels, doesn't it?

[@SephirothRyu]

Since you ran out of frame rate before running out of space for guns, probably should have spread them out more, and had some larger ones.

[@TheCaptainbeefylog]

Might have helped having a few deck torps to quickly kill the first enemy ship before the decks got swept clean.

[@Darbstir29]

I looked at the thumbnail and audibly went "JESUS CHRIST"

[@curiousentertainment3008]

7:14 Yamato had over 150 anti aircraft guns when she was sunk by aircraft in 1945.

[@lamarwatsonjr6034]

162x25mm 24x127mm

[@walterengler5709]

A hilarious try ... lol. LOVED the design.

[@brandonclark435]

The Imperial Japanese Navy Kido Butai's worse nightmare.

[@stevequerin2504]

That Secondary Tower can House the Funnel.

[@thecman26]

That's a lose lose scenario! Kobayashi Maru simulation.

[@austink4712]

I'm glad you took the ching lee methodology of secondary guns and just said yes

[@chef2341]

Ouch. Tough battle

[@merafirewing6591]

When the IJN decides to bolt on alot of AA guns when the 25mm proved to be not enough.

[@Emperor-Julius-Caesar]

i was expecting it to fire then explode

[@beardedphobos5211]

Absolutely loved this sucks you got no points but in the long run it will make victory that much better at the end

[@odd-ov4gf]

Ah yes, USS Second Amendment Right

[@MrsGozdzikova]

Try it out with 4 inch guns, so you can give some armor to them. They will not blow up in a whiff and you may, may may actually achieve something.

[@Rastek19]

I wonder how many planes that ship could take down in game... The bane of enemy aircraft carriers!

[@Risk_of_monky_2]

Honestly it’s basically a lightly armed U.S ship

[@ilitar_II]

Nice Almost got that first one tho

[@edmanning8545]

well , you cannot win big if you don't risk big. It was worth a try.

[@notthatbad42]

i saw the thumbnail, instantly clicked

[@leonthomasjoshuarichter8175]

If the Yamato had this AA-Armament, maybe Japan would have come out of the war victorious.

[@curiousentertainment3008]

He has about what the Yamato had in 1945 but no 5 inch aa guns so it’s worse in range but better in elevation

[@Sillines_Prime]

Hear! The Siren Song Call of Death (ultrakill 7-2 theme #2)

[@alphakiller2269]

Love the videos

[@avmlaa6639]

Indeed, trying to use historical* amounts of tertiaries on battleships without a balance mod that regards this issue of ships surrendering when there's simply no secondaries crew that nobody cares about anyway was NOT a good idea!

[@Vehehehe]

I hope they add carrier ill surely work to get money and buy the game

[@andrewmencer916]

You easily could have put like 200 quad mount for the 2 in on your ship

[@Stealth17Gaming]

Maybe, but my frame rate was 1 frame per 3 seconds. I didn't have the patience for that ;)

[@stevequerin2504]

In Real Life, I consider the 2-Inch Naval Artillery Gun as A Joke for Real Life WW2 Warfare. The 2-Inch Naval Artillery Gun are Signal Guns (whatever that is) for Modern Day Warfare. However, because Modern Day Warships aren't Armored like WW2 Warships, the 2-Inch Naval Artillery Gun may be viable for Close-In Surface-To-Surface Combat. Within the ULTIMATE ADMIRAL: DREADNOUGHTS Video Game System, there is no Aerial Combat Mechanics; and, I am okay with that. However, ULTIMATE ADMIRAL: DREADNOUGHTS does feature 19th Century Warship Designs & Naval Combat. In Real Life, the 2-Inch Naval Artillery Gun was a Practical Weapon System during the 1800s before The Age Of Sail came to an end. Within the ULTIMATE ADMIRAL: DREADNOUGHTS Video Game System, I don't use 2.0-Inch thru 2.9-Inch Naval Gun Sizes on my Warship Designs. I don't use the Metric System; because, I am a Gen-X American; and, I found the Metric System to be lacking for my FLOWER CHILD PROJECT Manned Spacecraft Design Concept, back in 1985. I don't use Fractional Inch Measurements for my Real Life & Game System (not just UA:D) Naval Artillery Gun Sizes. Within the ULTIMATE ADMIRAL: DREADNOUGHTS Video Game System, I use the 1.1-Inch Gun Size for representing .50 Caliber Machine Guns and 1-Inch Gatling Guns and 20mm Machine Cannons and 40mm Machine Cannons of the 1800s thru the 1940s -- Tertiary Armament within Real Life National Naval Warship Design Circles. With 20th Century Warship Designs within the ULTIMATE ADMIRAL: DREADNOUGHTS Video Game System, I view the 1.1-Inch Guns as being Anti-Personnel Weapon Systems. Therefore, within the ULTIMATE ADMIRAL: DREADNOUGHTS Video Game System, 1.1-Inch Armed 20th Century Warship Designs are designed for Close-In Naval Combat like 19th Century Warship Designs. Within the ULTIMATE ADMIRAL: DREADNOUGHTS Video Game System, the 1.1-Inch Guns and the 3.0-Inch Guns are used primarily as Weapon Systems that target Civilian Naval Vessels (aka Transports). However, my ULTIMATE ADMIRAL: DREADNOUGHTS Video Game System TBs and DDs are armed with 1.1-Inch Guns and 3.0-Inch Guns for the Weight Savings those Naval Guns provide; and, because they are expected to get very close to Enemy Warships for Torpedo Attacks. I use HE Shells for targeting the Superstructures at Long Ranges; and, for burning the Warship to weaken the Armor Plating. I use AP Shells for targeting the Hull, and Main Deck Turret Guns, at Short Ranges. Tertiary Armament (1.1-Inch Guns and 3.0-Inch Guns) are primarily Anti-Personnel Weapon Systems that target the Superstructures (Main Tower and Secondary Tower and Funnels). That is what I did in NAVYFIELD. Because my NAVYFIELD HE Shells were Heavy, or Super Heavy, and my NAVYFIELD AP Shells were Light, there was a change in Shell Velocity when I switch between HE Shells and AP Shells; and, I would Snipe at Enemy Warships with AP Shells that were outside my Visual Range.

[@talamioros]

so glad you discovered the Caps Lock key, friend

[@stevequerin2504]

@@talamioros ... I write a lot of Prose Form Literary Works. -- I am the creator of the FLOWER CHILD PROJECT Manned Spacecraft Design Concept I don't have time for Internet Literacy BS.

[@merafirewing6591]

​@@stevequerin2504 the metric system is for heathens anyway.

[@Phil_is_cool]

Bro he ain't even using with planes he used it with frikin 2 inches

[@SuwinTzi]

I was...expecting something against carrier aviation not a squadron of battleships.

[@AdmiralDevil]

thats a lotta 40mms

[@ahmedisonthego]

CAs would be a better choice but BCs were max. BBs are just too much, it's 1950

[@Finnfzhgjkjgj]

such a cool vid

[@fenrin49]

carrier update when

[@Tigerpanzer6666]

make a anti air bttle ship it can have only 1 main gun but its small and can have 1-2 barrels no more then that

[@Sargonarhes]

More guns = more dakka

[@horizon1043]

Also hi stealth

[@Stealth17Gaming]

Hi

[@BlackSkull1984]

i bet we name it IJN Asashi

[@Yaivenov]

Too bad there will never be planes.

[@horizon1043]

I think I’m early

[@iivaripaakkonen2699]

Needs more DAKKA!!!

[@randomguy4616]

More like no fps zone..

[@AmericanBattlewagons1944]

why didn't he go with the desgin from his Japanese campaign

[@六工業のカービィ]

Watching you over 3 and an half years by now, you get little points in taskmasters because you risk too much too often.

[@Stealth17Gaming]

True

[@MarkLin77]

what game is this

[@Stealth17Gaming]

Ultimate Admiral Dreadnoughts

[@ChristopherSloane]

Well that was dissapointing.

[@derp_mc_der7461]

Hello

[@OldDragon0]

Is this game just a copy of warship gunner 2 from the PlayStation 2? It sure looks like it.

[@TorielloAt170]

Ugh

[@Paul_Bedford]

Probably should have put some larger secondaries so that they can pen and maybe cause some ammo detonations because those cause quite a lot of fires.

[@Avgeek1719]

Hello

[@boinkyummy2464]

Hi