Omega Seamaster VERSUS Omega Seamaster? Which Seamaster Diver is the King of Omega?

When selecting an Omega Seamaster you have a surprising amount of choices, but the two most popular models are probably the Omega Seamaster Diver 300m Professional and the Omega Seamaster 300 Heritage. And, when it comes time to pick one, which is the King of all Omega Seamasters?
Shop Omega at Exquisite Timepieces: www.exquisitet...
Contact Exquisite Timepieces at:
Email - [e-mail]
Phone - [phone]
4380 Gulfshore Blvd., N. Suite 800
Naples, FL 34103
This video is presented by Exquisite Timepieces, a sponsor and partner of the JustBlueFish Watch Reviews KZbin channel. Partners and sponsors of the channel loan products for review or provide compensation for promoting their brand, but as always the opinions found in the product review are unbiased and authentic.
#Omega #Seamaster #Diver

[@JustBlueFish]

Shop Omega at Exquisite Timepieces (my channel partner): www.exquisitetimepieces.com/search?q=omega+seamaster

[@dcchris5082]

I bought the Heritage Model when it first came out. It was the second watch I purchased from my AD when I was building a spend history to so at some point in the future I could get considered for Rolexes and not have to go to the Gray Market. I love this watch, I wear it more than any Rolex I own. The thing I think you missed on your excellent review, is the watch is flat out Cool, but doesn’t look like a flex. You just feel great wearing it.

[@user-md3rb6uz6b]

Facts!

[@gburlin]

I got the 300 heritage in blue recently and it’s simply elegant with a little bit of flash. Dinner lights throw a dark lust purple at the right angle that is very pleasing highlighted by the fotina markers that gives a great color palette match😉

[@libartstech]

As someone who likes earth tones and vintage-inspired pieces, the Heritage gets my vote.

[@JustBlueFish]

It's very nice, don't get me wrong. I just have such a hard time seeing any detail in the dial. Maybe my vision is really getting worse than I thought?

[@libartstech]

@@JustBlueFish That’s a perfectly valid point. I haven’t worked up the justification to buy either yet, so maybe my preferences will change once my money is on the line.

[@alanboomer6538]

I bought the heritage in blue a few weeks ago. I actually love how the dial changes depending on the angle that its looked at. It is a stunning shade of blue and I love that it isn't instantly recognisable as a Seamaster due to the lack of helium escape valve. Very classy, very understated. Quiet luxury and what a movement.

[@JustBlueFish]

No helium escape valve is a plus.

[@lachlansteffen1665]

Heritage all day every day and twice on Sundays

[@jeremyschmitz5954]

Have both, love both. Like my two favorites in my collection.

[@TheBimmer74]

I have the Seamaster 300M and I did purchase it from Exquisite Timepieces. It is an amazing watch and worth every penny!

[@JustBlueFish]

Nice, glad to hear it. Enjoy it!

[@chi-towncalifornia5916]

If I’m honest, the too-large size and the lack of bracelet taper really hold back the Seamaster Pro, and the high price for a retro Seamaster 300 Heritage are both why I’d rather buy a Tudor Pelagos 39, or a Black Bay 58, if the latter would come with the T-Fit clasp. I always feel like there’s a fly in the ointment with Seamasters.

[@JustBlueFish]

Omega needs a 39mm Seamaster Pro, with a 47mm wingspan, and a bit of taper on the bracelet, and I'm a buyer if it stays under $6k.

[@sennaracinglegend1438]

Tudor is viewed as the poor man's rolex, so that gets me away from the brand.

[@steves8322]

I bought the heritage in black…wears better, no date, better movement with hour jumping feature and double barrels, tapered bracelet and lumed bezel all did it for me. The dial furniture is obviously snazzier on the pro and that is the only reason I could’ve been swayed. That is what we are looking at most of the time anyway but went for the 300.

[@gigamoment]

The Seamaster Pro Diver is stunning. I think it will be iconic when the years passes

[@JustBlueFish]

I think it already is!

[@bradleypariah]

I just ordered a Seamaster blue pro/wave dial & hands, but I'm going to put them in a 43mm Submariner case, and it's going to run off a Miyota movement. I AM UNGOVERNABLE.

[@JustBlueFish]

At least go with a Sellita movement.

[@bradleypariah]

@@JustBlueFish - No way. Bulova Gang. Blood in, blood out, homie. CACK CACK.

[@terryjones5339]

I prefer a coin edge bezel over the scallop style. Much easier to rotate. The “Pro” with a coin edge would be fantastic.

[@JustBlueFish]

Yeah, I do too kind of prefer that bezel edge.

[@bber45]

Fair Point. I have a 7 1/2 inch wrist and the Omegas SMP 300 fits me perfect. Yes it is a bit chunkier but not Invicta chunky. I get a ton of compliments on it too. I have owned a Rolex sub 16610 and it was my first Rolex I ever bought when I was in my early 20's. (yes at discount like the old timers brag about). I enjoyed it very much but I could never get a modern/current sub. No plane jane sub is worth 10k and the current one are much beefier than the older models. Plus, it does get boring seeing everyone rocking a Rolex Sub and is a big buzz kill.

[@JustBlueFish]

I think 7" and above wrists will love the SMP 300, and honestly even smaller if the guy (or gal) likes a bit of a beefier look. I tend to prefer slim and streamlined watches which the Heritage model has - but the dial is just a deal killer for me.

[@bber45]

@@JustBlueFish yeah that's why I like the old school Sub. Has more of a slimmer feel and look to it. Even though the current sub tried to fix that, it's still chunky IMO. You can tell too when all the young skinny kids are rocking a current sub trying to flex. Looks like they need two hands just to lift it up to show it lol. Have you tried the new/current Speedy? I believe they tapered the bracelet and slimmed it down a bit.

[@underachievingwatchcollect1878]

The best Omega Seamaster imho is the 165.024 big triangle. Hopefully someday Omega reintroduces an updated version.

[@JustBlueFish]

That one is cool, but not my favorite.

[@ias3068]

You said it correctly. Side by side heritage looks bland. I picked pro model for that reason. For my wrist size pro is very comfortable to wear all day. The size is perfect a smaller watch will look odd with proportion. Tudor 39 mm will be the choice for many with 6.5 inch wrist.

[@marcuslieberman3577]

Good Video Guy- I love the Heritage. However, I do have the 2222.80 36mm Pro. Circa '06. I would not trade it for all the money in the world(almost). Your comments on the them both are valid. They are both the best value for money. If you were "lucky" to get a Rolex early on Good for You!

[@JustBlueFish]

That '06 SM sounds awesome, enjoy that!

[@sumitkar8146]

I really looked at both prior to purchasing my white dial SMP300 which I love. The heritage is a beautiful piece but much more vintage. The AR coating on the SMP is much better and the look was more me. I am not so much a vintage guy which the heritage clearly leans toward. Both are spectacular pieces- I am a bigger guy and the SMP suited me more

[@JustBlueFish]

Good choice! Thanks for sharing.

[@anthonystevens8683]

Nice one Guy! It's great to see a review that is objective although there will always be some spots of subjective elements. That you can recommend the SM300M on its merits even though its not one that works for you due to its physical size and aesthetic should be applauded. You also admitted the 180 degree switch in preference once you had the two watches side by side, again a noble admission. We all see spec sheets, videos and photos of watches and some will form a view that will be cast in stone but once seen in real life and tried on the wrist opinions can change. When the current SM300M was released some years ago I have to admit that I wasn't a fan..... until I saw one in the flesh and it blew me away what the difference in seeing the watch in real life compared to photos could be. I ended up with a purchase of the white dial version. I also like the 300 classic or heritage and it's a great watch in its own right and I would love one but it's unlikely to take much wrist time away from my SM300M and that for me is a good reason why it's not on my watch 'watch list'. Many thanks for sharing.

[@JustBlueFish]

A review can never be 100% objective, and I don't aim for that as a goal. When I like something, a lot of the reasons why I like it will be subjective. But I try to explain my thought process and hopefully viewers can relate to what I'm saying and use that information to make their own decisions.

[@NikonFM2n]

The Helium valve knob is a no go for me.

[@C.frmMia]

Way to rep Go Fins ! 👍 also own the "Seitona" solar and it's my daily(most days). Wear it more than my SMP300 chrome dial w blue accents (But they're obviously totally different watches) - Love em both

[@chia-mingyang5804]

Heritage for me in almost every aspect

[@JustBlueFish]

It is really nice I don't blame you.

[@TinBin-Craig]

love both of them... but for me the omega 300 the white dial... cheers

[@JustBlueFish]

The white one is nice.

[@GeordsYouTube]

The ref 2262.50.00 seamaster would be my choice, mid size black dial from early 2000s

[@JustBlueFish]

I haven't seen that one in person. It's smaller right, like 36mm? Or am I thinking of something else.

[@GeordsYouTube]

Yeah it’s the 36mm with triangle marker at 12 and batons for the rest rather than dots like most of the seamster 300s

[@anthonyoquendo5197]

Great video as always, what are your thoughts on the new 75th Aniversary Summer blue Seamaster 300 heritage with its gradient dial and baby blue markers? Would that improve legibility? IMHO I think it would, and I think it's the best looking shade of blue of the bunch🔥🔥🔥.. it would be cool if you can do a review on the whole Seamaster 75th Aniversary collection.. We the Omega fans would appreciate it.. thanks brother! 💪⌚️😃🤘

[@JustBlueFish]

Not sure, looking forwards to seeing one in person.

[@kaczynski2333]

The Heritage is all class; and you can wear it with a suit. Now, if I were a commercial diver, I probably wouldn't buy the pro model; I'd probably buy an Echo/neutra.

[@CombatRat]

It amazes me how a brand like Omega, that has so many SKUs, doesn't have a smaller size option for the Seamaster 300 Professional. Pretty much every other model they make has at least two sizes. I've tried on the white dial SMP 300 a few times and I love the look of it. I could pull it off, but I'm not going to spend $5k+ on a watch that I wished was smaller. You've got to think Omega is aware of the clamor for a smaller size and will release it sooner than later. Otherwise, Tudor is absolutely going to eat their lunch on the 40 and under side of things. Case in point, my money will go to a Pelagos 39 eventually if Omega doesn't release a smaller version.

[@adamsmithproperties2528]

Great content

[@JustBlueFish]

Thank you

[@lesliewattkis1431]

Great review

[@barryvercueil2346]

Brilliant video. I'd buy the professional if it wasn't for the silly helium escape valve.

[@JustBlueFish]

Thanks 👍

[@mrknobchopps]

I own them both and no one seems to mention that the pro weighs a lot more than the heritage

[@MadMax76er]

How do you go about building a relationship with a local dealership to borrow watches and what are the insurance issues that come from you borrowing these pieces? Are they display models? Seen a few channels have this sort of relationship, and it's always interested me how it's come about and the trust element of the arrangement👍

[@JustBlueFish]

After a couple years, once my channel reached a decent size, I just reached out to a few dealers I knew were good and reputable, and introduced myself and asked if we could work together. I've had a few different dealers loan me watches, but Exquisite Timepieces does far more than any others - probably because they are 5 miles from my house.

[@MadMax76er]

@@JustBlueFish do you get worried that something might happen to the watches while you have them? I'd be terrified

[@steveb4012]

I have the "Goldeneye" Quartz ( shock horror) version of the 300m, 41mn, nice and slim, %925 when I bought it back in 2006. I cannot see any good reason whatsoever to replace it with almost £6k's worth of auto chunk! I like the 300 but for someone with a visual disability, legibility is essential and I'm dissapointed to hear its an issue on the 300. I like the Spectre version of this watch but no way am I paying £8-£9k for one.

[@JustBlueFish]

There’s no shame in a Quartz model, wear it proudly.

[@Leftystrat]

Diver pro, simple, iconic,winner!

[@ducuBAR]

If the Pro model would have been in 39mm, it would be perfect for me.

[@traviswatts6661]

The Professional wears better on the factory rubber strap.

[@martinharrison4245]

I think the problem with the 300 pro or heritage is they are just too thick and bulky. The tudor bb 58 is a good shout , because it ticks the boxes for most people, although a tad boring. My personal favourite is the seiko 62mas models , like the sla017 and 043. The movement might not be as accurate as the omega or tudor, but the build quality is better than either, imo. If seiko had done the 62mas on a bracelet with a t fit clasp , in various colours, as their flagship diver at under 5k , then they could have blown the swiss out of the water.

[@gavinBsussex]

Sorry buddy, but I own two prospex Seikos and they are lovely watches but there is no way they are better built than the Omega Smp300 or the Tudor Black Bay which I also own. Omega's quality is leagues ahead in every way. Now Grand Seiko build amazing and exceptional watches but standard Seikos cannot hold a light to Tudor or Omega. There is a reason they are more expensive than Seiko and that is because of the better build quality, better movement etc

[@martinharrison4245]

@@gavinBsussex prospex and sla models are completely different levels. The sla models are basically a grand seiko in fit and finish. Unless you have experienced one, in reality , then you cant compare. I own tudors and have experienced many omegas , and I stand by what ive said. Have you actually experienced a sla043 for example ?

[@gavinBsussex]

@@martinharrison4245 yes I tried on a SLA043 at a local AD as I was interested in the hype behind the watch last year and the watch is great but without a bracelet I don’t think it is worth the money they want for it. I always feel it is easier to make a watch without a bracelet to seem high quality as you only have the dial, bezel and case to concentrate on. Seiko as a company make great watches but the bracelets always let them down - same with Grand Seiko - amazing watches sub par bracelets. I am glad you like your SLA043 but I would not trade in my Omega Seamaster for one as the overall aesthetics and quality of the SMP300 on a bracelet is far superior to my mind.

[@gothops154]

Man I can’t believe you think the SMP wears large, I feel that it wears small due to its lug to lug, more like a 40mm than a 42

[@martinkaplan1805]

Thanks, Guy. I looked at both before I decided on the white SMP300, but besides all the points you make, I couldn’t see paying more for the Heritage, which I thought was lovely, but bland in comparison.

[@JustBlueFish]

Good choice! I know lots of people have gone that route.

[@snapfitness1]

I find nothing wrong with the bracelet and don't find it big at all. More like an ideal size. I'm also not a big fan of extreme tappered bracelets. Not very comfortable on my wrist.

[@JustBlueFish]

That's fair, and I'm sure tons of people like it as is. And I'm not saying it's bad, I just prefer them with some taper. Still, it is excellent.

[@snapfitness1]

@@JustBlueFish fair enough. Well done on the video as well.

[@papalapopolo5907]

Go Dolphins 🐬.Greetings from Germany. ✌️

[@JustBlueFish]

Thanks for watching!

[@papalapopolo5907]

@@JustBlueFishno, thank you :) I really enjoy your channel. 🤙

[@tachillecremonini387]

Per non fare un torto a nessuno li comprerei entrambi....

[@JustBlueFish]

Good idea.

[@rustydrog]

The seamaster Pro will age horribly. It's gonna look very garish in a few years time

[@favoritethings3065]

The Heritage Seamaster all day without even enjoyIng your video. I don’t care for the glitzy bracelet of the diver, nor the completely useless and unsightly He escape valve.

[@jonworkman1700]

The Seamaster Diver 300m Professional is one of the ugliest watches on the market.

[@gigamoment]

Why?

[@JustBlueFish]

nah, it looks great imo.

[@jonworkman1700]

@@gigamoment Well, the helium valve obviously, the daft clunky hands and the ludicrous dial pattern.

[@gigamoment]

@@jonworkman1700 so you do prefer a common style watch without something unique or destinctive to it? Think about this... It's all about authenticity and character