I am a lawyer and this is the first time I have seen this clip. the prosecutor's leading objection is a joke. You can ask leading questions on a cross examination.
@vayarre4 жыл бұрын
Quite so. And the same comment could be made in respect of the prosecutor's final objection, "Counsel is trying to impugn the witness." That must be a common aim in cross examination (and presumably a legitimate one, if there is supporting evidence for it.) Also, the prosecutor's objection, "Leading," is such an obvious error that it makes me think it was a fluffed line by the actress and that the line in the script was probably, "inadmissible prior bad acts." Otherwise, the defense counsel's response, "Goes to establishing his pattern of behaviour while inebriated," makes no sense. In any case, fiction is not required to be true to life or the law, and often isn't. On the other hand, subject to remembering the above limitation, you can sometimes learn law from legal dramas. I did not know what a Molineaux hearing was until I found the term after hearing it mentioned more than once in episodes of Law and Order, SVU. It is a New York legal term for a pre-trial hearing on admissibility into evidence of prior, uncharged crimes.
@emanueleciralli75594 жыл бұрын
The point of this scene is solely to show how much Annalise is hated by the tribunal. Even tho some of these objections are clearly wrong, the judge still sustains all of them because of annalise’s reputation.
@chelseafcrocks823 жыл бұрын
This show is pretty notorious for its lack of legal realism
@kingpin69893 жыл бұрын
Outside the scope is another joke since the witness mentioned the man who bumped into him during direct.
@chaossspy67233 жыл бұрын
@@emanueleciralli7559 ciao
@teniola93044 жыл бұрын
Whether she represents me or not Annalise Keating is freakin beautifully SCARY😬😬🥴.
@patrickaina23072 жыл бұрын
I wanna be her
@kingpin69893 жыл бұрын
You're allowed to ask leading questions during cross examination.
@ituleo6972 жыл бұрын
I knw nothing abt the law but in all this law dramas - they always object to a leading question either books have updated or something is differently wrong somewhere- N if thats the case wats the purpose of asking/crossing if ur going to give the witness answers by leading them 🙄 Anyway this is a drama series they can create their own laws - I’m here for the drama not for breaking of sections 2 of subsection 1
@kanaposratiovisuttipinate44703 жыл бұрын
I remember when I finish all the season all I’m saying to my friend was “objection” and “sustain” 😂😂😂
@noahyesa2 жыл бұрын
LMAO
@davidgaveston6543 жыл бұрын
I just wanna put duct tape to the other 'objection' lawyer
@sassygreen50244 жыл бұрын
Damn why cant we have another season
@victorrocha57552 жыл бұрын
'Cause Shondaland was a bitch and wanted more of boring ass Grey's Anatomy, instead of focusing for once on another show instead of Meredith
@mg.62542 жыл бұрын
@@victorrocha5755 Its just a damned show.calm down peopl youre quite the troubled individual using such language.
@jamesticknor11342 жыл бұрын
1:20 This objection would not be granted in court. "Objection! Offensive question!" Good grief!
@nancykeovongsa26615 жыл бұрын
wow Annalisa is good she can see right through the cline that Atwood coach him to stay stronge
@umarsyarif65352 жыл бұрын
Atwood, CEO of objection
@vambrossek37452 жыл бұрын
My favorable serie of all Times
@ajones3639 ай бұрын
Leading questions on cross examination are perfectly acceptable.
@nancykeovongsa26615 жыл бұрын
you can see it all in Conner Michael and Simon wow that was intens
@chaossspy67234 жыл бұрын
She could easily defeat thanos
@noahyesa2 жыл бұрын
Sustained
@xyliahvortex6613 жыл бұрын
Phoenix Wright: Finally a worthy opponent!
@Kitty83Miss Жыл бұрын
Loveee this serie so much
@emberskelly45242 жыл бұрын
The courts were all hating on Annalise, because she gets her convictions in ways, they don't think is just.
@nancykeovongsa26615 жыл бұрын
you can look at Conner wow
@user-lh7hb1ge7h11 ай бұрын
You can look on Conner face wow thats was intense
@augustipahbeeh2 жыл бұрын
New Years Day honey.
@jfuen37842 жыл бұрын
Is that the guy in Michaels videos??? \
@Singmetosleepmydear Жыл бұрын
What episode is this ?
@LiveAsDiva3 жыл бұрын
ADA Atwood kinda work it hard
@boredlawyer33823 жыл бұрын
This is really poorly written. For one thing, you are allowed to ask leading questions on cross-examination. That's Evidence 101.
@cameronpugh35863 жыл бұрын
I think this scene is intentionally written like this, to show how biased the court and the prosecution is against Annalise. Most of the questions she asks are perfectly permissible
@motjon2 жыл бұрын
I really do want to know how much research they did on these particular scenes
@victorrocha57552 жыл бұрын
She wasn't being able to do so because of her past actions and her recent reputation, hence why the Judge said "I'll be inclined to report this conduct to the bar" as if she was indeed wrong (In this specific situation)...
@victorrocha57552 жыл бұрын
@@motjon It's TV fictional drama people, get the damn over it
@mg.62542 жыл бұрын
@@victorrocha5755 You should get over it loser youre the one cursing.