Nuclear-Powered Sky Hotel

[@lorez201]

What if we combined the Titanic with the Hindenburg and then put a nuclear reactor in it? What if.

[@10thejgm78]

This deserves more likes

[@kotamin6740]

I cant breathe 🤣😂 best slogan ever

[@flashtoney1112]

HahahaHAahaha 😆 😂 😆 😂

[@HR-Vibes1996]

Omg im dying 🤣🤣

[@paulvideo05]

Nothing could go wrong!

[@KLSYFY]

The designers at Fisher Price must be proud to see their vision come close to reality.

[@Ginab3001]

I knew that plane reminded me of something😂

[@m-jay356]

Lol

[@peterromano1911]

Looks more like a LEGO plane to me....

[@macdean]

still waiting for the nuclear popping law mower

[@geemanbmw]

🤣 I stop breathing 🤣

[@slayerd357]

"A small nuclear reactor uses highly controlled fusion reaction..." Glad they have a firm grip on physics before they build this thing. Must be the same guy that designed the wheels to stay down the whole time. Speaking of which I love that it's the size of a city but has like 20 wheels. Overall it's a win.

[@fatherhang]

😂😂

[@Alexthemeh4214]

It's not even real, it's from reddit.

[@skeetrix5577]

agreed OP this is the most stupid thing I've ever seen in my entire life. who is this guy? is he some kind of scammer to get Investment money?!

[@misterdrgn5155]

@@skeetrix5577 He's an animator. It's just a fun video. No one is supposed to take it seriously, but a surprising number of people do.

[@myvividmemories]

@@skeetrix5577​​⁠this is a funny little concept that would be cool. It’s obviously impossible with modern technology, but it’s fun to think about how cool it would be. This behavior is outright irritating and sad. he never even mentioned investment money or making this real.

[@jtompkins1277]

If physics and aerodynamics didn't exist, then this vessel might actually be able to take off.

[@axios1229]

best comment

[@csakamatsu]

Better made it as dirigibles.

[@ryanjones2584]

oh but you forgot about the exotic element Unobtanium which can defy gravity :) damn it i was excited about this for a second.

[@dannyphantom8267]

I’m saying bruh this don’t look like it’s meant to be in the sky

[@fabo_7135]

Looks bad ass

[@MarkiusFox]

"Thanks to nuclear energy, the hotel never runs out of fuel and can remain suspended in the air for several years without ever touching the ground." The passengers and crew on the other hand must fight to survive in the evolving aero-thunderdome.

[@TheMrFunktastic2]

I love it. It's like Snowpiercer, but in the air! Coming soon to Netflix!

[@SassyXR6007]

🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂

[@Wheelbeer]

Easy for maintenance (reactors ??) when you konw that for a regular plane there is at least a basic check every 500 hours.... this thing is so dumb..

[@ericharris1526]

I didn't want to go on this until I heard "evolving aero-thunderdome". Now I'm fully on board with the idea. I'm going back up to the buffet did you want anything honey? More shrimp please Ok, be right back... (Takes off shirt and sprays face) WITNESS MEEEE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[@kyle857]

Will make for a hell of a bioshock game.

[@wingspantt]

It's a Titanic with ZERO lifeboats. Amazing.

[@Seq-ei2pw]

wont you need a parachute?

[@zach4936]

​@@Seq-ei2pwIf a plane is going down then you probably won't get to a spot where you can actually jump out with a parachute, thats if U can get a parachute before too

[@jckoibra2662]

@@zach4936 They should have escape pods like on spaceships in science fiction, and they are like small balloon baskets but with parachutes instead of a balloon. And they are all over the ship including top, bottom and side.

[@jckoibra2662]

@@zach4936 Every escape pod can fit 5 people and there are 2000 escape pods. (1000 extra so that they are more accessible). If the engines or hull is failing the captain makes and announcement on the intercom and tries to keep the plane up as long as possible. They have say 30 minutes until it crashes because: No1. The plane is very high up, in the stratosphere maybe. It will be very long before it hits the ground. And if there is g force while it is falling, it probably won’t be that big. No2. The planes pilots are very experienced trained pilots, almost as much as an astronaut, they can keep it up as long as possible and the plane even has retrorockets on the bottom in case of emergency to assist in keeping it up as long as possible. When the plane is about to hit the ground, the pilots and captain ejects using their ejection seats.

[@davidvonallmen19]

Did they need to specify that the nuclear reaction was "highly controlled?" Nuclear reactions that are not highly controlled are usually referred to as "atomic bombs."

[@darklordofbavaria6398]

😂

[@crazymothman6124]

So you mean it's a civilian bomb

[@ThePotionMaster413]

Can’t wait for this thing to explode mid-air and causes an entire continent to be trapped in a nuclear wasteland.

[@crazymothman6124]

@@ThePotionMaster413 stalker 2

[@donaldhobson8873]

Atom bombs are also controlled. That big of an explosion doesn't happen by accident. Uncontrolled reactions look more like Chernobyl. (The event, not the unrelated film of the same name)

[@todayschef1734]

You can draw it. You can hire voice actors. You cannot hide that this is an impossibility

[@daytonmedcalf197]

Anything is possible if you put your mind to it

[@vincentguevara684]

@@daytonmedcalf197 not this

[@kerbalengineeringsystems7415]

@@daytonmedcalf197 incorrect

[@richardbersaky]

@@daytonmedcalf197 well lets see you put your mind to it then homeboy. go on do it.

[@randy4903]

@@daytonmedcalf197 no, physics can still win regardless of how hard you try to violate it

[@CanadianPrepper]

Hindenburg 2.0

[@janhansen554]

It will never fly...

[@SohailAmin]

Need a movie on a post apocalyptical world where everyone stays on the sky hotel

[@Necrometer]

Skypiercer!

[@Rize_Inn]

@@Necrometer Nice!! Bring on the Skypiercer limited series.

[@loglad5394]

That's called wall e

[@michaelhoward088]

I believe it’s called wall-e haha

[@eksine]

USS ENTERPRISE

[@ZanarGaming]

It would be impossible to convince investors this thing would fly

[@TheInvisibleCar]

And if they did I think it would only be a matter of time before we would be watching some breaking TV news report that includes the phrase "Oh, the humanity!"

[@itsfact-2812]

I am pretty much convinced and now I am ready to invest 1 $ 😂

[@howyabendoin]

Cool idea. You probably would need a super long runway, or you could bring it up into space in pieces, assemble it, and launch from there or high up in the atmosphere. Knowing how much planes need maintenance, I doubt this thing could stay in the air longer than a week. This is definitely giving me Titanic vibes...

[@WhenTheTucker]

Every single aeronautical engineer is crying right now

[@DigBipper188]

I'm not an aeronautical engineer, but I know a bad design when I see one... and this one... is bloody horrific!! XDD

[@richardbersaky]

every single human with a brain and basic understanding of physics is freakin crying. as an aero engineer, my gut is hurting and i want to vomit.

[@mcnuggatron2129]

I'm not an engineer but but DAMN. I understand the basics of heavier than air flight. My thoughts are that there may be like a 1% chance that it could take off, but it's stall speed would be like 500 mph, and I'm probably being too generous. Realistically, I'm guessing it would just fall apart lmao.

[@matsv201]

That might be true... but.. i bet you its not for the reason you are thinking

[@kacperlipczynski1693]

As a kerbal space program player I cry

[@rustychassis]

Looks as aerodynamic as a pug dog, and about as well designed.

[@kyle857]

@@hrmn4694 This isn't built for lift either.

[@kyle857]

It's a pretty obvious troll. A good way to test which "engineering news" websites are completely idiotic though.

[@MrUranium238]

designed by Homer Simpson

[@havaguday]

What's with the pug hatred?

[@garrett2214]

You're not throwing your pugs hard enough

[@wordbird711]

The fantasy is hillarious! Kudos to Hashem and his team for such attention to detail in this fantastic (fantasy) production.

[@jonathanstempleton7864]

I bet I still end up next to someone else's screaming three year old for the entire trip

[@johnpatrickproperties]

Sky cruise uses innovative nuclear energy which can keep sky cruise suspended in air for several years. So by the time your cruise is over, the screaming 3 year old will be a screaming 6 year old.

[@myimperfectdiary890]

Push him off

[@FreezyOffTheWall]

Bro you were litteraly quoted on some news website 😂

[@brighteyes6585]

wouldn't they make it more like a blimp than a jet? It's bigger than a space shuttle and would probably need help getting in the air in the first place, also landing, OMG...

[@johnpatrickproperties]

@@FreezyOffTheWall who was lol send the link if you don’t mind

[@johngerity]

Hilarious! It's like someone got in a time machine, traveled to 2070, found a retrofuturism video based on our era (as opposed to the 1950s or 1800s) depicting what people from our era thought our future would look like.

[@didthisonce3835]

Leave Britney alone

[@MrCarameloso]

Like a Bantha

[@HaYeetBruh69]

More like someone found out how to use cg software and ignore science

[@Makron5]

I wish I had as nice of a vision of the future as you, I'm from the US and oh boy....post apocalyptic fiction is a big hit for a reason here.

[@waynef9314]

😂🤣😆 Right, if you're going to build something this big. Then it might as well be a Starship in space. 🤔🤔👍😎

[@lightningmcqueenshoes6431]

We had something like this in the 1910s, but it was actually functional. It was called a blimp.

[@rockerseven]

That thing would need a runway as long as the one in Fast and Furious 6 just to take off and land lol.

[@dvilleonthemap99]

🤣

[@richardbersaky]

wont even be enough

[@MidgarMerc]

but it NEVER LANDS (lmao)

[@ahmedshakil405]

@@MidgarMerc just like titanic never sinks (lmao)

[@familiafeliznacozinha5944]

could be a seaplane!!

[@Arrow14100]

This is literally just the Axiom ad from Wall-e lol

[@ChickenJoe12]

The whole high tech medical bed looks like it’s straight out of Elysium too lol

[@rafaellima6383]

This is completely insane and i love it

[@DMGaina]

Good job honey, I will pin it on the fridge to your other drawings.

[@bennewman25]

Cool, so we just need to perfect fusion, invent miniature fusion reactors, then figure out how to use those to power insanely powerful jets that somehow keep that thing in the air and then boom. Probably see it flying by next year I reckon.

[@paulvideo05]

Yeah... no big deal.

[@duartesamuel2651]

🤣

[@gregoriohb]

Also a nuclear reactor that doesn't need water to be cooled down. It seems pretty easy to take all that water up there, constantly.

[@spacemanrick2014]

@@gregoriohb a few huge condensers, massive airfoils to direct the air stream in, and a few 100,000 gallon holding tanks might do the trick. Have a series of pumps with redundancy move the closed loop around.

[@ratedmark4704]

@@spacemanrick2014 I am not saying this is possible, however I think collecting condensation from condensers, and using air handlers to manage steam for comfort cooling. Making this orbital makes more sense, Turbines wouldn't be needed lowering power consumption. Now time to deal with gravity.

[@DrAnarhcy]

Behold! The Titanic-Hindenburg-Chernobyl Plane!

[@JosephsDesign]

Many news sites and articles have jumped on a bandwagon sharing this guys work as a “planned nuclear powered airship.” But this guy wasn’t trying to pretend this was a real idea, he originally posted this video on Reddit world building, a place for fictional projects. This guy is just passionate about sci-fi airships and these news articles stole his stuff straight from Reddit, without fact checking it, and claimed it to be a real project in the works. To give this guy credit he never claimed it was real, posted it on a fiction Reddit page, and actually made it really cool. More effort went into this that the majority of real “futuristic” project scams.

[@xyecon]

That's disappointing, yet comforting at the same time. Thank you for enlightening me. *confused slant face*

[@guidestone1392]

Hindenburg meets Titanic meets Chernobyl. Anyone who tries to build this belongs in a mental hospital.

[@zed12-ui4jy]

Hubris? what's that?

[@maxwelldaly5845]

Hindenburg + Titanic + Chernobyl = greatest transport disaster in history. Anyone who tries to build this is the definition of insane.

[@kintenkinten]

"Sleek design". Glad to know I can now start calling myself sleek.

[@vladimirirkhin]

Lmao

[@NathanChilton]

"You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means."

[@oneiropagides342]

The designers forgot this thing is supposed to fly… Ergo, they need to adhere to the principles of aerodynamics 😂

[@ravandbamerni2601]

What is aerodynamic?

[@joelkaben]

It's not about the principles of aerodynamics. We simply don't have the technology yet... for a thing like this.

[@TorianArmrag]

Aerodynamics? You mean Plane-Magic?

[@PJ_PARA]

That's what I noticed the most. The two main forces you need to overcome to travel in the air: gravity and drag. Those wing shapes won't work, that's not how the Bernoulli effect works. And as for drag, well those struts holding up the observation deck are terrible, and the external lifts are ridiculous. It looks like they've been designed by the people who created the Yorkshire Airlines sketch for the Hale and Pace comedy show.

[@ToneSherpa]

I reckon if someone ever figures out how to do antigravity they might be able to get this thing in the air hahaha

[@kristinswenson4433]

Nuclear fusion is at least 100 years from being possible as an energy source. That's just for viewers thinking this is a polished glossy ad for an existing product. This is a fascinating sci-fi story. I love your imagination. I don't think people understand your superior creative intelligence correctly. I love it. Thank you.

[@erindreams5610]

But don't they already use it on ships?

[@DiscoGreen]

They lost me with swimming pools.. still trying to imagine the pools on those rare take off and landings... and loved the anti turbulance... animation and the "say goodbye to fear of flying" yet to get there... YOU FREAKING FLY

[@shart7660]

Maybe they drain the pool everytime they take off of land...

[@DiscoGreen]

@@shart7660 it will NEVER happen. Not the pools nor the flying nuclear hotel

[@sergevolkoff8650]

Ok. Pools. Did you notice how they progressively limit the baggage weight? In practically empty aluminuim tubes with wings? And now we have several tonns of water :) (Small 10 meter pool 5 m wide and 2 m depth weights 100 t) Somehow you should clean this water. I hope not with nuclear fission :) Another matter: trash. One thing when you sit in one place and fed with two dishes. Other thing - when you live. Look outside and check how many garbage produce... say... big household with 300-400 occupants. Multiply 10-15 times. And before that garbage become garbage you have to deliver it. So aerodynamics... Maintenance... Energy... Logistics... Psychology...

[@darklordofbavaria6398]

The pools are still the most plausible Thing on this plane

[@RaymondHng]

Think of the waste water tanks.

[@manasmurali4143]

The Technology and Aerodynamics aside this thing is gonna cost billions of dollar to make just to begin with, and I very much doubt whether it will even be a profitable enterprise. But the design and animation in this video is damn good. The guy's clearly put effort

[@ВиталийМышакин]

Как вы воду в бассейнах менять будете?

[@nelqui7685]

@@ВиталийМышакин сколько воды в бассейне нужно для фильтрации воды и замены ее дождевой водой skolʹko vody v basseyne nuzhno dlya filʹtratsii vody i zameny yeye dozhdevoy vodoy

[@MrAaronBlues]

With people like you we would never have had computers

[@Ms123kill]

Surely it can given savings on fuel and 5000 passenger per flight. However the idea is quite flawed atm.

[@lsear2905]

The landing gear being permanently down was a disappointing oversight

[@zilverboi]

This is literally what we all imagined flying airports would look like

[@abraxas365]

This looks like it was designed by someone familiar with the concept of an "airplane" but doesn't understand how they actually work.

[@vborovikov]

designed by Apple in California

[@gringoloco8576]

I'm a pilot and small plane owner. I can confirm they have zero understanding.

[@stephentroyer3831]

First off, those exposed elevators are a big nope for me. Uneven drag would also like a word on those. The engines look suspiciously like jet engines, fusion reaction is used as a magic future energy source, and your animation never bothered to raise the landing gear. Edit: Also, huge wheel chocks that lift the rear end off the ground? Come on, man. End edit It's a neat idea that could be done with nuclear fusion, but it needs more experts in several fields and multiple iterations to become something workable

[@Hell-yeah420.69]

I thought the same thing about those elevators. They should be built inside the same structure it protrudes from

[@tetsatou2815]

@@Hell-yeah420.69 Also the loading elevator for mid-flight passenger and cargo transfers makes me shudder.

[@Hell-yeah420.69]

@@tetsatou2815 i made a separate comment about that too 4:00 like how is that even possible!? You need an entire track to land a damn boeing

[@wike1138]

Not to mention everything is out of scale. Compared to the decks and the other planes on the ground the elevators are massive.

[@TheClonetruper]

The maintenance alone on this would make it impractical. Any flight longer than a week could possibly put it into a maintenance cycle of Weeks to MONTHS.

[@bloomp7999]

it's like seeing my crazy kids machine drawing come to life ! amazing renders !

[@mrangryburger1914]

That thing is massive, it's at least 20 times larger than any commercial airplane. I can't even imagine the amount of maintenence something this massive would need. And how many pilots would you need to fly that thing??

[@MrCCollins1993]

Probably all AI controlled. It's like something out of Thunderbirds 😅 Still, an... interesting concept

[@tetsatou2815]

If you look closely, each wheel is about the size of 747s.

[@tetsatou2815]

@@MrCCollins1993 It's not. It's an abomination. The ghosts of the Wright brothers would be strangling these guys in their sleep if they'd stop suing Mr. Curtiss for violating their patent on undeath. Although Tony Holmsten is great, and you should absolutely check out his work.

[@DigBipper188]

Easily more. That first clip had it sat on the ramp around a load of Boeing 747s... If you've ever seen one up close or been on one - Those are some massive freakin' planes!! For pilots required, if you do your avionics properly, you could still get away with two pilots and a flight engineer tops. the only reaon for the flight engineer would be to monitor all twenty EDFs. They'd probably also have to be nuclear trained for the reactor but that's a minor technicality :) lmao

[@lolowski6826]

Forget the maintenance, can you imagine what would happen if that thing hit a turbulence? (And no, "anti vibration technology" is bullshit) With all those open spaces, malls, restaurants and pools? It would turn people into needle cushions and completely wreck all of those posh vanity temples. Even if the concept art was designed by an actual engineer and not some random 3D artist, It is an absurd idea that will never work. At this size, this thing would never lift from the ground, not with the current technology anyways. And the fusion reactor that they are showing as the power source? Yeah, it's obvious that whoever thought of that had absolutely no idea what they are talking about.

[@cheesybean158]

I love when people come up with engineering concepts with very little consideration or understanding of engineering.

[@cmddelete2169]

Or physics, gravity, science in general.

[@barbsohare4594]

Wheres the washing machine

[@reese3881]

That's how inventions are made. Everything starts as an idea and evolves. Guess a degree can't teach you common sense.

[@cheesybean158]

@@reese3881 no it isn't. Inventions are born from new ideas based on theories using information we know to be true. Not some half baked concept that fails to answer even the simplest questions such as how do you get this thing off the ground given it would have to be the size of a small town, how do you service essential/hard to reach systems during flight, how do you land during an emergency.

[@reese3881]

@@cheesybean158 so what did the Wright Brothers know to be true about flying? Cause that was a completely new concept. Exactly

[@matthewslee910]

Even though we know an aircraft like that would absolutely never come into fruition, this is nevertheless still quite a fun video to watch right here. Don't you guys agree?

[@bigfootsbrotherwhohasgaine6427]

Agreed

[@gogurt836]

You never know man, shit we thought that wasn’t possible were invented and at this point idk what’s viable and what isn’t anymore

[@matthewslee910]

@@gogurt836 That's honestly so true.

[@slavvy.mp4884]

Tbh it's not because the amount of news that unironically turned this literally work of pure mythical fiction into an actual serious article infuriates me down to the bone

[@joemummerth8340]

it`s straight out of 30`s , 40`s and 50`s sci fi ! read about things like this when I was just a kid ! lol

[@AaronSethPrice]

I feel like this is where all the rich people are going to hide during the apocalypse, and just fly around above all the rest of the world while everyone is fighting each other Mad Max style

[@pythontf188]

Well good news for you gravity is a thing so this can never take off

[@alexhurlbut]

@@pythontf188 plus the plane need to be resupplied. So, if the whole world is wasted and everyone is fighting each other....where will the supplies come from?

[@AaronSethPrice]

@@pythontf188 😂, fair point

[@AaronSethPrice]

@@alexhurlbut secret rich people societies that have already hoarded supplies? the Illuminati?

[@alexhurlbut]

@@AaronSethPrice good on them if they managed to keep control of airstrips large enough to operate their cargo planes to supply the mighty sky hotel. :P

[@Dr_Adamo]

Imagine going down the external elevators and hearing the metal buckle and screech as air friction is trying to tear it off with you inside.

[@CrystalApex]

Not only that, they're talking about resupplying MID FLIGHT, using hook up elevators to regular sized planes which will have to be custom fit to use these elevators..... It's like these people aren't even thinking at all, not that I'm certain they even have a brain.. I'm 1000% certain this is some type of crypto scam.

[@billyjbryant]

Or the crushing pressure of being 100km in the air just suffocates you as you move between the pressurized cabin into the no way it can be pressurized enough elevator.

[@Petsimnonsense1723]

everyone gangsta until it crashes

[@spacemanrick2014]

And I bring to you, the one-billion-dollar tire. Imagine the factory needed just to make one tire. One tire would need a series of massive compressors running for 36 hours pumping an unheard of amount of nitrogen just to pressurize one tire.

[@Scottagram]

At this point I think it'd be better off as a sea plane.

[@ashitaka1337]

@@Scottagram too bad we dont have huge ships who work as floating hotels with all that stuff. We could call them cruise ships.

[@Johninadelaide2022]

@@ashitaka1337 Imagine that. Ocean liners what a concept? /s

[@realwordsoftruth]

Love how it takes off from an airport that couldn't even handle anything larger than a 747. And what kind of pilot flies with the landing gear down? That's not a Cessna 172 you know.

[@jesi2196]

It said in the video that it would have NO PILOTS 😂😂😂

[@sarah311979]

The aliens are getting smarter. What a great way to abduct 5000 people.....😂

[@mmarshall8259]

It's like something a child from the 80's thought 2020 would be like. It just needs a race track adding.

[@johnabbottphotography]

The 16 year old boy who designed this is as talented as the person who thought up Solar Roadways. Neither thought about engineering much. But they made a fun animation. Problems: * The giant skydome would take so much weight in plexiglass to make something thick enough to withstand both the pressure differential and the outside force on the bubble in flight, that you would need wings bigger than the plane to lift it. There is a reason why the windows on plane are so small. * As others have noted, those elevators would both destroy the aerodynamics of the plane and take ridiculous amounts of engineering to keep them on the mother ship while in flight. * The sheer weight of such a vehicle would be so much that *even if* you were able to engineer runways that would survive the impact of landing, there are no wheels known to mankind that would survive that kind of weight above it, without adding to the weight, which would then increase the amount of weight that the wheels would weigh.... etc. Not to mention getting something that big to spin on landing??? That first touch would most likely rip off all of the gear. * What is that air conditioning duct cover on the top of the plane, forward? Is that to vent all of the cooking fumes from the food that you'll run out of on the second day? * Every amenity they add has weight. There's a reason why planes keep amenities low. A pool? The very reason why ships can have so many amenities is because they float in the water, and as long as there is more "air" inside the boat than outside of the boat's edges, there's a lot to keep it above the water. In a plane, carrying water is akin to carrying gas; its dead weight.

[@typhonplume9374]

Solar panel roadways, while not designed by a 16 year old are a viable idea, though it ran in to problems such as keeping the road clean, and folks stealing the solar panels for there own personal use. Ther are companies world wide, most notably in the US looking for ways to make the idea more viable.

[@johnabbottphotography]

@Mysticꀭ SEE: Solar Roadways. If people hadn't taken solar roadways seriously, I wouldn't feel the need to explain why this is also a bad idea.

[@johnabbottphotography]

@@typhonplume9374 "Solar panel roadways, while not designed by a 16 year old are a viable idea..." Its not only one of the worst ideas out there, but entire videos have been made to explain why its such a bad idea. Short version: Why use roads, the #1 place in our world where heavy vehicles constantly travel over (literally leaving their treads behind), for solar panels, which are notoriously fragile and need to be kept clean? Why not put the panels literally anywhere else? Don't believe me. Believe the EE guy. kzbin.info/www/bejne/pZO2Z4eLi7iNmtU

[@llamaskank]

And the landing gear just hangs out the whole time on the bottom...? 🤦🏻‍♂️

[@fallu6224]

You used more time writing this than the designers with the plane

[@PaleCentaur]

"with its sleek design" This machine most closely approximates the shape of "cartoon whale."

[@changecraft6354]

Apart from some fancy imaginations, looking at this video with just the bare minimum of knowledge in engineering gives you a lot of "wow this is not even remotely feasible

[@bassett_green]

I like the part where they are flying in the middle of aurora borealis at 100km with the landing gear down.

[@skipthefox4858]

Yea they probably have no idea that the landing gear increase drag ( they don’t know how planes work )

[@miroslavbriza]

There wasn’t any energy left for that. All of it went to making of steamed hams!

[@sergevolkoff8650]

We like every part of this video :)

[@ericmckinley7985]

@@miroslavbriza You call hamburgers "steamed hams?"

[@Justgogaming]

4:02 I love how that B747 looks so small

[@Jtitor177]

Looks like the elite are preparing a ship to escape Armageddon.

[@rayinfinity8452]

Brought to you by Vault-Tec 😃

[@mikkel066h]

Titanic and Hindenburg combined into one. Can't imagine a city sized plane with a nuclear reactor crashing any where is not going to have any types of fatalities

[@flightsystems6260]

Interesting concept and looks pretty, but this video suggests that the designer knows very very very little about aircraft design, product engineering, systems engineering, weather patterns, airport design, and numerous other areas. The aerodynamic concept is horrible. The double wing with the engines sandwiched like this would result in enormous drag. The same for the external elevators and the tail configuration. Other aircraft might have a tough time approaching for delivery or pickup as shown, due to flow patterns around this aircraft. The elevator for docking would suffer extreme vibration. There are many areas that will not be able to receive maintenance in flight because they require work external to the aircraft. There are no airports that can support such a large aircraft, both in terms of runway width and runway load capacity. The huge glass surfaces and the overall shape of the fuselage and tail panoramic platform will have severe structural stresses due to pressurization and aeroelastic and other loads. Other than providing redundancy for safety purposes plus thrust for takeoff,, the 20 engines might not add much. Artificial intelligence might be able to rely on weather radar for the prediction of turbulence, but may not always be able to predict accurately and could have erroneous predictions (machine learning is only as good as its training and is non-deterministic). Perhaps not all turbulence could be avoided in time. Also, producing an interference vibration might not logged the structural loads even if it improves passenger comfort - just flying through it may not be a great idea for something that has such terrible structural considerations. Overall, this concept -might- be okay for a ***spaceship***, as long as it is built in space and never needs to re-enter any planet's atmosphere.

[@sergevolkoff8650]

@@s2garage Nah. It's just one point of view. Just two more, for example: 5000 people is quite enough to escape from the problem of "5 men in one compartment" but still - small space, same people - it's a hotel. You have to deliver and get people back. So simple transit problem. They eat, they (pardon me french) shit. So you have to deliver quite wide range of food to the taste. Ok, trash you can just drop. You know the name people will choose for the plane, right? :) Personnel. Ok, it will be like english service - family under the stairs. Once and forever :)

[@evil7011]

its already busted kzbin.info/www/bejne/bWSniaynjJ6prKc

[@pavan151]

Love it. The video creator was like "lets make all the 747s look small and make this thing look gigantic while still fitting on a taxiway"

[@osasunaitor]

The disproportion is ridiculous. Compare the size of windows in the 747s and the Flying Hotel, the scale is clearly wrong to make the FH look bigger than it is

[@lennarthoekveen9339]

I'm honestly more worried about the apparent CO² levels. Look at those trees!

[@CasuallyYobudwilson]

Ah yes, sky cruise, never lands on ground U get to never touch grass for years

[@lexxynubbers]

Not sure that being nuclear powered would be enough to allow you to ignore aerodynamics.

[@lbj4993]

True, but with enough thrust anything can become airborne; keeping it from falling apart is a different story...🤔🤪

[@kyle857]

Come on. Gotta grift investors somehow.

[@footose]

Or... How is it nuclear powered anyway?

[@gw6667]

Nuclear power is not power directly derived from fission/fusion, it just boils water that runs turbines to generate electricity. Yeah, this is stupid

[@Johninadelaide2022]

@@footose Fusion reactor drives the engines in the wings, he even says so in the video

[@RigelMainyu]

I must say, one of my recurrent dreams features this plane. More precisely, it has the glass dome in the middle, white rooms with beds and a smaller version of the mall.

[@Copper9]

Mine too and I'm a flight attendant.

[@mikedrop4421]

Does yours have a bowling alley? Miner's got a bowling alley. But no mall.

[@kenetickups6146]

I had a dream of something like this years ago, was like half the size and I mostly remember it having a pool

[@John15293]

Bro my dreams are always so boring and anxiety filled. Like a normal day where I've forgotten to do something that I needed to. I wanna visit the sky hotel in my dreams

[@LitoMike]

welcome to a non-aerodynamic, atrocious, ugly, fragile, badly made, psychics-bending, expensive absolute hellscape! :)

[@alt5z]

I'll take: "What if we combine the Titanic and the Hindenburg and Chernobyl ? " for a thousand Alex.

[@franciss.fernandez7581]

This video literally played out like the beginning of a movie where the plot is the most horrific, explosive, action-packed airplane accident ever.

[@vsg1980]

I like the aesthetics of it looking like a giant single seater.

[@antigarathorn]

Evektor Sportstar! I am here for this comment lol

[@jeanlucgiroud8599]

It neads a giant head in the glass dome to complete the illusion.

[@ciptalagudanhiburan]

Woooou amazing..... I love it.... Perfecto

[@Pigpenned]

Great idea putting a nuclear reactor in something that could malfunction and fall out of the sky.

[@tetsatou2815]

Well, fusion reactor. The image they show is clearly a Tokamak, which is reasonably safe. Worst case scenario is that the reactor loses containment, and throws rapidly cooling hydrogen plasma all over the interior. It'd absolutely thrash the plane, and due to the aircraft's mass alone, it'd be like dropping a Tall Boy on whatever it crashes into, but the fusion reactor would be the least problematic part of that scenario.

[@RyoIchimiya]

2:06 “A small controlled nuclear reactor uses a highly controlled fusion reaction.” Wow! A Tokamak FUSION REACTOR will be installed on an airplane. This is most ambitious point which moved me! I love it.

[@PureWater3950]

U serious?!

[@sheronelijah]

This is awesome.❤

[@ImOnAJourney]

Those elevators, though. There won’t be any wind around them to twist them off their rigging 🤦🏻

[@kayasky7712]

“Zero carbon footprint” so are we just gonna ignore the 747 just hanging around as the supply ship 🤣

[@E71]

No matter how silly this concept may seem, I like that people give thought to such potential advancements in technology. Beautiful dream but that's all it is, for now.

[@user_mubarak4]

It is true that I am very proud because the one who designed this thing is a Yemeni and his name is Hashem Al-Ghaili

[@cbouyio]

There are better things to dream and think about concepts and designs and progress... THIS is not, it is just moronic

[@p0rq]

​@@user_mubarak4Maybe it's Yemen to you, but it's "No, man" from me

[@user_mubarak4]

@@p0rq ،😏

[@kyle857]

Building something pointless isn't an advancement.

[@mohsinahmad2894]

This is something I've dreamt of as a child. This is genuinely striking my soul. It is actually a life mission of mine to have one one day. I cant begin to put into words how thankful I am that you are making that concept of mine a reality. This is making me so happy, I wish you guys the bestest of luck. This HAS to come intro fruition. I pray for you and your success, even if i dont obtain one, knowing it has come into existence in and of itself is enough for me. Please please please make this a reality. This is true class and elegance.

[@tarquela]

It's interesting as a concept, although unfeasible. Still, a good exercise in creativity. Perhaps a mega airship, powered by a small atomic reactor, is more viable. It would be a kind of floating citadel.

[@dudethatuploadsstuff4247]

A citadel is probably most likely definitely gonna b how they start this space shit officially.

[@kyle857]

It's a concept from the 50s but it was much better worked out then by the British with a flying wing design.

[@ElenarMT]

Nah this is not even good imagination. It's just lazy

[@markmiller6844]

Except it is not creative. It is just a mashup of old stuff including the shape; stolen from a small sport airplane. The glass "atrium" is just the clear plastic canopy of a small 2 seat plane.

[@Andris974]

Just two questions: 1. what about the ecological footprint of the production of this plane? 2. How will the “normal “aircrafts landing? Make sense questions, I think

[@Телевизор-т1щ]

Нормальные самолёты садится не будут, а будут отправлять вещи вниз находясь воздухе, примерно как дозаправка в воздухе - Normal planes will not land, but wild send things down while in the air, just like refueling in the air.

[@ElenarMT]

Apparently it doesn't have an eco footprint, because it's nuclear... LOL

[@Valero7]

Love it!

[@outtasightouttamind6263]

This is super weird. I've had recurring lucid dreams of being on board something like this. So weird to see concepts of something I've only seen in dreams.

[@wadeguidry6675]

Alexa is stealing your dreams.

[@johnb003]

Not that there aren't a plethora of other problems, a lot of people comment about the disastrous idea of a nuclear reactor on a plane. Just pointing out the author did suggest this is a fusion reactor and not fission. So your whole notion of meltdown and radioactive meltdown etc doesn't actually apply. That said, if this is a hydrogen fusion fuel, that might have combustion potential, so it could Hindenburg, and if it's dueterium tritium, it could also have neutron radiation during operation which would create some heavy weight to fly around not to leak. It's futuristic enough, let's just say they got proton boron11 working and there's no neutron radiation:)

[@StephanieLorenG]

Ok so hear me out, what if we did something like the Hindenburg and Titanic, but then also put Chernobyl on it? And make it look like Passengers and 2001: A Space Odyssey so we really freak them out when we tell them the ship is run by a nameless HAL. Great.

[@nyadpics]

Imagine getting married on the deck of this hotel-plaza-wellness plane, and several years later filing for divorce...

[@IveNeverStoodUp]

yeah marriage is so retarded. it's basically like if you want to be in a JRPG in real life and share your party's gald for some fucking reason

[@terryhall3960]

I have a feeling that right now, Elon Musk is looking at this video thinking "I'm going to build this for real..."

[@Rollercoastermadness24]

Imagine that thing crashing 😂😂😂

[@aresgodofwar1427]

It won't even fly

[@Settiis]

Sounds like a disaster waiting to happen. Looks cool anyways.

[@margaretchayka6878]

I'd still want an old-fashioned arcade where I can turn my tickets in for cheap-azz prizes.

[@Curt0137]

So we're giving the Titanic wings now and it's Nuclear powered .... yea this ought to work out just fine

[@Mark0Brazil]

Just imagine the runway for a such monster-sized takeoff/landing. With all this desire to make a luxury air hotel, wouldn't it be more practical to make a nuclear airship than a monster plane? 🤷‍♂️😝

[@blaster915]

You're not wrong!

[@danieltesttset9543]

You Need the runway from Fast and Furious 6 :D

[@ashitaka1337]

vtol. problem solved

[@ChrisGurin]

There was a proposed "Atomic Bomber" back in the 1950s (I think). There was even a model kit of the idea. They didn't bother to land the thing, instead using "parasite" fighters that would rendezvous and dock with the bomber for both crew relief and (I assume) fighter escorts, like something out of the "Thunderbirds". It wasn't electric powered: the "atomic engines" channeled exhaust directly from the reactor. A ground test in Montana (?) killed several hundred acres of forest. The project was cancelled.

[@paulvideo05]

Isn't there a documentary about this?

[@websterri]

That's because they didn't use electricity from the reactor to power the engines they used heat, and they didnt isolate the reactor in any way. It's not even close to the same thing.

[@EricAllen8494]

If Incorporated Quantum material using frictionless aerodynamics; it's somewhat possible with fusion. Helion fusion has a fusion engine in stage ~7, let alone possible anti-gravity tech being researched at universities. Considering gravity is just energy to energy attraction. Everything is made of Energy and has a gravitational field.

[@LaStryka]

if they could get the government to tweak this into a space station orbiting earth, humans could finally be space explorers for real and wouldn't have to live on Earth if they didn't want to

[@81brassglass79]

Your idealistic "tweaking" hurts my engineer brain. Also your willingness to allow the government to tweak anything concerns me greatly...

[@thegodphreaker]

Yeah, let's just go destroy other planets instead of fix our own... makes sense 🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@racheln.spaterost2709]

This looks like something that Dwayne Johnson would have to save people from.

[@alialharazi5092]

انت ياهاشم ممكن اقول انك الوحيد اليمني الي افتخر فيه

[@s.1227]

اليمن ولادة للعباقرة والمبدعين لكن للاسف لم يجدوا من يدعمهم ويحول خيالاتهم واحلامهم الى حقيقة .. بلاد تنهشه كل عوامل الفرقة والتخلف والتأمر الخارجي ..

[@MrGusPlato]

Funny how they never tell you how much this 5000-person flying city weighs. Or its wingspan. Does anybody really think the wings depicted in the video could provide enough lift to get this thing even one inch off the ground?!

[@greeksurferdude]

nuclear power bruhhhhh trust me bro oooooo

[@وجديسلطان-خ3ن]

Don't you understand what he's talking about? It's nuclear energy

[@thespatulaa]

@André Carvalho 😂😂

[@TwinsenR]

Of course some people would think this was real. 😆

[@charliequaker5487]

They'd be better off making it like a giant drone, but that would still be very tough to lift. This aircraft is absolutely massive! How would they even land it at a normal airport?

[@Squarabh2]

You missed the landing part, it doesn't land 😂

[@SLE14]

This sounds like a copy of a Cruise ship but I would rather take a cruise ship bc if it sinks u can swim, but if that plane gos down u can’t fly Like if u actually read it all 👇

[@brianhann573]

How fast would this beast need to fly in order to create enough lift to keep it aloft? But more importantly, why would anyone want an airplane that doesn't take you anywhere?

[@InsertCleverUsername]

It could fly as fast as it can and even then never fly, the wings wouldn't be able to create any lift.

[@sergevolkoff8650]

@@InsertCleverUsername You don't need any lift with 20 nuclear engines :) Even now there are models staying vertically in the air just because of single engine. They are models, of course, but still - if your engine is powerfull enough... :))

[@10054]

@@sergevolkoff8650 You're absolutely correct! But the energy demand of this vessel would be astronomical. Correction, this plane would fly for about.. 5 seconds before it'd need a refuel of trtitum for its fusion reactors. (Which is the most expensive fucking substance the world literally doesn't have to offer.)

[@swedishbloke]

“This nuclear powered aircraft uses fusion” that’s just called a fusion powered aircraft… nuclear FISSION, as in atoms dissasembling into smaller ones, is the only nuclear power we have been able to harness on a planet wide scale yet. Although there’s both EU and Chinese efforts to research Fusion technology, the kind of nuclear reaction that happens in stars. With the power issue aside, how would this ever take off? How would such a behemoth stay flying at a low enough speed for what looks like a 747 to air dock? Speaking of air docking, it was tested by the Americans several times througought history with the most recent, atleast theoretical one, being using a repurposed Boeing 747 as the carrier

[@ToneSherpa]

yeah.. they threw that in there because they knew nobody was ever going to get past the fact that they would be spending like $5000 per second with jet fuel

[@shahidaljahmi6121]

وبمثل هذا يفتخر المسلمون!

[@mayaabd1248]

To be honest I enjoyed watching this lol even though at the end of the video I was like but wait how is it suppose to take off and fly? Like this is huge... (I am a mechanical engineer by Training, so I understand some concepts) But every crazy idea starts somewhere and don't they say: " if you can dream, you can achieve it"... I am pretty sure the idea would evolve alot but u have a start here loll keeps us updated :)

[@ashitaka1337]

I guess if it can do all this stuff it may be as well just be able to vtol. Because why not...

[@largol33t1]

It would probably need a whole day to reach enough speed to lift off, LOL...

[@UmbertoFellinni]

Воздух - это не вода. Воздух не сможет поднять столь тяжелый самолет, какие бы двигатели там не стояли. Чтобы он взлетел, его крылья должны быть размером с небольшой город. То есть, это не больше, чем красивая фантастика. Этот самолет никогда не сможет летать в воздухе нашей планеты.

[@therealpro8481]

Me imagining!😏😏😏 Me rethinking:😄😄😄 Me really going:😱😱😱🥹🥹🥹🤯🤯🤯💀

[@xbxhkz]

So basically a modern Titanic in the sky. That thing would be a huge target for being shot down or skyjacked. Also, it's mechanical,meaning it requires maintenance to help keep it from falling out of the sky. How can you do this without it being grounded? It's a terrible idea.

[@markratajczak2489]

They send a plane to be docked to it and the mechanic boards this sky hotel.

[@vborovikov]

it's a genius idea because there's no icebergs in the sky

[@themightykv-5410]

Well at least the Titanic actually functioned properly and was actually feasible

[@howardtreesong4860]

Lisa, in this house we respect the laws of thermodynamics! To comfortably accommodate 5000 passengers you also need thousands of crew. However big that thing is it will never be big enough to be a living space for so many people AND also take off. Then, you have to land for some kind of emergency, and you will, and then there’s no airport that can accommodate this behemoth. If it could be built, and it can’t, I would want no part of it.

[@jh66444]

This thing is going to be the Titanic, the Hindenburg, and 9-11 all rolled into one

[@_Gilles_]

Realizable or not, the animation is stunning