NoahJ456 Punches BACK!

[@zxjacksterxz]

The fact that Noah says all of this without receipts… what a pathetic excuse for a human being.

[@Sethanon3000]

this comment section is one person and the creator. Not anymore cuz I'm commenting now.

[@NotSoSeriousGaming]

@@Sethanon3000 hahaha

[@fahadmalik8862]

And he conversated before knowing the age. After hearing the age he continued to talk and skyped her. What was the basis for "come visit" line was it sparingly or was it intentional. Like "I always wanted a friend from ireland (smiley emoji) not intentional. Or was it prodecimal. Meaning later visit. Like 3-5+ years. Meaning it wasn't imminent. Or in the accompance of her family. And let's look at the year of 2018 and the social discourse amoungst couples at that time. 60% of the ages 16-22 experienced difficulties in relationships. Going back to "age". By old and current the mental maturity of girls has been changed slightly. In that girls maturity is still fast but identification is diverse. She refuses to show the dm's and if Lex has it he will show them.

[@NotSoSeriousGaming]

@@fahadmalik8862 dude sounds like sneako talking about maturity age as if ages and rules don't count as u want to discuss maturity age

[@fahadmalik8862]

​@@NotSoSeriousGamingsneako. That's Islam which I have already covered. And I can reference my evidence for that don't bring religion into this. I didn't say anything like that.

[@fahadmalik8862]

​​@@NotSoSeriousGamingThey do count. I am talking about his violation of those rules. The only instance was the participation of her in zhouse. And that doesn't count as any of the afflictions. I am talking about facts. And that includes psychology. Why does it include psychology because A he did nothing illegal so the only cause for concern is psychological possible notion of danger. She refuses to show dms hence forth it's hearsay so both of them are null until evidence is shown. What rules were broken between Alex and Lex. Go on tell me. I am waiting. What's your reasoning for this oh yeah psychology. 180 guy

[@fahadmalik8862]

"he even made you feel part of the family". "Whatever goes on between friends is between friends". Yep this a contradiction. A preposition is a pretext with dependents within regards of context. And the "prejudice" is the context.. Also noah refues to show receipts. They would have had them. Many other people mentioned it. But you ignore this why? Since you like pre-context so much. And if you call out lex on being incorrect about Minilad which is highly unlikely. A guest list happens all the time. As well as a booking list. Will you call out the inaccuracy about the zhouse clip? Nope you didn't make any remarks on his ex-gf nor anyone else. But Lex. I was impartial and answered everything logically. Because I am not and never will be a hypocrite. I work too hard on documentations.

[@NotSoSeriousGaming]

He Also chcked Lex's instagram and he has a post from April this year showing himself and some ZHouse members together including JC...Apparently to Lex, JC blocked him like 2 years ago, so why would they be together if they hated each other? That's just a few things my friend found and showed me

[@fahadmalik8862]

​​@@NotSoSeriousGaming Blocked on twitter. Also a picture that is posted might be from a while ago Noah's DMS are all the way from 2021 his only recent interaction was your modded map Blocked on twitter. Also a picture that is posted might be from a while ago Noah's DMS are all the way from 2021 his only recent interaction was your modded map He kept him on Instagram because of presentations

[@fahadmalik8862]

The point about the cheating notes is consistency as he claimed lex had adult friends to talk to. But provides no evidence and the zhouse clip is from 2021 talking about 2018 which is inaccurate from noah. Lex said he wasn't there. Milo said he wasn't present or didn't have enough to confidently say. Matt is biased as he left lex on read. Without listening to other testimonies. The only source noah has is one third person reference. Since he said "everyone who was there". Everyone should be more than 1. The rest involving Alex. Lex's media shows her initiating the conversation and her initiating it on Skype also. From her own words and from 2nd person sources. Nothing illegal or ill mannered happened. And the context of "wanting a friend to come visit" needs to be investigated but she refuses to show her DM evidence despite saying this. And he views on Mr beast and being biased in supporting Lex's ex. And no words of condemning her despite saying the inequalities women face. If she wishes to help women in terms of inequalities she has would have been equivocal in her approach and called out reagun also. But she did not.

[@NotSoSeriousGaming]

@fahadmalik8862 actually I had a friend shownme him and jc were talking within the time period and that he was alone and he friended lex to check all this ... then he even showed me a screen shot of lex liking mini lads posts on x also...

[@fahadmalik8862]

​@@NotSoSeriousGamingwhat where. Show the evidence then.

[@fahadmalik8862]

​@@NotSoSeriousGaming"actually I had a friend shownme and jc were within the time period and that he was alone and he friended lex to check all of this... Then he even showed me a screenshot of lex liking mini post on x also..." - NotSoSeriousGaming Which time period specify please. The ability to view likes has been removed since June 11 2024 "This week we’re making Likes private for everyone to better protect your privacy. - You will still be able to see posts you have liked (but others cannot). - Like count and other metrics for your own posts will still show up under notifications. - You will no longer see who liked someone else’s post. - A post’s author can see who liked its posts. 10:01 PM · Jun 11, 2024 · 229.2M Views"

[@fahadmalik8862]

​@@NotSoSeriousGaming"Noah shows a clip from 2018 talking about that Z House when in reality Lex was referring to the 2021 Z House." - almightycx "Noah points out the zhouse 3 not happening in 2018 but Lex talks about zhouse 3 in 2021" - zGozner You still haven't mentioned this at all. Why? You said you're not taking sides. Hmmm...? 🤔

[@fahadmalik8862]

Groomed? So if we say a woman groomed a boy despite him dming her first. What would the public say? What would you say? And it was under 3 years. And he conducted it before whilst under Canada laws. And the question did he initate any physical contact while in California? From his words "no" well if you call his claim 'hearsay' then you must call her claims 'hearsay' too. But the bias is apparent. Meaning you are contradictory. Going from social behaviour of younger teenagers in California how many of them conducted the relationships lex and his ex had? And how many of them conducted intimacy by number? Did lex conduct intimacy? No. So by definition he is not viable to be charged with pdpila. Grooming is manipulation of an incentive. Where did he do this behaviour? Show me. If you can't you're a hypocrite.

[@NotSoSeriousGaming]

@fahadmalik8862 there's picture of them in bed top less before she was 18 he even shared that in his document

[@NotSoSeriousGaming]

Granted that doesn't prove they had sexual intercourse

[@NotSoSeriousGaming]

@fahadmalik8862 also doesn't matter who started talking to who. If you use ur power and status to talk to minors then you have pushed the line.. end off.

[@fahadmalik8862]

​@@NotSoSeriousGamingBoth of them were minors like I said what was the incentive. I asked I still haven't received an answer

[@fahadmalik8862]

​@@NotSoSeriousGamingwhom is topless? Both of them? I will look at this materials also. Were they in US or Canada and if it was US then contact which is the first placeholder of caution. No relationship holds a legal bounding except marriage hence two friends in bed man and woman let's reverse it. Woman is 18-19 man is 16. Both are friends. From this behaviour alone. What rules are broken(this isn't a biased question but an rule information one). If this exceeds it will be enough to label him at wrong and her supplementary as per her emotive preclination in tweets etc. If it was Canada then he isn't at fault. Especially if nothing happened. But this isn't enough evidence to claim sexual intercourse. But if this is your basis then you're using psychology not imperical evidence. But you claim I'm talking like sneako. I don't care about him. He's a fool. I care more about refuting scholars. Also if we are going to get into this area. Girls underage lay in bed together are you going to tell me it can't be predatory even those in a relationship.

[@fahadmalik8862]

he was accused of a serious thing and what happened. People say if you are innocent then don't worry. But what happens socially? You get destroyed and incriminated. Both of them sided with her and his KZbin career was on the end. So yeah do think he has a viable reason for saying that etc. And it's to show his old friends that if you want to believe her then look at what she says. You still believe her? It's not accusing him it's showing him as his bias for her should change once JC sees her accusing him of cheating as it goes against JC. It wasn't focused on believing her. "If you want to believe her". As they believed everything she said before hand and if they carried on believing her that would mean they would believe this accusation. And since this goes against him he wouldn't believe it. Hence putting in a contradiction in their morality scale. Lex went too far with the playstation topic though.

[@NotSoSeriousGaming]

I've never believed the bulk of what she claims anyway

[@fahadmalik8862]

​@@NotSoSeriousGaminghuh yes you did. What save face is this. You called him an abuser instantly. I said he possibly hurt her under the influence of drugs. So my statement was based on material statements not bias.

[@fahadmalik8862]

"the fact that he had sexual intercourse with a minor" He didn't she fantasised over him. Her doing illicit acts over his content does not equal "sexual intercourse". That literally doesn't make sense. You said you aren't taking sides. What kind of deduction is that. That's without facts only speculation and accusations. That's not a fact at all. Where is your preliminary source? As that source talks about something else entirely. That's called taking something out of context. But if you think that's sexual intercourse I guess it explains your weird video with that girl hole you play a game where you shoot water at CGI female models. So by your own understanding you were having sexual intercourse with a CGI character. When I mentioned the subject of Lex and his GF I was impartial and logically read her statements and called out Lex. But after more media has been shown. And per pretense as well as emotional states. His statement on he never conducted the behaviour is more trustworthy. I am no hypocrite hence why I called out Lex when I commented under your first video.

[@NotSoSeriousGaming]

@fahadmalik8862 There are dates of birth are shown on the video, which shows her age, and he even admitted that they spoke and got together when she was underage. I remember seeing in one of his videos he mentioned how they started talking when she was 15 then later started dating. I have no idea how u then link that with a game... they are not even linked in the slightest...

[@fahadmalik8862]

​@@NotSoSeriousGamingyou mentioned sexual intercourse. Where is the evidence for your claim. Yes they both met as minors but didn't date until the ages mentioned.