Again, Great comparison! Thank you very much. Neither is a bad choice. I pick the Tudor, cleaner not so cluttered look.
@LuisFranciscoAguilar5 жыл бұрын
BB Chrono has it for me in this case. They made a good and new looking watch taking great elements of the past with it's own identity, crisis it's in our minds haha. The snowflake maybe a disadvantage cause makes the chrono function harder to read sometimes, but overall it's a better watch. It's a water resistant racing piece. Will be appreciated in the future, like all the good things. Great vid Tim!
@ssvs04855 жыл бұрын
Nicer bracelet on the Omega. Nicer clasp on the Omega. Nicer movement on the Omega. A useable bezel on the Omega. Personally like the design and dial better so easy win Omega.
@ssvs04855 жыл бұрын
Dapdoi Ardon Doable ;)
@wisfanatic5 жыл бұрын
Yeah but the Omega is twice the price MSRP.
@robdavis12485 жыл бұрын
The Tudor just looks dam cool and I just can love the Omega and I own two from the brand.
@hamradiojunkie15613 жыл бұрын
I have a Tudor Black Bay Chrono. Granted it is just recently been replaced by the new version which has a fancy bezel, a red tipped chronograph second hand and panda dials. Yet I find this watch to be extremely classy much more so than the Omega chronograph. And, I find this watch can be worn as an every day go to work in your suit or casual attire watch with the Oyster bracelet where as I find the Omega to be more of a casual dive watch (like a Tag/Heuer Aquracer, albeit not a as accurate or having a column wheel movement). I have found this Tudor Black Bay chrono to be an extremely accurate movement. It has proven to be accurate to 2 seconds per week which is much more accurate than would be expected for a Tudor COSC movement and possibly even more than a Rolex. It also has a column wheel movement. In light of the new released version, I picked up my Tudor Black Bay Chrono for a sizable discount. I have no regret here by buying the Tudor!
@SP-pn7xx5 жыл бұрын
Omega for sure. I've sold both of these watches at different dealers and you could never get the Tudor out of the cabinet, while this particular Seamaster really sings to people. Upgrade to the PUSH clasp taken from the Speedmaster Mark II and you're laughing
@exoticalover36154 жыл бұрын
I own a blue Omega Seamaster like that. The most beautiful diverswatch out there, simply timeless. The only watch I wear daily.
@1ntel115 жыл бұрын
Omega takes the cake for sure
@teamloony5 жыл бұрын
The Omega all day long, gonna buy this watch for myself this Xmas
@highnrising5 жыл бұрын
With the fixed tachymeter bezel and thin hands, that Tudor Black Bay chronograph is most likely competing with various Omega Speedmaster models, rather than with the massive, rotating-dive-bezel Seamaster.
@MrJSTroy5 жыл бұрын
Tudor for on the leather strap The Omega looks to busy and the helium escape valve is just off putting to me
@joeallfrontsquiet87974 жыл бұрын
I got the Omega. The much more interesting, and better looking watch.
@Khanh.Nguyen3695 жыл бұрын
Went straight for Tudor just based on looks.
@davec36515 жыл бұрын
Very difficult for me to rate a lateral system over a chrono with vertical clutch. Very difficult. Micro adjust holes in the Tudor clasp are more useful than the dive extension in the Omega. However as another mentioned, there is possible Omega clasp upgrade to one with slider micro adjust. This Tudor looks more elegant, refined, versatile. More historically enduring and iconic or not, I think this bulbous Omega chronograph is an eyesore, to be honest.
@valentinhe16753 жыл бұрын
The Tudor also has a silicon hairspring
@RobertTimarMD2 жыл бұрын
At cca. 5:52 it looks like the Omega chono minute hand forgot to advance.
@nickbrooker14115 жыл бұрын
If the BB had a divers bezel then it would be a slightly closer contest. As it is the SMP easily beats the confused BB which doesn’t know what its trying to be! A better contest would be the BB up against the Omega Speedy - which the Speedy would easily win too!
@richardgreen89193 жыл бұрын
Both impressive watches.Loved your video,as usual,so informative.Keep them coming and stay safe.
@markschwartz57025 жыл бұрын
Yes the Omega is nice but I can't wear a watch with a wart on it. I bought the Tudor.
@robertleal95465 жыл бұрын
Man I own that exact omega and it is awesome . So clean with that sapphire that gloss in the dial. I agree with you man . Tudor looks confused
@alejandrolanatta41855 жыл бұрын
something to mention , the omega dont have jumping minutes , the tudor yes , is a breitling movement , I think the tudor movement from breitling is a better muvement !!!! and another thing , the tudor dont having a rotating bezel and that make it more versatle , you can put it on a leather strap for daily use for dont scrach the bracelet , if you put the omega in a leather strap is not going to work really nice , diver on leather is not nice !!
@yaaxarr89772 жыл бұрын
Omega Seamaster hands down !! Great Chrono !!
@ntahapapa015 жыл бұрын
I'm a bit confuse, is Tudor Black Bay is a divers' watch?
@leeonr5 жыл бұрын
Tudor Daytona looks great
@hikingpipes69115 жыл бұрын
Looks much more like the Omega 9300: www.omegawatches.com/en-us/watch-omega-speedmaster-moonwatch-omega-co-axial-chronograph-44-25-mm-31130445101002
@fpoynton16045 жыл бұрын
I absolutely love Tudor especially the snowflake hands however the SM w flowing sculpted case and high contrasting indices, ink well deep dial tone - pop of red. Wow. Thanks Tim - both pieces are beautiful but of different flavors .
@robertschriek13533 жыл бұрын
Whats the point of measuring up to 45 mins on the Tudor .... the sm goes up to 12 hours
@FirestormAA5 жыл бұрын
Tim do u need to make us all so torn between 2 awesome timepieces? Lol..... damn I love both brands! ....... I hv to go with...... gosh! .......forget it I take both cos frankly I owned both. Both of them is so bang for buck timepieces. Both Omega & Tudor are awesome brand. I think Tim did one hell of a good job becos u got me so torn!!!!! Lol Good job Tim & team.
@steve_troy5 жыл бұрын
The two-tone Black Bay is a far nicer looking piece than the steel. Omega takes it for me in this one.
@klauswhitedreamer5 жыл бұрын
Omega, my love !
@Walevolence5 жыл бұрын
For the Tudor BBChrono, if only they replace the hour hand with a semi-skeletonised hour hand, it'll be a good chrono-diver watch.
@koolpep5 жыл бұрын
I love the 3 hand SMP 300M (and have one) but Chrono wise Tudor is the better Chrono, that’s why I bought it.
@moreonfeet10405 жыл бұрын
Tudor over omega any day
@DavidDatura5 жыл бұрын
The Tudor is the more stylish, modern looking watch. The lighting here is not good, seemingly overexposed and diffuse. Are you guys using a new setup? If so, it needs tweaking. Cold white LEDs (if used here) are not complementary to the products you’re displaying here...it ‘s quite bad, really!
@SharapovaFan5 жыл бұрын
I have the Black Bay Chrono and I'm looking to get the 44 mm variant of the SMP chronograph before Omega phases it out. I'm having second thoughts though. As much as I love the SMP chronograph's design, I can't shake this feeling that I should get the Planet Ocean chronograph instead. P.S. Please fix your studio setup. This piss poor lighting isn't doing any favors to the nice watches being featured. It makes them look absolutely dull. I can produce a nicer looking video with just my Note 9 and V20 with a half-assed lighting setup. Won't even need to color grade it to look better.
@souknara11004 жыл бұрын
Omega Seamster all the way!!! No second thoughts at all!!!!
@menaseven90935 жыл бұрын
I am choosing the Omega over the Tudor because the Omega is more beautiful, a bigger brand and more glamorous because associated with the James bond movie. I like the Omega engraved back and the beautiful dial. I like the Omega modern tech like the silicon hairspring and coaxial escapement.
@the1916companywatchreviews5 жыл бұрын
The 007 affiliation is quite understandable. Thanks for sharing your reasoning as to why you select the Omega! Thank you kindly! - WatchBox Team
@BenTramer5 жыл бұрын
I would buy the Pro 300m over the Tudor.
@thegraciefighter1023 жыл бұрын
Never does the HEV look more ridiculous than on the Seamaster Chrono.
@b00shay4 жыл бұрын
Looks alone Tudor wins 👍🏼
@juliodelavega79023 жыл бұрын
I will chose the Tudor. But the gold and stainless
@keitumetsemabuza99405 жыл бұрын
The Tudor takes it for me
@Rangerglx3 жыл бұрын
Omega by a bit. Classic!
@raman61162 жыл бұрын
Tudor looks hella nice but I am an omega man and sea master guy. So omega for me
@garryhall96603 жыл бұрын
the tudor is definitely more refined.
@andrei20235 жыл бұрын
Tudor🏆🥇
@TravelsChases5 жыл бұрын
The Omega wins at first sight
@ulisesalmoinadelcueto42763 жыл бұрын
I pick the TUDOR !!!
@markymark35725 жыл бұрын
Omega for me. The Tudor looks like it's trying too hard to be retro.
@bubbab77925 жыл бұрын
Cannot divide. Where's lunch? 🤔😁😁😁
@benevolentautore44634 жыл бұрын
Jethro Tull likes the Tudor. ;-)
@pedrosaenz28005 жыл бұрын
Black Bay seems to be more reliable for under water use in my opinion. Why ? The Omegas have a not good reputation as watertight watches. Speedy and Flightmaster had issues with water compared to any of the Oyster cases.
@sportster883able5 жыл бұрын
Pedro. Omegas do not have a good reputation as watertight watches???? By what measure??? You do know, of course, that neither the Speedmaster nor Flightmaster were diving watches!!!!!! What about the Seamaster 300m? Or the Planet Ocean 600m? Or the Ploprof 1200m?? Furthermore, there is no such thing as 'watertightness' in relation to watches. Water resistance is the terminology - the word 'resistance' gives it away. I have come to the conclusion that you have no idea what you are talking about and therefore shouldn't be expressing an opinion in this respect.
@the1916companywatchreviews5 жыл бұрын
I think you nailed it, Ian. Comparing a Flightmaster or Speedmaster pilot's watch from 40 years ago to a modern screw-down crown Tudor sports watch isn't realistic. I wore my Seamaster Diver 300M through a month of Navy survival-swim instruction plus 3rd and 2nd class swim tests with no issues. Plenty of people historically and recently have used Omega dive watches with zero concerns about water intrusion. Best, Tim
@jmc91805 жыл бұрын
I don't get why divers have chronos...
@keitumetsemabuza99405 жыл бұрын
Extra selling point to most non diving buyers
@SP-pn7xx5 жыл бұрын
As you descend every several meters or so, you need to pause and allow your body to compress. This takes 60 seconds, so there's one reason. I find the combo more useful for cooking ;)
@nickbrooker14115 жыл бұрын
SP nope, incorrect! You dont need to pause to ‘compress’ on a descent!
@joeallfrontsquiet87973 жыл бұрын
The Omega is the more clunky, forward, aggressive-looking design of the two. Preferred!
@marksman40045 жыл бұрын
I'd take the omega.
@totisanchez36075 жыл бұрын
The Omega over the one with the identity crisis which I view as a result of the marketing department
@sp3584594 жыл бұрын
Omega all day long
@gbtriumph32165 жыл бұрын
RE: Tudor Breitling: Its an overpriced Planet Ocean bi-compax Chronograph wannabe. Wait until you scratch the Tudor bezel. The disappointment will be large.
@bigmike35415 жыл бұрын
This one is easy-I pick neither
@wilbervidal183 жыл бұрын
Omega
@deltropico75 жыл бұрын
The Seamaster is way cluttered; has one too many pushers, dial way saturated.
@patrickcadette5 жыл бұрын
😁😁😁👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻..omega
@lion5352-z1s4 жыл бұрын
Tudor is better in all ways
@chubbychicken55855 жыл бұрын
Tudor, the Rolex of poor common people...
@davidofglenbrook44875 жыл бұрын
Neither of these are particularly nice. For a Chrono, give me a Speedy any day...and if I have the coin the Daytona.