Nice to see you both together, comparing the Panasonic and Olympus m43 gear together and not as rivals.
@ForsgardPeter5 жыл бұрын
Thank you for the comment.
@hot88s234 жыл бұрын
Cats and dogs living together.
@ScottishFuturesTrader5 жыл бұрын
Really enjoyed this one guys! You should do more videos together like this as good fun and makes a review more interesting as well.
@ForsgardPeter5 жыл бұрын
We are planning to more of these. Next one will be on Mattis channel.
@TivBoiMedia Жыл бұрын
I had so much fun watching you guys.
@Andy-pu2iv5 жыл бұрын
Good fun! Especially the size comparison of M4/3 to "Can(n)on" Ha!
@ForsgardPeter5 жыл бұрын
:D, thanks!
@zackbulatao5 жыл бұрын
I've been waiting for this to happen! Thank you for making this possible! Can't wait to see more content with both of you M43 gurus. :)
@ForsgardPeter5 жыл бұрын
Thank you.
@Mir11894 жыл бұрын
Hey guys. Now i own both of these lenses... The body i use it with is EM-5 Mk III so here is my experience. Both lenses have about same level of sharpness and allow about same detail, both are water and dustproof. Olympus 12-40 F2,8 PRO + is faster + bokeh is softer + allows to use Pro Capture + MF clutch - slightly front heavy on EM5 Mk III Panasonic Leica DG 12-60 F2.8-4.0 + Has 5x zoom + On M5 Mk III feels almost perfectly balanced + Autofocus is perfectly silent, and zoom is much more quieter - this might be interesting for video +- slightly more visible vignetting at 12mm +- 9 aperture blades, but has "onion ring" highlights +- Focal lenght above 50mm allows for softer bokeh even with F4.0. This also allows better compression - F2.8 goes down really fast when zooming in. on 25mm its F3.5. - If you carry your lenses with reverse mounted lens hood, this one is quite impractical as it blocks zoom ring Now... why to purchase both of these lenses... I already had Olympus 12-40mm for 5 years and it is my primary lens. The zoom range is very versatile, and allows to use it for almost any purpose. Bokeh isnt the smoothest, but for portraiture its sufficient. Initially i was looking only for a backup lens - in case 12-40 will need a repair. I could go for another 12-40 but, later i realized that i dont own any travel lens which would also (at least partially) cover for my Lumix G X 35-100. So Olympus 12-45 Pro and Lumix 12-35 were both out of consideration. In most situations i would prefer to carry my main camera bag with Olympus 12-40 F2.8 and Lumix G X 35-100 F2.8. This, including flash and spare batteries weights only 2kg. But in case i would be more limited, Leica 12-60 allows me to use smaller camera bag - one body, one lens, small flash at
@ForsgardPeter4 жыл бұрын
Thanks for sharing.
@yenaurapourtoulmonde4 жыл бұрын
I own both with my G9. With the M.Zuiko, I loose zooming range and lens IS, but I gain image sharpness and constant aperture. So I would say : it depends on what you're gonna shoot. Handheld and moving operator: Leica. Tripod and/or video: M.Zuiko.
@gregs41635 жыл бұрын
Great video I really enjoyed it Peter! loved the Finland facts, I really need to visit someday!
@ForsgardPeter5 жыл бұрын
Thank you!
@weixiong1.05 жыл бұрын
Nice and relaxing to see two guys having a good time with their toys.
@ForsgardPeter5 жыл бұрын
Thank you.
@BrightExposure Жыл бұрын
11:00 I prefer the compression of 60mm over the 40mm. But the Bokeh look equally good.
@liborkrupica56865 жыл бұрын
Hello Peter, good video. I started with the 12-40 and I love this lens. Now I switched to 12-100 and it become my the most universal travel lens. This one beats everything.
@swaha553 жыл бұрын
I have the GH5 with the Olympus M Zuiko 12 - 40 mm f2.8 Pro. But I have problems focusing with the 12mm focal length. I can get a sharp focus at 12mm when the subject is close to the lens ~ 1 ft or .5 - 1.0 meters but when I get more distant like 7 ft I cannot get a sharp focus at 12mm. The focus wants to be all the way to infinity but it is not sharp whether I focus closer or not - even if I line up the red focus line in the middle of the infinity symbol. However if I focus at infinity and zoom in just a little to 14mm everything is very sharp. I cannot figure out what the problem is. I have the GH5 set on Movie mode and manual focus. The firmware in GH5 and Olympus is up to date. Why would I not be able to get sharp focus at around 7 ft at 12mm but get sharp focus closer or with zoom out to 14mm? I have tried focusing with the focus ring slide back (linear focus like your said) and toward me (wire focus) but nothing is sharp at 12mm at a distance. Close up is fine. When I increase the f stop at 12mm it gets a bit sharper than 2.8 - 3.2 but not really sharp. I would really appreciate any help with this. It is driving me crazy and I have spent hours and hours watching videos and experimenting to try to figure this out.
@ForsgardPeter3 жыл бұрын
That is strange. Have you a possibility to test it with an Olympus camera? There might be some calibration problems. That is the only thing I can come up with.
@mikesch08155 жыл бұрын
I tried both lenses and decided to the 12-60mm. Optical there is not really a lot of difference, but I like Dual IS at Lumix and the 20mm at the upper end.
@snugsonblitz2 жыл бұрын
Loved those pics on your wall at 0:24 of a cat's ear. What lens were they taken with? Zuiko 60mm?
@ForsgardPeter2 жыл бұрын
Thanks. Those are old photos from the era I was using Canon. I had the Sigma 150mm f2.8 macro.
@veganbodybuilding5 жыл бұрын
I like the way you can have different brands, but still be ok about people differing in viewpoint. Most KZbin camera people are terribly partisan, it is their brand or no brand, but you guys have fun with your differences. It is a refreshing change, keep it up.
@ForsgardPeter5 жыл бұрын
Thank you.
@jrosedds425 жыл бұрын
Gasp! Gigantic typo at 3:55! Otherwise, enjoyed the video and, until now, never felt bad for buying the 12-40 separately when it was first introduced and all I had was the E-M5 and some primes.
@EricMustardman4 жыл бұрын
The Lumix lens wins hands down in the range of 41-60 mm focal length.
@alb41ful5 жыл бұрын
Your videos are very creative, enjoyable and educational! Thank you Peter!
@ForsgardPeter5 жыл бұрын
Thank you!
@Enrique-the-photographer5 жыл бұрын
Fun video, I am subscribed to both of your channels, there’s always something to learn from your content (and I’m a Fujifilm user).
@ForsgardPeter5 жыл бұрын
Thank you.
@doreangrey17123 жыл бұрын
Great video Peter Forsgard I always learn so much from watching your videos
@stephenfox51335 жыл бұрын
you guys work really well together, well done!!....nice to see you getting some sun Peter!
@ForsgardPeter5 жыл бұрын
Thanks.
@shahzadahmed-tq8tm5 жыл бұрын
Great Video Sir, as always! I have a question please guide me which lense should I buy for my OMD EM1 ii; Olpympus 75mm f1.8, Sigma 56 f1.4, or Olympus 40-150 f2.8? I am looking for portraits!(Although, I think 40-150 will be used in many more occasions). Will 40-150 f2.8 be good for portraits as well? Thank You for your time in advance!
@ForsgardPeter5 жыл бұрын
All of those lenses are great for portraits. I all comes down to what other uses you might have with the lens. The 75mm f1.8 is one of my favorite lens for portraits, but if you need more versatile lens I would consider the 40-150mm f2.8 lens.
@zardosspinosa69445 жыл бұрын
Of course the best portrait lenses will be the 1.2 primes. The 75mm is a great lens but really only suits head and shoulders unless you want to get well back from your subject. The other 1.8 prime lenses still do good job and I feel sharp enough and cheap enough to get both the 25mm and the 45mm and there is even a trend now to do environmental portrait shots with the 17mm focal length (35 equivalence).The 45mm is a real gem for its size and probably the one I use the most for portrait but then I found I was using the 25mm the other day to capture a bit more of the background. The 40-150 Pro is great as a portrait travel lens, but you often are tempted to over zoom in. I guess its a dilemma deciding what lenses to buy and most of us end up buying quite a few lenses over the years, and I am happy to report that I use nearly all. I would really like to get the 1.2 Pro, but really expensive and I cannot decide whether to get the 25mm or the 45mm as I really need both focal lengths. For the moment I am keeping my wallet in my pocket
@iraabramowitz60275 жыл бұрын
Thank you. How well does the Olympus lens auto-focus on the Panasonic body and the Panasonic lens on the Olympus body? Particularly the quality of auto-focus in tracking mode as well as in single shot. Thanks.
@ForsgardPeter5 жыл бұрын
We are working with Matti to make a video about using Panasonic lenses on an Olympus body and vice a versa.
@theosalah72024 жыл бұрын
Great idea because i was thinking of buying the Leica with an E-M1 III (extra reach with compact expert body).
@mondujar2795 жыл бұрын
Great video guys. I have a Lumix 12-60 on Olympus Em1 mk2, problem with understanding the Ibis. Do I need to set a focal length? I just use lens stabiliser at the moment
@ForsgardPeter5 жыл бұрын
You could turn off the stabilizer from the body and only use the stabilizer in the lens.
@tapptom10 ай бұрын
@@ForsgardPeterthe ibis stabilization is much better I think
@OlivierGad Жыл бұрын
Hello. You had fun by doing this video. That's cool :) thanks for it. Eventually, I guess that the only focal range difference or the opportunity to get one lens at the most decent price that would push for one or the other (lense). Or the lense we already own aside this lense... At usage, it seems to be quite similar.
@kevinkelly65248 күн бұрын
I really like the videos when you two collaborate and just shoot the breeze. This also is good info
@ForsgardPeter8 күн бұрын
Glad you enjoyed it.
@samham39012 жыл бұрын
Thanks ! Have a question please.. which of these lenses is right for Olympus e-m1 ?? Actually all Olympus lenses confused me!! I couldn't decide which lens is right for specific model !! Could you please give me a rule or some indicator that helps me picking the right lens according to Olympus models/ series.. thanks and best regards
@ForsgardPeter2 жыл бұрын
Every lens with MFT mount is ok with any Olympus with MFT mount. There are no specific lenses to a specific Olympus body.
@KiinaSu5 жыл бұрын
Funny, is have both lenses in front of me right now and I'm trying to decide which one to keep. Would've been interesting to see both on both bodies. To see if the Panasonic one focuses good on the Olympus body and the other way around. Or how much the Dual IS really helps.
@anupamsadhukhan5620 Жыл бұрын
Thanks for comparing these two lens and also thanks for your friendship lumix vs olympus.
@koljarzg11 ай бұрын
Fun and informative video. But the moment I saw MS Gabriella (13:44), the ship built at my hometown of Split, Croatia, the last one before the war, brought tears in my eyes. Exactly as I remember her. Thank you !
@ForsgardPeter11 ай бұрын
I think it is still in use between Helsinki and Stockholm.
@koljarzg10 ай бұрын
@@ForsgardPeter she's a beautiful ship. I hope she served you well over the years.
@millerdp5 жыл бұрын
Peter and Matti, great stuff! I’m a fan and I shoot with a bulky DSLR! I always learn something. Keep up the double exposures!
@ForsgardPeter5 жыл бұрын
Thanks.
@brianphuket59515 жыл бұрын
@@ForsgardPeter LOL! Peter and Matti in 30 years... fun show guys! enjoyed your humor, can't say it was a decisive "win" on the choice of 'better'. I have a G9, I use for video and stills, I understand the Oly is sharper and on a gimbal, you can't really use the IBIS. So, would that mean the win goes to 12-60? Because of the IBIS for handheld stills? I'm not really bias, maybe towards the money side of it. as the Oly is less money, not a lot, about as much as the difference is between the 40mm-60mm I suppose, your assistance on this question would be helpful. Cheers!
@AnandaSim5 жыл бұрын
If both of you are in front of the camera who is shooting the video? Some things of mild interest are which lens has more uncorrected curvilinear distortion and also color fringing. Plus if you fit the Panasonic lens on the Olympus body do you see a slow down in stills rapid burst rate?
@ForsgardPeter5 жыл бұрын
Most of our videos are done solo, but sometimes we help each other to film. On this one we used a cold camera, so no one was helping us film.
@soumyajit924 жыл бұрын
Hi, planning to dive into m43 world. Try to choose between em5 iii (14-150) , em1 ii (12-140 or 12-100 as kit), g9 (12-35 or 12-160 as kit) and the whatever kit lenses they offer as bundle since that will reduce my first lens price to the minimum. What do you suggest should i go with as my anchor point that i can build around with additional lenses later on. My priorities are full weather sealing, outdoor shooting and image quality. Which ll be the most worth it starter kit. Thank you.
@ForsgardPeter4 жыл бұрын
I would most likely get the E-M5 MKIII with the 14-150mm or E-M1 MKII with 12-100mm f4 depending on your budget.
@soumyajit924 жыл бұрын
@@ForsgardPeter thank you. problem is cant find 14-150 bundle offer anywhere. I'll try again once these tough times are over otherwise on a second though i'd have to go with em1ii since buying 14-150 separately doesn't make sense to me where i could get a bundled 12-40 for a little cheaper. Also i have one more question i know i shouldn't ask from an Olympus ambassador, do you think olympus lenses are worth the extra when it comes to weather sealing when comparing 35-100 and 40-150 ? Thank you once again.
@ForsgardPeter4 жыл бұрын
Thats true that the 14-150mm might not be bundled with the E-M5 MKIII. Then it is of course worth getting a combo that is sold. Weather sealing is something that might be needed when travelling. It is not necessary when the weather is good, but that is not always the case.
@hiresmusic5 жыл бұрын
BTW have you compared image distortion at wide angle with same aperture ? As I wrote before 12-60 has some.I curious if Olympus is better or not in this respect.
@sajjadal-lawati31335 жыл бұрын
Hi thanks for wonderful serious photography work which helps a lot a joyable to watch... In your video I saw some images on your wall.. If you have taken through olympos and processed it and printed at home.... Can you throw some light on the cycle of taking the image to processing it to the final pint one of these days please
@ForsgardPeter5 жыл бұрын
Those images are from 2006. Close ups of kittens ears. Printed on a glossy paper with Epson printer and mounted on a aluminium frame. It was done by a printing studio.
@JamesBoyer-plus4 жыл бұрын
Ha-ha, you two are great! Thanks for an entertaining comparison. Just so you know, my wife shoots Olympus and I shoot Lumix and we use the lenses from both brands interchangeably. (primes and zooms) That's part of the beauty of micro four thirds. :-)
@ForsgardPeter4 жыл бұрын
Thanks.
@flickmerauld98584 жыл бұрын
Thank you for this, it was informative and a lot of fun, especially as I just got the 12-40 used for a good price. It's also made me want to visit Finland. Just remember, boys, cannon or no cannon, size doesn't matter!
@ForsgardPeter4 жыл бұрын
Thanks.
@mikeosinski505 жыл бұрын
Fun video I liked it. Question the Lumix lens had built in stably function. If you use it on the Olympus EM1MARK2 body can you also use the lenes stabilization as well to add to the built in body?
@ForsgardPeter5 жыл бұрын
No, you cannot. If you have the 12-60mm lens, I suggest that you turn off the stabilizer in the body and use only the stabilizer in the lens.
@mikeosinski505 жыл бұрын
@@ForsgardPeter Thanks for the info..
@tapptom10 ай бұрын
@@ForsgardPeterwhy??? Isn’t the ibis stabilization better?
@NoomSuwinit5 жыл бұрын
Nice Video.What camera and lens that you record this video?
@ForsgardPeter5 жыл бұрын
Thanks. I think it was filmed with E-M1 MKII and 12-40mm f2.8.
@davef41634 жыл бұрын
Where can I buy your blue B Roll top love the slogan!
@garybrown97194 жыл бұрын
Can't wait to compare my daughter has the 12-40mm
@chuoibanana5 жыл бұрын
Hello, can we use Lens Panasonic H-ES12060E 12-60 F2.8-F4 for Camera OM10 Mark II? Thanks
@ForsgardPeter5 жыл бұрын
Yes, you can.
@rhiwderinraytube5 жыл бұрын
If you use the Leica lens on an Olympus - will the Image Stabilization still work?
@Serenoj695 жыл бұрын
Yes, but not the SyncIS. So it is either IBIS or OIS of the lens.
@AudioForCreativeMedia4 жыл бұрын
The best part is you two went for a beer after testing the gear. Nice way to end...
@ForsgardPeter4 жыл бұрын
Yes it was!
@edwin_ac5 жыл бұрын
On the portrait side by side, I think the Panasonic lens has a better image. I think it has a better bokeh. Maybe because of the longer focal length.
@WhoIsSerafin5 жыл бұрын
I bought my 12-40 separately when it first came out for the constant aperture. I didn’t like the recent new cameras from Olympus and went Panasonic but kept the Olympus lenses. I don’t use the 12-40 much in quite a while and basically live with the prime 25mm 1.8 on the G9.
@aengusmacnaughton13755 жыл бұрын
Don't forget that Panasonic/LUMIX offers two 12-60mm lenses. My G85 came with the non-Leica, "half-price" version -- 12-60mm f3.5-5.6 -- which has served me very well for photography and especially video.
@eco9-884 жыл бұрын
Nice comparison. Wish that you also exchange lens and use on your corresponding camera to see if there are any differences in quality output and usage features for a more in depth comparison between both brands of m43.
@ForsgardPeter4 жыл бұрын
True that swapping the lenses would have good.
@letni95063 жыл бұрын
I'm a panasonic bridge camera owner and looking for a new m43 camera. Love both your channels and enjoyed this collaboration. As much as I like my lumix I'm very tempted to try olympus. You guys make the decision hard because you both make good points about your preferred brand.
@smkunder15 жыл бұрын
That video was great fun, more please!
@ForsgardPeter5 жыл бұрын
Thanks. Yes, we are planning on doing more of these.
@moke13105 жыл бұрын
Want the 12-40mm but bought the 12-35 Pana before it was released. Then I bought the 12-60 as gives more range and becomes ideal for travel. And then Oly brought out the 12-100...… But the 12-60 Pana-Leica is a great lens on my EM1 MkII
@Bizon-q2u24 күн бұрын
In the end, which is better?
@ForsgardPeter23 күн бұрын
It is hard to say. I recommend using the same brand as the body.
@jasonhindle40545 жыл бұрын
Great video. I shoot mostly Olympus but have owned Panasonic cameras from time to time. Currently, I have the E-M1 mk II, Pen F and Panasonic GX9 (which is mostly used with the old 20mm F1.7). I like them all, but will refrain from offering a biased opinion towards either because I’m far more familiar with how Olympus does things. I own the 12-40 but would certainly enjoy the little extra reach of the Panasonic.
@protestagain5 жыл бұрын
To the funny part, why I bougt Metabones Speedbooster for Nikon F to m43. I have loads of Nikkor lenses, and one of them are the Mitakon 85/1.2. It's as sharp wide open as Canon 85/1.2, and used with Speedbooster, it will give a angel of view as a 60/0.85. It will blow your mind. If it's pitch black, and you cannot see anything, but with that stuff you can take a portrait photo ... and se the person.
@aengusmacnaughton13755 жыл бұрын
Yay! The Dynamic Duo!
@millerdp5 жыл бұрын
I agree. M 8/3!
@HappyGrl415 жыл бұрын
Nice video and photos plus the history of the place you photographed at were very interesting. I am one of the few people who did actually purchase the Olympus 12-40 f2.8 separately. I plan to check out Matti's channel as I now have a Pansonic G9 in addition to the Olympus OMD-E-M1. Thanks for doing the video.
@ForsgardPeter5 жыл бұрын
Matti has a lot of stuff about Panasonic. His channel is worth subscribing.
@donlodge12305 жыл бұрын
Peter - love your videos. You are also a great ambassador for your country. Have you done one specifically explaining image stabilisation? I am struggling to understand IBIS (camera?) and OIS (lens?). I have E-M1 ii and Lumix 12-60. Should I leave both on or switch the lens off? A video to explain why would be great. Apologies if you have already done one.
@ForsgardPeter5 жыл бұрын
Usually when using lenses from other brands turn the stabilizer off from the lens.
@pdmguru3 жыл бұрын
Really enjoyed the video, fun and informative. Great work guys. I particularly loved the joke (won't spoil it for others)...
@ThomasEisl.Photography5 жыл бұрын
Great - thanks Peter
@moruzx2 жыл бұрын
Great video. Thanks for the adventure :).
@ForsgardPeter2 жыл бұрын
Glad you enjoyed it!
@AhmadThabet-qw1kc4 жыл бұрын
Many Thanks for the review that you have made. An excellent all purpose Olympus PRO lens 12-40 mm, covering the range from wide angle 24 mm, passing by standard 50 mm and up to portrait 80 mm shooting. However; please make another dedicated review, for video shooting, using this magnificent lens showing its auto focus and stability.
@daysofgrace29343 жыл бұрын
Good video to watch, you should do more camera/lens swaps, so we get your take on Lumix gear and Matti's take on Oly gear like the 17 f1.8 vs 15mm f1.7, 45mm f1/2 vs 42mm f1.2 etc...
@haroldslomp90455 жыл бұрын
Great to see you together testing. I would like if you change lenses so you can see any differences oly with pana lenses and otherwise. Hop to see more videos together
@ForsgardPeter5 жыл бұрын
We are doing just that next. We are working on a video where we test how lenses work on the body of the other brand.
@dmphotouk4 жыл бұрын
Peter I was looking for Live ND Filter on the OMD! MKlll its not selectable. Can you help?
@ForsgardPeter4 жыл бұрын
You need to have the camera on Shutter priority or Manual. That could be the problem?
@Fullmetalmiah4 жыл бұрын
Hi can anyone tell me if the Panasonic Len IS sync with Olympus IBIS. I have a EM5 iii camera body?
@ForsgardPeter4 жыл бұрын
No it does not. Turn either the lens IS off or the IBIS Off.
@stehlealexander5 жыл бұрын
witch stabilization would you use on Olympus with the 12-60 ?
@ForsgardPeter5 жыл бұрын
Turn the stabilizer off from camera and use the stabilizer in the lens. Not sure what happens when you turn off the stabilizer fron the lens and leave it on in camera.
@stehlealexander5 жыл бұрын
Peter Forsgård thanks. I personaly thought it would reverse. Maybe a topic for a KZbin movie 😊
@sylvainhimmo5 жыл бұрын
That was fun video, pleasant to watch and instructive between 2 really kind friends! Few years ago, Panasonic was more centric for video and Olympus was the way to go for photography. But now both, the Lumix G9 and Olympus EM1 mark II can do very well in both fields. Funny fact is since Panasonic is more coming from the video side, their "Pro" lens are with variable aperture. The 12-35mm f2.8 or the 35-100mm f2.8 are not Panasonic "Pro" lens, more plastic feel. I just shoot this weekend a wedding with the 12-60mm f2.8-4 but I really wish I had the Olympus 12-40mm f2.8. That one stop is huge when taking photo in a room. The maximum shutter speed I could get at 60mm was 1/60 sec. If I had Olympus 12-40mm f2.8, I could had the shutter speed at 125 to freeze people while dancing. For video, the Olympus makes more sense as well. In my opinion, the extra reach you get from the 12-60mm f2.8-4 makes it a better street photography lens. But how does the 12-40mm f2.8 performs on Panasonic body with DfD focus technology? How does the 12-60mm performs on the EM1 mark II to acquire focus and film? How do theses lenses perform using Olympus lenses on Panasonic body using C-AF? How do theses lens perform using Panasonic/Leica lenses on Olympus body using C-AF? Any difference in colors or any focus hunting issues or photo/video degradation while mixing lenses from different manufacturers? How is the weather sealing performs while interchanging lenses from manufacturer? Overall, both are wonderful lens, hopefully they are fully compatible. Thank you so much for sharing this video!
@ForsgardPeter5 жыл бұрын
Maybe we will do a video where we swap the lenses.
@bradleyanderson2475 жыл бұрын
Pluses and minuses. Every system, every body, every lens... It's all about compromises. At times the constant f/2.8 aperture trumps the extra 20mm at the long end. And at times the extra 20mm at the long end trumps the constant aperture. For things like weddings and indoor events where light is a scarce resource, faster aperture is a real plus.
@petergulliver32254 жыл бұрын
Just out of interest. Were the the glasses you were drinking from pint glasses? Good video by the way.
@ForsgardPeter4 жыл бұрын
Yes, they were. Thanks.
@commo19673 жыл бұрын
I have booth lens and using with Lumix GX8 and GX9 booth lens are good but I think the best is .... Vitrox EF-M2 + Canon 17-40L F4 and Canon 24-105L F4 :)
@theosalah72024 жыл бұрын
The beers are like the lenses : it is a mater of taste ;-) Many thanks for this relaxed review !
@TheMarenches5 жыл бұрын
Besides the cameras, I noticed the beautiful jacket of your friend. Can you ask him the reference of this article?
@ForsgardPeter5 жыл бұрын
Yes, I will.
@camjphoto2 жыл бұрын
Micro four thirds to a cannon, that had me crying with laughter! Great video as I’ve been thinking of trading in my Leica 12-60 to Oly 12-40.
@AnastasTarpanov5 жыл бұрын
The weakest point of the m4/3 compatibility is that Olympus is not supporting Panasonic aperture ring and Panasonic is not supporting MF clutch. If they can extend it even with Dual IS support on different bodies and lenses combination it will be more than awesome! Otherwise, both are great lenses and Panasonic series of 2.8-4 lenses is very interested, very compact and with high quality. Especially the wide angle is very good because you can mount filters in front of it, this is something we are missing in Olympus line-up now.
@ForsgardPeter5 жыл бұрын
It would make things easier if those things were supported.
@ImpManiac2 жыл бұрын
😂 Great video! Lots of fun, which photography should always be. I have the Olympus 12-40mm f/2.8 PRO. But still I am considering the Panasonic Leica 12-60mm. Maybe some day... Paul 😎
@fellowcitizen5 жыл бұрын
Thanks! I'd love to see an episode with contrasting or complementary lenses for approaching subjects or topics - Like the MZ40-150mmF2.8(+MC20) and the VS10-25mmF1.7 For instance, you could co-ordinate or brainstorm different shots :)
@ForsgardPeter5 жыл бұрын
Good idea.
@falkgottschalk4 жыл бұрын
I want my 12-60/2.8-3.5 back from my old 4/3 E-5... yes, it works with MMF-3, but I would be happy if Olympus would redo that as a real mFT-lens... At all, nice compare, I'll keep my OM-D.
@tomerweiss49005 жыл бұрын
Perfect as always :-) Thanks Peter.
@kennygo83005 жыл бұрын
I've been a subscriber of yours for a while. I shoot with the Panasonic Lumix G85 instead of Olympus. I've found your tips to be useful as a direct crossover. I subscribed to Matti's channel today. Thanks for the link.
@ForsgardPeter5 жыл бұрын
Thank you.
@keithfarquhar98195 жыл бұрын
this is one of your best ones! your dead pan humour is excellent! oh , and the reviews of course are interesting
@ForsgardPeter5 жыл бұрын
Thanks.
@jennifergrainger24805 жыл бұрын
That was a fun video. I'd love a camera comparison.
@ForsgardPeter5 жыл бұрын
Thanks.
@kami-gun2 жыл бұрын
I have a E-M1 mark ii and I have both lens. For video I prefer the Panasonic for few reasons: -Parfocal -Zoom ring -60mm -weight feels more balanced I don't mind shooting f4 bc I'm using lights. If I wanted fast performance I have a lot of fast primes T1 / f1.4 The Oly is a nice lens but for video I give it to the Panny Leica
@michaels30034 жыл бұрын
Very enjoyable. You should do it more often.
@ForsgardPeter4 жыл бұрын
Yes, we should. Thanks.
@markbarnes96945 жыл бұрын
Peter, is the Lumix weather sealed? Important feature!
@PhoenixWright1015 жыл бұрын
I believe the camera is, and probably the lens too. Whether it is up to Olympus Pro levels I couldn't say.
@markbarnes96945 жыл бұрын
@@PhoenixWright101 I was able to look up the specs on the Lumix. It is splash proof & dust proof as well. Thanks!!
@PhoenixWright1015 жыл бұрын
@@markbarnes9694 You're welcome! ;)
@thebattiful5 жыл бұрын
Thank you for your great and funny video! I've been very happy about it, because I have wished for this "challenge" of you two. :D Each of your two channels is a pleasure, but you two are unbeatable together. You two made my day! :) I'm looking forward to your next videos! Together or alone. Both of you are very relaxed about what photography is all about. Very authentic and sympathetic! It was nice to see Suomenlinna again. Last time I was there, it was much colder ... it was in March with ice and snow. ;)
@ForsgardPeter5 жыл бұрын
One reason we did that because you mentioned it in the comments of both of our videos. Suomenlinna is a lot different during winter time.
@thebattiful5 жыл бұрын
@@ForsgardPeter Thank you very much :)
@MuwexTech5 жыл бұрын
Loved the video, you guys did really well, nice entertainment, some facts and humour. 6/5
@ForsgardPeter5 жыл бұрын
Thanks!
@DivisionStreetDrums5 жыл бұрын
Great Video, both seem great
@ForsgardPeter5 жыл бұрын
Thanks.
@yourtallness4 жыл бұрын
Would be interesting if you switched gear, to experience the other side (if your visionary / ambassador agreements allow it).
@ForsgardPeter4 жыл бұрын
We have had a plan to do that. No problem using different brand gear.
@RodolfoVanzini4 жыл бұрын
We like the couple of you!!! Fun, useful and interesting.
@ForsgardPeter4 жыл бұрын
Thank you! 😃
@blacksunapocalypse5 жыл бұрын
Just got a super good deal on a G85 with a 12-60(not the leica). Have an Em5 II with 12-40 right now and thinking of selling the olympus just to save money, more than anything. Not sure if I should keep the 12-40 or try to sell that and go for the leica to pair with the G85 :/ For an amateur like me, I'm thinking i'll not really notice the difference :P
@marcorenato18145 жыл бұрын
I'm deciding between those exact two setups (g85 with 12-60 non leica vs Em5 II with the 12-40 pro). Would you mind sharing your thoughts on the two and how they compare? The Olympus set can be bought for 799 GBP at the moment, which is a great deal which won't last long I think
@Royatias4 жыл бұрын
I bought from the panasonic guy an 12-40 2.8 olympus during xmas.
@barnseyb603119 күн бұрын
Great, fun, video ❤
@ForsgardPeter17 күн бұрын
Glad you enjoyed it.
@bestamerica5 жыл бұрын
' any camers = any videocameras are still problem with blur focuses and blur depth of fields
@ketr605 жыл бұрын
It's always nice to have choices. Not so long ago the question was whether four-thirds would survive as a system. I believe it has survived, albeit in the form of mft + FT lenses + adapters like the MMF-3 - which I use. So, nowadays even more choices. For me, it comes down (pretty much) to whether you use a Panasonic or an Oly body to start with. I have an Oly body, thus the 12-40 f2.8 is my choice. But I own both Panasonic and Pana-Leica lenses also have others, like Sigma. The video here (for which many thanks guys) is nice to watch but ultimately inconclusive for me - this is not a knock on the evident hard work put in. If this idea of brand-comparison videos is going to continue, I'll put in the suggestion that a comparison of both lenses here with the Oly 12-60 SWD would be interesting. The 12-60 SWD is not mft of course and it's relatively larger, but it's still a good lens and by no means obsolete as an option for many (like me). Id even say the Oly 50-200 SWD/non-SWD can - more or less - go head to head with competing mft options but that's a different story. A video comparing the 3 as purchase options would truly be 'visionary' - Cheers
@ForsgardPeter5 жыл бұрын
Interesting idea.
@MyVault4 жыл бұрын
Loved it. That was a nice comparison really a good one. What about considering lumixg85 for both stills as well as motion pictures as my first camera? Just subscribed.that joke about Canon 😆😆 Thanks kerala, Indiia
@PaulBawby5 жыл бұрын
Interesting video, loved the fun fact!
@ForsgardPeter5 жыл бұрын
Thanks.
@mikecoleridge89825 жыл бұрын
Thanks for this and other videos made with Matti Sulanto comparing Panasonic gear with that of Olympus. I started the M43 trail 10 years ago with the Panasonic GF1, Sold my Nikon D3 and lenses about 6 years ago and now use an E-M1 ii for Stills Photography and GH-5 mainly for Video. Along the way I have collected a good selection of the best lenses for both systems. So here’s the request (or opportunity or challenge)!! I still don’t have a comprehesive picture of what happens to image stabilisation when you use certain Panasonic glass on Olympus bodies and vice versa. There is so much conflicting advice on the web. As you and Matti offer a balanced view on the two systems how about making a definitive guide to cover this issue?
@ForsgardPeter5 жыл бұрын
We might cover that. I know that that question is asked a lot. Let's see what we can do and what lenses we can get hold of.
@peterosborne98025 жыл бұрын
Great vlog, you two definitely have a good routine going. Looking forward to seeing more, both camera's are very good and I think it's down to personal preference. Me I use a omd10 mk3 so it's the Olympus for me.
@ForsgardPeter5 жыл бұрын
Thank you.
@paulm81575 жыл бұрын
Fun vid and great fortress venue, Peter. Love the canon visual pun sprinkled throughout. Got a “bang” out of it 😂. Next time you guys do a lens comparison, how about switching cameras midway? That way we can see how well the lenses perform on different m4/3 bodies - speak to autofocus as well.
@ForsgardPeter5 жыл бұрын
That is a good idea and most likely we will do that.
@searam15 жыл бұрын
You two are hilarious! Great job!Sean
@ForsgardPeter5 жыл бұрын
Thank you.
@searam15 жыл бұрын
@@ForsgardPeter Thanks, Peter! I have followed you for a couple of years now! I learn alot!
@ForsgardPeter5 жыл бұрын
So you have follow me from the beginning! Thank you! 😃
@searam15 жыл бұрын
@@ForsgardPeter I think I have! I was adopted and recently found out I have Finnish ancestry. I hope I can visit your country and meet you one day. You have been a great help to me, so thank you! Oh, I live in Atlanta... Sean
@searam15 жыл бұрын
@@ForsgardPeter One last question, please. I had an OMD EM1 and sold it because I took the marketing bait about MP. I am thinking of an EM1 Mark ii. Is the 12-100 lens much larger than the 12-40? Thanks!
@guyjordan82015 жыл бұрын
Bokeh on the Lumix lens is more bubble like and the Oly is a little more diffuse but very similar. Nice collaboration and showcase of m43.