OpenAI launches new AI model GPT-4o

OpenAI, makers of ChatGPT, are out with a new AI model called GPT-4o. Supporters say the latest artificial intelligence language model will make ChatGPT smarter and easier to use. abc7ne.ws/3yceDKk
#ai #openai #chatgpt #technology #abc7news

[@Anthony-dj4nd]

I'm in love with GPT-4o😍

[@markmuller7962]

Same brother

[@user-rk9kb2sd9b]

@@markmuller7962 I'm not, we don't even have access to it.

[@user-yc7ws9jp9g]

I Can't imagine how good this will be for playing dungions and dragons solo! I'm already using chat gp 3 for solo play it's amazing and teaches you how to play if your not familiar

[@Jhill448]

Its so fun

[@polymathpark]

"but is she really human or something humans do She's like a lithium flower ready to bloom I smell lithium now..."

[@TheBlanco951]

i love ai but i do feel a little bit scared now

[@piday9633]

You’re joking, right?

[@bonnix1sts874]

@@piday9633ai can be dangerous

[@piday9633]

@@bonnix1sts874 You could at least give me some premises to back up your conclusion that “AI can be dangerous…”

[@dustyskunk2557]

sometine, somewhere decades ago....pause computers, we need our libraries to stay open...pause computers, our children needs to read newspapers....

[@Ninjacrow198]

When will the cool part be available? It says I have gpt4o now but I can’t get the version that was on the demo

[@Sirmrmeowmeow]

'over the next few weeks' so the openai version of coming soon, but fairly soon and not 6 months+. Prob within 1 month for most for the new voice stuff.

[@duncankhtang]

Are those protesters going to fall asleep 😂

[@stranger.granger]

Will they go to China and protest there too?

[@markmuller7962]

Ikr

[@moonrocked]

Exactly if America doesn’t create agi/asi then china sure as hell will and that would literally bad for all of us.

[@newsoul.9]

How can i download it on my android?

[@ToastyZach]

There is not an android app

[@woodyreally]

Creepy!!! Just creepy!

[@markmuller7962]

Doomers are actually hilarious, especially the ones with a tin foil hat

[@tonyh1345]

It’s gonna be fun when AGI is used as a tool to synthetically create new bioweapons with longer incubation periods, more transmissibility, and more lethality.

[@MysteryStew5977]

@@tonyh1345 my AGI will anticipate it and update my genes accordingly

[@ZenTheMC]

@@tonyh1345 Those claims of the bad actors making bad things is that it lacks holistic consistency. Why would it only be used by bad actors? There are far more good actors in the world, and if everyone has access to it, the good actors will use the same tech to counter the bad actors. Of course there will be risks, just like any new tech. The thing is though, the only way to get to a high tech sci fi world where we live in abundance and solve the mysteries of the universe, is to embrace tech. You're never going to get to Star Trek without AI and robotics, at least not before the heat death of the universe or the existence of humanity, if you don't accelerate using tech. Want to solve climate change? Use the tech. Want to cure cancer? Use the tech. Look up all of the big breakthroughs that AI is making in other sectors like protein folding, climate science, education, etc. Don't just focus on fictional cyberpunk existence narrative driven media, and look at real-world progress too, besides just deep fakes.

[@MysteryStew5977]

​@@ZenTheMC I think what's missing in your initial question "why would it only be used by bad actors?" is that it doesn't even really get to the point. It isn't that it would be used ONLY by bad actors. The point is bad actors can use destructive potential in a way that can't be matched with constructive potential by good actors. It takes a second to level a city, but years to rebuild it. Even with AI behind the wheel. That's just the science of bringing order to chaos. It always takes longer than bringing chaos to order, no matter how much you speed up the process.

[@ZenTheMC]

@@MysteryStew5977 defense is easier than offense from first principles, game theory, and energy efficiency. I think the good actors will be actively using the same tech, like cyber security, biological “upgrades”, etc. If not, they should be, since proactive measures will need to be taken for countering. Bad actors can absolutely do a lot of damage, but we should have security measures already in place to anticipate that damage. I know you mentioned the science of bringing order to chaos, and how the destruction would be faster and harder to counter with construction. I don’t know if that’s true in practice, because of the reasons I mentioned before about defense being easier than offense. For the most part, game theory for nations has also adhered to defense over offense when it comes to other nations with similar power, and the defenders usually win out long term from efficiency(energy, resources, etc). The only time offense is more optimal is if you’re much stronger and can completely annihilate the defenders, without letting it drag on. If both bad and good actors have the same tech, and the good actors are being proactive and anticipating bad actors, then there’s an equal level of power via the tech, but more good guys, so even more favorable. Can the bad guys level a city that might take longer to rebuild? Sure, but only if there is no defense. If there is defense with the same tech, by more people, the attack would not succeed.

[@HunterDriguez]

🤦‍♀️ those protesters. They think they can pause the tides.

[@Jhill448]

Fr

[@DAA314]

I can't help but take a minute to recognize the level of oblivious privilege that can be achieved in this wonderful country.

[@JihadPowell]

Pause ai lol

[@chaz_evans]

These protestors dont understand current AI

[@gerdaleta]

😮 pause AI😮 so what the Chinese can finish their Terminator robot army before us hell no😮 full speed ahead😮 the hell with morality ethics any of that s*** we'll figure that out when we get to super intelligence😮 or will die😮 nothing ventured nothing gained😮

[@moonrocked]

Exactly I rather us have agi/asi then freaking china.

[@Jhill448]

😂😂😂😂😂 love this

[@Woodardray]

It is awesome. But I wonder how it will mitigate dealing with people who have mental health issues? There’s a possibility that people will become emotionally attached to this tech .

[@Wacharis]

It’ll be a personal little therapist for many. But yeah, the movie Her is coming to fruition. In the future, Bladerunner

[@KBRoller]

"We're not against AI tech, we just want them to stop making it until they prove the tech they haven't made is safe first." Um... how? Name a single other industry where you can somehow do safety testing *before* you've made the product first? Drug safety trials can only occur *after* the drug is made; care safety tests can only occur *after* the car is built; and AI alignment tests can only fully be done *after* the model is trained. OpenAI, the company you're protesting outside of, have dedicated teams of alignment researchers who are, in fact, researching ways to try and mitigate harms AI may present. But the true and full safety testing can't be done without making the new models first. You can't pause creation and then test the creations you haven't made yet.

[@ADAWorld-ri8nc]

Ilya just left asking with many of the alignment safety team members. We are talking about potential extinction here.

[@DA-cl4ww]

@@ADAWorld-ri8nc "We are talking about potential extinction here." Its a fancy text autocomplete.

[@ADAWorld-ri8nc]

@@DA-cl4ww yes, they still are. But the plan is to have them be much more, autonomous computers able to complete complex tasks from end to end. The immediate danger isn’t the rebellious ai that you’re imagining. If the human who sets a powerful ai against his adversary and accidentally destroys humanity or drastically alters our world. That’s the imminent danger.

[@KBRoller]

@@ADAWorld-ri8nc "We're talking about potential extinction here." No, we're not; you watch too many sci-fi movies. We're talking about, at worst, an AI that helps people do terrible things that they'd already be trying to do. Besides, they're not stopping alignment research. Many of the current team quit, but they will be replaced and the alignment research will continue. This is not a situation of "now there's no one stopping the murder bots from murdering everyone!" This is just "now these particular people will no longer be the ones guiding the bots away from doing questionable things".

[@bluerfoot]

Who the hell are the protesters, man do people need to get a life.

[@andyhight9441]

Those protesters are not very effective. They should ask chatgpt how they can improve their protests.

[@thelasthallow]

lol its only free for the "chat" version. the version that can talk to you and do all the cool shit shown in this video is $60 a year

[@Wacharis]

That’s worth it. It can be your therapist and one session of therapy costs wayyyyy more than what’d you pay for GPT

[@paradoxfe6370]

$60 a year is good bro 😭

[@dangus69420]

@@Wacharis Using it as a therapist is easily one of the worst ideas i've ever read lol

[@thelasthallow]

@@paradoxfe6370 depends, i dont have any reason to use it but i did want to mess around with it. i cant justify paying any money when i just want to screw around with it.

[@Jhill448]

Its actually pretty dope when u get into what can actually do for you

[@landfillbear]

We want AI!, we want AI!, we want AI!

[@SirXtC]

those protesters watch way too many movies xD

[@Wacharis]

I know at least 30% of men are just waiting for a humanoid AI robot to date. The dating market is too rough for many men.

[@majikmuzik8036]

No thanks. Hard pass. Microsoft. Gates. Hard pass.

[@EdZachary1]

Trump 2024

[@tagacale1733]

You must love losing 😅

[@teebone2157]

You have to get rid of those political brain worms and free yourself from the slavery

[@ThisUsernameSystemF-ckingSucks]

Everyone in countries other than America is simply laughing at how foolish you guys are with choosing ancient decrepit fools as leaders. Sort your third world country out.

[@explosives101]

Trump is a Vaxxer.

[@Ghostintheeshell]

Seems like trump is a virus that shows up everywhere. Can't wait until he dissapears.