Nullifying impact of Section 162 Cr.P.C. on statements made during investigation Justice V Ramkumar

[@anandshinde6707]

We are really appreciate the efforts taken by Adv.Vikas ,Adv.Shyam and Adv.Prem equally thankful to Justice Rajkumar Sir , Justice Nagmuth,Prof.Kaul and other speakers who impart knowledge through this platform.

[@ravikajagar9779]

Sir you are real gem of judiciary.. always good to hear from sir...Thank you Beyond law clc.

[@shashidhar15]

Your lectures are a boon for a remotely located student of law like me sir. You are a blessing

[@william_vai.123]

Acquire a lot of knowledge which is not found in law books. Excellent speech. One very important aspect of trial particularly criminal trial - this area of how to confront previous statement under section 145 IEA is well defined with examples. Thanks a lot.

[@arjunrekha1979]

Justice VRK Sir's session is as good as clearing the clouds - we are all proud to hear you again and again.

[@rehmatnazir6899]

Learnt alot from. Awesome! Honorable justice VRK

[@judgeshrikrishnadagliya6753]

Great lecture👌🏻🙏🏻

[@shekhartalashilkar7063]

Excellent lecture And Informative Discussion. Thank you very much Sir.

[@raghuraghu6041]

Sir We have to bow u r knowledge. 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏

[@riyansodhi2791]

Only word , "exceptional ".

[@advocatetajuddinchishty4815]

Very excellent video... Will boost up legal knowledge

[@suniljhawar6915]

(1) At the time of arguments against a Protest Petition filed by the complainant, Can Public Prosecutor use 161 CrPC statements to justify closure report forwarded by the IO? (2) How complainant can get the copy of all the statements recorded u/s 161 CrPC, 164 CrPC and replies to notices issued u/s 41 CrPC and u/s 91 CrPC? (3) Can complainant use the documents by police (u/s 161 CrPC, 164CrPC, 41 CrPC and 91 CrPC) to pursue his complaint as a Private Complaint? Thanks.

[@madhusudhan4745]

Namaste my best lordships, can we get it in notes, is it published me lordships

[@adv.ramneeksingh]

Very informative session 8.7.21

[@binodkumar-kx7ve]

Sir my kind submission is that under sec 162 only word has been used inquiry or trial in respect of any offence under investigation......and inquiry ends trial starts . Then under sec 227 record of the case is considered by court. It is contradictory or not . Question no 9 is not crystal clear. Kindly clarify any body please. Thank you sir

[@shahidsadiq1091]

👍👍❤️

[@rambv6993]

Contradiction

[@manojpandith3894]

Contradiction