Lex Fridman Podcast full episode: kzbin.info/www/bejne/pXfJh6dpiJpkipY Thank you for listening ❤ Check out our sponsors: lexfridman.com/sponsors/cv8069-sa See below for guest bio, links, and to give feedback, submit questions, contact Lex, etc. *GUEST BIO:* Aman Sanger, Arvid Lunnemark, Michael Truell, and Sualeh Asif are creators of Cursor, a popular code editor that specializes in AI-assisted programming. *CONTACT LEX:* *Feedback* - give feedback to Lex: lexfridman.com/survey *AMA* - submit questions, videos or call-in: lexfridman.com/ama *Hiring* - join our team: lexfridman.com/hiring *Other* - other ways to get in touch: lexfridman.com/contact *EPISODE LINKS:* Cursor Website: cursor.com Cursor on X: x.com/cursor_ai Anysphere Website: anysphere.inc/ Aman's X: x.com/amanrsanger Aman's Website: amansanger.com/ Arvid's X: x.com/ArVID220u Arvid's Website: arvid.xyz/ Michael's Website: mntruell.com/ Michael's LinkedIn: bit.ly/3zIDkPN Sualeh's X: x.com/sualehasif996 Sualeh's Website: sualehasif.me/ *SPONSORS:* To support this podcast, check out our sponsors & get discounts: *Encord:* AI tooling for annotation & data management. Go to lexfridman.com/s/encord-cv8069-sa *MasterClass:* Online classes from world-class experts. Go to lexfridman.com/s/masterclass-cv8069-sa *Shopify:* Sell stuff online. Go to lexfridman.com/s/shopify-cv8069-sa *NetSuite:* Business management software. Go to lexfridman.com/s/netsuite-cv8069-sa *AG1:* All-in-one daily nutrition drinks. Go to lexfridman.com/s/ag1-cv8069-sa *PODCAST LINKS:* - Podcast Website: lexfridman.com/podcast - Apple Podcasts: apple.co/2lwqZIr - Spotify: spoti.fi/2nEwCF8 - RSS: lexfridman.com/feed/podcast/ - Podcast Playlist: kzbin.info/aero/PLrAXtmErZgOdP_8GztsuKi9nrraNbKKp4 - Clips Channel: kzbin.info *SOCIAL LINKS:* - X: x.com/lexfridman - Instagram: instagram.com/lexfridman - TikTok: tiktok.com/@lexfridman - LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/lexfridman - Facebook: facebook.com/lexfridman - Patreon: patreon.com/lexfridman - Telegram: t.me/lexfridman - Reddit: reddit.com/r/lexfridman
@Hydde873 ай бұрын
The way they're positioned next to each other, the strict look on Lex's face as he's meticulously taking notes. The young man looking nervously down at what's being written as he's explaining. Without context you'd think they're having an oral exam rather than an interview on LLM's.
@Codemanlex3 ай бұрын
I can’t un see it 😂
3 ай бұрын
You can see this mode of Lex in many of his interviews. Many guests went through academia and it's working whether they want it or not.
@TomaszOdkrywca3 ай бұрын
Nice of the lads to pop in and help Lex with his homework
I noticed they all kinda talked abit like altman. They are funded by OAI and probably revere the guy.
@FamilyYoutubeTV-x6d3 ай бұрын
This is utterly pathetic. Who pays attention to that? Focus on the content. Squirrel.
@jimmorrison26573 ай бұрын
Every sentence: Starts more or less normal, and then descends into creak central. Why do people do this shit?
@JBPVFLАй бұрын
A bit of an older comment, but I'd assume most of these people on here are not professional speakers? I think the vast majority of people on a podcast would have obvious weird ticks
@blazquez19873 ай бұрын
Vocal fry is over 9000
@nephastgweiz10223 ай бұрын
So annoying. These guys are trying to speak lower than their natural pitch to project status and authority, but it has the opposite effect.
@maxmouche3 ай бұрын
So friggin annoying
@punyan7753 ай бұрын
Sam Altman better stop talking like that too. It makes it hard to listen to him speak
@daveinpublic3 ай бұрын
@@punyan775it’s super annoying
@OMGitsjustperfect3 ай бұрын
@@nephastgweiz1022 Maybe they are just nervous and this is a subconscious thing. They are probably not doing it on purpose.
@lawrence92393 ай бұрын
Welcome aboard the Fry Airlines, where the voice is crispy, and the pitch is low!
@omarpuig13 ай бұрын
Holy shit the vocal fry in the video is crazy. Tell them to make an AI feature that can correct that. Holy shit it was hard to listen to.
@kevinmc11113 ай бұрын
Tell them to see a speech therapist. It's just a bad habit.
@trash_the_place3 ай бұрын
This is the way AI professionals communicate. It's a learned behavior from their leader, Sam Altman.
@kevinmc11113 ай бұрын
@@trash_the_place Unfortunate. Half the comments are complaining about it.
@patrickolsen4732 ай бұрын
It’s the WORST! I’ve shut down videos and podcasts bc of this
@jimmorrison26573 ай бұрын
I would ban all fry lords from my show 👍
@ReallyJustAnotherDay3 ай бұрын
Dudes just sitting round a table purring at each other like my cat
@gregoryrice32183 ай бұрын
Come fry with me, let's fry, let's fry away.
@fiarusgaming34203 ай бұрын
Fr what's with this vocal fry.
@tan_ori3 ай бұрын
Today I learned vocal fry is intentional. wtf, why?
@Jack-2day3 ай бұрын
Clint Eastwood effect 🤠
@peterwilliams10743 ай бұрын
@@Jack-2day That is an insult to Clint Eastwood. Vocal Fry is about trying to sound distinct and intelligent. Like a wealthy, pretentious accent out of a movie but fails miserably. My co-worker has a heavy vocal fry he uses in our department meetings but talks completely different and normal when chatting with his friends and wife.
@WeylandLabs3 ай бұрын
They were nervous - and their comfort zone is highly intellectual discussions. Understand they function/think/act different from regular people in society, not saying they are special. Its the way they were socially engineered at MIT thus trained to try to always keep advancing and progressing. Its a culture of high functioning intellects constantly challenging your views and perspectives in thinking the same. They all sound the same because they are the same.... and being the same hinders more than it innovates.
@eatfrenchtoast3 ай бұрын
Everybody's a critic. 👍
@gasparm.27113 ай бұрын
You sound like someone who thinks they are smart.
@mephiles64323 ай бұрын
Hopefully AI doesn't learn vocal fry too.
@DorianRodring3 ай бұрын
They put it in the figure 01 robot that uses gpt as its brain, so they already have
@bestpoker3 ай бұрын
Nice content. But can anyone explain the frogger voice phenomena? Each person has there own version. What happened?
@MrErick11603 ай бұрын
There is a paper showing vocal fry is actually a vocal problem
@user-pt1kj5uw3b3 ай бұрын
Silicon Valley
@rasi_rawss3 ай бұрын
it's the Cali dialect, there's some vids on it. The great california vowel shift is neat.
@gavinknight85603 ай бұрын
Who are these guys? How are they actually elevated to this point and funded. To be honest, they really don’t sound that bright to me, they do sound a lot like SV nepo babies with so little life experience or actual responsibility they just have no idea that their product is both obvious and, well, not really that good. They forked VS, built a loop to feed context for each query and connected it to multiple models. Thousands of experienced programmers did this for themselves over the last couple of years. Their ideas about OpenAI enshittifying Ai are valid but in the end, they are baking prompt engineering into an IDE.
@standinginthecrowd52203 ай бұрын
Why do all these AI guys have severe fry talk voices?
@MrWizardGG3 ай бұрын
You got nothing else to talk about?
@zasta73 ай бұрын
@@MrWizardGG they got no other vocal style to use??!!
@MrWizardGG3 ай бұрын
@@zasta7 bot
@zasta73 ай бұрын
@@MrWizardGG lol this is the first time anyone has called me a bot on the internet.
@animus3553 ай бұрын
People begin to take unconscious speech patterns enforced by their environment, this is one of those i think, especially young people.
@g0at33 ай бұрын
It's required to have vocal fry to work with openai
@blengi3 ай бұрын
how modular are LLMs? Are they typically just one ginormous network of weights or are some models partitioned into 100s of smaller sub networks like the brain and controlled by say executive input output networks which can intelligently route token context fragments to locaise compute resources to appropriate LLM sub networks?
@AlexanderMoen3 ай бұрын
it's essentially one ginormous model. However, agents are seen as the next step, and these are essentially mini AIs that are good at one very narrow thing and can take some specific set of actions. So, the idea is to set up a larger AI that can accurately determine when to use all the 100s or 1000s of mini AIs. Now, the hope is that OpenAI's 01 model is capable of doing that, so that you can now build a network that can autonomously do a ton of things in the virtual world
@lolmaker3 ай бұрын
Technically that’s the point of the weights
@Grahfx3 ай бұрын
I'm gonna train a model to de-fry voices in real-time.
@seb_gibbs3 ай бұрын
How to know when a query needs that extra compute? Just let GPT decide, thats what I did in the API I created, it works quite well.
@theguythatiam3 ай бұрын
Wow, just learning that vocal fry is a thing.
@WallaceRoseVincent3 ай бұрын
Voice fry o1.
@kipling19573 ай бұрын
Mr vocal fry.
@mikebrace8953 ай бұрын
I came here to comment on the vocal fry and was both happy that I wasn't the only one to notice it and also sad that I wasn't the only one to notice it 😁😁
@klue85783 ай бұрын
Lex’s facial expressions are enough.
@MyChannel-vm6dw3 ай бұрын
@2:51 why is Ed Shereen there?
@sanesanyo3 ай бұрын
Why all these dudes have a vocal fry? I can imagine one having it due to medical issues but all of them having a vocal fry. This has to be an imitation of Sam Altman.
@konstantinlozev22723 ай бұрын
Well, we have ways to make practically separate "expert" models choose which one of the "expert" models in a Mixture of Experts model (e.g. Mixtral). So, choosing a different scale model won't be too different than that.
@corneliusong34813 ай бұрын
My thoughts on the vocal fry - I'm an engineer who also talks with vocal fry, unknowingly, until I recently found out what it was. Now that I'm aware of it, I'm trying to not talk like that ha. I think the vocal fry here is probably unintentional and is a product of the work environment since I know many who talk like this as well.
@DanBarbatti3 ай бұрын
I believe I saw somewhere that this chain of thought reasoning worked better with an "unconstrained model" not showing this allows the model to go down roads that would be allowed by the "correctness/safety" training. Then the final answer/summation is passed through the safety "filter"
@quyiter3 ай бұрын
Only thing that sucks is you only get 25 messages per week with o1. Still have to use 4o for most things because I run out of messages and you can't increase the o1 message limit.
@Dionysus-Reality3 ай бұрын
o1 is 50 messages per week and o1 mini is 50 per day.
@georgemontgomery18923 ай бұрын
They Updated the usage a week or so ago.
@SogMosee3 ай бұрын
Use the api
@georgemontgomery18923 ай бұрын
@@SogMosee I am not positive on this but, I think you have to be a certain tier to use the API. However, even if you aren't a high enough tier, you can use OpenRouter API. More expensive, but you still have access to all models.
@Dionysus-Reality3 ай бұрын
@@SogMosee Dude the ApI is cooked, its so darn expensive especially if you want it to max out on thinking tokens.
@antient_atlas3 ай бұрын
Zero information gained, unfortunately. This guy is 100 % noise, 0 % signal
@neonvoid3 ай бұрын
:D
@dreamthread3 ай бұрын
this is the result of learning by rote in the traditional education system
@iWubBass3 ай бұрын
If you gained zero information then you just don't understand what he is saying lol
@iamzuckerburger3 ай бұрын
Jaja
@iraniansuperhacker43823 ай бұрын
This is how the whole field of ai has been since the 60s/70s after they realized its likely not possible for a digital computer to become a thinking being.
@C.L.A.S3 ай бұрын
This has been such a great episode, a young team creating paths for the future. Always intriguing when you talk voice, your opinion on technology/AI development. Much love to you Lex 🤍
@MrErick11603 ай бұрын
Vocal fry is proven to be a vocalization condition, they should have gone to a specialist as soon as there were indications of vocal frying, its actually related to problems in breathing as well.
@jimmorrison26573 ай бұрын
Nah, they put it on mate. This bloke starts most of his sentences more or less normally, but then slides into fry at the end. I don't why anyone would do this, but they do it on purpose.
@MrErick11603 ай бұрын
@@jimmorrison2657 of course because it's a trend, every tech bro in Cali and Silicon Valley uses the fry. But they do not realize this makes actual health issues. That's the price of being stupid unfortunately
@Leto2ndAtreides3 ай бұрын
Another possible reason for wanting to hide the chain of thought is that RL enhanced chain of thought might no longer be in a form that is easy for humans to grasp. So, may as well not show it.
@ianross69713 ай бұрын
They all sound the same, learnt from Sam
@QuantumLayer3 ай бұрын
Why is everyone trying to talk with the same voice as sam altman now
@vikasreddy70153 ай бұрын
before that step, we want our model to be self aware, about how the weights of each model react to a prompt, so openai first trained a base gpt40 model on the weights and outputs oif gpt2,gpt3 and even gpt4.. all the data available open source, except the gpt 4 one.. after this step is done and the weights have successfully learned meta awareness, now we have to teach the model to when to select what weights, for that use some basic search optimisation and further train it on output reward model, thats how its done..
@Kylbigel3 ай бұрын
They ran out of reasoning tokens.
@rippingbag3 ай бұрын
Wish the LLM had a way to have fixed presets that it would always reference before running its query. I’m using 4o to write short stories and some of the basic facts of the story like character names slosh around frequently. I imagine this would help in many use cases.
@YungGokuOver3 ай бұрын
Can you elaborate on your use with short stories and what not? I'm curious.
@rippingbag3 ай бұрын
@@YungGokuOverSure. So when writing a story I will establish some key characters that I want in the scene and I’ll outline some of the key motivations and emotions they are dealing with. I will also outline some of the tech involved in the story. I then proceed to outline the dialogue and 4o will then develop all of this into the overall scene I’m writing. Generally this works pretty well and the output is pretty good. But as we go a few scenes in some of that framework gets lost or 4o will get confused. It often guesses at full names the motivations tend to blur for the characters and it will often try to rework in themes and dialogue developed previously. I’ve had this happen hundreds of times at this point. If these are a way to establish fixed landmarks for the story and have 4o check with them before developing its response I think the output would be significantly better. It’s still an enormous time saver, but with this I would save a significantly greater amount of time. As it is now, I get the output, pull it down into the chat window, clean up the issues and resubmit. Additional having the ability to define an output would also be helpful. For example I will often have 4o developer a full character profile and description. I think save these to paste into a new chat once the one I am in is getting full. I’ve done this hundreds of time and what 4o defines as a profile and description changes every time I ask for this. I should be able to say here’s my profile and description form and just have 4o fill in the blanks.
@GateOfSteins3 ай бұрын
@@rippingbagYou could probably code that system yourself using the API.
@lancerben45513 ай бұрын
The problem with that is the context window, 128 000 tokens ain't that much. You run out quick. Also LLMs in general are pretty forgetful... I mean very forgetful to the point that they are not very useful for many task. I'm working on systems to improve them and I've succeeded in improving them greatly. But I still deal with the same issue just that it is reduced. I have not found a way to get reliable responses and the LLMs not forgetting or summarizing some context. In a long story i definitely see big problems especially as the story gets longer. You could ask the modem to summarize ll the key facts and feed that for the next part you want to write.. But... It will likely forget to summarize key parts.. You have to read the whole thing yourself to see if it missed anything or send it again and again and ask it to rate it's own summarization. But if you do that too much it gets confused and may hallucinate some things that were never in the story to begin with. The best model I found for long context is Claude. Gpt4o second... o1 the new model is more forgetful but reasons better than most so it has some uses for complex problems.
@rippingbag3 ай бұрын
@@lancerben4551 That’s what I’m seeing. Both 4o and 01 are extremely powerful and chats within “sight” of each other in a conversation can exhibit absolute brilliance, but the further you go that insight begins to wane and it becomes very apparent that it is not keeping up with all of the concepts you’re working with. If this happening with something as relatively simplistic as story writing, I have to imagine it’s far worse in something like programming. We really need a way to establish a framework that the conversation refers to when generating its response or expand the amount of information it can keep “in mind” for this to really be useful.
@JoshSci3 ай бұрын
Today i learned about vocal fry and I hate it
@bradwilson66013 ай бұрын
I did not understand a lot of the jargon. For an organism, Thought is just for decisions, is there a negative or punishment loop for AI? Certainly a big part for us.
@alexvisan76223 ай бұрын
Small or no reward = punishment
@fiarusgaming34203 ай бұрын
They're called loss functions, and yes they have them.
@mosaicmind883 ай бұрын
Sit down for a 2 hour interview with AI, and let's see how it goes.
@aga51093 ай бұрын
Thank you, guys for explaining.
@KayNg-o9n3 ай бұрын
The critical question you need to ask the AI "experts" is how close AI is in achieving or if it already surpassed escape velocity. Where escape velocity is defined by AI learning new skills faster than humans being capable of learning new skills (i.e. upskilling). Public awareness on the rate of capability increase of AI is severely under-reported providing little time for any potential future disaster mitigation.
@markojojic31863 ай бұрын
well the answer is pretty clear, it’s at 0 lol, LLM is only capable of predicting the next word, it does not “learn new skills faster than humans” at all and is quite far from it. We’d need to get hundreds of thousands of tokens if not millions in order to train the LLM on any skill (which implies we have learned the skill first)
@KayNg-o9n3 ай бұрын
@@markojojic3186 Thank you for the reply. Perhaps my question is not clear. My question is for the progression of AI, not specifically LLM's and especially not a single specific LLM. LLM's are but only 1 subclass of AI. Let's list some examples. AlexNet (2012), humans age (5-7): achieved superhuman performance for image classification. ChatGPT (2020), humans age (5-10): demonstrated advanced conversational & comprehension abilities across a range of topics. Strawberry/o1 (2024), humans age (18+): demonstrated advanced reasoning abilities. So skills that took humans approximately 11 years to develop, it took AI approximately 12 years to develop. In other words, we are currently dangerously close to or already past singularity. This is my perspective. I would like the perspective of real AI "experts".
@frisoboot70663 ай бұрын
There is a glitch if you type e-mail then it gives emails from user.
@meanmachine999993 ай бұрын
The black box is a black rock and we’ve peered deep enough to find something that can look back
@eto385814 күн бұрын
Lex doing the god's work. Thank you for revealing the people involved in these job replacing technologies. We will take care of the rest
@RuneX_ai3 ай бұрын
Did you guys see what notebook LM is capable of? I was blown away today? It have visual logic insights knowledge (I think) Anyway, great work Lex. Love your work. When do you open Lex University?
@antonioguiotto5293 ай бұрын
why does he speak like sam altman what s this new way of speaking
@kevinmc11113 ай бұрын
What's with all the vocal fry? So hard to hear anything they are saying because the fry is so distracting. Such a bad habit.
@tracy4193 ай бұрын
It's all in your head. The problem is you 🤷
@edh22463 ай бұрын
Trying to emulate Sam Altman.
@rubening3 ай бұрын
Agreed. I’ve had to stop listening to certain podcasts due to horrible vocal fry. Not gonna name individuals but rip Game informer podcast I’m looking at you.
@ILikeADoDaChaCha73 ай бұрын
It’s the only way for men with high voices to have some semblance of a deep voice, give em a break
@rubening3 ай бұрын
@@ILikeADoDaChaCha7 the frymen should give our ears a break
@dunar10053 ай бұрын
6:58 I disagree here and I think I know the real reason, it is because they have governing agents that check for content that violates policy. If they would output, the raw chain of thought, it would need to run through one of those agents first, which will deteriorate its quality.
@andynonomous85583 ай бұрын
It's hard to believe some of these guys when they talk about the capabilities. Sam Altman keeps saying the Turing test has been passed and that's not even close to true.
@vac593 ай бұрын
The Nobel Prize winner, for AI modeling, said that we are creating creatures that we will not be able to control.
@djmallinson3 ай бұрын
The vocal fry is off the charts; once you hear it, you can't ignore it, and I am not sure who it's supposed to impress. Please don't, it ruins listening to the otherwise interesting content.
@daveinpublic3 ай бұрын
Cursor, the original prompt engineers
@thyagofurtado3 ай бұрын
Cursor is nothing too special, except for having a intuitive interface. We can have a better product by creating agents with Griptape on ComfyUI and plugging o-1 with sonnet, and saving $ with a local Llama for small tasks... If you combine your flow with Zapier as well you can make some very powerful "machines"... But it goes to show the power of proper design. Claude's "Artifacts" section and WebSim are doing something similar.
@peterwilliams10743 ай бұрын
How many employees at OpenAI speak with vocal fry. Sam does and perhaps it has spread like a disease. It is so painful to listen to. Just speak with your normal voice, Please! One of the worst, meaningless interviews yet. I suppose the largest glaring fact is, there is lots of speculation and we don’t know answers.
@arisarden3 ай бұрын
Interesting… just like Elizabeth Holmes…. some of these guys are the next Theranos-like founder.
@DirtyLifeLove3 ай бұрын
Isn’t what the AI companies have in private or government entity much further advanced then what they would release to public or are they really releasing the latest tech to everyone?
@toddmenahem35173 ай бұрын
What’s with the vocal fry with these AI dudes. My gawd.
@TheFreddieFoo3 ай бұрын
All of them end their sentences with a vocal fry?? lol, definitely not buying a cursor subscription, these guys are fake af.
@deladonics3 ай бұрын
I can barely tell the difference in 4 and the o1 chain of thought. It probably sucks to be working on this stuff now where normies can't even tell the difference and also don't really care that much. The more interesting things happening now for me are what Meta is doing giving everyone the ability to use a good enough model to integrate into our own systems
@holdingW03 ай бұрын
I think both open and closed models are interesting. If future closed models are better than open models, i’ll still probably use both. This tech is just too cool and useful to not.
@deladonics3 ай бұрын
@@holdingW0 I definitely use the closed models. They are amazing, but I can't tell in what ways the models themselves could be much better. They could be more useful, but they would need something like a contextual awareness of where they are running and what tools are available to them. Maybe they might need agency of some kind too, but none of that is model related
@holdingW03 ай бұрын
@@deladonics they can definitely get better. For example at coding. If you use imagination, there's a universe of room for improvement at coding alone
@deladonics3 ай бұрын
@@holdingW0 I can see what's wrong with the code they output, but I can't imagine how they get better at it. I have worked a lot with GPT and Claude on coding, but I have to come up with the direction and the synthesis of ideas. They are great for boilerplate and even examples of using libraries or illustration of coding techniques, but if you ask them to combine these individual pieces, it breaks down. It just seems like something outside is missing as opposed to what these people are talking about
@MrWizardGG3 ай бұрын
Have you tried using the o1 with a CLI based coding assistant? If not please don't share what you think.
@johnmartin6503 ай бұрын
They do it because they are all sheep imitating eachother.
@JohnEnergy20123 ай бұрын
Crackling voice dude... unbearable.
@MissMyMusicAddiction3 ай бұрын
o1 is better. it's more thorough, better than 4, but it's still spotty.
@jmgriffin23 ай бұрын
Lex is the only guy that has the IQ to pull this podcast off. I can't wait to listen to the whole thing. I feel fucking dumb just saying that. Lol
@renjithravindran50183 ай бұрын
There is pre-training and post-training.. but not training!! In my opinion the word pre-training has been abused. We can use a pre-trained model.. but we can't call the process of building a pre-trained model as pre-training.. it's just training!
@quonxinquonyi85703 ай бұрын
Pre training is self supervised learning while fine tuning is supervised learning…so pre training exists between realm of unsupervised and completely supervised learning
@emi_again3 ай бұрын
this guy could be announcing that cured cancer and I'd still cringe at his voice
@gnomedster3 ай бұрын
That voice was irritating as hell. Why do people think it's cool to talk like that?
@jimmorrison26573 ай бұрын
Because it IS cool. Just because you don't like it doesn't mean it's bad. Only joking. It's fucking seriously annoying ✌
@Josh.Pascale3 ай бұрын
I have to be honest, this sounds like the manifesto of a nihilist
@RENCHER3 ай бұрын
🐸 🐸 🐸 🐸 🐸
@MTBryanH3 ай бұрын
AI being trained by smart kids that most likely have never had a job, never had a date, never missed a meal, probably never paid income tax, property tax. Scary! But now some of the AI answers from Google, etc, make more sense.
@arisarden3 ай бұрын
More vocal fry… ermmm… or cow bell!
@briandouglas73753 ай бұрын
I have been using it alot. It's OK. It still has many of the flaws of it's predecessor. What is interesting about it is watching it's process. I have been working with it on coding and it still misses so much logic, or rewrites the code every time.
@taWay213 ай бұрын
Lol im just going to pretend I know what they're talking about.
@JRS20253 ай бұрын
Why are you here
@Z3r0XoL3 ай бұрын
@@JRS2025 to learn something
@CognoscereSystem3 ай бұрын
Our Channel has a story to tell on this subject. Most of you won't believe it.
@LorenzoAgenlli3 ай бұрын
When someone starts insulting the chat in every language, then he needs more intelligence.
@davab3 ай бұрын
I have neber seen lex so not engaged haha
@stirfrywok29273 ай бұрын
It looks like he has a phone on his lap. Playing Candy Crush or texting Huberman. "Stuck with a bunch of nerds, rescue me"
@darshan7771patil3 ай бұрын
Tbh he looks annoyed
@carlosmariomejia3 ай бұрын
I always thought the fake raspy voice was only for annoying girls until I heard this guy. I only watched like a minute of the video and had to switch to something else.
@Naindurth3 ай бұрын
hahaha same! I came to the comments to see if I was the only one.. changing video now, 1 minute is the limit.
@RioTGeaRMusic3 ай бұрын
You sound like an idiot
@kevinmc11113 ай бұрын
Two of them have the same fry! So annoying!
@AndyTheMartian-6263 ай бұрын
Didn't even notice.
@masonliebe10443 ай бұрын
This is something that happens naturally when some people are thinking really hard when speaking. Also it’s an artifact of autism which probably all of these guys have. They are world class olympiad level mathematicians and computer scientists.
@jmgriffin23 ай бұрын
I have known fucking clue what they are talking about but it sounds smart.
@TheObscureAlternative3 ай бұрын
5 idiots walk into a bar...
@Derrekito3 ай бұрын
I haven't gotten a single good response from o1. I'm genuinely confused about the hype.
@chesstictacs31073 ай бұрын
I look forward to building my own dynamic business website using this tool as it evolves.
@holetarget49252 ай бұрын
A pajeet with a try-hard-but-failed vocal fry
@bforce9093 ай бұрын
Yall are babies I swear
@hope423 ай бұрын
01 mini is much better at coding tha 01 preview!! 💯💯💯
@mateuspaes3 ай бұрын
#vocalfry
@GamingLarry205543 ай бұрын
this is literally roon
@blastatruestoryАй бұрын
What's happening with people's voices? They all sound like old Italian motorbikes
@JorAsh20252 ай бұрын
i want to take their lunch money
@JungHeeyun-t3x3 ай бұрын
someone tryna be Sam
@topg30673 ай бұрын
lex still cant look people in the eyes. Emberassing man.
@miraculixxs3 ай бұрын
Gen Z is lit. In my time, at this age, we sure thought we know it all, but we kept quiet, and it was for good reason.
@khanra173 ай бұрын
Highly processed, awful muddy audio !
@LynxDev-IO2 ай бұрын
is it just me or vocal fry is so annoying ? it seems like laziness to express yourself, to speak and be heard
@KonradHjalmarАй бұрын
the amount of infuriating uptalk and vocal fry makes this video unwatchable, sorry sir....
@filbertneon38132 ай бұрын
DO NOT TRUST the answers chat gpt gives you! It is constantly wrong! I have been fact checking it and it’s kinda, garbage!