OMEGA is Better Than ROLEX - 10 Reasons Why Omega are as Good or Better Than ROLEX

OMEGA is Better Than ROLEX - 10 Reasons Why Omega are as Good or Better Than ROLEX
Please don't forget to like and subscribe if you liked this video its much appreciated and very helpful for the channel!!!
Music in this video - Acid Jazz by Kevin MacLeod is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license. creativecommons.org/licenses/...
If you would like to lend me your watch for review please email me at - @ [e-mail] OR hit me up on Instagram @ WatchChrisBlog
Instagram - watchchrisblog
Visit WatchChrisBlog.com
Below is a list of some of my Favorite watches available on Amazon -
Tissot Seastar 1000 blue/black dial Powermatic 80 - amzn.to/30hHnzx
Hamilton Khaki - amzn.to/2QpxyLr
Seiko Blumo SBDC033 - amzn.to/30iZB3G
Casio World Timer - amzn.to/30sxajj
Casio G-Shock DW9052-2 - amzn.to/2LEJB30
Silicone oil i used to mod my Casios - amzn.to/354xns7
SEIKO SBDC061 - amzn.to/2Nrmmvt
Special edition Seiko Turtle Save the Ocean - amzn.to/2OpBgST
Seiko SKX009 - amzn.to/30gGxmS
Seiko SNZH57 - amzn.to/353aZ2w
Seiko SRPE53 DressKX - amzn.to/2X92gw8
Tissot PRX in Black - amzn.to/3dAMEH0
Tissot Seastar 1000 - amzn.to/30hHnzx
Tissot Seastar 2000 - amzn.to/3hpZ1ry
Bulova Hack - amzn.to/3EkJbZd
Hamilton Khaki amzn.to/2QpxyLr
Casio World timer amzn.to/30sxajj
Casio G-Shock DW9052-2 - amzn.to/2LEJB30
SEIKO SBDC061 - amzn.to/3z8GfuC
Seiko SNZH57 - amzn.to/353aZ2w
Affiliate link to Undone watches - www.undone.com/?rfsn=4032770....
If you would like to support the channel here is a link to my Patreon - www.patreon.com/WatchChris
(***The above links are affiliate links. I am an Amazon, Associate. If you make a qualifying purchase, I am paid a small commission from Amazon.)

[@jimashley8405]

Omega watches are better because you can actually buy one without a lot of hassles and BS and without paying way too much.

[@PepeDeezNutz]

Nothing beats the 321 movement in the Speedmaster.

[@jimsteinway695]

I like the newer 9900 in the speedmaster racing

[@jmso786]

I don't think there's a universal "better" when it comes to Omega vs. Rolex. Both brands sell watches that are 1) well-built and designed 2) super accurate and 3) will last generations if properly maintained. There's only "better for you" as in which watch does an individual prefer and speaks to that person the most. Ultimately, the presence of both brands is a win for us since we have more choices.

[@trinity3422]

To me it’s not even about Omega going to the moon, it’s more about them being on a mission that saved astronaut’s lives in the Apollo 13 mission by timing 14 second burns with the Speedy. Great video sir! 💯 Edit: if Omega could slim down their case sizes they could be even more of a threat with the co-axial escapement.

[@majedalessa8376]

Rolex is better than Omega because 1- Their bracelets are better and iconic. They tapper and have a quick adjustment, i.e.. Jubilee, Oyster, President, Oysterflex, you just can't go wrong. 2- Their watch cases are slimmer, which make the watch wear better and make it suitable for more occasions. 3- Rolex movements are known to be a workhorse that last many years. Moreover, they are easy to service and loved by all watchmakers. Their current movements have a power reserve of 70 hours, an accuracy of -2/+2, and they beat at 4 Hz. Rolex recommends a 10-year service. 4- Rolex is more consistent with their models. Almost all models are iconic and can be known to people with little knowledge of watches such Submariner, Datejusts, and even Daytona. 5- Rolex remained more fathful to the swiss watch industry by maintaining most of their movements automatic when others, especially Omega, relied more on quartz movements, which cheapened the brand. 6- One word, the Sea. Submariner is the most iconic dive watch period. 7- Rolex always uses the best of materials, and they never made gold plated watches, which Omega kept prodcuing till the nineties. 8- Rolex watches have better resale value and are largely more collectible 9- Rolex is independent while Omega is part of the Swatch Conglomerate, which, as a result they tend to go along with the shareholders even if they are not 100% in agreement. 10- Rolex was a brand of choice they did not need to pay James Bond producers to make the actor wear a Rolex contrary to Omega. 11- Rolex is the number 1 swiss watch producer with over 1.2 million watches per year, and their watches are in high demand that are not readily available. Omega is ranked at number 3 after Cartier.

[@5amarillo5]

Rolex is more refined, Omega produces chunky watches.. Omega is not as desirable as Rolex, seasoned collectors or general public tend to gravitate towards Rolex. The Co-Axial does not provide significant improvement on function or style (same service time or less than Rolex, accuracy is the same, shorter power reserve, thick watches).

[@ALL-il1sw]

Thanks for the marketing update

[@goldencalf5144]

Solid points.

[@jimsteinway695]

I have three Rolex’s sub no date a batgirl GMT and my newest 22 Daytona ghost. I have a speedmaster racing. The Rolex’s movements are well developed but they aren’t as advanced as omega in my opinion. Rolex refines thing till they will work for ever. Omega pushes the envelope in movement development. Rolex has developed much better marketing Most of your points are just marketing not having to do anything with horological value. Like Rolex making the most watches. That’s just marketing not that they’re made the best

[@majedalessa8376]

@ALL-il1sw I collect both Omega and Rolex watches among others, but to say that Omega is better than Rolex is an over statement. However, I believe that Omega is closing the gap with some of their latest realeses.

[@TheWutang1995]

I own both and really like both brands. I think when comparing each brands watches to their counterpart I prefer Rolex in design by just a bit but my all time favorite watch is the speedmaster. Still have my fingers crossed for a 165.024 reissue from omega though. One of the best looking divers of all time imo. I gotta mention too I have had issues with my GMT master II's movement and have read quite a few people with similar issues on their 32 series movements. Haven't had a single problem with my speedmaster though.

[@Mega-zi7ys]

Omg you better not mention problems with rolex hahaha fanboys will gang up on you😂 Got both brands too...for me speedmaster professional #1 then submariner 5 digits #2. The modern rolex..nah

[@ALL-il1sw]

Bro, ssshhhhhh. Mentioning the Rolex problems is punishable by death

[@Mega-zi7ys]

@@ALL-il1sw 😆 that's why they're now wearing Tudor and walking fast and constantly moving their arms when standing still so ppl will think it's a Rolex!😆 Rolex is screwing them twice over indeed!😆

[@TheWutang1995]

@@Mega-zi7ys the fanboy mentality is really bad. Like I said before I really enjoy Rolex watches and even got mine at retail with a positive AD experience but the issues with 32 series movements should at least be addressed. I'm definitely with you on the 5 digit models though. Idc if it's a boring opinion I absolutely love the speedmaster and the submariner and would love to get a 14060 or 14060m. I just dig aluminum bezels. I get the pros of ceramic but I rarely wear my GMT due to the "bling" factor of the ceramic bezel

[@Mega-zi7ys]

@@TheWutang1995 yes agreed. The alum bezels have a whole lot of character. They're like the 57 Mercedes gullwing . Especially when they ghost, they exude old world elegance. The ceramics are too shiny ang blingy for me. They're just like modern plastic cars. 😂 I once mentioned this Rolex movement issue to Adrian Barker and said it's in the Rolex forum. He immediately dismissed it as a made up story. Wtf. I think it's because they're trying to protect their interests.. Afraid resale might go down and they're gonna lose money on them. It's that bad. I no longer wear mine. For me it's straight out speedmaster professional 3861 and hoping to get a 321. I've had enough of this fanboy mentality already. Rolex AD are actually friendly , we both have experiences with them . Problem actually are the many (not all but many) Rolex owners' attitudes. Heheh it's become so pardon my saying..crass. I see many too many feeling cocky whenever they're wearing modern rolex ....they have this attitude like I can afford it and you guys can't look. 🙄 Anyway best regards to you

[@SIZZO76]

I love OMEGA 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥

[@rctezluh42069]

My SeaMaster300Professional is so good i think i could stop here. Upvoted!!!!

[@aaronming8466]

Omega is a well kept secret in the industry, if Rolex collectors find out how great Omegas are, all of us will be subject to waitlists, and we not be able to get omegas at retail price anymore. For me, i have been a collector for over 20 years now, I own both Rolex and omegas, but the biggest difference I feel is in the purchasing experience. In omega, I have been treated like a VIP, entitled to get any watch I want, with an incredible experience. On the contrary, for Rolex, I practically had to suck up the my AD and practically beg the sales rep to sell me one of those gold Daytonas.

[@jimsteinway695]

I agree. I have 3 Rolex’s including my just added Daytona ghost white gold. I have a omega Speedmaster racing, and I think the movement in the omega is more advanced. I think the next will be a omega other side of the moon 😊 Plus you can walk in to the dealer and relax while buying without having to worry about not getting one

[@zillsburyy1]

HISTORY, INNOVATION, PRICE, STYLE, DESIGN, DEALERSHIP EXPERIENCE

[@cardinalj]

My biggest reason I do not wear rolex is because of the cyclops. I can't get past the look and i like a date.

[@Andrew-qe7np]

Same!! I have an OP and it’s the last Rolex I’ll ever own. I hate the protrusion on other models. My next watch is going to be Omega. Tired of playing the games with Rolex AD’s too

[@nedflanders3769]

Omega beats Rolex any day of the week and twice on Sunday! Better technology (co-axial escapement), higher certification standard (METAS), beautiful designs, build quality that’s at least on par with Rolex, exhibition case backs on many watches, not just one that is insanely expensive. NASA selected Omega after a battery of torture tests to go to the moon. Oh yeah, and you can actually buy them!

[@5amarillo5]

Tudor gets METAS... so not so hard. Co-axial only makes your watch thicker and with shorter power reserve. Rolex offers a longer service interval, longer power reserve, same or better accuracy readings than any co-axial. Unless you are talking about the 321, the rest of Speedmasters are just expensive NASA merch with subpar cam-lever escapements when most refined luxury chronograph use column-wheel escapements.

[@nedflanders3769]

@@5amarillo5 wrong wrong wrong wrong and wrong

[@5amarillo5]

@@nedflanders3769 Elaborate

[@miabeatz80]

​@@5amarillo5 have you seen the new speedy 57 they are slimmer than professional and have column wheel. 👌

[@5amarillo5]

@@miabeatz80 Slimmer for sure. Still thick at 13mm for a mechanical watch. The Daytona is 12.4mm thin being automatic and accounting for the rotor. That is part of their desirability, the refinement. For the fans of clear caseback, the 57 does not have much to show other than a big plate covering 85% of the movement.

[@micksumo]

My first luxury was the smp300 and its a fantastic watch which being able to buy 2 years ago was brilliant before the price hikes. I've recently acquired my first Rolex at rrp which is a brilliant watch. I genuinely wouldn't be comfortable with wearing a flashy Rolex sports watch in public. Both fantastic brands.

[@u.u.u9969]

I have a Sub & Moonwatch. That's all I will ever need

[@ozthegreater9320]

I personally prefer Omega. My grail watch is the No time to die 300m

[@simplyspecial69]

same

[@tyranelewis7763]

For Me the Omega Seamaster Professional with Grey dial and Blue accents on Steel Band and Blue Rubber Folding Clasp Band (not sold as much as other Omega dials) gives me everything both brands over Great looks, Accuracy, Magnetic protection from this high tech world we live in as well as safety. Best all round watch. Rolex does not make the large available quantities because they thrive off limited availability to justify their higher prices.

[@zillsburyy1]

me too chris. out of the 30+ watches in my collection i am proud that not one of them is a overrated rolex!

[@wyldwiisel9126]

It helps that you can actually buy an omega unlike a Rolex which you have to pay grey market prices if you want one

[@mkyhou1160]

I like Omega - but Rolex are better for 3 reasons, 1. More iconic designs (Omega has a few, like moo watch), 2. Slimmer cases (a lot of Omegas are too chunky), 3. Simpler more focused catalogue (a bit linked to 1.).

[@WatchChris]

Very good points, especially the last one, which I agree. It's kind of a positive and negative that Omega have so many watches

[@jimsteinway695]

I don’t agree. The reason Rolex is a slimmer case is because they never show their movements until the latest platinum Daytona. And you can have about 40 different Daytonas so I don’t think they have a slimmed down selection. And I have 3 Rolex’s (no date Sub, GMT batgirl, and Daytona ghost in white gold ) and one omega

[@ALL-il1sw]

If you need a slimmer watch, you could always purchase from Omega's ladies collection

[@miabeatz80]

Also the cage they have inside the case helping it be more antimagnetic cause it to be bigger. Nonetheless you should try on a few more models you might find something that wears better than the spec sheet would suggest.

[@mkyhou1160]

@@miabeatz80 I believe Omega use anti magnetic parts rather than iron cage. A good example for me is I tried on an Explorer 2. It’s a big watch (42m) but wears beautifully with a 12.5mm thickness. A Seamasrer at 42mm is 13.7, and it’s a much simpler movement (not a GMT). It makes a big difference, Rolex watches wear more elegant with comparable movements / specs, you get a sports watch and modern dress watch in one.

[@GrafZahl13]

OMEGA is a realy iconic brand with a realy huge heritage in History and innovation. You can also purchase watches wich are affordable till ultimate high end💪👍.

[@jonathanrobinson9208]

I agree, Furthermore, Rolex's marketing and choice of precious metals are what make them dangerous to wear as well. ❤

[@johndobbs300]

I own both omega and Rolex and I can agree that Omega at the very least is on par. Rolex is much better at marketing and creating an aura of prestige, nothing wrong with that but this does not mean better. I love both brands and think they both offer some great quality pieces

[@ofb7212]

If I chose to spend that much for a watch I could actually walk into a dealer and buy an Omega. Nuff said

[@cjsolarmusic]

Love and own a couple of both but definitely leaning more towards omega for being less flashy and actually being able to buy most models at retail. Also really like digging through all the limited editions Omega has done to find the hidden treasures that arent on everyones wrist. Was in Miami a few months back and saw a submariner on about 100 wrists over the course of the weekend which really just made it seem less special.

[@Mega-zi7ys]

Ahhh but you will constantly hear ppl (esp Americans) say rolex is exclusive.😂 Go to Asia (genuine ones) are as common as Toyotas as well. Submariner and DJ especially. Love omega speedmaster professional 3861 and 321. They're just so cool and understated.

[@trinity3422]

As much as I want to eventually rock a Sub I love my Seamaster Diver and I would rather be the one wearing that or my BB58 in the crowd. Lord knows I could’ve bought a Rolex by now but I love that both of them are more subtle and fly under the radar. I’d rather talk to someone who recognizes my SMP Diver or BB58 than someone who recognizes a Sub.

[@AcmeRocket]

I own several of both. Love both but Omega wins.

[@neilredmond1011]

I have the new sub and the new speedy , love both for different reasons but my £200 citizen eco drive GMT world time keeps better time than both of them 🤫

[@Mega-zi7ys]

For Omega it's the speedmaster professional line and seamaster/po/AQ line that I love.

[@anthonystevens8683]

I'm neutral on this. I've been fortunate to have had both. I would say go for the watch that works for you regardless of the name on the dial if you are going to wear it. If you're looking for a watch as an asset or something that may gain in value that is not intended to be worn then that's your choice and is fine as well. Personally I wear the watches that I have, they will get scratched and get the odd ding or worse but that is all part of the journey for me.

[@miabeatz80]

I'm glad you are wearing and enjoying your watches. It will be funny when people that buy Rolex as an asset go to sell their used watches and realize the dealer price and trade in price aren't always the same. That's why I say buy what you like and don't get hung up on watches solely that increase in value. Most dj and day dates don't increase but are awesome watches.

[@FRANKTMD]

PO in titanium vs SD43, I prefer the PO the white gold hands and numerals with the blue dial contrast look astonishing but I still appreciate the classic look of my SD. I bought the SD FOMO driven with worst case of buyers remorse and find it boring. Favorite watch is my Santos Chrono XL black bezel. With so many other watch brands to explore I doubt will buy another Rolex but will likely buy one or two other omegas.

[@heisenbergguy7772]

You’re on point!

[@marctavo5288]

First a good point for me is that both brands exits, I agree with you for almost all the points, I have both brands and I have to say that I almost always wear Omega, mainly for safety reasons. I don't like small watches so for me the sub and Daytona are too small, I went for sea dweller and sky dweller, for the speedy I went for vintage I have a 1969 pre moon watch and I love it. Also a way to go for a chrono and dive you have the sea master and PO chrono, not so many people talk about them but they are fantastic. Omega give you a lot of choice a lot of different materials (ceramic/titanium/tantalum......) they also offer some complications you can't find on any Rolex watches like tourbillon, and the stunning chrono chime .......

[@davidr2802]

I have both and love them both but I dont think Rolex need OEM aftermarket straps because their bracelets are damn good. That said, the Omega OEM Nato is fabulous (have it on a GS) and just got the Milanese bracelet from my planet ocean. Superb.

[@miabeatz80]

I own a few Omega's however I really do like the design of Rolex as well. I really got turned off by the fact that Rolex are virtually impossible to buy new from an AD. On the flip side Omega have plenty of gems and great customer service. However many of the grail models are limited editions. Even though you would have to buy some of these grey market at least you know there were only 1k made vs something like a Rolex Batman that 10k+ were made and are selling second hand for double.

[@reizabaleta752]

Excelente video Chris, este canal es de los pocos que hablan con franqueza acerca de las ventajas o desventajas de ciertas casas relojeras!

[@TheBimmer74]

I agree with all of your reasons. I could afford either brand and my choice is Omega Seamaster 300. The movement in this watch is superior and the design is amazing.

[@galatians22122]

I have owned a submariner and a sky dweller sold them both kept my Omega’s. Rolex movements are hard starters!

[@glenking6418]

Sub’s nicer than 300m, should twice the money Aqua Terra VS Datejust AT takes it. Own all 4

[@finesse49]

I prefer the aesthetic of most Rolex models and the movements from Omega. I own only one, a 5513 I've had from new (it was a gift). I don't plan to get another because I can't justify spending Rolex $$$ on any watch.

[@timothyekern8158]

Pretty much agree with the whole show 👍

[@HarrisLoops]

I think you’re spot on, but I still love my Rolexes.

[@joshuakaplan5726]

I agree that Omega is practically on par with Rolex. As you said, Rolex is king of marketing. I own the current Blue SMP300M and prefer it over the sub. I find most Rolex sport watches over-hyped. However there are certain Rolexes I do love more than omega. I'd take a DJ36 (fluted bezel, jubilee bracelet) over an AT (even tho I love the AT) because I find the DJ just more classic, timeless, iconic, and elegant. I'd take the explorer 2 over any omega GMTs since omega just tries to mesh their seamasters with a gmt function and it doesn't jive well. As for chronographs, I'd take the speedy over the daytona any day. Daytona is so overhyped it's ridiculous.

[@Mega-zi7ys]

Speedmaster 321 or even 3861 over modern Daytona anyday. Less flashy. The only Daytona that I like are the vintage pieces that don't look anything like the loud crass modern Daytona.

[@matakaji412]

Love Omega but Rolex is just better at keeping tolerances tight and produce watches with better dimensions.

[@alexsalvador3370]

Well, I have the Daytona and the new Speedy pro moonwatch, the chrono hand jumps when the crown/botton is pressed in the Speedy, never happens to my Daytona

[@rhsking05]

Is this guy related to KZbin personality and channel creator RGT85? Looks like they could be brothers, lol.

[@johnnyg419]

Forget both of them, buy a Longines! 🤫😜

[@smoko321]

I like both, but regarding Omega negatives, I prefer closed casebacks and some of their designs look a little cartoonish to me (some of the beefed up super cases from Rolex do, too). For Rolex, they are so controlling and have awful buying experience and so much baggage... Also, have you seen how Rolex puts ugly notches in the watch case now? They do not want you using any other strap on YOUR watch, so controlling. I won't even go into the latest Daytona design...

[@hunterwolfe6295]

So tell me how the datejust is better quality then the aqua

[@GraphicDesignerStephen]

There’s no way to convince me that a given Rolex model is worth twice (or more) a comparable Omega.

[@Mega-zi7ys]

They're not always twice as expensive. That's a misnomer. Many omega and rolex prices overlap. Just look at the 321, ck2998 etc

[@5amarillo5]

The market dictates the price

[@GraphicDesignerStephen]

@@5amarillo5 that doesn’t mean it’s worth the price…

[@Mega-zi7ys]

@@5amarillo5 there are real market forces and there are manipulated prices.

[@5amarillo5]

Shame on Omega then for not been able to crack the code. They fell to third place on sales in 2021 after Cartier and could not take second place back in 2022. And for 2023 there are no new releases. The gap between Rolex and Omega gets larger by the day.

[@efenli]

👍👍👍 Nice Comparison 👍👍👍

[@herbmerced7780]

Agree!

[@PapriceP]

Rolex movement specs are tighter than Omega. No one else does +-2 seconds.

[@orbitalgolem91]

Chris - looking forward to Part II where you explain why Grand Seiko is better than both of them. Spring Drive FTW. Flame suit on - lol...

[@smoko321]

Closed casebacks for me, it's

[@craiglinke8206]

I love Omega and I thought you were doing a serious video until you got to the 10th category. What James Bond wears does not warrant a seperate category. Fictional movie characters come under watch marketing and Rolex trump Omega in that one. Being honest I think too much is made of a Omega having the moon watch. Rolex’s have been taken to the moon and it’s known that the Pepsi was a popular private watch with NASA astronauts. Almost any watch can be used in space. The mantle Omega achieved was that NASA chose the Speedmaster for its offical watch over the Rolex, after extensive testing.

[@swissmade1497]

I think Rolex build a better watch however, Rolex does not exist to purchase nullifying the brand, it doesn’t matter if you can’t get one

[@AcmeRocket]

I am sure no one will have an opinion on this topic.

[@WatchChris]

Lol

[@watchdogpodcast239]

I'm not necessarily a fanboy of either brand, but I have owned a few of each. Just based on the watches alone, I prefer Rolex. I think they make a more refined watch. There's just not a whole lot that Omega does that excites me. They certainly have a lot going for them as you mentioned.

[@AS-po9pm]

You can actually buy Omega

[@lukewalker1051]

If you open up the comments, people are free to voice their opinion. To me, the getting mugged disparity between Rolex and Omega is laughable. A criminal won't discriminate. All Omegas have cache and are desirable. So, if in the wrong place and you are wearing an Omega or a Rolex, you are going to get mugged. Some people carry deterrents and know how to fight but that is another OT discussion to dissuade muggers from stealing our stuff. Btw, that applies to all nice watches of several brands. Like many, truthfully, I stay away from Rolex largely because of the stereotype. Btw, I don't begrudge anybody owning one, always been a fan of the Submariner, and if driving a Lambo with gold chains...Its all good. Omegas are nice but the watch industry is very crowded and some good competition from many brands. The recently released '57 Omega Chrono is a compelling watch but one must ask is it is $9K compelling. Btw, if you want to open up the discussion a bit more, Tudor has come to the fore as a worthy competitor to Omega at its price point. Tudor versus Omega IMHO is a worthy conversation. Of course, many will have their preference or bias because high end watches are effectvely art with many ingredients and people have different wrist sizes and aesthetic preferences. For example what Omega watch has been as desirable to collectors as the BB58 at its price point.

[@younusimam-thesalamproject6340]

Rolex is all about showing off to others. Its always more about a status symbol than getting a cool watch. The word "Rolex" is the most important feature of the watch. People arent as interested with any other name.

[@JackoWillMakeLives-loveu]

I sold my Rolex to get a new Zenith Chrono Sport. I’ve handled tons of Omega and Rolex models and Zenith easily hangs with them both on a quality/finishing level.

[@metro2171]

If omega is better than Rolex why is their market share so small in comparison to Rolex. Rolex was never a brand that manufacture high horology watches . Their watches are functional, robust practical and reliable nothing superficial. They make watches that consumer have high usage for hence the reason most people want a Rolex . For years people have been crusading to make omega the king but fail miserably

[@ALL-il1sw]

Market share does not equal quality, it just reflects marketing

[@goldencalf5144]

Yeah, the Omega marketing reeks of desperation.

[@jimsteinway695]

Making the most watches says nothing about quality. Patek a lange &Shone and vacheron don’t make the most watches and nobody says Rolex it better than those 3 makers Ask NASA who makes the better watch . I own both including a Daytona ghost

[@miabeatz80]

​@@jimsteinway695 Agreed! Also if you look at Patek and AP they don't use carryover cases and movements across their lineup like Rolex. They focus on high horology not simply precious metals and trendy colors. Imo buy what you want but also be well versed in all watch brands. By the way Daytona's used to be sold at a discount. There was a time they weren't the fan favorite....I guess the movement mysteriously got better or maybe they just sold the hype of Paul Newman to get buyers. Lol

[@goldencalf5144]

@@jimsteinway695 I asked NASA. They reckon Bulova makes the better watch ;)

[@michaelschweitzer7267]

I don’t think Omega is in the same class as Rolex. Omega is a quality mid tier product. Rolex makes its own movements and even makes its own steel. The finish and build quality is higher with Rolex. I love Omega and own two, but they are a step or two down from Rolex. I put Omega in the same class as Brietling.

[@simonwright6882]

I would have rolex in my collection if i could buy at retail. They are losing customers due to the false availability. This is great news for omega and Grand seiko.

[@watchdogpodcast239]

They have 30% of the Swiss Watch market share. Essentially one out of every four Swiss watches sold is a Rolex. Pretty remarkable. As annoying as their tactics might be they certainly work

[@davidr2802]

@@watchdogpodcast239 Agreed. The question is what is the long term effect and as well as how other brands should be planning out years ahead to increase their market share.

[@watchdogpodcast239]

The gap is so wide right now it will take a long time for it to shift. Rolex and Tudor outsell all 17 Swatch Group brands combined. It's crazy

[@mattys1467]

100%

[@marcuslieberman3577]

Great video Chris. I agree with you. Always a subject that needs to be discussed. I am not a Rolex fanboy but as a collector, I would like one. I will not pay a premium for it. I have the 2222.80 I will not trade it for all the money in the world(almost).

[@garyboyle695]

Rolex started out as marketing company that sold watches. Omega was first and foremost a watch company.

[@jimsteinway695]

Rolex has developed their marketing strategy more than any other company. That’s the only difference. Omega is a great watch

[@thegraciefighter102]

Omega has now become a marketing company first and foremost - how ironic

[@garyboyle695]

@@thegraciefighter102 Really, so they don't make any of their watches? Strange comment.

[@thegraciefighter102]

@@garyboyle695 they’re more a marketing company now selling plastic moon watches and bond memorabilia

[@clifforddriver9434]

When Rolex sets the price on there watches they factor in the the fraud factor that has there watches overpriced coming out of the gate.

[@PapriceP]

Omega is heavily discounted. Rolex isn't available. Omega make way too many limited editions.

[@nearly-blindbrian8372]

and you can actually buy an Omega

[@meijiturtle3814]

If I had the money I'd go for Omega. No question.

[@mrbud8524]

Great video! I own 3 Rolex sports models and l own 1 Omega it keeps better time keeping than my Rolex watches am definitely adding another Omega to my watch collection

[@kaiwilliams141]

#11 you can actually buy a new Omega

[@michaelkaasbundgaard7798]

You are right ❤ !!!

[@VandanaKashyap-mf5ze]

K

[@ahha6304]

as I commented once on Gringa's channel : "If I have enough money to buy a Submariner, I would by a Seamaster Professional and an Aqua Terra" because I can buy same quality as Rolex but with 2 Omegas at the same price

[@5amarillo5]

However... she owns a Submariner and no AT or SMP

[@ahha6304]

@@5amarillo5 yah, that too, but at least I made her spit some water with that line haha

[@stanislas4990]

Interesting comparison between Rolex and Omega. Both brands are great. May be Rolex is a more luxurious brand, but it's just my personal opinion. May be Rolex are more desirable because some models are not available, or with a long delay. Omega are less flashy than Rolex, for sure. Rolex are much more an investment than Omega, because their aftermarket price increase.

[@larrylacostjr.2075]

And Omega is in inventory. Like yourself, I own an Omega Seamaster. Yes, I bought it for James Bond, but now that I’ve owned it for several years, I can’t see myself going backwards to Sean Connery‘s submariner. I’m in sales and I never wear the watch while working, but my sales person mind just drives me crazy, knowing that there’s a Rolex sales person that can’t sell their complete product line of watches. And, the consumer loses as well. Knowing that I can’t get a Rolex on any given day, just absolutely turns me off and makes me want to never buy a Rolex. If I can’t access the product, how in the world can I depend on the company being there for me when my watch needs service? Sound ridiculous? That’s what we said with Mitsubishi and Saturn cars, for example. Think of all the brands that have ever failed and have gone out of business in life and you’re stuck with the product. Bottom line for both watch companies regarding consumers… treat your prospects like customers, and treat your customers like prospects. If these were the only two watch companies on the planet, support, inventory and choice for Omega’s watches will always beat out the little edge that Rolex may have with quality.

[@goldencalf5144]

Rolex is in no danger of going out of business. Omega is in inventory because they are not as heavily in demand as Rolex pieces.

[@5amarillo5]

If a brand is going down these days out of those two is Omega, they were outsold by Cartier for second year in a row and currently failing to present any new models for 2023. They already lost 5 months of the year on sales surge from releases. They are set to maintain their third place in sales or may keep going down. They are the Saturn cars.

[@terrysky83]

Rolex makes good watches but is brilliant at marketing; the worst thing about Rolex is the stuck-up lunatic fans who think anyone not wearing a Rolex is sub-par. It really alienates anyone who likes watches

[@goldencalf5144]

This is all in your head as an Omega fan. It's Omega fans who spend all of their time trying to convince everybody else that Omega is better than Rolex. The Rolex owner doesn't really care that much about what Omega does.

[@terrysky83]

@@goldencalf5144 😂 doesn't really care enough to leave another rubbish comment such as this?

[@goldencalf5144]

@@terrysky83 Well I'm not a Rolex owner. I just find Omega marketing and their overzealous fanboys a little cringey with their overcompensation.

[@lost5587]

​@@goldencalf5144 Rolex owners are some of the most self conscious, egotistic cucks I've ever met or seen

[@terrysky83]

@@goldencalf5144 simply because you haven't seen your Rolex fanboys' behaviours doesn't mean they aren't every bit as cringey as the Omega fanboys Ignorance isn't to be celebrated. You might do well to remember that

[@metro2171]

Why is the better Omega copying Rolex ???

[@ALL-il1sw]

I know right Rolex came out with the display case back, and BOOM just like that Omega copies and has display case backs on lots of models

[@miabeatz80]

​@@ALL-il1sw 😂 yeah and when Rolex was the first company to move the tachometer bezel to the outside of the case there was Omega again ready to steal yet again 😑🤣

[@frankv7068]

Rolex is a better brand all around, but I own and love both. Only Omegas I like and own are the Speedy, Seamaster GMT600 and the Deville. Only Rolex I like and own are the SD43mm both SS and TT, Skydweller and YM2. Omega is 2nd Rolex will always be 1st 🥇

[@z06cowboy72]

Typical Omega fanboy BS. Yours is better than mine...Who cares. Buy what you like and move on.

[@AcmeRocket]

Yes becuase Rolex fans never do that. 😂

[@miabeatz80]

You don't care but comment? 😅

[@z06cowboy72]

I don't care in the least, but am no fan of grown men acting like children. But you do you and be happy.

[@AcmeRocket]

@@z06cowboy72 respectfully, you visited a KZbinrs video channel with a very clear title to call him a fanboy. And others are behaving like children in your eyes? Respectfully?

[@sailgears]

variety & price makes a winner - Omega!

[@seanelstob5922]

6m23s. That strap. Yuck.

[@PapriceP]

Have you tried a Rolex Submariner glidelock bracelet? It blows anything by Omega out of the water.

[@bigj324]

This video is full of biased opinions. Everything you said was not fairly accurate. It seems you actually hate Rolex. You might as well make ranting video why you hate Rolex.

[@Vox-Populi]

Omega is like Cadillac, classy, and luxurious. Rolex is like Porsche, expensive and more exclusive. Super nice, but not a common man option.

[@hugohernandez3651]

Omega is my favorite brand. However, my favorite watches in my collection are Rolex. Love and own both brands. Omega should fire the whole marketing and sales división. They also spend millions in marketing and their market share is ridiculous compared to the guys with the crown.

[@goldencalf5144]

Agreed. The Omega marketing is so cringe, especially that hokey 007 schtick. Gives the brand less prestige.

[@miabeatz80]

​@@goldencalf5144 007 embodies class so why would it bring down the value. Let's not forget the first bond wore a Rolex so??? Btw "Paul Newman" "John Mayer" Daytona's are a shtick as well. What great feats have they accomplished in horology? They are simply marketing tools. No shame.

[@ALL-il1sw]

Agreed Omega marketing is terrible and they should fire them. Rolex engineers and development team creating the terrible 3200 problems should also be fired.

[@goldencalf5144]

@@miabeatz80 James Bond, if you've ever read the books, is pulp fiction. The association between Rolex and Bond happened organically as it was author Ian Fleming's favourite watch brand. And Sean Connery wore his personal Rolex when Dr No was filmed. Omega/Swatch group backed a trailer load full of money into the laps of the movie producers to become the exclusive Bond watch. Too bad they were 40 years too late to the party. But my main objection is the clumsy, tacky marketing that goes along with it. The 007 engravings on the case, the hologram James Bond, the shameless product placement in the films. It's the sort of thing that might impress a 12 year old, but it's no good for a luxury watch brand. Omega needs to relax and show a bit more restraint. You know, like Rolex.

[@hugohernandez3651]

@@goldencalf5144 Agree. I wouldn't buy a watch that says 007 on the case or the dial. It feels like buying a toy. Like those Rolex that say Domino's 😄. No thanks.

[@thegraciefighter102]

Better movements but worse brand. Omega has fallen off considerably in the last 4 years.

[@mell3109]

Technically Omega rocks but they don’t have the same amount of icon watches. Rolex has loads. P.s. I don’t own a Rolex

[@goldencalf5144]

Rolex has more iconic models. The Speedmaster is the one true titan of Omega's lineup. And the Daytona has come along and eaten its lunch. The Seamaster has always played second fiddle to the Sub. And of course, it loses points for the cringey James Bond marketing.

[@cecaju9516]

Bond wore a Rolex because Ian Fleming wore one. Bond wore an Omega because Omega paid the producers $3 million.

[@miabeatz80]

Bond actors wear Omega in their personal lives years after the movies. They aren't paid to do so. 😑

[@kentbristol948]

As I understand it, you can actually buy an Omega simply by walking in to an AD. No silly wait list nonsense.

[@goldencalf5144]

That's because it's less desirable than a Rolex.

[@davidr2802]

@@goldencalf5144 can't buy a 321 or a Snoopy

[@t4fast]

which of them will make ppl around you .. more excited ? that is the whole point of a luxury watch, to show off.

[@miabeatz80]

So why can't an Omega owner show off just as well. There are Omega watches that cost just as much as Rolex. Showing off shouldn't be the main reason you buy a luxury watch. If so you'll be the first one running to sell your Rolex the next time there's a price correction instead of just buying the design of watch you like. A wise man once said don't buy anything you can't buy five of and not be worried. Same goes for watches.

[@t4fast]

@@miabeatz80 Marketing plays a role.

[@miabeatz80]

@@t4fast yes marketing helps us decide which brands to buy. However marketing can't fake innovation or high horology, both factors that should also help you decide. I really like Rolex designs but I'm also aware that they use cleaver marketing to embellish their products. Example 904L steal isn't ideal. I've never seen a Rolex used without scratches so in reality it isn't really more scratch resistant. Also it's a limiting material in that it isn't as easy to form complex shapes out of. That's why no other brands use it.

[@t4fast]

@@miabeatz80 i think you are missing the whole point. marketing is about faking. Treska brand give you better scratch resistance material than both rolex and omega ; for a fraction of price. A female will give you more attention if you have rolex than Omega; just because Marketing has done its job.