Novosibirsk-Mochishe Airshow 31.July.2011

i have captured beautiful video of russian vintage aircrafts flying at novosibirsk-mochishe airshow. there are antonov an-2, polikarpov i-16 and mikoyan mig-3.
too bad i haven't recorded low altitude paradrop from an an-2. it would be a great addition to this video.

[@rafanj824]

The i-16 seems to be so much fun, small and open cockpit!!! But the star is the MiG 3, what a look and what a sound, beautiful!!!

[@user-kk5jn9ko8q]

Благодарю от всей души, ребят которые восстановили эти легендарные истребители до летного состояния !!!

[@christopheschwartz7374]

La plus belle musique que j' adore entendre c' est le 9 Cylindres de ce splendide Polikarpov I-16, mon préféré! Bien sur le légendaire Mig-3 tout comme l' Antonov An-2!!! Bol'shoye Spasibo pour ce partage

[@strizhi]

Now that the Russians have I-153, I-16, Yak-3/9 and MiG-3's flying up again. Its time for them to put together a Lagg-3 and La-5fn back to flying status. Also Il-4 medium bomber would be the icing on the cake and God forbid if I ever get to see a Pe-8 heavy bomber in my lifetime :D

[@muravievod]

War thunder top

[@alyciamarrison2916]

The last plane sound quite similar to a Merlin engined spitfire! Great video as there seems so few videos of wonderfull Russiian aircraft.

[@luchoudremont]

I-16 : I’m a Killing Machine !!! Me: Awww that’s cute ❤️😂

[@alessandrojosue656]

I know im asking randomly but does any of you know a trick to log back into an instagram account?? I somehow lost the password. I would appreciate any tips you can offer me

[@adrienalex7262]

@Alessandro Josue Instablaster :)

[@strenggeheim6672]

Ja, für den Piloten der sie flog.

[@strenggeheim6672]

Ich staune immer wieder wie viele I-16 es noch gibt. Was unsere Luftwaffe von denen in die Erde geschickt hat. Die AN-2 ist eines der schönsten Flugzeuge. Überhaupt die russischen Flugzeuge. Aber auch unsere sehen schön aus.

[@LarS1963]

It did very well in Spain, but was getting obsolete in -41.

[@user-ej3fs4xm4p]

Богом Вас прошу.!!!воссоздайте Нашу поршневую авиацию времен СССР.!!!!

[@ERK191]

Вы возможно не в курсе событий. Практически все самолёты, восстановленные из обломков, проданы за рубеж. Эта новосибирская группа зарабатывет деньги на памяти наших лёчиков, на их крови. Там нет бога.

[@user-ir1wk2dc2i]

@@ERK191 Вы возможно не в курсе событий, все работы по реставрации оплачивают буржуи, поскольку СибНИИА, где их восстанавливают сам с трудом выживает. Облетывает самолеты директор института.

[@Kaketobilo]

МиГ-3 шикарен И-16 просто прелесть Ан-2 - наше всё

[@CESSNATURBO]

Подписываюсь под каждым словом)))

[@user-nk6pm4ke7h]

воистину

[@user-wg1yi8uk8r]

Не могу не выпендриться - И-16 и Ан-2 кровные братья, у них один двигатель

[@Spawn-td8bf]

Love that Polikarpov I16. Thanks for posting. God Bless

[@dwb345]

Mig 3 wow I never thought I would see one fly today

[@finntastique3891]

Cool that someone takes the trouble to keep these great planes airworthy. Best find on KZbin today, thanks!

[@vintagesurvivor]

Nice to see the love of aviation crosses all borders :)

[@MrJoch731]

Nice war birds..rare. Thanx for the video.

[@craigpennington1251]

The i16 would be a hoot to fly.Love it very much.

[@eddcla7766]

Wonderful, I had no idea any of these were flying! Apparently there are 3, all utilising Allison V12s. I would love to see one sometime, the MIg-3 is one of the most beautiful aircraft ever made. It looks like it's going 400mph sat still, and that is a hell of a roll rate.

[@utuberlesmouches]

Magnifique présentation, bravo !

[@whoisthat2964]

I saw Yak 9 in Air show at Travis AFB, it was found by accident in some old factory all disassembled. So it got assembled with the original parts, made in wartime. Its all red in color, so I believe there are more birds with original engines out there

[@user-uo8px3tf5h]

Был бы Александр Иванович живой,порадовался бы(про МиГ-3)

[@alphasirius8058]

Миг-3 Превосходил в свое время Мессера по всем параметрам! Высотный перехватчик убийца..Красота.

[@susanbutler2498]

Flew in New Zealand's Yak3M at Hood Aerodrome 2 months ago.......STILL buzzing about it! Also, how did I not know about an airworthy Mig-3?!!! PS it was us Kiwi's that got all the i-16's Rebuilt.......You're Welcome World.

[@FiveCentsPlease]

+ Susan Butler There are three restored Mig-3s, all completed in Russia with Allison V12 engines. (Checking on #3 because I think the Russians were trying to put an original Mikulin V12 in it, unsuccessfully if I recall.)

[@eriklapparent4662]

So much things to see in your country !Let's pray for peace and normal relations with a beautiful people!

[@P61guy61]

Thank you for posting

[@todaywefly4370]

Ahhh! Those Russians. Unique styling based on practicalities.

[@felarfurlong]

yes, feel free to use this video as you see fit. i've listed it under creative commons licence.

[@95thFoot]

Thank you very much! These are three very historic airplanes. I want to visit Russia someday, and perhaps attend such airshows.

[@alzl9026]

AN-2 at the start of vid. The moust impressive thing is that it creator Antonov were largelly crityciced for it development - and it is flying now with almous 70 years of service.

[@Irvine7214x6apc]

Excellent video of some great, rare warbirds.

[@paladin56]

I didn't know there was an airworthy Mig-3. Thanks for posting. It has agreat rate of roll.

[@Mr_Twister77]

This is not a replicas, it is the aircrafts restored in Novosibirsk, about which a movie filmed in high definition, a link to one series of which I have left above. When testers flew on this MiG-3, they were greatly surprised by its excellent handling, in all historical documents say that the MiG-3 did not have a good handling at low altitudes (this plane is designed as a high-altitude interceptor)! It was the fastest fighter in the beginning of the 2nd World War, at the height of its speed exceeded 600 km / h

[@paladin56]

They have done a beautiful job on the restoration. I hope one day we will see an La-5 or La-7 in the sky again. there seem to be very few survivors of Lavotchkin's aircraft.

[@localsheriff]

Since you seem to know something about these birds; do you know whether the Mig-3 in the clip still sports its original engine or is it converted to Merlin as most ex-Soviet fighters are these days?

[@jackfuller8960]

localsheriff 1977 It's got an Allison I'm pretty sure. Most Soviet fighters nowdays use allisons not Merlins.

[@dyer2cycle]

Wow...an airworthy MiG-3! I have seen Yak-3/9's with Allison engines before, they are great performers. I-16's are neat. The engines in the I-16's sound a lot like Wright R-1820 Cyclone.

[@user-vo8bl2zr6l]

It's rather funny, but I-16's engine sounds like this, because its engine is Wright R-1820 Cyclone, made in ussr by license, and called M-25.

[@Psycho_Odessit]

@@user-vo8bl2zr6l ну у нас их сильно модифицировали

[@MrSteeleye]

Nicknamed the Noddy plane with attitude

[@BablchLife]

MiG-3 is the high-speed and high-rise in the world of combat interceptor in 1940. Миг-3 - самый скоростной и высотный в мире боевой перехватчик в 1940 году.

[@MrVink68]

Yes, Allison one. But the whole frame original. The craft belonged to Alekseev fighter pilot of 122 fighter regiment shot down in 1941 .

[@dugwolfe]

what a weird collection of beautiful aircraft. my fave is the I2 stormovic. want one: and yes i can fly. plane and helicopter!

[@174NiTRO174]

Спасибо за видео

[@user-fq3vx4dr7v]

Есть ещё настоящие пилоты!

[@Irvine7214x6apc]

Yes, it has an Allison V-1710 engine, V-12.

[@charlesvillebrun536]

that first plane kinda reminds me of the otter that we used in the north of canada a lot .. it was a very dependable plane .. you could trust that it would take you where ever you wanted to go in the north .. winter or summer .. very tough plane ..

[@user-jy2xd7kr1u]

Красота

[@zeogiannes]

Love those piston engine aircraft! Thank you for the great video!

[@BasicModelling]

Thank you very much.. Much appreciated!! :) :)

[@garynew9637]

Love the music!

[@strizhi]

Yes thank you...not many made and under circumstances of their mission I'm surprised not more were destroyed. It wasn't the best bomber of the war but its a unique one that hardly many know about and it was Russia's attempt at creating their own first real long range bomber in similar dimension if not larger then the B-17. WW2 was Russia's lesson of total warfare and its because of it that Russia is a superpower today!

[@davidflorek2165]

What plane do you mean ? Both Mig and Polikarpov were frontline fighters, and the AN-2 was designed after the War as a multifunctional airplane but not as bomber.

[@user-rn6xv3cw8k]

И 16 круче ВСЕХ конечно же! От ДУШИ говорю ! Прям птичька!

[@matthewkabanuk443]

Beautiful sounding Mikulin AM-35A

[@user-eg4xh4hb8b]

It is not Mikulin. Allison.

[@user-ey3pu6vp3o]

Крылатые красавцы!

[@venzel-px8dy]

Спасибо 👍

[@damadyko533]

Очень редко можно увидеть в работе...

[@ccc771]

the chap flying the polikarpov i-16 gets hero points for balls ... just look at that speed on landing ... like woow

[@EnterpriseXI]

I sure that Mig-3 is running a Allison engine instead of the original Mikulin AM-35 V-12.

[@felarfurlong]

@mendacha , i heard it has some usa made engine, not the original one.

[@user-xx3yb6tv9v]

привет из новосибирска

[@neilfoster814]

The Mig-3 was as good, if not better than many western WW2 fighter aircraft. Luftwaffe pilots were told to treat this fighter with a great deal of respect in combat, many did not and ended up paying the price!

[@mendacha]

@felarfurlong probably Allison like in the P40s and early Mustangs

[@ekibarthenid]

If only they had lengthened the fuselage on the Mig-3, how different things would be.

[@FiveCentsPlease]

It would sound like a T-28 because the Shvetsov engines were based on the Wright 1820, or these restorations could be using Wright 1820 engines also.

[@mendacha]

I wonder if the mig has an original Mikulin engine..

[@felarfurlong]

@DauntlessAviation check antonov's history. his bureau was transferred to ukraine from novosibisk in 1952. an-2 maiden was in 1947.

[@user-uo8px3tf5h]

Интересно,И-16 и МиГ-3 еще когда нибудь летали?За 8 лет больше их не видел.

[@BasicModelling]

Great video, it looked like a good airshow... :) :) I'm a modeller and am working on a MiG-3 right now, and hope to build an An-2 later on, and I was wondering if I may use parts of this video to illustrate the REAL aircraft flying and moving in the air, as part of my building reviews?? You will be given FULL CREDIT, of'course, with your channel name on the video clip and a link to your channel in the description. Thanks in advane and hoping for a positive reply.. Rob / BasicModelling

[@redemissarium]

even the shape say 'speed!'. It was the fastest high altitude plane in its day, faster than bf109 and spit, but germany go low where it mig-3 is ineffective

[@user-ct4bh7ud5l]

Миг 3 был высотный истребитель _ перехватчик и показывал хорошие результаты на высоте от 3 тысяч метров.а фашисты на ме-109 проводили бои от 1000 до 3000 м.где миг уступал.

[@ulanarni8804]

A real Woman, an oldschool Harley and the I 16; that´s all what you need.

[@dannyschulznorge]

Goode one! cheers

[@johnfrancis2215]

Looks a formidable fighter, did the famous Ivan kozhedub fly these mig 3s

[@MegaTatatatira]

No.. Kozedud flyed La-5fn

[@balrogdrums]

wow.. would love to see a mig 3 flying in germany

[@rogercamp2910]

The MIG 3 looks like a spitfire fuselage with a hurricane wing. The growl of the Merlin is undisguisable.

[@adamweaver1594]

Seems Russia has maintained a good collocation of vintage warbirds and thats really cool.

[@lightsaberlordp373]

Not as good as the Germans!!!

[@robertsturgeon8218]

The Mig 3 looks like a close copy of an Italian fighter La Mama Mia or something like that.

[@TheBlitzJager]

Probably an Allison, like most Yak warbirds have. Certainly sounds like one

[@Bruno47602]

Hi!It`s certainly a clench.

[@tracker1673]

Poor I-16 was born with no dihedral! Seems to have grown out of it though. It sounds like it's stomping its feet on the flyby!

[@32132187]

миг не самый лучший по ттх, но самый красивый капот как у гоночного авто - длиннный мотор от бомбера

[@Psycho_Odessit]

были экспериментальные самолёты на его базе с 2000 сильным АМ-42, они разгонялись до 730

[@user-px9kh1rv5v]

МИГ красавчик,с детства запал в душу

[@jpatt1000]

I was fortunate to see an I-16 display at EAA. Would love to see the MiG-3! What is it using for an engine? An original, or was it converted to Allison or Rolls Royce power. I know the Il-2 flying here was converted because parts for the original engine are hard to come by.

[@user-eg4xh4hb8b]

MiG powered by Allison

[@jpatt1000]

Were the original engines Klimovs? Doesn't really matter what is in it though, the big V-12s all sound great! I wonder if any of the original engines are still capable of being run. I'm surprised there are two Bf-109s flying with the D-B engines. Those must also be next to impossible to find parts for.

[@Lemard77]

The original engines for both the MiG and IL-2 were Mikulins, AM 35 and AM 38 respectively, more powerful than Klimov ones

[@MHG1023]

AFAIK the Mikulin engines were not very reliable and had temperature/cooling problems. So, I guess those who restored the airframes decided to play "safe". But OTOH it might be difficult to get hold of any Mikulin engine anyway. Don´t think there are many complete or "almost complete" suitable left for airworthy restoration ...

[@KeepSpamUnderControl]

1:22 that airplane is awesome lol

[@jeancarton1611]

those planes have a huge landing speed....

[@dogbiscuit1649]

I-16's had no flaps so yeah, they were still going like crazy when landing. One of my favourite planes ever. Good vid. :0)

[@usmc2141ilya]

The i-16 was the first plastic model plane I ever built. Very cool looking airplane, bit out dated to fight the bf-109 but still a cool plane for its time.

[@user-ec9zn5uk8g]

супер zer gut

[@Norberg_West]

Класс.

[@user-km4ns6ff5g]

Миг-3 это реально аппарат

[@jola441605]

Поддержу АНку(стоит в п.Луговой Моск обл.по случаю люблю побродить рядом)Насчёт МИГа и сейчас лежит на шкашфу в виде модели.сложная машина так и не могу поднять.Хочет скорость при взлёте и хорошую полосу.не реклама Дмитров кто и где летает

[@user-go3hz2rf8w]

Спасибо за работу! "Миг-3", это высотный истребитель. Его рабочая высота от 2 700 метров, где ему не было равных. Это перехватчик. Нерадивые командиры истребительных полков, посылали работать в нижние эшелоны. А нерадивые лётчики и там, на высоте, гробили машины. А те, кто побеждал не страхом, а умением, побеждали и на малых высотах. Благодаря Покрышкину, разработавшему тактику ведения воздушного боя и проведения наземных операций с применением взаимодействия авиации между собой на всех эшелонах высот, и благодаря другим Героям Советского Союза, в том числе других родов войск, была показана возможность бить врага в любых условиях, чем они и заслужили звание Героев. Малодушие и вредительство, как и выход из боя после отстрела боезапаса, стало более заметным остальным лётчикам, которые освободились из под влияния трусов в полках. И так везде. Поэтому позже страна предала своих Героев и стали почитать всех погибших и военнопленных не сбежавших из плена, называя их всех героями. А в бою погибает неумеха, как и в жизни, доказывая своими глупыми смертями, что товарищества нет и быть не может, как не может быть Суворовского принципа побеждать. Своими гибелями ещё и делали неадекватными остальных воинов. А что с народом сейчас происходит и не говорите. На "И-16"("Ишачок") лётчики летали и кто умел побеждать, потом говорили, что самолёт этот, кто освоил, он потом мог летать на любом легко, мол те, кто утверждает противоположное, они трусы. "И-16" немцы во время Войны прозвали "Rata"(крыса) за его маневренность. Факт такой, что налёт у немецких пилотов перед первым боевым выходом был не менее 270 часов налёта в тренировках. А у Советских лётчиков иногда не состовлял и 3 часов в первый год войны. Однако били фашиста и в хвост, и в гриву. Значит было нечто иное, другое знание, которое давали во время Сталина. Это понимание и предают периодически люди в себе. Это понимание закономерностей законов Вселенной по имени Совесть.

[@yahatinda]

YOU HAVE TO LIKE THE "RAT"

[@mrOL100]

In Russia it was called "ishachok" - little donkey

[@user-wk6zj9th7l]

Сам ты КРЫСА! Это Ишачек, или Ястребок!!!

[@user-vo8bl2zr6l]

@@user-wk6zj9th7l ну так-то он прав, немцы его крысой называли.

[@user-wk6zj9th7l]

@@user-vo8bl2zr6l спасибо за столь ценные сведения, жизнь прожил в авиации, не знал! 😁 😃 😃

[@user-vo8bl2zr6l]

@@user-wk6zj9th7l я знаю, что вы знаете, я не понял, зачем вы так резко высказались на слова Рея Хансена.

[@lfztech]

sounds like the mig is flying with a merlin engine in it

[@Mocking69]

プロペラ戦闘機に乗って空を飛んでみたいです=3

[@Inferalanding]

The I-16 sounds like a T-28.

[@tyomikshkolnik7988]

Me born in Novosibirsk

[@user-on4qd3yh8r]

Очень мало самолётов.

[@johncarey4186]

Almost same body style as P-51 Mustang

[@user-yc5bh6rd6s]

mig-3 is older

[@lightsaberlordp373]

@@user-yc5bh6rd6s Nyet comrade, We do not trust capitalist pigs to copy allied planes from the west!!!

[@arturasstatkus8613]

Mig 3 yes,but with Super Merlin,,engine!

[@FiveCentsPlease]

+ Arturas Statkus Allison engine.

[@user-ld7zc6zu6c]

Обидно, что нашу историю сохраняют(в частности самолёты) в основном сохраняют иностранцы, а не мы. Ибо в России днём с огнём не сыщешь летающий самолёт времён ВОВ, а если и найдёшь, то их количество по пальцам сощитать на всю страну.

[@user-xk2lb2ob8p]

У И-16 брутальный такой звук мотора.

[@Psycho_Odessit]

как у харлея, впрочем у них конструкция двигателей схожа

[@user-ef1sp5uc9j]

Это особенности записи на микрофон цифровой камеры.

[@user-xk2lb2ob8p]

@@user-ef1sp5uc9j Микрофон передает звук правильно.

[@Bruno47602]

O`Friend!Pe8 made 80-90 mashins.Dead 40-70

[@wolfganggugelweith8760]

Chachacha 😄! Russkiii Aeroplano gutttt! Nastrowje! Chachacha 🥳😄😸!

[@Lukas-nj9hf]

Ишак Мишу по всем параметрам уступает. А в игре ил2 наоборот как бешенная табуретка крутится.

[@tomjohn3879]

Politics aside, I really do like the looks and sounds of that Mig and I-16. Its a shame the government they had behind them was equally as tyrannical as the one they were fighting against.

[@wezmarauder2754]

Tom John "shame the government they had behind them was equally as tyrannical as the one they were fighting against." Equally tyrannical? Not even close. Let's let the *Jews* decide which was worse, and the Ukrainians and most of the people in what later became Eastern Europe. While Stalin certainly was paranoid people died because the system itself was inefficient and a lot of peasants became superfluous when they introduced tractors and other farming machines. If you played a charade and said:"Hurray for Stalin!" they'd let you live. Stalin also wisely focused all efforts on arms manufacturing because he knew they lagged far behind Nazi Germany and if they would be invaded they'd have no arms with which to defend themselves effectively. Hitler himself admitted to the Finnish marshall Mannerheim (and this secret recording by the Finns still exists) on the latter's 75th birthday in 1942 that he (Hitler) had no idea how much arms and arms manufacturing capability the Soviets had. The Nazis did indeed rely on outdated information. So as despicable as Stalin was he did save his own people. The bottom line is that as hated as he was by the people they at least had a chance for a life with him. Play the charade and hope the old man croaks. With the Nazis you couldn't play any charade no matter how much you kissed up to them. Ask the Jews - who tried to play it for a while thinking they would be spared. Their very ideology was based on racial biology and how superior people had the right to defeat and exterminate "inferior people". Eugenics was taken to the extreme in Nazi Germany. Look up Lebensplan Ost, which is what the Nazis had in mind for the Poles, Russians, Ukrainians and other "eastern people" once the war was over. Planned genocide on a scale which would have dwarfed the holocaust of Jews. The Nazis had no peer there in all history. They sat down at Wannsee in 1942 and discussed how to exterminate the Jews most efficiently, what logistics were required and how it could be done on an industrial scale. Organised extermination as a result of their ideology. Prior to the war their extremely thorough registration of Jews and part-Jews was unprecedented. The Ukrainians had suffered through the starvation which was due to inefficient collectivization, years of bad harvests and a focus on industrial growth. The workers got what was produced and the peasants got next to nothing. Pure prioritization. Harsh but necassary. So when the Nazis invaded in 1941 the Ukrainians first greeted them as liberators. They quickly learned that the Nazis too needed their grain and other natural resources and they weren't going to ask nicely for permission. Ukrainians were also classified as "eastern people" and as such were marginally above Jews in Nazi propaganda. As for the Jews, the Ukraine had the largest number of Jews after Poland in WW2. Needless to say whoever was part Jew or married to a Jew or friends with Jews or housed Jews were given the same treatment as if they were Jews themselves. So the Ukranians fought for Stalin because at least they had a chance with him, with Hitler they were seen as "mongols" or people indoctrinated with a "Jewish mentality." Uncle Joe did the lion's share in WW2. 80% of all German casualties were on the Eastern Front. Most of their tanks, heavy guns, trucks and logistics were destroyed there. At D-day there were 60 German divisions in France, compared to over 230 German divisions tied up on the Eastern Front. Needless to say an invasion of France would have been impossible without most of the Germans tied up in the East. By this time Nazi Germany had already been on the retreat for over a year and driven back to the borders of Poland. When Romania was invaded in 1944 and switched sides Nazi Germany lost their last source of oil (the Romanian oil fields at Ploesti) and also their most numerous ally in Europe after Italy (which already had surrendered in 1943). The reality is that the western allies needed one dictator to defeat another and they went for the least bad one. Prior to the war Harry S. Truman said:"If Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union go to war it's beneficial to us but if I'd were to pick a winner I sincerily hope it's not Nazi Germany, they mustn't be allowed to win." The first American Lend-Lease to the USSR was signed in March 11th 1941, which was over three months *before* Nazi Germany invaded the USSR on June 22nd 1941. So Roosevelt had already picked a side even before the war started. Besides, the Soviets paid what they got in gold bars which were shipped to the States. Politics aside, yes these are nice looking warbirds. Shame they were designed to kill people. The Polikarpov I-16 was really innovative in the early 30's The first Messerschmitt Bf109 ever shot down (in the Spanish Civil War) was by a I-16. Good evening.

[@nightrise45]

Politics aside goes into politics

[@user-PoltanovDmitriy]

@@wezmarauder2754 You are absolutely right !!! Thank you for such detailed and historically thorough answer ! Those who don't know the history-is doomed to repeat all the horror twice & thrice...

[@Goldencurry4]

"Politic aside"

[@user-mw4qd1sk2b]

НОВОСИБИРСК восстанавливает самолеты!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[@user-br3gn9sc4r]

Для зарубежных миллионеров на их деньги.

[@DauntlessAviation]

None of the beautiful aircraft in this video are Russian aircraft. Rather, they are Soviet aircraft developed in the Soviet Union of which Russia was one of many member states. While I don't want to at all diminish the Russian contribution to this, calling them "Russian" totally ignores the very significant non-Russian component. In the case of the AN-2, it could most correctly be called "Soviet" and less correctly "Ukrainian", since Antonov is in Ukraine, and "Russian" would be always wrong.

[@ERK191]

Как принято говорить у реставраторов - восстановление на деньги заказчика. Бизнес однако выше памяти и гордости. Ну да, конечно, самолёты продолжат вторую жизнь, увы не дома.

[@Treetop64]

Russian warbirds have an odd coolness about them. Русская WarBirds имеют нечетное прохладу о них.

[@HISPEEDLEVEL]

За то что поделились историчными самолетами плюс. А за тупое качество видео жирный минус. Мужики вы затрахали снимать авиацию в диком зуме! Хочешь показать самолет вблизи сними его на взлетке! Хочешь показать пилотаж держи горизонт или другой фон в кадре - кому нахер нужен трясущийся кадр нипонятно как летящего самолета?

[@alexanderreimer387]

Rat powered by RUSSIAN licensed Wright 1820...!!! Wall to wall cylinders...!!!

[@musckowit]

Да, Wright R-1820 Cyclone 9 хороший мотор, удачная конструкция. Первый двигатель, изготовленный в СССР по лицензии получил название М-25 и был впервые испытан 1 июня 1934 года. После модернизации в 1938 году стал называться М-62ИР, а с 1944 года АШ-62ИР (Аркадий Щвецов ). Этот двигатель сегодня эксплуатируется на самолётах Ан-2. Внушительный рабочий стаж. Кроме этого, на основе М-25 (Wright R-1820 Cyclone 9) был создан двух рядный двигатель М-82(в далнейшем АШ-82), который устанавливался на самолёты Втрой мировой войны Су-2, Ту-2 и легендарный Ла-5 и в послевоенное время самолёт Ил-14 и вертолёт Ми-4.