Numbers in Chuvash

[@BulanGoldstein]

Cardinal numbers in Chuvash and modern Turkish. 1 - pĕrre, pĕr (in Turkish) bir 2 - ikkĕ, ikĕ, ik (in Turkish) iki 3 - vişşĕ, vişĕ, viş (in Turkish) üç 4 - tăvattă, tăvat (in Turkish) dört 5 - pillĕk, pilĕk (in Turkish) besh (pilĕk also means waist in Chuvash, in common Turkic bileg/bilek means wrist. So it means 5 form five fingers, but later other Turkic languages began to use besh as five except Chuvash) 6 - ulttă, ultă (in Turkish) alti 7 - şiccĕ, şicĕ (in Turkish) yedi 8 - sakkăr, sakăr (in Turkish) sekiz (Chuvash is an R Turkic language, it means they use "r" instead of "z" of Z Turkic languages) 9 - tăhhăr, tăhăr (in Turkish) dokuz (Chuvash is an R Turkic language, it means they use "r" instead of "z" of Z Turkic languages) 10 - vunnă, vun (in Turkish) on.

[@KotenOfCumania]

+Rage RAGE they are turkic they are sons of bulgar turks but they have a rare language

[@alexanderrossovitch2585]

Bulgars are not Turks.

[@BulanGoldstein]

+Сӑвар Кан Original Bulgars who founded the Bulgar Empire were a Turkic people like their relatives who founded Great Bulgaria. Since when Slavic and Iranian people worshipped to Tangra/Tengri? It does not matter that those original Bulgars are a dominant elite minority (maybe 15 to 20% percent of total population), they defeated the Roman Empire, they founded the Bulgar state and hundreds of years later assimilated in their non-Turkic subjects and left their name and mixed blood in modern Slavic speaking Bulgarians.

[@alexanderrossovitch2585]

Rage RAGE I said Bulgars were not Turks. I did not say they were Iranian or Slavic. They established the First Bulgarian Empire alongside the Slavs, and they had 10-20% Iranian (Sarmatian / Scythian / undefined) influences. Bulgars were Oghur Turkic. You are correct about anything else.

[@BulanGoldstein]

+Сӑвар Кан Thank you for your answer. You mean Bulgars are not Turks of Turkey I assume. Then yes, Modern Turks of Turkey not descendants of original Bulgars but relatives of them. As you should know there is two main dialects in Turkic languages: L-R and SH-Z dialects. For example the ox is "Okur" in L-R dialects but "Okuz' in SH-Z (or common Turkic) dialect. (Isn't the similarity of Oxus and Okuz/Okur interesting?) Like this Ogur and Oguz are both same words which means "Union of Tribes " but in L-R dialects it is Ogur with R consonant and in SH-Z dialects it is Oguz with z consonant instead of r consonant. Whatever, as you know there is biased claims about ethnicity of Bulgars and most of other Steppe people. After 1930's hoaxes (yes, they were all on purpose hoaxes not mistakes) created the myth of Iranian speaking Scythians, Sarmatians, Alans, etc. In most cases I ask just two questions: 1. If Scythians, Sarmatians, Alans, etc. were Iranian people there why there is no Kurgan and Kurgan culture, and an Iranian religion to support Kurgan burial tradition in Iran and India and in Iranian and Indo-Aryan people while Turkic people kept them even after Islam and many other religions until 20th century? 2. This is the most important thing: If Scythians, Cimmerians, Sarmatians, Alans etc. were Iranian people then this means at least two millennium so-called Iranian nomadic domination from Central Europe to China. Then why there is almost none Iranian borrowings and Iranisms in Slavic, Baltic, Germanic, etc. languages (except just a bunch of controversial words and modern borrowings via Turks)? How could this be possible after two millennium years of domination?

[@elshatshirin5567]

Thank you Katya. Спасибо Вам огромное за сохранение родного языка ! Tanri Turku assimilyasiyadan korusun, amin !

[@benja44444]

Thank you Katya, my wife is Chuvash, last month we visited Chuboksary, nice city!!

[@umutkiran3035]

Rakamlar Türkçe 🈴 Chuvash halkına selamlar 🇹🇷

[@AnatolyMironov]

I absolutely love it. I'll share this video to my friends to get them a very crash course into Chuvash. You are covering a lot of more stuff here not only the numbers: plural form, phonology, connections to other languages. Please keep going. Тавтапуç!

[@AlexandrGeffest]

Вот чего никогда не мог представить - что увижу уроки по чувашскому на английском) А интересно так) Нам в школе скучнее рассказывали) Ну и типа это, привет из Чувашии, где на улице еще можно встретить носителей этого языка)

[@scamperlol3330]

старей дальше...

[@daseqw6542]

Interestingly, some particular sounds in Chuvash turn into other particular sounds in Turkish. L > Sh R > Z A > U Ş > Y piL(lĕk) > beŞ Ulttă > Altı Şiccĕ > Jetti (in old Turkish) > Yedi sakkăR > sekiZ

[@hamoudhabibi1996]

No, L doesn't turn into the sound Sh, Pillek is basically Bilek(wrist in Turkish) cuz a wrist has 5 fingers, they used it instead of beş

[@cemasikoglu9597]

I'm the Tengri wowwww

[@shelpek]

Greetings from Kazakhstan! Long live Chuvash People! I hope one day Chuvash people become independent and create their own state!

[@againstviralmisinformation510]

I hope one day the Slavic people in Kazakhstan can become independent and create their own state

[@ereklechakvetadze4168]

I am Georgian and we have same condition when it comes to saying things in a collective set. Like In chuvash, if we say number before the object, the thing will be in a singular form. Doesn't matter how much is an amount

[@thommassful]

Greatings from Bulgaria. I know, years later, but yet greatings to Chuvash ppl.

[@ef3858]

It sounds like a Finn speaking in Turkic. Numbers in a majority of Turkic languages (Turkish, Azerbaijani, Tatar, Kazakh, Uyghur, Uzbek...) sound more or less similar but in Chuvashi, it`s something unic and unexpected for me :)

[@meralodem]

Im a Türk and I understand the numbers in other Turkic languages but Chuvash is waaaaay too different but it sounds waaaay too cool :D

[@guneskukuoglu3545]

Thank you very much! I am turkish but i live in Germany. I am interested in turkic languages. Good teaching! Greetings from Germany :-)

[@lesolea]

Хорошее произношение)) Good pronunciation! Nice job, Katya!))

[@54markl]

Attila the Hun spoke an R-Turkish language very similar to Chuvash. The Huns who survived the Battle of Nedao went to Wallachia and formed the Bulgars. Some Bulgars went to the Urals and formed the Chuvash people.

[@friedrichkass1644]

+54markl Chuvash name has no connection to ancient Bulgars! No Bulgar tribes carried a name Chuvash! Original Bulgars were: Onogur( ancestors of late Hungarians, which included the Magyar tribe!!) Kutrigur, Utrigur, Saragur and Ogur. All of them were under the rule of the Dulo Dynastie from which the Hunnish king Attila was descent! The name Chuvash is from the Xianbei/Sabir tribe, a proto-Mongolian group which lived east of the original Huns, the Xiongnu! The Bulgars has influenced the ancestors of the Chuvash, but the descendants of the Volga-Bulgars, who were mainly muslims got assimilated to the later Kipchak-speaking Tatars! So, it follows that ethnically the Kazan-Tatars are their direct descendants! The Huns got entirelly assimilated by Bulgars, Avars and Khazars! The last 2 people finally got absorbed into the Magyars/Hungarians! Bulgars and Magyars has every right to claim Hunnish heritage, as part of their oral tradition! The ancestors of the Xiongnu of Mongolia were the Xianyun/Cimmerians! They spoke an eastern-Iranian language of the Saka-Scythian type, which include the Sarmatians as well the Alans!

[@friedrichkass1644]

+54markl Beside, the majority opinion of Hungarians is that the Xiongnu were Scythian-related tribe!

[@blacksea-caspiansea9504]

+Friedrich Kass And scitians, Alans, sakas, also cimmerians have nothing to do with iranians.!

[@alexanderrossovitch2585]

Friedrich Kass - do you try to write and tell us about our own history? The Chuvash name originates from the 'Suvar' ethnonym. The Suvars, then Sabirs, were a group of Oghur Turkic people within the Bulgars after the disintegration of Old Great Bulgaria in Sarmatia. The Bulgars differentiated from the Kutrigurs, Utigurs, and other similar tribes. Attila's name in the Nominalia of Bulgarian Khans was Avitohol, although it is still debated if Attila is Avitohol. The strongest connection is with Irnik, Attila's third son. The Tabghach were a major clan within the Hsienpi (Xianbei), who were in fact the major proto-Tungusic tribe that defeated the Xiongnu (Hsiungnu) and destroyed the remnants. The Huns made up the far western portion of the Xiongnu, and they could be known as the sole survivors. I believe the Xiongnu were Ostyak (Yeniseian) or with a Yeniseian ruling class. The Bulgars who settled in the Volga Basin adopted two religions - Islam and Christianity. Those who adopted Christianity were the ancestors of the Chuvash, whereas those who adopted Islam were those who lived in eastern Volga Bulgaria, and are part of the makeup of Kazan Tatars, who are a mixture of Tatars (Kipchaks) from Mongolia and Islamic Volga Bulgars. The descendants of the Black Huns are Chuvash, Hungarians (not all Hungarians), Bulgarians (not all Bulgarians), and Balkars from Kabardin-Balkaria, whereas descendants of White Huns can be found in Turkmenistan (view the traditional dress to see the link between Turkmens and Chuvash).

[@blacksea-caspiansea9504]

Сӑвар Кан he doesn't even know singkle ethnology, stated everyone as gypso-iranian!

[@gezaember5541]

There are similarities between the grammar and the vocabulary of Hungarian and Chuvash. The Magyars came into contact with Oghuric people when they lived in the Volga-Ural region. Grammatical similarities between Hungarian and Chuvash: nap = day (noun); plural = napok két = two, but only used as counter before nouns kettő = two, but only used in place of a whole noun phrase or as a predicate, but not as a counter before nouns két nap = two days Common words in Hungarian and Chuvash: szél - śil - wind tükör - tĕkĕr - mirror sárga - šură - yellow disznó - sysna - pig The Hungarian vocabulary contains at least 500 words that are derived from Oghuric languages (Bulgar, Khazar, Chuvash).

[@papazataklaattiranimam]

Hello Turkic Sister🖐🖐🖐

[@yisonbin]

I'm Japanese, it is interesting that Chuvash is similar about correspondence k-g t-d etc. In Japanese language, these are thought that belong same group. So we write "g" as "K" with diacritic sign.

[@blacksea-caspiansea9504]

yisonbin Japanis belong to the Altaic?

[@yisonbin]

BlackSea - CaspianSea Previously Japanese was thought that belong to Ural-Altaic. But today, Japanese belongs to no group. It is classified to isolated language.

[@blacksea-caspiansea9504]

yisonbin But i heard that approximately 30% of japanis are Altaic words. Sorry i have a question, is Japanis agglutinative language or stem language?

[@yisonbin]

BlackSea - CaspianSea It's agglutinative language. ex; "taberu"="eat", tabe-nai (eat-no), =don't eat tabe-reba (eat-if), =if eat etc.

[@blacksea-caspiansea9504]

yisonbin Ok thanx ^_^

[@MrEmretti]

she is right. Gün = Day Günler = Days When we say 7 days we say Yedi ( 7 ) gün. so day stays at singular position just like japanese.

[@cete1905]

MrEmretti And like Hungarian also.

[@Ivan_Rebrov]

kun and kunzem - day, days. Not lar/ler, but sem/zem.

[@IdelUralState]

@@Ivan_Rebrov sem/zem is the Finno-Ugric influence. Very natural.

[@volgabolgaria7529]

Days in chuvash= kun-sem -Lar is the suffix of eastern turks -sem is the suffix of western turks

[@zalzide70]

Every single word is a treasure in a minority language, thank you!

[@bilgiguctur8317]

I wish you went on teaching us this pretty language!

[@andreieritcov240]

Katia, thanks, tavtapush, Good job! Just wanted to tell you that there is next way to count as well in Chivash for some numbers, very short ones, for1,2,3,4,6,7 and 10: per, ik, vish, tvat, ult, shich, vun.

[@АнатолийМихайлов-ы5я]

What happened? why is there only a few videos on channel? Саната чипер)

[@alejandroto3094]

Please teach more Chuvash.

[@MrsLawson-sz8hu]

I am Chuvash . I am glad that at Soviet time as all my friends, I was able to learn literate Russian, Chuvash, English, French languages and their history, literature, culture. RUSSIANS helped CHUVASH PEOPLE to make the written Cuvash alphabet. And it was Vladimir Lenin's father Ilya Nikolayevich Ulyanov, who promoted young chuvashes to get the Chuvash written language. Before that, the chuvash history, chuvash fairy- tailes, and chuvash songs were spreading from mouth to mouth. The Chuvash people feel very cosy and friendly in the large multinational family of people of all nations who live in Russia . Chuvash Republic has The Chuvash State University, where students study, Chuvash Literature, Chuvash History, Chuvash music, Chuvash Folk songs, and Dance. There is Chuvash Opera and Balet Theatre,The Chuvash Academy Drama Theatre, The Chuvash Theatre for Youth, and Children; the Chuvash Puppet Theatre, The Chuvash National Radio and Television , plenty of the Chuvash Newspapers and Magazines. THE chuvash language has been studied by pupils at schools and gymnasiums. There is The Chiluvash Stare National Symphony Orchestra, the Chuvash State National Song and Dance Ensemble, etc. PLENTY OF INDUSTRIAL ENTERPRISES. Plenty of State Musical and Art schools for children, Art museum, Art Gallery. Electo-technical colledge, Economi and Trade Institure, Institute of Art and Drama Culture. Pedagogic University. THE CHUVASHES occupy the 4th place in the population of Russia. So Chuvashes, Russians, Tatars, Ukrainians, Belarusian, Bashkirs, Mordovians, and people of many other nationalities live very happily and friendly with each other in the Chuvash Republic.❤

[@lunet1st488]

Is there a video to teach the alphabet? Looks interesting.

[@mehmetdursun8129]

I hope you record more new videos about Chuvash language. Thanks

[@alperenerkan5152]

Selam from Turkey. it was very helpful also learning about chuvash language awesome

[@BulanGoldstein]

It seems there is too many misinformation and disinformation about Bulgars and Ogurs. So some points should be considered. 1. Bulgar is not an ethnic term but a political one. It was a name of a political union which under royal paternal Dulo/Tele dynasty/clan contained many different Turkic people, also kyshthims (dependent tribes, not necessarily Turkic), and settled or hunter-gatherer non-Turkic tribes, etc. Also Kutrigur, Otrigur/Utigurs, etc. were not ethnic names but administrative divisions and terms. Kutrigur and Utrigurs literally means "the union (of tribes) at the behind" (means western wing of the state) and "the union at the front" (means eastern wing of the state), and contains different Turkic tribes in the union in different times. So we see the same Turkic tribes as members of Kutrigurs/Western Wing but in different political situation and borders as members of Otrigurs/Eastern Wing. For example western wing of Bulgar state become Avar's eastern wing. 2. Also Gur/Ogur is synonymous with Guz/Oguzh both means tribal union. But the union could contain both Z and R dialect speakers. We can count Qut/Gut/Got in the same semantic niche as same generic name that means tribes/union of tribes. 3. Chuvash people most probably is not direct descendants of Bulgars (means Turkic tribes who founded Bulgar states) ethnically but descendants of a mixture of Suar/Subars (Turkic) and Mari (Fin-Ugor). Turks due to strict exogamy created marital bonds with non-relative maternal tribes mostly. But the most important point is Chuvash was and is used to create and claim difference of Western Turks from the rest of Turks on purpose for political reasons. Literally they claim that ancient Turkic people of Eastern Europe were not Turks but different (somehow relative) people. The true descendants of Bulgars are Kazan Tatars and Balkar-Karachays, but we should not forget that there is no Bulgar (Turkic not Balkan Slavs) nation or Uygur nation, etc. Using Uygur as the name of Eastern Turkestan people is totally wrong. Until modern times people Eastern Turkestan was known as Turks (and sometimes as Eastern Turks) and spoke Turki language not Uygur language. In thirties Russians published an Azerbaijan dictionary as Turki language dictionary, later on they began to call the same people and language as Azeris/Azerbaijanis on purpose. They are not Azeri or Azerbaijanis but Turks and speak Turki. Now we lost Ulug Turkestan which was alive until 20th century and get modern -stans of Central Asia like Uzbekistan, Kazakhistan, etc. thanks to Russians and ourselves. 4. We do not know which Turkic dialect (Z dialect or R dialect) was dominant in ancient times, but it seems Turkic people changed to between or mixed both dialects easily. And we do not know the language of Atilla Huns. But it seems generally R dialect speakers lived in southern parts of the Turkic world and Z dialect speakers lived in the northern part of it. Most probable explanation about origin of Chuvash people is, they are descendants of Suar/Sabir/Subar which is an old southern Turkic tribe from Caucasus and (if they were the same people with Sumerians' Subars) Northern Mesopotamia mixed with Fin-Ogurs (Mari/Cheremis). But the subject needs systematic research obviously. 5. At the end most of the names of Turkic states come from generic names, administrative/political terms or from the name of leader tribe or union. So actually just the dominant tribe and according to its name, the name of the empire, state or union's names change. But the people were mostly the same, of course we should consider high mobility of Turkic people. 5. Just check the tamgas of Dulo (Which is assumed as Ogurs and spoke R Turkic) and Kayı tribe (which is assumed as Oghuz and spoke Z Turkic) and see both tamgas are same. It seems we need innumerable systematic researches about everything in Turkology. And it seems both Dulo and Kayı were descendants of ancient Tele/Tiele's.

[@BulanGoldstein]

So how could Chuvash speak an "archaic Turkic" language? You claim that Turkic people are latecomers in your "Volga Bulgar area", so how Chuvash people speak an archaic Turkic language? If Chuvash Turkicized, why do Chuvash people not speak a Turkic variant similar to other Turkic people languages? How could Chuvash and Mongolian have grammatical and lexical parallels? Did once a time Chuvash people move to Mongolia and gave them, or a part of the ancient Turkic people from West migrated up to Mongolia and gave those archaic Turkic features to Mongolian? While most of the Turkic languages evolved in time, Mongolian kept the archaic Turkic borrowings in their archaic forms and also isolated Chuvash kept the archaic forms of Turkic languages, at least L-R branch. Also, remember what I have written: "Chuvash people most probably are not direct descendants of Bulgars (means Turkic tribes who founded Bulgar states) ethnically but descendants of a mixture of Suar/Subars (Turkic) and Mari (Fin-Ugor)." About genetics, please check Lipka Tatars' genetics and compare it with Chuvash. Also be aware that genetics is not what you believe, it is not absolute, and also be aware of the interpretation of the data. If there are no methodical errors, data should be correct in its "context". But interpretation is a subjective matter. Let's check a recent paper: Ancestry and demography and descendants of Iron Age nomads of the Eurasian Steppe “During the 1st millennium before the Common Era (BCE), nomadic tribes associated with the Iron Age Scythian culture spread over the Eurasian Steppe, covering a territory of more than 3,500 km in breadth. To understand the demographic processes behind the spread of the Scythian culture, we analysed genomic data from eight individuals and a mitochondrial dataset of 96 individuals originating in eastern and western parts of the Eurasian Steppe. Genomic inference reveals that Scythians in the east and the west of the steppe zone can best be described as a mixture of Yamnaya-related ancestry and an East Asian component. Demographic modelling suggests independent origins for eastern and western groups with ongoing gene-flow between them, plausibly explaining the striking uniformity of their material culture. We also find evidence that significant gene-flow from east to west Eurasia must have occurred early during the Iron Age.” … “Our results show that the Iron Age groups-long believed to be connected through shared cultural artefacts associated with the classical Scythians of the North Pontic region-also share a genetic connection. This is supported by our ABC analyses revealing population continuity over the 1st millennium BCE in the eastern Scythians and low FST values between eastern and western Scythian groups. However, ABC analyses that evaluated different models for the origins of Scythian populations provided the strongest support for a multiregional origin, with eastern and western groups arising independently within their own regions. Despite separate origins and the enormous geographic separation, demographic modelling infers ongoing and substantial gene flow between eastern and western groups, which provides a plausible demographic mechanism to explain the low FST values and the general uniformity of the material culture of Scythians right across the Eurasian Steppe zone. Our genomic analyses reveal that western and eastern steppe inhabitants possess east Eurasian ancestry to varying degrees. In our ADMIXTURE analyses we find an East Asian ancestry component at K=15 in all Iron Age samples that has not been detected in preceding Bronze Age populations in either western or eastern parts of the Eurasian Steppe. Another ancestral component that is maximized in the north Siberian Nganasan population becomes visible from the 2nd millennium BCE onwards in the eastern steppe (Okunevo, Karasuk, Mezhovskaya). This component appears later in all Iron Age populations but with significantly higher levels in the eastern steppe zone than in the West. These findings are consistent with the appearance of east Eurasian mitochondrial lineages in the western Scythians during the Iron Age, and imply gene-flow or migration over the Eurasian Steppe belt carrying East Asian/North Siberian ancestry from the East to the West as far as the Don-Volga region in southern Russia. In general, gene-flow between eastern and western Eurasia seems to have been more intense during the Iron Age than in modern times, which is congruent with the view of the Iron Age populations of the Eurasian Steppe being highly mobile semi-nomadic horse-riding groups.” … to be continued

[@BulanGoldstein]

“All Iron Age individuals investigated in this study show genomic evidence for Caucasus hunter-gatherer and Eastern European hunter-gatherer ancestry. This is consistent with the idea that the blend of EHG and Caucasian elements in carriers of the Yamnaya culture was formed on the European steppe and exported into Central Asia and Siberia. All of our analyses support the hypothesis that the genetic composition of the Scythians can best be described as a mixture of Yamnaya-related ancestry and East Asian/north Siberian elements. Concerning the legacy of the Iron Age nomads, we find that modern human populations with a close genetic relationship to the Scythian groups are predominantly located in close geographic proximity to the sampled burial sites, suggesting a degree of population continuity through historical times. Contemporary descendants of western Scythian groups are found among various groups in the Caucasus and Central Asia, while similarities to eastern Scythian are found to be more widespread, but almost exclusively among Turkic language speaking (formerly) nomadic groups, particularly from the Kipchak branch of Turkic languages (Supplementary Note 1). The genealogical link between eastern Scythians and Turkic language speakers requires further investigation, particularly as the expansion of Turkic languages was thought to be much more recent-that is, sixth century CE onwards-and to have occurred through an elite expansion process. There are potentially many more demographic factors involved in the origins of Turkic language speakers, such as migration waves associated with Xiongnu, ancient Turkic or early Mongolian populations. The extent to which the eastern Scythians were involved in the early formation of Turkic speaking populations can be elucidated by future genomic studies on the historic periods following the Scythian times.” www.nature.com/articles/ncomms14615 Let’s check it! “…Genomic inference reveals that Scythians in the east and the west of the steppe zone can best be described as a mixture of Yamnaya-related ancestry and an East Asian component. … Our genomic analyses reveal that western and eastern steppe inhabitants possess east Eurasian ancestry to varying degrees. …appearance of east Eurasian mitochondrial lineages in the western Scythians during the Iron Age, …” So, Scythians in the east and the west were a mixture of Yamnaya-related ancestry and an East Asian component [mostly in mtDNA as we already saw in kurgan burials] like Turkic people. “…Demographic modelling suggests independent origins for eastern and western groups with ongoing gene-flow between them, plausibly explaining the striking uniformity of their material culture. … Our results show that the Iron Age groups-long believed to be connected through shared cultural artifacts associated with the classical Scythians of the North Pontic region-also share a genetic connection. This is supported by our ABC analyses revealing population continuity over the 1st millennium BCE in the eastern Scythians and low FST values between eastern and western Scythian groups. … Despite separate origins and the enormous geographic separation, demographic modelling infers ongoing and substantial gene flow between eastern and western groups, which provides a plausible demographic mechanism to explain the low FST values and the general uniformity of the material culture of Scythians right across the Eurasian Steppe zone.” So Scythians in the west and in the east had “strikingly uniform material culture” and connected not just with material culture but also with genetics. So western and eastern Scythians were the same people with the same culture. “All Iron Age individuals investigated in this study show genomic evidence for Caucasus hunter-gatherer and Eastern European hunter-gatherer ancestry. This is consistent with the idea that the blend of EHG and Caucasian elements in carriers of the Yamnaya culture was formed on the European steppe and exported into Central Asia and Siberia. All of our analyses support the hypothesis that the genetic composition of the Scythians can best be described as a mixture of Yamnaya-related ancestry and East Asian/north Siberian elements.” So the ultimate homeland of Scythians and their Turkic descendants is Ponto-Caspian steppes. “…similarities to eastern Scythian are found to be more widespread, but almost exclusively among Turkic language speaking (formerly) nomadic groups, particularly from the Kipchak branch of Turkic languages…” So Turkic people are the descendants of Scythian people and descendants of Scythians are “almost exclusively Turkic speaking people”. Now we can officially say that Turkic people were descendants of Scythians, at least of Eastern Scythians. While both Eastern and Western Scythians share genetic connection and also same material culture, there is no need to accept them as different people, so Western Scythians were also ancestors of Turkic people. It should be mentioned that we know predecessors of Scythians, Karasuk and Andronovo cultures contain significant (>5%) East Eurasian admixture in quite a few of the individuals. Now it is official, descendants of Scythians are (exclusively!) Turkic people. “The genealogical link between eastern Scythians and Turkic language speakers requires further investigation, particularly as the expansion of Turkic languages was thought to be much more recent-that is, sixth century CE onwards-and to have occurred through an elite expansion process. There are potentially many more demographic factors involved in the origins of Turkic language speakers, such as migration waves associated with Xiongnu, ancient Turkic or early Mongolian populations. The extent to which the eastern Scythians were involved in the early formation of Turkic speaking populations can be elucidated by future genomic studies on the historic periods following the Scythian times.” And this is the interpretation which contains just assumptions. Notice “the expansion of Turkic languages -was thought to be- much more recent”. “…was thought to be…” means it is just an assumption, not a fact. ... to be continued

[@BulanGoldstein]

Let's check Anatole Kylosov to see Turkic genetics: "...two excavated Khazar bone remains in the lower Don region in the south of Russia, ... both belonged to haplogroup R1a and its subclade Z93. The pattern could be considered typically “Turkic” ... Two human skeletons which were considered in this work, were obtained from two Khazar burial mounds in southern Russian steppes. The mounds, or kurgans, were typical Khazarian mounds surrounded by shallow square ritual ditches. ... Both burials, ... are located in the South-East of the Rostov region on the left bank of Don river, about 70 kilometers from each other. ... In both cases the Y-chromosomal haplogroup of the ancient Khazars was identified as R1a, and the primers specific to SNP mutations R1a-Z280 and R1a-Z93 revealed that the both samples showed negative Z280 and positive Z93 mutations. Thus, both ancient Khazars’ DNA was interpreted to be of the R1a-Z93 “signature”. This is a very rare SNP in present-day ethnic Russians, Ukrainians, Poles and other Slavic male populations, approximately 50% of whom are estimated to carry the R1a haplogroup. On the other hand, R1a-Z93 is very common in present-day Turkic-speaking peoples such as Caucasian Karachaevo-Balkars, also Tatars, Bashkirs, Kirgiz, and other populations who apparently descended from Scythians, and have their common ancestors in the R1a-Z93 subclade dated back to 1500 - 2500 years ago. ... Clearly, these two haplotypes are not closely related to each other, they likely represent two different tribes, albeit both carried in the Y-chromosome the R1a-Z93 haplogroup. This is not surprising, since subclade R1a-Z93 formed approximately 5000 years ago. This haplogroup was discovered in the ancient timber-grave archaeological culture, as well as in the Potapov, Sintashta, Andronovo, Karasuk and other archaeological cultures (Haak et al., 2015; Allentoft et al., 2015); in the present day Indians, particularly in the Indian upper castes (Sharma et al, 2009), among Karachaevo-Balkars, Bashkirs, Tatars, Pashtuns, Tajiks, Uzbeks, Kirgiz, and many other peoples (Klyosov & Saidov, 2015) with a high share of haplogroup R1a-Z93. ... The discovered subclades (R1a-Z93) and haplotypes from the two Khazar burials, one of early Khazar, and another of late Khazar times, are likely to be assigned to Turkic nomadic tribes, which migrated between Central Asia (and Altai region in particular) and the Black Sea area since the middle of the II millennium BC through the I millennium CE and some later. They belonged apparently to different tribes and different haplogroups (among them haplogroups C, G, Q, R1a, R1b), however, thus far only haplogroup R1a was discovered among ancient excavated DNA of the Scythians and related tribes (Haak et al., 2015; Allentoft et al., 2015). This study describes ancient R1a haplogroup in two Khazar skeletons, dated about 1200 and 1300 years before present (earlier and later Khazars) though the two belonged to rather distant DNA lineages, with their common ancestor who lived some 1500 - 2000 years before them. Both the Khazars (R1a-Z93) were unrelated to ancestors of the present day ethnic Russians, Ukrainians, Belarus, Poles, and other Slavic peoples of haplogroup R1a (predominant subclades are R1a-Z280 and R1a-M458; Rozhanskii & Klyosov, 2012), as well as Scandinavians of haplogroup R1a (the predominant subclade being R1a-Z284; ibid.). There are, however, many peoples with a rather large share of R1a-Z93, who speak Turkic languages, and who seem rather closely related to the DNA lineages of the excavated Khazars (some of them live in the Caucasus, some on the former Scythian and Khazar land, and in the area of Volga river, such as Tatars and Bashkirs." Klyosov, A. and Faleeva, T. (2017) Excavated DNA from Two Khazar Burials. Advances in Anthropology, 7, 17-21. doi: 10.4236/aa.2017.71002. Let's re-check what Kylosov write in paper: "...Turkic nomadic tribes, which migrated between Central Asia (and Altai region in particular) and the Black Sea area since the middle of the II millennium BC through the I millennium CE and some later. .." And you claim that "...Chuvash ... are the ones who lived in Volga Bulgar area for thousands of years before any Turkic even been there..." But Kylosov write Turkic people roaming all those lands for 4 thousand years (at least)!

[@BulanGoldstein]

Chuvash are not the Volga Bolgars, Bulgar is a political name, not an ethnic name. Do you believe everyone in a state or any political body were same ethnicity or same people? What do you mean by writing "...and even in Bulgaria people know that"? Do you mean modern Bulgaria? So how could regular people and peasants in Bulgaria know thousand years old history?! Is there thousand years old chronicles in Bulgaria and the people and peasants of Bulgaria could read the illusionary chronicles in the ancient Bulgar language in their schools?! Actually, Bulgars, Croats, etc. Balkan nationalists claim that the founders of their states were not Turkic people but Iranic. Read carefully "not Turkic but Iranic"! Why are they in need of saying "not Turkic"? The original Bulgars who founded the Bulgar state in Balkans worshipped to Tangra like other Turkic people who worshipped Tengri, Tenger, Tangri, etc. and Chuvash to Tura, coincidence? Does modern Bulgars worship Tangra? But Turks of Turkey still call God as "Tanri" today. About Turkic people were from Far Eastern Asia false claims. The main argument is the Altaic Language Family theory which is obsolete today. The problem is like most people you "believe" that Turkic homeland is in the Far East and Turkic languages are relatives of Mongolian and Tungusic. Altaic Language Family is an obsolete theory. Turkic Urheimat is Ponto-Caspian steppes. Mongolian, Tungusic, Japanese, Korean, etc. so-called Altaic languages have nothing to do with Turkic languages except for heavy Turkic influence since Bronze age (also some re-borrowings and borrowings from Mongolian into some Turkic languages). See yourself if there is any similarity in so-called Altaic languages! Let's check the cardinal numbers of so-called Altaic languages: (ORDER from left to right) Proto-Mongolic - ProtoTungusic - Old Japanese - Korean - Proto-Turkic 1 *nikēn - ämün - pitö - hana - *bir 2 *koxar - zhör - puta - dul - *ėki 3 *gurbān - ilan - mi - set - *üč 4 *dörbēn - dügün - yö - net - *tȫrt 5 *tabūn - tuñga - itu - daseot - *bēš 6 *jirguxān - ñöngün - mu - yeoseot - *altï 7 *doluxān - nadan - nana - ilgop - *yeti 8 *na(y)imān - zhapkun - ya - yeodeol - *sekiz 9 *yersǖn - xüjägün - kökönö - ahop - *tokuz 10 *xarbān - zhuwan - töwo - yeol - *on Here is the obsolete Altaic Language Family. Check it yourself please and see if there is any similarity. And let's see why can not you and other people and the researchers see scientific researches about Turkic people and even the name Turk itself. Here is the explanation. "On 9 August 1944 the Central Committee VKP, the ruling party of the USSR, published an edict prohibiting "ancientization" of Turkic history. The edict was followed by a consecutive wave of mass arrests, imprisoning and killing of the intelligentsia, massive creation of replacement "scientists", and re-writing of history pages on an industrial scale. Combined with the concurrent wholesale deportation of indigenous populations to remote areas in Middle Asia and Siberia, the wipe-out of the science was nearly complete, and the impact of the action subsided only partially in the newly independent countries after the collapse of the USSR. In the two decades after the Bolshevik's assuming power, the tradition of Turkological studies in Russia and dependent countries was practically wiped out. On the other hand, this edict brought unintended benefits to Turkology. One was the nearly immediate linguistic development of an alternate lexicon which replaced the nouns and adjectives containing the word "Türk" by a wealth of euphemisms: "nomads, Siberians, Paleosiberians, Middle Asians, Scythians, Altaians, Tuvians", etc. that filled scientific publications. The other was "writing into a drawer", when results of the years of fruitful work were written down for future publication. ... With the physical culling of the scholars from the society, concurrently was also organized a total extermination of all their published and unpublished works, their books were removed from the libraries and destroyed from private collections by intimidated population, articles and publications were culled, published photographs were retouched, private photographs were destroyed, published scientific references were erased, or publications with undesired references were destroyed. Very few of the early 20th century expedition diaries, ethnographical notes, reports and drafts for publications were ever recovered." "...Turkological studies in Russia and dependent countries was practically wiped out..."! Russia (USSR) and dependent countries contains the lands and history and pre-history of Turkic people, so by wiping out Turkology, and prohibiting the name Turk itself the Turkology died for a half century and after the collapse of USSR people and the scientist still are not aware why the name Turk absent in scientific publications (and why instead of Turk/Turkic many euphemisms: "nomads, Siberians, Paleosiberians, Middle Asians, Scythians, Altaians, Tuvians", etc. used) and it still keep going in this way. How could wiping out Turkology, killing intellectuals and scientists, and prohibiting the name Turk itself could bring any benefit!? Now Turkology is a terra incognita! Turkology was frozen in 1920's, and how can we bring it to the 21th century? Russia (USSR) and dependent countries contains the lands and history and pre-history of Turkic people, and this means Western scientists did not have a chance to study in Turkology, thanks to iron curtain and cold war. Actually, the process began in 1920's, (also in Russian Empire of 17th century who needs an official history). A new official history created which falsely claims that Turkic people are latecomers and they come with the Mongol invasion in 13th century. Even before that and even still Slavic histography ignore Huns, Avars, Bulgars, Khazars, etc. etc. innumerable Turkic people or in some cases use one or two pages just to show that those Turkic people had no influence over Slavic people (while Turkic people were rulers of them)! And based upon this false official history and falsely accusing to incorporated with Nazis, many of those people exiled and perished and lost their lands anlives. Please explain yourself if Turks were not the ancient people of the land then why the Central Committee VKP, the ruling party of the USSR, published an edict prohibiting "ancientization" (Sic!) of Turkic history in the middle of WW2? Is it the most important thing in the middle of WW2, in the middle of the war for survival? BTW you have written "Tatar are invaders who made the Bolgars leave the Volga." First of all after prohibiting the name Turk, Turks of Central Asia and Eastern Europe become Bashkirs, Volga Tatars, Crimean Tatars, Kazakhs, Uzbeks, Uyghurs, Azerbaijanis, etc. etc. But in late 1930's Russian Academy published a Turki-Russian dictionary, not an Azerbaijanis-Russian dictionary. Until 1920-30's Turks of Eastern Turkestan was called (also in scientific publications) as Turks or Eastern Turks, and their language was called Turki or Eastern Turki. But thanks to Russians those Turks began to use Uyghur as their name! Innumerable examples could be written, but these are enough to grasp the facts.

[@BulanGoldstein]

You should read again what I have been quoted! According to recent genetics paper about the relation between Western and Eastern Scythians and about the descendants of Scythians, the descendants of Scythians (at least Eastern ones but according to paper Eastern and Western Scythians were the same people) were "exclusively" Turkic speaking people! Now it is official that Turkic people are descendants of Scythians. Do not believe Abaev and Miller's "hoax" which has nothing to do with science as Abaev confessed. Period. “…similarities to eastern Scythian are found to be more widespread, but almost exclusively among Turkic language speaking (formerly) nomadic groups, particularly from the Kipchak branch of Turkic languages…” Also, same paper expressed that both Eastern and Western Scythians were same people and both had some Eastern Asian mtDNA but Eastern Scythians carried a little more Eastern Asian mixture. And this explains the same culture of both Western and Eastern Scythians. So, in short, both Western and Eastern Scythians were same people. And Turkic people are descendants of Scythians. Read the quotation again or the original paper, please. You do not read but carelessly write your own biased opinion and do not answer my comments. You do not know even the basics. You do not know that Chuvash and Ogur Turkic borrowings in Hungarian has same archaic features with Mongolian. Because all these languages kept these archaic features while other Turkic languages kept evolving and changing. In short archaic Turkic people who gave those archaic borrowings to Mongolian people spoke this archaic Turkic in archaic times and Chuvash kept them. According to your chart, Chuvash people around 25% Finno-Oguric people, not mostly! Those papers "suggest that the Chuvash are not related to the Altai and Mongolia along their maternal line..." but interestingly "Later, the assertion H, U, and K are "absent in Altaic or Mongolian populations" turned into "virtually absent in Altaic or Mongolian populations.The MtDNA gene pool was found to be 89.1% Caucasoid, 9.1% East Asian and 1.8% unidentified." It means Chuvash people has less Eastern Asian maternal ancestry than their other Turkic neighbours but they have it like other Turkic people. And if you read quotations in my comments, you should see that Scythians were Europoid people with some Esatern Asian mixture like Chuvash and other Turkic people. Similarly Turks of Turkey has around 13% percent Eastern and Central Asian ancestry, but interestingly no one could find a single written record about assimilation of local people and even at the begining of the 20th century Turkey has over 40% non-Turk population. Assuming Turkic people as Mongoloid is total bullsh..t, and nowadays the new theory in European academic circles is that Turkic people were Indo-European people in fact but later they have adopted Turkic languages if you believe such a nonsense. The fact is, famous Kurgan cultures in Eastern Europe, Ponto-caspian steppes were ancestors of Turkic people. This is why Turkic people are descendants of Scythians according to genetics, this is why Turkic people have strong steppe component in their genetics, and this is why Turkic people had Kurgan culture up to 20th century. Ogur and Oguz are the same word, in Z turkic it is Oguz but in R Turkic it is Ogur, like R Turkic Ökör (Hungarian) and Z Turkic Öküz (Turkish) both means ox. (Isn't it interesting similarity between Turkic Öküz and Ox/Oxus?) You confuse Ugor and Ogur, please learn the difference! (Actually both Ogur and Ugor should have come from same origin which has nothing to do with hunter-gatherer Finno-Ugoric people. You have written that "You want to tell me who I am? You mean that my grandparents lied to me when they told stories about Tatar invasion?" You, your grandparents, or any ordinary people, etc. could not know ancient history, only tales. In my family, if someone eats too fast, then we ask him "Are Tatars chasing him?" This is a relic of Genghisid conquest/invasions and most probably my family is the descendant of people who run away from Mongolian armies, and while running you should eat fast! Maybe you think I should have hate Genghis and his armies because of this and invasions, but in fact, at least 6/7 of Genghisid armies consisted of Turkic people. Both Genghis (Royal name) and Timuchin are Turkic names. Timuchin (or Timurchin) means blacksmith and in Chuvash, it is тимĕрçĕ / Timĕrchĕ similar in many other Turkic languages. Coincidence? And Genghis, (modern transliteration) means "Sea", it comes from Turkic Tenghiz, and you surely know it is тинĕс / Tinĕs in Chuvash language. Coincidence? I have written cardinal numbers in Chuvash and modern Turkish, because all of them have common origins and very similar, and the cardinal numbers are good indicators of language relations. You have written that "I do know quite a lot of Finno-Ougric words in Chuvash language that do not exist in other Turkic languages." and still manage to ignore all the other innumerable Turkic words which is the rest of the Chuvash vocabulary common with other Turkic languages. BTW, Tatar is a Turkic word but it means in Turkic languages "foreigner (people)" and Tat means foreigner. You have written that "Most important word, by my opinion, "love", in Chuvash language has Finnic roots, many important words in our language are not Turkic, at least nothing in common with Oghuz Turks." You mean юрату / jura'du but still manage to ignore сав / sav (love) in Chuvash, sav/sev means to love and for example sevgi means love and sev(-mek) means to love in Turkish which is a Oghuz language. You have written that "And good, because you are barbarian invaders who destroyed our great Bolghar, we do not need such 'brothers'." Great Bulgaria is not destroyed but was changed the ruling dynasty, but people were the same people. You have written that "A day will come, and we will make Istanbul burn like we did when it was Greek, then you will know who we are, the great ancestors of the Huns." Huns did not conquer/invade the Constantinopolis which was the capital of Roman Empire whose emperors spoke Latin, but the city was conquered by another Turkic people later. Please, you should not throw empty threats to your Turkic brothers! Trying to threaten Turks with war is just ridiculous. Also Istanbul has more then 15 million population, which is almost 8 fold than total Chuvash population. But we do not want to fight with our brothers, and a Semitic religion is not what you are. Seriously Atila, you should read my comments and quotations in my comments again! Lies, hoaxes, propaganda, assumptions, political agendas, etc. do not make you know the truth!

[@cemasikoglu9597]

Cuvash people and language has to be protected they our unique part Greeting from Turkey -and i regret the fact that i had to write this in English :(((

[@hulaguhan17]

Same grammer like all Turkisc langauges, We do not say 7 days - we say 7 day:) also numbers are same but Chuvash is really interesting Turkic family langauge it is so different for others..( pronounce words etc )

[@bkemer9807]

hey thats a great channel! please do more videos and explain us the culture and language more.

[@TUNC66]

In turkish,bir,iki,uc,dört,bes,alti,yedi,sekiz,dokuz,on.

[@мухаммадрезааббасов]

TUNC66 in kazakhs nomver bir eki ush tort besh olti jeti seks togz on

[@anrannoyan3153]

mediiskit Oghuzic Turks havent slanted eyes since Gokturk and chinese described themselv as blond hair and blue eyes.

[@anrannoyan3153]

mediiskit Fuck med and kurdistan

[@anrannoyan3153]

mediiskit Yes yes they learned Turkic language with e mail

[@turkmenc.c.c1279]

İncredible, its almost the same.

[@martonjuhasz1544]

We don't say the plural form either in Hungarian. I wonder if there is any connection between Oghur and Ugric languages. In Hungarian Ugric is ugor, and Oghur is ogur. The names are misleading. Either way great video, thank you!

[@umutkiran3035]

İt is old Turkic Language.. Same Hunnic..

[@СергейКильдюшев-б6ю]

Это единственный древний язык сохранившихся , язык - хунну , язык сувар Великой Болгари ,, живой язык из которого произошли остальные языки , зная Суварский язык можно шифровать любые древние руины.

[@BB-rj8ln]

Very interesting. I wish i could travel to chuvasia

[@evren__okur]

Seven in Chuvash language is very similar to "shichi" in Japanese which also means seven :)

[@ryanchon8702]

Seven in Chuvash comes from Proto-Turkic. Japanese しち or shichi comes from Chinese. The similarity is coincidental

[@yelsavidaravskaja905]

Seitsemän is seven in Finnish (root seits) - I'd say the Chuvash word comes from Finnic influence

[@-SUM1-]

+Yelsä Vidaravskaja No it doesn't, but the Turkic and Uralic languages are related.

[@mehdibayramov9853]

Evren Okur İn Tuva Çedi Türkiş yedi

[@cagataysuhan]

@@ryanchon8702 considering the fact that early turks and ancestors clashed alot with chinese states and had some degree of "cultural exchange" in heir and language, this might not be that coincidental since the same applied for Japan. Japanese has some Chinese rooted words, as do Turkic languages, even "Istanbul Turkish"

[@raymondrinehart5957]

Who can I contact about getting a Chuvash Bible?

[@TUNC66]

I love this girl.

[@3ddevelopment979]

у тебя классное чувашское произношение, ты откуда в США переехала, из какого района Чувашии?

[@МарияГордеева-т1ъ]

Vitaly Nikitin она американка, не чувашка она. Приезжала специально учить язык

[@MCSBENZ]

are you alive why you dont share any video anymore ?

[@CTO5oo]

мило и забавно молодец!

[@ambidexag5357]

Where is the promised next video?

[@mergckv]

Pillek hahaha i love this language Pillek mean Oghuz language Hand. And hand have 5 finger i love them hahaha and other number is same. Oghuz language Kun is Kün jeti Kün mean 7 days

[@legenda3723]

Салам, хер ача,маттур, не все мой язык знают, даже сами чуваши, а тут ты учишь,это похвально, я сам скоро выучу свой язык)

[@bigashzheka9600]

Greetings from Kazakhstan. ..Russian Empire and Russia has destroyed Chuvash language

[@ВладимирМарков-ы8ъ]

не дождешься

[@ZOMBIEo07]

No they didnt. Stop talking bullshit.

[@anrannoyan3153]

And Turkic khanate

[@eliran9231]

and the Huns took my capital and razed my cities

[@anrannoyan3153]

eliran789 And the slavic fossils;I n 1937 Azerbaijani SSR census , the word “тюрок” (turk) was changed to “азербайджанец” (azerbaijani). In Soviet schoolbooks, the word turkic ethnicities (тюркские народы) was changed to tukiс-speaking ethnicities (тюркоязычне народы) In 1960s Russian ethnologist Lev Gumilyov wrote a series of books called “Old Turks”, where he claimed that Anatolian Turks, Azerbaijanis and Central Asian Turkmens (basically Oghuz Turks) are ethnicites of unknown origin, who just happen to speak Turkic languages. In 1930s many Azerbaijani and Central Asian poets were executed for the poetries, where they praised their Turic roots (most notably Husein Javid and Mikhail Mushvig).

[@slaytonhurstbourdon1630]

You're a great teacher!

[@ferim.4186]

the hungarian language use the also single form

[@ninavorobeva4927]

Awesome! Thanks!

[@ozpiroglu]

None of the Turkic languages use the plural form of the word when modified by a number higher than 1. Day=Gün, Days=Günler 4 days = 4 gün

[@nukhetyavuz]

r changed to z in turkish and other turkic languages... save chuvash by learning this endangered language🇹🇷♥️🧿

[@ferim.4186]

I am Hungarian a i understand one number.....

[@gokgirekizilcika]

+Feri M. which?

[@ferim.4186]

+Kül Tegin the two...

[@ferim.4186]

+Kül Tegin ikKE IN hUNGARIAN : KEt- KEttő...

[@kenansari5905]

me too.. number two ---> in Turkish iki

[@PaulLovesVarvara]

Feri M. Hungarian and Chuvash are completely unrelated. They have a relatively ordinary coincidental velar followed by a mid front vowel, one in initial position and the other in an intervocalic position. Hungarian is Uralic. Hungarian numbering matches other Uralic languages more thoroughly and regularly.

[@АндрейЯковлев-ю7б]

news - Hypar in Chuvash forest - Varman in Chuvash oak (tree) - Yuman in Chuvash

[@gokcekorgenvankyrgyz6200]

Андрей Яковлев varman=orman hypar=haber yuman=aach

[@utubekullanicisi]

"Haber" is Arabic though. I don't know if the Chuvash is.

[@gokcekorgenvankyrgyz6200]

KZbin Kullanıcısı ne diyorsun anlamafim

[@utubekullanicisi]

"Haber" kelimesinin Arapça olduğunu söyledim kardeşim. Çuvaşçadaki "hypar" öyle mi bilmiyorum ama.

[@gokcekorgenvankyrgyz6200]

KZbin Kullanıcısı herhalde hypar-haber ayni

[@stephanelafargue4709]

Hi are thé chuvash really turcs or à little mixed cause they prétend to be originated from sarmates or scytian Indo european? Thanks

[@ashinawolfkaranogai6754]

In my language Chuvash means take care or to keep something sacred.

[@umutkiran3035]

Soyadınızdan belli .. Karanogay

[@gokhanemre58]

Oghur is Old Oghuz language group. Old Oghuz R>Z New Oghuz Oghur>Oghuz İkir>İkiz sekir>sekiz

[@The1Bozkurt1]

Atilla Demir atilla bise dicem eger cuvas dilinde Z harfi Rye dönüşüyor ise ingilizcedeki girl(kız) sozcugunun turkce olmasi geerekmezmi ? kız - Kır

[@mehdibayramov9853]

Kültegin Batyr Moğolcada da kalmış o Bizde Türkçede öz Moğolca Öör

[@mehdibayramov9853]

kaan korkmaz evet yaaa hakketen öyle kardeş

[@ВладимирМарков-ы8ъ]

ну да, ротацизм

[@2007Club]

Hey I am chuvash 😊👋

[@pascalheimbach861]

Can the S at the beginning of the word be pronounced Sh ? E.g. : shekkar for sekkar. Does Shemar mean something ? Thank you for your help.

[@almazchati4178]

Shemar maybe 'dirty' as in Kipçhak?

[@pascalheimbach861]

@@almazchati4178 Really, no kiding ? In hebrew shomer (shemar) means to supervise or watch. I found no similar word in osmanli, closer to Kipchak than Chuvash or Khazar

[@almazchati4178]

@@pascalheimbach861 There is no reason to kid. Shimir means dirty, 'shimir ayak' someone who does not like taking a bath, an insult. I don't know what it means in Chuvash or in other languages. Osmanlı dictionaries focus on the use of Arabic and Persian words, and not all the words they may have used, thus very incomplete. shmr is an unpopular Arabic name.

[@pascalheimbach861]

@@almazchati4178 Venti seems the translation for dirty in turkish. So, shimir ayak has the sense of dirty feet or legs. Samir, Shamir (evening gathering companion) sounds closer to Shemar (ward, vigil), arabic and hebraic belong both to semitic tongues and rather rare than unpopular.

[@almazchati4178]

@@pascalheimbach861 Are you tracing Khazarian influence? Words and sounds are so malleable, difficult to come to a conclusion, unless there is wider pattern.

[@furkantan250]

Very similar to turkish

[@serkanturkoglu6244]

in Turkish 1=Bir, 2=iki, 3=üç, 4=dört, 5=beş, 6=altı, 7=yedi, 8=sekiz, 9=dokuz(toghuz), 10=on. 1,2,6,9 in chuvash language are in common with Turkey,Turkish. but in other turkish dialects like Azerbaycan,Turkmenistan, yakutistan, uzbekistan, tajikistan, dagistan, kazakstan, turkmenistan or turkistan Turkish the other numbers could be the same. :)

[@ogmer11]

well, Chuvash is the only one Turkic language of Oghur group (like in Khazaria, Hunnic Empire, Bulgarian Danube Khanate and Volga Bulgaria)

[@arslanbalkarcik420]

the people of turkey are not related to the turkic people. turkey people are locals and others who adopted turkish language.

[@arslanbalkarcik420]

tigin bey hi, yes, i lived in turkey. the people of turkey are turkiczed people. the turkish identity was constructed in the 1930s. the aim was: replacing islam as unifiyng factor with a new element (nationalism/turkism). the people of turkey are descents of local people who converted to islam by turkmen rule. greeks, armenians, anatolians, laz, pontians, bosnians, albanians, arabs, kurds. those people form the people of turkey. only very few people are oghuz from central asia (yoruk people). turkey is a very nice country and nice people (but too much believing in turkism) regards

[@arslanbalkarcik420]

tigin bey balkar. you?

[@arslanbalkarcik420]

tigin bey are you realy turkic? or anatolian? many turks in turkey are bosnian or albanian, laz or greek. regards

[@ThirtySixOz]

So we gonna ignore how gorgeous she is?

[@mergckv]

in the past We are the huns(oghuz people attack many time huns and kokturk because oghuz be free) we migrated Çuvaş land and we are mixed again and speak same language. And we are says Ogyz(but in Çuvaş language y - z) but later you says ourselves Su al and later be Çuvaş. Esen bolsun Çuvaş halkına

[@zinabb.6884]

Miss you Катя :(

[@lesliefranklin1870]

Thanks for this video.

[@54markl]

The Silesians were among Attila's troops, and may have picked up a number.

[@papazataklaattiranimam]

Bulgar Turkic😍

[@krisztianwirsz3612]

it sounds finnish to me :D

[@julianfejzo4829]

Chuvash was heavily influenced by Mari, Mordvin and other Finno-Ugric languages on the region

[@kutalbey]

Sanki azıcık Türkçe azıcık Macarca ve Fince gibi geliyor kulağa

[@norecenn_yaw]

Chuvash language is the oldest Turkish language lived in the Chuvash language...

[@alexanderrossovitch2585]

The Chuvash language is a Turkic language, not a Turkish language, and it has never been spoken by Oghuz people.

[@alexanderrossovitch2585]

Peter Slavov Oghur*

[@mehdibayramov9853]

Купрат Хирешев Oğuz

[@norecenn_yaw]

Mehdi Bayramov oguz deilogur dur rotasizm zetasizm meselesi bizde , tokuz tonlarda tohur vb arastir biraz ayrica ogur ve oguz boylar demektir

[@mehdibayramov9853]

temür yalıg Çuvaşça öyrənmək isdiyirəm ama bir sözdük bulammadım qardaş siz bilirsizmi ? Çuvaşça necə öyrəniyim ?

[@taniagrig240]

А́сла́ та илемле́ Катя! Тавта пу́щ

[@misho9422]

In Bulgarian language ''chuvash'' means ''hearing''

[@К.Стоянов]

It's rather "you hear".

[@renatofigueiredo603]

Good, thanks.

[@umutkiran3035]

Çuvaş Language is old Turkic Language 🆗

[@allanhmelnitski978]

7 is almost like estonian "seitse"

[@mergckv]

sakkır in oghuz language sekiz

[@УПАҫури]

Красивая девушка 👍. Хитре хӗрача ку.

[@Gazzeölürken]

Sizi seviyorum Chuvash Kardeslerim!

[@AlexandrGeffest]

Еще подумал о том, что носителям английского языка делать нечего, вот они и изучают всякие разные языки) в то время весь остальной мир думает как бы им английским овладеть)

[@rizaakara]

short form number like Turkish and i understand .

[@jackwhitestripe7342]

amerikapiki = american girl?

[@sergeysorokin7866]

pik ˋе or in case of izafat (postpositional attributive group) "piki" means lady or beauty

[@ggc39]

Chuvash language old Turkish...

[@eroktartonga4032]

Türkiye'den sevgiler.

[@26blanco]

Interesting

[@serhatbedel3855]

Merhaba TURK katdesim.

[@dedekorkut38]

Turkish-- Bir (1), İki(2), Uch(3), Dört(4), Beş(5) Altı(6), Yedi(7), Sekiz(8), Dokuz(9), On(10),,,,,,,,

[@MCSBENZ]

***** burada olay yanlis almadan ibaret. Türk olmak Türkiye Türkü olmakla karistirildigindan dolayi millet usanmis durumda. Ama Cuvaslar da bir Türk kavmidir olay bu kadar basit

[@dedekorkut38]

Sen bir Türk Düşmanı Köpek olmalısın. Yoksa Türklere böyle saldırmazsın.

[@dedekorkut38]

truestory is a shameless enemy of TURKS.

[@dedekorkut38]

***** I think you may be Armenian or Mixed Armenian and Kurd. Kurds who mixed with Turks are our brothers. But Kurds mixed with Arabs and Armenians will never be friend of TURKS..

[@ltybcltybcjd5957]

Немножко по другому . когда показываете 1,2 и далее ,надо говорить пӗрре,а не перре ,таа же как и икӗ,а не ике. Буквы ӑ,ӗ звучат по другому ,чем а и е. И ,да,в чувашском языке нет буквы ж

[@ЛеонидМ-г8ш]

Биир 1 Икки 2 Үс 3 Түөрт 4 Биэс 5 Алта 6 Сэттэ 7 Аҕыс 8 Тоҕус 9 Уон 10 Саха тыла.

[@akifkazimli]

İn azerbaijani turkish (english letters); 1 - bir 2 - iki 3 - uch (üç) 4 - dord. (dörd) 5 - besh (beş) 6- alti 7-yeddi 8 - sekkiz (səkkiz) 9 - doqquz 10 - on

[@rumelia]

Hajra Turan. Türkçeye benzemiyor diyenler bir daha dinlesin.

[@Lipton3373]

Sounds like a finno ugric version of uzbek

[@ИванИванов-щ7щ9р]

Чуваши болгары по происхождению и "янычары" по названию. www.chuvash.org/blogs/comments/4583.html

[@ФёдорКулагин-ю8щ]

Пите лайох:) матур

[@ChuvashRu1798]

Лайăхах

[@54markl]

R-Turkish is different from Z-Turkish because it has an influence from the Mongolian language.

[@alexanderrossovitch2585]

Add this to the fact that Oghur languages exist well before Oghuz languages.

[@krisztianwirsz3612]

Hungarian is the same. If there is a number or other word to denote quantity (e.g. lot, few, etc.) before a noun we do not put the noun in plural.

[@eltunasadsoy4318]

Azərbaycan türkcəsindəki rəqəmlərin oxunuşuna qismən yaxındır

[@Александрпогодин-о4ю]

Very nice girl, Nina. But who needs it? For the English? I doubt.

[@ozkang654]

Almost same with nowadays Turkish i think i can learn chuvash İn 2-3 days 😁

[@delly41]

Yedi gun

[@neotrnty4717]

7 gun 7 kun

[@Alyush_]

:) Ничего не понял ,кроме цифр на чувашском

[@kaan_aksit]

I was expecting the language to be similar to Turkish. Only 1 and 2 is the same, rest is totally different. And somehow 3-10 sounds to me as if I am listening a Scandinavian language.

[@ayhanyilmaz9601]

Chuvash is an Oghuric Turkic language. Unlike other Turkic language all the ''z'' turns in ''r'' and all ''sh'' sound turns ''l'' so this is the reason why the numbers in chuvash is a little bir different then common Turkic. By knowing this rule you will be recognizing the words easier.

[@PlaymateGirl27]

+Kaan Akşit no its not only 1 and 2. listen again to 8,9 and 10.

[@deniz-qm1tu]

It's not totally different.