OMG. 540Hz Monitors are Actually Worth It

[@ZachsTechTurf]

Original Video: kzbin.info/www/bejne/pKLEaISMrMuobdUsi=PJCFdAXvQmLGhQbc @OptimumTech

[@randomgdyoutuber6538]

Btw links in shorts are defunct, KZbin made it so that they don't work. On mobile at least

[@VanadiumMC]

chicken nuggets

[@stellerate]

​@@randomgdyoutuber6538probably because of bots

[@YuvrajSingh-bo4sy]

Which processor should my friend pair with GT610 his budget is 5000INR $60 And half is spent on that graphics card please tell a processor that can run gta v

[@CheesyBoi69]

yo can you give me a pc i need my first one badly :(

[@2ndSite]

me with my 60hz 10year old monitor: cool cool, but is your monitor also a radiator?

[@wzpFN]

Real.

[@zp1ro495]

Same

[@MarcoWieler-b6c]

Ha only a radiador my laptop is a air plane 😅

[@goodbug53]

TRUE i got a farely good pc, but i got my moniter from a literally stourgage room, it works but its 59 hz

[@MarcoWieler-b6c]

Plane not olane

[@averagecircleclicker6486]

Bouta have a monitor cost as much as a PC

[@EgeQaqd]

Lol more

[@chrispeters8555]

They already exist lol… some of those ultra wide 240hz monitors are already over 1000 dollars!

[@dripdripsplash]

oled makes this statement very true

[@zagaraditya890]

​@@dripdripsplasheven 1k$ PC wont run games at 540 fps, you're going to need more

[@XeqtrM1]

Not worth it because it's TN

[@vincecs]

after getting a 540Hz Monitor the next step is getting consistent ~540fps

[@flowerofash4439]

Lol nobody talk about this

[@OGBouncin94]

the real question right here

[@Couragenotthedog]

I doubt it’s hard to achieve with a high end pc. I get around 150 in 4k with max graphics

[@alexyps2155]

Bro if you have the money for a 540hz monitor it means that u definitely have the money for an rtx4090 which easily gets 540 fps on every game low settings.

[@Sn4p_Fps]

@@alexyps2155no the 4090 won’t get 540 on every game

[@Demidar665]

Nothing will ever replace the feeling of going 60-144 hz Ever

[@tarekcat1]

Exactly 60 is the bare minimum you could have While 144 is just enough

[@xXtuscanator22Xx]

Yeah 144-165hz is like the ideal gaming refresh rate. 540hz is such overkill 😭

[@Kerttis]

@@xXtuscanator22Xx how is worse ideal lmao, that literally makes no sense

[@AegisEdge]

@@Kerttis you make no sense. Nobody can even see the difference in 500hz. Let alone 160. 240 is the best you can while not being too ridiculous

[@ivanas7918]

​@@KerttisI had a 240hz monitor for a while and I switched to 360 and guess what? ZERO DIFFERENCE swear to God. I tried so much to actually notice the difference but it is nearly impossible

[@H29900]

Gotta uprgrade my nervous system before i buy it

[@JaymayTV]

Get that Sandevistan

[@RebornCommas00]

Chrome up choom

[@ericmamleev]

*Friends, I did 19 pull-ups on one arm, please support me*

[@zeekmuniz1663]

Lmfaooo bruh yall got me dying over here😂😂😂😂😂☠️☠️☠️

[@SadTown99]

Not getting shit until you pay Vic his eddies, this ain’t charity.

[@CatboyJordan]

Wait till geometry dash players get their hands on this

[@kyioriq]

oh god... i can imagine bro. i just rediscovered my reply under this comment, screw rob for forcing a 240 tps...

[@slerpn]

We need 540 fps to verify silent circles

[@JoopiterGD]

Its not like it would be allowed anyways. People would still have to force it to 360 or 240 due to anything above that breaking the game to a point that is unusable.

[@CatboyJordan]

@@JoopiterGD No??? Thats fps not refresh rate. And also the physics don’t change they just make the animations weird.

[@aerialz7175]

​@@CatboyJordanyou could argue the physics do change because of frame alignment

[@Valthe50Cal]

I remember when 240 hz was considered completely overkill

[@CaioPBD]

Its not anymore? Wow i cant keep up with this 😂

[@aydenmartin5650]

it still is considered and is completely overkill

[@maxschaefbauer5601]

@@aydenmartin5650you clearly haven’t used it then

[@aydenmartin5650]

i have. i have used every hz refresh rat emonitor up to 360 extensively lol. It doesnt make you better, you wont climb from 120-240hz. It is just copium dogshit players give themselves as an excuse.@@maxschaefbauer5601

[@filipivan5125]

240hz is overkill unles the quality and price matches 144hz then go for it. Shroud was part of the 60hz-360Hz test on LinusTech. Feel like they need to do an update.

[@KikoBG12]

Moving from 75 to 144 was the most insane change ill never forget it

[@reinhardt_tv]

eeeeh? It looks like marketing to me

[@thevoidbeckons]

@@reinhardt_tv try a high refresh monitor. I went from 60 to 75 and that was night and day, then 75 to 165 and that was even more drastic. You can see the difference with your eyes, it's so much more smooth.

[@rndmbs]

@@reinhardt_tv Then you have never tried a high refresh rate monitor

[@reinhardt_tv]

@@thevoidbeckons this „smoothness“ is useless, especially considering that the resolution is like… super low, to have good picture you need at least 4K (better 5K)

[@reinhardt_tv]

@@rndmbs I did and those don’t have good picture quality

[@LandoCali5]

Serious advantage when you put it at 0.005 times speed

[@Magentawow]

Pov you've never used a high refresh rate monitor

[@netbat4399]

imagine image is real when we see 4k 1ghz screen

[@throbbingshaft]

@@Magentawowbro I went from 30hz on a mac to 300hz and the refresh rate it so high it hurts my head

[@huckleberryjam4975]

Me when I talk about things I have no knowledge about

[@Magentawow]

brother is bullshitting out his ass literally @@throbbingshaft

[@dbnsowyradzik3151]

In 2030 we are gonna see videos like "GUYS! THIS BRAND NEW 1500HZ MONITOR IS A NEW MUST-HAVE FOR GAMING!"

[@tickymyname9101]

Jeez zero replies maybye all bots we will never know 🌴🎉😆

[@Bompaka]

2030 i would haev at least 144hz for sure

[@dbnsowyradzik3151]

@@tickymyname9101 belive me or not, I dont use bots and im not a bot as well :)

[@oko83]

the more the hertz, the less the noticeable difference so i doubt they keep getting higher

[@chocho6766]

Nah 540hz is the max human eye can see

[@OnFight1997]

Me on 60hz realizing these guys are getting 9x more refreshes than me. ☠️

[@Hufi2.]

They see you walking around a corner 2 business days before you see them

[@StrandedClone]

@@Hufi2.sadly yeah

[@Joeshmoe2579]

I mean just going to 144hz is pretty neat

[@ARandomGuy7127]

@@Joeshmoe2579i have a 144 hz monitor but my cable doesn’t “support” 144 hz

[@Joeshmoe2579]

@@ARandomGuy7127 A display port cable is like 6-10 usd. I thought they usually come with one when you buy a 144hz monitor.

[@jswasda]

I will never forget the feeling of moving from 75hz to 180hz

[@thehobbist5544]

FOR REAL BRO I just made that same change probably 20 minutes ago and im still astonished

[@RemedieX]

​​@@thehobbist5544 Enjoy it! It's amazing but if you ever have to go back, it'll really suck. I've spoiled my eyes and now 60-75hz looks super choppy to me. Even on my phone and TV 😂 but it's much more passable in these cases since I'm not constantly inputting actions or am required to be focused on what I'm seeing like when playing games.

[@Ricedigga14]

KZbin shorts 30 fps cap: 🗿

[@heheheha5139]

60Fps Cap🗿

[@Capten_Ussop]

It is slow mochen lamo

[@Ricedigga14]

@@Capten_Ussop shorts has a 30fps cap

[@shadeshotTV]

​@@Ricedigga14 and that doesnt mean anything in this context. recorded at high framerates and played back at 30fps for slow motion, you can clearly see the different "smoothness" in each refreshrate

[@vidnamii]

@@Ricedigga14nah it’s 60fps cap look at the stats

[@ToxicBleach4325]

Gamers when the enemy stays on screen for about 0,000000132 seconds more: *shut up and take my money*

[@ItalianoDio-]

Use a period..not a comma. 🤦🏻‍♂️

[@doomguy974]

​@@ItalianoDio-might be from a country where they use commas instead of periods.

[@JackDoe-rr3os]

When your playing against someone at 240 hertz its gonna make you faster everyone split second counts

[@Ilija-uc6nz]

@@JackDoe-rr3os 240hz wont fix ur skill issue lol just get better instead of spending thousands of dollars more

[@dinosharttt]

actually 0,000000132 seconds less

[@XX_10101]

And here I am using a 60hz monitor, like a human being that isn't a millionaire

[@kaitogg322]

144 hz cost like 100$ recently,, so going up of that its not a millionaire thing anymore lol

[@XX_10101]

@@kaitogg322 yh , I just use an old 1080p tv

[@XX_10101]

@@kaitogg322 😭

[@XX_10101]

@@kaitogg322 but I plan on saving up for a 165hz 1440p monitor, so fingers crossed

[@obamabinbiden8108]

​@@XX_10101 I hope you get that 165hz mate👍

[@johnxina2140]

Finally, monitors fast enough to actually simulate the effects of a CRT properly

[@LoudSunshine]

Gamers when a gadget that costs their liver upgrades their performance by 7 milliseconds:

[@ArpanDe]

True

[@caustictoad]

bruh its not even 7, its like 2-3 😭. also 240hz is already incredibly smooth why do people want even more

[@coda72]

​@@caustictoadI see 0 difference between my 75hz and 144hz monitor lmao

[@maherylala2153]

@@coda72 Check your display config xDD

[@shoxerx7406]

@@coda72 idk bout u but 75 to 120 is already an insane difference

[@Alirezarz62]

Here I am with a 144hz monitor thinking it can't be better🤣 Seriously tho the jump from 60hz to 144hz was huge for me

[@FR0STlE]

*meanwhile me stuck at 60Hz:* 🗿

[@Foxy_AR]

144 hz is honestly all that you need

[@Alirezarz62]

@@Foxy_AR yea I aint planning on upgrading yet

[@zxSwifty]

240/360 would be a big jump for you again

[@Alirezarz62]

@@zxSwifty not sure about 360 but 240hz wasn't that much of improvement when I tested it with my friend's monitor it definitely was noticeable but not by much it's like a diminishing returns the higher you go

[@MoonFlux]

I am just gonna tell you all.... this screen won't get you out of bronze.

[@Borlays]

it actually did get me out of bronze. Not this screen but on laptop with max 60hz i was stuck in high bronze low silver for year, when i changed pc with good monitor i reached plat in a week and now i'm in masters.

[@AyKrax]

ong Imma stick with my 28" 4K 144hz 0.5 MS monitor.

[@MoonFlux]

@@Borlays im 100% sure you are trolling. Literally not possible if you actually were trying.

[@VoidHxnter]

​@Borlays Going from 60 to 120 or 144hz does make a massive difference, but you aren't just going to become a god at a game if you're in the lowest ranks with a 60hz. I play rhythm games which need high refresh rates the absolute most and even I cant do that.

[@PatrickArcato]

​@@BorlaysLmao sure you did from bronze to masters ger ourra here man GER OURRA HER

[@runmeramen6106]

Im glad barney takes accountability even if the situation isn't necessarily his fault

[@Luwle]

Now you just need a pc that can pull 540 fps

[@someguywithmtndew5691]

impossible (for other non competitive games), this monitor is only good for easy to run games at low settings

[@Tetraverse]

You will need an RTX 4090 and a Ryzen 7 7800X3D to run 540fps in competitive games, which is kind of a waste of money for 1080p gaming

[@Irishkiwi]

@@Tetraverseyou would probably actually just need a cpu that can boost upto 5 ghz

[@Wattermelondog]

@@Irishkiwino u need a good cpu that can do more then 6, 100-300fps sure u can get that but 500-600fps, most games cant even support that much, i have never seen a game do 600fps unless its csgo and that game is gone and now cs2 is a thing, im not sure about overwatch but cmon.

[@Conrad75]

You still get a lot of benefits from a high refresh rate no matter the fps

[@perialis2970]

at this point the motion blur is integrated in the human eyes

[@nanielwolf5768]

it always was which is why most people hate the option

[@Killluaaa]

​@@nanielwolf5768it is irl but not when you are looking straight forward into a monitor

[@Crowbar]

@@nanielwolf5768 then you have no idea what motion blur is. The effect is there to replicate motion blur from a real camera. It has nothing to do with the human eye.

[@Mr-Nuke.]

​@Crowbar wave your hand fast infront of your eyes real quick

[@nanielwolf5768]

@@Crowbar almost every game is meant to be seen as a footage from a camera, right, got it

[@chipie_guy]

Bros talking trash about a 240hz monitor while im on my 60hz monitor 😂😂😂

[@geoffdb8118]

I took the plunge and went 75Hz, never looked back ...

[@thoktrigg3308]

Everybody told me that switching from 60 to 170 would be crazy for me and way better but idk i dont feel the change that much

[@griffin8511]

​@thoktrigg3308 that's absurd if you don't realize

[@the-nicest-d0g]

@@thoktrigg3308 is your windows settings set to 144hz? Because you have to be blind to not tell a difference between 60 and 144

[@echo-it8rs]

@@thoktrigg3308 you need to change the hz manually btw in your settings any monitor is auto on 60hz

[@medea6341]

To the people thinking you'll "need' this eventually: if you have lightning fast reaction time already then you MIGHT see a minimal difference in gameplay, but a character popping up on screen for a few nanoseconds is not gonna change the outcome. Even 240 is overkill. If youre already on 144 or 165 you dont "need" more than that. And going higher and higher is just gonna be a waste of money. "Every advantage counts" is true but the specific timing is so short and unnoticeable that it will likely make no difference in a wide majority of situations. Still cool to look at the smoothness and realism though.

[@anonhiki]

i have 140ms click reaction time avg on a 240 hz monitor. 540hz is 2x that

[@andreamaral9725]

​@@anonhikiYour reaction time is definitely not 140ms, the fastest reaction times on the planet by F1 players are 200ms, your average human is getting 300ms-400ms, with training and competitive gaming constantly maybe 250-270ms. And also your reaction time won't change because of your monitor, that's YOUR reaction time, not your monitors. If you tested your reaction time and got 140ms you pre-clicked even if not on purpose, 140ms is physically impossible.

[@Marpurrsa]

the main issues i have with a 540 hz screen is: 1. unless you're in the top 0.01% of a game's playerbase, you're not gonna find any use in it 2. 540 hz means you need 540 fps to get the full benefit so unless you're a professional esports player that plays competitions, 540 hz is absolutely useless

[@finn8733]

@@crazct if u play games like csgo or rainbow 6 ofc u have permanent over 300 fps

[@vorkev1]

its not going to make you a better gammer like people think but then again when i play halo online 90% of time i am number 1 10% number 2

[@ast.asutora]

540hz fhd is your best bet if it's absolutely needed no 1440p gaming could reach that fps

[@aouyiu]

​@@crazct because gaming isn't the only benefit, everything else you do on your computer will be at whatever your monitor's hz is.

[@aouyiu]

​@@crazct CS2 is cpu and ram bound btw

[@afikkusan]

Remember : once you go with the "high refresh rate" route, you will not escape

[@sp1du350]

fr now even 144 looks not as smooth to me coming from 240 and thats why im not upgrading further cuz my wallet cant afford 240 frames at wqhd already

[@jefmoesy]

​@@sp1du350meanwhile i play star citizen at 40fps and thinking the gsync makes it look kinda good😅

[@ShatteredF1re7733]

A monitor is basically like a pair of eye glasses. Except the more you pay the clearer you see.

[@YourMother6yrsago]

⁠@@jefmoesymeanwhile me being surprised my pc can even run rdr2 at 10fps

[@RealDennisGGG]

@@sp1du350 Yeah 240hz is more than enough most Pro players can train their eyes up to that but honestly 540hz is something that will make you feel smoother but its actually not because its almost impossible to train your eyes to that point!

[@neilgupta1491]

They used to make us see the same clip when it was 30vs 60 vs 144 hz

[@The_Musicshroom]

just post artificial refresh rates for placebo effect like always. LTT and digital foundry have both covered this same gimmick

[@Iseenoobpeoples]

@@The_Musicshroom Because short don't go above 60Hz so they have to lower the speed for us to see the difference. 60Hz to 144Hz is a huge difference noticeable immediately it will give a big edge to a competitive player.

[@leolandi3852]

Yap yap yap ​@@Iseenoobpeoples

[@MrDeadlyProtocall]

@@Iseenoobpeoples yeah, play read dead 2 max settings on my pc. If you don’t notice the difference between 60hz and 144hz irl then you aren’t looking at the screen 😂

[@Iseenoobpeoples]

@@MrDeadlyProtocall I play CS GO, PUBG, those extra frames helps a lot when you have less then 1 second to react. It also help with RTS games like StarCraft 2, every action is fluid with instant feedback.

[@ofcShiro]

And what game do you plan to run with 540fps? Minecraft + Sodium? Maybe Terraria?

[@johannesschmitz6370]

Prolly lol, overarching maybe cs go

[@cabg7]

dude must have a beast of a computer to be able to get 540 hz worth of gaming

[@BigBlackChicks]

540 FPS*

[@mirainikki6665]

​@@BigBlackChickssame shit to make it worth it

[@DowncastParadox]

To be fair, they only show Overwatch as example, and that game is rather easy on your hardware.

[@user-ke1gn3ql1g]

He does

[@hamett356]

This only could worth for competitive games like cs, valorant or whatever at 1080p with lowest graphics so no need a beast.

[@musicsounder]

Man called me poor in 540 different languages

[@Glubbdubdrib]

Does that mean you have no display?

[@lydiaisbored]

I see what you did there

[@dumbIdiot-r2k]

Funny

[@Rakta_]

540 different frames

[@o_oyash]

1 language 540 times a second

[@bobbygetsbanned6049]

Looking forward to that 540hz 240p gaming.

[@kevinallart6208]

Funny enough, we need monitor capable of more than 900Hz to be able to replicate the "fluidity" of the better crt. I can find the article that spoke about that for those interested but i hope not i m lazy :)

[@cheyhey2170]

@@kevinallart6208 the logic of that afaik is as simplified as "the eye cant see more than 60hz" thing

[@Sadness-Brain]

😂😂😂😂😂❤

[@Vitis-n2v]

​@@cheyhey2170No the reason behind that is that CRTs have virtually no motion blur while LCD panels need technologies to try and hide the natural motion blur they have and especially in shooters it does make a difference.

[@YaBaDji]

🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@trevorjaster4072]

The thing is higher fps don’t make you better 🤷‍♂️ some of the best pros don’t play anywhere near that level of fps because it honestly doesn’t do a whole bunch more for because you are limited in your reaction time anyways

[@eyelesstexas6318]

My brain needs a bios update before I can tell the difference without it being slowed down

[@Rororandd]

Just become geometry dash player

[@MrDeadlyProtocall]

You need to see it irl, these videos can’t really show you how it looks. Smooth as butter

[@garrettsmith6549]

I have used the 540, you can tell the difference. Muscle memory alone wit hsame mouse/keyboard, it feels alien. Like when I jumped from 60hz to 244hz, exact same feeling.

[@WilliamSkafast]

Yup. Bought a 165hz one and can barely tell the difference between that and 60.

[@MrDeadlyProtocall]

@@WilliamSkafast did you make sure to change your windows display settings to 165hz?

[@TrioLOLGamers]

Context: - 540Hz means that an image will stay on the screen for 0,00185s. - 240Hz means that an image will stay on the screen for 0,0041667s. (also when you have G-sync and Freesync enabled). So this is 2ms vs 4ms. But this is not a "delay". This also depend on your FPSs the ideal case is 540 fps on a 540fps monitor.

[@bozhidardimitrov3573]

Basically useless money spent

[@TrioLOLGamers]

@@bozhidardimitrov3573 theorically, if you does not have that high FPS number and gsync/Freesync are enabled, yes. With Gsync-freesync enabled, it is useful to have high refresh rate, but it is like "I need a fast car to use all my horse power to go at the best 100km/h" while there are other solutions for that case scenario. In real life, Gsync/Freesync add 3 to nothing milliseconds of delay... The question is "can you tell the difference"? That's a lot complicated and depend on if you're trained or not. Also, the real test should be a REAL BLIND test, not someone saying "it seems better to me". Linus tech tips did a test and yes, 240hz can help a pro pro gamer in real life tests. BUT, like he said, you need at least more than 300fps for this monitor... Also FPS is not everything in gaming sessions, because 1% low can be a huge pain, so... Better capped at 240fps with Gsync/freesync and a 240hz monitor than an unstable FPS could with a 540hz monitor.

[@yunus-emredoygun5236]

@@bozhidardimitrov3573 basically yes, you need 540+ fps stable on games

[@Just_a_Piano_]

@@yunus-emredoygun5236 me over here playing competitive PC games on a flatscreen Vizio tv just about 20 (ish) years old with 0 issues. I couldn't bare playing on a tiny ass screen like that

[@Shakermakerrr]

​@Just_a_Piano_ same here, play mine on a jvc amazon fire TV that set me back on a sale like, 100 bucks

[@braxinIV]

That “looking through a window and not a screen” feeling was achieved when I saw 144fps for the first time.

[@530Issa]

for me it was 240. 120 and 144 felt smooth but nothing like 240 to me

[@YNJib]

@@530Issaam I the only person on earth who barely notices the difference’s, people say o when I went from 75 to 165 it was like entering another realm or something and that they could never go back, meanwhile I just really don’t see much of a difference and could go back💀

[@JS1982-p5g]

@@YNJib There is a huge difference. Are you sure you changed your graphics settings both in game and on windows? Are you using DisplayPort?

[@doomguy974]

​@optivi make sure you've changed the display refresh rate in advanced display settings, it's nothing life changing but there should be a noticeable difference between 60 and 120

[@GodlyDra]

@@doomguy974 I cant even notice a difference between 30 and 60. Tbf its because my eyes are terrible but still.

[@TBStunt3r]

going from 60hrz to 180hrz last week was huge

[@Vanillaflavouredcheese]

I still use my $10 overclocked 75hz thriftshop monitors

[@remnant2484]

same

[@mczaga]

I have Second hand friend selling 60hz screen bugged screen.

[@user-ii5hx8xx8l]

​@@remnant2484 Date a Live fan, eh?

[@عبدالله_ملا]

شاشتي 75 هرتز، وهي ممتازة جدًا وسعرها كان 550 ريال سعودي

[@jeppe1774]

@@عبدالله_ملا What resolution? ما هي دقة الشاشة التي تمتلكها شاشتك؟

[@craft3316]

If anyone doesn’t know, your fps ties in with the hz. You’d have to be running 500+ fps to get that 500+ hz

[@CD-vb9fi]

it's not that simple... a 500+ Hz monitor can match up with your 120 fps BETTER than a 240 monitor can. This means that this superfast monitor will "catch" frames between frames that a 240 Hz cannot catch. Frames are not steady they go up and the go down... sometimes way up or way down. The faster the Monitor is the larger "range" it has for drawing an image without the problems that come from a monitor that 1/2 way through drawing a frame when it gets told to start drawing a new image. There are other benefits as well... such as allowing the monitor to do extra work in between frames to improve image here and there. To be honest, I would really like to see a monitor that does it's own AntiAliasing in post processing so that it can be of loaded from the graphics card. If you want the most advanced and realistic looking and responsive images... we should have processing at the CPU, GPU, and Monitor processing stages each handling the features that compliment it the most!

[@kiqo9128]

@@CD-vb9fi Actually, the lower your fps from your monitors refresh rate the more input lag you experience. Having a monitor that does 540hz but only getting between 100-200 is gonna result in major input lag. Only way around this is by having to cap the refresh rate between games and the average fps they get. But by doing this, you're never going to have a consistent experience since you'll always be changing refresh rate, depending on the amount of games you play.

[@CD-vb9fi]

@@kiqo9128 no... that is not input lag. "Input Lag" is specifically the time it takes for the system to "render image and transmit it" plus the time it takes for the monitor "to display said image". Your "input lag" as a human also includes your ability to mentally "process" what you are seeing on a screen and then respond so it. Additionally, how fast your keyboard and mouse can send your key presses and clicks account for some of that "input lag" as well. A person 'technically' can have greater input lag with 120 fps than someone playing at 30 fps. Now, with all of that said... there is still some truth to what you say, but only because the more frames being drawn allows for more opportunities to respond due to "more information" being available". But FPS is NOT directly correlated to Input Lag... they are entirely separate from each other and are two different computational concepts. There is "Lag", "Input Lag", and "FPS". Lag and FPS are relational as one can affect the other... but "Input Lag" is separate from "FPS". Lag can affect both "Input Lag" and "FPS" by virtue of it being involved with both because "lag" in general is caused by "processing lag" but it sits between "input and output".

[@Vortextual]

and i still cant get 60fps on 60hz

[@xephosbot]

​@@CD-vb9fiOh, we are waiting for monitors with a built-in GPU that will implement hardware anti-aliasing as well as active cooling, haha

[@Eyoree1]

this really benefits me when im playing online game at 0.1x speed

[@Dreamcatcher_Lvl_]

I have recently jumped from 75hz fhz to 180hz qhd, that's really makes sense

[@jhooo01]

I My PC And 75Hz my reaction: 🤡😧

[@warriorhc172]

Me rocking a Gtx 650, playing minecraft at 40 fps, and never able to fill in my 60Hz refresh rate 💀💀

[@darshil2317]

No way you're getting 40 fps in minecraft unless you're running some heavy shaders or your cpu is really bad

[@sakesaurus]

you don't need to play at the refresh rate for the refresh rate to matter. If your monitor was 30 hz you wouldn't be able to attack mobs with sword

[@Enderwafflez]

​@@darshil2317 I get less than 30 with vanilla and sometimes less than 15 with nothing 💀

[@darshil2317]

@@Enderwafflez Java has horrible optimization for older computers, but any mid-low computer can run it well, granted that you dont get generous with the render distance.I have an i5 3470 and gt 730 and I easily get 120+ fps

[@Enderwafflez]

@@darshil2317 I use around 6-8 render distance

[@CrocoDylianVT]

Meanwhile me being blown away from going from 60 to 75

[@mirresat3763]

Fr like i just got my new monitor . And ive been using my old 60 hz monitor for 1 and half years or more so but its feels good to have a 75 hz monitor now .

[@udpsocket]

Wait till you get to 90hz.

[@mirresat3763]

@@udpsocket sure in future definitely Have a nice day maye

[@mirresat3763]

@@udpsocket sure in future definitely Have a nice day mate

[@Bdot888]

I definitely notice the jump from 60-75hz!

[@andreamaral9725]

For everyone minus professional esports players I'd always recommend a better picture over extremely high refresh rate, beyond 180hz you're limited by your reaction time, you won't see an improvement to your game besides a smoother feel to it. Honestly high ppi and good contrast would be better than spending so much for high hz. I think the biggest thing to actually pay attention to is the latency, mouse and keyboard latency to be specific, if you get that to minimal numbers that's when you'll see and feel a bigger difference than 240-540hz.

[@djxd8935]

Me watching the video on 60hz screen:🗿

[@josh4497]

It's slowed down so you can see the difference on your 60hz (30fps) monitor

[@djxd8935]

@@josh4497 ik I'm just being sarcastic😂

[@natr1x9]

Yeah but if they play it normal speed you can't notice a big difference. All these videos saying look how different they are.

[@russianbear0027]

​@@josh4497 shouldn't 60hz be 60fps? Since the monitor is capable of displaying a new frame with every refresh, not every other.

[@DeadGhost307]

​@@russianbear0027the video is 30fps

[@durak4371]

Me who plays on stretch just to get 75hz: Ah yes what an interesting information

[@dogemoonelonbez-musk2540]

I dont understand. 60 fps is smooth gameplay. Everything more than that is only for the trained eye. You cant see more than 144 which is for experienced sniper... in real life. Its total bullshit. I play on 60hz.. has 10 years and still working

[@durak4371]

@@dogemoonelonbez-musk2540 try playing on atleast 75hz the difference is unbelievable i used to think like you too until i discovered the stretched resolution trick to get 75 hz

[@taylan7094]

​@@dogemoonelonbez-musk2540 Once you try 240hz, 60hz is all laggy and borderline unplayable. I can feel the difference between 144hz and 240hz even while moving the cursor on windows. You either never used anything other than 60hz or have severe brain damage.

[@2OsNot3]

​@@dogemoonelonbez-musk2540the switch from 60 to 144 is actually massive, i used to have tje same mindset as you

[@raseli-sp7oc]

@@dogemoonelonbez-musk2540 Everyone who never used a 144hz+ monitor thinks that. Trust me. It is a HUGE difference.

[@omegalongdong]

Me with 30 hz 720p monitor 🗿

[@cuebankrupt]

u can prob find a better monitor for like 10 bucks on fb market

[@ateenwholikesvideogames303]

Pfp and username checks out

[@pelaaja8097]

Bro that is so bad

[@caliginousmoira8565]

how? i have 720 75hz from 20 years ago..

[@NitroNightfall]

I recently got the Alienware 500hz AW2524H monitor and it's crazy smooth. But I didn't realize it didn't have built in speakers until I started using it 😂

[@ImAShrimpbruv]

That monitor alone worths more than my whole rig

[@kristofprogamer8746]

same

[@ericpadilla2454]

Dman, u must have a shit rig then

[@29-pratyushnair23]

fr

[@raeveira]

meanwhile me rocking on 60hz/75hz monitors

[@ilya_sochinskij]

I on 1440p 75hz....😅

[@sangamdua]

​@@ilya_sochinskij 1080p 165hz are better

[@AxtrodoSulfur]

75 is a dream for me

[@s9larbeam]

@@AxtrodoSulfur Get... a... job...

[@normified]

no, only if you're playing competetive fps games @@sangamdua

[@rileyclosbeats]

i literally never been in a situation where i needed more than 144hz

[@LemonHead-q6h]

You can't even tell the difference. 60-120hz feels smoother. 120+ is unnecessary. There's no need for it it's all just a gimmick past 120

[@ashtinpeaks9972]

​@@LemonHead-q6h Just people trying to sell shit for companies its sad. People yell out of the woodwork that you need it lmfao in the comments

[@Rororandd]

​@@LemonHead-q6honly if you don't play geometry dash. Even 144hz is considered low here

[@Retro--]

Ive literally never been in a situation where im getting above 120fps in a modern game

[@K-CHOMA]

​@@Retro-- In most cards on modern games 60 FPS is good balance between graphic and framerate.

[@Rarefied-Air]

"it feels like looking through a window instead of looking at a screen" I already feel that way about 120hz

[@Umneriko]

Crazy to think there was a time where 30fps was good enough

[@TakenBySS]

15-30 fps is still very very good

[@sxckooo]

@@TakenBySS60 fps is the minimum anything below is garbage

[@StevenMcSteve]

30 fps is still good enough, it's just most people nowadays were spoiled and didn't have to deal with 10fps while growing up

[@l3g10nw]

@@StevenMcSteve i used to play world of warcraft at 10-25fps. and i had much more fun than now that i can run it at 200+fps on highest settings. crazy xD

[@Trippsy05]

​@@StevenMcSteveI started by juicing every last nanometer out of a lenovo office PC, happy to get 30 - 60fps out of Source games at low resolution. 10 years later I have a 1440p 165hz rig and find 30fps is the bare minimum. I dont even tolerate 60 anymore unless I have to. Also, well before I got that PC I had an Xbox 360 way back in the day which was more like 10 - 30fps as I recall. I'm making the point that it has little to do with being spoiled.

[@-Flabbergasted-]

I remember buying my first 1440p 144hz GSync monitor when it launched a couple of years ago. I paid 1250$ for the demo! Now a 540hz at 1000$ is considered pricey 😭

[@PsyteK]

😅😅😅😅😅

[@ManOfcultureolo]

คุณล้ำยุคพี่ชาย คุณได้ใช้มันก่อนคนอื่น ในตอนนั้น 90% ยังอยู่ที่ 60 hz มันคุ้มค่า คุณซื้อเวลาด้วย เวลามีราคาแพงกว่าสิ่งใด 😊

[@trevorthabest161]

That's a scam nowadays 😭 lmao

[@YRO.]

you got scammed bro

[@-Flabbergasted-]

@@YRO. I think so brotha 😭😂!

[@DeadFieldofFlowers]

Me playing on the living room tv: hmm very interesting indeed

[@TheMTFBoi]

same

[@Haforen]

And here I am paly with have white screen which shows everything white even black people convert to white 😂 can you imagine

[@henrybatt5492]

TVs almost all do 120 hz now tho

[@railasvuo]

​@@henrybatt5492Mine doesn't

[@cherubin7th]

A lot if software messes frames up and movies have different frame rates, so a high frame rate would fix that.

[@Obi1kenobi10]

540? Jesus.... I just upgraded to 200 from 60. That change was nuts. I cant imagine 540.

[@coldblackice]

Honestly you likely wouldn't even notice it. And even if you did, there's a good chance it'd still be placebo

[@DaddyM7MD]

​@@coldblackicenope. Absolutely not. I can tell the difference between 120 and 165 so I can definitely tell the difference between 200 and 540

[@mahshshsrklingfa7031]

​@@coldblackice absolutely not..if you cant buy it( like me) go to a store where they have a free demo.. difference is crazy.. they even let me play valo on it and maybe the placebo was that it felt like enemies where moving slower and it was so easy to hit headshots lol😂

[@HopeforDespair]

Why would you get a 200hz over a 240 lol?

[@Obi1kenobi10]

@goatedconfirmed1337 the price. My monitor was on sale for under $100. A 240, the same size was almost twice the price. So.. I went with a 200hz. lol

[@ntexplorer]

me still using 60hz screen🗿

[@Wonsztojad]

Buy 143hz iyama for 70 dolarz

[@DaysDH]

same

[@jxshplaysgames5654]

sam

[@EclairTw]

damn you're broke

[@Tricon.2nd]

God damn. Here i am using a 60 hz monitor

[@RAYX07]

You think that's crazy ? Here I am using a 768p 30hz monitor from the Jurassic period 😂

[@alipathan495]

You lucky I have 20 hz 360p

[@alternatedenz]

@@RAYX07 What the fuck? That's not even 2008 range, thats 2003 office computer range

[@RAYX07]

@@alternatedenz I heard from my father that he permanently borrowed it from his office 😭

[@fardussarker8922]

Me with 45 hz monitor

[@anthonynorcal3616]

Im going from 60 to 240 on friday. I cant wait rofl. I usally at the top on my team on cod already cant wait to see what happens now

[@skaidritehohberga1240]

So what happend

[@NitroNightfall]

how is it now?

[@3AGamer]

Bro, I just got my 144hz screen and wow it's a dream I am living

[@rikkuroru]

Congrats

[@negur1419]

When someone gets a computer that holds consistent 540 fps on high graphics this will be actually worth it. (its possible aparently so the monitor is not pointless👍)

[@Tincoco_]

not even at high. Because a lot of players play all low or a mix. For comp at least

[@lexavlogs7149]

Yes the 4090 can manage to max out the graphics of some games like f23 csgo cod forza so racing and competitive games

[@Nb_2089]

@@Tincoco_ In comp most players play at 1080p lowest graphics, with all effects turned off

[@sebastianlaakso2729]

​@@Nb_2089This is s 1080p monitor, so that's already checked.

[@Purchata]

@@lexavlogs7149 fuck yeah, can't wait for future CSGO events

[@xDEADLOCKEDx2468]

Imagine owning something like this and still getting capped by players who are playing as low as 45fps.

[@Celatra]

This lol

[@skapunker1986]

I own triple 240Hz monitors, Did it make me a better gamer? hell no, i was bad before and im still bad now. only difference is that everything feels 4x smoother than before. and thats a worthwhile experienc e on its own. When i tell my friends about 240hz monitors i tell them this: Ignorance is Blissful, if you Don't know any better, your not missing it either. I used to be a sucker for graphics, everything ultra graphics, 4k resolution, FPS BE DAMNED. But now that i have experienced 240hz monitors, i have become the polar opposite, now i play All my games at he lowest possible settings, just to reach that smooth 240fps. which is pretty hard to reach unless the game is 7 to 8+ years old.

[@David_99778]

@@skapunker1986I mean if you have monitors like this why wouldn t you get a pc which can run games at atleast above average settings at that framerate

[@skapunker1986]

Im using an HEDT AMD Threadripper 3990x 64c 128t 3080 TI 128gb ram. I would say that it isnt the right time for consistently gaming at 240hz yet, let alone 540hz, unless Valorant is literaly the only game you ever play...

[@David_99778]

@@skapunker1986 Damn that s a crazy setup but still not on the level of running most modern games at 4k 240fps. But I think a 4090ti with a 7950x and bunch of quick rams will do it

[@mido_mayadoo]

And I am here still sticking with 60hz😂😂😂

[@panquemadol]

the window analogy actually goes hard

[@hodayfa000h]

Ah yes, competitive gaming, where your specs determine your skills

[@Sh4quille0atmeal]

you can gain an advantage with higher refresh rates due to having shorter delays between when stuff happens and when it actually gets shown on your screen. the biggest noticeable difference is jumping from 60 or 75hz to 120 or 144. but 540hz is just overkill. sure when you slow down the video like they did here, you can see the difference but in real-time you just cant, because the reaction times required to gain an advantage from it are not humanly possible. and even if you did somehow have such a reaction time, it wouldnt benefit you much

[@WilmanYepez]

​@@Sh4quille0atmeal due stop.....fps don't work like that

[@ShFred]

And your graphics look like complete ass to squeeze every single frame out.

[@ratboygirl]

@@WilmanYepez it genuinely does. like yes, your mechanical skills do matter a lot. but having a shit setup will hinder you

[@adriangomez6826]

@@Sh4quille0atmeal you're literally describing ping latency not monitor or gpu latency.

[@spartanrangermetro]

power consumption be crazy with this one

[@TPGKDUB]

Using the 540hz paired with a Nintendo stick drift controller is epic

[@countdoku1430]

ah yes let me look aat the different between a 540 hz and 240 hz video in a 60 fps video

[@radekfylcka9029]

Well, Its slowed down so it is actually accurate ...

[@proliloli2141]

@@radekfylcka9029 sadly your eyes in real life do not see things slowed down like this

[@bruno100carro]

@@proliloli2141 no need to, because i'll feel it, the slow mo it's only to demonstrate

[@Exknight2]

@@proliloli2141 Your eyes totally see the difference in normal speed, why do you think 240hz monitors went crazy after release and now a 540hz came out, people went for the 240hz cause there is massive difference compared to 60hz and an okay difference from 144hz if you are playing competitive fps games then you bound to know these things or have tried them with time.

[@BenDover-oc7vl]

All a load of shit money spin. Guarantee if you seen them side by side in real life the difference will be minimal. I’d take 1440p any day

[@alcatraz8694]

he bought a 1k monitor, now he only needs a 5k pc

[@guillermocasesiranzo2681]

We're finally able to compare motion blur between a crt monitor and a modern display. Nice

[@mikafoxx2717]

BFI tech makes that much cheaper, even a random 144hz display at like 120 with strobing will be like a CRT for motion clarity. Most CRT's wouldn't even be run as high as 120fps, usually half that but equally clear motion but a chopper picture that was harder on the eyes. Sample and hold takes like 1000fps to be totally equal to a CRT, more or less.

[@scotty28653]

I'll be interested when prices come back to earth. Hopefully high refresh rate monitors will all be the standard and they'll be more reasonably priced.

[@charlesfournier8095]

omg thank you for summarizing a 10 minute video for us

[@DaxAxeOffical]

Me, with 60fps at all times:

[@alamin225]

if you don't play serious online multiplayer games than its okay for you.

[@camaraman645]

Same bruh

[@markusbraunberger180]

I dont even get 60 fps

[@quenquen26]

I got 144hz, now i can't even use a 60Hz screen there's so much mire latency it's so bad

[@alexanderruchkov8440]

@@quenquen26 Dude, i got 120hz oled and work on a 60hz laptop. Suffering it is.

[@oofgaming1739]

Imagine this refresh rate in a vr headset.

[@scarecrow5848]

Not useful, 144 is the most you wanna go for, even then there's not a major difference between 90 and 144 tbh.

[@PD-ws4td]

@@scarecrow5848 What are you talking about? The higher the refresh-rate the better when it comes to VR devices. Not only does everything become smoother, but it reduces motion sickness and increases immersion.

[@scarecrow5848]

@@PD-ws4td no, not true. First of all no computers can run above 144 FPS anyway at the moment with the super high resolutions modern VR headsets are asking for, even a 4090 can't run a reverb g2 at 90 FPS full resolution. Second of all "more smoothness" isn't true, due to the reason I just listed. Third there's not even a difference from 90 and beyond until you get to like 244. Even if you were doing 244 it's not like tracking latency is noticable on below 60 FPS. Me: using a gtx1660 on the lowest resolution a G2 will let me use it at below 60 FPS. there's no tracking latency and it's controllers use IR lights for tracking.

[@MsHojat]

This is like the only application where such display would make sense to exist. However even then for the foreseeable future (like 20 years) it will be a choice between high refresh rate and good graphics. As-is people seem much happier with 90-144 Hz display with great, more immersive graphics than to deal with crappy "Horizon Worlds"/Wii-style graphics.

[@MsHojat]

@@scarecrow5848 they are not necessarily talking about the present, but the future. Also keep in mind that things like Asynchronous Space Warp, FidelityFX Super Resolution, Deep Learning Super Sampling, and more primitive (or alternate) interpolation techniques can all offer much smoother content to a display than the GPU outputs itself. With time and the available hardware it could be a major component in getting smooth VR. That being said, around 240 Hz displays are probably quite sufficient as well even for VR, but if anything was to use higher than 240 Hz it would be VR.

[@happydappyman]

Idk about this. The difference between 120 and 200 hz is already pretty small. Difference between 200 and 260 is hard to notice. Seriously doubt there's much benefit in going above 500

[@toespic]

overclock my 60hz monitor to 72hz (smoother with less shutter from fps capping) was a wise decision I made 3 years ago, then moving to 144hz im not looking back

[@FG-ql5ng]

is it worth going from 60hz to 144hz and if so what’s some cheap options?

[@toespic]

@@FG-ql5ng if you go full budget mode then I would recommend chinese monitor redmi, they offer absurd feature forits price. Model: redmi G24 is what I would recommend 100$ for 165hz and 1ms delay

[@AlexisGamer_200]

​@@FG-ql5ngit is, faster inputs

[@SpyDaFX]

i overclocked my 144hz monitor that was capped to 60hz, to 75hz, and it died a week later..

[@toespic]

@@SpyDaFX wtf mine monitor glitched away at first setting how urs working for a short time lol

[@PatoChu]

I remember when 240hz 1080p monitors costed around 800-1000 USD, now you can find these for 200 Cant wait for 540hz to be the new 144hz in 2030.

[@Lue1337]

Thinking the same, I want OLED 540-650 hz 4K-8K, that would be the max quality and speed most humans could take advantage of, maybe in a few years...

[@PatoChu]

@@Lue1337 oof yeah I don’t think those are gonna be available for a while lmao 😂 and even if they did, they’d actually cost you a kidney no exaggeration

[@RedMonkey-p1z]

Bro u could probably see the future with 540hz 😭😭

[@teknastyk]

was looking for this exact comment...

[@TheRedeyerecords]

It's probably like oldschool CRT monitors @120 with Quake II ....

[@MrBanana203]

Me chilling with a 60 hz moniter

[@lightdarklightdarklightdark]

man the movement looked smooth

[@dezxera6939]

After 120fps you start to get diminishing returns on the latency delay, however to say the smoother frames doesn't make a difference to the eye is hard to say. Definitely need a thorough test on that.

[@johanluvr]

The delay "increase" is so small its practically nonexistant though. Playing on 120 when your rig can run 240 is retarded as fuck.

[@aouyiu]

This is why stuff like ULMB2 exists, manufactured are always developing ways of further smoothing an image and addressing latency.

[@spadelcd]

no. even going from 120 - 144 is life changing. if ur really gonna sit here and say 120 vs 240 and over is "diminishing" your just uneducated

[@RaimaNd]

As an ex professional eSports player I can assure you that any hz and fps increase helps and you notice the slightest changes. People who don't play on a high level obviously aren't as sensitive to these things and don't realize the difference.

[@freezy2755]

@@spadelcdlmao not at all? I play games like cs on 60hz and i tried it on a 300hz monitor and apart from being able to react to enemies going round corners faster its really not that much better

[@Cosmic-Wanderer]

Still rocking a 55inch 60hz Samsung tele 😂

[@Paptis]

Geometry Dash demon slayers: SHUT UP AND TAKE MY MONEY

[@felixkremer7773]

I’ll keep using my 1440p 165hz monitors for awhile. Bought them 4 years ago during lockdown and they still hold up good. Upgraded from a at the time 3 year old 1080 60hz panel. That I now use in portrait for discord, school pdf’s or programming.

[@Hymn_]

school pedo?

[@mikafoxx2717]

You have to double the framerate to halve the motion blur, so something like 170 to 360 is only a decent upgrade, but also beyond 200hz, usually the LCD panel itself is the major limiting factor instead of the refresh rate. OLED solves this so there's no point going above 240 on an LCD, just use pulser backlight at high fps or a few down from maximum. If you see artifacts of double images at highest refresh rate, you know it's well limited by the panel speed. OLED doesn't have any of that. Use a lower HZ and higher vertical total custom resolution for same pixel clock to get maximum refresh speed at lower hz

[@patersul]

When 1000Hz comes out i might get the 240Hz on discount 😆

[@prozac1127]

It's so funny when you slow it down. That like selling a gpu that doesn't work but when you look into it using xray you see activity

[@IDonotHaveAGoodName]

Ah yes, because in most games where quick decisions are made in less than a second. The tiniest amount of blur, only seeable by slowing considerably the footage, is clearly useful 😆

[@D-365]

You know when you snap your mouse around and get that mess with or without motion blur? That's what I want to eliminate.

[@williamcadence]

Then turn off motion blur in the graphics settings 😂😂😂

[@D-365]

@OkScaleModels ?

[@Iseenoobpeoples]

It's not only seeable by slowing... they had to slow it because shorts are 30Hz and most people don't have 540Hz monitors. You might be too noob to notice it in real time but any competitive gamer can.

[@IDonotHaveAGoodName]

@@Iseenoobpeoples that's a fair point but what I mean is that if this device was actually useful you'd see it everywhere with pro players, yet you don't. It doesn't take a good amount of googling before you see people wondering if there is even a difference between 240 and 144 herz let alone 540. This video is nothing more than useless thought what upset me in the first place was jow much he praised it a gamechanging (which is why I wrote my comment in the first place).

[@BreejGD]

I got one for Christmas today (merry Christmas) and wow I saw a difference, sure I went from 60 to 540 but I instantly saw huge improvement. Very smooth and good. It is about 800-1000 bucks tho

[@prashantmishra9985]

60Hz to 540Hz? That's an insane jump. You would have noticed the difference even at 144Hz. Merry Christmas.

[@DaarthPingas]

@@prashantmishra9985 back in the day, i went from CSGO on 60hz with latency to an older, but faster 75hz 5:4 monitor and even that difference was astounding. 144/1ms is where ive been for a while. if 540hz is overkill, it's bound to nearly negate all ghosting and tearing on 200-300 fps, at least if the tech is there.

[@ethemefekaraaslan1640]

Yeah right? I jumped 60 from 165 Hz and it was amazing, I was saying to myself how did I play this Long with 60 Hz? I cant imagine 540 hz​@@prashantmishra9985

[@josepio4168]

Dayum, your father bill gates or smth??

[@Procxlite]

@@josepio4168given that they went from 60 hz, it’s likely this Christmas gift was a while in the making

[@Extreme-PCIe-Cable]

“Yes, mom, I need this for osu!”

[@prashantmishra9985]

Osu??

[@Extreme-PCIe-Cable]

@@prashantmishra9985 rhythm gayme where you click circles

[@irshad334]

Indeed, especially when playing at 69fps, I notice about 420% increase in my performance in overhub.

[@dezpotizmOFheaven]

Of course he says it's worth it, because the company pays him to say that. 😂

[@pill-poppingnarcissist]

I've used 60, 144, 240, and 270 refresh rate monitors. There is a difference, people love to claim you can't see past 140fps, but that's not true at all. 540hz is definitely going to look fantastic. You are ignorant.

[@dezpotizmOFheaven]

@@pill-poppingnarcissist I can't notice any difference past 60 fps. From 30 to 60 some games look smoother, even the anti-aliasing, but past this nothing changes.

[@marquerere]

@@dezpotizmOFheaven if your monitor is 60hz then obviously >60 fps won't make a difference

[@dezpotizmOFheaven]

@@marquerere It's 144 Hz 4K

[@marquerere]

​@@dezpotizmOFheaven is it set to 144hz on windows? I notice a huge difference even when just moving the mouse around

[@zaiderbaiter]

the new top 1s in GD bouta be insane

[@NaughtyBear1337]

pretty happy with the 300hz screen my laptop came with

[@NaughtyBear1337]

@@Odyssey636 Ok

[@smokyz_]

Ye, I got 240hz on my $3k laptop that I just use for browsing and game dev. I am pretty happy with it aswell.

[@mystic8187]

@@Odyssey636 a lot of them probably do yeah, however get a good high end one from like lenovo or asus, and they actually perform better than you'd think for the form factor. My asus strix plays anything intensive at 144hz at 1440p without thermal throttling hard, and the fan noise isn't noticeable at all with headphones.

[@kenshinhimura6280]

@@Odyssey636 Some people actually move their asses from their mom´s houses and want a good laptop to carry with them

[@cytro]

​@@Odyssey636why are you mad at someone using a gaming laptop, jfc, let people enjoy things You are the kind of people that give PC users a bad name

[@toasterman80]

I recently switched from a 60 Hz to a 180 Hz. Man, the difference is amazing

[@nallen.9434]

Wow. And you can see the difference only in slow motion. Amazing!

[@frenzied7942]

you don't understand anything about refresh rate or comp gaming if you think thays why it's slowed💀

[@nallen.9434]

@@frenzied7942 oh, so tell me about it if you think you are that smart as you claim, I'll wait 🙃

[@Ila_Aras]

​@@frenzied7942buddy? you gonna respond?

[@theblitz1687]

@@nallen.9434 well, the difference shows as smoothness of the image and ability to track objects better. Yes, you cant count individual frames in real life, but i personally experienced the smoothness shift from 144hz to 360hz. 360hz was much more enjoyable on fast paced fps. So i dont doubt people saying there is a difference between 240 to 540.

[@nallen.9434]

@@theblitz1687 I appreciate your answer and I can say you're right. Just think I've boosted my monitor refresh rate from 60Hz to 75Hz and that was more enjoyable. Yes, you can see / feel the difference between 144 / 165 / 240 / 280Hz. But much more? I think yes, a little bit. But think about what improvement will have your gameplay experience on 540Hz from 300Hz compared to 280Hz from 144Hz. I want to say that it's all about how big the difference will be (not in numbers) and I don't think it worth for the moment. It's too expensive for such a little difference, almost 0. Don't go over 300Hz for the moment, this is my opinion, only if you are an enthusiast.

[@dubradiolol]

considering the human eye can discern gamma rotation(white to black to white) up to 500hz, not surprising you can notice a difference.

[@okkoheinio5139]

or rather, you can no longer notice the difference between it and reality subconsciously? (What they said about feeling like you're looking through a window.)

[@brandonhoover2120]

You will absolutely notice to difference. It’s all placebo.

[@Iseenoobpeoples]

@@brandonhoover2120 60Hz to 144Hz is really easy to see and give you a huge advantage, it must be similar going from 144Hz to 540Hz.

[@brandonhoover2120]

@@Iseenoobpeoples Absolutely not. For starters, there’s this thing called law of diminishing returns. Secondly, being able to see an ever so slight difference when recorded, and played back slowed down as much as possible are so different it’s hard to believe I even have to type that.

[@Iseenoobpeoples]

@@brandonhoover2120 Do you agree that 60Hz to 144Hz is a big advantage? If not then I'm afraid you don't know what you are talking about. Of course they slowed the footage KZbin shorts are 30Hz and most people don't have 540hz, they have to slow it down to show the difference. Diminishing return is true but the gap is so big 144Hz to 540Hz that it must give a substantial advantage, I retract the huge advantage statement if going from 144Hz.

[@shogunguy]

Diminishing returns. Once you start going above 240 the increase in negligible.

[@dextuh_morgan69]

As someone who has had an 144hz and a 240hz monitor i can say that the difference between them was VERY small in many games. Only some shooter games you could see the difference.

[@StoffiePrductions]

and thats the point here, a normal user doesnt need mor than 144hz everything above is wasted money@@dextuh_morgan69

[@fuckERLa]

Never not funny to see people give negative opinions on screens past 144hz because they either can't afford it or are still low rank in the games they play after buying a 400hz monitor and blame the hardware so they sell it and downgrade 😂 used to be "uhhhh only 144hz is worth it🤓" but somehow people have moved goalposts to "240hz is entry level" when they used to shit on 240hz 😂

[@jakehalle3697]

The reason why jumping from 240 hz to 360 hz isn't that different is because 360 is only 120hz higher while 60 to 144 you can feel it heavily because it's more than half, so 240hz to 540hz you would feel it greatly also and get benefits

[@RemedieX]

​@@fuckERLa People didn't "shit" on 240hz, there were several good reasons why it was simply a bad investment, especially early into their introduction, they simply weren't worth the diminishing returns. It's also not "entry level," even in present day, and won't be for a very long time - you made that up. Look, I'll let ai educate you: 240Hz monitors were not necessarily worse than 144Hz monitors when they were first introduced, but they did have some drawbacks. For example, they were more expensive, they required more powerful hardware to run at high frame rates, they had limited availability and *compatibility,* and they had diminishing returns in terms of noticeable improvement over 144Hz. Over time, 240Hz monitors have become more affordable, more accessible, and more advanced, with better response times, lower input lag, and higher resolutions. However, they are still not essential for most gamers, as 144Hz monitors can provide a sufficient and satisfying gaming experience for most scenarios. 240Hz monitors are mainly aimed at competitive and professional gamers who want to gain a slight edge over their opponents and who can afford and maintain the necessary hardware. It's best to do some research or at least, bare minimum, ask AI a simple question before cementing the misinformation you'll spread online.