Omega Seamaster Diver 300M Chronograph 210.30.44.51.03.001 Omega Watch Review

Contact [e-mail] for pricing and availability; Either I have it, or I can get it!
Shop all Omega watches: bit.ly/2v2XXR9
The Omega Seamaster Diver 300M Chronograph 210.30.44.51.03.001 is encased in 44mm of stainless steel surrounding a blue ceramic laser-engraved dial on a stainless steel bracelet. Features of this Omega Seamaster Diver 300M Chronograph include hours, minutes, small seconds, date and chronograph. This Omega watch also measures 17.5mm in thickness and 52.5mm from lug-to-lug.
For complete details, watch the full Omega Seamaster Diver 300M Chronograph review by Tim Mosso!
Please subscribe to our channel for the best luxury watch reviews on KZbin: www.youtube.co...
Visit our website at www.thewatchbox.com for the latest pre-owned luxury watch arrivals and industry-leading value in previously loved luxury timepieces.

[@flwolf2000]

Finally someone who knows all the details of what he's presenting. Great video!

[@W1NGZER0]

That blue looks amazing

[@ianarn]

I’m glad you made it clear that the escape valve is just for saturation divers! Not the average recreational reef diver.

[@eddy887]

I gonna get one. Black or blue. Which one is better? I tried the black one. Looking amazing. Not that big actually. Not sure the blue one.

[@ntartaris]

Black......all the way. Will never go outta style.

[@rickyoo5233]

I got the blue.You can''t go wrong either way, I was looking at the seamaster 300 but after I tried this watch... done deal. Bit heavy but jesus the compliments don't stop with this watch.

[@IUsedToBeAPygmy]

What amazes me most is your ability to keep explaining without interruptions. You could sell me a hotdog for $1500 just by showing it from different angles while describing the view. Please never stop.

[@vaughanatkinson8421]

A very underestimated piece, ideal for daily wear...and compare what you get for the price, puts some other manufacturers to shame!!

[@LuisFranciscoAguilar]

And some Cheeseburguers too!

[@vaughanatkinson8421]

@@LuisFranciscoAguilar i don't get your statement..elaborate please!

[@LuisFranciscoAguilar]

Vaughan Atkinson Hahaha sorry😅. Boy that watch is huge!

[@vaughanatkinson8421]

@@LuisFranciscoAguilar ah with you now, lol....yes it is, more of a quarter pounder...but it actually wears really comfortable!!

[@David-uz5zo]

so you can leave this running with no wear and tear to the unit.... so I could literally start this when I wake up stop and reset every day and that would be fine? So I can see the second hand move when I check the time

[@mrp9498]

Be cool if you review the two tone versions of this.

[@johnmcdonagh1607]

Tim, the helium escape valve is for use in a DECOMPRESSION CHAMBER, not whilst diving 🤔.

[@gmshadowtraders]

You can still try it out though right?! Lol

[@johnmcdonagh1607]

gmshadowtraders Aye, go ahead then ! Good luck when your watch probably floods ...😉😂

[@gpearce11]

I honestly don’t know why Tim keeps reiterating that detail, even though he has been corrected in the comments multiple times in several of his reviews of the current SM300M line. For anyone who doesn’t know, on older SM 300M if you left the Helium release valve open the watch was rendered completely vulnerable to water. This isn’t too much of an issue however, as they should only be opened while inside a decompression chamber, as John mentioned. With the release of the new SM300M line, however, if you accidentally leave the He value open the watch is still 50m WR; handy if you accidentally wash it under a tap or fall into a swimming pool with it open. Unfortunately, Tim keeps saying you can open it during a dive, which you absolutely SHOULD NOT DO, because 50m WR is most definitely not enough WR while diving underwater.

[@mr.chronograph9022]

Great looking watch

[@kovlabs]

you forgot to mention that the chrono pushers can be operated underwater (confirmed by Omega)

[@BlackHole-c3n]

Good point 👍🏼

[@jonathannguyen8546]

Tim! How much your wrist ? Please let me know. I want To buy seamaster 44, but I can’t compare. If your wist same my wrist I will buy smaller one. Thanks Tim

[@jonathannguyen8546]

Tim! Please let me know your wrist. I want to buy seamaster 44. But I don’t have any sample to compare. If your wrist small same my wrist, I will buy a small one. Tks Tim

[@chengkokkay2639]

I like this watch

[@henrywest7217]

Big statement!

[@AMogus-jr6qk]

No

[@Wildcatjames1]

It looks great! Such a shame the normal smp isn’t that shade of blue though. Or is it the light?

[@garytopley12]

The SMP is Royal blue and the Chrono is Navy I think.

[@uclapu]

Color is same. Have the blue sedna ss smp 300.

[@gpearce11]

Pretty sure it’s just the lighting. This is the second one of these he’s reviewed; the other was under the regular lighting (as it was a used watch, instead of a showcase video) and looked like the standard SM300M.

[@garytopley12]

@@gpearce11 you could be right there as the shade of blue changes in different lighting settings.

[@IHWKR]

One day the masses will wake up and realize Omega is just a better and more affordable company than the brand that shant be named.

[@LuisOrtizMBA]

How fast does the chronograph minutes hand move? Does it measure 60 or 30 minutes?

[@mhult33]

Luis, the chronograph minute hand is in the three o’clock sub dial, which is a 12 hour recorder. So the minute hand goes to 60.

[@ouesal]

this or the planet ocean 600m blue dial? I will buy next month but I'm confused between this two, the PO 600m doesn't have chronograph though! Please advise me :)

[@MaestroDeca]

I love the planet ocean chronograph, but this one has a lot more flair and style. The PO Is just plain beautiful .

[@MaestroDeca]

If that makes sense

[@rickyoo5233]

why get the planet ocean? just more for less.

[@BlackHole-c3n]

It’s amazing!!!!!!!

[@user-jd2zs8ql1v]

It’s huuuuuuuuuuuuuuuge

[@escanor9920]

No it’s not 😁 !!! You’re just tinyyyyyyyyyyy !

[@rickyoo5233]

its heavy too but you feel like a million bucks with the watch on.

[@ItsNeverTooHot4Leather]

This is the watch gives the Rolex Submariner AND Rolex Daytona PTSD.

[@AMogus-jr6qk]

Don't think it competes with either lmao

[@u.u.u9969]

Lost me at 17.5m thick

[@ShaunKVideos]

This watch beats at 28,800, not 25,200 how you described. For as many facts that you have and your unnecessary amount of exaggerated vocabulary, I thought you would at least get the beat rate correct. As a side note, it’s odd how you always hold your review watches against your wrist ... even with the rubber strap watches which you can easily put on without holding it with your other hand.

[@Mightyslinn]

Actually the beat rate is 25k he is correct!

[@ShaunKVideos]

@@Mightyslinn, wrong. The Omega 9900 movement has a 28,800 beat rate. Look it up and you will see that you failed. I’m curious as to why you believe it was 25,200 anyway. Baffling to say the least. Get your facts together there buddy then come back here.

[@Mightyslinn]

@@ShaunKVideos I have just looked it up, it appears that I had mixed it up with an older and different Omega movement, you are correct the 9900 does have 28k beat rate.

[@sac_fijian6314]

Why dont u make your own video and let others judge u? Randoms becoming "internet critics" and nothing to add other than toxic useless comments. Dont like the video? move on.

[@ShaunKVideos]

@@sac_fijian6314, I’m not toxic in the least bit. This guy who made the video clearly has a problem with facts and it’s amazing that he gets it wrong on every Omega he reviews with this movement. Furthermore, it’s quite funny that this numb nut who made the video … whatever his name is (I don’t care) doesn’t respond to any comments on here or offers any attempt at a rebuttal because he knows he messed up or for some odd reason is doing it intentionally.

[@jonathannguyen8546]

Hi

[@skycorrigan6511]

Thicc boy