Now solving is easy without a calculator!!

[@claudiobuttazzo4513]

Hi, you need to explain at begin of exercise if it's a *""mix fraction"* or a *"multiplication"* I thought it's was ~> 999×998/999×999 = only to *998×999* and this is = to *"997002"* 💪! But if i do it as you in video with a SUM, then i will to do it with a faster method: instead to do it direct 999 + 998/999 × 999, (so for a moment i consider only the fraction 998/999 and i aggregate +1 to 998 ok? ~> so i will have this fraction [998+1]/999 = 999/999= "1"). In this case i will continue the exercise in this way: {999+1}×999= "999'000" ok? But to have the "real" result I need *to subtract* the FAMOUS "+1" (that i sum before to 998) to 999'000 and the correct result will be ~> 999'000 - 1 = *"998'999"* 😊🤙 You understand what I meant?🙆‍♂️

[@old-trader]

ربما تحتاج الى تعلم كيفية فك رقم بجانبه كسر ، عندما يكون لديك رقم بجانبه كسر (مثلا واحد و نصف 1,1/2) و تريد تحويله الى كسر فانك تضرب الواحد في المقام (٢) و تجمعه مع البسط ليصبح الكسر ٣ على ٢ لا بد من ضرب ٩٩٩ في المقام (٩٩٩) ثم اجمعه مع ٩٩٨ ليصبح كل ذلك رقم البسط الجديد اعلى شرطة الكسر و تحتها ٩٩٩ و كل ذلك الرقم مضروبا × ٩٩٩ الان تستطيع اختصار الرقم الاخير مع الرقم تحت للشرطة بيتبقى لك ٩٩٩×٩٩٩ + ٩٩٨

[@superman00001]

Can’t get enough of your beautiful voice ❤

[@nikitabiryukov2468]

I suppose, in different countries there is different schooll math! Seems like many people in comments don't know that 1½ equals 1.5, not 1*1/2=0.5 (or maybe the have just forgotten their junior school years)

[@theacarp6807]

Love the solve

[@zachvanwolf2123]

There are many brilliant female mathematicians for sure out there. But to quote Bill Burr: "Women are often wrong, but don't admit it. And no one corrects them, because we all want to .... 'em!" What a complicated way of solving that myopic little thing, just to end up with a wrong solution! And then not to make a counter check WITH a calculator before posting it on YT is quite a level of overconfidence. That levrl of ego! My sister - who I admire for lots of other qualities - was always bad in maths. But guess what: She's a math teacher now and miseducating whole new generations that will end up being so bad in math, or lose their interest into it, because her logic of explaining things is futile. What a world! Probably this lady has done so on purpose, just to get more clicks, reactions and (dis-)likes.

[@old-trader]

ربما يجب ان تذهب انت للمدرسة الابتدائية لتعلم اساسيات الرياضيات الطريقة صحيحة و الناتج صحيح تماما.. فقط جربه بالالة الحاسبة ‏‪ان كنت تعرف كيف تحول رقم بجانبه كسر الى كسر ثم قم بتكملة المسألة

[@ankitadwivedi106]

Many times I can't focus on method because of your gentle voice

[@firekiller2141]

💀💀💀

[@ananyasain1241]

Bruh 😑😑💀💀

[@old-trader]

من الواضح ان الكثيرين من اصحاب التعليقات لا يعرفون اساسيات الرياضبات، او ربما اختلط عليهم الامر كا المشكلة انهم لا يعرفون ميفية حساب الكسر المختلط (رقم بحانبه كسر )

[@wikideenu]

Got to remember, if there isn't a parenthesis next to the fraction it's not a multiplication. Just like writing out one and one half looks like 1 1/2

[@Jantocz1]

There's much simpler way to solve the problem. You can do it in your head

[@predmestinanataliivan]

Так в самом начале было ясно ,переведи в неправильную дробь ,а потом сократи. И потом работай дальше . Я врач ,мне 61. Ухожу в задачи от действительности

[@didikkurniawanbelajardanhi9183]

i love Math

[@r.s.hildebrant2012]

This is why we stop using mixed numbers in high school

[@chowtuk]

can you make a video explain a * b/c = a + b/c ?

[@Nuggetextrachicken]

For instance, 5/2 is 2.5 which is 2+(0.5) which is 2+(1/2). The notation for the ‘improper’ fraction is confusing: we aren’t multiplying a with b then dividing by c

[@ananyasain1241]

It's Very Easy The Process Of Them It's The Same ☺️☺️

[@chowtuk]

@@Nuggetextrachicken oh thank you

[@MathsMadeSimple101]

What does LK stand for in LK logic?

[@ankitadwivedi106]

First like of video

[@Mr.Vlvo23e-my5xh]

2:14🎉 2:14 2:14

[@ivanangeli]

wait. 0:29 AxB/C is not = A+ B/C right?

[@Jantocz1]

You can figure it out using small numbers without going into difficult calculations

[@yabassta]

I know it's wrong but the ASMR...

[@ankitadwivedi106]

Im your consecutive watcher mam

[@TheJabalpuriyas]

Vedic maths 😂

[@nrellis666]

it's much easier to start by rewriting the problem as (1000 - (1/999))*999; then 999000 - (999/999), then 999000 - 1, then 998999

[@milanlukic2586]

Bravo!

[@АлександрМарьинских-ч6й]

solved this example in the same way

[@pavloskairis9994]

it does not look like a mixed fraction.

[@williamgordon5708]

A lot of folks here are definitely gonna be looking for platform 9¾ and ending up on platform 6.75😢 Same question they used to bar the less acute ones from entering shadow wizard money gang…

[@ceciliafreitas7856]

998 000

[@rodman2021]

I think the demonstration is wrong

[@ThomasTT]

my answer is 998 * 999 = 997002, what's wrong with me?

[@old-trader]

يجب ان تضرب كالاتي 999×999 تم تجمع عليها 998 جربها

[@EdwardButter]

Why shoud I solved it?

[@zuckerfee9928]

that's noncens

[@shafikkvettam6842]

997002 is the answer

[@santoshkumar-pg9rs]

Wrong answer 997002 is right answer

[@vaishalidubey4020]

use a calculator you'll get it

[@old-trader]

999×999 + 998

[@santoshkumar-pg9rs]

@@vaishalidubey4020 could you explain me?

[@santoshkumar-pg9rs]

@@vaishalidubey4020 I get it he is right

[@ankitadwivedi106]

First comment please heart me

[@gozsu]

Why on earth are you bothering with such lengthy large-digit numbers when you could've saved time and effort by starting with (a+1) and (a-1)? The solution should have been more concise and practical. 😉

[@thiyanaeshkavi1898]

Correct me If I'm wrong, I think this can be easily solved by =(1000-1/999)*999 =999000-1 =998999

[@shafikkvettam6842]

997002 is the answer

[@gcypress]

Wrong answer

[@punjungmedaraji3923]

I used calculator and the answer is correct

[@muratbayraktar5035]

Bro is trying to gaslight.

[@old-trader]

الطريقة صحيحة

[@gibson2623]

a(b/c) = a+(b/c) ???????....What drugs are you taking? they seem to be great

[@mrnibba4565]

Bro it's not a(b/c) , she is representing a.b/c in improper fraction, you mistook it to be multiplication, thank me later

[@ДаниилКадетов-и9з]

​@@mrnibba4565 You are correct. It's mixed fraction notation to be precise. But this notation is almost never used outside of elementary school and "a b/c" would be almost universally interpreted as "a*b/c". Without explicit statement about mixed fractions used notation is very ambiguous and misleading. So "mistook" is not a correct word in this situation, "not interpreted as elementary student would" fits much better.

[@TheHighborn]

Huh? Its all multiplication. Just cors out the first 2 999, and whats left is 998*999, and thats easy to calculate on paper.

[@pieterjlansbergen6988]

Totally wrong. You can’t change a multiplication with a sum without changing the outcome.

[@superman00001]

It’s totally right. You are wrong.

[@pieterjlansbergen6988]

@@superman00001lol😂 maths is not an opinion

[@superman00001]

@@pieterjlansbergen6988 Indeed not. And your opinion on the matter is wrong.

[@superman00001]

Watch again.

[@pieterjlansbergen6988]

Sorry but a b/c = a * b/c (Multiplication is implied if not specified, not the sum. Like ab = a*b not a+b) no need to watch again

[@souvikmukherjee8497]

Eh why so hard way? 999.999+998 = 999.999+999-1 = 999.1000-1 = 998999 U are making this sooo hard!

[@robertszilva1304]

997002

[@dwis5489]

You're wrong 998 devided by 999 = 0,9989 and then you add 999 to 0,9989 and you'd get 999,998 999,998 × 999 = 998.999.. she's right. Remember that 3 1/2 is 3,5 not 1,5 ...

[@robertszilva1304]

@@dwis5489 theres a problem with the assignment - i see 999 x 998/999 x 999. I dont see 999 + 998/999 x 999. And 3x1/2 = 3 1/2 = 3 ½ is 1,5

[@dwis5489]

​@@robertszilva1304It's different... 3 1/2 = 3,5 = 35/10 and then divided by 5 each number and you get 7/2 = 3 1/2 If 3 1/2 is 1,5 = 15/10 = 3/2 = 1 1/2 ???

[@happyfacederp]

​@@dwis5489 thank you for this explaination I assumed the same that it was being multiplied and not a mixed fraction.

[@fadetoblah2883]

@@dwis5489 The solution offered by LKLogic is itself correct. However, as evidenced by the high proportion of people who are baffled and/or claim that it is wrong, the way the equation is written leaves too much room for interpretation, especially for those who attempt to solve it just from the thumbnail. It's not at all obvious that "999 998/999" should be read as a mixed fraction; this is what (needlessly) trips people up: many read it as "999 x 998/999" (leading to @robertszilva's final answer of 997002) instead of "(999 + 998/999)", leading to the video's solution. I cannot blame those people. Personally, I had to play the first 15 seconds of the video (until she mentions "mixed numbers") to make sure of what was being asked.