Omega Seamaster 300M Old vs New Across 3 Generations - Perth WAtch

[@AlfredoRGuillen]

The first James Bond Omega Seamaster has the quartz caliber and the aluminum bezel. It is exactly the one you bring us today in this video. I think it is the most beautiful of all three.

[@PerthWAtch]

Yep that’s the one 👍

[@emhezmfe]

Love it, but no quartz for me-- gotta be the automatic version for me.

[@davidroscoe3815]

@@emhezmfe Got the mechanical/automatic version as my "wedding ring" from a wonderful woman in 2001 still wear it every day and always looks great.

[@totalynotfunnyguy6581]

First generation wins in terms of being the most classic, the second one wins in terms of beauty and design (in my opinion) and the third generation wins in terms of quality and manufacturing

[@PerthWAtch]

Nice summarized!

[@jarrodlee1506]

First gen transitional hands down.more character and isn't on wcery second persons wrist.ceramic sub suffers the go to for everyone problem.as well.just too common no originality in selection

[@jarrodlee1506]

Pulled the trigger on the 2006 to 2012 model today.great watch

[@explorerjlc1743]

your comment disappeared...

[@bryanryan4504]

Latest always worst quality and cutting corners.

[@wuyeah1980]

Seeing them together my personal favorite is actually the 90s.

[@PerthWAtch]

I'm sure you're not alone there William! :)

[@paulyoung4392]

I have the 1998 version. What a great watch! I would love one of the others. I'm not sure which one though .

[@lamnam5834]

I have one from 1992. Dad bought it not knowing a thing about it. He greatly prefers it over his submariner

[@mikeysrants4527]

I’ve got a 2003 and the only upgrade I’d want is the auto version. The new one with silver and blue looks good though

[@wuyeah1980]

A bit of update. You guys are welcome to check out my Instagram wuyeah1980, this video got me hooked. I got myself the 1st Gen SMP300 in midsize.

[@tjwon2005]

I pick 2012 model. It looks more classic to me - simple and clean. Size is perfect, too.

[@PerthWAtch]

Thanks - I do like that model also :)

[@jean4j_]

@@PerthWAtch aren't the number not that visible compared to the 1st and 3rd one?

[@Desh727]

I went in to buy the 2018 model, and left with the 2012 in black. I couldnt help it. The thing just looked so beautiful, I couldn't help it. I've had it on my wrist every day for over a year now, and I still admire it. No joke.

[@PerthWAtch]

Nice... did the price difference help the decision? They were clearing them last year, sometimes for over 25% off

[@Desh727]

@@PerthWAtch uh, kind of, but I was willing to spend more for the 2018 model. It was a bonus that it was cheaper but either way. The lacquer dial just looks insanely good.

[@a0r0a7]

I love all of them. My favourite is the 2012. The dial and hands just pop👍

[@PerthWAtch]

Thanks for those thoughts - the 2012 remains one of my favorite watches to be sure! :)

[@doffy9524]

Purchased the middle one after this same debate and boy do I feel like I made the right choice each time I look at it.

[@PerthWAtch]

Cool, when did you pick it up? I think it’s getting harder to source it now as it’s being phased out. Cheers! :)

[@doffy9524]

I purchased mine as the new model came out for a steal. Since then it's appreciated which I think comes from the versatility of the watch as youve said.

[@kennychung7771]

I’ve visited the 5th Ave Omega boutique and have to admit, the newer model, especially the movement and laser etched dial, is absolutely brilliant

[@PerthWAtch]

I think so too :)

[@tricky92x]

Lug to Lug is way too long, though. Looks amazing, wears terrible on a medium sized wrist.

[@Zeratsu]

@@tricky92x and the older models has a slimmer lug to lug? Do you know the dimensions?

[@tricky92x]

@@Zeratsu The 2531.80 has a 47mm lug to lug length, while the newest SMP has a 50mm lug to lug length.

[@Zeratsu]

@@tricky92x jeez 50 lug to lug is unwearable on my wrist. Thanks!

[@EazySDJ]

I have the 2012 in blue and its by far my favorite watch, it really is a timeless design. Understated, sleek and classy.🥰

[@PerthWAtch]

Thanks for the comment!

[@Ari_G73]

I agree. I just bought this myself

[@errorlogging459]

The previous generation clean dial is a gorgeous watch... the lacquer dial is so attractive...

[@PerthWAtch]

Thanks - I think so too :)

[@jaysterling26]

The natural fade on the bezell- lovely bit of wabi-sabi.

[@the00files78]

Great video! I still prefer the middel one. After 6 years, still one of my go-to watches. -Tyler

[@PerthWAtch]

Thanks for that - the lacquer dial middle model also remains one of my favourite pieces :)

[@MaestroDeca]

I love your podcast, 00 files! Keep it up! Hoping The Spy Who Loved Me gets 10s all across the board!

[@PerthWAtch]

What podcast??

[@Andrew-J316]

The one I pick is the 2012 model. Thanks for video!

[@PerthWAtch]

Thanks Andy, most welcome :)

[@FitOutPost]

Great episode for someone like me who doesn't know all the differences between those 3 generations. Very educational. I enjoyed it. Thank you for creating and sharing it.

[@PerthWAtch]

Most welcome man, glad you found it helpful! :)

[@BuzzOff.]

The 1993 model is the best. I have the automatic variant but will also be purchasing the 2018 model.

[@PerthWAtch]

Thanks for sharing that - all the best with getting the new model! :)

[@stevendudley9806]

The 1993 model is the best. I have the automatic variant but will also be purchasing the 2018 model.

[@jal2550]

Unreal how the 2018 model just took Omega to another stratosphere in quality. Not in a million years did I think I would ever pay 5k for a watch, Much less anything non Rolex. I've been a proud owner of exactly that model and color Diver 300 for over a year and LOVE my watch.

[@PerthWAtch]

Thanks for that - I think they’ve achieved something quite special with this model and when we look back it will likely be viewed as a major step for Omega :)

[@Jabber-ig3iw]

JAL I’d have this over any Rolex. If I was spending Rolex money I wouldn’t be buying a Rolex, much nicer and better quality brands out there.

[@carsonnguyen4423]

The original one and the newest one are absolutely gorgeous. The contrast on those models are perfect and timeless! The only gripe on the new one for me is the date location - I wish they would have left it at the 3 o clock position.

[@PerthWAtch]

Thanks for comment - actually I quite like 6 o’clock dates... it preserves the symmetry of the dial.

[@garywilliams589]

I had the choice between the 2012 and the 2018, I chose the 2012 as it is so versatile ,. You can go diving or you can were it to a wedding. Great break down of the 3 models. Keep the videos coming.

[@PerthWAtch]

Thanks mate :)

[@martinfrederiksen5630]

You Can easily wear the 2018 to a wedding.

[@jean4j_]

@@martinfrederiksen5630 I guess depending on your wrist it can appear a bit bulky which isn't typically a suit look. But depends on each person

[@randomnameindeed]

The second generation (the one in the middle) is by far the prettiest of the three.

[@PerthWAtch]

It’s a beaut for sure :)

[@yourbestfriend194]

The older one is just amazing!

[@PerthWAtch]

Yes it is :)

[@williamrizzo1285]

In my opinion Omega has really outdone themselves with the new 2018 upgrades. I love the 42 mm case size and the wave design on the dial as well as the color matching date window at the 6:00. The movement is brilliant as well. This watch is actually worth every dollar of the listed price! Thank you for another great review.

[@PerthWAtch]

Thanks for man, I’m glad you enjoyed the comparison. IMO the movement is perhaps the most important and impressive upgrade of all :)

[@nero8484]

The middle one...still classic with great proportions and the best wearing comfort!

[@PerthWAtch]

Thanks for the thoughts - I never thought about wearing comfort but I think you’re right!

[@imranbecks]

You are missing the 2220.80 SMP in there. Its a nice mix of both modern and old with the 2500 Co-Axial caliber but on the classic aluminium bezel and waves dial.... That's the one i have.

[@PerthWAtch]

Yep, that's right, although to be fair I actually did mention it. If I find one somewhere in the house I will be sure to update this video! ;)

[@Longshore79]

The 2012-2017 version in the middle. Absolutely stunning piece which can be worn with anything , even a suit! The new one is really nice too but the helium escape valve is too big .

[@PerthWAtch]

Yes I totally get what you mean! I really wish they had restrained themselves and kept it at 41mm!

[@kylelundy7870]

I agree about the escape valve, but the other improvements pulled me to choose the 2018 model.

[@Dan-56]

I have a black 300M that falls somewhere between your first and second models. 2008 if my memory is correct, it has the aluminum bezel and push pin bracelet but the wave dial with applied indices and the longer hands. I’m sure Omega made small changes through the years 😉.

[@PerthWAtch]

Ah probably the first co-axial model then? They ran for a brief period from the late 2000's - Craig wore a blue one in Casino Royale.

[@Dan-56]

Perth WAtch: Yes, it is a Co-Axial, so it has its feet in two generations of 300M 😃👍.

[@horologyproject]

Great video. I love each iteration. It kills me that the newest version is even larger. It pushes it over the edge for my wrist, unfortunately. I think they should relaunch the midsize, but this time at 38/39 vs the 36mm from the past.

[@gp2712]

Horology Project beef up your arms eat some beef jerky

[@PerthWAtch]

Personally I would've loved it if they kept it at 41mm.

[@horologyproject]

@@PerthWAtch I too would have preferred that. But a part of me hopes that the larger size will make way for a 39mm, but I think it may be wishful thinking on my part.

[@E2EK131MM]

‘Old faithful’ is still hands down my favourite. Looks absolutely stunning on the new Omega Steel Mesh bracelet. Picked one up several weeks ago.

[@PerthWAtch]

Steel mesh? Interesting…

[@tomscott4438]

I just picked up a 2017 version (last year) of the middle one. My local AD made me an offer (10% off) I could not refuse. The newer 42mm model was impressive, but I kept going back to the 41. Sat a bit better on my wrist and I preferred the more understated dial. I have three other watches (two DeVille's and a Grand Seiko) but this one is my everyday wearer. BTW, Omega really stands behind their product. Took mine in because the power reserve was falling a bit short. They performed a complete overhaul including new hands, seals, revised chronometer measurements (+2.5 spd) and returned it Fed Ex priority overnight and all under warranty so free of charge. You get what you pay for.

[@PerthWAtch]

Thanks for sharing that Tom - yeah if I had to be honest the 41mm sits better on my wrist as well, although I do like sporting the large 42mm also. It is good to know that you got such good service from Omega, I wasn't aware they would go to those lengths! :)

[@ivankerr3570]

Tom Scott good choice however you can get 20 - 25% off at any AD without trying

[@tomscott4438]

@@ivankerr3570 Where are you shopping? I visited all three AD's in my area (San Francisco Bay Area) and only one offered me a discount. Everyone else was selling at full retail... and I DID try.

[@whereRbearsTeeth]

Tom Scott, I negotiated 40% off of mine...paid $2640

[@PubliusMx]

@@whereRbearsTeeth where did you got that deal?

[@George-zt5ll]

I have the black non-wave ceramic. Bought it for me 30 years celebration in October. Love the simple, clean dial esthetic. It truly is an all around watch. My next one at 35 if everything goes well would be either a Rolex Explorer Mk1 or an Omega MOTFM.

[@PerthWAtch]

Well what can I say - you have good taste :) All the best for the next 5 years! :)

[@eddiestevens3220]

Moonwatch has to be

[@michaelchen6191]

Great comparison. Thanks . Makes me appreciate my 90's Brosnan more. One feature I noticed is the new ones look like they have a clear back to see the mechanics. Mine is an automatic with a hard steel back.

[@PerthWAtch]

Thanks - yeah that's right, only the newest model has the display back. Cheers!

[@hipphipphurra77]

Top review! On more note on the 2500 movement. The 2500 A/B/C are said to be little troublemakers, not so the 2500 D.

[@PerthWAtch]

Thanks for that. Yes I believe you’re right about that!

[@ronniep9272]

I have the 2012 version and love it, it will age the best out of the three in my opinion. The waves on the latest version are nice and the bracelet looks better but I don't like how they got rid of the applied logo on the dial and the font on the bezel, not to mention that oversized helium esxape valve.

[@PerthWAtch]

Yeah fair points - after a couple of years of ownership, my biggest gripe about the latest version is its size. Too big and chunky!

[@walz46379]

just got my 253180 (2001) a few days ago, LOVE it! liked the blue in the bezal and dail better in this version and a bit slimmer, just a treat on the wrist

[@PerthWAtch]

Very nice! Enjoy!

[@OmerBonfil]

Great review of the generations. I own the Seamaster Professional 225450 which is with the Speedmaster bracelet. It was the first watch I bought, and I saved for 7 years to get it. Since I saw it in the AD window in 2000, till I bought it in December 2007, I knew this is the one I want and no other. I have tried on the newest model, but I think mine is just perfect for me.

[@PerthWAtch]

Thanks for sharing that - wow 7 years, now that’s persistent! I’m glad the model wasn’t phased out in the time it took you to save up! :)

[@OmerBonfil]

@@PerthWAtch my watch collecting journey would have looked a whole lot different if that happened. I thought of several watches costing lot less during that time, but I knew I will never be satisfied without this one, so it had to be the first.

[@TruckeeDoggo]

The 2254.50 is widely considered one if the best Seamaster models ever

[@davelaughey431]

It's the most military spec and would undoubtedly have been a real James Bond pick. IMHO!!!

[@nicholasdibari]

Great video, I’ve got one similar to the 2541.80 but it’s the 2221.80. Longer hands and has “Seamaster” in red. Love the watch and I actually don’t mind that it’s a quartz. Planning to get the 2018 at some point.

[@PerthWAtch]

Nice one! Thanks for sharing - all the best with your next purchase!

[@pablorages1241]

Always liked the seamaster. The newest one for me ... I think Omegas are a better watch than many of the brands that get more exposure and charge more

[@PerthWAtch]

Thanks for that - oh yeah they are wicked good. In terms of sheer brand penetration, I reckon Omega is top 5 in most minds, if not top 3 :)

[@hipphipphurra77]

"Omegas are a better watch than many of the brands" true, but talking about luxury watches you don't by the watch, you buy the brand.

[@pablorages1241]

@@hipphipphurra77 that's the problem

[@jarrodlee1506]

Your buying marketing perception.omega is the best value wise with a better movement than rolex period.imo

[@pablorages1241]

@@jarrodlee1506 ... that's sort of what I said

[@JJ_Forza]

I think the newest model is absolute perfection. Kudos to Omega for improving on an already timeless design, there’s nothing I’d change about the new model and I’m going to be picking one up in black soon

[@PerthWAtch]

I think there is definitely a lot to like about it, with improvements in almost every facet. However I do really wish they kept it at 41mm, that would make it essentially perfect for me.

[@JJ_Forza]

Perth WAtch I’ve seen one in person and it wears much better than I thought it would when I first saw it was 42mm, if I had any criticism at all it would probably be the size of the Helium escape valve, I do like it being there as it gives it the distinction of a seamaster, however it’s a bit too prominent on the newer model

[@shifty6915]

Really nice review of all three generations. Informative, well thought out, and concise. I inherited the 90's gen from a great family friend. It is an absolute treasure. The hand length was not a huge bother.... until you see it next to the next generation. Still a lovely piece. The later generations are better in terms of features, however I happen to like the date appearance and the bezel of the 90's. Its the 90's for me lads. (could have the updated bracelet?)

[@PerthWAtch]

Thank you for that feedback - I am glad enjoyed this video and found it informative. The 90's SMP certainly has it's strengths and charms, which I think is part of the reason why it had such a long run and at times was Omega's best seller. Cheers!

[@MLeung-vl7we]

I happen to be wearing the original one 2531.80. $1,200 for an Omega thats just as tough as a Sub. Huge dial for its time but sites so flat and comfortable. Except for the co-axial movement on later models, any other upgrade is just a way to mark-up the price. Yeah, the bracelet screams 90's and a bit too busy, but it is super comfortable. Had it since 2006. Perfect all-around watch and value. How did the Seamaster go from $1,200 to over $4,000. Only complaint I have it the bezel shape. Very hard to turn if you have wet hands or gloves on.

[@PerthWAtch]

Thanks for sharing that, the original was indeed a bargain when we look back at it. A lot of the markup is thanks to branding and marketing, but there’s some real and tangible improvements also - I don’t think you can claim that ceramic bezel with enamel markings is not worth additional value. Not to mention also of course the new manufacture movement with additional stringent test standards and supreme anti-magnetic properties.

[@superduckcanfly]

Great video - a very clear and comprehensive comparison. Thanks for this! I like them all, and would be completely sold on the 2012 model if it had an exhibition case back, otherwise I'm leaning toward the 2018 edition.

[@PerthWAtch]

Thanks for that - glad you enjoyed the video :)

[@navegandolejanooriente6268]

Original Bond 1993, Upgrade 2006, Ceramic 2012 and a complete overhaul of the case and movement 2018. I really excited so see what Omega comes up for for the Bond Seamaster G5. Hopefully it will be slightly slimmer and less heavy case that the current model.

[@PerthWAtch]

Yes agreed, hopefully slimmer and back to 41mm for me! But next one might be another tweak rather than a whole new watch.

[@Pavlis83]

Couldn’t ask for a better comparison. Thank you so much

[@PerthWAtch]

Most welcome man - glad you enjoyed it :)

[@razerniick]

Am considering between the 2012 and 2018 version of SMP and found this. Thanks for sharing the differences between them, very educational. It helps alot! I’m leaning towards the 2012 for versatility! 😊

[@PerthWAtch]

Most welcome - glad you found it helpful!

[@solidus1995]

I love the bezel and braclet on the vintage.

[@PerthWAtch]

Me too :)

[@АндреасФернандес]

I have middle model, and very happy!

[@PerthWAtch]

I am very happy with that too! :)

[@michaelriera6277]

When I tried the non wave ceramic bezel SMP I simply felt it perfect. It was sporty yet elegant and it wore very comfortable on my thin 6.25 wrist. Then the latest version was announced and i decided to wait as this model came with a complete Coaxial architecture movement not a modified ETA and there were the waves I missed from the original. When I tried it on at the Omega Boutique in NYC I was a little disappointed. I left and returned back to the store, but the feeling remained. The SMP watch is gorgeous, feature rich, but felt clumsy and heavy on my wrist. My grail watch had lost its elegance, versatility, and superior comfort. Oddly I ended up buying a watch from a brand I always avoided for making watches that were too brash, too polished, too big. I purchased a Breathing Colt 41 with a beautiful blue dial (before the recent dial simplification) that is entirely brushed (no bling), with a bracelet that is the most comfortable I've ever worn. Not a fancy coaxial like the Omega, but a chronometer grade ETA that will be easily serviceable for years...and paid $1,975 only.

[@PerthWAtch]

Thanks for sharing that Michael... yes I am afraid that the newest model has caused significant disappointment with the increase in size. I still like it very much but oh how I wish they would have kept it at 41mm!! The odd conservative Colt from Breitling is a very good alternative choice I think... I reviewed a version of that earlier and even did a head-to-head against my lacquer dial SMP. So close is the choice here that I cannot remember which one won there! :)

[@Peter-tc3ep]

The Breitling colt 41 is a pretty watch always liked the chrono version with the circular pattern dial. Strange you found it smaller, the colt has longer lugs then the seamaster so they both are 50mm lug to lug. The colt is very slightly thinner by not having a crystal back and a more basic movement but very similar lug to lug. I think Breitling will make a come back soon, people have got to getting tired of Rolex.

[@michaelriera6277]

@@Peter-tc3epthe Breitling has a smaller diameter, thicker SS bezel with a smaller dial looks smaller, my non chrono sits flatter on the wrist, and the breitling bracelet is comparably better fitting than the Omega. The differences in dimensions are subtle, but when taken in totally offer a more comfortable wear. At least for me.

[@georges3061]

Excellent vid - congrats - I have the 2012 version. As you rightly noted, very classy. Also the watch pops in the light especially the framed date. But my issue with the watch was the bracelet - I found it too garish and it lacked a micro-adjustment , though I am told that Omega could replace it with the micro adjust clasp for a relatively cheap price. I opted to replace the bracelet with a Zealande blue rubber strap. It is nice and durable. I also had problems with the bezel as it is a bit difficult to grasp while turning. I was impressed by the GMT version and am looking now to find one on the pre-owned market.

[@PerthWAtch]

Thanks for sharing your experience! Personally I like the bracelet but yeah it doesn’t have micro adjust. An original Omega clasp with that feature is somewhere over $200 I believe.

[@leebarrett9581]

I’m fortunate enough to own the first one (auto) and I honestly think it is getting better with age, looks really cool but not flashy just like a classic car

[@PerthWAtch]

Lucky you... it’s a classic for sure!

[@herts9999]

And getting harder to find!

[@jamesrobert4106]

We have the first 2 Brosnan Bond films covered. 👌 I have the Goldeneye.

[@PerthWAtch]

Goldeneye had the quartz. The auto was in the next 3 Brosnan films. He did 4.

[@certainly2509]

I got a 1999 41 mm auto Seamaster. Definitely the most elegant and understated of the 3 generations, IMHO.

[@cgimovieman]

I’ve own and lovingly cared for the original, in automatic chronometer variant, since mid-2002. It was my first very nice watch, that I bought to commemorate the first year working my first professional job after college. Appropriately, the first place that I wore it very much was on a cruise with my family through the northeast of Canada and the U.S. I’ve had the watch professionally serviced by Omega just once in 2020, but it has been more of a special occasion watch for me that I’ve been extremely careful with and aware of when wearing it. So it has remained in flawless condition. I have to admit, I do really love the most current version maybe a little more though. It’s just so beautiful, has a more luxurious look, and the co-axial movement is just better. But I just can’t seem to part with my original. Mainly because I’ve had it for so long, and what it represents. I am pleased that it has held its value in the quality I’ve kept it, and even increased. I bought it new for $1,750 in 2002. Pristine versions like mine I’ve seen recently selling for $3,200 to $3,500. Pretty amazing. Love Omega though. Finally purchased a Speedmaster Moon Watch with sapphire face/back from the Omega boutique in Chicago just weeks ago. Even dressed up to do it. The staff was very professional, and even served us two glasses of Moët champagne while we spoke and went over the details. I’m not a millionaire, but it’s fun to have somewhat similar experiences on rare occasion.

[@bennidhem7530]

I follow you from France! I love the topics you cover and in addition I work my English I do not understand everything you speak really fast but I understand the essential. what is the best choice a speed master moonwatch or a sea master 300 (black dial rubber strap)?

[@PerthWAtch]

Thank you for that, glad you find the videos helpful! If you find I speak too fast, you could try slowing the play speed to 0.75 perhaps? KZbin has a handy feature to do that. As for what is the best choice, well there is no one right answer... those are two rather distinct watches so it really depends on what you’re looking for. Cheers!

[@erth2man]

Over the years I have collected and used a number of Seamaster and Aqua Terra Omega watches. In my opinion the 1120 movements have proven to be such a rock solid workhorse and any watchmaker can service these quite easily. The 2500 Co-Axial in all practical use didn't seem to be better in any way I could tell. I have yet to own/use the new in house movement however, perhaps some day.

[@PerthWAtch]

Thanks for sharing those insights. I think there is little doubt the 1120 was perfect good and had a good track record. The 2500D has also proven to be good now, and co-axial supposedly should give better positional rate results overall (but yeah, hard to notice for us).

[@jamessmith6402]

Nice comparison I still like the quartz version 😀 thanks Ivan

[@PerthWAtch]

Thanks James - yeah it’s just a bit annoying that the seconds hand on mine doesn’t hit the marks anymore... :(

[@mcstarling07]

@@PerthWAtch mine doesnt either anymore, Ivan. It's still a beautiful watch and I absolutely love it. I'm going to pick up a newer model for the collection though and I may even go black dial or that grey dial.

[@JohnJohnson-dv1ds]

I have an old Seamaster automatic just returned from service from the Swatch Group in Culver City in LA. It was a 1K service but worth every penny. Looks better than new if that’s possible. I have many watches worth more but this one touches my soul.

[@PerthWAtch]

Ooh nice one! For that much work I suppose the charge is justified!

[@Brian1f1]

Why was it 1k? I thought it was around $500?

[@watchyourstyle]

I own the middle and right one. While I like the newest one in terms of tech, it’s way too bulky and the bracelet isn’t comfortable at all. I much prefer the previous generation overall.

[@PerthWAtch]

Thanks for sharing your thoughts!

[@nm9137]

I have the 2012 model in black (albeit I purchased in 2017). Love the watch, perfect for my smaller wrist size. I have noticed that the bezel markers are quite bright. Must have been subtle changes from 2012 albeit the same model. I also like the original watch- as this is the one worn by JB, however I have seen models where the bezel starts to fade being non ceramic. The 2019 model is a beautiful watch but probably will sit a but too large for me. All 3 are amazing in their own way

[@PerthWAtch]

Thanks for sharing that - yeah you might be right in that they made improvements to the bezel contrast along the way. And yes, I do agree that all 3 have their own special strengths and attractions - all 3 are keepers for me :)

[@benlait3696]

Easily the 2018 model far superior movement and finishing, the wave dial has to be seen close up to appreciate how well it's done. The clasp is amazing and the date position is perfect.

[@PerthWAtch]

Thanks for sharing those thoughts!

[@pshhyeahh]

I have the model you mentioned was missing from the video in black. I also have the Electric Blue sword hand model with the Bond Bezel. I was going to sell the black coaxial for a Rolex Submariner, but the sub keeps increasing in price. I recently decided that I'll be keeping both Seamasters even if I do get a subby.

[@PerthWAtch]

Both great models I think - you’re a lucky man!!

[@bazs7669]

2012-2018 model is gorgeous! That deep lacquered black is mesmerising

[@PerthWAtch]

Yeah I tend to agree!

[@davinci745]

Love the Seamasters. I bought my first Seamaster in Quartz model when I was 18 from my summer job money. After that I´ve had two seamasters in automatic 1999 and 2002. The 2002 is in for complete service now and will also change second hand+bezel ring. Really looking forward to see it in its original glory (keeping the old parts of course.) I must say I really love the vintage printing on the early model and without the rings around the markers. In my opinion it gives some of the same feel that is appreciated in vitage rolexes like 5513 and 1680 (I´ve owned those two as well). I must say however I think Omega have done alot right with the newest one, That one and the ´no time to die´model is absolutely the most tempting new buys for me at the moment.

[@PerthWAtch]

Thanks for the sharing those interesting stories! I think the Omega Master chronometers are possibly the best 3 hand movements in the world at present. I do wish they kept the newer one at 41mm and made it thinner though.

[@koryreid7566]

Wonderful video! I own the 2012 model because I couldn’t stand the cartoonish bezel and wavy dial of the new generation.

[@PerthWAtch]

You bought that after checking out the current model?

[@realfire6883]

Just stumbled across this. Like always your videos are awesome. I still am in love with my 2007 2531.80, just actually got it back from Omega service and this watch is the one that still brings a smile to my face when I wear it. You can wear this watch with shorts and flip flops or a tuxedo, very versatile and one I'll never part with!

[@PerthWAtch]

Thanks for that - yeah luxury divers have made their way into more formal wardrobes, and this one works with nearly anything in that context. Strictly speaking however one should stick to a proper dress watch when going with a tux.

[@realfire6883]

@@PerthWAtch if james bond can wear with a tux, so can I lol

[@PerthWAtch]

Me too!

[@kaikaichen]

To me the ideal 300M would have the thinness and size of the 1993 model, the dial/face of the 2012 model, and the bezel of the 2018 model.

[@PerthWAtch]

Haha that would be a nice watch!

[@Zeriod101]

I own the the newer 2018 version. Originally had from new the ‘Goldeneye’ automatic version which I regret selling and hope to reintroduce back into my collection one day. My only gripe with the 2018 model is that the bracelet manufacturing has been outsourced to China. There’s been a number of spring clasps failing on the 2018 version according to many forum posts. Great review enjoyed watching it 👏

[@PerthWAtch]

Oh dear... which part of the clasp tends to fail? The push button spring? I’ll need to look more into this... I seem to recall that the bracelets have been manufactured in China for over a decade now...?

[@LuisFranciscoAguilar]

1st Ceramic Seamaster. Great size, and very good looking. The new one looks like toy, a bit gimmicky, looks like a fashion watch in general.

[@PerthWAtch]

Thank you for your comment - that's fair enough. Personally I find that I can enjoy all 3 versions here, for the strengths that each has :)

[@Jabber-ig3iw]

Producer A.K.A couldn’t disagree more, of those 2 I’d have the current model without the wavy dial. Much better looking watch. Of the 3 I think the 1st one is the best looking. Slimmer and better on the wrist. That said it’s all down to personally choice, but saying the current one is gimmicky is just plain wrong.

[@LuisFranciscoAguilar]

@@Jabber-ig3iw I had a SM300 2018 in black for 2 weeks. I tried, but couldn't stand it, sold it and of course, lost money on it. Poor Design in my opinion.

[@keithattwood59]

Bought mine in 2005. Love it and wear it every day

[@PerthWAtch]

Nice one :)

[@exvan3571]

Excellent work sir! This vid will remain relevant for years! Have the 2012 SMPc in black, it does everything well and I prefer it overall. You've convinced me to put the 2018 in blue on the list.,") Cheers!

[@PerthWAtch]

Thank you for that - glad that you appreciate the "evergreen" aspect of the video. At least until the next version comes out! :)

[@alwayspooh1588]

I own the early model, but I think the 2012 is the best of the three. Looking back, I wish I had got the automatic, but the quartz was the Bond model, and that skewed my view!

[@PerthWAtch]

Is the quartz really "the Bond model"? Granted it's the first one worn in Goldeneye, but Brosnan wore an automatic for the remainder 3 movies... arguably the automatic is the TRUE BOND MODEL ;)

[@star1child109]

I keep changing my mind, so I'll have to say that I like all three in their own unique way! (but like the price of the 90s one best)

[@PerthWAtch]

Haha I probably feel the same way! The 90’s one is classic, but to get your hands on a great condition specimen today would be quite expensive...

[@greenbow7888]

13:25 The SMP that you have there doesn't use Liquid Metal. LM is used on the Planet Ocean where metal is poured into the laser etched bezel. The SMP is enamel (as you said) poured in. Just saying. Have watched this vid plenty of times for some reason. Probably because my gut feeling told me to get the first model ceramic in blue. (The middle one in your vid.) For some reason though the blue looked off in the shop lights, and nothing like it does in videos. I should have asked the store if they could bring it outside into daylight. The blue just looked off to me, However I definitely regret not buying it, as I know I would have loved it. (I was too quickly dismissive, but also I'd had a bad experience with an automatic.) I also had the original first generation in quartz too, in that royal/electric blue. Sadly I bought the 36mm whereas I should have bought the 41mm. Doesn't bother me so much as I don't still have it. I also owned the royal/electric blue one in automatic, and that was the bad experience. The slightest knock and the timekeeping went mad gaining 5 seconds a minute. Probably just a bad model that needed fixing, but I did not keep it.

[@PerthWAtch]

Yes that's correct, this model isn't liquid metal, as others have said. No need to keep feeling bad - you can get the older version in the after-market at discount!

[@surfitli]

Avery nice watches. I never had an Omega. If I had to chose I would probably pick the currant Version. The larger size is a plus for me as well as the ,movement, date location,clasp, and Bezel. Like the hands better on the middle Version. I would actually like the see the wave dial in Black to how it looks. I think for me personally, I would go for the Planet Ocean, I like its more tool watch aestic.

[@PerthWAtch]

Hi there, yep I agree, for a full blooded tool watch I would consider the Planet Ocean :)

[@jarrodlee1506]

I'd get the great white.more appealing and less common

[@thewattbomber]

2nd generation is a beauty and a half.

[@PerthWAtch]

Thanks :)

[@luisantoniosilva5559]

I got the 2561.80.00, similar to the first one. A beautiful watch.

[@PerthWAtch]

Nice one!!

[@gman9696]

2220.80 is my favourite (7:00). But from your collection I'd take the 2012 co-axial.

[@PerthWAtch]

Yeah I really would love to get my hands on the 2220.80 (first co-axial model with wave dial)!

[@craigwthomson]

I was fortunate enough to pick up a pre-owned co-axial wave dial (2220.80.00) earlier this year. It’s the perfect size and I prefer the classic bezel font to the modern ceramic version, which to me, appears slightly ‘cartoonish’, especially alongside the Rolex Submariner. It has the red ‘Seamaster’ script on the dial to match the red tip of the second hand. It also has other upgrades in the form of a longer minute hand and applied markers, whilst retaining the Omega hippocampus case back design featured by the earlier models. I tend to wear mine everyday for work, but it’s currently away for servicing and the case and bracelet are being refinished. Arguably the last recognisable Bond watch before product placement got out of hand and the Omega marketing department took over. As worn by Daniel Craig during the train scene in Casino Royale. VL: “Oh, you are? I like this poker thing. And that makes perfect sense! Since MI6 looks for maladjusted young men, who give little thought to sacrificing others in order to protect Queen and country. You know... former SAS types with easy smiles and expensive watches.” [Glances at his wrist] VL: “Rolex?” JB: “Omega” VL: “Beautiful” 😘

[@PerthWAtch]

Haha thanks for that - oh how I would have loved to get my hands on that model, I really like the muted blue and also the co-axial with wave dial. Craig wore Planet Ocean for the initial rough and tumbles of Casino Royale, and then he wore that SMP from the train scene onwards for the rest of the movie. It is recognisable and interestingly crosses over from the Brosnan era. As for the most recognisable recent Bond watch, I think without doubt it would the Seamaster 300 with Master chronometer from Skyfall... the only Craig watch that had specific screen time and also discussion about its added function (Q: “the alarm is rather loud, if you get my meaning”) :)

[@craigwthomson]

Perth WAtch Thanks for the opportunity to contribute to the channel and engage with other members of the watch community! Subscribed after watching this and the Oris Aquis video - two of my favourite diver’s. Look forward to seeing what more you have in store in 2020. Best wishes, Craig (Scotland)

[@sajithkodiyath9749]

I love all of them but 2012 is my personal favorite - always on my wrist!

[@PerthWAtch]

It’s a nice watch!

[@haybob2527]

I suppose everyone has to have an Omega in their collection ..I have a 1999 Seamaster Chronometer(Cal-1120) white dial, and only 36 mm case..Looks very small compared to your ones..)

[@PerthWAtch]

Wow 36mm, that’s cool! Would indeed look very small in comparison to these “monsters”. Thanks for sharing that :)

[@braziers]

Great comparison, but you mention the latest model have a liquid-metal bezel insert... that's incorrect. Liquid metal inserts are found on the Seamaster 300, and feature a ceramic bezel with metal pressed into it. The Seamaster 300M Diver simply has a ceramic bezel with enamel painted into the laser-cut grooves.

[@PerthWAtch]

Yeah you're right, I got that bit wrong - the SMP 300M has ceramic with enamel markings.

[@dustinr16]

Still prefer the outgoing ceramic model. Better size with a beautiful inky dial. Looks really classy and is much more versatile. Wish they just put the 8800 movement and the upgraded clasp on the older ceramic model. Not a fan of the display back on the new model either.

[@PerthWAtch]

Yeah I definitely would’ve loved it if they kept it at 41mm, and give us that awesome new clasp. I don’t mind the display back, I do enjoy looking at the movement - it’s not haute horology but I reckon it’s pretty nonetheless :)

[@dustinr16]

Perth WAtch I get the “value” of a luxury dive watch having a display back (8800 is a nice movement) but seems contradictory in a watch that has a helium escape vale trying to be a “tool watch”. I guess I miss the engraving of the hippocampus on the Seamaster caseback. Wish I picked up one of the older ones. The new one at 42mm and nearly 50mm lug to lug is way too big for my 6.5” wrist. Hope they do a smaller midsize (36-40mm) version one day.

[@PerthWAtch]

Yeah it is somewhat of a contradiction having a display back on a purportedly 300m diver, but what the hey, I love it :P Well they did put out a 36.5mm of the previous model I think so there's at least some likelihood of a smaller one coming out in future :)

[@SuperSnakePlissken]

One of my first jobs in college was working for a high-end jewelry store that sold omega watches and I purchased a 2003 Seamaster. I love that watch and had it until the 2018 update came out and I could not resist I had to buy a black-faced new omega Seamaster. I wear that watch every day it’s my absolute favorite.

[@PerthWAtch]

Nice one! What did you do with the old watch?

[@SuperSnakePlissken]

@@PerthWAtch I had it serviced and then gave it to my youngest brother. He wears it still and 20 years later still works great. I serviced it every 5-6 years and made sure it was always in tip top shape. I've got several Omega's now including a Speedmaster and Aqua Terra. Omega does something no other watch company does, and that's make beautiful modern looking watching with excellent movements at an unbeatable price.

[@PerthWAtch]

Omega is certainly close to my favourite company, if not actually my favourite… although style is subjective and some don’t like them. Their current Master Chronometer movements are the best 3-hander movements in the world, as far as I know, so yeah they are difficult to beat in terms of giving an excellent manufacture movement for the price. In terms of a company which makes beautiful watches with excellent movements and unbeatable price… well I’d say Seiko certainly fits the bill. Within Swatch group Longines catches my eye too, although mostly not manufacture movements.

[@TedCornish]

I'd love them all Ivan. They are one of the most stunning watches available

[@PerthWAtch]

A worthy addition to the wish-list for sure Ted! :)

[@TedCornish]

@@PerthWAtch my grail list as as long as a long thing but slightly longer

[@whereRbearsTeeth]

Cornish Watch Reviews, huh??

[@hugomota3696]

So good to see those second hands syncronized!

[@PerthWAtch]

Chalk it up to my OCD :)

[@loukrstevski6583]

The 2012 watch is the easiest to dress up or dress down due to its clean design.

[@PerthWAtch]

That's a fair point!

[@CaptainRambunctious]

My favourite is the one I own, the 2015 model but the date wheel isn’t colour coordinated, it is black which has always slightly annoyed me. I prefer the date at 6 o’clock on the newest version and it is now the dial colour too, but that case thickness puts me off the newest model. I always liked the slender case sides as it made the lugs look curvier... there is no doubt that the newest watch is a huge leap ahead due to its movement where its predessessor was essentially 20 years old just with a new escapement, but its just a little too fat for me now... thanks for the video, Tally Bally Ho!

[@PerthWAtch]

Thanks for sharing those thoughts - you’re definitely not alone in feeling that the newest model is rather slab sided in comparison with its predecessors... definitely one of the weaker points of the new design!

[@andrewwheeler8591]

My date wheels colour coordinated I have the SMPc black! 😁🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿

[@InChristJesus87]

The three are spectacular but the newest one imo is the one to get. I'm a little biased because I have the black one but if I were to choose only 1 out if my collection it would be that one.

[@PerthWAtch]

Thanks for that - I think objectively speaking the newest one is definitely superior in all measurable domains :)

[@timothyouellette2815]

Having owned the first generation & now recently acquiring the newest generation. I have to say the newest version & it’s amazing movement make it a clear winner. Plus, I rather like that the new one with the waves more pronounced. Note I purchased my 2000 for $2095 from Ben Bridge Jewlers. Just for a price comparison & note I found my latest version for $4495

[@PerthWAtch]

Thanks for sharing your experience - that’s a pretty good price for recent purchase of this I must say

[@Dave062YT]

20I2 is the clear winner ,wave dial on the new model is trying too hard and as you point out the hand set on the 90 s lets it down .The 20I2 just gets it all right and even the slightly faded looking bezel adds character and style .Not a fan of blue dial watches myself so the black dial still looks the best to me .

[@PerthWAtch]

Thanks for sharing those thoughts! I’m a sucker for blue watches and personally do enjoy all 3 generations here despite the minor weaknesses present in each one. Cheers!

[@sale83]

Love them all, but 2531.80 is the ultimate one for me. Fortunate to have one with still perfect bezel. Piece of art.

[@PerthWAtch]

Beautiful - I envy you :)

[@Eric-le8wu]

For me the new 2018 one is the one I like the most. The ceramic bezel and that stunning laser engraved dial does it for me.

[@PerthWAtch]

Yeah it certain is striking!

[@travisharrisphotography]

I have the first version (bought in 2010, it was my wedding gift. Its black with the automatic movement) Here we are 10 years later.. it still runs perfect (gains a little over a months time.. but thats normal). I have never had it "serviced", I probably should do that. I do love the new one too, the 2012 looks the most "bland" to me (subjective tho). The wave pattern on the older one.. is just so iconic.. its by far my fav. and I think as time moves on (pun intended) it will become more valuable. I am glad they stopped making it.. and its now hopefully going to go up in value one day.

[@PerthWAtch]

I love the first version in automatic - as the first Bond Omega (I am reluctant to count the quartz) it will always have a special place in history, and I am sure will continue to appreciate in value.

[@jamesrobert4106]

​​@@PerthWAtch The Quartz 2541.80 IS the first Bond Omega. You can't be reluctant about facts.

[@paulbelopolsky7460]

Nice review but I picked up a couple of mistakes. The date wheel on the 2012 version is black and not blue. The numbers on the bezel of the current version are not liquid metal. Liquid metal was used on the bezel of the Planet Ocean and the vintage inspired Seamaster 300.

[@PerthWAtch]

Right on both counts - well spotted!

[@Longshore79]

The middle one for me 2012-2017

[@PerthWAtch]

You have good taste ;)

[@JupiterTarts]

New wave dial one in a heartbeat. The most visually interesting of the trio IMO

[@PerthWAtch]

Fair enough, I get what you mean.

[@andrewbalahura1555]

Date must be on “3 “ position !! Love my black 2012 ✌🏻

[@PerthWAtch]

Why "must be"?

[@MrGuto]

Great comparison! The original 1993 model is my favorite! I have one of these.

[@PerthWAtch]

Interesting - would it still be your favourite if you only had the 2012 model?

[@MrGuto]

@@PerthWAtch based on your review, yes. I never handled on though. maybe I'd have another opinion if I did.

[@PerthWAtch]

Fair enough mate! 👍

[@stephendonnelly4524]

Plain , no wave face is by far a classier looking watch. Everyday, everywhere, every time, end of.

[@PerthWAtch]

Maybe. Old and new models also good.

[@Sena-co1ug]

Great video identifying subtle differences in cosmetic upgrades over the years. I handled and tried all of them but there is still a feel of originality in the 90s release, which I believe accounts for a richer soul in the timepiece. The dial pattern in the new one doesn’t seem as well detailed as it does in older versions. Sort of a crayon-like touch, compared to the finely detailed ones of old (vintage Movado comes to mind).

[@PerthWAtch]

Thanks for that - interesting thoughts about the wave dial details there. I think the newer one clearly isn’t as compact and is less dense, but I would say the precision and sharpness is greater. That perhaps gives it a more artificial or machine made feel...

[@Sena-co1ug]

Perth WAtch That’s true as well. I feel the farther back I explore I find a better balanced presentation in timepieces. For example, newer models from many makers tend to emphasize the watch face more than any other part of the instrument. Now I’m not generalizing, but I am inclined to believe that this played a big part in Breitling’s decrease in popularity over the years. A brand with quality on par with the best. Hopefully, in its quest to implement new designs, Omega doesn’t follow suit.

[@phmwu7368]

Omega's 1960s toolwatches have become " waved glitterballs " aimed at the Asian market... References sound like international telephone numbers LOL

[@PerthWAtch]

Not sure about the intention of aiming at the Asian market... regardless there appears to be massive interest among Caucasian Australians I know here. But I do agree the references do look like international phone numbers!

[@valjean3141]

I really like the look of these, and my next watch purchase will be an Omega. I’m torn between several possibilities, but currently leaning towards the new white dial SMP. It’s more on the toolish side, and invites comparison with the Sinn 104 or the polar Explorer 2 in terms of appearance. Pretty spiff!

[@PerthWAtch]

Thanks for that - yeah that new white dial brings a different look and feel to the range for sure! Seems to be popular and in demand... will be keen to see how it performs!

[@DarylChangs]

Perth WAtch I can’t seem to be able to decide between the blue, black and white dial.

[@PerthWAtch]

Haha I get what you mean! First world problems :)

[@trevbarlow9719]

I'll pick.... the 2254! Or the latest one, AKA The Sub Killer.

[@PerthWAtch]

Haha I wonder if that name is gonna catch on :)

[@LuisFranciscoAguilar]

Funny nickname. Sub it's simply on another realm.

[@trevbarlow9719]

@@LuisFranciscoAguilar yup, a less interesting realm.

[@LuisFranciscoAguilar]

​@@trevbarlow9719 It's ok to defend something you like, but one thing is something you like and the other is the reality. It's a fun and nice watch to have, but just that. Omega clearly forgot the 'Design goes with function' aspect of things.

[@trevbarlow9719]

@@LuisFranciscoAguilar go on, please tell me how Omega have forgotten that "form goes with function". You can start be first explaining what that means, as I suspect it's become an meaningless cliche when it comes to watches.

[@Blue_3rd]

I always wanted the 1993 model but automatic (2531.80). Nowadays I really like the 2012 waveless dial, I prefer less text and the dial has great depth.

[@PerthWAtch]

It’s a beauty I reckon - have you gotten one already?

[@Blue_3rd]

Perth WAtch I wish! One day though, one day 😃

[@TheJoaninhaMendes]

Call me a heretic, but i don't like the waves. So, the 2nd gen.

[@PerthWAtch]

What’s wrong with the waves?

[@pnwsportsman4036]

Amazing video. Thanks for comparing all 3. I just purchased the newest model in Blue. Love all 3!

[@PerthWAtch]

Awesome! Me too :)