Why the First Aircraft Launched from a Carrier is Last to Land

[@NotWhatYouThink]

Play War Thunder for FREE on PC, Playstation and Xbox. Click the link to download the game and get your exclusive bonus now: playwt.link/notwhatyouthink2024

[@kryrins]

For free at the cost of your soul.

[@bryanst.martin7134]

If you knew you had less than a generation to prepare whether you live or die, and if you die(your body/avatar) where do You wind up? But if you said yeah, well, and kept playing distracting games, will you curse those in the end because they won't risk their savings for their family for you who didn't prepare?

[@FakeLootAnimations]

I'm only here for the premium

[@voronmatt4748]

great game

[@D9fjg]

​@@bryanst.martin7134 So are you saying we shouldn't enjoy our lives in our free time and slave away all of it? Then what, once you're in your death bed you regret everything because you never had joy?

[@cruisinguy6024]

The first aircraft launched is actually the rescue helo; there’s one in the air anyway time flight operations are underway *just in case*

[@manifestman132]

A rent E2 also in the air?

[@BogeyTheBear]

In the old days they might have used a destroyer to serve as the plane guard, but pilots much prefer having a helicopter rescue them after a crash than a destroyer accidentally running over them during a rescue.

[@douglasseely8137]

the first aircraft to be launched is actually the search and rescue helicopters incase a jet or other aircraft have a malfunction during take off we already have a crew in the air ready to pick up the downed aircrew.

[@bostonrailfan2427]

and it’s the last to land for that very reason but unless I’m mistaken isn’t airborne the entire time the planes are away

[@ET_Don]

I believe the first jet to launch and last jet to land are the refueling jets?

[@bricefleckenstein9666]

@@ET_Don In most operations, the first to launch is one or two SAR helo(s). They'll commonly land when launch operations are complete, then relaunch shortly before landing operations start. I doubt that's changed since I served on Ranger (and would sometimes watch flight ops from right outside my work area on the O-10 level).

[@ET_Don]

@@bricefleckenstein9666 I know, I was just expanding on what the OP Douglas said about helos launching first. I was saying the first Jets to launch and last to recover are the tankers, I believe.

[@WeaponTheory-j5h]

B2 need a aircraft ?

[@anml1969]

Fun fact: when a plane is assigned to a carrier, once it lands for the first time, the air chief goes down to the plane and signs his or her name somewhere on the fuselage together with the registration number of the carrier. Each time a plane is reassigned to a new carrier, the new air chief does the same. So some planes have three, four or more signatures and ship numbers written on them.

[@themuffinturret]

4:40 i knew them aussies were up to something

[@NeutronSplitter]

I remember hearing about that. People were getting butthurt that the US got defeated by the Aussie's. I look at it another way though. They managed to penetrate (Giggity) the largest and most sophisticated military in the world, which makes me very happy they're our friends. If they can do that to the US imagine what they can do to our adversaries.

[@slidey1788]

Check their pockets for sandpaper

[@captain_wolfsbane6468]

@@slidey1788 thats a low blow mate :)

[@slidey1788]

@@captain_wolfsbane6468 as low as an underarm delivery? 😜

[@b1646717]

4:11 lift generated by hope and willpower.

[@Ed_Stuckey]

A butt-pucker moment for sure.

[@GordonFreeman-sl6pi]

Such an impressive near mishap. The cool thing with props is that the spooling time (time it takes for the engine to reach full power) can be close to inexistant, pilots can change the angle of the propeller's blades to decrease thrust while having full power. So in case of emergency, switching the angle of the blades can provide immediate increase of thrust. Add to that the fact that unlike jets, the props are blowing air right onto the wing, helping generate immediate lift. That's why they don't have to land with full power as opposed to jets, they have a little bit more room for error.

[@Duvstep910]

RIP to the 2 growler pilots who lost their lives recently

[@LordOceanus]

Not exactly a super exciting fact but the radar the video shows when he mentions the AN/SPY-1 at 1:40 is the AN/SPS-48 which is a much older (but repeatedly upgraded) E/F Band 3D air search radar. If you jump a second back to 1:39 the parabolic radar dish on the secondary (aft) tower is the AN/SPS-49 which is an L band 2D air search radar. Those two radars work together to provide area air surveillance to the carrier. The Radar at the top of the main mast (though not the very small one at the very very top) is the AN/SPQ-9B which is the guidance radar for the carrier's onboard RIM-162 surface to air missiles.

[@brodzilla623fordawin4]

Very cool

[@kg-Whatthehelliseventhat]

Hey do you play warthunder? 😂

[@LordOceanus]

@@kg-Whatthehelliseventhat nah got tired of the increasing presence of Chinese hackers.

[@roblowery3188]

Dude, your videos need to be studied by all other military journalists and content creators. In a KZbin full of trash videos slapped together by some bootleg AI, your videos stand out as the gold standard for entertaining, concise, and factually accurate presentations. Keep it up man!

[@kenricnarbrough8191]

plus that accent, its too good

[@alexv3357]

The F-35C's efficient engine, extended wings, 20,000lbs of fuel (more than the entire max takeoff weight of an AV-8B Harrier), and the ultra low-drag internal weapons bay give it an effective combat radius of nearly 700 nautical miles on internal fuel alone

[@andrewkruchoski7757]

way she goes...

[@Quicksilver1936]

That's still not a huge combat radius though.

[@alexv3357]

@@Quicksilver1936 It's a vast improvement over the Super Hornet, though, and the best of any carrier-capable fighter with external weapons and tanks (and indeed better than almost all 4th-gen fighters period), including the F-14's famously good legs

[@thxee182]

@@alexv3357 im sorry i have to disagree with you on that. the only thing the f-35 has over 4 gen is stealth and that is it. nothing more or less. the nave was given the chance to get the f-22 for there jets but they said no. i never liked the f-35. dumped so much money to get what a knocked off f-22 with vtol. how about we look at we have and improve it. not build something new. all jets need to have a built in gun. not including the f-111 or the f-117 they are bombers not fighters.

[@MillionFoul]

@@thxee182 And here I was thinking Pierre Sprey was dead, not shitposting on KZbin! Fat Amy quite literally kicks the shit out of every fourth gen in the inventory, and your garbage opinion isn't gonna keep us from buying nearly 3,000 of them for that very reason.

[@lotharhasek3673]

"Aber wenn sie ein Flacherdler sind,ist es schwer zu glauben". Das war sehr gut.

[@MattNanneyPhoto]

It's always much appreciated to get the answer or general point in the first minute or so and not hidden later like most channels. Didn't have time to watch the whole thing right now but usually do, love the channel!

[@ReasonableGuy-l7o]

11:00 I'm a retired Navy Supply Officer and I did a tour on an old CV. The thing that drove us nuts was when our cargo and mail got bumped by "Distinguished Visitors" or DV's. I get it, PR is an important thing but it just got carried away. * Deep breath* ...but I'm over it now. * twitch twitch*

[@Anon54387]

Do they really let people order Amazon packages aboard ship? It seems space would be really limited.

[@ReasonableGuy-l7o]

@@Anon54387 Yes. It's like getting the mail. I mean, within reason. There is limited storage space for the average sailor. I was a Supply Officer so I suppose if I bought a sea kayak or something I could have stashed it in one of the storerooms. Also on a long deployment there's a lot of shopping going on when they hit a foreign port. To sum up, I would say on a large ship like an aircraft carrier there's probably more Amazon shopping than on a small boy like a destroyer.

[@Derangedforsure]

I saw a bunch of old footage recently that showed how dropping bombs and rockets off of fighters isn’t the easiest thing to do. In the early days, they tended the rise back up into the plane

[@bryanst.martin7134]

The Navy is a dangerous place. The aircraft carrier deckmate's life expectancy in war tempo is about 90 days. And we been doin this 100 years. Lot's of "Lessons Learned".

[@HenriqueChaluco]

🙏

[@ignaciomoreno9655]

World War 2 Tempo or Today War? Because I don't think that there are a lot of things that can sink a modern aircraft.

[@hifinsword]

At the 2:05 mark, the Hawkeye can see over 200 miles away, all the way to the GROUND surface. Surface ships cannot see beyond about 30 miles to the surface. The E-2 airborne search is about seeing inbound LOW-FLYING threats. Ships can see high-flying threats with their radars down to the radar horizon.

[@johnbianchi6430]

When I flew the P-3, we routinely shut down two engines (#1 and #4) when on long reconnaisance missions.

[@護国茶]

とても良い動画なのですが、日本語の翻訳の間違えだらけなので、チェックしてもらうと良いかも

[@kg-Whatthehelliseventhat]

Do you live in Japan? I live in Kanazawa.

[@C4_EVER]

두유리브인재팬?

[@Scott-j8m]

I’m always SO very fascinated by the content on this channel! This is in my top ten favorites list! Always interesting, informative, and satisfyingly uncomplicated. Just straight and simple. Really like the jokes, man! Keep ‘em coming. 😅

[@عبدالله-ك9ر2ي]

Thank you for adding Arabic voice translation 🤍 Following you from Saudi Arabia 🇸🇦🇸🇦

[@gustavoraffo489]

Cool, navy versions are awesome. Good job as always, Not What You Think!

[@davekisor1486]

The first launch of the day is the helicopter. We called them helos, not choppers. In its rescue capacity it's referred to Angel. I wasan Aviation Electrician, carrier airwing light attack.

[@graphitegamez605]

Nah not war thunder 😭😭 i am already addicted!

[@Green_Gamer23]

real

[@Michael-j6s]

Same

[@donlalonde]

The FIRST aircraft is a helicopter for "plane guard" duty...It posts itself a few miles off the starboard beam...In case of a man overboard or downed aircraft, it's close by.

[@Science4Real]

From the E2 Hawkeye to the F35C, each has a unique role in protecting and enhancing the strength of the entire carrier group

[@krystalmae5557]

Next video idea, "all types of ground vehicles explained" or "all types of aa weapons explained"

[@erasmus_locke]

It's all about fuel saving. The ship might be nuclear, but the planes are still limited to dinosaur juice.

[@dustinandtarynwolfe5540]

Reread the title of the video

[@1st2nd2]

Fun fact: "Dinosaur juice" does not contain the remains of any dinosaurs.

[@grugbug4313]

Solid! Top KEK! Peace be with you.

[@marshweber702]

The first and last to land during launch and recovery cycle is always the helo… not the Hawkeye…

[@felixhoefflin9655]

Die Faltbareb Tragflächen sind einfach, Platzersparnis. Tragflächen haben eine Mindestgröße, aus Materialerparnisgründen, weden sue knspp sn der Physikalischen Grenze gebaut. Die Meusten Flugzeuge haben trotz Katapult Probleme von einem Träger zu starten, da hilft bei einer Turboptop ein zusätzlicher Motor, fliegt das Flugzeug aber auf der Zielhöhe, braucht man den nichtmehr, er kann also abgeschaltet werden.

[@AnjanS-rp4qk]

Just behind you !

[@Travlinmo]

Submariners are quietly chuckling when you talk about these Helo’s tracking them. If we ever have a fight at sea between our boats and these targets… there is going to be a lot of dead surface warriors.

[@hifinsword]

The E-2 Hawkeye is the first FIXED wing aircraft to launch. Of course the plane guard helo is the first aircraft to launch if a ship isn't doing duty as plane guard. Yes, ships can also be plane guard and I have launched without a helo airborne as plane guard.

[@feritall]

1:49 the average person is not 🔥

[@RAPTOR-zo7gt]

i was looking for this comment. shes stunning

[@samsonsoturian6013]

The average person interested in you sure as hell isn't

[@bredsheeran2897]

@@samsonsoturian6013women are complicated :(

[@apathyzen9730]

She's looking for seamen

[@ronjon7942]

She seems a little young.

[@apacheglider]

longer wings : you should have said "to be able to be airborn with slower speeds (catapult, but also safer landing)"

[@stug77]

They should take retired older model E-2's and have them take their tops off and do COD when V-22's are grounded next. You couldn't do anything bulky but a lot of COD is packages and mail and passengers anyway, would take that load off the existing C-2 fleet.

[@AnjanS-rp4qk]

Well, they're designed for Aircraft Carrier take offs and landings, so catapults are necessary. The Sea Harriers and a few others are exceptions. Necessity is the mother of invention!

[@pablonylos8022]

Dobrze zrealizowany odcinek. Świetne napisy polskie. Dzięki. Pozdrawiam.

[@chuckguard6128]

You should do a video on how the different water bases torpedoes, air to sea harpoons, work to hit submarines. And how a destroyer or other ships fight submarines and what subs use to destroy ships and other submarine!!

[@braddblk]

I used to work on KA-6D tanker. There was a test S-3 tanker that could pass more gas than we could. With the retirement of both those aircraft and replacing them with an F/A-18 carrying a D-704 package caused a problem, the aircraft didn't have a lot of gas to share. The Navy had to rely on the Air Force tanker in the Middle East conflicts. My question is what is the fuel load of these UAV tankers and how are they controlled.

[@nicola3809]

Veramente interessante. Non sapevo che l' F-35 per la marina non avesse il cannone, come non mi sarei mai aspettato di sentire che anche su una portaaerei si consegnassero i pacchi Amazon😂😂😂

[@jimcollins3420]

Among other things, I was an E-2B IFT (In-flight Technician) on the USS Midway for three years. For the reasons specified, yes, they frequently try to get the E-2 off first but you know, stuff happens. We were last or close to it many times also.

[@scottmeredith3359]

I suspect I’m going to discover something that isn’t what I thought 🤔

[@Itower2010]

Nice video😊

[@ScoutSniper3124]

Actually, the APU provides the hot gasses needed to spin up the engine and get it running.

[@juliusrohr3647]

8:05 the comparison is made with a clean f/a-18 e/f, and a clean F-35C right? Because I think if you load up the Hornet with extra bags (it can carry up to 5) this comparison may be incorrect

[@OpinionatedComments]

the advantage of being a flat earther is that they can see 200 miles away just standing in the front yard.

[@cwf_media9200]

i couldnt look at the horizon i was distracted

[@NotWhatYouThink]

I bet whatever distracted you was round, not flat, right? 😜

[@cwf_media9200]

@NotWhatYouThink now I understand the pain of flat earthers imagine not liking those curves 🤤

[@NathanEllis-n3u]

Ikr. I couldn't dream if someone not being able to like curves.

[@slidey1788]

Men of culture, we meet again

[@MeteorMark]

@scimandan, Bob the Science Guy, Dave McKegan and MC Toon can use the example of the Hawkeye to once again prove the Earth is an Oblate Spheroid 🖖😉

[@aussiedanjones]

Can you please do an in-depth video on take off differences between land and carrier

[@NobbsAndVagene]

01:48 _... the average person standing at sea level_ (picture of 8/10 chick from BayWatch, 2024 colourized)

[@NotWhatYouThink]

8/10? You seems to have very high standards 😁

[@NobbsAndVagene]

@@NotWhatYouThink I think of 5/10 as the actual average person (if there was such a thing) and 10/10 as unattainable perfection, and much as a particle with mass can never achieve light speed, so can you never find a true 10/10, a perfect being. She is way above average, so 8/10 sounds fair enough. Doesn't it? Though I guess that depends on your type.

[@NathanEllis-n3u]

No yea she is quite the specimen

[@robertopiedimonte2078]

​​@@NobbsAndVagene this is not what you think 🤣 Yeah you are right and this is why Nadia Comaneci in 1976 got a 1.00 for her exercise. It was the first time ever a gymnastics athlete score a 10 and display was not ready with only three digits available!!! Perfection exist and is possible. It's not for everyone...

[@slarratt]

Looks OK from the back, when she turns around and she got an extra eye, or gammy teeth or a mustache... worth keeping the 2 back...

[@JPMediaProductions]

9:38 Amen to freedom! 🙏

[@KlipsenTube]

That wasn't not what I thought. It was exactly what I thought.

[@rogerthat4545]

It's not what I thought. I assumed a fighter jet was the first launched

[@Diekgraaf]

Wir haben vor kurzem auf dem Deich gestanden um uns ein Feuerwerk in Aurich anzuschauen. Das ist etwa 30 KM weit weg.

[@JP_TaVeryMuch]

11:48 Seems to me that the ingenious yet ugly Osprey replacement wins on VTOL but loses in operational range and sheer airspeed versus the C2.

[@overkill1340]

I think the Osprey has a slightly longer range than the Grayhound. Since range is usually calculated with minimal load, and the C2 payload can be heavier, the C2 is probably shorter ranged with a full payload. I'm not sure if it is significanly more than average failures, but Osprey does have an early record of failures, and without the ability to effectively glide or autorotate, they tend to be catastophic. On the other hand, the Osprey can carry the F-35s engine while the Grayhound cannot.

[@jessicacolegrove4152]

There is also the issue of the F35 when it comes to the cod aircraft. Apparently the C2 cargo hold couldn't handle the engine of the F35. Meaning that if a replacement engine was needed the C2 could not deliver hence the need for a new cod

[@richardbeckenbaugh1805]

The Osprey is a deathtrap. Still in development after years of operational deployment. The OMB says that the Osprey is the most expensive plane to operate in the entire inventory and there are many solutions that are cheaper. With the advent of cheap airborne LIDARs, the entire stealth system has become obsolete. With the Chinese supplying LIDARs to third world countries, operations even against them have become much more difficult. The U.S. banned the development of LIDARs in hopes of containing the technology, what they did instead was bankrupt a bunch of companies which the Chinese bought and obtained the technology much sooner than they would have otherwise.

[@overkill1340]

@@richardbeckenbaugh1805 LIDAR is neither new, or magical. I have LIDARS crawling all over my floor every week. Speed enforcement has been using them for years. Musk removed them from his cars a while ago to save costs. That ship has sailed. If they were the key to defeating stealth they would have been deployed en mass already and if third world countries have their hands on longer range LIDAR with stealth defeating ability, I doubt Israel would have been so successful in Iran a couple weeks ago.

[@JP_TaVeryMuch]

@richardbeckenbaugh1805 Aha. Those pesky unintended consequences again! Thank you for the info.

[@AWACSSS]

اتمنى الاستمرار في تنزيل مقاطع عن الاسلحة السوفيتية السرية وسباق التسلح

[@dtar380]

9:40, bro called weapons “freedom” 💀

[@audreyplaysnice2086]

This is so awesome! Makes me even more proud of our military.

[@audreyplaysnice2086]

Until trump hands it over to putin or starts WW3 because someone insulted his hair

[@timbrady6473]

Crazy that seamen can receive Amazon deliveries while at sea.

[@em1osmurf]

the original Navy Hummer...very familiar with it (CV-67 vet).

[@corvanphoenix]

Oi! The biggest threat to carriers isn't Aussies!

[@DavidSherman-m5l]

Just for future reference, helos are always launched first.

[@IronCreed21]

"51 seconds ago" was crazy

[@semajniomet981]

Out of curiosity, how easily would RADAR be able to detect a (Fairey) Swordfish?

[@JP_TaVeryMuch]

10:44 [sniggers like a schoolboy] Growler and Penetrate in the same sentence. Ahh the joys of two countries separated by a common language! Growler is slang for sthg completely different is all I'll say.

[@thegeneralist7527]

Learn something every day.

[@wdygoaphagfy]

Why when you are talking about the Firehawk drone at 14:17 do yo show a picture of a Bell OH-58 Kiowa?

[@Dellvmnyam]

Do you mean the planes launched from carriers in the first half of the 20th century are still in the air because they were the first launched from carriers and will be landed the last?

[@NotWhatYouThink]

🤓

[@JanPhilippWeber-kb6gt]

Hawkeye wird als erstes gestartet damit anderen Flugzeug ein Verbindung haben zum Flugzeugträger.

[@LeodiAstoriaXIII]

I kept rewinding the 1:50 mark because I couldn't believe it either.

[@fueronporquetenianelsaturn9632]

El primer avion obviamente que es uno del grupo de Grumman E-2D Hawkeyes que llevan radar de larga distancia (AWACS). Solo cuando este volando uno de ellos, ese se sabrá los aviones amigos y enemigos que estan en un radio de quiza mas de 450 Km (informacion secreta). La cobertura aerea solo se recoje cuando los Hawkeyes no vean intrusos

[@vitr1916]

Is it possible a guided pathway of small drones to help aircraft landing in bad conditions? Like you see them in New Year events.

[@cruddybanz410]

of course the higher you go the further you can see , the horizon will still come to eye level … earth is a level plane surrounded by water

[@restaurantattheendofthegalaxy]

🙄

[@carlsoll]

8:08 That’s so fast :o too fast to comprehend and he’s like shaking the whole time O.O

[@DJ-gs8ly]

Removing the gun was a bad idea.. same thing happened to the phantom during Vietnam ..

[@verdebusterAP]

If Saab was smart, they would be working a carrier variant of the Globaleye

[@F14foreverF14]

FLY NAVY ⚓

[@slarratt]

Signature move?

[@stu176mmm]

1:50 definitely NOT average ❤

[@pawetomczak631]

Bełkot: dluzsze skrzydła zwiększają ciąg...

[@frendB0B]

great vid

[@PhantomofPhreedom]

1:02 no wonder why f-35s on a aircraft carrier looked funny

[@OliwierKnetka]

I LOVE WAR THUNDER ♥♥

[@bryanst.martin7134]

Wait, you didn't cover the UCAV. Actually used in an offensive role back a few years ago.

[@FinlayDaG33k]

11:09 that's one familiar mustache...

[@G80G70]

4:15 저승 문턱까지 갔어ㅆ네. ㅎㄷㄷ

[@corvanphoenix]

I want the RAAF to get some Stingray MQ-25's.

[@andrealettich]

But are the Boa sonars that are launched recovered afterwards?

[@senorporko3299]

I cant escape the snail

[@TheKrystiano91]

Uummm... how is it that all of the sudden you are speaking in polish to me ? 😂 I know, I know, it is AI translation but man it is first time I encountered thos on KZbin. This is so weird because it is your voice no doubt... yet in my native language... like this is so bizzare 😅

[@NotWhatYouThink]

Hehe yep! The power of AI. Curious, how was the polish voice? (Translation, etc).

[@JP_TaVeryMuch]

​@@NotWhatYouThinkNot as polished as it could have been‽

[@TheKrystiano91]

@@NotWhatYouThink I have to say it is decent, you can understand everything, there were maybe a copule of small hickups where it translated certen words a bit strange, but overall it is nice it didn't substract from the expearience. So yeah still needs a bit of polishing 😉 The weirdest thing is, that in a way it sounded very realistic, literally in terms of acent, as if You as English speaker really learned the script in Polish and read it as well as possible. But have to say it did very well with all our weird sounds that we make like : Ś Ć Ż Ą Ę Ł SZ CZ.

[@michael_083]

My first thought was … parking 😂

[@Joe-bm4wx]

The Hawkeye is NOT the first to launch. The first to launch and last to recover is the MH-60S.

[@lukmanalghdamsi3189]

why the f18 in the thumbnail doesn't have a tail wings, back wings or whatever it called?

[@MKdross]

18,000# is a lot of freedom!

[@joeprov1]

f35 gun pod??? i didt know it had one

[@medasculomoreyra]

Cuando nos vamos...

[@PvtPartzz]

Does the F35 still have a greater range than the f/a18 when the latter has external fuel tanks?

[@griffinfaulkner3514]

No, but it can also carry external tanks if required, and the F-22 upgrade program is developing stealthy tanks that should carry over to the F-35. Even without those stealthy tanks, the F-35 still has a massive sensor and ECM advantage over every Hornet variant other than the Growler.

[@JP_TaVeryMuch]

2:48 Not a conspiratorial chap, I, nevertheless the top two reasons to still keep the E-2 Hawkeye up in the sky in this day and age of multi faceted military observation capabilities are either: Jobs for the boys or The long standing tradition of failsafe measures so that in this case, if the carrier can't tap in to the vast array of satellite &c. spying options, it will always have its own eye in the sky battlefield overview service as provided by this plane.

[@breadcan]

Satellites move at extreme speed an on fixed, predictable tracks. They can't 'hover' over a fleet. An airborne surveillance RADAR provides instant, flexible coverage of an area of interest. If a carrier group is targeted with a barrage of anti-ship missiles, it needs to know about them seconds after launch, and the best a satellite could do could be several hours. That's not to say that a carrier group doesn't use information from satellites. An E-2 can surveil a large area in a few areas, but it's nothing compared to what a satellite will sweep in the same time. A satellite can't maintain continuous coverage of an enemy fleet, but it can tell you where they were, and that's enough to tell an E-2 where to search. Modern information gathering is layered, with assets that can sweep huge areas but provide limited detail are used to direct assets with limited scope but provide great detail.

[@ParoXyzmm]

I don't quite think you realise the gap between satellites and AWACS. Satellites will net you a good idea of any large surface contacts over a whole ocean (I.e. ships), sure. But good luck trying to get a satellite to optically track a jet or missile, let alone somehow get a centimeter accuracy track on such an object. This is also assuming you have a satellite above literally every point on the planet, meaning you would need hundreds to thousands of them.

[@markomenalan]

9:42 this guy on the left: 👉👈🥺

[@ernestgalvan9037]

Wheel Chocks ‘in’ Opposite, with thumbs pointed out: Wheel Chocks ‘out’

[@LunaryxDiarmait]

If the controls for aircraft in War Thunder is improved, I might play it, but I don't like it how it is now.

[@Wormweed]

1:49 that's quite the average person, indeed.

[@jeepdude7359]

What horizon? 1:49